The mechanism of green finance's impact on enterprises' sustainable green innovation

Yafei Wang; Jing Liu; Xiaoran Yang; Ming Shi; Rong Ran; Yafei Wang; Jing Liu; Xiaoran Yang; Ming Shi; Rong Ran

doi:10.3934/GF.2023018

Green Finance

2023, Volume 5, Issue 3: 452-478. doi: 10.3934/GF.2023018

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

The mechanism of green finance's impact on enterprises' sustainable green innovation

1.
School of Economics and Management, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, China
2.
School of Public Policy and Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China

Received: 03 July 2023 Revised: 14 September 2023 Accepted: 23 September 2023 Published: 27 September 2023
JEL Codes: C23, G18, G32, O31

Global attention toward environmental sustainability and economic green transformation is on the rise. Green technology innovation plays a crucial role in achieving green economic development, making the study of enterprises' sustainable green innovation highly valuable. This paper aims to examine the influence mechanism of green finance on enterprises' sustainable green innovation. To achieve this, panel data from A-share-listed enterprises in Shanghai and Shenzhen between 2012 and 2020 are utilized as the basis for analysis. The results show that: (1) Green finance plays an important role in encouraging enterprises' sustainable green innovation. (2) The test of the intermediary effect reveals that green finance can stimulate enterprises' sustainable green innovation by increasing continued R & D investment. (3) The moderating mechanism test reveals that enterprise financing restrictions and enterprise debt default risk moderate the influence of green finance on enterprises' sustainable green innovation. Furthermore, for enterprises with high financial constraints and a high risk of debt default, the development of green finance is particularly important in fostering their long-term green innovation. (4) The study concludes that all four types of sustainable green innovation, namely, strategic, substantive, independent and cooperative, exhibit the promotion effect of green financial development, the intermediary effect of continuous R & D investment and the moderating effect of financing constraints. Enterprises with a higher risk of defaulting on their debt are more likely to make significant, independent and sustainable green innovations.
- green finance,
- enterprises' sustainable green innovation,
- continuous R & D investment,
- financing constraints,
- debt default risk
Citation: Yafei Wang, Jing Liu, Xiaoran Yang, Ming Shi, Rong Ran. The mechanism of green finance's impact on enterprises' sustainable green innovation[J]. Green Finance, 2023, 5(3): 452-478. doi: 10.3934/GF.2023018

Related Papers:

Abstract

Global attention toward environmental sustainability and economic green transformation is on the rise. Green technology innovation plays a crucial role in achieving green economic development, making the study of enterprises' sustainable green innovation highly valuable. This paper aims to examine the influence mechanism of green finance on enterprises' sustainable green innovation. To achieve this, panel data from A-share-listed enterprises in Shanghai and Shenzhen between 2012 and 2020 are utilized as the basis for analysis. The results show that: (1) Green finance plays an important role in encouraging enterprises' sustainable green innovation. (2) The test of the intermediary effect reveals that green finance can stimulate enterprises' sustainable green innovation by increasing continued R & D investment. (3) The moderating mechanism test reveals that enterprise financing restrictions and enterprise debt default risk moderate the influence of green finance on enterprises' sustainable green innovation. Furthermore, for enterprises with high financial constraints and a high risk of debt default, the development of green finance is particularly important in fostering their long-term green innovation. (4) The study concludes that all four types of sustainable green innovation, namely, strategic, substantive, independent and cooperative, exhibit the promotion effect of green financial development, the intermediary effect of continuous R & D investment and the moderating effect of financing constraints. Enterprises with a higher risk of defaulting on their debt are more likely to make significant, independent and sustainable green innovations.

References

[1]	Ahmad M, Ahmed Z, Bai Y, et al. (2022) Financial inclusion, technological innovations, and environmental quality: Analyzing the role of green openness. Front Environ Sci 10: 851263. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.851263 doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.851263
[2]	Andersen DC (2017) Do credit constraints favor dirty production? Theory and plant-level evidence. J Environ Econ Manage 84: 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.04.002. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.04.002
[3]	Antonioli D, Montresor S (2021) Innovation persistence in times of crisis: An analysis of Italian firms. Small Bus Econ 56: 1739–1764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00231-z doi: 10.1007/s11187-019-00231-z
[4]	Bharath ST, Tyler S (2008) Forecasting Default with the Merton Distance to Default Model. Rev Financ Stud, 1339–1369. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn044 doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhn044
[5]	Bianchini S, Pellegrino G (2019) Innovation persistence and employment dynamics. Res Policy 48: 1171–1186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.008. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.008
[6]	Cui SP, Han X, Zhang ZL (2022) Can Digital Finance Reduce the Risk of Corporate Debt Default? Account Res, 117–131. (In Chinese)
[7]	Debrah C, Darko A, Chan APC (2022) A bibliometric-qualitative literature review of green finance gap and future research directions. Clim Dev 0: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2022.2095331 doi: 10.1080/17565529.2022.2095331
[8]	Demirel P, Mazzucato M (2012) Innovation and firm growth: Is R & D worth it? Ind Innov 19: 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2012.649057 doi: 10.1080/13662716.2012.649057
[9]	Desalegn G, Tangl A (2022) Enhancing Green Finance for Inclusive Green Growth: A Systematic Approach. Sustainability 14: 7416. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127416 doi: 10.3390/su14127416
[10]	Ding J, Lu Z, Yu CH (2022) Environmental information disclosure and firms' green innovation: Evidence from China. Int Rev Econ Financ 81: 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.05.007 doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2022.05.007
[11]	Du X, Weng J, Zeng Q, et al. (2017) Do lenders applaud corporate environmental performance? Evidence from Chinese private-owned firms. J Bus Ethics 143: 179–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2758-2 doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2758-2
[12]	García-Quevedo J, Segarra-Blasco A (2018) Teruel M. Financial constraints and the failure of innovation projects. Technol Forecast Soc 127: 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.029
[13]	Geroski PA, Van Reenen J, Walters CF (1997) How persistently do firms innovate? Res Policy 26: 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00903-1
[14]	Guarascio D, Tamagni F (2019) Persistence of innovation and patterns of firm growth. Res Policy 48: 1493–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.004
[15]	Hadlock CJ, Pierce JR (2010) New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving Beyond the KZ Index. Rev Financ Stud 23: 1909–1940. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhq009 doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhq009
[16]	He L, Zhong T, Gan S (2022) Green finance and corporate environmental responsibility: Evidence from heavily polluting listed enterprises in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29: 74081–74096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21065-5 doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21065-5
[17]	He YB, Zhou H, Ding JM (2017) Research on the impact of technological diversification on the persistence of innovation at firm-level. Stud Sci Sci 35: 1896–1909. (In Chinese)
[18]	Hong M, Drakeford B, Zhang K (2020) The impact of mandatory CSR disclosure on green innovation: evidence from China. Green Financ 2: 302–322. https://doi.org/10.3934/GF.2020017 doi: 10.3934/GF.2020017
[19]	Jiang L, Wang H, Tong A, et al. (2020) The Measurement of Green Finance Development Index and Its Poverty Reduction Effect: Dynamic Panel Analysis Based on Improved Entropy Method. Discrete Dynn Nat Soc, e8851684. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8851684 doi: 10.1155/2020/8851684
[20]	Le Bas C, Mothe C, Nguyen-Thi TU (2015) The differentiated impacts of organizational innovation practices on technological innovation persistence. Eur J Innov Manage 18: 110–127. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2012-0085 doi: 10.1108/EJIM-09-2012-0085
[21]	Lee CC, Lee CC (2022) How does green finance affect green total factor productivity? Evidence from China. Energ Econ 107: 105863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105863 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105863
[22]	Manez JA, Rochina‐Barrachina ME, Sanchis A, et al. (2009) The role of sunk costs in the decision to invest in R & D. J Ind Econ 57: 712–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6451.2009.00398.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2009.00398.x
[23]	Mirza N, Afzal A, Umar M, et al. (2023) The impact of green lending on banking performance: Evidence from SME credit portfolios in the BRIC. Econ Anal Policy 77: 843–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.12.024 doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2022.12.024
[24]	Peters B (2009) Persistence of innovation: stylised facts and panel data evidence. J Technol Transfer 34: 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9072-9 doi: 10.1007/s10961-007-9072-9
[25]	Shen L, Liao XC (2020) Reform and innovation of Green Finance and Fulfilment of Corporate Social Responsibility—Evidence from the Green Finance Pilot Zones. Financ Forum 25: 69–80. https://doi.org/10.16529/j.cnki.11-4613/f.2020.10.007. (In Chinese) doi: 10.16529/j.cnki.11-4613/f.2020.10.007
[26]	Tolliver C, Fujii H, Keeley AR, et al. (2021) Green innovation and finance in Asia. Asian Econ Policy Rev 16: 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12320 doi: 10.1111/aepr.12320
[27]	Wang RZ, Zhan SK (2023) Research on the Synergistic lmpact of Digital lnclusive Finance and Green Finance on High-Quality Economic Development. Modern Econ Res, 59–70. (In Chinese)
[28]	Wang SH, Liu YW, Zhang YZ (2023) The impact of Debt Default Risk on Firm Innovation Efficiency. J Nanjing Univ Financ Econ, 44–54. (In Chinese)
[29]	Wang Y, Bai Y, Quan T, et al. (2023) Influence and effect of industrial agglomeration on urban green total factor productivity—On the regulatory role of innovation agglomeration and institutional distance. Econ Anal Policy 78: 1158–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.04.024 doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2023.04.024
[30]	Wang Y, Liu J, Zhao Z, et al. (2023) Research on carbon emission reduction effect of China's regional digital trade under the "double carbon" target––combination of the regulatory role of industrial agglomeration and carbon emissions trading mechanism. J Clean Prod, 137049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137049 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137049
[31]	Xie XM, Huo JG, Zou HL (2019) Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method. J Bus Res 101: 697–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.010
[32]	Yadav PL, Han SH, Rho JJ (2016) Impact of environmental performance on firm value for sustainable investment: Evidence from large US firms. Bus Strat Environ 25: 402–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1883 doi: 10.1002/bse.1883
[33]	Ye J, Al-Fadly A, Huy PQ, et al. (2022) The nexus among green financial development and renewable energy: Investment in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja 35: 5650–5675. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2035241 doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2022.2035241
[34]	Yu CH, Wu XQ, Zhang DY, et al. (2022) Demand for green finance: Resolving financing constraints on green innovation in China. Energ Policy 153: 112255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112255 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112255
[35]	Yu Y, Xu Q (2022) Influencing factors of enterprise r & d investment: post-subsidy, sustainability, and heterogeneity. Sustainability 14: 5759. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105759 doi: 10.3390/su14105759
[36]	Zhang Y, Li X, Xing C (2022) How does China's green credit policy affect the green innovation of high polluting enterprises? The perspective of radical and incremental innovations. J Clean Prod 336: 130387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130387 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130387

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)