Research article Special Issues

Numerical and deep learning methods for diffusion model with fractional Laplacian operator and its application to signal denoising

  • Published: 19 March 2026
  • MSC : 35R11, 65M06, 68T07

  • In modern signal processing applications, denoising signals remain an essential task, as it is difficult to reduce noise without compromising essential structural information. While standard Laplacian operators are limited in their capacity to handle long-range interactions and maintain fine-scale features, classical diffusion models offer a sound mathematical foundation for signal smoothing. To overcome these limitations, in this study, we developed a novel numerical and deep learning approach driven by a nonlocal fractional Laplacian operator of the form $ (-\Delta)^{s} $ $ (0 < s < 1) $, which captures long-range interactions within signals. To accurately approximate the fractional Laplacian dynamics, a classical second-order finite difference (FD) discretization of the Laplacian was constructed in space, and the fractional operator was defined through its spectral matrix power. The resulting semi-discrete system was integrated in time using an unconditionally stable Crank-Nicolson (CN) scheme. In addition to this model-based method, a convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture was employed as a refinement step, trained to learn the nonlinear mapping from noisy to clean signals. To evaluate the denoising capability and effectiveness of the proposed methods, different input signals contaminated with additive white Gaussian noise at prescribed signal-to-noise (SNR) ratios were considered. The SNR and root mean square error (RMSE) were used as quantitative performance measures. The results showed that the FD-CN and the CNN methods perform well in conjunction. The numerical scheme smooths the data in a numerically controlled way, and the CNN captures complex local structures and adapts to non-Gaussian noise patterns. In addition, the proposed framework was extended to multichannel real-world ECG signals, demonstrating its robustness in handling correlated noise across multiple leads. The multichannel experiments confirmed that the FD-CN and CNN-based approaches remain effective under realistic, real-data conditions.

    Citation: Ishtiaq Ali, Muneerah AL Nuwairan. Numerical and deep learning methods for diffusion model with fractional Laplacian operator and its application to signal denoising[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2026, 11(3): 7235-7263. doi: 10.3934/math.2026298

    Related Papers:

  • In modern signal processing applications, denoising signals remain an essential task, as it is difficult to reduce noise without compromising essential structural information. While standard Laplacian operators are limited in their capacity to handle long-range interactions and maintain fine-scale features, classical diffusion models offer a sound mathematical foundation for signal smoothing. To overcome these limitations, in this study, we developed a novel numerical and deep learning approach driven by a nonlocal fractional Laplacian operator of the form $ (-\Delta)^{s} $ $ (0 < s < 1) $, which captures long-range interactions within signals. To accurately approximate the fractional Laplacian dynamics, a classical second-order finite difference (FD) discretization of the Laplacian was constructed in space, and the fractional operator was defined through its spectral matrix power. The resulting semi-discrete system was integrated in time using an unconditionally stable Crank-Nicolson (CN) scheme. In addition to this model-based method, a convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture was employed as a refinement step, trained to learn the nonlinear mapping from noisy to clean signals. To evaluate the denoising capability and effectiveness of the proposed methods, different input signals contaminated with additive white Gaussian noise at prescribed signal-to-noise (SNR) ratios were considered. The SNR and root mean square error (RMSE) were used as quantitative performance measures. The results showed that the FD-CN and the CNN methods perform well in conjunction. The numerical scheme smooths the data in a numerically controlled way, and the CNN captures complex local structures and adapts to non-Gaussian noise patterns. In addition, the proposed framework was extended to multichannel real-world ECG signals, demonstrating its robustness in handling correlated noise across multiple leads. The multichannel experiments confirmed that the FD-CN and CNN-based approaches remain effective under realistic, real-data conditions.



    加载中


    [1] P. W. Bates, On some nonlocal evolution equations arising in materials science, In: Nonlinear Dynamics and Evolution Equations, Fields Institute Communications, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 48 (2006), 13–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/fic/048/02
    [2] P. Carr, H. Geman, D. Madan, M. Yor, The fine structure of asset returns: An empirical investigation, J. Bus., 75 (2002), 305–332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/338705 doi: 10.1086/338705
    [3] J. Blackledge, M. Blackledge, Fractional anisotropic diffusion for noise reduction in magnetic resonance images, ISAST T. Electron. Signal Process., 4 (2010), 44–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.21427/D7491X doi: 10.21427/D7491X
    [4] J. L. Vázquez, Recent progress in the theory of nonlinear diffusion with fractional Laplacian operators, Discrete Cont. Dyn.-S, 7 (2014), 857–885. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/dcdss.2014.7.857 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2014.7.857
    [5] R. L. Magin, C. Ingo, L. C. Perez, W. Triplett, T. H. Mareci, Characterization of anomalous diffusion in porous biological tissues using fractional order derivatives and entropy, Micropor. Mesopor. Mat., 178 (2013), 39–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.02.054 doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.02.054
    [6] L. Caffarelli, L. Silvestre, An extension problem related to the fractional Laplacian, Commun. Part. Diff. Eq., 32 (2007), 1245–1260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03605300600987306 doi: 10.1080/03605300600987306
    [7] C. Brändle, E. Colorado, A. de Pablo, U. Sánchez, A concave–convex elliptic problem involving the fractional Laplacian, P. Roy. Soc. Edinb. A, 143 (2013), 39–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0308210511000175 doi: 10.1017/S0308210511000175
    [8] P. R. Stinga, J. L. Torrea, Extension problem and Harnack's inequality for some fractional operators, Commun. Part. Diff. Eq., 35 (2010), 2092–2122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03605301003735680 doi: 10.1080/03605301003735680
    [9] M. Portnoff, Time-frequency representation of digital signals and systems based on short-time Fourier analysis, IEEE T. Acoust. Speech Signal Process., 28 (1980), 55–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASSP.1980.1163359 doi: 10.1109/TASSP.1980.1163359
    [10] I. S. Reed, D. W. Tufts, X. Yu, T. K. Truong, M. T. Shih, X. Yin, Fourier analysis and signal processing by use of the Mobius inversion formula, IEEE T. Acoust. Speech Signal Process., 38 (1990), 458–470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/29.106864 doi: 10.1109/29.106864
    [11] G. U. Reddy, M. Muralidhar, S. Varadarajan, ECG de-noising using improved thresholding based on wavelet transforms, Int. J. Comput. Sci. Net., 9 (2009), 221–225.
    [12] I. Houamed, L. Saidi, F. Srairi, ECG signal denoising by fractional wavelet transform thresholding, Res. Biomed. Eng., 36 (2020), 349–360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42600-020-00075-7 doi: 10.1007/s42600-020-00075-7
    [13] J. Lian, Z. Liu, H. Wang, X. Dong, Adaptive variational mode decomposition method for signal processing based on mode characteristic, Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 107 (2018), 53–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.01.019 doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.01.019
    [14] Y. Wang, F. Liu, Z. Jiang, S. He, Q. Mo, Complex variational mode decomposition for signal processing applications, Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 86 (2017), 75–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.09.032 doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.09.032
    [15] G. Rilling, P. Flandrin, P. Gonçalvès, Bivariate empirical mode decomposition, IEEE Signal Proc. Let., 14 (2007), 936–939. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LSP.2007.904710 doi: 10.1109/LSP.2007.904710
    [16] M. Alfaouri, K. Daqrouq, ECG signal denoising by wavelet transform thresholding, Am. J. Appl. Sci., 5 (2008), 276–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2008.276.281 doi: 10.3844/ajassp.2008.276.281
    [17] A. Dixit, P. Sharma, A comparative study of wavelet thresholding for image denoising, Int. J. Image Graph. Signal Process., 6 (2014), 39–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.5815/ijigsp.2014.12.06 doi: 10.5815/ijigsp.2014.12.06
    [18] M. Nazari, S. M. Sakhaei, Successive variational mode decomposition, Signal Process., 174 (2020), 107610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2020.107610 doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2020.107610
    [19] N. ur Rehman, D. P. Mandic, Empirical mode decomposition for trivariate signals, IEEE T. Signal Proces., 58 (2010), 1059–1068. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2009.2033730 doi: 10.1109/TSP.2009.2033730
    [20] Z. Wu, N. E. Huang, Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: A noise-assisted data analysis method, Adv. Adapt. Data Anal., 1 (2009), 1–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1793536909000047 doi: 10.1142/S1793536909000047
    [21] F. Castells, P. Laguna, L. Sörnmo, A. Bollmann, J. M. Roig, Principal component analysis in ECG signal processing, EURASIP J. Adv. Sig. Pr., 2007 (2007), 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2007/74580 doi: 10.1155/2007/74580
    [22] J. Huang, L. Cui, Tensor singular spectrum decomposition: Multisensor denoising algorithm and application, IEEE T. Instrum. Meas., 72 (2023), 3510015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2023.3249249 doi: 10.1109/TIM.2023.3249249
    [23] M. Atemkeng, S. Perkins, E. Seck, S. Makhathini, O. Smirnov, L. Bester, B. Hugo, Lossy compression of large-scale radio interferometric data, arXiv Preprint, 2023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.07050
    [24] Y. Li, F. Liu, I. W. Turner, T. Li, Time-fractional diffusion equation for signal smoothing, Appl. Math. Comput., 326 (2018), 108–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2018.01.007 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2018.01.007
    [25] H. K. Rafsanjani, M. H. Sedaaghi, S. Saryazdi, Efficient diffusion coefficient for image denoising, Comput. Math. Appl., 72 (2016), 893–903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2016.06.005 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2016.06.005
    [26] B. A. Jacobs, T. Celik, Unsupervised document image binarization using a system of nonlinear partial differential equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 418 (2022), 126806. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2021.126806 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2021.126806
    [27] J. Blackledge, Application of the fractional diffusion equation for predicting market behaviour, Int. J. Appl. Math., 40 (2010), 130–158.
    [28] L. Silvestre, Regularity of the obstacle problem for a fractional power of the Laplace operator, Commun. Pur. Appl. Math., 60 (2007), 67–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpa.20153 doi: 10.1002/cpa.20153
    [29] L. Caffarelli, L. Silvestre, An extension problem related to the fractional Laplacian, Commun. Part. Diff. Eq., 32 (2007), 1245–1260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03605300600987306 doi: 10.1080/03605300600987306
    [30] M. Kwaśnicki, Ten equivalent definitions of the fractional Laplace operator, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 20 (2017), 7–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/fca-2017-0002 doi: 10.1515/fca-2017-0002
    [31] Q. Du, M. Gunzburger, R. B. Lehoucq, K. Zhou, Analysis and approximation of nonlocal diffusion problems with volume constraints, SIAM Rev., 54 (2012), 667–696. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/110833294 doi: 10.1137/110833294
    [32] X. R. Oton, J. Serra, The Dirichlet problem for the fractional Laplacian: Regularity up to the boundary, J. Math. Pure. Appl., 101 (2014), 275–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matpur.2013.06.003 doi: 10.1016/j.matpur.2013.06.003
    [33] K. M. Owolabi, E. Pindza, Modeling anomalous diffusion with Riesz fractional derivatives: Applications to pattern formation, Numer. Meth. Part. D. E., 41 (2025), e70041. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/num.70041 doi: 10.1002/num.70041
    [34] Y. Jin, S. Kwak, S. Ham, J. Kim, A fast and efficient numerical algorithm for image segmentation and denoising, AIMS Math., 9 (2024), 5015–5027. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/math.2024243 doi: 10.3934/math.2024243
    [35] C. Chen, Z. Chen, Y. Zhou, Y. Hao, B. Peng, X. Xie, H. Xie, A reliable evaluation approach for multichannel signal denoising algorithms based on a novel arterial pulse acquisition system, Heliyon, 10 (2024), e26140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26140 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26140
    [36] A. Lanza, A. Leaci, S. Morigi, F. Tomarelli, Symmetrised fractional variation with L1 fidelity for signal denoising via Grünwald-Letnikov scheme, Appl. Math. Comput., 500 (2025), 129429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2025.129429 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2025.129429
    [37] A. Rifai, M. N. Rachmatullah, W. K. Sari, ECG signal denoising using 1D convolutional neural network, Comput. Eng. Appl. J., 13 (2024), 60–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.18495/comengapp.v13i2.482 doi: 10.18495/comengapp.v13i2.482
    [38] L. Qiu, W. Cai, M. Zhang, W. Zhu, L. Wang, Two-stage ECG signal denoising based on deep convolutional network, Physiol. Meas., 42 (2021), 115002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ac34ea doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ac34ea
    [39] H. T. Chiang, Y. Y. Hsieh, S. W. Fu, K. H. Hung, Y. Tsao, S. Y. Chien, Noise reduction in ECG signals using fully convolutional denoising autoencoders, IEEE Access, 7 (2019), 60806–60813. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2912036 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2912036
    [40] X. Dong, T. Zhong, Y. Li, A deep-learning-based denoising method for multiarea surface seismic data, IEEE Geosci. Remote S., 18 (2021), 925–929. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2020.2989450 doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2020.2989450
    [41] W. Zhu, S. M. Mousavi, G. C. Beroza, Seismic signal denoising and decomposition using deep neural networks, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 57 (2019), 9476–9488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2019.2926772 doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2926772
    [42] Y. Pan, Q. Luo, Y. Fan, H. Chen, D. Zhou, H. Luo, et al., Deep learning-based denoising of noisy vibration signals from wavefront sensors using BiL-DCAE, Sensors, 25 (2025), 5012. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s25165012 doi: 10.3390/s25165012
    [43] T. Li, Z. Liu, Q. Sui, C. Lu, J. Han, S. Chen, et al., Deep learning-based blind denoising for distributed acoustic sensing seismic data with self-supervised and transfer learning, Photonic Sens., 15 (2025), 250434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13320-025-0769-x doi: 10.1007/s13320-025-0769-x
    [44] L. N. Trefethen, M. Embree, Spectra and pseudospectra: The behavior of nonnormal matrices and operators, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.
    [45] G. B. Moody, R. G. Mark, The impact of the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database, IEEE Eng. Med. Biol., 20 (2001), 45–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/51.932724 doi: 10.1109/51.932724
    [46] A. L. Goldberger, L. A. N. Amaral, L. Glass, J. M. Hausdorff, P. Ch. Ivanov, R. G. Mark, et al., PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: Components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals, Circulation, 101 (2000), e215–e220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.101.23.e215 doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.101.23.e215
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(523) PDF downloads(32) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(17)  /  Tables(2)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog