Review

Sulfated polysaccharides from marine diatoms: Insight into molecular characteristics and biological activity

  • Received: 09 February 2024 Revised: 05 April 2024 Accepted: 17 April 2024 Published: 23 April 2024
  • Marine algae are a valuable source of sulfated polysaccharides presenting varied structural characteristics and biological activities. Regarding sulfated polysaccharides extracted from marine microalgae, molecular characteristics and bioactivity have yet to be fully explored, especially in diatoms. Sulfated polysaccharides from marine diatoms have great potential to produce numerous health benefits and lead to new biomedical materials. Nevertheless, these potential applications are based on the polysaccharide molecular characteristics, which define their functional properties. Therefore, a detailed understanding of sulfated polysaccharides from marine diatoms may represent the starting point for a broad development of innovative applications, especially in the biomedical area. In this context, the present manuscript aims to review marine diatom sulfated polysaccharides' molecular characteristics and biological activity, looking for a more profound knowledge of these macromolecules and their potential applications.

    Citation: Valeria Miranda-Arizmendi, Diana Fimbres-Olivarria, Anselmo Miranda-Baeza, Agustín Rascón-Chu, Jorge Marquez-Escalante, Jaime Lizardi-Mendoza, Mayra A. Méndez-Encinas, Elizabeth Carvajal-Millan. Sulfated polysaccharides from marine diatoms: Insight into molecular characteristics and biological activity[J]. AIMS Bioengineering, 2024, 11(1): 110-129. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2024007

    Related Papers:

    [1] Ricardo I. González-Vega, Carmen L. Del-Toro-Sánchez, Ramón A. Moreno-Corral, José A. López-Elías, Aline Reyes-Díaz, Norma García-Lagunas, Elizabeth Carvajal-Millán, Diana Fimbres-Olivarría . Sulfated polysaccharide-rich extract from Navicula incerta: physicochemical characteristics, antioxidant activity, and anti-hemolytic property. AIMS Bioengineering, 2022, 9(4): 364-382. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2022027
    [2] Mayra A. Mendez-Encinas, Dora E. Valencia-Rivera, Elizabeth Carvajal-Millan, Humberto Astiazaran-Garcia, Agustín Rascón-Chu, Francisco Brown-Bojorquez . Electrosprayed highly cross-linked arabinoxylan particles: effect of partly fermentation on the inhibition of Caco-2 cells proliferation. AIMS Bioengineering, 2021, 8(1): 52-70. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2021006
    [3] Sara R Robertson, Robert JC McLean . Beneficial biofilms. AIMS Bioengineering, 2015, 2(4): 437-448. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2015.4.437
    [4] Gerald Pawlish, Kyle Spivack, Adam Gabriel, Zuyi Huang, Noelle Comolli . Chemotherapeutic loading via tailoring of drug-carrier interactions in poly (sialic acid) micelles. AIMS Bioengineering, 2018, 5(2): 106-132. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2018.2.106
    [5] Figueroa-Pizano María Dolores, Campa-Mada Alma Consuelo, Canett-Romero Rafael, Paz-Samaniego Rita, Martínez-López Ana Luisa, Carvajal-Millan Elizabeth . Influence of arabinoxylan and crosslinked arabinoxylan consumption on blood serum lipids and glucose levels of Wistar rats. AIMS Bioengineering, 2021, 8(3): 208-220. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2021018
    [6] Thatiane Rodrigues Mota, Dyoni Matias de Oliveira, Rogério Marchiosi, Osvaldo Ferrarese-Filho, Wanderley Dantas dos Santos . Plant cell wall composition and enzymatic deconstruction. AIMS Bioengineering, 2018, 5(1): 63-77. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2018.1.63
    [7] Tanishka Taori, Anjali Borle, Shefali Maheshwari, Amit Reche . An insight into the biomaterials used in craniofacial tissue engineering inclusive of regenerative dentistry. AIMS Bioengineering, 2023, 10(2): 153-174. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2023011
    [8] Yong-Qiang Liu, Sri Suhartini, Liang Guo, Yeping Xiong . Improved biological wastewater treatment and sludge characteristics by applying magnetic field to aerobic granules. AIMS Bioengineering, 2016, 3(4): 412-424. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2016.4.412
    [9] Kristen K. Comfort . The rise of nanotoxicology: A successful collaboration between engineering and biology. AIMS Bioengineering, 2016, 3(3): 230-244. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2016.3.230
    [10] Nikolaos Giormezis, Konstantinos Papakonstantinou, Fevronia Kolonitsiou, Eleanna Drougka, Antigoni Foka, Styliani Sarrou, Evangelos D. Anastassiou, Efthimia Petinaki, Iris Spiliopoulou . Biofilm synthesis and its relationship with genetic characteristics in clinical methicillin-resistant staphylococci. AIMS Bioengineering, 2015, 2(4): 375-386. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2015.4.375
  • Marine algae are a valuable source of sulfated polysaccharides presenting varied structural characteristics and biological activities. Regarding sulfated polysaccharides extracted from marine microalgae, molecular characteristics and bioactivity have yet to be fully explored, especially in diatoms. Sulfated polysaccharides from marine diatoms have great potential to produce numerous health benefits and lead to new biomedical materials. Nevertheless, these potential applications are based on the polysaccharide molecular characteristics, which define their functional properties. Therefore, a detailed understanding of sulfated polysaccharides from marine diatoms may represent the starting point for a broad development of innovative applications, especially in the biomedical area. In this context, the present manuscript aims to review marine diatom sulfated polysaccharides' molecular characteristics and biological activity, looking for a more profound knowledge of these macromolecules and their potential applications.



    The increasing search for novel substances for treating diseases such as cancer, microbial infections, and inflammatory processes has motivated the exploration of different sources for finding new natural products with biotechnological/biomedical properties [1]. Thousands of natural compounds are found in the literature being structurally diverse and biologically active, of which most are from a plant origin. However, many bioactive compounds in the marine environment, are still unexplored [2].

    The ocean is considered the planet's richest source of natural products, and marine organisms are considered the best potential reservoir of such bioactive compounds. Due to the great diversity of species and the environmental conditions (sometimes extreme), numerous biologically active substances can be extracted from the sea [3]. Multiple marine compounds, such as peptides isolated from fish and polysaccharides recovered from algae, have been reported to present beneficial health properties [2].

    Marine algae, especially macroalgae, are considered a valuable source of sulfated polysaccharides. These polysaccharides are mainly thickening, stabilizing, emulsifying, and gelling agents [4]. However, they have also been studied as bioactive compounds presenting antitumoral, anticoagulant, antioxidant, and antiviral properties, among others [5][7], with promising properties that could be related to their chemical components and structure. Moreover, there is a wide range of products and industry sectors to explore in which these macromolecules can enhance current and ongoing health-related needs. Regarding sulfated polysaccharides extracted from different microalgae, molecular characteristics and functional properties have yet to be fully explored, especially in diatoms.

    To gain insight into the possible uses of marine algae sulfated polysaccharides, physicochemical and macromolecular characteristics must be considered since it has been reported they determine these molecules' functional properties [8]. A thorough investigation into these characteristics may serve as a starting point in developing innovative applications, bioactive compounds, and biomaterials, among others. In this context, the present manuscript aims to review marine diatom polysaccharides' molecular characteristics and bioactive properties, looking for a more profound knowledge of these macromolecules and their potential applications.

    Polysaccharides are biopolymers consisting of long chains made up of monosaccharide units. The tremendous structural variability they exhibit is due to the number of simple sugars available, primarily hexoses and pentoses, and the possibilities of glycosidic bonds. Several isomers can occur between the anomeric carbon in the α or β conformation bond and the five hydroxyls of the second monomer. The chain's flexibility also influences glycans' complexity, and given the nature of the sugars involved, the chains can be made up of homopolysaccharides and heteropolysaccharides. Finally, properties such as the molecular weight, the functional groups in the chains, and the presence of other covalently linked molecules, like proteins, contribute to a diverse structure-function relationship in these biopolymers [9].

    The macromolecular characteristics of polysaccharides, such as molecular weight (Mw) and intrinsic viscosity ([η]), are crucial to understanding the conformation and behavior of polysaccharide chains in solution. Studying the Mw of polymers is essential since it represents the total atomic weights of the constituent atoms within a molecule. It signifies the typical length of polymer chains within the bulk [10]. Aside from the Mw, there are other characteristics to describe polysaccharides, such as [η], which measures the contribution of a polymer to the viscosity of a solution when its concentration tends to zero and will depend on the conformation and Mw of the polymer in the solution [11]. Also, the polydispersity index (PDI) indicates the size distribution of the chains present in the polymer [12]. The PDI is 1 for monodisperse polymers, while PDI less than 1.2 and greater than 2 are generally considered narrow dispersion and broad dispersion, respectively [13].

    The radius of gyration (Rg) and the hydrodynamic radius (Rh) are also essential parameters in polysaccharide characterization. Rg describes the distribution of mass center in the molecule, whereas Rh is defined as the radius of an equivalent hard-sphere diffusing at the same rate as the molecule [14],[15]. In the Mark-Houwink-Sakurada equation, which is related to [η], the constants K and α allow for elucidating the conformation of polysaccharides. In this equation, the value of α is associated with the conformation of the polysaccharide chain, and values ​of 1.26 correspond to very rigid structures, while 0.50 indicates random coil structures. Furthermore, high K values ​represent an expanded coil conformation, and low K values ​​correspond to a compact coil conformation [16].

    Algae are fundamentally valued for their content of high molecular weight polysaccharides denominated as hydrocolloids, which are associated with the cell wall and intercellular spaces of seaweeds. These macromolecules have numerous roles in algae; they are the main structural components of their cell walls and participate in the recognition mechanisms of pathogens [17]. Algae polysaccharides perform structural functions, provide rigidity, accumulate mucilage in their cell walls, and provide protection against desiccation or stress conditions [18]. Furthermore, because they can retain significant amounts of water, these phycocolloids form gels and chelate metals. These have also been used for various commercial purposes in pharmaceutical sciences, food technology, biotechnology, cosmetics, engineering, etc. [19].

    Among the main polysaccharides in macroalgae are carrageenan, fucoidan, ulvan, laminarin, alginate, and agar [20],[21]. The type of carbohydrate varies greatly among algae. For instance, soluble fibers like alginates, fucans, and lamellar are found in brown algae, while red algae, such as agars, carrageenans, xylans, and floridian starch, present soluble fibers with sulfated galactans [22]. For green algae, starch, xylans, mannans, and ionic polysaccharides containing sulfate groups have been reported [23]. Aside from non-ionic polysaccharides, sulfated polysaccharides have arisen industrially. The leading polysaccharides in research are from macroalgae sources and are classified as carrageenan, fucoidan, and ulvan (Table 1).

    Unlike macroalgae, microalgae-extracted sulfated polysaccharides have not been fully characterized nor classified based on the main produced polysaccharides, such as macroalgae grouped by pigmentation. However, interest in microalgae is increasing due to their bioactive compounds and advantages, such as their ease of cultivation under controlled conditions. Most species are easy to grow, and the harvest does not depend on any climate or season, which enables the production of polysaccharides or any other compound throughout the year. Several microalgae species release polysaccharides and exopolysaccharides, and have been reported as antiviral, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, immunoregulatory, and biomedical agents [27]. However, detailed information following specific microalgal species culture conditions and extraction techniques is still needed to understand the chain conformation nature, rheologic behavior, and bioactivity correlation.

    Table 1.  Sulfated polysaccharides from macroalgae.
    Sulfated polysaccharide Scheme Structure Reference
    Carrageenan
    Extracted from red algae
    Backbone of repeating galactose units and 3,6-anhydrogalactose, both sulfated and no sulfated linked by alternating α(1→3) and β(1→4) glycosidic linkages. [24]
    Fucoidan
    Extracted from brown algae
    The backbone of α(1→3)-L-fucopyranose residues or of alternating α(1→3) and α(1→4)-linked L-fucopyranosyls, with sulfate substitutes, acetate, and side branches. It can also contain other monosaccharides (glucose, galactose, xylose, and mannose). [25]
    Ulvan
    Extracted from green algae
    Commonly made up of α- and β-(1,4)-linked monosaccharides (rhamnose, xylose, glucuronic acid, and iduronic acid) with characteristic repeating disaccharide units denominated aldobiuronic acids and ulvanobiuronic acids. [26]

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The polysaccharide's structural variability results in extraordinarily diverse compositions and roles of carbohydrates in living beings. In microalgae, carbohydrates perform storage and structural functions, biological activations, adhesion supports, metabolism, and water content regulations [28]. The main monosaccharides reported in algae polysaccharides are glucose, galactose, mannose, rhamnose, arabinose, xylose, ribose, and fucose [29].

    Due to their diverse biological features and low toxicity, high-molecular-weight polysaccharides and their degradation's low-molecular-weight products are economically significant. Most polysaccharides are utilized in the food sector as stabilizers, thickeners, and emulsifiers. Moreover, comprehending sulfated polysaccharides' chemical structure and physicochemical characteristics, such as their rheological characteristics and molecular weight, is essential for proposing their uses and future applications since they play a significant role in their biochemical behavior [27].

    Diatoms (Bacillariophyta) are considered the most diverse group within oceanic phytoplankton, with an estimated 105 to 107 species. They are a group of great importance given that they contribute approximately 40% of primary productivity in marine ecosystems and 20% of global carbon fixation [30]. Diatoms belong to the Heterokontophyta division and are divided into two taxonomic groups based on cell shape, where central diatoms have radial symmetry, and pennate diatoms have bilateral symmetry. Central diatoms are predominantly planktonic, while pennate diatoms can be found attached to surfaces or growing and moving through the sediment [31].

    In recent years, the potential of diatoms in nanotechnology and as a source of bioactive compounds, especially in the food industry, has been studied in parallel [30]. Depending on the mobility of the microalgae (benthic or planktonic) and the environmental conditions, these organisms produce different amounts of polymeric extracellular substances, mainly carbohydrates. Due to the thousands of species of the diatom group and the variety of shapes and symmetries available, monosaccharides' composition and glycoconjugates are usually particular. These organisms consist of a cell with a protoplast embedded in a frustule (name of the cell wall of diatoms) located between two overlapping valves or thecae, where the upper epitheca is larger than the lower hypotheca.

    The frustule is made up of three successive layers:

    (1) The innermost organic layer, the diatotepum, is in contact with the plasmalemma.

    (2) A silicified mineral layer containing organic matter.

    (3) An outer organic layer trapped in the secreted mucilage called “exopolysaccharide” is attached to the cell wall.

    Cell wall polysaccharides, intracellular polysaccharides (storage food, generally denominated as chrysolaminarin), and the mucilage (attached exopolysaccharides, colloidal exopolysaccharides, and low molecular weight polysaccharides) produced in various diatoms have been investigated (Figure 1). These studies have revealed that these polysaccharides' content, composition, and characteristics vary with environmental conditions and extraction techniques [30],[32].

    Figure 1.  Conceptual model of the different polysaccharides in benthic diatoms [32].

    The cell wall of diatoms is mainly composed of hydrated amorphous silica (SiO2·nH2O) and macromolecules, including proteins and polysaccharides. During synthesis, silicic acid polymerizes into silica, forming the frustules of diatoms. A previous study [33] argues that hydrated silica possibly deposits on organic layers because amino acids such as serine and threonine have high percentages of OH groups. It has been proposed that dissolved Si(OH)4 is deposited in protein layers through a dehydration reaction with OH-bearing amino acids. These layers exhibit a high Si–OH/Si–O–Si ratio and a low degree of polymerization Si-O.

    According to these authors, the outer layer of polysaccharides consists of various sugars (glucose, mannose, fucose, and xylose), and outward-directed hydroxyl groups of sugars represent the hydrophilic zone. In addition, protein template residues are serine, glycine, threonine, and aspartic acid (Figure 2). More dehydrated and polymerized layers develop during the silica frustules' growth process and form thicker layers. However, the mechanisms responsible for these reactions are still unclear [32]. The polysaccharides reported in diatoms are mainly related to intracellular storage chrysolaminarin, followed by those found in the extracellular matrix called exopolysaccharides. Meanwhile, the polysaccharides associated with the frustule or cell wall are primarily sulfated [34].

    Figure 2.  An organic layer arrangement is proposed in the diatom cell wall. Hatched lines show hydrogen bonds. Tetrahedra highlight the three-dimensionality of silicic acid (and the resultant silica) because, at its points, Si is in four-fold coordination with oxygen atoms [33].

    Exopolysaccharides are produced in diatoms due to the photosynthetic fixation of inorganic carbon [35]. These polymers perform several functions; among them, they can form mucilage envelopes and covers that form a microenvironment around the cells and protect them from sudden and adverse environmental changes. The presence of carboxyl and sulfate groups in these exopolysaccharides ensures the detoxification caused by heavy metals and the immobilization of toxic substances, in addition to preventing the cells from drying out during low tide [36],[37].

    The typical sulfate concentration in seawater is approximately 28 mmol/L, serving as a readily available sulfur source for synthesizing various sulfur-containing compounds. Algae absorb sulfate to produce sulfur-rich metabolites like methionine, glutathione, phytoalexins, and others, all ultimately derived from cysteine [38]. Many microorganisms, including microalgae, can secrete enzymes capable of releasing inorganic sulfur from organic compounds, thus making them accessible [39]. These enzymes, known as sulfatases, are categorized into aryl- and alkyl-sulfatases. Both types produce sulfur compounds but differ in their residual byproducts, yielding phenol and aldehyde. Upon uptake into the cytoplasm, sulfate is transported to plastids or stored in vacuoles when in excess [40].

    Glycoconjugates, including glycans and polysaccharides, undergo assembly and modification within the endomembrane system. This process involves several steps, beginning with the formation of activated nucleotide sugars like nucleoside diphosphate (NDP) sugars or nucleoside monophosphate (NMP) sugars in the cytosol. Subsequently, these nucleotide sugars are transported to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus, where glycosyltransferases (GT) utilize them as donor substrates to extend glycoconjugates by transferring specific sugars from their activated nucleotide forms to specific acceptors [30].

    The extracellular mucilage produced by diatoms comprises a high content of carbohydrates, and such a matrix can include other biopolymers. Sulfated polysaccharides are found in the cell walls of these microalgae. Sulfur compounds form the frustule, and the quantity and configuration vary according to environmental conditions. It has been reported that under stress conditions, the content of uronic acid, sulfates, and fucose increases to help the diatom adapt to sudden changes [34].

    One of the reasons why benthic diatoms dominate over other algae is the ability to move thanks to the secretion of a mucilaginous substance that binds to the substrate and allows it to slide through it. This movement is characteristic of pennate diatoms with raphe and apical porous fields that would enable an association with the substrate. However, some centric diatoms can also secrete mucilage from valve processes less frequently [41],[42]. These benthic diatom polysaccharides are incorporated into the marine food chain as a source of organic matter for planktonic and benthic marine animals [35],[37].

    Several studies highlight how polysaccharides' bioactive properties may be related to their molecular weight, sulfate group presence, and negative charge. Research on sulfated polysaccharides produced by various diatoms is complex since they are diverse and highly varied in structural characteristics. Unlike macroalgae, diatoms microalgae can be cultivated under controlled conditions (light intensity, wavelength, temperature, salinity, nutrients, pH, etc.), which makes its polysaccharides' chemical composition, structure, and functional behavior more stable regardless of the collection period [27].

    Despite the recognized importance of algae and their bioactive products' potential, diatoms' polysaccharide structure, compared to macroalgae, has yet to be explored. Due to the difficulties involved in polysaccharide extraction and purification, and the complexity of their chemical structure, only a few polysaccharide structures have been resolved. To date, there is scarce information on sulfated polysaccharides for diatoms. Some studies on the bioactive properties of sulfated and non-sulfated polysaccharides from diatoms are summarized in Table 2.

    Oxidative stress induced by excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) or reactive nitrogen species (RNS) has been linked to pathophysiological events in a large number of diseases [6]. Diatom polysaccharides have been considered promising antioxidant sources for their free radical scavenging properties and for preventing oxidative damage [43]. The antioxidant activity of polysaccharides from diatoms has been determined by multiple tests, including ROS scavenging, superoxide anion radical, hydroxyl radical, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging, and reducing power, among others [44]. Nevertheless, more information must be given regarding the molecular weight and the main functional groups that carry out this activity in the different sulfated polysaccharides and their oligosaccharides [45].

    The main factors attributed to antioxidant activity are the molecular weight and the number of sulfate groups in polysaccharides. Some sources discuss the role of sulfate groups in attenuating the hydrogen bond's dissociation energy, which amplifies this polysaccharide's hydrogen ion donating capacity [46]. This property can also be attributed to the high molecular weight structure facilitating the capture of free radicals produced by lipid peroxidation and the formation of complexes with metal ions such as Fe3+ necessary to produce radicals. It can also be influenced by the degree of polymerization and the reduced sugar content [47]. Sulfated polysaccharides from Chaetoceros muelleri, Navicula sp., Navicula inserta, and Odontella aurita, registering molecular weight values of 17–108 kDa, 45, 4.13, and 7.72 kDa, respectively, exhibited antioxidant activity [43],[48][50] (Table 2).

    Lower molecular weight sulfated polysaccharides generally exhibit greater antioxidant activity. According to a study on degraded fucoidans from Fucus vesiculosus, the antioxidant assay, measured by the ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), increased with decreasing molecular weight [51]. This intensified antioxidant efficacy of lower molecular weight polysaccharides may result from their less compact structure, potentially allowing for more hydroxyl and amine groups to be accessible for neutralizing free radicals [52]. Furthermore, sulfate content plays a crucial role in determining the antioxidant potential of fucoidan. Research on fucoidan from Laminaria japonica suggests a positive correlation between sulfate content and the ability to scavenge superoxide radicals. It proposed the ratio of sulfate content to fucose as an effective indicator for evaluating the antioxidant activity of fucoidans [53].

    Beyond the applications as gelling or emulsifying agents that algae polysaccharides are currently given in the food industry, in diatoms, these molecules have biological activity of high added value in biotechnological fields [60]. Multiple beneficial effects of different diatom polysaccharides on human health have been reported. Polysaccharides from diverse sources have emerged as promising molecules with good anticancer activity on various cancer cell lines. They could be considered alternative candidates for existing chemotherapeutic agents. In addition, they possess selective activity against tumor cells and present minimal side effects. Isolates from marine sources, among others, have reported an action mechanism mainly via apoptosis induction, Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) damage, cell cycle arrest, mitochondrial membrane disruption, and nitric oxide production to kill cancer cells and prevent metastasis [5]. A 1→3;1→6-α-D-glucan corresponding to a chrysolaminarin chemical structure was isolated from the diatom Synedra acus. This polysaccharide presented a molecular weight of 8.5 kDa, was nontoxic, and inhibited the proliferation of human colon cancer [54]. Anticancer activity was also reported in a polysaccharide extracted from the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum using HepG2 (human hepatoma) cells, but the molecule's chemical structure needed to be elucidated in detail [55] (Table 2).

    Table 2.  Bioactive polysaccharides isolated from marine diatoms.
    Source Sugars Yield (% w/w) Sulfate content Mw (kDa) Bioactivity Reference
    Chaetoceros muelleri n.d. 2.2 0.1 (mol/disaccharide) 4.13 Antioxidant. DPPH radical scavenging of 23% at 20 mg/mL. Did not present cytotoxicity in CCD-841 colon cells [43]
    Navicula sp. Glucose, galactose, rhamnose, xylose, mannose 4.4 0.33% 107 Antioxidant. DPPH radical scavenging 14–48% concentrations from 25–200 mg/mL [48]
    Navicula incerta Glucose, galactose, mannose, xylose 4.8 0.46% 45 Antioxidant and antihemolytic. Ferric-reducing antioxidant power 1.47 µmol TE/g, 54% antiradical activity on ABTS+. 90% hemolysis inhibition [49]
    Odontella aurita Glucose, mannose, ribose, arabinose, xylose, galactose n.d. n.d. 7.72 Antioxidant. DPPH radical scavenging activity 42% at 100 mg/mL. 83% hydroxyl radical scavenging activity at 10 mg/mL [50]
    Synedra acus 1→3;1→6-β-D-glucan n.d. n.d. n.d. Anticancer. Inhibition of human colon tumor cells IC50/72h of 54.5 and 47.7 µg/mL for HCT-116 and DLD-1 lines, respectively [54]
    Phaeodactylum tricornutum Xylose, fucose, glucose, galactose n.d. 20.36% 4810 Anticancer. Dose-dependent activity (up to 60.37% at 250 µg/mL). The effect occurs mainly through the induction of apoptosis of HepG2 cells [55]
    Navicula directa Fucose, xylose, galactose, mannose, rhamnose n.d. 8% n.d. Antiviral. Concentration-dependent inhibition of HSV-1, HSV-2, IFV-A infections, and cell-cell fusion caused by HIV [56]
    Gyrodinium impudicum Galactose, uronic acid n.d. 10.32% 18700 Antiviral effect against the encephalomyocarditis virus [57]
    Conticribra weissflogii 1→ 3-β-D-glucan n.d. n.d. 11.7 Immunomodulator. Enhanced the phagocytosis activity of macrophages RAW 264.7 at 0.5 µg/mL [58]
    Halamphora sp. Galactose, fucose, glucose, uronic acid n.d. 4.70% n.d. Immunomodulator. Phagocytosis rate 173% against E. coli for murine macrophage cells [59]

    ABTS+: 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid). HCT-116: colorectal cancer cell line. DLD-1: colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line. HepG2: human hepatoma. HSV-1 and HSV-2: Herpes simplex viruses (human herpesvirus types 1 and 2). IFV-A: influenza A virus. HIV: human immunodeficiency virus. RAW 264.7: macrophage cell line from a tumor induced with the Abelson murine leukemia virus.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Studies state how molecular modification could hold changes in the steric hindrance and electrostatic repulsion, while the flexion and the extension of polysaccharide chains and the water solubility impact the bioactivities [61]. Chemical modification methods on macroalgae polysaccharides have demonstrated that the sulfation of these macromolecules can improve their immunostimulant effects and thereby enhance their antitumor activity [61].

    Sulfated polysaccharides have described antiviral activity by blocking the entry of viruses into cells. The negative charge of these molecules performs their inhibitory action by interacting with the positive charges on the virus or the cell surface and stopping the virus from entering the host cells [7],[62],[63]. A higher molecular weight in fucoidan has been correlated to a higher affinity between the polysaccharide and the S-protein of Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [63]. Another study reported that 3-O-sulfated octasaccharide could prevent membrane fusion by specifically saturating the Glycoprotein D (gD) subunit of the Herpes Simplex Virus-1 (HSV-1) envelope protein. This specificity implied the potential for tailoring the sulfation level of oligosaccharide modification to produce a particular inhibitor of viral infection [62]. A polysaccharide from Navicula directa containing fucose, xylose, galactose, mannose, and rhamnose showed antiviral activity against herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 and influenza A [56]. This polysaccharide contained fucose, xylose, galactose, mannose, rhamnose, and sulfate, with a molecular weight of 220 kDa. The antiviral effect against the encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) was reported in a sulfated exopolysaccharide recovered from the diatom Gyrodinium impudicum [57]. It was indicated to be a homopolysaccharide of galactose with uronic acid (2.96% w/w) and sulfate groups (10.32% w/w) (Table 2).

    A recent study by [64] exposed that i-carrageenan effectively impeded the cell entry of SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped lentivirus in a manner dependent on dosage. It demonstrated remarkable efficacy, inhibiting 79% of the SARS-CoV-2 virus at 10 µg/mL, whereas, notably, k- and λ-carrageenan achieved an 80% inhibition rate at 100 µg/mL. Another study indicated that non-sulfated polysaccharides, such as carboxymethylcellulose and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, and low molecular weight galactose-4-sulfate, exhibited no activity at 100 µg/mL. Similarly, chondroitin sulfate, containing one sulfate group per dimer, did not exhibit significant inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 [65]. These findings suggest that the observed polysaccharide activity may be linked to the number of sulfate groups and the chain length.

    Previous investigations have also highlighted the necessity of a high level of structural flexibility for polysaccharide binding to the S glycoprotein. This flexibility is accentuated by the stronger binding observed between sulfated glycosaminoglycan and envelope protein [66]. Additionally, the presence of sulfates on a polysaccharide chain enhances solubility and activity by adopting a more extended conformation than non-sulfated polysaccharides [67].

    The immune system aims to protect the body from infections and maintain health. Several authors have discussed that the immunological activity of sulfated polysaccharides depends not only on the source, but also on the molecule's structural characteristics, such as molecular weight and degree of substitution. The sulfated polysaccharides have an immune regulator role in maintaining homeostasis and regulating macrophages, T/B lymphocytes, natural killer cells (NK cells), and complement systems [68].

    Polysaccharides can interact directly or indirectly with the immune system, activating the immune system through numerous cellular/molecular events. Most investigations focused on macrophage activity when looking for poly-saccharide-reported immunostimulatory properties [69]. Numerous in vivo studies have demonstrated that immunostimulatory polysaccharide treatment enhances macrophage phagocytic function. These polysaccharides may improve not only phagocytosis, but also the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), nitric oxide (NO), tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, and interferon (IFN)-γ, as well as the secretion of these pro-inflammatory cytokines [69][73]. Additionally, it has been noted that these macromolecules influence macrophage proliferation and differentiation [74].

    A recent study [58] identified a polysaccharide from the centric diatom Conticribra weissflogii. The chemical structure corresponds to a (1→3)-linked β-D-glucan with β-glucose substitutions at C-6. This polysaccharide registered a low molecular (11.7 kDa), no cytotoxic activity against glioblastoma cells, and possesses immunomodulatory properties. A polysaccharide from Halamphora sp. containing galactose, fucose, glucose, and uronic acid exhibited phagocytosis against E. coli [59] (Table 2).

    During their life cycle, diatoms release large amounts of adhesive polysaccharides, which are believed to play an essential role in carbon deposition. These polysaccharides assemble into non-covalently bound molecular networks [75], which aggregate into small exopolymer particles that aggregate diatom cells, minerals, and other larger marine particles [76]. It has been reported that fucose in diatoms possesses stability and adhesive properties, contributing to particle formation and potentially to carbon sequestration in the ocean [77]. A study found that C. socialis and two other Chaetoceros species produced a negatively charged polysaccharide rich in fucose, galactose, and sulfate, presenting adhesive properties [77].

    When cultivated, microalgae secrete polysaccharides increase the viscosity of the culture medium. These polysaccharides are generally attributed to non-Newtonian rheological behavior [78]. At low concentrations, these secreted biopolymers usually form solutions with high viscosities. It has been reported that the chemical composition of polysaccharides influences their solution's rheological properties. This fact can be related to the forming of hydroxyl or amino hydrogen bonds in the chain structure [79].

    Understanding the mechanical properties of microalgae culture is critical to optimizing bioreactors' design, expansion, and operation. This rheological behavior also influences the biomass recovery process. Rheology can help monitor and control microalgae production by studying how a material deforms and flows when subjected to applied stresses and shear speeds. [80]. This monitoring applied to the cultures could identify changes in exopolysaccharide properties and recover the most significant amount of the product synthesized with the best viscosity characteristics [81].

    Some marine sulfated polysaccharides can form hydrogels, three-dimensional networks of water-soluble polymers. They have drawn significant interest as drug delivery systems, mainly due to their very porous structure, which enables drug loading into the gel matrix and subsequent drug release at a rate that relies on the molecule's diffusion coefficient through the gel matrix. When exposed to water or other biological fluids, hydrogels swell without dissolving and can be easily modified by adjusting the density of crosslinks in the gel matrix [82].

    Polysaccharide hydrogels have shown attractive advantages in wound treatments due to their excellent biochemical and mechanical properties. For example, when used as dressings, hydrogels seek to fulfill the role of physical insulation and create a moist environment. Still, with increasing demands on the requirements for treating wounds and constant research, more hydrogel dressings with biological functions have been developed [83].

    In sulfated polysaccharides extracted from Navicula sp. [48], the authors reported gelling capability in the presence of 0.4% (w/v) FeCl3 (Figure 3a,b). The polysaccharide/FeCl3 system registered an elastic modulus (G′) higher than the viscous (G″) modulus value from 20 to 40 °C. The predominance of G′ over G″ confirms the formation of a polymer network (Figure 3). This trivalent iron-induced gelation in sulfated polysaccharide from Navicula sp. was compared to that reported in λ-carrageenan from Gigartina lanceata [84]. Sulfated polysaccharides from Navicula sp. also present antioxidant capacity, increasing the macromolecule's potential for developing diverse biomaterials for biomedical or biotechnological applications.

    Figure 3.  Sulfated exopolysaccharide recovered from Navicula sp. (a) before and (b) after FeCl3 addition as a gelling agent; (c) elastic G′ (●) and viscous G″ (○) moduli changes in 1% (w/v) sulfated exopolysaccharide/0.4% (w/v) FeCl3 during temperature ramp at 1 Hz and 2% strain [48].

    Rheological characteristics of sulfated polysaccharides from diatoms help develop and tailor different biomaterials for diverse applications. However, innovative approaches are needed to devise cost-effective ways to isolate these bioactive compounds, streamline their productivity, and elucidate detailed mechanisms of action [85]. The heterogeneity and structural diversity of sulfated polysaccharides derived from diatoms pose challenges in their investigation. Consequently, gaining a deeper understanding of the molecular characteristics of these polysaccharides is essential, as they play a determining role in their behavior and potential applications. Additionally, there is a need for more comprehensive information on other components within the biology of these organisms for a thorough understanding of the therapeutic or biotechnological properties of these macromolecules. This lack of knowledge seems to delay progress in utilizing microalgae polysaccharides effectively for various applications.

    One of the main limitations for the large-scale or commercialized application of these molecules could be the low biomass production compared to other organisms such as bacteria or macroalgae. These polysaccharides have been studied and characterized for several decades; however, new strategies are still necessary to increase the production of microalgae. The cultivation process presents specific challenges, such as operating costs, electrical energy consumption, and the bottleneck of biomass recovery.

    Multiple parameters can influence the production of polysaccharides during the cultivation process. Generally, nutrient limitations are carried out to accumulate these macromolecules; however, there is evidence that they can decrease the growth rate of microalgae. Biorefineries could enhance utilization and balance the cost ratio with biomass recovery. In addition, they could investigate the conditions that promote higher yields and better viability to take advantage of these biomolecules for various commercial sectors [86].

    On the other hand, the path towards its industrial application is challenging given the heterogeneous characteristics of these macromolecules. Currently, studies are focused on the structure and biological activity of sulfated polysaccharides from macroalgae, as well as the different harvesting stages and how these influence the structural characteristics. Heterogeneity and molecular weight are recognized as two of the main challenges limiting the therapeutic use of fucoidan, for example. Hence, there is also an increased interest in how low molecular weight polysaccharides with a certain degree of sulfation may improve the spectrum of bioactivities, as well as a vast investigation gap in methods for the obtention of specific and homogeneous fractions [87],[88].

    Further work is required to improve the ability to compare and establish connections between studies. Therefore, it is necessary to continue research on the modifications and adaptations of these macromolecules while examining their native structures. This involves considering factors such as extraction methods, harvesting, or cultivation conditions in microalgae. Additionally, conducting detailed analyses of macromolecular characteristics is necessary to enhance our understanding of their potential implications for biological activity.

    Ongoing investigations into sulfated polysaccharides from diatoms yield new insights into their sources, chemical composition, functional attributes, and potential uses. Numerous studies have focused on sulfated polysaccharides sourced from macroalgae, but gap in knowledge concerning the extraction and detailed characterization of sulfated polysaccharides from microalgae remains. The growing interest in the obtention of these polysaccharides suggests potential benefits for future applications. Nevertheless, further research is required to address questions regarding the molecular characteristics, properties, and bioactivity of sulfated polysaccharides. Exploring the structural attributes of these macromolecules is essential to comprehend their structure-function relation and potential utility.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    This research was funded by CONAHCYT, grant number 319684 to E. Carvajal-Millan.


    Acknowledgments



    The authors are pleased to acknowledge Alma C. Campa-Mada (CIAD) for assistance in manuscript revision.

    Conflict of interest



    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    Author contributions



    Conceptualization, V. M.-A., E.C.-M. and D. F.-O.; software, V. M.-A., J. L.-M. and J. M.-E.; validation, V. M.-A., E.C.-M., D. F.-O., A.R.-C., A., M.-B., M.A.M.-E. and J. L.-M.; resources, V. M.-A., E.C.-M., D. F.-O., A.R.-C., A., M.-B, J. L.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, V. M.-A.; writing—review and editing, V. M.-A., E.C.-M., D. F.-O, A., M.-B., J. L.-M., A.R.-C., M.A.M.-E. and J. M.-E.; visualization, V. M.-A., E.C.-M., D. F.-O, A., M.-B.; supervision, E.C.-M.; project administration, E.C.-M.; funding acquisition, E.C.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

    [1] Lordan S, Ross RP, Stanton C (2011) Marine bioactives as functional food ingredients: Potential to reduce the incidence of chronic diseases. Marine Drugs 9: 1056-1100. https://doi.org/10.3390/md9061056
    [2] Ntie-Kang F, Svozil D (2020) An enumeration of natural products from microbial, marine and terrestrial sources. Physical Sciences Reviews 5: 20180121. https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2018-0121
    [3] Hamed I, Özogul F, Özogul Y, et al. (2015) Marine bioactive compounds and their health benefits: A review. Compr Rev Food Sci F 14: 446-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12136
    [4] Pangestuti R, Kim S-K (2015) An overview of phycocolloids: The principal commercial seaweed extracts. Marine Algae Extracts: Processes, Products, and Applications. Germany: Wiley-VCH 319-330. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527679577.ch19
    [5] Khan T, Date A, Chawda H, et al. (2019) Polysaccharides as potential anticancer agents—A review of their progress. Carbohyd Polym 210: 412-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.01.064
    [6] Sun T, Tao H, Xie J, et al. (2010) Degradation and antioxidant activity of κ-carrageenans. J Appl Polym Sci 117: 194-199. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.31955
    [7] Wijesekara I, Pangestuti R, Kim S-K (2011) Biological activities and potential health benefits of sulfated polysaccharides derived from marine algae. Carbohyd Polym 84: 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.062
    [8] de Jesus Raposo M, de Morais A, de Morais R (2015) Marine polysaccharides from algae with potential biomedical applications. Marine Drugs 13: 2967-3028. https://doi.org/10.3390/md13052967
    [9] Prybylski N, Toucheteau C, El Alaoui H, et al. (2020) Bioactive polysaccharides from microalgae. Handbook of Microalgae-Based Processes and Products. Amsterdam: Elsevier 533-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818536-0.00020-8
    [10] McKeen LW (2013) The Effect of UV Light and Weather on Plastics and Elastomers. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2011-0-07329-5
    [11] Rio AR del, Ramírez-Gilly M, Tecante A (2017) Flow properties of lambda carrageenan in aqueous systems. Biological Activities and Application of Marine Polysaccharides. London: InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/65785
    [12] Danaei M, Dehghankhold M, Ataei S, et al. (2018) Impact of particle size and polydispersity index on the clinical applications of lipidic nanocarrier systems. Pharmaceutics 10: 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics10020057
    [13] Guo MQ, Hu X, Wang C, et al. (2017) Polysaccharides: Structure and solubility. Solubility of Polysaccharides. London: InTech 8-21. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.71570
    [14] Burchard W (1999) Solution properties of branched macromolecules. Branched Polymers II. Berlin: Springer 113-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49780-3_3
    [15] Tande BM, Wagner NJ, Mackay ME, et al. (2001) Viscosimetric, hydrodynamic, and conformational properties of dendrimers and dendrons. Macromolecules 34: 8580-8585. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma011265g
    [16] Teraoka I (2002) Polymer Solutions: An Introduction to Physical Properties. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471224510
    [17] Cardozo KHM, Guaratini T, Barros MP, et al. (2007) Metabolites from algae with economical impact. Comp Biochem Physiol C: Toxicol Pharm 146: 60-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2006.05.007
    [18] Pangestuti R, Kim S-K (2014) Biological Activities of Carrageenan. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800269-8.00007-5
    [19] Venugopal V (2008) Marine products for healthcare: functional and bioactive nutraceutical compounds from the ocean. Marine Products for Healthcare. Boca Raton: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420052640
    [20] Rengasamy KRR, Mahomoodally MF, Aumeeruddy MZ, et al. (2020) Bioactive compounds in seaweeds: An overview of their biological properties and safety. Food Chem Toxicol 135: 111013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2019.111013
    [21] Tseng CK (2001) Algal biotechnology industries and research activities in china. J Appl Phycol 13: 375-380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1017972812576
    [22] Kraan S (2012) Algal polysaccharides, novel applications and outlook. Carbohydrates - Comprehensive Studies on Glycobiology and Glycotechnology. London: InTech. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812360-7.00005-7
    [23] Zaporozhets TS, Besednova NN, Kuznetsova TA, et al. (2014) The prebiotic potential of polysaccharides and extracts of seaweeds. Russ J Mar Biol 40: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063074014010106
    [24] Kulkarni VS, Shaw C (2016) Use of polymers and thickeners in semisolid and liquid formulations. Essential Chemistry for Formulators of Semisolid and Liquid Dosages. New York: Academic Press 43-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801024-2.00005-4
    [25] Ale MT, Mikkelsen JD, Meyer AS (2011) Important determinants for fucoidan bioactivity: A critical review of structure-function relations and extraction methods for fucose-containing sulfated polysaccharides from brown seaweeds. Mar Drugs 9: 2106-2130. https://doi.org/10.3390/md9102106
    [26] Kidgell JT, Magnusson M, de Nys R, et al. (2019) Ulvan: A systematic review of extraction, composition and function. Algal Res 39: 101422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2019.101422
    [27] Raposo M, De Morais R, Bernardo de Morais A (2013) Bioactivity and applications of sulphated polysaccharides from marine microalgae. Mar Drugs 11: 233-252. https://doi.org/10.3390/md11010233
    [28] Singh P, Maparu AK, Shah S, et al. (2021) Biomimetic algal polysaccharide coated 3D nanofibrous scaffolds promote skin extracellular matrix formation. Mat Sci Eng C 119: 111580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111580
    [29] Vuppaladadiyam AK, Prinsen P, Raheem A, et al. (2018) Microalgae cultivation and metabolites production: a comprehensive review. Biofuel Bioprod Bior 12: 304-324. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1864
    [30] Gügi B, Le Costaouec T, Burel C, et al. (2015) Diatom-specific oligosaccharide and polysaccharide structures help to unravel biosynthetic capabilities in diatoms. Mar Drugs 13: 5993-6018. https://doi.org/10.3390/md13095993
    [31] Hoek C, Mann DG, Jahns HM (1995) Algae: an Introduction to Phycology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [32] Shniukova EI, Zolotareva EK (2015) Diatom exopolysaccharides: a review. Inter J Algae 17: 50-67. https://doi.org/10.1615/InterJAlgae.v17.i1.50
    [33] Alipour L, Hamamoto M, Nakashima S, et al. (2016) Infrared microspectroscopy of bionanomaterials (diatoms) with careful evaluation of void effects. Appl Spectrosc 70: 427-442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003702815626665
    [34] Underwood GJC, Paterson DM (2003) The importance of extracellular carbohydrate productionby marine epipelic diatoms. Adv Bot Res 40: 183-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2296(05)40005-1
    [35] Hecky RE, Mopper K, Kilham P, et al. (1973) The amino acid and sugar composition of diatom cell-walls. Mar Biol 19: 323-331. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00348902
    [36] Decho AW (1990) Microbial exopolymer secretions in ocean environments: their role (s) in food webs and marine processes. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review. London: Aberdeen University Press 73-153.
    [37] Orvain F, Galois R, Barnard C, et al. (2003) Carbohydrate production in relation to microphytobenthic biofilm development: An integrated approach in a tidal mesocosm. Microb Ecol 45: 237-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-002-2027-7
    [38] Dai WY, Han L, Li PF, et al. (2023) The sulfate assimilation and reduction of marine microalgae and the regulation of illumination. Mar Environ Res 191: 106156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2023.106156
    [39] Takahashi H, Kopriva S, Giordano M, et al. (2011) Sulfur assimilation in photosynthetic organisms: Molecular functions and regulations of transporters and assimilatory enzymes. Annu Rev Plant Biol 62: 157-184. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103921
    [40] Takahashi H, Buchner P, Yoshimoto N, et al. (2012) Evolutionary relationships and functional diversity of plant sulfate transporters. Front Plant Sci 2: 119. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2011.00119
    [41] Buendía-Flores M, Tavera R, Novelo E (2015) Florística y ecología de diatomeas bentónicas de la zona lacustre de Xochimilco-Tláhuac, México. Bot Sci 93: 531-558. https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.148
    [42] Lee RE (2018) Phycology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [43] Miranda-Arizmendi V, Fimbres-Olivarria D, Miranda-Baeza A, et al. (2022) Sulfated polysaccharides from chaetoceros muelleri: Macromolecular characteristics and bioactive properties. Biology 11: 1476. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11101476
    [44] Geresh S, Mamontov A, Weinstein J (2002) Sulfation of extracellular polysaccharides of red microalgae: Preparation, characterization and properties. J Biochem Bioph Meth 50: 179-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-022X(01)00185-3
    [45] Jiang JL, Zhang WZ, Ni WX, et al. (2021) Insight on structure-property relationships of carrageenan from marine red algal: A review. Carbohyd Polym 257: 117642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117642
    [46] Wang J, Hu S, Nie S, et al. (2016) Reviews on mechanisms of in vitro antioxidant activity of polysaccharides. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2016: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5692852
    [47] Kang MC, Kim SY, Kim EA, et al. (2015) Antioxidant activity of polysaccharide purified from acanthopanax koreanum nakai stems in vitro and in vivo zebrafish model. Carbohyd Polym 127: 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.02.043
    [48] Fimbres-Olivarría D, López-Elías J, Carvajal-Millán E, et al. (2016) Navicula sp. sulfated polysaccharide gels induced by Fe(III): Rheology and microstructure. Int J Mol Sci 17: 1238. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17081238
    [49] González-Vega RI, Del-Toro-Sánchez CL, Moreno-Corral RA, et al. (2022) Sulfated polysaccharide-rich extract from Navicula incerta: Physicochemical characteristics, antioxidant activity, and anti-hemolytic property. AIMS Bioeng 9: 364-382. https://doi.org/10.3934/bioeng.2022027
    [50] Xia S, Gao B, Li A, et al. (2014) Preliminary characterization, antioxidant properties and production of chrysolaminarin from marine diatom odontella aurita. Mar Drugs 12: 4883-4897. https://doi.org/10.3390/md12094883
    [51] Lim S, Choi J, Park H (2015) Antioxidant activities of fucoidan degraded by gamma irradiation and acidic hydrolysis. Radiat Phys Chem 109: 23-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2014.12.008
    [52] Gómez-Ordóñez E, Jiménez-Escrig A, Rupérez P (2014) Bioactivity of sulfated polysaccharides from the edible red seaweed Mastocarpus stellatus. Bioact Carbohyd Dietary Fibre 3: 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcdf.2014.01.002
    [53] Wang J, Zhang Q, Zhang Z, et al. (2008) Antioxidant activity of sulfated polysaccharide fractions extracted from laminaria japonica. Int J Biol Macromol 42: 127-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2007.10.003
    [54] Kusaikin MI, Ermakova SP, Shevchenko NM, et al. (2010) Structural characteristics and antitumor activity of a new chrysolaminaran from the diatom alga Synedra acus. Chem Nat Compd 46: 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10600-010-9510-z
    [55] Yang S, Wan H, Wang R, et al. (2019) Sulfated polysaccharides from Phaeodactylum tricornutum: isolation, structural characteristics, and inhibiting HepG2 growth activity in vitro. PeerJ 7: e6409. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6409
    [56] Lee JB, Hayashi K, Hirata M, et al. (2006) Antiviral sulfated polysaccharide from Navicula directa, a diatom collected from deep-sea water in Toyama Bay. Biol Pharm Bull 29: 2135-2139. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.29.2135
    [57] Yim JH, Kim SJ, Ahn SH, et al. (2004) Antiviral effects of sulfated exopolysaccharide from the marine microalga gyrodinium impudicum strain KG03. Mar Biotechnol 6: 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10126-003-0002-z
    [58] Rizzi J, Moro TR, Winnischofer SMB, et al. (2023) Chemical structure and biological activity of the (1 → 3)-linked β-D-glucan isolated from marine diatom Conticribra weissflogii. Int J Biol Macromol 224: 584-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.10.147
    [59] Lai HL, Yang LC, Lin PT, et al. (2020) Phagocytosis activity of three sulfated polysaccharides purified from a marine diatom cultured in a semi-continuous system. Int J Biol Macromols 155: 951-960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.054
    [60] Beaumont M, Tran R, Vera G, et al. (2021) Hydrogel-forming algae polysaccharides: From seaweed to biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 22: 1027-1052. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.0c01406
    [61] Guo R, Chen M, Ding Y, et al. (2022) Polysaccharides as potential anti-tumor biomacromolecules—a review. Front Nutr 9: 838179. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.838179
    [62] Copeland R, Balasubramaniam A, Tiwari V, et al. (2008) Using a 3-O-sulfated heparin octasaccharide to inhibit the entry of herpes simplex virus type 1. Biochemistry 47: 5774-5783. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi800205t
    [63] Kwon PS, Oh H, Kwon S-J, et al. (2020) Sulfated polysaccharides effectively inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. Cell Discov 6: 50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41421-020-00192-8
    [64] Morokutti-Kurz M, Fröba M, Graf P, et al. (2021) Iota-carrageenan neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 and inhibits viral replication in vitro. PLoS One 16: e0237480. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237480
    [65] Song S, Peng H, Wang Q, et al. (2020) Inhibitory activities of marine sulfated polysaccharides against SARS-CoV-2. Food Funct 11: 7415-7420. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0FO02017F
    [66] Marks RM, Lu H, Sundaresan R, et al. (2001) Probing the interaction of dengue virus envelope protein with heparin: Assessment of glycosaminoglycan-derived inhibitors. J Med Chem 44: 2178-2187. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm000412i
    [67] Panggabean JA, Adiguna SP, Rahmawati SI, et al. (2022) Antiviral activities of algal-based sulfated polysaccharides. Molecules 27: 1178. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041178
    [68] Huang L, Shen M, Morris GA, et al. (2019) Sulfated polysaccharides: Immunomodulation and signaling mechanisms. Trends Food Sci Tech 92: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.08.008
    [69] Schepetkin IA, Faulkner CL, Nelson-Overton LK, et al. (2005) Macrophage immunomodulatory activity of polysaccharides isolated from Juniperus scopolorum. Int Immunopharmacol 5: 1783-1799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2005.05.009
    [70] Khil'chenko SR, Zaporozhets TS, Shevchenko NM, et al. (2011) Immunostimulatory activity of fucoidan from the brown alga fucus evanescens: Role of sulfates and acetates. J Carbohyd Chem 30: 291-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/07328303.2011.604456
    [71] Ohta Y, Lee JB, Hayashi K, et al. (2007) In vivo anti-influenza virus activity of an immunomodulatory acidic polysaccharide isolated from cordyceps militaris grown on germinated soybeans. J Agric Food Chem 55: 10194-10199. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0721287
    [72] Xie G, Schepetkin IA, Siemsen DW, et al. (2008) Fractionation and characterization of biologically-active polysaccharides from Artemisia tripartita. Phytochemistry 69: 1359-1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.01.009
    [73] Xu X, Yan H, Zhang X (2012) Structure and immuno-stimulating activities of a new heteropolysaccharide from lentinula edodes. J Agric Food Chem 60: 11560-11566. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf304364c
    [74] Ramesh H (2002) Effect of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) galactomannan fractions on phagocytosis in rat macrophages and on proliferation and IgM secretion in HB4C5 cells. Carbohyd Polym 50: 79-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(01)00377-0
    [75] Engel A, Thoms S, Riebesell U, et al. (2004) Polysaccharide aggregation as a potential sink of marine dissolved organic carbon. Nature 428: 929-932. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02453
    [76] Chin WC, Orellana MV, Verdugo P (1998) Spontaneous assembly of marine dissolved organic matter into polymer gels. Nature 391: 568-572. https://doi.org/10.1038/35345
    [77] Vidal-Melgosa S, Sichert A, Francis TB, et al. (2021) Diatom fucan polysaccharide precipitates carbon during algal blooms. Nat Commun 12: 1150. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21009-6
    [78] Bernaerts TMM, Kyomugasho C, Van Looveren N, et al. (2018) Molecular and rheological characterization of different cell wall fractions of Porphyridium cruentum. Carbohyd Polym 195: 542-550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.05.001
    [79] Costa JAV, Lucas BF, Alvarenga AGP, et al. (2021) Microalgae polysaccharides: An overview of production, characterization, and potential applications. Polysaccharides 2: 759-772. https://doi.org/10.3390/polysaccharides2040046
    [80] Malkin AY, Isayev AI (2006) Concepts, methods, and applications. Appl Rheol 16: 240-241. https://doi.org/10.1515/arh-2006-0039
    [81] Fernandes HL, Lupi F, Tomé MM, et al. (1991) Rheological behaviour of the culture medium during growth of the microalga Botryococcus braunii. Bioresource Technol 38: 133-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(91)90144-9
    [82] Cho M, Yang C, Kim SM, et al. (2010) Molecular characterization and biological activities of watersoluble sulfated polysaccharides from Enteromorpha prolifera. Food Sci Biotechnol 19: 525-533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-010-0073-3
    [83] Liang Y, He J, Guo B (2021) Functional hydrogels as wound dressing to enhance wound healing. ACS Nano 15: 12687-12722. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c04206
    [84] Running CA, Falshaw R, Janaswamy S (2012) Trivalent iron induced gelation in lambda-carrageenan. Carbohydrate Polym 87: 2735-2739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.11.018
    [85] Tiwari A, Melchor-Martínez EM, Saxena A, et al. (2021) Therapeutic attributes and applied aspects of biological macromolecules (polypeptides, fucoxanthin, sterols, fatty acids, polysaccharides, and polyphenols) from diatoms — A review. Int J Biol Macromol 171: 398-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.219
    [86] Moreira JB, Vaz BDS, Cardias BB, et al. (2022) Microalgae polysaccharides: An alternative source for food production and sustainable agriculture. Polysaccharides 3: 441-457. https://doi.org/10.3390/polysaccharides3020027
    [87] Apostolova E, Lukova P, Baldzhieva A, et al. (2020) Immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects of fucoidan: A review. Polymers 12: 2338. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12102338
    [88] Zayed A, Cao HTT, Trang VTD, et al. (2023) Structural tailoring of fucoidan backbones for maximizing their benefits: Enzymatic, chemical, and physical strategies. J Appl Phycol 35: 2445-2462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-023-03036-6
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Maria João F. Marques, Dimitri Mercier, Antoine Seyeux, Sandrine Zanna, Christophe Tenailleau, Benjamin Duployer, Marc Jeannin, Philippe Marcus, Régine Basséguy, Exploring Marine Biomineralization on the Al–Mg Alloy as a Natural Process for In Situ LDH Growth to Improve Corrosion Resistance, 2025, 1944-8244, 10.1021/acsami.4c17532
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1481) PDF downloads(101) Cited by(1)

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog