Research article

Behavioral factors and capital structure: identification and prioritization of influential factors

  • Our objective of this research was to identify and rank the factors that influence the capital structure decisions of Iranian companies, focusing on the role of behavioral elements as intermediaries. To construct the research framework, we employed a two-phase, mixed-method design that encompassed both qualitative insights and quantitative methodologies. In the qualitative phase, experts in the capital market are consulted using a snowball sampling technique, and key research factors were identified through coding analysis. Subsequently, for the quantitative phase, managers from leading Tehran Stock Exchange–listed companies were surveyed to prioritize the model components via the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Moreover, Factor Analysis with expert feedback using structural equation modeling (SEM) were performed in the model. Initially, we identified 63 concepts, later refined to 58 after expert consultation, and categorized them into behavioral, macroeconomic, political, socio-cultural, corporate characteristics, and governance factors. Quantitative analysis revealed that macroeconomic factors exhibit the highest influence (0.266), followed by behavioral factors (0.230), corporate governance (0.201), company-specific characteristics (0.141), political factors (0.103), and socio-cultural factors (0.059) in shaping financial structures. This research thus offers a more detailed examination of how behavioral biases and broader market conditions are converged to influence capital structure, underscoring the importance of integrating cognitive perspectives—particularly those of financial managers—into corporate decision-making processes. Future investigations can be benefited from integrating broader market data, such as share price movements, to further refine insights into the dynamic interplay of behavior and capital structure.

    Citation: Ehsan Ahmadi, Parastoo Mohammadi, Farimah Mokhatab Rafei, Shib Sankar Sana. Behavioral factors and capital structure: identification and prioritization of influential factors[J]. Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2025, 5(1): 76-104. doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2025005

    Related Papers:

    [1] Alma Mašić, Hermann J. Eberl . On optimization of substrate removal in a bioreactor with wall attached and suspended bacteria. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2014, 11(5): 1139-1166. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.1139
    [2] Maryam Basiri, Frithjof Lutscher, Abbas Moameni . Traveling waves in a free boundary problem for the spread of ecosystem engineers. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2025, 22(1): 152-184. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2025008
    [3] Fadoua El Moustaid, Amina Eladdadi, Lafras Uys . Modeling bacterial attachment to surfaces as an early stage of biofilm development. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2013, 10(3): 821-842. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.821
    [4] Ana I. Muñoz, José Ignacio Tello . Mathematical analysis and numerical simulation of a model of morphogenesis. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2011, 8(4): 1035-1059. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.1035
    [5] Fabiana Russo, Alberto Tenore, Maria Rosaria Mattei, Luigi Frunzo . Multiscale modelling of the start-up process of anammox-based granular reactors. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(10): 10374-10406. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022486
    [6] Peter W. Bates, Jianing Chen, Mingji Zhang . Dynamics of ionic flows via Poisson-Nernst-Planck systems with local hard-sphere potentials: Competition between cations. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(4): 3736-3766. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020210
    [7] Chiu-Yen Kao, Yuan Lou, Eiji Yanagida . Principal eigenvalue for an elliptic problem with indefinite weight on cylindrical domains. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2008, 5(2): 315-335. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2008.5.315
    [8] Nikodem J. Poplawski, Abbas Shirinifard, Maciej Swat, James A. Glazier . Simulation of single-species bacterial-biofilm growth using the Glazier-Graner-Hogeweg model and the CompuCell3D modeling environment. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2008, 5(2): 355-388. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2008.5.355
    [9] Min Zhu, Xiaofei Guo, Zhigui Lin . The risk index for an SIR epidemic model and spatial spreading of the infectious disease. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2017, 14(5&6): 1565-1583. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017081
    [10] Blaise Faugeras, Olivier Maury . An advection-diffusion-reaction size-structured fish population dynamics model combined with a statistical parameter estimation procedure: Application to the Indian Ocean skipjack tuna fishery. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2005, 2(4): 719-741. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2005.2.719
  • Our objective of this research was to identify and rank the factors that influence the capital structure decisions of Iranian companies, focusing on the role of behavioral elements as intermediaries. To construct the research framework, we employed a two-phase, mixed-method design that encompassed both qualitative insights and quantitative methodologies. In the qualitative phase, experts in the capital market are consulted using a snowball sampling technique, and key research factors were identified through coding analysis. Subsequently, for the quantitative phase, managers from leading Tehran Stock Exchange–listed companies were surveyed to prioritize the model components via the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Moreover, Factor Analysis with expert feedback using structural equation modeling (SEM) were performed in the model. Initially, we identified 63 concepts, later refined to 58 after expert consultation, and categorized them into behavioral, macroeconomic, political, socio-cultural, corporate characteristics, and governance factors. Quantitative analysis revealed that macroeconomic factors exhibit the highest influence (0.266), followed by behavioral factors (0.230), corporate governance (0.201), company-specific characteristics (0.141), political factors (0.103), and socio-cultural factors (0.059) in shaping financial structures. This research thus offers a more detailed examination of how behavioral biases and broader market conditions are converged to influence capital structure, underscoring the importance of integrating cognitive perspectives—particularly those of financial managers—into corporate decision-making processes. Future investigations can be benefited from integrating broader market data, such as share price movements, to further refine insights into the dynamic interplay of behavior and capital structure.



    The electronic medical records (EMRs), sometimes called electronic health records (EHRs) or electronic patient records (EPRs), is one of the most important types of clinical data and often contains valuable and detailed patient information for many clinical applications. This paper studies the technology of structuring EMRs and medical information extraction, which are key foundations for health-related various applications.

    As a kind of medical information extraction technology, the medical assertion classification (MAC) in EMRs, which is formally defined for the 2010 i2b2/VA Challenge, aims to recognize the relationship between medical entities (Disease and Symptom) and patients. Given a medical problem or entity mentioned in a clinical text, an assertion classifier must look at the context and choose the status of how the medical problem pertains to the patient by assigning one of seven labels: present, absent, conditional, possible, family, occasional, or history. The assertion is reflected in two aspects: whether the entity occurs to the patient, and how the entity occurs to the patient. As the basis of medical information processing, assertion classification in EMRs is of great importance to many EMRs mining tasks. When there are many researches about MAC for English EMRs, few studies have been done on Chinese texts.

    Based on the above, we study the MAC methods for Chinese EMRs in this paper. According to the corresponding task of the 2010 i2b2/VA Challenge, we divide the assertion categories of medical entity into seven categories: present (当前的), possible (可能的), conditional (有条件的), family (非患者的), occasional (偶有的), absent (否认的) and history (既往的). The definitions and Chinese sentence examples of different kind of assertion category are shown in the Table 1.

    Table 1.  Definition of assertion categories.
    Category Definition Example sentence
    Present Symptoms or illness that must be present in the patient 患者意识昏迷8小时(The patient was unconscious for 8 hours.)
    Absent A denial of illness or symptoms 患者无眩晕头痛(No vertigo, no headache)
    Conditional A condition or illness that occurs only under certain conditions 饮酒后易休克(Shock after drinking)
    Possible Possible disease or symptom 术后可能有红肿现象(Postoperative redness may occur)
    肿瘤待查(Tumor waiting for investigation)
    Family A condition or condition that is not the patient's own 直系亲属患有癫痫病史(History of epilepsy in immediate relatives)
    Occasional An illness or symptom that does not currently occur frequently 偶有头晕症状(Occasionally dizziness)
    History Past illnesses or symptoms 2年前因痛风入我院治疗(Gout was admitted to our hospital two years ago for treatment)

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Although there have been lot of methods proposed for recognizing entity assertion category from EMRs, most of them used traditional machine methods such as Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Conditional Random Field (CRF), which are mainly based on feature engineering. However, feature engineering is relatively time-consuming and costly, and resulting feature sets are both domain and model-specific. While deep neural network approaches on various medical information extraction tasks have achieved better performance compared to traditional machine learning models, research on entity assertion classification of EMRs using deep neural network model is still few.

    Therefore, this paper proposes a novel model for MAC of Chinese EMRs. We build a deep network (called GRU-Softmax) as baseline, which combines Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) neural network (a type of Recurrent Neural Networks, RNNs) and softmax, to classify named entity assertion from Chinese EMR. Compared with RNN, the advantage of GRU-Softmax lie in that GRU neural networks have strong expressive ability to capture long context without time-intensive feature engineering.

    Furthermore, in order to obtain character level characteristics in EMRs text, we train Chinese character-level embedding representation using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and combine them with word-level embedding vector acquired from large-scale background training corpus. Then the combined vectors are sent to GRU architecture to train entity assertion classification model. In addition, to enhance the representation and distinguish ability of characters and their contexts, we integrate the medical knowledge attention (MKA) learned from entity names and their definition or descriptions in medical dictionary bases (MDBs) in the model.

    On the whole, the contributions of this work can be summarized as follow: (1) we introduce a deep neural network that combines GRU neural networks and Sfotmax to classify medical assertion at first time; (2) We compared the influence of character-level representation extracted by CNN on the model; (3) we use medical knowledge attention (MKA) to integrate entity representation from external knowledge (medical dictionary bases, MDBs).

    The remainder of this paper is composed as follows. In section 2 we summarize the related work about MAC. In section 3 we present our attention-based CNN-GRU-Softmax network model for MAC in Chinese EMRs. In section 4 we show the experimental results and give some analysis. Finally, we summarize our work and outline some ideas for future research.

    Research of entity assertion classification is to study the relation classification between entity and patient on the basis of entity known. Chapman et al. [1] proposed a classification model named as NegEx based on regular expression rules, which classifies disease entity as "existing" or "nonexistent", and can obtain 85.3% of F value on more than 1000 disease entities. Based on NegEx method and combining regular expression rules and trigger words, Harkema et al. [2] proposed the ConText method to classify the disease entities into one of six categories. On six different types of medical records, 76% to 93% of F values could be obtained, indicating that the distribution of modified disease entities varied greatly in different styles of texts.

    Based on the evaluation data of the 2010 i2b2 Challenge, researchers proposed many classification methods based on rules, SVM, CRF, etc. The most effective concept extraction systems used support vector machines (SVMs) [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11], either with contextual information and dictionaries that indicate negation, uncertainty, and family history [6,10], or with the output of rule-based systems [3,6,8]. Roberts et al. [4] and Chang et al. [11] utilized both medical dictionary and rules. Chang et al. complemented SVM with logistic regression, multi-logistic regression, and boosting, which they combined using voting mechanism. The highest classification effect in the evaluation was obtained by the Bi-level classifier proposed by de Bruijn et al. [5], who used the cTAKES knowledge base created an ensemble whose final output was determined by a multi-class SVM, and the evaluation result F could reach 93.6%. Clark et al. [12] used a CRF model to determine negation and uncertainty with their scope, and added sets of rules to separate documents into different zones, to identify and scope cue phrases, and determine phrase status. They combined the results from the found cues and the phrase status module with a maximum entropy classifier that also used concept and contextual features.

    In this paper, we propose a neural network architecture combining GRU-CNN-Softmax network with Medical Knowledge Attention that will learn the shared semantics between medical record texts and the mentioned entities in the medical dictionary bases (MDBs). The architecture of our proposed model is shown in Figure 1. After querying pretrained character embedding tables, the input sentence will be transformed respectively to the corresponding sequences of pretrained character embeddings and random generated character embedding matrixes for every character. Then a CNN is used to form the character level representation and a GRU is used to encode the sentence representation after concatenating the pretrained character embeddings and character-level representation of the sentence. Afterwards, we treat the entity information from MKBs as a query guidance and integrate them with the original sentence representation using a multi-modal fusion gate and a filtering gate. At last, a Softmax layer is used to classify.

    Figure 1.  The framework of our model. The right part is the GMF and Filtering Gate.

    As described in Figure 2, we firstly train Chinese character embeddings from a large unlabeled Chinese EMR corpus, then CNN is used to generate sentence character-level representation from the character embedding matrix sequence to alleviate rare character problems and capture helpful morphological information like special characters in EMRs. Since the length of sentences is not consistent, a placeholder (padding) is added to the left and right side of character embeddings matrix to make the length of every sentence character-level representation vector matrix sequence equal.

    Figure 2.  Character-level representation of a sentence by CNN.

    The Gate Recurrent Unit (GRU) is a branch of the Recurrent Neural Network (RNN). Like LSTM, it is proposed to solve such problems as the gradient in long-term memory and reverse propagation. We choose to use GRU [13] in our model since it performs similarly to LSTM [14] but is computationally cheaper.

    The GRU model is defined by the following equations:

    zt=σ(Wzxt+Uzht1+bz) (1)
    rt=σ(Wrxt+Urht1+br) (2)
    ˜ht%=tanh(Whxt+Uh(ht1rt)+bh) (3)
    ˜ht%=tanh(Whxt+Uh(ht1rt)+bh) (4)

    In particular, zt and rt are vectors corresponding to the update and reset gates respectively, where * denotes elementwise multiplication. The activations of both gates are elementwise logistic sigmoid functions σ(), constraining the values of zt and rt ranging from 0 to 1. ht represents the output state vector for the current time framet, while ˜ht% is the candidate state obtained with a hyperbolic tangent. The network is fed by the current input vectorxt(sentence representation of previous layer), and the parameters of the model are Wz, Wr, Wh (the feed-forward connections), Uz, Ur, Uh(the recurrent weights), and the bias vectors bz, br, bh. The Gate Recurrent Unit (GRU) is shown in Figure 3.

    Figure 3.  The architecture of gate recurrent unit (GRU).

    Concerning rich entity mention and definition information containing in MDBs, the medical knowledge attention is applied to integrate entity representations learned from external knowledge bases as query vector for encoding. We use a medical dictionary to encode entity information (entity mention and definition) into attention scores as entity embeddings.

    at=f(eWAht) (5)

    Where e is the embedding for entity, and WA is a bi-linear parameter matrix. We simply choose the quadratic function f(x) = x2, which is positive definite and easily differentiate.

    Based on the output of GRU and attention scoring, we design a gated multimodal fusion (GMF) method to fuse the features from output of hidden layerhtand attention scoringat. When predicting the entity tag of a character, the GMF trades off how much new information of the network is considering from the query vector with the EMR text containing the character. The GMF is defined as:

    hat=tanh(Watat+bat) (6)
    hht=tanh(Whtht+bht) (7)
    gt=σ(Wgt(hathht)) (8)
    mt=gthat+(1gt)hht (9)

    where Wat, Wht, Wgt are parameters, hht and hat are the new sentence vector and new query vector respectively, after transformation by single layer perceptron. is the concatenating operation, σ is the logistic sigmoid activation, gt is the gate applied to the new query vector hht, and mt is the multi-modal fused feature from the new medical knowledge feature and the new textual feature.

    When decoding the combination of the multimodal fusion feature mt at position t, the impact and necessity of the external medical knowledge feature for different assertion is different. Because the multimodal fusion feature contains external knowledge feature more or less and it may introduce some noise. We therefore use a filtering gate to combine different features from different signal that better represent the useful information. The filtering gate is a scalar in the range of [0, 1] and its value depends on how much the multimodal fusion feature is helpful to label the tag of the assertion. stand the input feature to the decoder ˆmt are defined as follows:

    st=σ(Wst,htht(Wmt,stmt+bmt,st)) (10)
    ut=st(tanh(Wmtmt+bmt)) (11)
    ˆmt=Wˆmt(htut) (12)

    where Wmt,st, Wst,ht, Wmt, Wˆmt are parameters, ht is the hidden state of bidirectional LSTM at time t, ut is the reserved multimodal features after the filtering gate filter out noise, andis the concatenating operation. The architecture of gated multimodal fusion and filtering gate are shown in Figure 1.

    After we get the representation ˆmt of sentence, we use softmax function to normalize and output entity assertion probability.

    In this section, we evaluate our method on a manually annotated dataset. Following Nadeau et al., we use Precision, Recall, and F1 to evaluate the performance of the models [18].

    We use our own manually annotated corpus as evaluation dataset, which consists of 800 de-identified EMR texts from different clinical departments of a grade-A hospital of second class in Gansu Province. The annotated entity number of every entity assertion category in the dataset is shown in the Table 2.

    Table 2.  Number statistics of different entity assertion categories in the evaluation dataset.
    Category Training Test Total
    Present (当前的) 2025 1013 3038
    Absent (否认的) 1877 921 2799
    Conditional (有条件的) 204 102 306
    Possible (可能的) 844 420 1264
    Family (非患者本人的) 235 117 352
    Occasional (偶有的) 249 147 396
    History (既往的) 342 171 513
    Total 5778 2889 8667

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    We use Google's Word2Vec to train Chinese character embeddings on our 30 thousand unlabeled Chinese EMR texts which is from a grade-A hospital of second class in Gansu Province. Random generated character embeddings are initialized with uniform samples from[3dim,3dim], where we set dim = 30.

    Table 3 gives the chosen hyper-parameters for all experiments. We tune the hyper-parameters on the development set by random search. We try to share as many hyper-parameters as possible in experiments.

    Table 3.  Parameter Setting.
    Parameter Value
    Character-level representation size 50
    Pretrained character Embedding Size 100
    Learning Size 0.014
    Decay Rate 0.05
    Dropout 0.5
    Batch Size 10
    CNN Window Size 3
    CNN Number of filters 50

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In this part, we describe all of models in the following experimental comparison.

    GRU+Softmax: We combine gated recurrent unit (GRU) neural network and Sfotmaxto classify assertion of clinical named entity. In this model, the GRU neural network is used to help encoding character embedding vector and then the Softmax layer is used to decode and classify. To compare the impact of different methods on experimental performance, we will use this model as the baseline.

    CNN+GRU+Softmax: This model is similar to the CNN-LSTM-CRF which was proposed by Ma and Hovy (2016)[15] and is a truly end-to-end system.

    CGAtS(CNN+GRU+Attention+Softmax): This model is the CNN-GRU-Softmax architecture enhanced by medical knowledge attention (MKA). In this model the output of hidden layer h and the attention score a are used to encode text representation as follows:

    c=Li=1aihi (13)

    where L is the window size of text characters.

    CGAtFuFiS(CNN+GRU+Softmax+All): This is our model. Unlike the previous one, we employed a gated multi-modal fusion (GMF) mechanism and a filtration gate.

    The performance on each of seven categories obtained by all models are shown in Figure 4, and their overall performance on the evaluation dataset is shown in Table 4.

    Figure 4.  Experimental results of different assertion categories.
    Table 4.  Performance of different models on the total evaluation dataset.
    Model Precision (%) Recall (%) F1 (%)
    Softmax 89.13 88.31 88.72
    GRU+Softmax(Baseline) 90.21 90.77 90.49
    CNN-GRU-Softmax 92.95 89.65 91.27
    CGAtS 90.76 93.34 92.03
    CGAtFuFiS 92.19 93.48 92.84

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    We compare our model with the baseline. Table 4 shows the overall assertion classification performance obtained by our method and others, from which we can see that our model CGAtFuFiS obtains the best F1-score of 92.84%.

    The experimental results of different models on our manually annotated datasets are shown in Table 4 and 5. Compared with the baseline model, all other models have improved performance and the updated neural network model is better than the traditional machine learning methods on the MAC task.

    The convolution layer in convolution neural network can well describe the local features of characters, and the most representative part of the local features can be further extracted through the pooling layer. Therefore, our experimental results show that CNN-GRU-Softmax model is superior to GRU-CRF model.The performance of the CGAtS model is better than CNN-GRU-Softmax. This result shows that, the rich information of entities and their corresponding semantic definition from MDBs is surely useful for MAC. CGAtFuFiS model is slightly better than CGAtS model and indicates that for the clinical NER task in Chinese EMRs it is helpful to fuse the features from EMR text context with the external knowledge dictionary utilizing gated multimodal fusion (GMF). Since supplement of external information in MKBs sometimes causes noise to the model, we therefore use a filtering gate to combine and weight different features. As shown by the experimental results, the filtering gate is helpful to improve the overall performance of our model.

    Due to the sublanguage characteristic of Chinese EMRs, the expression of clinical named entity is very different from those in general text. Using the entity information contained in the MABs as the classification query vector can lead the decoder to focus on the entity itself. We combine text itself and MABs features together with a multi-modal fusion gate as the query vector, then set up a filtering gate to filter out useless feature information. The experimental results show that our model CGAtFuFiS, which integrates CNN, GRU, medical knowledge attention, gated multimodal fusion, filtering gate, and Softmax, achieves the best F1 score on the evaluation corpus.

    In this work, we proposed a medical knowledge-attention enhanced neural clinical entity assertion classification model, which makes use of the external MABs in the way of attention mechanism. A gated multi-modal fusion module is introduced to decide how much MABs information is fused into the query vector at each time step. We further introduced a filtering gate module to adaptively adjust how much multi-modal information can be considered at each time step. The experimental results on the manually annotated Chinese EMR evaluation dataset show that our proposed approach improved the performance of MAC task obviously compared to other baseline models.

    In the future, we will explore a fine-grained clinical entity classification model for Chinese EMRs and method to extract entity semantic relation in Chinese EMRs.

    We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. The research work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 61762081, No.61662067, No. 61662068) and the Key Research and Development Project of Gansu Province (No. 17YF1GA016).

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.



    [1] Ahmad M (2024) The role of cognitive heuristic-driven biases in investment management activities and market efficiency: a research synthesis. Int J of Emer Mark 19: 273-321. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-07-2020-0749 doi: 10.1108/IJOEM-07-2020-0749
    [2] Ah Mand A, Janor H, Abdul RR, Sarmidi T (2023) Herding behavior and stock market conditions. PSU Res Rev 7: 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1108/PRR-10-2020-0033 doi: 10.1108/PRR-10-2020-0033
    [3] Aibar-Guzmán B, García-Sánchez IM, Aibar-Guzmán C, et al. (2022) Sustainable product innovation in agri-food industry: Do ownership structure and capital structure matter? J Innov Knowl 7: 100160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2021.100160 doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2021.100160
    [4] Al‐Zoubi HA, O’Sullivan JA, Al‐Maghyereh AI, et al. (2022) Disentangling sentiment from cyclicality in firm capital structure. ABACUS 59: 570-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12274 doi: 10.1111/abac.12274
    [5] Alves P, Couto EB, Francisco PM (2015) Board of directors' composition and capital structure. Res Int Bus Financ 35: 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.03.005 doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.03.005
    [6] Badheka GT, Pandya K (2022) Behavioural Capital Structure: A Systematic Literature Review on the Role of Psychological Factors in Determining the Capital Structure. Int J Financ Manag 12: 1–9. doi: 10.22495/rcgv6i4c1art13 doi: 10.22495/rcgv6i4c1art13
    [7] Banerjee S, Humphery-Jenner M, Nanda V (2018) Does CEO bias escalate repurchase activity? J Bank Financ 93: 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.02.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.02.003
    [8] Barton SL, Gordon PJ (1988) Corporate strategy and capital structure. Strategic Manage J 9: 623–632. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090608 doi: 10.1002/smj.4250090608
    [9] Baker M, Wurgler J (2002) Market timing and capital structure. J Financ 57: 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00414 doi: 10.1111/1540-6261.00414
    [10] Bokpin GA(2010) Financial market development and corporate financing: evidence from emerging market economies. J of Eco Stud 37: 96-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443581011012270
    [11] Bradley M, Jarrell GA, Kim EH (1984) On the existence of an optimal capital structure: Theory and evidence. J Financ 39: 857–878. https://doi.org/10.2307/2327950 doi: 10.2307/2327950
    [12] Çam İ, Özer G (2022) The influence of country governance on the capital structure and investment financing decisions of firms: An international investigation. Borsa Istanb Rev 22: 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.04.008 doi: 10.1016/j.bir.2021.04.008
    [13] Carrizosa R, Gaertner FB, Lynch D (2020) Debt and Taxes? The Effect of TCJA Interest Limitations on Capital Structure. Available at SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3397285 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3397285
    [14] Carrizosa RD, Gaertner FB, Lynch DP (2023) Debt and taxes? The effect of Tax Cuts & Jobs Act of 2017 interest limitations on capital structure. J Am Tax Assoc 45: 35–55. https://doi.org/10.2308/JATA-2021-010 doi: 10.2308/JATA-2021-010
    [15] Chauhan Y, Jaiswall M, Goyal V (2022) Does societal trust affect corporate capital structure? Emerg Mark Rev 51: 100845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2021.100845 doi: 10.1016/j.ememar.2021.100845
    [16] Choi PMS, Choi JH, Chung CY, et al. (2020) Corporate governance and capital structure: Evidence from sustainable institutional ownership. Sustainability 12: 4190. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104190 doi: 10.3390/su12104190
    [17] Chua M, Ab Razak NH, Nassir AM, et al. (2022) Dynamic capital structure in Indonesia: does the education and experience of CEOs matter? Asia Pac Manag Rev 27: 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.05.003 doi: 10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.05.003
    [18] Costa DF, de Melo Carvalho F, de Melo Moreira BC, et al. (2017) Bibliometric analysis on the association between behavioral finance and decision making with cognitive biases such as overconfidence, anchoring effect and confirmation bias. Scientometrics 111: 1775–1799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2371-5 doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2371-5
    [19] Danso A, Fosu S, Owusu‐Agyei S, et al. (2021) Capital structure revisited. Do crisis and competition matter in a Keiretsu corporate structure? Int J Financ Econ 26: 5073–5092. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2055 doi: 10.1002/ijfe.2055
    [20] Faysal S, Salehi M, Moradi M (2020) Impact of corporate governance mechanisms on the cost of equity capital in emerging markets. J of Pub Affairs 21: e2166. 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2166
    [21] Fama EF (1970) Efficient capital markets. J Financ 25: 383–417. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226426983-007 doi: 10.7208/9780226426983-007
    [22] Fama EF, French KR (1998) Taxes, financing decisions, and firm value. J Financ 53: 819–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00036 doi: 10.1111/0022-1082.00036
    [23] Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18: 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104 doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104
    [24] Frank MZ, Goyal VK (2003) Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure. J Financ Econ 67: 217–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00252-0 doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00252-0
    [25] Frank MZ, Goyal VK (2009) Capital structure decisions: which factors are reliably important? Financ Manage 38: 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2009.01026.x doi: 10.1111/j.1755-053X.2009.01026.x
    [26] Frankfurter GM, McGoun EG (2002) Resistance is futile: the assimilation of behavioral finance. J Econ Behav Organ 48: 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00241-4 doi: 10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00241-4
    [27] Graham JR, Harvey CR, Puri M (2013) Managerial attitudes and corporate actions. J Financ Econ 109: 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.01.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.01.010
    [28] Guenzel M, Malmendier U (2020) Behavioral corporate finance: The life cycle of a CEO career (No. w27635). Natl Bureau Econ Res. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27635. doi: 10.3386/w27635
    [29] Guizani M, Ajmi AN (2021) The financial determinants of corporate cash holdings: Does sharia-compliance. Mont J of Eco 17: 157-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2021.17-3.13 doi: 10.14254/1800-5845/2021.17-3.13
    [30] Heaton JB (2002) Managerial optimism and corporate finance. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT-TAMPA, 31: 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400829125-022 doi: 10.1515/9781400829125-022
    [31] Jensen MC, Meckling WH (2019) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. In: Corporate Governance, 77–132. Gower. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
    [32] Jansen K, Michiels A, Voordeckers W et al. (2023) Financing decisions in private family firms: a family firm pecking order. Small Bus Econ 61: 495–515 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00711-9 doi: 10.1007/s11187-022-00711-9
    [33] Jiang W, Li J, Sun G (2021) Economic policy uncertainty and stock markets: A multifractal cross-correlations analysis. Fluct and Noi Lett 22: Article no. 2150018. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219477521500188 doi: 10.1142/S0219477521500188
    [34] Lapinski MK, Kerr JM, Miller Ⅲ HW, et al. (2024) Persuasive Communication, Financial Incentives, and Social Norms: Interactions and Effects on Behaviors. Curr Opin Psychol 101851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101851 doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101851
    [35] Liu Y, Liu Y, Wei Z (2022) Property rights protection, financial constraint, and capital structure choices: Evidence from a Chinese natural experiment. J Corp Financ 73: 102167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102167 doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102167
    [36] Li X, Chen K, Yuan GX, et al. (2021) The decision‐making of optimal equity and capital structure based on dynamical risk profiles: A Langevin system framework for SME growth. Int J Intell Syst 36: 3500–3523. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22424 doi: 10.1002/int.22424
    [37] Mapela L, Chipeta C (2023) Managerial confidence and capital structure announcement effects on share prices on the Johannesburg Share Exchange. South African J Econ Manag Sci 26: 4849. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v26i1.4849 doi: 10.4102/sajems.v26i1.4849
    [38] Miller EM (1977) Risk, uncertainty, and divergence of opinion. J Financ 32: 1151–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03317.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03317.x
    [39] Modigliani F, Miller M H (1958) The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The Amer Eco Rev 48: 261-296. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1809766
    [40] Mogha V, Williams B (2021) Culture and capital structure: What else to the puzzle? Int Rev Financ Anal 73: 101614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101614 doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101614
    [41] Mundi HS (2022) CEO social capital and capital structure complexity. J Behav Exp Financ 35: 100719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100719 doi: 10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100719
    [42] Muhammad AUR (2022) The impact of investor sentiment on returns, cash flows, discount rates, and performance. Borsa Istanbul Revi 22: 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.06.005 doi: 10.1016/j.bir.2021.06.005
    [43] Myers SC (1984) The Capital Structure Puzzle. J Financ 39: 574–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03646.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03646.x
    [44] Oprean C (2014) Effects of behavioural factors on human financial decisions. Procedia Econ Financ 16: 458–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00825-9 doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00825-9
    [45] Orlova S, Harper JT, Sun L (2020) Determinants of capital structure complexity. J Econ Bus 110: 105905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2020.105905 doi: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2020.105905
    [46] Pérez J, Reyna M, Vera-Martinez J (2019) Capital structure construct: a new approach to behavioral finance. Invest Manage Financ Innov 16: 86–97. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(4).2019.08 doi: 10.21511/imfi.16(4).2019.08
    [47] Rashid M, Hj DSNKP, Izadi S (2023) National culture and capital structure of the Shariah compliant firms: Evidence from Malaysia, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. Int Rev Econ Financ 86: 949–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.10.006 doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2020.10.006
    [48] Sajid M, Mushtaq R, Murtaza G, et al. (2024) Financial literacy, confidence and well-being: The mediating role of financial behavior. J Bus Res 182: 114791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114791 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114791
    [49] Salam A Z, Shourkashti R (2019) Capital structure and firm performance in emerging market: An empirical analysis of Malaysian companies. Int J of Acad Res in Accou, Finan and Manag Sci 9: 70–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v9-i3/6334 doi: 10.6007/IJARAFMS/v9-i3/6334
    [50] Singh BP, Kannadhasan M (2020) Corruption and capital structure in emerging markets: A panel quantile regression approach. J Behav Expe Financ 28: 100417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100417 doi: 10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100417
    [51] Shahmi MA (2023) Interaction of variable macroeconomic shock and monetary interventions on the profitability of Sharia commercial banking in Indonesia. Imara:J Riset Ekon Islam 7: 11-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.31958/imara.v7i1.9360 doi: 10.31958/imara.v7i1.9360
    [52] Sunitha K (2024) Targeting Behavior and Capital Structure Theories: An Empirical Analysis of Gulf Cooperation Council Countries. J Behav Expe Financ 100944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2024.100944 doi: 10.1016/j.jbef.2024.100944
    [53] Tenenhaus A, Tenenhaus M (2011) Regularized generalized canonical correlation analysis. Psychometrika 76: 257–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-011-9206-8 doi: 10.1007/s11336-011-9206-8
    [54] Thaler RH (1999) The end of behavioral finance. Financ Anal J 55: 12–17. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v55.n6.2310 doi: 10.2469/faj.v55.n6.2310
    [55] Ting IWK, Lean HH, Kweh QL, et al. (2016) Managerial overconfidence, government intervention and corporate financing decision. Int J Manag Financ 12: 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-04-2014-0041 doi: 10.1108/IJMF-04-2014-0041
    [56] Titman S, Wessels R (1988) The determinants of capital structure choice. J Financ 43: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb02585.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb02585.x
    [57] Wang R, Zhou L (2025) Capital structure deviation and corporate technological innovation: Empirical evidence from the perspective of ESG responsibility fulfillment. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5163595 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5163595
    [58] Xing Y (2020) The impact of behavioral bias on individual investors and corporation capital structure. Acad J Bus Manag 2: 112–121. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2020.020401. doi: 10.25236/AJBM.2020.020401
    [59] Xia C, Chan KC, Cao C, et al. (2021) Generalized trust, personalized trust, and dynamics of capital structure: Evidence from China. China Econ Rev 68: 101640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101640 doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101640
    [60] Yang B, Gan L, Wen C (2021). Moral hazard, debt overhang and capital structure. North Am J Econ Financ 58, 101538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2021.101538 doi: 10.1016/j.najef.2021.101538
    [61] Zou Y, Bai Q (2022) The impact of dividend policies and financing strategies on the speed of firms’ capital structure adjustment. Discr Dyna in Nat and Soc 2022: Article ID 3209502, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3209502
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Babita Pandey, Devendra Kumar Pandey, Brijendra Pratap Mishra, Wasiur Rhmann, A comprehensive survey of deep learning in the field of medical imaging and medical natural language processing: Challenges and research directions, 2021, 13191578, 10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.01.007
    2. Lizong Deng, Luming Chen, Tao Yang, Mi Liu, Shicheng Li, Taijiao Jiang, Constructing High-Fidelity Phenotype Knowledge Graphs for Infectious Diseases With a Fine-Grained Semantic Information Model: Development and Usability Study, 2021, 23, 1438-8871, e26892, 10.2196/26892
    3. Marta B. Fernandes, Navid Valizadeh, Haitham S. Alabsi, Syed A. Quadri, Ryan A. Tesh, Abigail A. Bucklin, Haoqi Sun, Aayushee Jain, Laura N. Brenner, Elissa Ye, Wendong Ge, Sarah I. Collens, Stacie Lin, Sudeshna Das, Gregory K. Robbins, Sahar F. Zafar, Shibani S. Mukerji, M. Brandon Westover, Classification of neurologic outcomes from medical notes using natural language processing, 2023, 214, 09574174, 119171, 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119171
    4. Jin-ah Sim, Xiaolei Huang, Madeline R. Horan, Christopher M. Stewart, Leslie L. Robison, Melissa M. Hudson, Justin N. Baker, I-Chan Huang, Natural language processing with machine learning methods to analyze unstructured patient-reported outcomes derived from electronic health records: A systematic review, 2023, 146, 09333657, 102701, 10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102701
    5. Yu Zhang, Rui Xie, Iman Beheshti, Xia Liu, Guowei Zheng, Yin Wang, Zhenwen Zhang, Weihao Zheng, Zhijun Yao, Bin Hu, Improving brain age prediction with anatomical feature attention-enhanced 3D-CNN, 2024, 169, 00104825, 107873, 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107873
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2025 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(230) PDF downloads(21) Cited by(0)

Figures and Tables

Figures(12)  /  Tables(8)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog