Research article Special Issues

Determinants of Egypt's unemployment rate with machine learning algorithms

  • Received: 18 January 2024 Revised: 31 May 2024 Accepted: 20 June 2024 Published: 05 July 2024
  • JEL Codes: E24, C80, C81, C87

  • This research endeavored to harness the capabilities of machine learning algorithms, specifically gradient boosting (GB) and random forest (RF), to ascertain the optimal algorithm for precisely analyzing the determinants influencing Egypt's unemployment rate. Among the algorithms employed, the study identified the gradient boosting (GB) algorithm as the most accurate in this context. The investigation discerned vital variables that substantially influence Egypt's unemployment rate. The analysis revealed that the industry sector value notably impacts the unemployment rate, accounting for 37.3%, and the GDP growth contributes 23.7%. Additionally, variables such as the value of imports (11.7%) and labor force participation (9.5%) emerged as significant determinants. Moreover, the research demonstrated that the unemployment rate exhibits negative correlations with factors including the value added in the agriculture sector, foreign direct investment (FDI), GDP growth, and gross fixed capital formation. Conversely, the unemployment rate positively correlates with variables such as inflation, human development index, imports, labor force participation, industry sector value added, and services sector value.

    Citation: Mohamed F. Abd El-Aal. Determinants of Egypt's unemployment rate with machine learning algorithms[J]. Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2024, 4(3): 333-349. doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2024014

    Related Papers:

  • This research endeavored to harness the capabilities of machine learning algorithms, specifically gradient boosting (GB) and random forest (RF), to ascertain the optimal algorithm for precisely analyzing the determinants influencing Egypt's unemployment rate. Among the algorithms employed, the study identified the gradient boosting (GB) algorithm as the most accurate in this context. The investigation discerned vital variables that substantially influence Egypt's unemployment rate. The analysis revealed that the industry sector value notably impacts the unemployment rate, accounting for 37.3%, and the GDP growth contributes 23.7%. Additionally, variables such as the value of imports (11.7%) and labor force participation (9.5%) emerged as significant determinants. Moreover, the research demonstrated that the unemployment rate exhibits negative correlations with factors including the value added in the agriculture sector, foreign direct investment (FDI), GDP growth, and gross fixed capital formation. Conversely, the unemployment rate positively correlates with variables such as inflation, human development index, imports, labor force participation, industry sector value added, and services sector value.



    加载中


    [1] Imran M, Sial MH (2013) Employment, Trade Openness, and Capital Formation : Time Series Evidence from Pakistan. J Glob Sci Issues 1: 37–42.
    [2] Sattar A, Bhalli MN (2013) Empirical Evidence from Pakistan. 51: 191–207.
    [3] Abdul-khaliq S, Soufan T, Shihab RA (2014) The Relationship between Unemployment and Economic Growth Rate in Arab Country. J Econ Sust Dev 4: 62–67.
    [4] Ogonna IC, Idenyi OS, Ifeyinwa AC, et al. (2016) The Implications of Rising Public Debt on Unemployment in Nigeria : An Auto Regressive Distributed Lag Approach. Asian Res J Arts Soc Sci 1: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.9734/ARJASS/2016/26394 doi: 10.9734/ARJASS/2016/26394
    [5] Bakare AS, Akoko PMBA, State O (2011) The Determinants of Urban Unemployment Crisis in Nigeria : An Econometric Analysis. J Emerg Trends Econ Manage Sci 2: 184–192. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC134174
    [6] Megbowon ET, Ngarava S, Mushunje A (2016) Foreign direct investment inflow, capital formation and employment in South Africa: A time series analysis. Int J Econ FinancStud 8: 175–189.
    [7] Qadar M, Muhammad N (2013) Unemployment Is An Outcome of Corruption. Int J Adv Res Econ Commer 2: 14.
    [8] Azhar AAM, Ibrahim NA (2021) Factors Affecting Unemployment Rate In Malaysia. Available from: https://oarep.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/18552.
    [9] Siddiqa A (2021) Determinants of unemployment in selected developing countries: A panel data analysis. J Econ Impact 3: 19–26.
    [10] Digvijay DB (2021) Factors affecting high unemployment in India. Available from: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/110621.
    [11] Gogas P, Papadimitriou T, Sofianos E (2022) Forecasting unemployment in the euro area with machine learning. J Forecast 41: 551–566. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2824 doi: 10.1002/for.2824
    [12] Dalmar MS, Ali AYS, Ali AA (2017) Factors affecting unemployment in Somalia. J Econ Sustain Dev 8: 200–210.
    [13] Abugamea G (2018) Determinants of unemployment: Empirical evidence from Palestine. Available from: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/89424.
    [14] Salama A, Judit O (2019) Key factors ampact unemployment in the Arab world—central European. J Labour Law Pers Manage 2: 1. https://doi.org/10.33382/cejllpm.2019.03.05 doi: 10.33382/cejllpm.2019.03.05
    [15] McCann P (2001) Urban and Regional Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [16] Turgut E (2021) Unemployment and factors affecting unemployment in developing countries. Discuss Between 7.
    [17] Bowles S, Gintis H (1975) The Problem with Human Capital Theory Marxian Critique. Am Econ Rev 65: 74–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/1818836 doi: 10.2307/1818836
    [18] Friedman JH (2001) Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann stat 1189–1232. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2699986.
    [19] Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH, et al. (2009) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. 2: 1–758. New York: Springer.
    [20] Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach learn 45: 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324 doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
    [21] Dietterich TG (2000) Ensemble methods in machine learning. In International workshop on multiple classifier systems, 1–15. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    [22] Tashman LJ (2000) Out-of-sample tests of forecasting accuracy: an analysis and review. Int J Forecasting 16: 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(00)00065-0 doi: 10.1016/S0169-2070(00)00065-0
    [23] El-Aal A, Mohamed F (2024) The relationship between CO2 emissions and macroeconomics indicators in low and high-income countries: using artificial intelligence. Environ Dev Sustaina 2024: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04880-3 doi: 10.1007/s10668-024-04880-3
    [24] Probst P, Wright MN, Boulesteix AL (2019) Hyperparameters and tuning strategies for random forest. Wires Data Min knowl 9: e1301. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1301 doi: 10.1002/widm.1301
    [25] Abd El-Aal MF (2023) Analysis factors affecting Egyptian inflation based on machine learning algorithms. Data Sci Financ Econ 3: 285–304. https://doi.org/10.3934/DSFE.2023017 doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2023017
    [26] Molinaro AM, Simon R, Pfeiffer RM (2005) Prediction error estimation: a comparison of resampling methods. Bioinformatics 21: 3301–3307.
    [27] World Bank, world development indicators. Available from: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1012) PDF downloads(67) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(4)  /  Tables(4)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog