The main challenge of the agricultural sector is the increasing pressure on natural resources, mainly water and arable land. Consequently, an urgent imperative arises to explore technological advancements that can boost food production in alignment with the growing demands. The Soilless Production System (SPS) emerges as a proficient approach for managing irrigation water, thereby making a significant contribution to food security. This research focuses on the efficient use of SPS and identifies the best economic use of the soilless techniques for different crops within an area characterized by limited land and water availability. The database for the study was generated through a farm survey to investigate the benefits of adopting SPSs as a sustainable agricultural practice. A linear programming approach was applied to develop an optimization model for resource allocation and crop mix selection, considering the development opportunities through the SPSs. Different scenarios were applied in the model. The results proved that adopting SPSs is a sustainable irrigation practice, since the technique promotes water use efficiency, generates profitability, and conserves the associated natural resources. The SPSs ensure sustainable use of water resources by increasing water use efficiency. The hydroponics cultivation system had 11 ± 1.7 times higher yields but required 82 ± 11 times more energy in comparison to the lettuce crop produced by the conventional production system (CPS). The result of the optimal solution shows that the total revenue of scenarios of the study is 109% of the revenue of the original value of the largest farmer. The water resources and the investment cost as constraints in the model are totally used, but the operational costs in the optimal solutions are 74% of the total operational cost in the original data. The optimal solution showed the importance of using computerized systems in which the control of the fertigation is better.
Citation: Mohamamd I. Majdalawi, Ansam A. Ghanayem, Amani A. Alassaf, Sabine Schlüter, Mohammed A. Tabieh, Amer Z. Salman, Muhanad W. Akash, Rui C. Pedroso. Economic efficient use of soilless techniques to maximize benefits for farmers[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(4): 1038-1051. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023056
The main challenge of the agricultural sector is the increasing pressure on natural resources, mainly water and arable land. Consequently, an urgent imperative arises to explore technological advancements that can boost food production in alignment with the growing demands. The Soilless Production System (SPS) emerges as a proficient approach for managing irrigation water, thereby making a significant contribution to food security. This research focuses on the efficient use of SPS and identifies the best economic use of the soilless techniques for different crops within an area characterized by limited land and water availability. The database for the study was generated through a farm survey to investigate the benefits of adopting SPSs as a sustainable agricultural practice. A linear programming approach was applied to develop an optimization model for resource allocation and crop mix selection, considering the development opportunities through the SPSs. Different scenarios were applied in the model. The results proved that adopting SPSs is a sustainable irrigation practice, since the technique promotes water use efficiency, generates profitability, and conserves the associated natural resources. The SPSs ensure sustainable use of water resources by increasing water use efficiency. The hydroponics cultivation system had 11 ± 1.7 times higher yields but required 82 ± 11 times more energy in comparison to the lettuce crop produced by the conventional production system (CPS). The result of the optimal solution shows that the total revenue of scenarios of the study is 109% of the revenue of the original value of the largest farmer. The water resources and the investment cost as constraints in the model are totally used, but the operational costs in the optimal solutions are 74% of the total operational cost in the original data. The optimal solution showed the importance of using computerized systems in which the control of the fertigation is better.
| [1] |
Basheer M, Wheeler K, Ribbe L, et al. (2018) Quantifying and evaluating the impacts of cooperation in transboundary river basins on the Water-Energy-Food nexus: The Blue Nile Basin. Sci Total Environ 630: 1309–1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.249 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.249
|
| [2] |
Majdalawi, M, Raedig C, Al-Karablieh E, et al. (2016) Integration different environmental valuation methods to estimate forest degradation in arid and semi-arid regions. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 23: 392–398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1124934 doi: 10.1080/13504509.2015.1124934
|
| [3] | United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2015) 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available from: http://www.jo.undp.org/content/jordan/en/home/post-2015/sdg-overview.html. |
| [4] |
Aerni P (2009) What is sustainable agriculture? Empirical evidence of diverging views in Switzerland and New Zealand. Ecol Econ 68: 1872–1882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.016 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.016
|
| [5] | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2012) Coping with water scarcity-An action framework for agriculture and food security. Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/i3015e/i3015e.pdf. |
| [6] | Asian productivity organization (2016) Available from: http://www.apo-tokyo.org/. |
| [7] |
Momvandi A, Omidi Najafabadi M, Hosseini J, et al. (2018) The identification of factors affecting the use of pressurized irrigation systems by farmers in Iran. Water 10: 1532. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111532 doi: 10.3390/w10111532
|
| [8] |
Fan Y, Massey R, Park S (2018) Multi-crop production decisions and economic irrigation water use efficiency: The effects of water costs, pressure irrigation adoption, and climatic determinants. Water 10: 1637. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111637 doi: 10.3390/w10111637
|
| [9] |
Borsato E, Martello M, Marinello F, et al. (2019) Environmental and economic sustainability assessment for two different sprinkler and a drip irrigation systems: A case study on maize cropping. Agriculture 9: 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9090187 doi: 10.3390/agriculture9090187
|
| [10] |
Liu J, Zhang Y, Yu Z (2018) Evaluation of physical and economic water-saving efficiency for virtual water flows related to inter-regional crop trade in China. Sustainability 10: 4308. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114308 doi: 10.3390/su10114308
|
| [11] |
Wu Y, Ma Y, Song X, et al. (2018) Responses of water fluxes and water-use efficiency of maize to warming based on Water Transformation Dynamical Processes Experimental Device (WTDPED) Experiment. Water 10: 1660. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111660 doi: 10.3390/w10111660
|
| [12] |
Nemeskéri E, Molnár K, Rácz C, et al. (2019) Effect of water supply on spectral traits and their relationship with the productivity of sweet corns. Agronomy 9: 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9020063 doi: 10.3390/agronomy9020063
|
| [13] |
Aditto S, Gan C, and Nartea G (2014) Economic risk analysis of alternative farming systems for smallholder farmers in central and north-east Thailand. Int J Soc Econ 41: 294–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-11-2012-0223 doi: 10.1108/IJSE-11-2012-0223
|
| [14] | Pedersen S, Medici M, Anken T, et al. (2019) Financial and environmental performance of integrated precision farming systems. In: Stafford JV, Precision agriculture '19, Conference Proceedings, 1030. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-888-9. |
| [15] |
Wienforth B, Knie A, Böttcher U, et al. (2018) Evaluating bioenergy cropping systems towards productivity and resource use efficiencies: An analysis based on field experiments and simulation modelling. Agronomy 8: 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8070117 doi: 10.3390/agronomy8070117
|
| [16] | Savvas D, Gianquinto G, Tuzel Y, et al. (2013) Soilless Culture. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper No. 217: Good Agricultural Practices for Greenhouse Vegetable Crops, Rome. |
| [17] | Olympios C (1999) Overview of soilless culture: Advantages, constraints and perspectives for its use in Mediterranean countries. Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes 31: 307–324. |
| [18] | Somerville C, Cohen M, Pantanella E, et al. (2014) Small-scale aquaponic food production: Integrated fish and plant farming. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 589: 1. |
| [19] | Jensen M (1997) Hydroponics worldwide. In: Papdopoulos AP, International Symposium on Growing Media and Hydroponics, 481: 719–730. |
| [20] | Polycarpou P, Neokleous D, Chimonidou D, et al. (2005) A closed system for soil less culture adapted to the Cyprus conditions. In: El Gamal F, Lamaddalen AN, Bogliotti C, et al. (Eds.), Non-conventional water use: WASAMED project. Bari: CIHEAM/EU DG Research, 237–241. |
| [21] |
Barbosa G, Gadelha F, Kublik N, et al. (2015) Comparison of land, water, and energy requirements of lettuce grown using hydroponic vs. conventional agricultural methods. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12: 6879–6891. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120606879 doi: 10.3390/ijerph120606879
|
| [22] | Schnitzler W (2013) Urban hydroponics–facts and vision. SEAVEG 2012 High Value Vegetables in Southeast Asia: Production, Supply and Demand, 285. |
| [23] |
Eigenbrod C, Gruda N (2015) Urban vegetable for food security in cities. Agron Sustain Dev 35: 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0273-y doi: 10.1007/s13593-014-0273-y
|
| [24] |
Engindeniz S, Gül A (2009) Economic analysis of soilless and soil-based greenhouse cucumber production in Turkey. Sci Agric 66: 606–614. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162009000500004 doi: 10.1590/S0103-90162009000500004
|
| [25] |
Aldeseit B, Majdalawi M, Ata M (2012) Application of linear programming technique to formulate least cost balanced ration for calves-fattening in Jordan. J Anim Vet Adv 11: 3119–3124. https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2012.3119.3124 doi: 10.3923/javaa.2012.3119.3124
|
| [26] | Majdalawi M (2003) Socio-economic impacts of the re-use of water in agriculture in Jordan, Margraf Publishers. |
| [27] | Agricultural Credit Union (ACU) (2014) Manual of Agriculture Costs and Returns, Department of Plan and studies. |
Figures(2) / Tables(3)
Mohamamd I. Majdalawi, Ansam A. Ghanayem, Amani A. Alassaf, Sabine Schlüter, Mohammed A. Tabieh, Amer Z. Salman, Muhanad W. Akash, Rui C. Pedroso. Economic efficient use of soilless techniques to maximize benefits for farmers[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(4): 1038-1051. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023056
DownLoad: