Research article Special Issues

Listen to the radio and go on field trips: A study on farmers' attributes to opt for extension methods in Northwest Ethiopia

  • Received: 01 August 2023 Revised: 29 November 2023 Accepted: 04 December 2023 Published: 12 December 2023
  • Extension professionals are expected to help disseminate agricultural technologies, information, knowledge and skills to farmers. In order to develop valuable and long-lasting extension services, it is essential to understand the methods of extension that farmers find most beneficial. This understanding helps adopt improved practices, overcome barriers, provide targeted interventions and continuously improve agricultural extension programs. Thus, assessing factors affecting farmers' choice of agricultural extension methods is essential for developing extension methods that comply with farmers' needs and socio-economic conditions. Therefore, we analyzed the factors affecting farmers' preferences in extension methods, using cross-sectional data collected from 300 households in two sample districts and 16 Kebelles in Ethiopia between September 2019 and March 2020. Four extension methods, including training, demonstration, office visits and phone calls were considered as outcome variables. We fitted a multivariate probit model to estimate the factors that influence farmers' choice of extension methods. The results of the study showed that the number of dependents in the household head, formal education and membership of Idir (an informal insurance program a community or group runs to meet emergencies) were negatively associated with farmers' choices to participate in different extension methods compared to no extension. On the other hand, the sex of the household head, farm experience, participation in non-farm activities, monetary loan access, owning a mobile phone, radio access and membership of cooperatives were found to have a statistically significant positive impact on farmers' choices of extension methods. Based on these findings, the government and the concerned stakeholders should take farmers' socio-economic and institutional traits into account when selecting and commissioning agricultural extension methods. This could help to develop contextually relevant extension strategies that are more likely to be chosen and appreciated by farmers. Furthermore, such strategies can aid policymakers in designing extension programs that cater to farmers' needs and concerns. In conclusion, farmers' socio-economic and institutional affiliation should be taken into consideration when selecting agricultural extension methods.

    Citation: Yemane Asmelash Gebremariam, Joost Dessein, Beneberu Assefa Wondimagegnhu, Mark Breusers, Lutgart Lenaerts, Enyew Adgo, Steven Van Passel, Amare Sewnet Minale, Amaury Frankl. Listen to the radio and go on field trips: A study on farmers' attributes to opt for extension methods in Northwest Ethiopia[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(1): 3-29. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024002

    Related Papers:

  • Extension professionals are expected to help disseminate agricultural technologies, information, knowledge and skills to farmers. In order to develop valuable and long-lasting extension services, it is essential to understand the methods of extension that farmers find most beneficial. This understanding helps adopt improved practices, overcome barriers, provide targeted interventions and continuously improve agricultural extension programs. Thus, assessing factors affecting farmers' choice of agricultural extension methods is essential for developing extension methods that comply with farmers' needs and socio-economic conditions. Therefore, we analyzed the factors affecting farmers' preferences in extension methods, using cross-sectional data collected from 300 households in two sample districts and 16 Kebelles in Ethiopia between September 2019 and March 2020. Four extension methods, including training, demonstration, office visits and phone calls were considered as outcome variables. We fitted a multivariate probit model to estimate the factors that influence farmers' choice of extension methods. The results of the study showed that the number of dependents in the household head, formal education and membership of Idir (an informal insurance program a community or group runs to meet emergencies) were negatively associated with farmers' choices to participate in different extension methods compared to no extension. On the other hand, the sex of the household head, farm experience, participation in non-farm activities, monetary loan access, owning a mobile phone, radio access and membership of cooperatives were found to have a statistically significant positive impact on farmers' choices of extension methods. Based on these findings, the government and the concerned stakeholders should take farmers' socio-economic and institutional traits into account when selecting and commissioning agricultural extension methods. This could help to develop contextually relevant extension strategies that are more likely to be chosen and appreciated by farmers. Furthermore, such strategies can aid policymakers in designing extension programs that cater to farmers' needs and concerns. In conclusion, farmers' socio-economic and institutional affiliation should be taken into consideration when selecting agricultural extension methods.



    加载中


    [1] Albore A (2018) Review on role and challenges of agricultural extension service on farm productivity in Ethiopia. Int J Agric Educ Ext 4: 93–100.
    [2] Elias A, Nohmi M, Yasunobu K, et al. (2016) Farmers' satisfaction with agricultural extension service and its influencing factors: a case study in North West Ethiopia. J Agric Sci Technol 18: 39–53.
    [3] Mutengwa CS, Mnkeni P, Kondwakwenda A (2023) Climate-smart agriculture and food security in Southern Africa: A review of the vulnerability of smallholder agriculture and food security to climate change. Sustainability 15: 2882. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042882 doi: 10.3390/su15042882
    [4] Swanson BE, Rajalahti R (2010) Strengthening agricultural extension and advisory systems: Procedures for assessing, transforming, and evaluating extension systems. Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper, No. 45. World Bank, Washington, DC.
    [5] Takahashi K, Muraoka R, Otsuka K (2020) Technology adoption, impact, and extension in developing countries' agriculture: A review of the recent literature. Agric Econ 51: 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12539 doi: 10.1111/agec.12539
    [6] Mapiye O, Makombe G, Molotsi A, et al. (2021) Towards a revolutionized agricultural extension system for the sustainability of smallholder livestock production in developing countries: The potential role of icts. Sustainability 13: 5868. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115868 doi: 10.3390/su13115868
    [7] Norton GW, Alwang J (2020) Changes in agricultural extension and implications for farmer adoption of new practices. Appl Econ Perspect Policy 42: 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13008 doi: 10.1002/aepp.13008
    [8] Faure G, Desjeux Y, Gasselin P (2012) New challenges in agricultural advisory services from a research perspective: A literature review, synthesis and research agenda. J Agric Educ Ext 18: 461–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2012.707063 doi: 10.1080/1389224X.2012.707063
    [9] Ali-Olub AM, Kathuri N, Wesonga TE (2011) Effective extension methods for increased food production in Kakamega District. J Agric Ext Rural Dev 3: 95–101.
    [10] Anandajayasekeram P (2008) Concepts and Practices in Agricultural Extension in Developing Countries: A Source Book. ILRI (aka ILCA and ILRAD).
    [11] Belay K (2003) Agricultural extension in Ethiopia: The case of participatory demonstration and training extension system. J Soc Dev Afr 18: 49–84. https://doi.org/10.4314/jsda.v18i1.23819 doi: 10.4314/jsda.v18i1.23819
    [12] Koehnen TL (2011) ICTs for Agricultural Extension. Global Experiments, Innovations and Experiences. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2011.624714
    [13] Mhlanga B (2006) Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) policy for change and the mask for development: A critical analysis of Zimbabwe's e‐readiness survey report. Electron J Inf Syst Dev Countries 28: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2006.tb00185.x doi: 10.1002/j.1681-4835.2006.tb00185.x
    [14] Poulton C, Dorward A, Kydd J (2010) The future of small farms: New directions for services, institutions, and intermediation. World Dev 38: 1413–1428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.009 doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.009
    [15] Snapp S, Pound B (2017) Agricultural systems: Agroecology and rural innovation for development: Agroecology and rural innovation for development. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802070-8.00002-5
    [16] Famuyiwa B, Olaniyi O, Adesoji S (2017) Appropriate extension methodologies for agricultural development in emerging economies. In: Agricultural Development and Food Security in Developing Nations, IGI Global, 82–105. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0942-4.ch004
    [17] Bukenya M, Bbale W, Buyinza M (2008) Assessment of the effectiveness of individual and group extension methods: A case study of Vi-Agroforestry Project in Uganda. Fertil Steril 82: S122.
    [18] Allahyari MS, Chizari M, Mirdamadi SM (2009) Extension-education methods to facilitate learning in sustainable agriculture. J Agric Soc Sci 5: 27–30.
    [19] Chikaire J, Nnadi F, Ejiogu-Okereke N (2011) The importance of improve extension linkages in sustainable livestock production in Sub-Saharan Africa. Cont J Anim Vet Res 3: 7–15. https://doi.org/10.5707/cjsd.2012.3.1.1.18 doi: 10.5707/cjsd.2012.3.1.1.18
    [20] Davis KE, Addom BK (2000) Sub-Saharan Africa. In: ICTs for Agricultural Extension: Global Experiments, Innovations and Experiences 407: 80–93.
    [21] Omar JA, Bakar AHA, Jais HM, et al. (2011) A reviewed study of the impact of agricultural extension methods and organizational characteristics on sustainable agricultural development. Int J Eng Sci Technol 3: 5160–5168.
    [22] Davis KE (2008) Extension in Sub-Saharan Africa: Overview and assessment of past and current models, and future prospects. J Int Agric Ext Educ 15: 15–28.
    [23] Ricker‐Gilbert J, Norton GW, Alwang J, et al. (2008) Cost‐effectiveness of alternative integrated pest management extension methods: An example from Bangladesh. Appl Econ Perspect Policy 30: 252–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2008.00403.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2008.00403.x
    [24] Eberle WM, Shroyer JP (2000) Are traditional extension methodologies extinct or just endangered? J Nat Resour Life Sci Educ 29: 135–140. https://doi.org/10.2134/jnrlse.2000.0135 doi: 10.2134/jnrlse.2000.0135
    [25] Adamsone-Fiskovica A, Grivins M, Burton RJ, et al. (2021) Disentangling critical success factors and principles of on-farm agricultural demonstration events. J Agric Educ Ext 27: 639–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2020.1844768 doi: 10.1080/1389224X.2020.1844768
    [26] Prokopy LS, Floress K, Klotthor-Weinkauf D, et al. (2008) Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: Evidence from the literature. J Soil Water Conserv 63: 300–311. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.63.5.300 doi: 10.2489/jswc.63.5.300
    [27] Ibrahim H, Zhou J, Li M, et al. (2014) Perception of farmers on extension services in North Western Part of Nigeria: The case of farming households in Kano State. J Serv Sci Manag 7: 44959. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2014.72006 doi: 10.4236/jssm.2014.72006
    [28] Mairura FS, Musafiri CM, Kiboi MN, et al. (2021) Determinants of farmers' perceptions of climate variability, mitigation, and adaptation strategies in the central highlands of Kenya. Weather Clim Extremes 34: 100374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2021.100374 doi: 10.1016/j.wace.2021.100374
    [29] Berhanu K, Poulton C (2014) The political economy of agricultural extension policy in Ethiopia: Economic growth and political control. Dev Policy Rev 32: s197–s213. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12082 doi: 10.1111/dpr.12082
    [30] Haile M, Abebaw D (2012) What factors determine the time allocation of agricultural extension agents on farmers' agricultural fields? Evidence form rural Ethiopia. J Agric Ext Rural Dev 4: 318–329.
    [31] Swanson BE, Samy MM (2002) Developing an extension partnership among public, private, and nongovernmental organizations. J Int Agric Ext Educ 9: 5–10. https://doi.org/10.5191/jiaee.2002.09101 doi: 10.5191/jiaee.2002.09101
    [32] Krishnan P, Patnam M (2014) Neighbors and extension agents in Ethiopia: Who matters more for technology adoption? Am J Agric Econ 96: 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aat017 doi: 10.1093/ajae/aat017
    [33] Baloch MA, Thapa GB (2019) Review of the agricultural extension modes and services with the focus to Balochistan, Pakistan. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 18: 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2017.05.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2017.05.001
    [34] Okello DM, Akite I, Atube F, et al. (2023) Examining the relationship between farmers' characteristics and access to agricultural extension: Empirical evidence from northern Uganda. J Agric Educ Ext 29: 439–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2022.2082500 doi: 10.1080/1389224X.2022.2082500
    [35] Tamako N, Chitja J, Mudhara M (2022) The influence of farmers' socio-economic characteristics on their choice of opinion leaders: Social knowledge systems. Systems 10: 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10010008 doi: 10.3390/systems10010008
    [36] Mittal S, Mehar M (2016) Socio-economic factors affecting adoption of modern information and communication technology by farmers in India: Analysis using multivariate probit model. J Agric Educ Ext 22: 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2014.997255 doi: 10.1080/1389224X.2014.997255
    [37] Antwi-Agyei P, Stringer LC (2021) Improving the effectiveness of agricultural extension services in supporting farmers to adapt to climate change: Insights from northeastern Ghana. Clim Risk Manag 32: 100304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2021.100304 doi: 10.1016/j.crm.2021.100304
    [38] Gebremariam YA, Dessein J, Wondimagegnhu BA, et al. (2021) Determinants of farmers' level of interaction with agricultural extension agencies in northwest Ethiopia. Sustainability 13: 3447. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063447 doi: 10.3390/su13063447
    [39] Admasu WF, Van Passel S, Nyssen J, et al. (2021) Eliciting farmers' preferences and willingness to pay for land use attributes in Northwest Ethiopia: A discrete choice experiment study. Land Use Policy 109: 105634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105634 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105634
    [40] Usman MA, Gerber N (2021) Assessing the effect of irrigation on household water quality and health: a case study in rural Ethiopia. Int J Environ Health Res 31: 433–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2019.1668544 doi: 10.1080/09603123.2019.1668544
    [41] Zewdie MC, Van Passel S, Moretti M, et al. (2020) Pathways how irrigation water affects crop revenue of smallholder farmers in northwest Ethiopia: A mixed approach. Agric Water Manag 233: 106101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106101 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106101
    [42] Arun G, Yeo J-H, Ghimire K (2019) Determinants of farm mechanization in Nepal. Turk J Agric-Food Sci Technol 7: 87–91. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v7i1.87-91.2131 doi: 10.24925/turjaf.v7i1.87-91.2131
    [43] Mohammed Kassaw H, Birhane Z, Alemayehu G (2019) Determinants of market outlet choice decision of tomato producers in Fogera woreda, South Gonder zone, Ethiopia. Cogent Food Agric 5: 1709394. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2019.1709394 doi: 10.1080/23311932.2019.1709394
    [44] Tobin J (1958) Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica: J Econ Soc: 1958: 24–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907382 doi: 10.2307/1907382
    [45] Tahirou A, Bamire A, Oparinde A, et al. (2015) Determinants of adoption of improved cassava varieties among farming households in Oyo, Benue, and Akwa Ibom states of Nigeria.
    [46] Tahirou A, Bamire A, Oparinde A, et al. (2019) Determinants of adoption of improved cassava varieties among farming households in Oyo, Benue, and Akwa Ibom States of Nigeria. Gates Open Res 3: 1343.
    [47] Das P (2019) Introduction to econometrics and statistical software. In: Econometrics in Theory and Practice, Springer, 15.1: 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9019-8_1
    [48] Dougherty C (2011) Introduction to econometrics: Oxford university press, USA.
    [49] Wooldridge JM (2015) Introductory econometrics: A modern approach: Cengage learning.
    [50] Chib S, Greenberg E (1998) Analysis of multivariate probit models. Biometrika 85: 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/85.2.347 doi: 10.1093/biomet/85.2.347
    [51] Suvedi M, Ghimire R, Kaplowitz M (2017) Farmers' participation in extension programs and technology adoption in rural Nepal: A logistic regression analysis. J Agric Educ Ext 23: 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2017.1323653 doi: 10.1080/1389224X.2017.1323653
    [52] Gebre GG, Isoda H, Amekawa Y, et al. (2019) Gender differences in the adoption of agricultural technology: The case of improved maize varieties in southern Ethiopia. Women's Stud Int Forum 76: 102264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2019.102264 doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2019.102264
    [53] Tsige M, Synnevåg G, Aune JB (2020) Gendered constraints for adopting climate-smart agriculture amongst smallholder Ethiopian women farmers. Sci Afr 7: e00250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2019.e00250 doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2019.e00250
    [54] Glazebrook T, Noll S, Opoku E (2020) Gender matters: Climate change, gender bias, and women's farming in the global South and North. Agriculture 10: 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10070267 doi: 10.3390/agriculture10070267
    [55] Mwololo H, Nzuma J, Ritho C (2019) Do farmers' socio-economic characteristics influence their preference for agricultural extension methods? Dev Pract 29: 844–853. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2019.1638344 doi: 10.1080/09614524.2019.1638344
    [56] Tran NLD, Rañola Jr RF, Ole Sander B, et al. (2020) Determinants of adoption of climate-smart agriculture technologies in rice production in Vietnam. Int J Clim Change Strategies Manag 12: 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-01-2019-0003 doi: 10.1108/IJCCSM-01-2019-0003
    [57] Asfaw S, Shiferaw B, Simtowe F, et al. (2012) Impact of modern agricultural technologies on smallholder welfare: Evidence from Tanzania and Ethiopia. Food Policy 37: 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.02.013 doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.02.013
    [58] Teklewold H, Mekonnen A, Kohlin G, et al. (2017) Does adoption of multiple climate-smart practices improve farmers' climate resilience? Empirical evidence from the Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Clim Change Econ 8: 1750001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007817500014 doi: 10.1142/S2010007817500014
    [59] FOARD (2017) Planning document for agriculture sectors. Woreta, Ethiopia: District office of Agriculture.
    [60] MOARD (2017) Planning Document for Agriculture Sectors. Merawi, Ethiopia.
    [61] Lwoga ET (2010) Bridging the agricultural knowledge and information divide: The case of selected telecenters and rural radio in Tanzania. Electron J Inf Syst Dev Countries 43: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2010.tb00310.x doi: 10.1002/j.1681-4835.2010.tb00310.x
    [62] Usman S (2016) Analysis of wheat value chain: the case of Sinana District, Bale Zone, Oromia region, Ethiopia: Haramaya University.
    [63] Balasubramanya S (2019) Effects of training duration and the role of gender on farm participation in water user associations in Southern Tajikistan: Implications for irrigation management. Agric Water Manag 216: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.01.019 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.01.019
    [64] Nyairo NM (2020) Attitudes and Perceptions of Smallholder Farmers Towards Agricultural Technologies in Western Kenya: Purdue University Graduate School.
    [65] Aker JC (2011) Dial "A" for agriculture: a review of information and communication technologies for agricultural extension in developing countries. Agric Econ 42: 631–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00545.x doi: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00545.x
    [66] Haruna S, Abdullahi Y (2013) Training of public extension agents in Nigeria and the implications for government's agricultural transformation agenda. J Agric Ext 17: 98–104. https://doi.org/10.4314/jae.v17i2.13 doi: 10.4314/jae.v17i2.13
    [67] Abrha T, Emanna B, Gebre GG (2020) Factors affecting onion market supply in Medebay Zana district, Tigray regional state, Northern Ethiopia. Cogent Food Agric 6: 1712144. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2020.1712144 doi: 10.1080/23311932.2020.1712144
    [68] Stringer LC, Fraser ED, Harris D, et al. (2020) Adaptation and development pathways for different types of farmers. Environ Sci Policy 104: 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.007 doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.007
    [69] Sumo TV, Ritho C, Irungu P (2022) Effect of farmer socio-economic characteristics on extension services demand and its intensity of use in post-conflict Liberia. Heliyon 8: e12268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12268 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12268
    [70] Hailemichael S, Haug R (2020) The use and abuse of the 'model farmer'approach in agricultural extension in Ethiopia. J Agric Educ Ext 26: 465–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2020.1757475 doi: 10.1080/1389224X.2020.1757475
    [71] Fitch JB, Soliman IA (2019) Livestock and small farmer labor supply. Migration, Mechanization, and Agricultural Labor Markets in Egypt. Routledge, 45–78. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429047107-3
    [72] Pappa E, Koutsouris A, Ingram J, et al. (2018) Structural aspects of on-farm demonstrations: Key considerations in the planning and design process. Int J Agric Ext 6: 79–90.
    [73] Dapilah F, Nielsen JØ, Friis C (2020) The role of social networks in building adaptive capacity and resilience to climate change: A case study from northern Ghana. Clim Dev 12: 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1596063 doi: 10.1080/17565529.2019.1596063
    [74] Ochieng W, Silvert CJ, Diaz J (2022) Exploring the impacts of lead farmer selection on community social learning: The case of farmer-to-farmer model: A review of literature. J Int Agric Ext Educ 29: 7–31. https://doi.org/10.4148/2831-5960.1022 doi: 10.4148/2831-5960.1022
    [75] Skaalsveen K, Ingram J, Urquhart J (2020) The role of farmers' social networks in the implementation of no-till farming practices. Agric Syst 181: 102824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102824 doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102824
    [76] Goodier R, Gebeyehu T (2017) Ethiopia's hotline aids farmers through text and voice messages. Appropriate Technol 44: 52.
    [77] Birke FM, Knierim A (2020) ICT for agriculture extension: Actor network theory for understanding the establishment of agricultural knowledge centers in South Wollo, Ethiopia. Inf Technol Dev 26: 591–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2020.1727826 doi: 10.1080/02681102.2020.1727826
    [78] Khanal S (2013) Role of radio on agricultural development: A review. Bodhi: Interdiscip J 5: 201–206. https://doi.org/10.3126/bodhi.v5i1.8054 doi: 10.3126/bodhi.v5i1.8054
    [79] Hudson HE, Leclair M, Pelletier B, et al. (2017) Using radio and interactive ICTs to improve food security among smallholder farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa. Telecommun Policy 41: 670–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.05.010 doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2017.05.010
    [80] Mhlaba P, Yusuf S (2020) Prospects of community radio broadcast as agricultural extension service delivery tool to smallholder farmers in South Africa. J New Gener Sci 18: 31–44.
    [81] Moussa B, Otoo M, Fulton J, et al. (2011) Effectiveness of alternative extension methods through radio broadcasting in West Africa. J Agric Educ Ext 17: 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2011.576826 doi: 10.1080/1389224X.2011.576826
    [82] Wordofa MG, Sassi M (2018) Smallholder farmers' participation in agricultural training and demonstration in Ethiopia: Implications for inclusive targeting by agricultural extension services. Int J Agric Sci, Res Technol Ext Educ Syst 8: 139–146.
    [83] Ofori E, Sampson GS, Vipham J. (2019) The effects of agricultural cooperatives on smallholder livelihoods and agricultural performance in Cambodia. Nat Resour Forum 43: 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12180 doi: 10.1111/1477-8947.12180
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(776) PDF downloads(218) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(2)  /  Tables(8)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog