Citation: Khaldoon Albitar, Khaled Hussainey. Sustainability, Environmental Responsibility and Innovation[J]. Green Finance, 2023, 5(1): 85-88. doi: 10.3934/GF.2023004
[1] | Gonzalo Maldonado-Guzmán . Green innovation mediates between financial innovation and business sustainability? Proof in the mexican manufacturing industry. Green Finance, 2024, 6(3): 563-584. doi: 10.3934/GF.2024021 |
[2] | Yafei Wang, Jing Liu, Xiaoran Yang, Ming Shi, Rong Ran . The mechanism of green finance's impact on enterprises' sustainable green innovation. Green Finance, 2023, 5(3): 452-478. doi: 10.3934/GF.2023018 |
[3] | Joseph F. Hair, Juan José García-Machado, Minerva Martínez-Avila . The impact of organizational compliance culture and green culture on environmental behavior: The moderating effect of environmental commitment. Green Finance, 2023, 5(4): 624-657. doi: 10.3934/GF.2023024 |
[4] | Xueying Xu, Peng Hou, Yue Liu . The impact of heterogeneous environmental regulations on the technology innovation of urban green energy: a study based on the panel threshold model. Green Finance, 2022, 4(1): 115-136. doi: 10.3934/GF.2022006 |
[5] | Zhang Jing, Gazi Md. Shakhawat Hossain, Badiuzzaman, Md. Shahinur Rahman, Najmul Hasan . Does corporate reputation play a mediating role in the association between manufacturing companies' corporate social responsibility (CSR) and financial performance?. Green Finance, 2023, 5(2): 240-264. doi: 10.3934/GF.2023010 |
[6] | Tõnis Mets, Piia Vettik-Leemet . Women in the sustainability new ventures in the digital era: Out from the shadow of the small country male-dominated startup ecosystem. Green Finance, 2024, 6(3): 383-406. doi: 10.3934/GF.2024015 |
[7] | Olli Tammekivi, Tõnis Mets, Mervi Raudsaar . The corporate entrepreneurial and innovation processes for business sustainability: A critical overview and conceptual process model development. Green Finance, 2024, 6(1): 52-77. doi: 10.3934/GF.2024003 |
[8] | Mihaela Onofrei, Bogdan Narcis Fîrțescu, Florin Oprea, Dana Claudia Cojocaru . The effects of environmental patents on renewable energy consumption. Green Finance, 2024, 6(4): 630-648. doi: 10.3934/GF.2024024 |
[9] | Sabuj Saha, Ahmed Rizvan Hasan, Kazi Rezwanul Islam, Md Asraful Islam Priom . Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) practices and firms' financial performance: Moderating role of country governance. Green Finance, 2024, 6(1): 162-198. doi: 10.3934/GF.2024007 |
[10] | Valter Franco, Susana Silva, Erika Laranjeira . Determinants for the adoption of ISO 14001: the case of Portuguese firms. Green Finance, 2023, 5(1): 68-84. doi: 10.3934/GF.2023003 |
The issue of corporate social and environmental responsibility has gained considerable scholarly attention over the past decade (Gerged et al., 2021; Qiu et al., 2016; Trumpp, & Guenther, 2017; Tapver, 2019; Li et al., 2020; Karim et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2021; Al-Shaer et al., 2022; Albitar et al., 2022). Nonetheless, corporate innovation is a crucial element for firms to achieve CER objectives and enhance firm value (Li et al., 2020). With the advancements in information technology and the growing complexity of consumer demands, CER necessitates that firms offer top-quality products and services to customers, establish mutually beneficial relationships with suppliers and clients, and develop eco-friendly products through corporate innovation, as stated by Provasnek et al. (2017), Chuang and Huang (2018), and Li et al. (2020). Corporate innovation can also generate new and improved products, which can contribute to achieving a competitive edge, expanding market share, and earning additional profits, (Martinez‐Conesa et al., 2017). Albitar et al., (2023) conclude that the adoption of eco-innovative technologies can have a positive impact on a company's commitment to addressing climate change which shows a better environmental performance.
The Guest Editors have curated a collection of papers that investigate various topics related to corporate social and environmental performance, environmental sustainability, green practices, and sustainable development.
One of the papers authored by Sra, Booth, and Cox examines whether the market recognizes and values corporations' voluntary disclosure of carbon emissions as a part of their environmental sustainability efforts. The study findings revealed that companies that disclosed their carbon information to the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) were able to increase their market value, indicating that the market recognized and valued their efforts towards environmental sustainability. The authors also compare the market value of disclosing firms to that of non-disclosing firms and discover that non-disclosing companies had a higher market value than their counterparts who chose to disclose their carbon information.
In their paper, Semenenko, Bilous, and Halhash conduct an analysis of Ukraine's regional development strategies to assess their compliance with the declared concept and goals of sustainable development. The study aims to determine the extent of funding allocated towards promoting environmentally friendly economic practices in these regions and to compare this investment against the declared measures outlined within the context of sustainable development. Through a comparison of key indicators, the authors evaluate the formal and substantive compliance of the regional development strategies with the principles of sustainable development, as well as the actual financial support allocated towards environmental development in Ukraine's regions. The findings provide insights into Ukraine's commitment to regional public policy initiatives that promote sustainable development, identifying the regions that prioritize sustainable development strategies and investments within their regional budgets.
In their paper, Kurt and Peng utilize stakeholder theory to investigate the correlation between corporate social performance (CSP) and corporate financial performance (CFP). Their study aims to address the lack of research on this topic specific to Turkey. The findings reveal that CSP can function as an intangible resource within corporate strategy, bolstering the competitive edge of Turkish enterprises. The results have important implications for policymakers in Turkey, as they underscore the need for strategic use of corporate social responsibility (CSR) to foster economic development. Moreover, the study highlights how Turkish businesses can gain the trust of stakeholders and improve investor valuation by leveraging CSR as a tool for achieving long-term, sustainable development of enterprise competitiveness and finance.
The study conducted by Rizwan, Arif, Sahar, Ali, and Abbasi examines the effect of financial resources on both environmental and financial performance in Pakistani manufacturing firms, with a focus on the mediating role of green practices (innovation). The findings suggest a positive correlation between financial resources and financial performance, whereas no significant impact was observed on environmental performance. Notably, green innovation was found to fully mediate the relationship between financial resources and financial performance, while partially mediating the relationship between financial resources and environmental performance.
Carlsen's study employs five main indicators, identified by Eurostat as key factors for achieving Sustainable Development Goal 12, to assess the performance of the 27 member states of the European Union. These indicators include resource productivity, average CO2 emissions from new passenger cars, circular material use rate, generation of waste excluding major mineral wastes, and consumption of toxic chemicals. The results reveal that France, Italy, and Malta rank highest while Bulgaria and Estonia rank lowest in terms of complying with SDG 12 targets based on the first four indicators. The study also observes a slightly positive trend in temporal development. The generation of waste emerges as the most important indicator for the entire EU, while CO2 emissions are a significant concern for France and Bulgaria, and the circular material use rate is the most critical issue for Greece.
The paper by Dzhengiz examines the impact of business case and paradoxical frames on the configuration, management, and development of sustainable alliance portfolios. The study seeks to bridge the gap between two constructs, namely organisational value frames and sustainable alliance portfolios, and offers propositions for future research to draw attention to the under-theorised portfolios of sustainability-oriented partnerships.
In Syed, Li, Junaid, and Ziaullah's study, they investigate the association among human resource management practices, relationship commitment, and sustainable performance by analyzing data from 246 manufacturing firms in Pakistan. The study finds that there is a positive correlation between human resource management practices and both relationship commitment and environmental performance. Additionally, relationship commitment is identified as a mediator in the association between human resource management practices and both environmental and economic performance.
To summarize, the aforementioned papers have examined various facets of corporate social and environmental performance, environmental sustainability, green practices, and sustainable development. These papers offer significant regulatory, policy, and research implications. We anticipate that scholars and policymakers will consider the papers in this special issue as a valuable contribution to ongoing discussions regarding sustainability, environmental responsibility, and innovation. We express our gratitude to all the referees for their constructive feedback and time spent in reviewing the papers. We would also like to extend our appreciation to all those involved with Green Finance for their guidance throughout this process.
All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] |
Albitar K, Al-Shaer H, Liu YS (2023) Corporate commitment to climate change: the effect of eco-innovation and climate governance. Res Policy 52: 104697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104697 doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104697
![]() |
[2] |
Albitar K, Borgi H, Khan M, et al. (2022) Business environmental innovation and CO2 emissions: The moderating role of environmental governance. Bus Strategy Environ. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3232 doi: 10.1002/bse.3232
![]() |
[3] |
Al-Shaer H, Albitar K, Liu J (2022) CEO power and CSR-linked compensation for corporate environmental responsibility: UK evidence. Rev Quant Financ Acc 60: 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-022-01118-z doi: 10.1007/s11156-022-01118-z
![]() |
[4] |
Chen S, Wang Y, Albitar K, et al. (2021) Does ownership concentration affect corporate environmental responsibility engagement? The mediating role of corporate leverage. Borsa Istanb Rev 21: S13–S24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.02.001 doi: 10.1016/j.bir.2021.02.001
![]() |
[5] |
Chuang SP, Huang SJ (2018) The effect of environmental corporate social responsibility on environmental performance and business competitiveness: The mediation of green information technology capital. J Bus Ethics 150: 991–1009. https://doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3167-x doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3167-x
![]() |
[6] |
Gerged AM, Albitar K, Al‐Haddad L (2021) Corporate environmental disclosure and earnings management—The moderating role of corporate governance structures. Int J Financ Econ. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2564 doi: 10.1002/ijfe.2564
![]() |
[7] | Karim AE, Albitar K, Elmarzouky M (2021) A novel measure of corporate carbon emission disclosure, the effect of capital expenditures and corporate governance. J Environ Manage 290: 112581. |
[8] |
Li Z, Liao G, Albitar K (2020) Does corporate environmental responsibility engagement affect firm value? The mediating role of corporate innovation. Bus Strategy Environ 29: 1045–1055. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2416 doi: 10.1002/bse.2416
![]() |
[9] |
Provasnek AK, Schmid E, Geissler B, Steiner G (2017) Sustainable corporate entrepreneurship: Performance and strategies toward innovation. Bus Strategy Environ 26: 521–535. https://doi:10.1002/bse.1934 doi: 10.1002/bse.1934
![]() |
[10] |
Qiu Y, Shaukat A, Tharyan R (2016) Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. British Account Rev 48: 102–116. https://doi:10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.007 doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.007
![]() |
[11] |
Tapver T (2019) CSR reporting in banks: does the composition of the board of directors matter? Quant Financ Econ 3: 286–314. https://doi:10.3934/qfe.2019.2.286 doi: 10.3934/qfe.2019.2.286
![]() |
[12] |
Trumpp C, Guenther T (2017) Too little or too much? Exploring U‐shaped relationships between corporate environmental performance and corporate financial performance. Bus Strategy Environ 26: 49–68. https://doi:10.1002/bse.1900 doi: 10.1002/bse.1900
![]() |
1. | Haoming Ding, Wei Han, Zerui Wang, Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (ESG) and Total Factor Productivity: The Mediating Role of Financing Constraints and R&D Investment, 2024, 16, 2071-1050, 9500, 10.3390/su16219500 | |
2. | Youssra Ben Romdhane, Maryam Elamine, The catalytic effect of digitalization and health measures during COVID-19 on corporate social responsibility in the African context, 2024, 1985-2517, 10.1108/JFRA-12-2023-0795 | |
3. | Qinghua Zhang, Yuhang Chen, Yilin Zhong, Junhao Zhong, The positive effects of the higher education expansion policy on urban innovation in China, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 2985, 10.3934/math.2024147 | |
4. | Li Peng, Yujie Yang, Cheng Yang, Zejun Li, Ngai Cheong, HRGCNLDA: Forecasting of lncRNA-disease association based on hierarchical refinement graph convolutional neural network, 2024, 21, 1551-0018, 4814, 10.3934/mbe.2024212 | |
5. | Qichang Xie, Dong Wang, Qianwen Bai, “Cooperation” or “competition”: Digital finance enables green technology innovation—a new assessment from dynamic spatial spillover perspectives, 2024, 93, 10590560, 587, 10.1016/j.iref.2024.04.040 | |
6. | Mohammed Benlemlih, Imane El Ouadghiri, Jonathan Peillex, Çiğdem Vural Yavaş, Crude oil price volatility and environmental performance, 2024, 367, 03014797, 121938, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121938 | |
7. | Zhenghui Li, Qinyang Lai, Jiajia He, Does digital technology enhance the global value chain position?, 2024, 24, 22148450, 856, 10.1016/j.bir.2024.04.016 | |
8. | Olli Tammekivi, Tõnis Mets, Mervi Raudsaar, The corporate entrepreneurial and innovation processes for business sustainability: A critical overview and conceptual process model development, 2024, 6, 2643-1092, 52, 10.3934/GF.2024003 | |
9. | Jinhong Wang, Yanting Xu, Factors influencing the transition of China's economic growth momentum, 2024, 6, 2689-3010, 220, 10.3934/NAR.2024010 | |
10. | Haitong Li, Lanting Lu, Ziang Lin, Tianze Meng, Digital innovation and corporate social responsibility performance: Evidence from firms' digital patents, 2024, 207, 00401625, 123626, 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123626 | |
11. | Li Cao, Jiaqi Gao, The Impact of Green Finance on Agricultural Pollution and Carbon Reduction: The Case of China, 2024, 16, 2071-1050, 5832, 10.3390/su16145832 | |
12. | Dengyun Niu, Zhihua Wang, Can ESG ratings promote green total factor productivity? Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies, 2024, 10, 24058440, e29307, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29307 | |
13. | Gaoke Liao, Yanling Li, Mengxin Wang, Contagion network of idiosyncratic volatility: Does corporate environmental responsibility matter?, 2024, 129, 01409883, 107168, 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107168 | |
14. | Muiz Abu Alia, Aladdin Dwekat, Rasmi Meqbel, Tayf Hannoun, Imtiyaz Shakhshir, Aya Naser, Can effective board drive environmental innovation? The moderating power of CSR committee, 2024, 1985-2517, 10.1108/JFRA-05-2024-0280 | |
15. | Muhammad Al Mahameed, Ahmad Abras, Using Sustainability Reporting as a Business Communication Tool to Reshape Social Relations in Times of Turmoil, 2025, 0964-4733, 10.1002/bse.4262 |