Research article

Acinetobacter baumannii in sheep, goat, and camel raw meat: virulence and antibiotic resistance pattern

  • Received: 13 May 2019 Accepted: 27 August 2019 Published: 23 September 2019
  • Acinetobacter genus belongs to a group of Gram-negative coccobacillus. These bacteria are isolated from human and animal origins. Antimicrobial agents play a vital role in treating infectious diseases in both humans and animals, and Acinetobacter in this regard is defined as an organism of low virulence. The current study aimed to evaluate antibiotic resistance properties and virulence factor genes in Acinetobacter baumannii strains isolated from raw animal meat samples. Fresh meat samples from 124 sheep, 162 goat, and 95 camels were randomly collected from Isfahan and Shahrekord cities in Iran. Most A. baumannii strains isolated from sheep meat samples represented fimH (82.35%), aac(3)-IV (78.43%), sul1 (78.43%) and Integron Class I (96.07%) genes. Moreover, more than 50% of A. baumannii strains isolated from sheep samples were resistant to streptomycin (54.90%), gentamycin (74.50%), co-trimoxazole (70.58%), tetracycline (82.35%), and trimethoprim (62.74%). Current findings revealed significant association between the presence of fimH, cnfI, afa/draBC, dfrA1, sulI, aac(3)-IV genes in sheep samples. Furthermore, significant association was observed between fimH, cnfI, sfa/focDE and dfrA1genes in goat meat samples. In sheep meat samples, significant differences were identified in resistance to gentamicin, tetracycline, and co-trimoxazole in comparison with other antibiotics. Finally, there were statistically significant differences between the incidences of resistance to gentamicin, tetracycline, and co-trimoxazole in comparison with other antibiotics in all strains. In conclusion, the presence of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance in A. baumannii strains isolated from animal meat samples showed that animals should be considered as a potential reservoir of multidrug-resistant A. baumannii.

    Citation: Neda Askari, Hassan Momtaz, Elahe Tajbakhsh. Acinetobacter baumannii in sheep, goat, and camel raw meat: virulence and antibiotic resistance pattern[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(3): 272-284. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.3.272

    Related Papers:

    [1] Bindu Subhadra, Man Hwan Oh, Chul Hee Choi . Quorum sensing in Acinetobacter: with special emphasis on antibiotic resistance, biofilm formation and quorum quenching. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(1): 27-41. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.1.27
    [2] Liang Wang, Zuobin Zhu, Huimin Qian, Ying Li, Ying Chen, Ping Ma, Bing Gu . Comparative genome analysis of 15 clinical Shigella flexneri strains regarding virulence and antibiotic resistance. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(3): 205-222. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.3.205
    [3] Maureen U. Okwu, Mitsan Olley, Augustine O. Akpoka, Osazee E. Izevbuwa . Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and anti-MRSA activities of extracts of some medicinal plants: A brief review. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(2): 117-137. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.2.117
    [4] Taish Ramkisson, Diane Rip . Carbapenem resistance in Enterobacterales from agricultural, environmental and clinical origins: South Africa in a global context. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(4): 668-691. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023034
    [5] Ruba Mirghani, Tania Saba, Hebba Khaliq, Jennifer Mitchell, Lan Do, Liz Chambi, Kelly Diaz, Taylor Kennedy, Katia Alkassab, Thuhue Huynh, Mohamed Elmi, Jennifer Martinez, Suad Sawan, Girdhari Rijal . Biofilms: Formation, drug resistance and alternatives to conventional approaches. AIMS Microbiology, 2022, 8(3): 239-277. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2022019
    [6] Ahmed E. Kholif, Anuoluwapo Anele, Uchenna Y. Anele . Microbial feed additives in ruminant feeding. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(3): 542-571. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024026
    [7] Rochelle Keet, Diane Rip . Listeria monocytogenes isolates from Western Cape, South Africa exhibit resistance to multiple antibiotics and contradicts certain global resistance patterns. AIMS Microbiology, 2021, 7(1): 40-58. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021004
    [8] Yue Tang, Shaun Cawthraw, Mary C. Bagnall, Adriana J. Gielbert, Martin J. Woodward, Liljana Petrovska . Identification of temperature regulated factors of Campylobacter jejuni and their potential roles in virulence. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(4): 885-898. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.4.885
    [9] Mohammad Abu-Sini, Mohammad A. Al-Kafaween, Rania M. Al-Groom, Abu Bakar Mohd Hilmi . Comparative in vitro activity of various antibiotic against planktonic and biofilm and the gene expression profile in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(2): 313-331. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023017
    [10] Rana Abdel Fattah Abdel Fattah, Fatma El zaharaa Youssef Fathy, Tahany Abdel Hamed Mohamed, Marwa Shabban Elsayed . Effect of chitosan nanoparticles on quorum sensing-controlled virulence factors and expression of LasI and RhlI genes among Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. AIMS Microbiology, 2021, 7(4): 415-430. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021025
  • Acinetobacter genus belongs to a group of Gram-negative coccobacillus. These bacteria are isolated from human and animal origins. Antimicrobial agents play a vital role in treating infectious diseases in both humans and animals, and Acinetobacter in this regard is defined as an organism of low virulence. The current study aimed to evaluate antibiotic resistance properties and virulence factor genes in Acinetobacter baumannii strains isolated from raw animal meat samples. Fresh meat samples from 124 sheep, 162 goat, and 95 camels were randomly collected from Isfahan and Shahrekord cities in Iran. Most A. baumannii strains isolated from sheep meat samples represented fimH (82.35%), aac(3)-IV (78.43%), sul1 (78.43%) and Integron Class I (96.07%) genes. Moreover, more than 50% of A. baumannii strains isolated from sheep samples were resistant to streptomycin (54.90%), gentamycin (74.50%), co-trimoxazole (70.58%), tetracycline (82.35%), and trimethoprim (62.74%). Current findings revealed significant association between the presence of fimH, cnfI, afa/draBC, dfrA1, sulI, aac(3)-IV genes in sheep samples. Furthermore, significant association was observed between fimH, cnfI, sfa/focDE and dfrA1genes in goat meat samples. In sheep meat samples, significant differences were identified in resistance to gentamicin, tetracycline, and co-trimoxazole in comparison with other antibiotics. Finally, there were statistically significant differences between the incidences of resistance to gentamicin, tetracycline, and co-trimoxazole in comparison with other antibiotics in all strains. In conclusion, the presence of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance in A. baumannii strains isolated from animal meat samples showed that animals should be considered as a potential reservoir of multidrug-resistant A. baumannii.


    Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) has been considered a major nosocomial pathogen, especially in intensive care units (ICUs), which can produce numerous infections such as septicemia, nosocomial meningitis, urinary tract infection, bacteremia, wound infection, infection of skin and soft tissue, and high-mortal pneumonia [1]. Interestingly, it can be identified in a range of food items, such as fruits, raw vegetables, milk, and dairy products [2]. There are few science reports of infections due to A. baumannii in animals and only a scarce number of studies have reported such cases [3].

    Of this genus, A. baumannii strains revealed more resistant patterns than other species and often express a multi-drug resistant (MDR) phenotype. Consequently, during the past 30 years, strains of A. baumannii have obtained resistance against newly developed antimicrobial agents. This fact has become prevalent in some hospitals in the world and has been identified as a complicated nosocomial pathogen [4]. Antimicrobial agents are essential for treating infectious diseases in both humans and animals [5].

    Based on the degree of antimicrobial resistance for Acinetobacter spp., there are three different terms: multidrug resistant (MDR), extensive drug resistant (XDR), and pan-drug resistant (PDR). MDR Acinetobacter spp. refers to resistance pattern to a minimum of three classes of antimicrobial drugs such as penicillin and cephalosporin, fluoroquinolone, and aminoglycoside [6]. Another multidrug resistance definition belongs to the resistance pattern to more than two of the following five antibiotic drug classes: antipseudomonal cephalosporin (ceftazidime or cefepime), antipseudomonal carbapenem (imipenem or meropenem), ampicillin-sulbactam, fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin), and aminoglycoside (gentamicin, tobramycin, or amikacin) [7].

    Acinetobacter is defined as an organism of low virulence, which among the possible virulence factors, one can mention cell surface hydrophobicity, outer membrane proteins (OMPs), toxic slime polysaccharides, and verotoxins. Many factors like extracellular enzymes, cytotoxins and secreted vascular permeability are produced by A. baumannii that are involved in the pathogenesis and cause harm to host tissues particularly in respiratory tract infections [8].

    The pathogenesis in bacteria can be due to the prevalence of virulence factors, which are involved in some performances such as colonizing on the epithelium, evading and inhibiting the host's immune response through biofilm formation, and obtaining nutrition from the host [9]. However, there is little information about the virulence factors in A. baumannii and identifying these factors can develop novel therapeutic alternatives for the control of clinically relevant pathogen [10].

    Only few research studies have stimulated data regarding A. baumannii in veterinary medicine. The issue of emerging pathogen in veterinary medicine with a high potential for multidrug resistance and prevalence of A. baumannii is becoming alarmingly evident [10]. Actually, Acinetobacter spp. have been isolated from different animal sources such as birds, fish, and rainbow trout. Moreover, some chicken septicemia, mastitis and metrititis in cows, abortions in cattle, pigs and horses, keratoconjunctivitis in cattle, omphalitis in calves, ear infections in cats, and respiratory infections and balanoposthitis in horses have been identified [10].

    Based on research by Vaneechoutte et al. [11], seven A. baumannii isolates were identified from jugular catheter tips placed in horses, but the organism was only indicated as responsible for local infection or colonization. Francey et al. [12] identified the clinical characteristics of several pets, which suffer from different A. baumannii infections such as urinary, respiratory, wound and bloodstream infections, reporting an overall attributable mortality of 47%.

    Studies regarding the association of A. baumannii strains with foodborne illnesses are somewhat limited. Therefore, the present investigation was done to study the prevalence rate and phenotypic characterization of antibiotic resistance of the A. baumannii strains isolated from sheep, goat, and camel raw meat samples.

    A total of 124 sheep, 162 goat, and 95 camels fresh raw meat samples were randomly selected from 106 meat shops in Isfahan and Shahrekord. All samples were taken from the femur muscle of animal species. Thirty grams of meat were collected from each animal. The cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2015 to September 2016. It is notable that all the samples were approved (healthy) by the specialized veterinarians of Shahrekord Azad University.

    Specimens were collected by a laboratory technician, properly labeled, and transferred immediately to the microbiology laboratory. Each of these samples were streaked on blood agar (Merck, Germany) and MacConkey agar (Merck, Germany), and then incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 hours. Further, non-hemolytic, opaque and creamy colonies on blood agar and non-lactose fermenting colonies on MacConkey agar were sub-cultured on MacConkey agar and incubated for 24 hours at 37 °C to achieve pure colonies. The isolated organisms were identified based on colonial and microscopic characteristics and different biochemical tests according to standard laboratory methods. Stock cultures were conserved in both agar slant and 20% sterile buffered glycerin and were maintained at -70 °C [13].

    A DNA Extraction Kit (Cinnagen, Iran) was used to extract genomic DNA from the bacterial isolates according to the manufacturer's instructions. To confirm and recognition of the isolates, conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed by amplification of 16S–23S ribosomal DNA and the primer pairs shown in Table 1.

    PCRs were carried out in 50 µL volume, the ingredients of which consisted of 5 µL of 10X PCR buffer, 2 mM of MgCl2, 150 µM of dNTPs mix, one unit of Taq DNA polemerase (Fermentas-Lithuania), 1 µM of reverse and forward primers, and 3 µL of template DNA (being the DNA of the isolates). PCR program was set to a cycle of 6 min at 94 °C, 30 repetitive cycles, of 95 °C for 60 s, 58 °C for 60 s, and 72 °C for 40 s, as well as a last cycle of 72 °C for 5 min, respectively (Table 3) [15]. (Tavakol 2018). All PCR reactions were performed in a thermocycler (Eppendrof Mastercycler 5330; Eppendorf-Nethel-Hinz GmbH, Hamburg, Germany), and products of PCR amplification were visualized by electrophoresis in 1.5% agaros gel. Ultimately, fragment amplifications with a size of 208 bp illustrated the presence of A. baumannii in isolated samples.

    Susceptibility of antimicrobial agents was assessed by the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method using Mueller–Hinton agar (HiMedia Laboratories, Mumbai, India, MV1084), according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. After incubating the inoculated plate aerobically at 37 °C for 18–24 h, the A.baumannii isolates' susceptibility to each antimicrobial agents were measured and the results were interpreted in accordance with interpretive criteria provided by CLSI (2017) [16]. The antibimicrobial agents in this investigation were trimethoprim (5 µg/disk); tetracycline (30 µg/disk); ceftazidime (30 µg/disk); cephalothin (30 µg/disk); co-trimoxazole (23.75/1.25 µg/disk); tobramycin (10 µg/disk); amikacin (30 u/disk); gentamicin (10 µg/disk); streptomycin (10 µg/disk); erythromycin (15 µg/disk); rafampicin (5 µg/disk); azithromycin (15 µg/disk); nitrofurantoin (300 µg/disk); chloramphenicol (30 µg/disk); mupirocin (30 µg/disk); imipenem (10 µg/disk); levofloxacin (5 µg/disk), and ciprofloxacin (5 µg/disk). For quality control purposes, the A. baumannii ATCC 19606 was used to determine antimicrobial susceptibility.

    Table 1.  Primers used for detection of virulence genes in A. baumannii [14].
    Gene Primer name Primer Sequence (5′–3′) Size of product (bp)
    afa/draBC afa1 GCTGGGCAGCAAACTGATAACTCTC 750
    afa2 CATCAAGCTGTTTGTTCGTCCGCCG
    cnf1 cnf1 AAGATGGAGTTTCCTATGCAGGAG 498
    cnf2 CATTCAGAGTCCTGCCCTCATTATT
    cnf2 cnf2a AATCTAATTAAAGAGAAC 543
    cnf2b CATGCTTTGTATATCTA
    csgA M464 ACTCTGACTTGACTATTACC 200
    M465 AGATGCAGTCTGGTCAAC
    cvaC ColV-CF CACACACAAACGGGAGCTGTT 680
    ColV-CR CTTCCCGCAGCATAGTTCCAT
    fimH FimH F TGCAGAACGGATAAGCCGTGG 508
    FimH R GCAGTCACCTGCCCTCCGGTA
    fyuA FyuA f TGATTAACCCCGCGACGGGAA 880
    FyuA R CGCAGTAGGCACGATGTTGTA
    ibeA ibe10 F AGGCAGGTGTGCGCCGCGTAC 170
    fibe10 R TGGTGCTCCGGCAAACCATGC
    iutA AerJ F GGCTGGACATCATGGGAACTGG 300
    AerJ R CGTCGGGAACGGGTAGAATCG
    kpsMT II kpsII F GCGCATTTGCTGATACTGTTG 272
    kpsII R CATCCAGACGATAAGCATGAGCA
    PAI RPAi F GGACATCCTGTTACAGCGCGCA 930
    RPAi R TCGCCACCAATCACAGCCGAAC
    papC pap1 GACGGCTGTACTGCAGGGTGTGGCG 328
    pap2 ATATCCTTTCTGCAGGGATGCAATA
    PapG II, III pGf CTGTAATTACGGAAGTGATTTCTG 1070
    pGr ACTATCCGGCTCCGGATAAACCAT
    sfa/focDE sfa1 CTCCGGAGAACTGGGTGCATCTTAC 410
    sfa2 CGGAGGAGTAATTACAAACCTGGCA
    traT TraT F GGTGTGGTGCGATGAGCACAG 290
    TraT R CACGGTTCAGCCATCCCTGAG
    A. baumannii detection 16S-23S (F) CATTATCACGGTAATTAGTG 208
    ribosomal DNA (R) AGAGCACTGTGCACTTAAG

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The virulence genes, antibiotic resistance coding genes, and integrons are presented in tables 1 and 2. PCR programs (temperature and volume) for detection of 16S–23S ribosomal DNA and all mentioned genes in A. baumannii are summarized in Table 3 [15]. The PCR amplified products (10µL) were subjected to electrophoresis in a 1.5% agaros gel (Fermentas, Germany) in 1X TBE buffer (Fermentas, Germany) at 80V for 30 minutes, stained with DNA Safe Stain (Cinnagen, Iran), which were subsequently examined under ultra violet illumination (Uvitec, England). In current study, in order to detect the molecular mass of PCR products the 100-bp ladder (Fermentas, Germany) was used as a standard factor, and to finalize the PCR results (confirm or reject), the PCR products of the primary positive samples were purified by a PCR product purification kit (Roche Applied Science, Germany) and sent to the Macrogen Co. (South Korea) for sequencing.

    Table 2.  Primers used for detection of antibiotic resistance genes in A. baumannii [17].
    Gene Primer Sequence (5′-3′) Size of product (bp)
    aadA1 (F) TATCCAGCTAAGCGCGAACT 447
    (R) ATTTGCCGACTACCTTGGTC

    aac(3)-IV (F) CTTCAGGATGGCAAGTTGGT 286
    (R) TCATCTCGTTCTCCGCTCAT

    sul1 (F) TTCGGCATTCTGAATCTCAC 822
    (R) ATGATCTAACCCTCGGTCTC

    blaSHV (F) TCGCCTGTGTATTATCTCCC 768
    (R) CGCAGATAAATCACCACAATG

    CITM (F) TGGCCAGAACTGACAGGCAAA 462
    (R) TTTCTCCTGAACGTGGCTGGC

    cat1 (F) AGTTGCTCAATGTACCTATAACC 547
    (R) TTGTAATTCATTAAGCATTCTGCC

    cmlA (F) CCGCCACGGTGTTGTTGTTATC 698
    (R) CACCTTGCCTGCCCATCATTAG

    tet(A) (F) GGTTCACTCGAACGACGTCA 577
    (R) CTGTCCGACAAGTTGCATGA

    tet(B) (F) CCTCAGCTTCTCAACGCGTG 634
    (R) GCACCTTGCTGATGACTCTT

    dfrA1 (F) GGAGTGCCAAAGGTGAACAGC 367
    (R) GAGGCGAAGTCTTGGGTAAAAAC

    Qnr (F) GGGTATGGATATTATTGATAAAG 670
    (R) CTAATCCGGCAGCACTATTTA

    Imp (F) GAATAGAATGGTTAACTCTC 188
    (R) CCAAACCACTAGGTTATC

    Vim (F) GTTTGGTCGCATATCGCAAC 382
    (R) AATGCGCAGCACCAGGATAG

    Sim (F) GTACAAGGGATTCGGCATCG 569
    (R) GTACAAGGGATTCGGCATCG

    Oxa-51-like (F) TAATGCTTTGATCGGCCTTG 353
    (R) TGGATTGCACTTCATCTTGG

    Oxa-23-like (F) GATCGGATTGGAGAACCAGA 501
    (R) ATTTCTGACCGCATTTCCAT

    Oxa-24-like (F) GGTTAGTTGGCCCCCTTAAA 246
    (R) AGTTGAGCGAAAAGGGGATT

    Oxa-58-like (F) AAGTATTGGGGCTTGTGCTG 599
    (R) CCCCTCTGCGCTCTACATAC

    IntI F: CAG TGG ACA TAA GCC TGT TC 160
    R: CCC GAC GCA TAG ACT GTA

    IntII F: TTG CGA GTA TCC ATA ACC TG 288
    R: TTA CCT GCA CTG GAT TAA GC

    IntIII F: GCC TCC GGC AGC GAC TTT CAG 1041
    R: ACG GAT CTG CCA AAC CTG ACT

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 3.  PCR conditions for virulence genes, antibiotic resistance genes and integrons detection in A. baumannii.
    draBC, cnf1, csgA, cvaC, iutA, fyuA 1 cycle:
    95 °C ------------ 4 min.
    30 cycle:
    95 °C ------------ 50 s
    58 °C ------------ 60 s
    72 °C ------------ 45 s
    1 cycle:
    72 °C ------------ 8 min
    5 µL PCR buffer 10X
    1.5 mM Mgcl2
    200 µM dNTP (Fermentas)
    0.5 µM of each primers F & R
    1.25 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)
    2.5 µL DNA template
    cnf2, kpsMT II, PAI, papC 1 cycle:
    94 °C ------------ 6 min.
    34 cycle:
    95 °C ------------ 50 s
    58 °C ------------ 70 s
    72 °C ------------ 55 s
    1 cycle:
    72 °C ------------ 10 min
    5 µL PCR buffer 10X
    2 mM Mgcl2
    150 µM dNTP (Fermentas)
    0.75 µM of each primers F & R
    1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)
    3 µL DNA template
    fimH, ibeA, PapG II-III, sfa/focDE, traT 1 cycle:
    95 °C ------------ 4 min.
    34 cycle:
    94 °C ------------ 60 s
    56 °C ------------ 45 s
    72 °C ------------ 60 s
    1 cycle:
    72 °C ------------ 10 min
    5 µL PCR buffer 10X
    2 mM Mgcl2
    200 µM dNTP (Fermentas)
    0.5 µM of each primers F & R
    1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)
    5 µL DNA template
    16S-23S ribosomal DNA 1 cycle:
    94 °C ------------ 6 min.
    30 cycle:
    95 °C ------------ 60 s
    58 °C ------------ 60 s
    72 °C ------------ 40 s
    1 cycle:
    72 °C ------------ 5 min
    5 µL PCR buffer 10X
    2mM Mgcl2
    150 µM dNTP (Fermentas)
    1 µM of each primers F & R
    1 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)
    3 µL DNA template
    aadA1, aac(3)-IV, sul1, blaSHV, CITM, cat1, cmlA, tet(a), tet(B), dfrA1, and qnr. 1 cycle:
    94 °C ------------ 6 min.
    33 cycle:
    95 °C ------------ 70 s
    55 °C ------------ 65 s
    72 °C ------------ 90 s
    1 cycle:
    72 °C ------------ 8 min
    5 µL PCR buffer 10X
    2 mM Mgcl2
    150 µM dNTP (Fermentas)
    0. 5 µM of each primers F & R
    1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)
    2 µL DNA template
    imp, vim, and sim 1 cycle:
    95 °C ------------ 4 min.
    30cycle:
    95 °C ------------ 45 s
    58 °C ------------ 60s
    72 °C ------------ 40 s
    1 cycle:
    72 °C ------------ 5min
    5 µL PCR buffer 10X
    1.5 mM Mgcl2
    100 µM dNTP (Fermentas)
    1 µM of each primers F & R
    1 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)
    2.5 µL DNA template
    Oxa-23-like, Oxa-24-like, Oxa-51-like, Oxa-58-like) 1 cycle:
    94 °C ------------ 5 min.
    32 cycle:
    95 °C ------------ 50 s
    60 °C ------------ 60 s
    72 °C ------------ 70 s
    1 cycle:
    72 °C ------------ 10 min
    5 µL PCR buffer 10X
    2.5 mM Mgcl2
    200 µM dNTP (Fermentas)
    0.5 µM of each primers F & R
    1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)
    2 µL DNA template
    Int I/II/III 1 cycle:
    94 °C ------------ 6 min.
    35 cycle:
    94 °C ------------ 60 s
    56 °C ------------ 60 s
    72 °C ------------ 45 s
    1 cycle:
    72 °C ------------ 6 min
    5 µL PCR buffer 10X
    1.5 mM Mgcl2
    200 µM dNTP (Fermentas)
    0.5 µM of each primers F & R
    1 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas)
    2.5 µL DNA template

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The obtained data were analyzed using IBM SPSS software version 18 and P values were calculated using Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests to identify statistically significant association between distribution of virulence genes, and antibiotic resistance properties of the A. baumannii strains isolated from sheep, goat, and camel meat samples. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

    A total of 381 samples, 124 samples of sheep meat, 162 samples of goat meat and 95 samples from camel meat were obtained; of these, A. baumannii were isolated from 51 (41.12%) sheep meat samples, 19 (11.72%) from goat meat samples and 5 (2.26%) from camel meat samples (Table 4). Moreover, there is significant difference between sheep meat with other samples infected with A. baumannii (P = 0.025)

    Table 4.  Incidence of A. baumannii strains in sheep, goat and camel raw meat samples.
    Samples No. Samples No. A. baumannii Isolation rate
    Sheep meat 124 51 41.12%
    Goat meat 162 19 11.72%
    Camel meat 95 5 2.26%
    Total 381 75 19.68%

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Interestingly, the highest virulence factor genes, which were detected in all strains isolated from samples were fimH (Table 5). Based on statistical analysis, there was significant association between the presence of fimH, cnfI, afa/draBC genes in this virulence factor gene with other genes in sheep samples (P = 0.031). In addition, there was significant association between fimH, cnfI, sfa/focDE genes with other genes in goat meat samples (P = 0.042), and strong association was observed between the presence of fimH, cnfI, sfa/focDE, afa/draBC virulence factor genes with others genes in camel isolated samples (P = 0.029). According to this table, it can be concluded that almost all virulence factor genes were represented in sheep samples except fyuA. For goat and camel samples, the presence of PAI and papGIII genes was not detected.

    Table 6 demonstrates the frequency of antibiotic resistance genes in sheep, goat, and camel meat samples, which revealed that none of the three meat sample groups represented the qnr gene. The highest and lowest antibiotic resistance genes were aac(3)-IV, sul1 and sim in sheep meat sample with resistance values of 80.39%, 80.39% and 1.96%, respectively. Moreover, in the studied samples, all genes represented except qnr. Statistical analysis revealed significant association between the presence of dfrA1, sulI, aac(3)-IV genes in sheep isolated samples (P = 0.019); in goat samples, strong association between dfrA1 gene (P = 0.021) were observed, and in all sample groups, dfrA1, sulI, aac(3)-IV genes showed significant difference in comparison to other antibiotic resistance genes (P = 0.025).

    Integron genes are presented in Table 7 and it can be concluded that the most frequent gene in all sample groups was the Integron Class I, but Integron Class III was not found in goat and camel positive samples. Overall, 85.33% of isolated A. baumannii strains represented Class I Integron genes. Statistics confirmed significant association between the presence of Integron Class I in sheep, goat and camel isolated samples (P = 0.019, 0.032 and 0.041, respectively); moreover, the presence of Integron Class I revealed significant difference in comparison to other Integron genes (P = 0.029).

    Antimicrobial susceptibility tests conducted using the Kirby-Bauer test revealed that more than 50% of A. baumannii stains isolated from sheep samples were resistant to streptomycin, gentamycin, co-trimoxazole, tetracycline, and trimethoprim (Table 8). The highest resistance was observed in A. baumannii stains isolated from goat and camel meat samples belong to trimetoprim.

    Statistical analysis showed significant difference between resistance to gentamicin, tetracycline, and co-trimoxazole in comparison with other antibiotics in isolated strains of sheep meat samples (P = 0.032). Overall, there were statistically significant differences amongst the incidences of resistance to gentamicin, tetracycline, and co-trimoxazole in comparison with other antibiotics in all strains (P = 0.026).

    Table 5.  Frequency of virulence factor genes in A. baumannii strains isolated from sheep, goat and camel meat samples.
    Sample/frequency fimH fyuA iutA cvaC csgA Cnf2 Cnf1 afa/draBC
    Sheep/51 42 - 17 12 11 17 24 27
    Goat/19 14 7 7 3 7 3 11 6
    Camel/5 3 - - 1 - - 1 1
    Sample/frequency traT Sfa/focDE PapG III PapG II papC ibeA PAI KpsMT II
    Sheep/51 2 27 3 11 8 10 2 13
    Goat/19 3 4 - 3 6 3 - 4
    Camel/5 1 1 - - 1 1 - -

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 6.  Frequency of antibiotic resistance genes in A. baumannii strains isolated from sheep, goat and camel meat samples.
    Sample/frequency aadA1 aac(3)-IV sul1 blaSHV blaCITM tetA tetB dfrA1 qnr
    Sheep/51 28 40 40 24 21 18 26 36 -
    Goat/19 9 9 11 10 10 7 5 15 -
    Camel/5 1 2 2 2 1 2 - 3 -
    Sample/frequency vim sim Imp cat1 cmlA Oxa-51-like Oxa-23-like Oxa-24-like Oxa-58-like
    Sheep/51 3 1 2 2 5 5 3 6 4
    Goat/19 2 - 1 3 - 2 1 - 3
    Camel/5 - - - - 2 1 - 1 2

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 7.  Frequency of Integron genes in A. baumannii strains isolated from sheep, goat and camel meat samples.
    Class I Class II Class III Sample/frequency
    49 16 1 Sheep/51
    11 6 - Goat/19
    4 1 - Camel/5

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 8.  Antibiotic resistance pattern in A. baumannii strains isolated from sheep, goat and camel meat samples.
    Sample/frequency streptomycin gentamicin amikacin tobramycin co-trimoxazole cephalotin ceftazidime tetracycline trimetoprim
    Sheep/51 28 38 21 20 36 19 16 42 32
    Goat/19 7 8 10 9 11 10 12 11 14
    Camel/5 - 2 - 1 2 - - 2 3
    Sample/frequency ciprofloxacin lovofloxacin imipenem meropenem cloramphenicol nitrofurantoin azithromycin rifampin erythromycin
    Sheep/51 12 7 5 7 6 7 4 6 22
    Goat/19 7 3 - 2 3 4 2 4 8
    Camel/5 1 - - - 2 1 - - 1

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In literatures, Acinetobacter are denoted as a heterogeneous group of organisms that are found almost everywhere, frequently distributed in the environment. The isolated strains of this species have frequently originated from animals including birds, fish, and rainbow trout [6]. Researchers have rarely assessed the infections due to A. baumannii in animals. Among previous findings, we could mention the study on A. baumannii isolates from different animals including ducks, pigeons, chickens, donkeys, rabbits, pets (cats and dogs), mules, livestock (cattle, sheep, goats, pigs), horses, lice and arthropods, which outbreaks in human medicine have been reported in several years [18],[19].

    In the present study, antibiotic resistance patterns and virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance genes and Integron genes were assessed, which most sheep meat samples with A. baumannii represented fimH, aac(3)-IV, sul1 and Integron Class I genes. Nonetheless, among all isolated stains, all genes except qnr were represented. Eventually, more than 50% of A. baumannii stains isolated from sheep meat samples were resistant to streptomycin, gentamycin, co-trimoxazole, tetracycline, and trimetoprim. The most resistance pattern in A. baumannii stains isolated from goat and camel meat samples belongs to trimetoprim. Some research findings in other research groups revealed the same result as our investigation; however, some research findings contradicted with our findings. For example, Francey et al. showed the clinical characteristics of several pets with various A. baumannii infections such as urinary, respiratory, wound and bloodstream infections. Their findings revealed an overall attributable mortality of 47% [12]. A research discovery presented that all 16 A. baumannii isolates from food-producing animals were sensitive to imipenem, meropenem, and ciprofloxacin and piperacillin/tazobactam; however, those samples were resistant to ceftazidime [20]. In another survey on 16 A. baumannii isolates, the outcomes proved 100% sensitivity to carbapenems, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and piperacillin/tazobactam; nonetheless, those samples were resistant to amoxicillin, cefradine, trimethoprim, and chloramphenicol [21].

    In a research project by Rafei et al. (2015) [22], a total of 73 water samples, 51 soil samples, 37 raw cow milk samples, 50 cow meat samples, 7 raw cheese samples, and 379 animal samples were analyzed to detect the presence of A. baumannii. A. baumannii was found in 6.9% of water samples, 2.7% of milk samples, 8.0% of meat samples, 14.3% of cheese samples, and 7.7% of animal samples. All isolates in this survey presented a susceptible phenotype to most of the antibiotics tested with seldom findings regarding carbapenemase-encoding genes, except one that harbored a blaOXA-143 gene. This study verified that animals could be a potential reservoir for A. baumannii and dissemination of new emerging carbapenemases.

    Gram-Negative Bacteria (GNB) that possessed A. baumannii with some other species had been assessed and isolated from mastitic milk samples of dairy cattle. Findings revealed that half of the GNB isolates were resistant to 5 or more of the 12 tested antimicrobial agents [23]. Some antibiotic agents were evaluated in 57 A. baumannii bulk tank milk (BTM) isolated samples; their findings showed resistance patterns to cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and colistin [24].

    In the current survey, it can be inferred that although most of the isolated samples were resistant against antibiotics, more than half of A. baumannii stains isolated from sheep samples were resistant against streptomycin, gentamycin, co-trimoxazole, tetracycline, and trimetoprim. For goat and camel meat positive samples, the highest resistance belongs to trimetoprim. The most represented antibiotic resistance genes in sheep meat samples were fimH, aac(3)-IV, sul1 and Integron Class I. Interestingly, the dfrA1 gene has been represented in most samples in all three sample groups; however, none of the isolated stains revealed the qnr gene. Entirely, almost 90% of each isolated cluster were represented with Integron Class I. A. baumannii were isolated mainly from sheep, goat and camel meat samples in Iran; hence, animals should be considered as a potential reservoir of multidrug-resistant A. baumannii. Due to various factors involved in the infection in different animal species, further studies are crucial for gaining a better understanding of the origins of this infection in humans. Some limitation factors noted in the current study were restricted sample population, retrospective data analysis, unreliable species identification methods, or unique reports of accidental observations.


    Acknowledgments



    The authors would like to thank Dr. Abbas Farahani for his assistance in sample collection and PCR genetic alignments. This work was financially supported by the Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord Branch, Shahrekord, Iran.

    Conflict of interest



    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    [1] Huang L, Sun L, Yan Y (2013) Clonal spread of carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii ST92 in a Chinese Hospital during a 6-year period. J Microbiol 51: 113–117. doi: 10.1007/s12275-013-2341-4
    [2] Almasaudi SB (2018) Acinetobacter spp. As nosocomial pathogens: Epidemiology and resistance features. Saudi J Biol Sci 25: 586–596.
    [3] Peleg AY, Seifert H, Paterson DL (2008) Acinetobacter baumannii: emergence of a successful pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 21: 538–582. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00058-07
    [4] Dahiru M, Enabulele O (2015) Acinetobacter baumannii in birds' feces: A public health threat to vegetables and irrigation farmers. Adv Microbiol 5: 693–698. doi: 10.4236/aim.2015.510072
    [5] Guardabassi L, Schwarz S, Lloyd DH (2004) Pet animals as reservoirs of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother 54: 321–332. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh332
    [6] Jung J, Park W (2015) Acinetobacter species as model microorganisms in environmental microbiology: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99: 2533–2548. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6439-y
    [7] APIC guide (2010) Guide to the elimination of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii transmission in healthcare settings. Washington, DC: APIC Headquarters. Available from: https://apic.org/Resource_/EliminationGuideForm/b8b0b11f-1808-4615-890b-f652d116ba56/File/APIC-AB-Guide.pdf
    [8] Kurcik-Trajkovska B (2009) Acinetobacter spp.-A serious enemy threatening hospitals worldwide. Macedonian J Med Sci 2: 157–162.
    [9] Barnhart MM, Chapman MR (2006) Curli biogenesis and function. Annu Rev Microbiol 60: 131–147. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.60.080805.142106
    [10] Müller S, Janssen T, Wieler LH (2014) Multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in veterinary medicine-emergence of an underestimated pathogen? Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 127: 435–446.
    [11] Vaneechoutte M, Devriese LA, Dijkshoorn L, et al. (2000) Acinetobacter baumannii-infected vascular catheters collected from horses in an equine clinic. J Clin Microbiol 38: 4280–4281.
    [12] Francey T, Gaschen F, Nicolet J, et al. (2000) The role of Acinetobacter baumannii as a nosocomial pathogen for dogs and cats in an intensive care unit. J Vet Intern Med 14: 177–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2000.tb02233.x
    [13] Espinal P, Seifert H, Dijkshoorn L, et al. (2012) Rapid and accurate identification of genomic species from the Acinetobacter baumannii (Ab) group by MALDI-TOF MS. Clin Microbiol Infect 18: 1097 –1103. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03696.x
    [14] Momtaz H, Seifati SM, Tavakol M (2015) Determining the prevalence and detection of the most prevalent virulence genes in Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from hospital infections. Int J Med Lab 2: 87–97.
    [15] Tavakol M, Momtaz H, Mohajeri P, et al. (2018) Genotyping and distribution of putative virulence factors and antibiotic resistance genes of Acinetobacter baumannii strains isolated from raw meat. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 7: 120. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0405-2
    [16] CLSI (2017) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-fifth informational supplement. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
    [17] Kiani S, Momtaz H, Serajian AA, et al. (2016) Detection of integrons in Acinetobacter baumannii strains isolated from the nosocomial infections of Ahvaz city and their relation with the resistance pattern. Int J Med Lab 3: 50–63.
    [18] Endimiani A, Hujer KM, Hujer AM, et al. (2011) Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from pets and horses in Switzerland: molecular characterization and clinical data. J Antimicrob Chemother 66: 2248–2254. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr289
    [19] Al Atrouni A, Joly-Guillou ML, Hamze M, et al. (2016) Reservoirs of non-baumannii acinetobacter species. Front Microbiol 7: 49.
    [20] Hamouda A, Vali L, Amyes SG (2008) Gram-negative non-fermenting bacteria from food-producing animals are low risk for hospital-acquired infections. J Chemother 20: 702–708. doi: 10.1179/joc.2008.20.6.702
    [21] Hamouda A, Findlay J, Al Hassan L, et al. (2011) Epidemiology of Acinetobacter baumannii of animal origin. Int J Antimicrob Agents 38: 314–318. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.06.007
    [22] Rafei R, Hamze M, Pailhoriès H, et al. (2015) Extrahuman epidemiology of Acinetobacter baumannii in Lebanon. Appl Environ Microbiol 81: 2359–2367. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03824-14
    [23] Nam HM, Lim SK, Kim JM, et al. (2010) In vitro activities of antimicrobials against six important species of gram-negative bacteria isolated from raw milk samples in Korea. Foodborne Pathog Dis 7: 221–224. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2009.0406
    [24] Gurung M, Nam HM, Tamang MD, et al. (2013) Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter from raw bulk tank milk in Korea. J Dairy Sci 96: 1997–2002. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5965
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Ayman Elbehiry, Eman Marzouk, Ihab M. Moussa, Turki M. Dawoud, Ayman S. Mubarak, Dalia Al-Sarar, Roua A. Alsubki, Jwaher H. Alhaji, Mohamed Hamada, Adil Abalkhail, Hassan A. Hemeg, Rasha N. Zahran, Acinetobacter baumannii as a community foodborne pathogen: Peptide mass fingerprinting analysis, genotypic of biofilm formation and phenotypic pattern of antimicrobial resistance, 2021, 28, 1319562X, 1158, 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.11.052
    2. Jeong Ho Jeon, Kyung-Min Jang, Jung Hun Lee, Lin-Woo Kang, Sang Hee Lee, Transmission of antibiotic resistance genes through mobile genetic elements in Acinetobacter baumannii and gene-transfer prevention, 2023, 857, 00489697, 159497, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159497
    3. Suzane Olachea Allend, Marcelle Oliveira Garcia, Kamila Furtado da Cunha, Déborah Trota Farias de Albernaz, Mirian Elert da Silva, Rodrigo Yudi Ishikame, Luciano Aparecido Panagio, Gerson Nakazaro, Guilherme Fonseca Reis, Daniela Brayer Pereira, Daiane Drawanz Hartwig, Biogenic silver nanoparticle (Bio‐AgNP) has an antibacterial effect against carbapenem‐resistant Acinetobacter baumannii with synergism and additivity when combined with polymyxin B , 2022, 132, 1364-5072, 1036, 10.1111/jam.15297
    4. Md Mazharul Islam, Elmoubashar Farag, Mohammad Mahmudul Hassan, Khalid A. Enan, K. V. Mohammad Sabeel, Maryam Mohammed Alhaddad, Maria K. Smatti, Abdulla Mohammad Al-Marri, Abdul Azia Al-Zeyara, Hamad Al-Romaihi, Hadi M. Yassine, Ali A. Sultan, Devendra Bansal, Zilungile Mkhize-Kwitshana, Diversity of bacterial pathogens and their antimicrobial resistance profile among commensal rodents in Qatar, 2022, 46, 0165-7380, 487, 10.1007/s11259-021-09876-2
    5. Abdullah Kaviani Rad, Angelika Astaykina, Rostislav Streletskii, Yeganeh Afsharyzad, Hassan Etesami, Mehdi Zarei, Siva K. Balasundram, An Overview of Antibiotic Resistance and Abiotic Stresses Affecting Antimicrobial Resistance in Agricultural Soils, 2022, 19, 1660-4601, 4666, 10.3390/ijerph19084666
    6. Masda Admi, Darmawi Darmawi, Teuku Reza Ferasyi, Dasrul Dasrul, Phylogenetic Tree 16S rRNA Gene of Acinetobacter soli Isolated from the Prepuce of Aceh Cattle, 2022, 10, 1857-9655, 1487, 10.3889/oamjms.2022.10312
    7. Manal Hadi Ghaffoori Kanaan, Zena Kassem Khalil, Hawazin Thamir Khashan, Abdolmajid Ghasemian, Occurrence of virulence factors and carbapenemase genes in Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis isolated from chicken meat and egg samples in Iraq, 2022, 22, 1471-2180, 10.1186/s12866-022-02696-7
    8. Mevhibe TERKURAN, Zerrin ERGİNKAYA, Fatih KÖKSAL, Molecular characterization of antibiotic resistance, aminoglycoside and PmrA genes among foodborne and clinical Acinetobacter spp., 2023, 1300-0861, 10.33988/auvfd.1113432
    9. Bhupamani Das, Kruti Debnath Mandal, Abhinav Suthar, Chinmoy Maji, 2023, 9781119896111, 267, 10.1002/9781119896142.ch20
    10. Alaa A. Shaker, Ahmed Samir, Hala M. Zaher, Khaled A. Abdel-Moein, The Burden of Acinetobacter baumannii Among Pet Dogs and Cats with Respiratory Illness Outside the Healthcare Facilities: A Possible Public Health Concern, 2024, 1530-3667, 10.1089/vbz.2024.0082
    11. Jing Qian, Zheyuan Wu, Yongzhang Zhu, Chang Liu, One Health: a holistic approach for food safety in livestock, 2022, 1, 29497043, 100015, 10.1016/j.soh.2023.100015
    12. Zahra Hasiri, Ebrahim Rahimi, Hassan Momtaz, Amir Shakerian, Ali Akbar, Prevalence and Phenotypic and Genotypic Patterns of Antibiotic Resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii Strains Isolated from Fish, Shrimp, and Lobster Samples, 2023, 2023, 1745-4549, 1, 10.1155/2023/6245225
    13. Ayidh M. Almansour, Meshari A. Alhadlaq, Khaloud O. Alzahrani, Lenah E. Mukhtar, Abdulmohsen L. Alharbi, Sulaiman M. Alajel, The Silent Threat: Antimicrobial-Resistant Pathogens in Food-Producing Animals and Their Impact on Public Health, 2023, 11, 2076-2607, 2127, 10.3390/microorganisms11092127
    14. Omar E. Ahuatzin-Flores, Eduardo Torres, Edith Chávez-Bravo, Acinetobacter baumannii, a Multidrug-Resistant Opportunistic Pathogen in New Habitats: A Systematic Review, 2024, 12, 2076-2607, 644, 10.3390/microorganisms12040644
    15. Shobhna Singh, Gauri Chandratre, Gulshan Narang, Detection of Bacterial Pathogens from the Pneumonic Lungs of Sheep and Goats and Their Antimicrobial Sensitivity Pattern, 2024, 94, 0369-8211, 69, 10.1007/s40011-023-01491-2
    16. Jawad R Alzaidi, Prevalence of OXA genes responsible for carbapenem-resistance among Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from clinical samples in Iraq, 2023, 20, 1812-156X, 632, 10.4103/MJBL.MJBL_828_23
    17. Mohamed-Yousif Ibrahim Mohamed, Glindya Bhagya Lakshmi, Hamidreza Sodagari, Ihab Habib, A One Health Perspective on Camel Meat Hygiene and Zoonoses: Insights from a Decade of Research in the Middle East, 2024, 11, 2306-7381, 344, 10.3390/vetsci11080344
    18. Nisha Kumari Jha, Venkadesaperumal Gopu, Chandran Sivasankar, Satya Ranjan Singh, Palanisamy Bruntha Devi, Ayaluru Murali, Prathapkumar Halady Shetty, In vitro and in silico assessment of anti-biofilm and anti-quorum sensing properties of 2,4-Di-tert butylphenol against Acinetobacter baumannii , 2024, 73, 0022-2615, 10.1099/jmm.0.001813
    19. Sunil Kumar, Anju Rani, Mukesh Yadav, Nirmala Sehrawat, Manoj Singh, Anil Sharma, Detection of antimicrobial resistant bacterial pathogens in the raw chicken meat samples in North India, 2024, 2229-4473, 10.1007/s42535-024-01155-0
    20. R. Toledo-Perona, Á. Gómez-Martín, A. Contreras, M. Toquet, J.J. Quereda, A. Esnal, P. González-Torres Pedro, J. Gomis Jesús, Metabarcoding analysis of the microbiota in flocks naturally infected by Coxiella burnetii: First description of the global microbiota in domestic small ruminants, 2025, 23527714, 100996, 10.1016/j.onehlt.2025.100996
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5145) PDF downloads(616) Cited by(20)

Figures and Tables

Tables(8)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog