Multi-label feature selection based on HSIC and sparrow search algorithm

Tinghua Wang; Huiying Zhou; Hanming Liu; Tinghua Wang; Huiying Zhou; Hanming Liu

doi:10.3934/mbe.2023635

Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering

2023, Volume 20, Issue 8: 14201-14221. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023635

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Multi-label feature selection based on HSIC and sparrow search algorithm

School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, China

Academic Editor: Yang Kuang

Received: 27 April 2023 Revised: 10 June 2023 Accepted: 20 June 2023 Published: 26 June 2023

Feature selection has always been an important topic in machine learning and data mining. In multi-label learning tasks, each sample in the dataset is associated with multiple labels, and labels are usually related to each other. At the same time, multi-label learning has the problem of "curse of dimensionality". Feature selection therefore becomes a difficult task. To solve this problem, this paper proposes a multi-label feature selection method based on the Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion (HSIC) and sparrow search algorithm (SSA). It uses SSA for feature search and HSIC as feature selection criterion to describe the dependence between features and all labels, so as to select the optimal feature subset. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Keywords:

feature selection,
multi-label classification,
sparrow search algorithm,
Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion (HSIC),
data mining

Citation: Tinghua Wang, Huiying Zhou, Hanming Liu. Multi-label feature selection based on HSIC and sparrow search algorithm[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(8): 14201-14221. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023635

Related Papers:

[1]	Nur Raihan Abdullah, Faez Sharif, Nur Hafizah Azizan, Ismail Fitri Mohd Hafidz, Sugenendran Supramani, Siti Rokhiyah Ahmad Usuldin, Rahayu Ahmad, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar . Pellet diameter of Ganoderma lucidum in a repeated-batch fermentation for the trio total production of biomass-exopolysaccharide-endopolysaccharide and its anti-oral cancer beta-glucan response. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(4): 379-400. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020023
[2]	Ahmed Houari, Patrick Di Martino . Polysaccharide-hydrolysing enzymes enhance the in vitro cleaning efficiency of Nanofiltration membranes. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(4): 368-378. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.4.368
[3]	Vakhtang V. Dzhavakhiya, Elena V. Glagoleva, Veronika V. Savelyeva, Natalia V. Statsyuk, Maksim I. Kartashov, Tatiana M. Voinova, Alla V. Sergeeva . New bacitracin-resistant nisin-producing strain of Lactococcus lactis and its physiological characterization. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(4): 608-621. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.4.608
[4]	Joseph O. Falkinham . Mycobacterium avium complex: Adherence as a way of life. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(3): 428-438. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.428
[5]	Ananya Mukherjee, Puja Bhattacharjee, Rituparna Das, Arundhati Pal, Amal K. Paul . Endophytic bacteria with plant growth promoting abilities from Ophioglossum reticulatum L.. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 596-612. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.596
[6]	Thomas Bintsis . Lactic acid bacteria as starter cultures: An update in their metabolism and genetics. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(4): 665-684. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.4.665
[7]	Zoya Samoilova, Alexey Tyulenev, Nadezhda Muzyka, Galina Smirnova, Oleg Oktyabrsky . Tannic and gallic acids alter redox-parameters of the medium and modulate biofilm formation. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(4): 379-392. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.4.379
[8]	Javier Fernández, Sául Redondo-Blanco, Elisa M. Miguélez, Claudio J. Villar, Alfonso Clemente, Felipe Lombó . Healthy effects of prebiotics and their metabolites against intestinal diseases and colorectal cancer. AIMS Microbiology, 2015, 1(1): 48-71. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2015.1.48
[9]	Yen Thi Ngoc Phan, Minh Thuy Tang, Tu Thi Minh Tran, Van Huu Nguyen, Trang Hien Nguyen, Takeshi Tsuruta, Naoki Nishino . Diversity of lactic acid bacteria in vegetable-based and meat-based fermented foods produced in the central region of Vietnam. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(1): 61-70. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.1.61
[10]	Garmasheva I . Isolation and characterization of lactic acid bacteria from Ukrainiantraditional dairy products. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(3): 372-387. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.3.372

Abstract

1. Introduction

Ganoderma lucidum is a mushroom traditionally used in Chinese medicine for the prevention and treatment of human disease. Studies on G. lucidum and its products have reported beneficial biological, health-preserving and therapeutic effects [1]–[5]. Fungal polysaccharide has been shown to possess antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral activities [4],[6]–[10], and can be obtained via solid substrate fermentation (SSF) or submerged-liquid fermentation (SLF). However, owing to the inherent nature of the solid substrate in SSF, fungal growth occurs through mycelial colonization of the substrate bed [11]. Furthermore, poor mass transfer and heterogeneity issues within solid matrix render polysaccharide production in SSF a highly time-consuming method. SLF has been shown to be superior to SSF in this respect [11],[12].

In SLF, a suspended biomass grows as a cluster of mycelia that eventually stabilize to form pellets [13] in the form of densely branched hyphae forming a compact ovoid shape. Fungal polysaccharide exists in two forms, exopolysaccharide (EPS) and intracellular polysaccharide (IPS). EPS is secreted outside the mycelium whereas IPS is produced inside the mycelium [10],[14]. Generally, total polysaccharide content produced by the mushroom thus comprises both EPS and IPS. Many factors affect the cultivation of biomass and polysaccharide production in SLF, including pH, agitation speed, oxygen transfer rate (OTR), glucose concentration and temperature [15],[16].

Hence, to enhance the cultivation of biomass and polysaccharide production in SLF, where the key parameters interact with each other in a complex manner, response surface methodology (RSM) represents the most effective solution compared with the one-factor-at-a-time (OFAAT) method [15]. In this study, RSM was used to study the interaction and correlation between the set of experimental variables and obtained results, and to subsequently establish the optimised conditions. The medicinal mushroom G. lucidum was subjected to morphological and molecular analyses prior to liquid fermentation. Next, a preliminary study was conducted using the OFAAT method to obtain baseline data and the working ranges of the selected SLF parameters, prior to the optimisation of biomass, exopolysaccharide (EPS) and intracellular polysaccharide (IPS) production. The selected parameters were initial pH, glucose concentration and agitation rate.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Molecular characterisation

2.1.1. Mushroom mycelium

The fruiting body of Ganoderma lucidum was obtained from the Mushroom Unit, Expo Hill, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM). The appearance and structure of the fruiting body (Figure 1A) and the basidiospores structure (Figure 1C) was first evaluated to validate the fungus. Next, with some modification of the Stamets [17] method, tissue culture was performed to obtain the mycelium. The fruiting body was washed with 99.9% ethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK) for 10 s and dried in a laminar flow. Then, it was cracked using a scalpel and the inner part of the fruiting body was twisted and removed using forceps (Figure 1B). The tissue obtained was placed on malt extract agar (MEA) (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK) and maintained at room temperature until signs of mycelium growth were observed. The mycelium was then sub-cultured onto fresh MEA to obtain pure mycelium (Figure 1D), which was used as an initial culture for preservation in a potato dextrose agar (PDA) (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK) slant at 4 °C.

2.1.2. Preparation of mycelium for DNA extraction

The mycelium was separated from agar and placed in pre-cooled pestle and ground to a fine powder under liquid nitrogen. The powder was freeze-dried and stored in an Eppendorf tube (Eppendorf no. 0030120973, Hamburg, Germany) at −20 °C [18],[19].

2.1.3. gDNA extraction

The fine powdered mycelium (30 mg) was resuspended and lysed in lysis buffer (500 µL) by pipetting multiple times until the suspension became foamy. RNAase A (EN0531, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was added and the mixture was incubated for 5 min at 37 °C. To remove the cell debris, polysaccharide and protein, NaCl₂ solution (165 µL, 5 mol/L) was added and the tube was inverted multiple times before centrifugation (13,000 rpm, 20 min, 4 °C). The resulting supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube and mixed with chloroform (400 µL) and phenol (400 µL) by gentle inversion of the tube multiple times until the solution turned cloudy. The mixture was centrifuged (13,000 rpm, 20 min, 4 °C) and the aqueous phase was removed and extracted using an equal volume of chloroform. DNA was precipitated using 95% ethanol (2 volumes) and purified from polysaccharide by the addition of lysis buffer (500 µL) and mixing by gentle pipetting. NaCl (165 µL, 5 mol/L) was added and mixed by gentle inversion multiple times. To extract the purified DNA, chloroform (2 volumes) was added and the sample was centrifuged (13,000 rpm, 10 min, 4 °C). DNA was precipitated using ethanol (95%) and washed three times in ice-cold ethanol (70%). The washed DNA was dried, dissolved in Tris-EDTA buffer (50 µL) and stored at −20 °C [19].

Figure 1. Different stages of Ganoderma lucidum QRS 5120 (A) obtained from Expo Hill, Mushroom Unit, University Putra Malaysia. (B) sliced fruiting body of Ganoderma lcuidum QRS 5120. (C) Basidiospores of Ganoderma lucidum QRS 5120 (Bar = 10 µm). (D) mycelium of Ganoderma lucidum QRS 5120 (Day 7). (E) pellets formation in submerged fermentation at day 7 (Bar = 0.05 cm).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

2.1.4. PCR amplification

DNA dissolved in TE buffer (Thermo Fisher no. 12090015, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) was brought to room temperature slowly from −20 °C. Using universal primers (ITS1 and ITS4), the fungal ITS gene was amplified. First, the solution (500 µL) was added to PCR tubes (Eppendorf no. 0030124332, Hamburg, Germany). Then, 0.5 pmol of ITS1 and ITS4 was added following by deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs, 200 μM each) (Promega no. U1511, Madison, OH, USA), 0.5 U DNA polymerase (Promega no. D1501, Madison, OH, USA), supplied PCR buffer (ThermoFisher no. 14966123, Platinum II Green PCR Buffer) and water. PCR was performed as follow: 1 cycle (98 °C for 2 min) for initial denaturation; 25 cycles (98 °C for 15 secs; 60 °C for 30 secs; 72 °C for 30 sec) for annealing and extension, and 1 cycle (72 °C for 10 min) for final extension of the amplified DNA (Eppendorf Mastercycler gradient, Hamburg, Germany) [20].

2.1.5. PCR-amplified product purification and sequencing

The PCR products were purified and directly sequenced using a 16-capillary 3100 Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystem, Foster City, CA, USA). A BigDye® Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was used according to the manufacturer's protocol.

2.1.6. Data analysis

The obtained gDNA sequence was entered into BLAST. The NCBI Nucleotide Collection (nr/nt) database was selected and the query was submitted. Sequences producing significant alignment were identified, and the top 10 hit blast was selected for Multiple Sequencing Alignment (MSA) using Clustal Omega [21].

2.1.7. Phylogenetic analysis

Using the neighbouring-joining (NJ) in Molecular Evolutionary Genetic Analysis (MEGA-X), the evolutionary distance (K_nuc) of identical fungal species was calculated and a phylogenetic tree was generated. The species with closest K_nuc were considered the same species [21].

2.2. Submerged-liquid fermentation

G. lucidum QRS 5120 was subjected to batch fermentation in a 500-mL Erlenmeyer flask using the optimal media compositions and growth parameters (Table 1).

Table 1. Experimental range and levels of the independent variables.

Independent variables	Range and levels
Independent variables	−1	0	1
Initial pH	4	5	6
Glucose (g/L)	10	30	50
Agitation (rpm)	90	100	110

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

2.2.1. Optimisation of media (initial pH, glucose and agitation) using RSM

Based on the preliminary studies, initial pH was shown to have a high significance for the responses (mycelial biomass, EPS production and IPS production) [data not shown]. The media composition of seed culture in the shake flask were constant at (g/L): yeast extract 1 (Oxoid no. LP0021, Dardilly, France), KH₂PO₄ 0.5 (Bendosen Laboratory Chemicals no. C0637, Bendosen, Norway), K₂HPO₄ 0.5 (Bendosen Laboratory Chemicals no. C0680-2296192, Bendosen, Norway), MgSO₄ 0.5 (Bendosen Laboratory Chemicals no. C0481, Bendosen, Norway), and NH₄Cl₂ 4 (Bendosen Laboratory Chemicals no. C0055, Bendosen, Norway), unless otherwise stated [21]. To optimise the mycelium biomass, EPS and IPS production, CCD was used. The levels and range of the variables for this study are shown in Table 1. The lowest level of variables was initial pH 4; starting glucose concentration = 10 g/L; agitation rate = 90 rpm and the highest level of variables were initial pH 6; starting glucose concentration = 50 g/L; agitation rate = 110 rpm.

To analyse the impact of factors and their interaction, an empirical model was established based on a second-order quadratic model for the responses, as shown in Eq 1:

$Y = b_{0}^{'} + \sum_{i = 1}^{n} b_{i} X_{i} + \sum_{i = 1}^{n} b_{i i} X_{i}^{2} + \sum_{i = 1}^{n} \sum_{j > 1}^{n} b_{i j} X_{i} X_{j}$ (1)

where Y is the predicted response,

$b_{0}^{'}$ is the constant coefficient, b_i is the linear coefficient, b_ij is the interaction coefficient, b_ii is the quadratic coefficient and X_iX_j are the coded values.

2.3. Analytical methods

2.3.1. Mycelium biomass

After the tenth day of fermentation, a 50 mL of sample was filtered using a Buchner funnel filter and the mycelial biomass (Figure 1E) was washed three times with distilled water. The filtered mycelial was dried in a food dehydrator at 35 °C to a constant weight. The mycelial biomass was calculated by subtracting the weight of pre-dried filter paper before filtering from the weight of filter paper with mycelial biomass. To obtain the concentration of mycelial biomass, the value obtained from the subtraction was multiplied by the dilution factor [12].

2.3.2. Exopolysaccharide (EPS)

The supernatant obtained from filtering the mycelial biomass (Section 2.3.1) was mixed with ethanol (95%; 4 volumes), stirred and maintained at 4 °C overnight. The mixture was then transferred to a pre-weighed 50 mL Falcon tube and centrifuged (10,000 rpm, 15 min). The supernatant was discarded upon centrifuging and the pellet was placed in a food dehydrator at the lowest temperature until a constant weight was achieved. Next, the EPS yield was estimated by multiplying the dilution factor by the EPS weight [12].

2.3.3. Intracellular polysaccharide (IPS)

After weighing, the filtered mycelial biomass (Section 2.3.1) was mixed with distilled water (10 volumes). Then, the mixture was sterilised (121 °C, 30 min, 15 psi) in an autoclave and the mixture was filtered to obtain the supernatant, mixed with ethanol (95%; 4 volumes), stirred and maintained at 4 °C overnight. Next, the mixture was transferred to a pre-weighed 50 mL Falcon tube and centrifuged (10,000 rpm, 15 min). The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was placed in a food dehydrator at the lowest temperature until a constant weight was achieved. The IPS yield was estimated by multiplying the dilution factor by the IPS weight [14].

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Molecular characterisation

3.1.1. Gel electrophoresis

Molecular identification of a wild fungal sample is important to determine the species of the sample [22]. Thus, molecular identification was performed on wild G. lucidum. The base pairs of wild G. lucidum were estimated using agarose gel electrophoresis under UV light (Figure 2). The marker (Lane 1) represented the standard curve, and the base pairs of QRS 5120 were estimated to be 637 bp.

Figure 2. Agarose gel electrophoresis of DNA isolated from Ganoderma lucidum mycelium. Lane 1 corresponds to 10 kb marker. Lane 2 corresponds to negative control (−ve), Lane 3 corresponds to positive control (+ve) and Lane 4 corresponds to the sample (QRS_5120).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

3.1.2. Phylogenetic tree

Upon sequencing of the product, it was aligned with the top-10 related species as retrieved from NCBI BLAST. Based on the BLAST reference databases, QRS 5120 was found to be 99% similar to Ganoderma sp. Detailed phylogenetic analyses (Figure 3) showed the evolutionary distance (K_nuc) values. Clade A showed that G. lucidum QRS 5120 was closely related to G. lucidum isolate 39s compared with G. lucidum isolate 49s.

Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of Ganoderma lucidum strain QRS_5120 with evolutionary distance. Bar = 0.00020.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

3.2. Optimization

Using RSM, the effect of initial pH, starting glucose concentration and agitation rate on the biomass, EPS and IPS production was investigated. CCD design, the level of each variable and the responses are shown in Table 2. In total, twenty experiments were designated by CCD, where the coefficients were evaluated using non-linear regression analysis. To estimate the significance of the model coefficient, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used. The significance of each coefficient was indicated by p < 0.05.

Table 2. Experimental design matrix using RSM with CCD and responses for the mycelial biomass (DCW), EPS and IPS production from the mycelium of G. lucidum strain QRS 5120.

Run No.	Variables			Responses
	Initial pH	Glucose (g/L)	Agitation (rpm)	Biomass (DCW g/L)		EPS (g/L)		IPS (g/L)
	Initial pH	Glucose (g/L)	Agitation (rpm)	Actual	Predicted	Actual	Predicted	Actual	Predicted
1	4	10	90	4.6	4.52	2.2	2.31	1.2	1.28
2	6	50	110	3.8	3.92	1.2	1.13	0.2	0.14
3	6	50	90	3.1	2.97	0.9	0.91	0.2	0.25
4	5	30	100	4.1	4.12	1.1	1.31	0.8	0.85
5	5	30	90	3.9	3.6	1.3	1.15	0.7	0.73
6	5	50	100	3.8	3.96	1	0.91	0.9	0.83
7	5	30	100	4.2	4.12	1.4	1.31	0.9	0.85
8	4	50	110	5.1	4.79	2.1	2.18	1.4	1.53
9	5	30	100	3.8	4.12	1	1.31	0.9	0.85
10	4	50	90	4.9	5.04	1.9	1.96	1.5	1.44
11	5	30	100	3.9	4.12	1.3	1.31	0.7	0.85
12	5	30	110	4.2	4.3	1.4	1.37	0.9	0.77
13	5	30	100	4.2	4.12	1.5	1.31	0.8	0.85
14	5	30	100	4.1	4.12	1.2	1.31	0.8	0.85
15	4	30	100	5.2	5.26	2.9	2.61	1.7	1.57
16	6	10	110	4.1	4	1.2	1.18	0.1	0.18
17	6	30	100	4	3.74	1.3	1.41	0.3	0.33
18	4	10	110	4.8	4.97	2.5	2.53	1.5	1.47
19	5	10	100	4.1	3.74	1.2	1.11	0.8	0.77
20	6	10	90	2	2.35	1	0.96	0.3	0.19

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

3.2.1. Optimization of mycelium biomass production

The ANOVA for mycelium biomass production is shown in Table 3. The predicted coefficient determination indicates that 91.47% (R² = 0.9147) of the variability in the response can be explained using this model. The model is significant (p < 0.005). The adjusted coefficient determination value (Adj. R² = 0.84) implies the significance of the model and is in reasonable agreement with the predicted R² value. By considering the significant terms, the model, in terms of actual variables of biomass, was regressed and is expressed by Eq 2.

$B i o m a s s = 9.515227273 - 7.661136364 \times p H + 0.126295455 \times G l u c o s e + 0.238522727 \times A g i t a t i o n + 0.386363636 \times p H^{2} - 0.000659091 \times G l u c o s e^{2} - 0.001636364 \times A g i t a t i o n^{2} + 0.00125 \times p H \times G l u c o s e + 0.03 \times p H \times A g i t a t i o n - 0.00875 \times G l u c o s e \times A g i t a t i o n$ (2)

Table 3. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the experimental results of the CCD quadratic model for biomass from the mycelium of G. lucidum strain QRS_5120.

Source	Sum of Squares	DF	Mean Square	F Value	Prob > F
Model	8.588136364	9	0.954237374	11.90767001	0.0003*	significant
A: pH	5.776	1	5.776	72.07714124	<0.0001*	significant
B: Glucose	0.121	1	0.121	1.509926262	0.2473
C: Agitation	1.225	1	1.225	15.28644356	0.0029*	significant
A²	0.410511364	1	0.410511364	5.122660238	0.0471*	significant
B²	0.191136364	1	0.191136364	2.385138968	0.1535
C²	0.073636364	1	0.073636364	0.918888259	0.3604
AB	0.005	1	0.005	0.062393647	0.8078
AC	0.72	1	0.72	8.984685196	0.0134*	significant
BC	0.245	1	0.245	3.057288712	0.1109
Residual	0.801363636	10	0.080136364
Lack of Fit	0.666363636	5	0.133272727	4.936026936	0.0522	not significant
Pure Error	0.135	5	0.027
Cor Total	9.3895	19

Std. Dev. = 0.28308366896796		R² = 0.91465321514845		Adeq Precision = 14.52399050576
Mean = 4.095		Adjusted R² = 0.83784110878205

* Significant value.

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

From the model, initial pH (A) shows the strongest effect (p < 0.0001) on biomass, while agitation (C) shows a significant effect at p < 0.05. Both quadratic terms of initial pH (AA) and initial pH and agitation (AC) show significance effect at p < 0.05 on the yield of mycelium biomass. However, negative effects are shown by glucose (B) and quadratic terms (B², C², AB, and BC). Figure 4 shows the combined effect of initial pH, glucose concentration and agitation in three-dimensional (3D) plots. One factor is at the optimum level and the other two factors are within experimental range. Figure 4a shows the effect of initial pH (A) and starting glucose concentration (B), Figure 4b shows the effect of A and agitation rate (C), and Figure 4c shows the effect of B and C on biomass production. From Figure 4a,b, it is clear that increasing the initial pH leads to a decrease in the mycelium biomass, while agitation at all rates shows that high mycelium biomass production and starting glucose concentration is normally distributed. The maximum mycelium biomass obtained was at initial pH 4, glucose concentration 26.5 g/L and 100 rpm. From Figure 4c, no significance effect of B and C on mycelium biomass production was observed.

Figure 4. Response surface curve (3D plot) of mycelium biomass from G. lucidum strain QRS 5120 showing the interaction between (a) pH and glucose, (b) pH and agitation, (c) Glucose and agitation.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

3.2.2. Optimization of EPS production

The ANOVA of EPS production is shown in Table 4. The predicted coefficient determination indicates that 93.58% (R² = 0.9358) of the variability in the response can be explained using this model. The model was significant (p < 0.005). The adjusted coefficient determination value (Adj. R² = 0.8780) implies the significance of the model and is in reasonable agreement with the predicted R² value. By considering the significant terms, the model, in terms of actual variables of biomass, was regressed and is expressed in Eq 3.

$E P S = 15.17090909 - 7.667045455 \times p H + 0.021931818 \times G l u c o s e + 0.120090909 \times A g i t a t i o n + 0.695454545 \times p H^{2} - 0.000761364 \times G l u c o s e^{2} - 0.000545455 \times A g i t a t i o n^{2} + 0.00375 \times p H \times G l u c o s e + 4.76916 e^{- 16} \times p H \times A g i t a t i o n - 3.80257 e^{- 18} \times G l u c o s e \times A g i t a t i o n$ (3)

Table 4. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the experimental results of the CCD quadratic model for EPS production the mycelium of G. lucidum strain QRS_5120.

Source	Sum of Squares	DF	Mean Square	F Value	Prob > F
Model	5.364181818	9	0.596020202	16.20420717	<0.0001*	significant
A: pH	3.6	1	3.6	97.8744439	<0.0001*	significant
B: Glucose	0.1	1	0.1	2.718734553	0.1302
C: Agitation	0.121	1	0.121	3.289668809	0.0998
A²	1.330056818	1	1.330056818	36.16071429	0.0001*	significant
B²	0.255056818	1	0.255056818	6.934317845	0.0250*	significant
C²	0.008181818	1	0.008181818	0.222441918	0.6473
AB	0.045	1	0.045	1.223430549	0.2946
AC	0	1	0	0	1.0000
BC	0	1	0	0	1.0000
Residual	0.367818182	10	0.036781818
Lack of Fit	0.192818182	5	0.038563636	1.101818182	0.4589	not significant
Pure Error	0.175	5	0.035
Cor Total	5.732	19

Std. Dev. = 0.19178586543804		R² = 0.93583074287889		Adeq Precision = 12.53566341056
Mean = 1.48		Adjusted R² = 0.8780784114699

* Significant value.

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

From the model, initial pH (A) shows the strongest effect (p < 0.0001) on EPS concentration while both quadratic terms of initial pH (AA) and initial pH and glucose (BB) show a significance effect at p < 0.005 and p < 0.05, respectively, on EPS production. However, negative effects are shown by glucose (B), agitation (C) and quadratic terms (C², AB, AC and BC). Figure 5 shows the combined effect of initial pH, glucose concentration and agitation in 3D plots. One factor is at the optimum level and the other two factors are within experimental range. Figure 5a shows the effect of initial pH (A) and starting glucose concentration (B), Figure 5b shows the effect of A and agitation rate (C) and Figure 5c shows the effect of B and C on biomass production. From Figure 5a,b, increasing initial pH leads decreased EPS production, agitation at all rates shows high EPS production and starting glucose concentration is normally distributed. The maximum EPS obtained was at initial pH 4, glucose concentration 26.5 g/L and 100 rpm. From Figure 5c, no significance effect of B and C on mycelium biomass production was observed.

Figure 5. Response surface curve (3D plot) of EPS production from G. lucidum strain QRS 5120 showing the interaction between (a) pH and glucose, (b) pH and agitation, (c) Glucose and agitation.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

3.2.3. Optimization of IPS production

The ANOVA of IPS production is shown in Table 5. The predicted coefficient determination indicates that 96.88% (R² = 0.9688) of the variability in the response can be explained using this model. The model is highly significant (p < 0.0001). The adjusted coefficient determination value (Adj. R² = 0.9407) implies the significance of the model and is in reasonable agreement with the predicted R² value. By considering the significant terms, the model, in terms of actual variables of biomass, was regressed and is expressed in Eq 4.

$I P S = - 6.393409091 - 1.127954545 \times p H + 0.027068182 \times G l u c o s e + 0.221659091 \times A g i t a t i o n + 0.104545455 \times p H^{2} - 0.000113636 \times G l u c o s e^{2} - 0.000954545 \times A g i t a t i o n^{2} - 0.00125 \times p H \times G l u c o s e - 0.005 \times p H \times A g i t a t i o n - 0.000125 \times G l u c o s e \times A g i t a t i o n$ (4)

Table 5. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the experimental results of the CCD quadratic model for IPS production the mycelium of G. lucidum strain QRS_5120.

Source	Sum of Squares	DF	Mean Square	F Value	Prob > F
Model	3.935181818	9	0.437242424	34.47789725	<0.0001*	significant
A: pH	3.844	1	3.844	303.1111111	<0.0001*	significant
B: Glucose	0.009	1	0.009	0.709677419	0.4192
C: Agitation	0.004	1	0.004	0.315412186	0.5867
A²	0.030056818	1	0.030056818	2.370071685	0.1547
B²	0.005681818	1	0.005681818	0.448028674	0.5184
C²	0.025056818	1	0.025056818	1.975806452	0.1901
AB	0.005	1	0.005	0.394265233	0.5441
AC	0.02	1	0.02	1.577060932	0.2377
BC	0.005	1	0.005	0.394265233	0.5441
Residual	0.126818182	10	0.012681818
Lack of Fit	0.098484848	5	0.01969697	3.475935829	0.0989	not significant
Pure Error	0.028333333	5	0.005666667
Cor Total	4.062	19

Std. Dev. = 0.11261357902943		R² = 0.96877937424466		Adeq Precision = 17.969511850411
Mean = 0.83		Adjusted R² = 0.94068081106486

* Significant value.

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

From the model, initial pH (A) shows the strongest effect (p < 0.0001) on IPS concentration. However, negative effects are shown by glucose (B), agitation (C) and quadratic terms (A², B², C², AB, AC and BC). Figure 6 shows the combined effect of initial pH, glucose concentration and agitation in 3D plots. One factor is at the optimum level and the other two factors are within experimental range. Figure 6a shows the effect of initial pH (A) and starting glucose concentration (B), Figure 6b shows the effect of A and agitation rate (C) and Figure 6c shows the effect of B and C on biomass production. From Figure 6a,b, it is clear that increasing initial pH leads to decreased IPS production, agitation at all rates shows high IPS production and all concentrations of starting glucose give high IPS concentration. By this, it was concluded that there was no interaction between the factors. The maximum IPS obtained was at initial pH 4, glucose concentration 40.45 g/L and 103 rpm. From Figure 6c, no significance effect of B and C on IPS production was observed.

Figure 6. Response surface curve (3D plot) of IPS production from G. lucidum strain QRS 5120 showing the interaction between (a) pH and glucose, (b) pH and agitation, (c) Glucose and agitation.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

3.2.4. Verification of the optimized conditions

Table 6 shows the optimised conditions applied to verify the mycelium biomass, EPS and IPS production statistical model. To verify the strength and precision of the model under Eq 2, Eq 3 and Eq 4, various experiments were performed. The mycelium biomass obtained was 5.12 g/L, EPS production under optimized conditions was 2.49 g/L, and IPS production under optimized conditions was 1.52 g/L, which aligns with the predicted values (5.25 g/L, 2.69 g/L and 1.59 g/L, respectively). This shows that the model (Eq 2, Eq 3 and Eq 4) is valid for mycelium biomass, EPS and IPS production.

Table 6. Validation of the model with the optimized conditions.

Run	Variables			Response
Run	pH	Glucose	Agitation	Biomass (DCW g/L)	EPS (g/L)	IPS (g/L)
Biomass	4.01	32.09	102.45	5.12 ± 0.5	−	−
EPS	4	24.25	110	−	2.49 ± 0.8	−
IPS	4	40.43	103	−	−	1.52 ± 0.4
Biomass + EPS	4	24.75	107.58	5.11 ± 0.4	2.57 ± 0.7	−
Biomass + IPS	4	40.45	102.95	5.13 ± 0.5	−	1.57 ± 0.3
EPS + IPS	4	26.5	105.92	−	2.62 ± 0.4	1.52 ± 0.6
Biomass + EPS + IPS	4	26.5	100	5.19 ± 0.6	2.64 ± 0.6	1.52 ± 0.4

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

3.3. Comparison of the current study with the literature

The current statistical optimization approach to determine the preeminent parameters for obtaining efficient biomass, EPS and IPS production using G. lucidum in controlled shake-flask fermentation is shown in Table 7. As reported, only two studies utilizing G. lucidum for this purpose have previously been reported, utilizing only EPS and biomass production. ChangTsai and Houng [23] stated that mycelium formation and polysaccharide production were markedly improved by cultivation in optimal medium under optimal operating conditions. YuanChi and Zhang [24] also supported this observation by stating that optimal media markedly increases EPS production and mycelium formation. The process described in the current study was more efficient in producing biomass and EPS concentration compared with the results of YuanChi and Zhang [24] and ChangTsai and Houng [23], with the addition of IPS. The optimized key parameters reported in this study are the most up-to-date for G. lucidum using RSM on initial pH, glucose concentration and agitation for enhancing the production of biomass, EPS and IPS. The current optimized method can therefore be applied to achieve a combination of lower biomass with higher EPS and IPS in specialized bioreactors.

Table 7. Comparison of Ganoderma lucidum optimization using submerged-liquid fermentation with the literature.

Optimization method	Cultivation mode	Initial pH	Glucose concentration (g/L)	Agitation (rpm)	EPS (g/L)	IPS (g/L)	Biomass (g/L)	Reference
Response surface methodology	Shake Flask	4	26.5	100	2.64	1.52	5.19	Current study
Taguchi's orthogonal array	Shake Flask	6.5	12.1	160	0.420	NA	18.70	[23]
Orthogonal matrix	Shake Flask	−	50	150	1.723	NA	7.235	[24]

*NA = Not available, EPS = Exopolysaccharide, IPS = Intracellular polysaccharide.

| Show Table

DownLoad: CSV

4. Conclusions

The wild-cultivated Malaysian medicinal mushroom G. lucidum strain QRS 5120 was successfully identified using morphological and biomolecular methods. Using response surface methodology in a submerged-liquid fermentation, maximum mycelial biomass (5.19 ± 0.6 g/L) and EPS (2.64 ± 0.6 g/L) were obtained under optimized conditions of initial pH 4, 26.52 g/L glucose concentration and 103 rpm. On the other hand, maximum IPS production (1.57 ± 0.3 g/L) was obtained under optimized conditions of initial pH 4, glucose concentration 40.45 g/L and agitation 103 rpm. In addition, in order to maximise all three responses together, i.e. biomass, EPS and IPS (5.19 g/L, 2.64 g/L and 1.52 g/L respectively), the optimised conditions were initial pH 4, glucose concentration at 26.5 g/L and 100 rpm. It was found that by using the optimised conditions, the biomass, EPS and IPS production could be maximized. The initial pH could significantly affect biomass, EPS and IPS production in comparison to glucose concentration and agitation rate. The current work is suitable to be applied for other type of fungal fermentation for efficient EPS, IPS and biomass production.

References

[1]	J. Li, K. Cheng, S. Wang, F. Morstatter, R. P. Trevino, J. Tang, et al., Feature selection: a data perspective, ACM Comput. Surv., 50 (2018), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/3136625 doi: 10.1145/3136625
[2]	H. Zhou, T. Wang, D. Zhang, Research progress of multi-label feature selection, Comput. Eng. Appl., 58 (2022), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.3778/J.ISSN.1002-8331.2202-0114 doi: 10.3778/J.ISSN.1002-8331.2202-0114
[3]	T. Wang, X. Dai, Y. Liu, Learning with Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion: A review and new perspectives, Knowl. Based Syst., 234 (2021), 107567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107567 doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107567
[4]	A. Saxena, M. Prasad, A. Gupta, N. Bharill, O. P. Patel, A. Tiwari, et al., A review of clustering techniques and developments, Neurocomputing, 267 (2017), 664–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.06.053 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.06.053
[5]	S. Ayesha, M. K. Hanif, R. Talib, Overview and comparative study of dimensionality reduction techniques for high dimensional data, Inf. Fusion, 59 (2020), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.01.005 doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2020.01.005
[6]	T. Wang, Z. Hu, H. Liu, A unified view of feature selection based on Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion, Chem. Intell. Lab. Syst., 236 (2023), 104807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2023.104807 doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2023.104807
[7]	A. Tharwat, Independent component analysis: An introduction, Appl. Comput. Inf., 17 (2021), 222–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2018.08.006 doi: 10.1016/j.aci.2018.08.006
[8]	Y. Zhang, X. Xiu, Y. Yang, W. Liu, Fault detection based on canonical correlation analysis with rank constrained optimization, in The 2021 40th Chinese Control Conference, (2021). https://doi.org/10.26914/c.cnkihy.2021.028664
[9]	L. Zhang, T. Wang, H. Zhou, A multi-strategy improved sparrow search algorithm, Comput. Eng. Appl., 58 (2022), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2112-0427 doi: 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2112-0427
[10]	M. Paniri, M. B. Dowlatshahi, H. Nezamabadi-pour, MLACO: A multi-label feature selection algorithm based on ant colony optimization, Knowl. Based Syst., 193 (2019), 105285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105285 doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105285
[11]	M. Paniri, M. B. Dowlatshahi, H. Nezamabadi-pour, Ant-TD: Ant colony optimization plus temporal difference reinforcement learning for multi-label feature selection, Swarm Evol. Comput., 64 (2021), 100892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2021.100892 doi: 10.1016/j.swevo.2021.100892
[12]	Y. Zhang, D. Gong, X. Sun, Y. Guo, A PSO-based multi- objective multi-label feature selection method in classification, Sci. Rep., 7 (2017), 376. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00416-0 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00416-0
[13]	D. Paul, A. Jain, S. Saha, J. Mathew, Multi-objective PSO based online feature selection for multi-label classification, Knowl. Based Syst., 222 (2022), 106966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106966 doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106966
[14]	Z. Lu, X. Cheng, Y. Zhang, Global optimization method based on consensus particle swarm, J. Syst. Simul., 32 (2020), 1936–1942. https://doi.org/10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.20-fz0371 doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.20-fz0371
[15]	M. Abdel-Basset, D. El-Shahat, I. El-Henawy, V. Albuquerque, S. Mirjalili, A new fusion of grey wolf optimizer algorithm with a two-phase mutation for feature selection, Expert Syst. Appl., 139 (2020), 112824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112824 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112824
[16]	W. Li, Y. Li, Y. Zhao, B. Yan, Research on particle filter algorithm based on improved grey wolf algorithm, J. Syst. Simul., 33 (2021), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.19-0276 doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.19-0276
[17]	J. Xue, B. Shen, A novel swarm intelligence optimization approach: sparrow search algorithm, Syst. Sci. Control Eng., 8 (2020), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642583.2019.1708830 doi: 10.1080/21642583.2019.1708830
[18]	L. Sun, Y. Chen, J. Xu, Multi-label feature selection algorithm based on improved ReliefF, J. Shandong Univ. Nat. Sci., 57 (2022), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.7.2021.167 doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.7.2021.167
[19]	J. Gonzalez-Lopez, S. Ventura, A. Cano, Distributed multi-label feature selection using individual mutual information measures, Knowl. Based Syst., 188 (2020), 105052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105052 doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105052
[20]	J. Gonzalez-Lopez, S. Ventura, A. Cano, Distributed selection of continuous features in multilabel classification using mutual information, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst., 31 (2020), 2280–2293. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2944298 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2944298
[21]	C. Xiong, W. Qian, Y. Wang, J. Huang, Feature selection based on label distribution and fuzzy mutual information, Inf. Sci., 574 (2021), 297–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.06.005 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.06.005
[22]	Z. Sha, Z. Liu, C. Ma, J Chen, Feature selection for multi-label classification by maximizing full-dimensional conditional mutual information, Appl. Intell., 51 (2021), 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-01822-0 doi: 10.1007/s10489-020-01822-0
[23]	C. Liu, Q. Ma, J. Xu, Multi-label feature selection method combining unbiased Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion with controlled genetic algorithm, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 11304 (2018), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04212-7_1 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-04212-7_1
[24]	G. Li, Y. Li, Y. Zheng, Y. Li, Y. Hong, X. Zhou, A novel feature selection approach with Pareto optimality for multi-label data. Appl. Intell., 51 (2021), 7794–7811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02228-2 doi: 10.1007/s10489-021-02228-2
[25]	G. Li, Y. Li, Y. Zheng, A novel multi-label feature selection based on pareto optimality, Lect. Notes Data Eng. Commun. Technol., 88 (2021), 1010–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70665-4_109 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-70665-4_109
[26]	Y. Li, Binary sparrow search algorithm and its application in feature selection, Master thesis, Tianjin Normal University, 2022. https://doi.org/10.27363/d.cnki.gtsfu.2022.000316
[27]	T. Wang, W. Li, Kernel learning and optimization with Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern., 9 (2018), 1707–1717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-017-0675-7 doi: 10.1007/s13042-017-0675-7
[28]	Z. Hu, T. Wang, H. Zhou, Review of feature selection methods based on kernel statistical independence criteria, Comput. Eng. Appl., 58 (2022), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2203-0527 doi: 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2203-0527
[29]	X. Tian, J. He, Y. Shi, Statistical dependence test with Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion, J. Phys. Confer. Ser., 1601 (2020), 032008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1601/3/032008 doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1601/3/032008
[30]	B. B. Damodaran, N. Courty, S. Lefèvre, Sparse Hilbert Schmidt independence criterion and surrogate-kernel-based feature selection for hyperspectral image classification, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 55 (2017), 2385–2398. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2016.2642479 doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2642479
[31]	X. Lü, X. Mu, J. Zhang, Z. Wang, Chaotic sparrow search optimization algorithm, J. Beijing Univ. Aeronaut. Astronaut., 47 (2021), 1712–1720. https://doi.org/10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2020.0298 doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2020.0298
[32]	M. L. Zhang, Z. H. Zhou, A review on multi-label learning algorithms, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 26 (2014), 1819–1837. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2013.39 doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2013.39
[33]	J. Zhang, Y. Lin, M. Jiang, S. Li, Y. Tang, K. C. Tan, Multi-label feature selection via global relevance and redundancy optimization, in The 29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (2020). https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2020/348
[34]	J. Lee, D. W. Kim, Fast multi-label feature selection based on information-theoretic feature ranking, Pattern Recognit., 48 (2015), 2761–2771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2015.04.009 doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2015.04.009
[35]	G. Doquire, M. Verleysen, Mutual information-based feature selection for multilabel classification, Neurocomputing, 122 (2013), 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2013.06.035 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2013.06.035
[36]	G. Doquire, M. Verleysen, Feature selection for multi-label classification problems, in The 11th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21501-8_2
[37]	K. Trochidis, G. Tsoumakas, G. Kalliris, I. Vlahavas, Multilabel classification of music into emotions, in The 9th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-4722-2011-426793

This article has been cited by:

1.	Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah, Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar, Hassimi Abu Hasan, Henriette Stokbro Jensen, Anita Klaus, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Performance of wild-Serbian Ganoderma lucidum mycelium in treating synthetic sewage loading using batch bioreactor, 2019, 9, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-019-52493-y
2.	Norhidayah Mohd Taufek, Hanis H. Harith, Muhamad Hafiz Abd Rahim, Zul Ilham, Neil Rowan, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Performance of mycelial biomass and exopolysaccharide from Malaysian Ganoderma lucidum for the fungivore red hybrid Tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) in Zebrafish embryo, 2020, 17, 23525134, 100322, 10.1016/j.aqrep.2020.100322
3.	Mohamad Nor Azzimi Sohedein, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Yeong Hui-Yin, Zul Ilham, Jo-Shu Chang, Sugenendran Supramani, Phang Siew-Moi, Optimisation of biomass and lipid production of a tropical thraustochytrid Aurantiochytrium sp. UMACC-T023 in submerged-liquid fermentation for large-scale biodiesel production, 2020, 23, 18788181, 101496, 10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101496
4.	Siti Rokhiyah Ahmad Usuldin, Norfaizah Mahmud, Zul Ilham, Nur Kusaira Khairul Ikram, Rahayu Ahmad, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, In-depth spectral characterization of antioxidative (1,3)-β-D-glucan from the mycelium of an identified tiger milk mushroom Lignosus rhinocerus strain ABI in a stirred-tank bioreactor, 2020, 23, 18788181, 101455, 10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101455
5.	Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Norhidayah Mohd Taufek, Jaganath Puvanen Thiran, Janathu Ferdaus Pajaru Rahman, Grema Yerima, Kumeera Subramaniam, Neil Rowan, Investigations on the use of exopolysaccharide derived from mycelial extract of Ganoderma lucidum as functional feed ingredient for aquaculture-farmed red hybrid Tilapia (Oreochromis sp.), 2021, 3, 26668335, 100018, 10.1016/j.fufo.2021.100018
6.	Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Norhidayah Mohd Taufek, Grema Yerima, Janathu Rahman, Jaganath P. Thiran, Kumeera Subramaniam, Vikineswary Sabaratnam, Effect of bioreactor-grown biomass from Ganoderma lucidum mycelium on growth performance and physiological response of red hybrid tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) for sustainable aquaculture, 2020, 1879-4238, 10.1007/s13165-020-00303-5
7.	Saeideh Ahmadifar, syed Mohsen Hosseini, Ebrahim Mohammadi Goltapeh, Akbar Jahedi, Optimal method for production of mycelia biomass of Ganoderma lucidum in sugarcane molasses, 2020, 9, 2251-9270, 1, 10.29252/pps.9.1.1
8.	Nurul Amirah Hassan, Sugenendran Supramani, Mohamad Nor Azzimi Sohedein, Siti Rokhiyah Ahmad Usuldin, Anita Klaus, Zul Ilham, Wei-Hsin Chen, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Efficient biomass-exopolysaccharide production from an identified wild-Serbian Ganoderma lucidum strain BGF4A1 mycelium in a controlled submerged fermentation, 2019, 21, 18788181, 101305, 10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101305
9.	Anita Klaus, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Biljana Nikolić, Stefana Cvetković, Jovana Vunduk, Pink oyster mushroom Pleurotus flabellatus mycelium produced by an airlift bioreactor—the evidence of potent in vitro biological activities, 2021, 37, 0959-3993, 10.1007/s11274-020-02980-6
10.	Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Zul Ilham, Adi Ainurzaman Jamaludin, Neil Rowan, Use of Zebrafish Embryo Assay to Evaluate Toxicity and Safety of Bioreactor-Grown Exopolysaccharides and Endopolysaccharides from European Ganoderma applanatum Mycelium for Future Aquaculture Applications, 2021, 22, 1422-0067, 1675, 10.3390/ijms22041675
11.	Silambarasi Mooralitharan, Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah, Teh Sabariah Binti Abd Manan, Hassimi Abu Hasan, Henriette S. Jensen, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar, Optimization of mycoremediation treatment for the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and ammonia nitrogen (AN) removal from domestic effluent using wild-Serbian Ganoderma lucidum (WSGL), 2021, 0944-1344, 10.1007/s11356-021-12686-3
12.	Jovana Vunduk, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Shaiful Azuar Mohamad, Nur Hafizati Abd Halim, Ahmad Zainuri Mohd Dzomir, Željko Žižak, Anita Klaus, Polysaccharides of Pleurotus flabellatus strain Mynuk produced by submerged fermentation as a promising novel tool against adhesion and biofilm formation of foodborne pathogens, 2019, 112, 00236438, 108221, 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.05.119
13.	Z Ilham, M R A Mansor, Optimized Conversion of Nyamplung Seeds Oil to Biodiesel Using Box-Behnken Response Surface Methodology (RSM), 2020, 877, 1757-899X, 012029, 10.1088/1757-899X/877/1/012029
14.	Fátima R. Viceconte, Marina L. Diaz, Daniela S. Soresi, Ileana B. Lencinas, Alicia Carrera, María Inés Prat, María Soledad Vela Gurovic, Ganoderma sessile is a fast polysaccharide producer among Ganoderma species, 2021, 0027-5514, 1, 10.1080/00275514.2020.1870255
15.	Liping Liu, Jie Feng, Kun Gao, Shuai Zhou, Mengqiu Yan, Chuanhong Tang, Jing Zhou, Yanfang Liu, Jingsong Zhang, Influence of carbon and nitrogen sources on structural features and immunomodulatory activity of exopolysaccharides from Ganoderma lucidum, 2022, 119, 13595113, 96, 10.1016/j.procbio.2022.05.016
16.	Arman Hamza, Shreya Ghanekar, Devarai Santhosh Kumar, Current trends in health-promoting potential and biomaterial applications of edible mushrooms for human wellness, 2023, 51, 22124292, 102290, 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.102290
17.	Besek Mariam Mohamad Jahis, Zul Ilham, Sugenendran Supramani, Mohamad Nor Azzimi Sohedein, Mohamad Faizal Ibrahim, Suraini Abd-Aziz, Neil Rowan, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Ganodiesel: A New Biodiesel Feedstock from Biomass of the Mushroom Ganoderma lucidum, 2022, 14, 2071-1050, 10764, 10.3390/su141710764
18.	Siti Rokhiyah Ahmad Usuldin, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Zul Ilham, Adi Ainurzaman Jamaludin, Nur Raihan Abdullah, Neil Rowan, In vivo toxicity of bioreactor-grown biomass and exopolysaccharides from Malaysian tiger milk mushroom mycelium for potential future health applications, 2021, 11, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-021-02486-7
19.	Rahayu Ahmad, Srivani Sellathoroe, Ehwan Ngadi, Tengku Shafazila Tengku Saharuddin, Iffah Izzati Zakaria, Suguna Selvakumaran, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Isolation, identification, cultivation and determination of antimicrobial β-glucan from a wild-termite mushroom Termitomyces heimii RFES 230662, 2021, 37, 18788181, 102187, 10.1016/j.bcab.2021.102187
20.	Z. M. Hanafiah, W. H. M. Wan Mohtar, H. A. Hasan, H. S. Jensen, A. Klaus, S. Sharil, W. A. A. Q. I. Wan-Mohtar, Ability of Ganoderma lucidum mycelial pellets to remove ammonia and organic matter from domestic wastewater, 2022, 19, 1735-1472, 7307, 10.1007/s13762-021-03633-3
21.	Siti Rokhiyah Ahmad Usuldin, Zul Ilham, Adi Ainurzaman Jamaludin, Rahayu Ahmad, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Enhancing Biomass-Exopolysaccharides Production of Lignosus rhinocerus in a High-Scale Stirred-Tank Bioreactor and Its Potential Lipid as Bioenergy, 2023, 16, 1996-1073, 2330, 10.3390/en16052330
22.	Sugenendran Supramani, Nur Ardiyana Rejab, Zul Ilham, Rahayu Ahmad, Pau-Loke Show, Mohamad Faizal Ibrahim, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Performance of Biomass and Exopolysaccharide Production from the Medicinal Mushroom Ganoderma lucidum in a New Fabricated Air-L-Shaped Bioreactor (ALSB), 2023, 11, 2227-9717, 670, 10.3390/pr11030670
23.	Joshini Pillai Balamurugan, Sugenendran Supramani, Siti Rokhiyah Ahmad Usuldin, Zul Ilham, Anita Klaus, Nur Kusaira Khairul Ikram, Rahayu Ahmad, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Efficient biomass-endopolysaccharide production from an identified wild-Serbian Ganoderma applanatum strain BGS6Ap mycelium in a controlled submerged fermentation, 2021, 37, 18788181, 102166, 10.1016/j.bcab.2021.102166
24.	Alireza Tajik, Hamid Reza Samadlouie, Amir Salek Farrokhi, Amir Ghasemi, Optimization of chemical conditions for metabolites production by Ganoderma lucidum using response surface methodology and investigation of antimicrobial as well as anticancer activities, 2024, 14, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1280405
25.	Jianying Huang, Tao Liu, Yimin Zhang, Pengcheng Hu, Comparative study of microwave-assisted and hydrothermal hydroxyapatite synthesis from neutralization slag: Optimization, energy, and adsorption, 2024, 50, 02728842, 42157, 10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.08.059
26.	Arman Hamza, Ankit Mylarapu, K. Vijay Krishna, Devarai Santhosh Kumar, An insight into the nutritional and medicinal value of edible mushrooms: A natural treasury for human health, 2024, 381, 01681656, 86, 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2023.12.014
27.	Lina Dávila Giraldo, Paula Villanueva Baez, Cristian Zambrano Forero, Walter Murillo Arango, Production, Extraction, and Solubilization of Exopolysaccharides Using Submerged Cultures of Agaricomycetes, 2023, 13, 2331-8325, 10.21769/BioProtoc.4841
28.	Arman Hamza, Abdul Khalad, Devarai Santhosh Kumar, Enhanced production of mycelium biomass and exopolysaccharides of Pleurotus ostreatus by integrating response surface methodology and artificial neural network, 2024, 399, 09608524, 130577, 10.1016/j.biortech.2024.130577
29.	Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah, Ammar Radzi Azmi, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Fabrizio Olivito, Giovanni Golemme, Zul Ilham, Adi Ainurzaman Jamaludin, Nadzmin Razali, Sarina Abdul Halim-Lim, Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar, Water Quality Assessment and Decolourisation of Contaminated Ex-Mining Lake Water Using Bioreactor Dye-Eating Fungus (BioDeF) System: A Real Case Study, 2024, 12, 2305-6304, 60, 10.3390/toxics12010060
30.	Khalid Sayed, Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar, Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Teh Sabariah Binti Abd Manan, Sarah Athirah Binti Mohamad Sharif, Simultaneous enhanced removal of pharmaceuticals and hormone from wastewaters using series combinations of ultra-violet irradiation, bioremediation, and adsorption technologies, 2024, 57, 22147144, 104589, 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104589
31.	Teik Chee Lim, Zul Ilham, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Production of Ganodiesel from the biomass of Ganoderma lucidum in air-L-shaped bioreactor (ALSB), 2024, 10, 24058440, e35170, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35170
32.	Niketan Deshmukh, Lakshmi Bhaskaran, Optimization of cultural and nutritional conditions to enhance mycelial biomass of Cordyceps militaris using statistical approach, 2024, 55, 1517-8382, 235, 10.1007/s42770-023-01222-9
33.	Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah, Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Aziza Sultana Bithi, Rosiah Rohani, Antonius Indarto, Zaher Mundher Yaseen, Suraya Sharil, Teh Sabariah Binti Abdul Manan, Removal of pharmaceutical compounds and toxicology study in wastewater using Malaysian fungal Ganoderma lucidum, 2024, 358, 00456535, 142209, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142209
34.	Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah, Anggita Rahmi Hafsari, Malini Elango, Zul Ilham, Febri Doni, Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar, Yusufjon Gafforov, Yong Jie Wong, Khairul Nizam Abdul Maulud, Nor Hidayah Ismail, Mohd Yusmiaidil Putera Mohd Yusof, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Removal of cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms (HABs) from contaminated local park lake using Ganoderma lucidum mycelial pellets, 2025, 11, 24058440, e41205, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41205

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering

3.9

Metrics

Article views(1650) PDF downloads(59) Cited by(1)

Preview PDF

Download XML

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline

Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering

Multi-label feature selection based on HSIC and sparrow search algorithm