Enhancing building energy efficiency: Formation of a cooperative digital green innovation atmosphere of photovoltaic building materials based on reciprocal incentives

Yudan Zhao; Yingying Zhang; Yueyue Song; Shi Yin; Chengli Hu; Yudan Zhao; Yingying Zhang; Yueyue Song; Shi Yin; Chengli Hu

doi:10.3934/energy.2023035

AIMS Energy

2023, Volume 11, Issue 4: 694-722. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023035

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Enhancing building energy efficiency: Formation of a cooperative digital green innovation atmosphere of photovoltaic building materials based on reciprocal incentives

1.
College of Economics and Management, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China
2.
School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China

Received: 03 April 2023 Revised: 16 July 2023 Accepted: 17 August 2023 Published: 30 August 2023

A good innovation atmosphere between photovoltaic building materials manufacturing enterprises and universities and scientific research institutions is conducive to the effective development of a cooperative digital green innovation process. This paper establishes an evolutionary game model for the formation of a cooperative digital green innovation atmosphere in photovoltaic building materials manufacturing enterprises under two mechanisms: direct and indirect reciprocity. The results show that both direct and indirect reciprocity mechanisms are conducive to the formation of a cooperative digital green innovation atmosphere for photovoltaic building materials manufacturing enterprises. This study provides theoretical guidance for photovoltaic building materials manufacturing enterprises to cultivate a cooperative digital green innovation atmosphere.
- innovation atmosphere,
- photovoltaic building materials manufacturing enterprises,
- reciprocity behavior
Citation: Yudan Zhao, Yingying Zhang, Yueyue Song, Shi Yin, Chengli Hu. Enhancing building energy efficiency: Formation of a cooperative digital green innovation atmosphere of photovoltaic building materials based on reciprocal incentives[J]. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(4): 694-722. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023035

Related Papers:

Abstract

A good innovation atmosphere between photovoltaic building materials manufacturing enterprises and universities and scientific research institutions is conducive to the effective development of a cooperative digital green innovation process. This paper establishes an evolutionary game model for the formation of a cooperative digital green innovation atmosphere in photovoltaic building materials manufacturing enterprises under two mechanisms: direct and indirect reciprocity. The results show that both direct and indirect reciprocity mechanisms are conducive to the formation of a cooperative digital green innovation atmosphere for photovoltaic building materials manufacturing enterprises. This study provides theoretical guidance for photovoltaic building materials manufacturing enterprises to cultivate a cooperative digital green innovation atmosphere.

References

[1]	Hepburn C, Qi Y, Stern N, et al. (2021) Towards carbon neutrality and China's 14th Five-Year Plan: Clean energy transition, sustainable urban development, and investment priorities. Environ Sci Ecotechnology 8: 100130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2021.100130 doi: 10.1016/j.ese.2021.100130
[2]	Hayat MB, Ali D, Monyake KC, et al. (2019) Solar energy—A look into power generation, challenges, and a solar-powered future. Int J Energy Res 43: 1049-1067. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4252 doi: 10.1002/er.4252
[3]	Bai S, Bi X, Han C, et al. (2022) Evaluating R&D efficiency of China's listed lithium battery enterprises. Front Eng Manage 9: 473-485. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42524-022-0213-5 doi: 10.1007/S42524-022-0213-5
[4]	Li G, Li M, Taylor R, et al. (2022) Solar energy utilisation: Current status and roll-out potential. Appl Therm Eng 209: 118285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.118285 doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.118285
[5]	Izam NSMN, Itam Z, Sing WL, et al. (2022) Sustainable development perspectives of solar energy technologies with focus on solar photovoltaic—A review. Energies 15: 2790. https://doi.org/10.3390/EN15082790 doi: 10.3390/EN15082790
[6]	Zhang L, Du Q, Zhou D, et al. (2022) How does the photovoltaic industry contribute to China's carbon neutrality goal? Analysis of a system dynamics simulation. Sci Total Environ 808: 151868. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2021.151868 doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2021.151868
[7]	Gao X, Zhang Y (2022) What is behind the globalization of technology? Exploring the interplay of multi-level drivers of international patent extension in the solar photovoltaic industry. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 163: 112510. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2022.112510 doi: 10.1016/J.RSER.2022.112510
[8]	Sun H, Zhi Q, Wang Y, et al. (2014) China's solar photovoltaic industry development: The status quo, problems and approaches. Appl Energy 118: 221-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.032 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.032
[9]	Shang WL, Lv ZH (2023) Low carbon technology for carbon neutrality in sustainable cities: A survey. Sustainable Cities Soc 92: 104489. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2023.104489 doi: 10.1016/J.SCS.2023.104489
[10]	Lei Y, Lu X, Shi M, et al. (2019) SWOT analysis for the development of photovoltaic solar power in Africa in comparison with China. Environ Impact Asses 77: 122-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.04.005 doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.04.005
[11]	Yin S, Yu YY (2022) An adoption-implementation framework of digital green knowledge to improve the performance of digital green innovation practices for industry 5.0. J Cleaner Prod 363: 132608. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.132608 doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.132608
[12]	George G, Merrill RK, Schillebeeckx SJ (2021) Digital sustainability and entrepreneurship: How digital innovations are helping tackle climate change and sustainable development. Entrep Theory Pract 45: 999-1027. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719899425 doi: 10.1177/1042258719899425
[13]	Shubbak MH (2019) The technological system of production and innovation: The case of photovoltaic technology in China. Res Policy 48: 993-1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.003 doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.003
[14]	Choudhary P, Srivastava RK (2019) Sustainability perspectives—A review for solar photovoltaic trends and growth opportunities. J Cleaner Prod 227: 589-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.107 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.107
[15]	Dong T, Yin S, Zhang N (2023) The interaction mechanism and dynamic evolution of digital green innovation in the integrated green building supply chain. Systems 11: 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11030122 doi: 10.3390/systems11030122
[16]	Yin S, Dong T, Li B, et al. (2022) Developing a conceptual partner selection framework: Digital green innovation management of prefabricated construction enterprises for sustainable urban development. Buildings 12: 721. https://doi.org/10.3390/BUILDINGS12060721 doi: 10.3390/BUILDINGS12060721
[17]	Yin S, Wang Y, Xu J (2022) Developing a conceptual partner matching framework for digital green innovation of agricultural high-end equipment manufacturing system toward agriculture 5.0: A novel niche field model combined with fuzzy VIKOR. Front Psychol 13: 924109. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2022.924109 doi: 10.3389/FPSYG.2022.924109
[18]	Zeng J, Chen X, Liu Y, et al. (2022) How does the enterprise green innovation ecosystem collaborative evolve? Evidence from China. J Cleaner Prod 375: 134181. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.134181 doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.134181
[19]	Gu YD, Zhou WL, Peng JS (2014) The impact of organizational innovation climate and perceived success and failure experience on the innovation efficacy of researchers. Res Dev Manage 5: 82-94. https://doi.org/10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.2014.05.009 doi: 10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.2014.05.009
[20]	Wang H, Chang Y (2017) The impact of organizational innovation climate and work motivation on employee innovation behavior. Manage Sci 3: 51-62. Available from: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v = l5E5JTlxS0tbWbvZONoYxA-9UG7raln2H657MlJgwLIdI-lx80-kowzYWSlQrOfmn74GA7AGO6U_dbnFYA0lsboZRLLDcmMGxXYDEcXuEyarmvb_OfG712UOTWglDmisWsp2dDxRrIw = & uniplatform = NZKPT & language = CHS
[21]	Yan L, Zhang ZH (2017) The mixed influence mechanism of organizational innovation climate on employee innovation behavior. Res Dev Manage 9: 97-105. https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2017.09.012 doi: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2017.09.012
[22]	Xie XM, Xu MY (2014) Collaborative innovation mechanism, collaborative innovation atmosphere and innovation performance: Using collaborative network as a mediating variable. Res Dev Manage 12: 9-16. https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2014.12.002 doi: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2014.12.002
[23]	Shanker R, Bhanugopan R, Van der Heijden BI, et al. (2017) Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of innovative work behavior. J Vocat Behav 100: 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.02.004 doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2017.02.004
[24]	Dang XH, Wang F (2014) The relationship between core enterprise leadership style, innovation atmosphere and network innovation performance. Prediction 2: 7-12. https://doi.org/10.11847/fj.33.2.7 doi: 10.11847/fj.33.2.7
[25]	Wang QE, Lai W, Ding M, et al. (2022) Research on cooperative behavior of green technology innovation in construction enterprises based on evolutionary game. Buildings 12: 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/BUILDINGS12010019 doi: 10.3390/BUILDINGS12010019
[26]	Huang SA, Wei Q (2011) Cooperative Behavior and Cooperative economics: A theoretical framework. Econ Theory Econ Manage 2: 5-16. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-596X.2011.02.001 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-596X.2011.02.001
[27]	Shubbak MH (2019) Advances in solar photovoltaics: Technology review and patent trends. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 115: 109383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109383 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109383
[28]	Opitz T, Schwaiger C (2023) Reciprocal preferences in matching markets. Max Planck Inst Innovation Competition Res 2023: 388. Available from: https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/94762/1/388.pdf.
[29]	Rao S, Pan Y, He J, et al. (2022) Digital finance and corporate green innovation: Quantity or quality? Environ Sci Pollut Res 29: 56772-56791. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-022-19785-9 doi: 10.1007/S11356-022-19785-9
[30]	Mariani L, Trivellato B, Martini M, et al. (2022) Achieving sustainable development goals through collaborative innovation: Evidence from four European initiatives. J Bus Ethics 180: 1075-1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-022-05193-Z doi: 10.1007/S10551-022-05193-Z
[31]	Fang Z, Razzaq A, Mohsin M, et al. (2022) Spatial spillovers and threshold effects of internet development and entrepreneurship on green innovation efficiency in China. Technol Soc 68: 101844. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2021.101844 doi: 10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2021.101844
[32]	Wang M, Lian S, Yin S, et al. (2020) A three-player game model for promoting the diffusion of green technology in manufacturing enterprises from the perspective of supply and demand. Mathematics 8: 1585. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8091585 doi: 10.3390/math8091585
[33]	Barczak G, Hopp C, Kaminski J, et al. (2022) How open is innovation research?—An empirical analysis of data sharing among innovation scholars. Ind Innov 29: 186-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2021.1967727 doi: 10.1080/13662716.2021.1967727
[34]	Vivona R, Demircioglu MA, Audretsch DB (2022) The costs of collaborative innovation. J Technol Transf 48: 873-899. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10961-022-09933-1 doi: 10.1007/S10961-022-09933-1
[35]	Dufwenberg M, Gneezy U, Güth W, et al. (2001) Direct vs indirect reciprocity: An experiment. Homo oeconomicus 18: 19-30. Available from: https://www.u.arizona.edu/~martind1/Papers-Documents/dvir.pdf.
[36]	Hilbe C, Chatterjee K, Nowak MA (2018) Partners and rivals in direct reciprocity. Nat Hum Behav 2: 469-477. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0320-9 doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0320-9
[37]	Nowak MA, Sigmund K (2005) Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature 437: 1291-1298. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04131 doi: 10.1038/nature04131
[38]	Lee S, Murase Y, Baek SK (2022) A second-order perturbation theory for the continuous model of indirect reciprocity. J Theor Biol 548: 111202. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.03920 doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.03920
[39]	Dong T, Yin S, Zhang N (2022) New energy-driven construction industry: Digital green innovation investment project selection of photovoltaic building materials enterprises using an integrated fuzzy decision approach. Systems 11: 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11010011 doi: 10.3390/systems11010011
[40]	Walter CE, Au-Yong-Oliveira M, Miranda Veloso C, et al. (2022) R&D tax incentives and innovation: Unveiling the mechanisms behind innovation capacity. J Adv Manage Res 19: 367-388. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-06-2021-0194 doi: 10.1108/JAMR-06-2021-0194
[41]	Hameed WU, Naveed F (2019) Coopetition-based open-innovation and innovation performance: Role of trust and dependency evidence from Malaysian high-tech SMEs. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 13: 209-230. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/196194.
[42]	Xia W, Li B, Yin S (2020) A prescription for urban sustainability transitions in China: Innovative partner selection management of green building materials industry in an integrated supply chain. Sustainability 12: 2581. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072581 doi: 10.3390/su12072581
[43]	Van Veelen M, García J, Rand DG, et al. (2012) Direct reciprocity in structured populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109: 9929-9934. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206694109 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206694109
[44]	Leimgruber KL (2018) The developmental emergence of direct reciprocity and its influence on prosocial behavior. Curr Opin Psychol 20: 122-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.01.006 doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.01.006
[45]	Liu Z, Qian Q, Hu B, et al. (2022) Government regulation to promote coordinated emission reduction among enterprises in the green supply chain based on evolutionary game analysis. Resour Conserv Recycl 182: 106290. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2022.106290 doi: 10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2022.106290
[46]	Santos FP, Pacheco JM, Santos FC (2021) The complexity of human cooperation under indirect reciprocity. Phil Trans R Soc B 376: 20200291. https://doi.org/10.1098/RSTB.2020.0291 doi: 10.1098/RSTB.2020.0291
[47]	Okada I (2020) A review of theoretical studies on indirect reciprocity. Games 11: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/g11030027 doi: 10.3390/g11030027
[48]	Nowak MA, Sigmund K (1998) Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature 393: 573-577. https://doi.org/10.1038/31225 doi: 10.1038/31225
[49]	Yu H, Jiang Y, Zhang Z, et al. (2022) The impact of carbon emission trading policy on firms' green innovation in China. Financ Innov 8: 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40854-022-00359-0 doi: 10.1186/S40854-022-00359-0

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)