Combining NSP- and CPTu-based N<sub>kt</sub> to evaluate undrained shear strength

Gerardo W Quirós; Patricia M Peters; Kuat C Gan; Gerardo W Quirós; Patricia M Peters; Kuat C Gan

doi:10.3934/geosci.2023007

AIMS Geosciences

2023, Volume 9, Issue 1: 95-122. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2023007

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Combining NSP- and CPTu-based N_kt to evaluate undrained shear strength

1.
GWQ Geotechnics, Inc., Houston, TX 77055 USA
2.
Fugro USA Marine, Inc. (retired), Houston, TX 77081 USA
3.
Fugro USA Marine, Inc., Houston, TX 77081 USA

Received: 14 October 2022 Revised: 11 January 2023 Accepted: 27 January 2023 Published: 03 February 2023

A procedure for estimating reliable ranges of N_kt for direct simple shear (DSS)-based and anisotropically consolidated triaxial compression (CAUC)-based undrained shear strength is presented. The procedure is based on a combination of three Normalized Soil Parameter (NSP) methods and two CPTu (piezocone penetrometer) methods and are related to the ratio of net cone resistance to hydrostatic effective vertical stress. The NSP and CPTu data used were acquired from seven sites: these sites have stress histories ranging from very underconsolidated to very highly overconsolidated. The stratigraphies of the seven sites consist of clays that are moderately plastic to highly plastic. This proposed procedure was then applied to 22 published sites with a wide range of fine-grained soil types and index properties. The procedure yielded very consistent and reasonable envelopes of N_kt, which in turn, provide sound DSS-based strength profiles as well as CAUC-based strength profiles. The proposed procedure also clearly demonstrates that the range for N_kt factors is not limited to 15 to 20 for normally consolidated to lightly overconsolidated cohesive sediments, which is frequently employed by practitioners.
- in situ testing,
- normalized soil parameters,
- soft to hard clays,
- soil sampling effects,
- stress history,
- undrained shear strength
Citation: Gerardo W Quirós, Patricia M Peters, Kuat C Gan. Combining NSP- and CPTu-based Nkt to evaluate undrained shear strength[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2023, 9(1): 95-122. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2023007

Related Papers:

Abstract

A procedure for estimating reliable ranges of N_kt for direct simple shear (DSS)-based and anisotropically consolidated triaxial compression (CAUC)-based undrained shear strength is presented. The procedure is based on a combination of three Normalized Soil Parameter (NSP) methods and two CPTu (piezocone penetrometer) methods and are related to the ratio of net cone resistance to hydrostatic effective vertical stress. The NSP and CPTu data used were acquired from seven sites: these sites have stress histories ranging from very underconsolidated to very highly overconsolidated. The stratigraphies of the seven sites consist of clays that are moderately plastic to highly plastic. This proposed procedure was then applied to 22 published sites with a wide range of fine-grained soil types and index properties. The procedure yielded very consistent and reasonable envelopes of N_kt, which in turn, provide sound DSS-based strength profiles as well as CAUC-based strength profiles. The proposed procedure also clearly demonstrates that the range for N_kt factors is not limited to 15 to 20 for normally consolidated to lightly overconsolidated cohesive sediments, which is frequently employed by practitioners.

References

[1]	Young AG, Quiros GW, Ehlers CJ (1983) Effects of offshore sampling and testing on undrained soil shear strength. Annu Offshore Technol Conf. Houston, Texas, USA. https://doi.org/10.4043/4465-MS
[2]	Quiros GW, Young AG, Pelletier JH, et al. (1983) Shear strength interpretation for Gulf of Mexico clays. Geotech Pract Offshore Eng, 144–165.
[3]	Mayne PW, Peuchen J (2018) Evaluation of CPTU N_kt cone factor for undrained strength of clays, Cone Penetration Testing 2018. The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology, 423–429.
[4]	Agaiby SS, Mayne PW (2019) CPT evaluation of yield stress profiles in soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 145: 04019104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002164 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002164
[5]	Mayne PW, Peuchen J, Baltoukas D (2015) Piezocone evaluation of undrained strength in soft to firm offshore clays. Front Offshore Geotechnics III 1: 1091–1096.
[6]	Quiros GW, Little RL, Garmon S (2000) A normalized soil parameter procedure for evaluating in-situ shear strength. Annu Offshore Technol Conf. Houston, Texas, USA. https://doi.org/10.4043/12090-MS
[7]	Casey B, Germaine JT (2013) Stress dependence of shear strength in fine-grained soils and correlations with liquid limit. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 139: 1709–1717.
[8]	Yang SL, Lunne T, Santos R, et al. (2015) Strength parameters for suction anchors in a high plasticity Ghana clay. 3rd Int Symp Front Offshore Geotechnics 139: 1139–1144.
[9]	Ladd CC, Foott R (1974) New design procedure for stability of soft clay. J Geotech Eng 100: 763–786.
[10]	Zhang G, Germaine JT, Whittle AJ (2003) Effects of fe-oxides cementation on the deformation characteristics of a highly weathered old alluvium in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Soils Found 43: 119–130. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.43.4_119 doi: 10.3208/sandf.43.4_119
[11]	Burland JB (1990) On the compressibility and shear strength of natural soils. Géotechnique 40: 329–378.
[12]	Robertson PK, Cabal KL (2015) Guide to cone penetration testing for geotechnical engineering. Gregg Drilling & Testing, Inc., 6th Edition, Signal Hill, California, USA.
[13]	Rad NS, Lunne T (1986) Correlations between piezocone results and laboratory soil properties. Norw Geotech Inst, 306–317.
[14]	Lunne T, Anderson KH, Yang SL, et al. (2013) Undrained shear strength for foundation design at the Luva deep water field in the Norwegian Sea. Geotech Geophys Site Charact 1: 157–166.
[15]	Stevens RF, Millan C, Gupta U, et al. (2022) Pile Driving in Heavily Overconsolidated Clays. Annu Offshore Technol Conf. Houston, Texas, USA. https://doi.org/10.4043/31834-MS
[16]	L'Heureux JS, Lindgård A, Emdal E (2019) The Tiller-Flotten research site: Geotechnical characterization of a very sensitive clay deposit. AIMS Geosci 5: 831–867. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2019.4.831 doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.4.831
[17]	Gundersen AS, Hansen RC, Lunne T, et al. (2019) Characterization and engineering properties of the NGTS Onsøy soft clay site. AIMS Geosci 5: 665–703. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2019.3.665 doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.3.665
[18]	Helle TE, Aagaard P, Nordal S, et al. (2019) A geochemical, mineralogical, and geotechnical characterization of the low plastic, highly sensitive glaciomarine clay at Dragvoll, Norway. AIMS Geosci 5: 704–722. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2019.4.704 doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.4.704
[19]	Blaker Ø, Carroll RP, Paniagua P, et al. (2019) Halden research site: geotechnical characterization of a post glacial silt. AIMS Geosci 5: 184–234. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2019.2.184 doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.2.184
[20]	Bihs A, Long M, Nordal S (2020) Geotechnical characterization of Halsen-Stjørdal silt, Norway. AIMS Geosci 6: 355–377. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2020020 doi: 10.3934/geosci.2020020
[21]	Larsson R (2001) Investigations and load tests in clay till. Results from a series of investigations and load tests in the test field at Tornhill outside Lund in southern Sweden. Swedish Geotechnical Institute, Linköping, Sweden.
[22]	Di Buò B, D'Ignazio M, Selänpää J, et al. (2019) Investigation and geotechnical characterization of Perniö clay, Finland. AIMS Geosci 5: 591–616. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2019.3.591 doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.3.591
[23]	Nash DFT, Powell JJM, Lloyd IM (1992) Initial investigations of the soft clay test site at Bothkennar. Géotechnique 42: 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1992.42.2.163 doi: 10.1680/geot.1992.42.2.163
[24]	Zdravcovic L, Jardine R, Taborda DMG, et al. (2020) Ground characterisation for PISA pile testing and analysis. Géotechnique 70: 945–960. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.18.PISA.001 doi: 10.1680/jgeot.18.PISA.001
[25]	Radaszewski R, Wierzbicki J (2019) Characterization and engineering properties of AMU Morasko soft clay. AIMS Geosci 5: 235–264. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2019.2.235 doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.2.235
[26]	Mayne PW, Cargill E, Miller B (2019) Geotechnical characteristics of sensitive Leda clay at Canada test site in Gloucester, Ontario. AIMS Geosci 5: 390–411. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2019.3.390 doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.3.390
[27]	Kavur B, Mulabdic M, Minazek K (2010) Evaluation of piezocone characterization in deltaic deposits. 2nd Intern Symp on Cone Penetration Testing 2: 281–288.
[28]	Mayne P, Benoit J (2020) Analytical CPTU models applied to sensitive clay at Dover, New Hampshire. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 146: 04020130. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002378 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002378
[29]	DeGroot DJ, Landon ME, Poirier SE (2019) Geology and engineering properties of sensitive Boston Blue Clay at Newbury, Massachusetts. AIMS Geosci 5: 412–447. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2019.3.412 doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.3.412
[30]	Liedtke E, Jeanjean P, Humphrey GD (2006) Geotechnical site investigation for the Mad Dog spur anchors. 38th Annu Offshore Technol Conf. Houston, Texas, USA.
[31]	Schroder K, Andersen KH, Tjok KM (2006) Laboratory testing and detailed geotechnical design of the mad dog anchors. 38th Annu Offshore Technol Conf. Houston, Texas, USA. https://doi.org/10.4043/17949-MS
[32]	Giao P, Nguyen T, Long P (2008) An integrated geotechnical-geophysical investigation of soft clay at a coastal site in the Mekong Delta for oil and gas infrastructure development. Can Geotech J 45: 1514–1524. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-077 doi: 10.1139/T08-077
[33]	Ozkul ZH, Remmes B, Bik M (2013) Piezocone profiling of a deepwater clay site in the Gulf of Guinea. 45th Annu Offshore Technol Conf. Houston, Texas, USA. https://doi.org/10.4043/24136-MS
[34]	Trevor FA, Paisley JM, Konda Y, et al. (2008) Soil properties of deepwater sediments in the Timor Sea. Proc Geotech Geophys Site Charact. London: Taylor & Francis Group. 551–558.
[35]	Danziger FAB, Jannuzzi GMF, Toniazzo MVCMV, et al. (2015) DMT tests at Sarapui soft clay deposit: from 1985 to 2012. 3rd Intern Conf Flat Dilatometer DMT, 465–472.
[36]	Pineda JA, Kelly RB, Suwal L, et al. (2019) The Ballina soft soil field testing facility. AIMS Geosci 5: 509–534. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2019.3.509 doi: 10.3934/geosci.2019.3.509
[37]	Low HE, Lunne T, Andersen KH, et al. (2010) Estimation of intact and remoulded undrained shear strengths from penetration tests in soft clays. Géotechnique 60: 843–859. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.9.P.017 doi: 10.1680/geot.9.P.017
[38]	Casagrande A (1936) Determination of preconsolidation load and its practical significance. First Int Conf Soil Mech Found Eng 3: 60–64.

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)