Research article

Real-time PCR assay for detection of Staphylococcus aureus, Panton-Valentine Leucocidin and Methicillin Resistance directly from clinical samples

  • Received: 25 November 2018 Accepted: 26 March 2019 Published: 21 May 2019
  • Rapid detection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important concern for both treatment and implementation of infection control policies. The present study provides an ‘in house’ real-time PCR assay to detect directly nuc, pvl, and mecA genes. The assay is able to perform identification of MRSA, Methicillin-Sensitive S. aureus, Methicillin-Resistant Coagulase Negative Staphylococci and the Panton-Valentine leukocidin virulence gene from rectal and pharyngeal swab samples in a screening context. We found an analytical sensitivity of this current Triplex PCR assay of 514 CFU/mL. Analytical specificity was tested with different Gram-positive and Gram-negative species and yielded no false-positive PCR signal. The sensitivity and specificity of the Triplex Real Time PCR were both 100% for these targets when compared with the culture and conventional methods. This assay is readily adaptable for routine use in a microbiology laboratory, as it will enable the implementation of timely and properly guided therapy and infection control strategies.

    Citation: Liliana Galia, Marco Ligozzi, Anna Bertoncelli, Annarita Mazzariol. Real-time PCR assay for detection of Staphylococcus aureus, Panton-Valentine Leucocidin and Methicillin Resistance directly from clinical samples[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(2): 138-146. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.2.138

    Related Papers:

    [1] Maureen U. Okwu, Mitsan Olley, Augustine O. Akpoka, Osazee E. Izevbuwa . Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and anti-MRSA activities of extracts of some medicinal plants: A brief review. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(2): 117-137. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.2.117
    [2] Jan-Peter Hildebrandt . Pore-forming virulence factors of Staphylococcus aureus destabilize epithelial barriers-effects of alpha-toxin in the early phases of airway infection. AIMS Microbiology, 2015, 1(1): 11-36. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2015.1.11
    [3] Manjusha Lekshmi, Parvathi Ammini, Jones Adjei, Leslie M. Sanford, Ugina Shrestha, Sanath Kumar, Manuel F. Varela . Modulation of antimicrobial efflux pumps of the major facilitator superfamily in Staphylococcus aureus. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(1): 1-18. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.1.1
    [4] Ligozzi Marco, Galia Liliana, Bertoncelli Anna, Mazzariol Annarita . Intrinsic role of coagulase negative staphylococci norA-like efflux system in fluoroquinolones resistance. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(4): 908-914. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.4.908
    [5] Natalia Y. Kovalskaya, Eleanor E. Herndon, Juli A. Foster-Frey, David M. Donovan, Rosemarie W. Hammond . Antimicrobial activity of bacteriophage derived triple fusion protein against Staphylococcus aureus. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(2): 158-175. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.2.158
    [6] Anthonia O. Oluduro, Yetunde M. Adesiyan, Olumide O. Omoboye, Adebowale T. Odeyemi . Phenotypic and molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus from mobile phones in Nigeria. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(3): 402-418. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023021
    [7] Jia Wang, Feiyang Zhao, Huzhi Sun, Qian Wang, Can Zhang, Wenhua Liu, Ling Zou, Qiang Pan, Huiying Ren . Isolation and characterization of the Staphylococcus aureus bacteriophage vB_SauS_SA2. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(3): 285-307. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.3.285
    [8] Afraa Said Al-Adawi, Christine C. Gaylarde, Jan Sunner, Iwona B. Beech . Transfer of bacteria between stainless steel and chicken meat: A CLSM and DGGE study of biofilms. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(3): 340-358. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.3.340
    [9] Angela Tramonti, Fiorenzo De Santis, Eugenia Pennacchietti, Daniela De Biase . The yhiM gene codes for an inner membrane protein involved in GABA export in Escherichia coli. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(1): 71-87. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.1.71
    [10] Yen Thi Ngoc Phan, Minh Thuy Tang, Tu Thi Minh Tran, Van Huu Nguyen, Trang Hien Nguyen, Takeshi Tsuruta, Naoki Nishino . Diversity of lactic acid bacteria in vegetable-based and meat-based fermented foods produced in the central region of Vietnam. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(1): 61-70. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.1.61
  • Rapid detection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important concern for both treatment and implementation of infection control policies. The present study provides an ‘in house’ real-time PCR assay to detect directly nuc, pvl, and mecA genes. The assay is able to perform identification of MRSA, Methicillin-Sensitive S. aureus, Methicillin-Resistant Coagulase Negative Staphylococci and the Panton-Valentine leukocidin virulence gene from rectal and pharyngeal swab samples in a screening context. We found an analytical sensitivity of this current Triplex PCR assay of 514 CFU/mL. Analytical specificity was tested with different Gram-positive and Gram-negative species and yielded no false-positive PCR signal. The sensitivity and specificity of the Triplex Real Time PCR were both 100% for these targets when compared with the culture and conventional methods. This assay is readily adaptable for routine use in a microbiology laboratory, as it will enable the implementation of timely and properly guided therapy and infection control strategies.


    Staphylococcus aureus plays an important role as human pathogen causing a wide range of infections and is a major cause of nosocomial infections [1]. MRSA has emerged as an important public health concern, causing significant morbidity, mortality and prolonged hospitalization and a trend of increasing prevalence in numerous countries and regions. MRSA strains differ from methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) strains due to the insertion of the staohylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) into on the chromosome gene orfX of the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec). The SCCmec element is a mobile genetic element, which harbors the single determinant for methicillin resistance, namely the mecA or mecC gene. These genes encode PBP2a enzymes that have low affinity for all β-lactams, except for the fifth generation cephalosporins such as ceftaloridine or ceftobiprole. Acquisition of mecA renders β-lactams useless against MRSA and alternative therapies need to be used in serious infections.

    MRSA strains can be distinguished between in hospital-acquired (HA-MRSA) and community-acquired (CA-MRSA). CA-MRSA strains are reported to belong to SCCmec type IV, V, or VI. Compared to HA-MRSA strains, CA-MRSA are usually susceptible to macrolides and fluoroquinolones antibiotics and may produce Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL).

    PVL, a two component cytotoxin able to form pores that destroy leukocytes [2], accounts also for the high virulence potential of CA-MRSA [3] and may also induce expression of other virulence factors [4]. S. aureus strains producing PVL are involved in skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), necrotizing pneumonia [5] and osteomyelitis [6][8].

    Rapid detection of MRSA is imperative for both treatment and implementation of infection control policies to prevent disease spread and outbreaks [9]. Molecular methods, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time PCR, have been used for rapid MRSA identification [10]. PVL real-time PCR assay was also developed [11]. Fast and accurate identification of S. aureus [12] and detection of methicillin resistance are crucial for immediate treatment with effective antibiotics, which will result in decreased morbidity and mortality rates [13]. Moreover, the PVL locus is a virulence factor, useful for molecular diagnosis [14].

    In addition to S. aureus, coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) have also become increasingly important in recent years. They are particularly associated with the use of indwelling or implanted foreing bodies. Moreover a large proportion of CoNS resulted methicillin resistant (MRCoNS) harbouring the mecA gene [15]

    The present study describes an ‘in house’ triplex PCR assay developed to identify and differentiate MRSA (Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus), MSSA (Methicillin- Sensitive S. aureus), MRCoNS (Methicillin-Resistant Coagulase Negative Staphylococci) and to detect the Panton-Valentine leukocidin virulence gene, directly from clinical samples even heavy contaminated as rectal or pharyngeal swabs.

    A multiplex TaqMan PCR method for the detection of PVL-encoding genes, mecA (for detection of methicillin resistance) and nuc (for identification of S. aureus) genes was initially developed using reference strains, S. aureus ATCC 25913 (MSSA) and ATCC 700699 (MRSA).

    Both strains were incubated for 24 h on Mannitol Salt Agar (MSA) plates. Nucleic acids were extracted with a Microlab Nimbus apparatus (Hamilton Robotics, NV, USA) from 350 µl of 0.5 McF suspension according to the manufacturer's instructions and recovered in 100 µl of elution buffer.

    The nucleotide sequence of mecA, pvl and nuc genes of S. aureus were obtained from the GenBank® database and used in the design of primer and probe sequences (Table 1) which were evaluated for specificity using the standard nucleotide comparison tool: BLASTN (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The probes were labeled with three different fluorescent dyes (FAM, VIC, NED) at the 5′ end and included a minor groove binder molecule and non fluorescent quencer (MGB-NFQ) at the 3′ end.

    Table 1.  primers and probes used for Real-time PCR.
    Target GenBank® Accession number Primer/Probe Sequence → position Amplicon size
    mecA fw CAATGCCAAAATCTCAGGTAAAGTG 1931–1957
    mecA KC243783.1 mecA rev AACCATCGTTACGGATTGCTTC 2018–2018 107
    mecA Probe FAM-ATGAGCTATATGAGAACGG-MGBNFQ 1958–1979
    pvl fw AAATGCTGGACAAAACTTCTTGG 606–624
    pvl X72700.1 pvl rev TTTGCAGCGTTTTGTTTTCG 693–712 108
    pvl Probe VIC-AAATGCCAGTGTTATCC-MGBNFQ 636–653
    nuc fw GGCATATGTATGGCAATTGTTTC 25–48
    nuc DQ50738 nuc rev CGTATTGCCCTTTCGAAACATT 76–97 73
    nuc Probe NED-ATTACTTATAGGGATGGCTATC-MGBNFQ 49–71

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The 25 µl reaction mixture contained 10 µl of DNA template, 2.5 µl of primers (900nM) and probe (250 nM), 12.5 µl 2X Master mix (Applied Biosystem CA, USA) Multiplex real-time PCR was performed on an ABI 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems).

    Thermocycler conditions consisted of an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by amplification that was performed during 38 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 sec and annealing/extension at 60 °C for 30 sec. Multiple fluorescent signals were obtained once per cycle upon completion of extension step. Data acquisition and analysis of the real-time PCR assay were performed using ABI 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Figure 1 shows an example of the amplification plot of the three genes using the S. aureus MDR1305 as representative strain.

    Figure 1.  Amplification plot obtained with a detection system based on the use of three fluorophores with strain S. aureus MDR1305: FAM (red line) for the detection of mecA gene, VIC (blue line) for the detection of pvl gene and NED (green line) for the detection of nuc gene.

    The Real-Time protocol was confirmed with 40 S. aureus strains, either MRSA (25) and MSSA (15) and 4 S. aureus strains producing PVL (including in MRSA group), identify by conventional culture method and by endpoint PCR for methicillin resistance and pvl gene. The specificity was checked using other Staphylococcus spp strains, other Gram-positive and Gram-negative. All S. aureus strains were recognized by amplification of the nuc gene, while there was no amplification of this gene by other Staphylococcus spp, or other bacteria species.

    The analytical sensitivity was evaluated using serial dilutions of cell stocks. The sensitivity of the assay was evaluated using 2 MRSA clinical isolates, 2 MSSA clinical isolates, and the reference strains ATCC 25923 (MSSA) and ATCC 700699 (MRSA). A serial dilution of cultured S. aureus ranging from 5 × 108 to 5 × 10 CFU/ml n NaCl was analyzed. To establish the Limit of Detection (LoD), genomic DNA extracted from each dilution was tested in 5 replicates. The lowest concentration of serial dilution that yielded positive test results in 95% he replicates were set as the LoD (approximately 18 copies/reaction). The analytical sensitivity curve was constructed by plotting the S. aureus DNA reference strains input against the corresponding PCR threshold cycle (Ct) values. Our assay showed an efficiency > 90% with a correlation coefficient R2 > 0.99. The linearity of this assay is detectable in 10-fold scalar dilutions (n = 5 for each dilution) from 5 × 106 copies/mL to 5 × 102 copies/mL. To evaluate intra-assay and inter-assay reproducibility, we calculated the coefficient of variation (CV) of the threshold cycle (CT) values of serial DNA specific for mecA, nucA and pvl target gene in triplicate. We assayed intra-assay analysis with 10-fold serial dilutions (from 5 × 105 copies/mL to 5 × 102 copies/mL) of the same target DNA. The analysis of coefficient of variation (CV) calculated on Ct average was less than 2% for all dilutions of mecA, nucA and pvl DNA target. Figure 2 shows the amplification curves and dilution end point standard curves of log10 genome versus Ct cycle number of nuc (green), mecA (red) and pvl (blue) genes. The analytic sensitivity of this assay for each gene was approximately 500 CFU/mL.

    Figure 2.  Amplification curves and dilution end point standard curves of log10 genome versus Ct cycle number of nuc (green), mecA (red) and pvl (blue) genes.

    Analytical specificity was evaluated using DNA lysates prepared from 20 phenotypically and genotypically well-characterized methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus spp., namely S. haemolyticus (8), S. hominis (4), S. epidermidis (8), and 13 other Gram-positive, namely Enterococcus faecalis (9), Enterococcus faecium (4), and some Gram-negative strains usually found in rectal swabs such as Escherichia coli (20), Proteus vulgaris (8), Enterobacter cloacae (8), Klebsiella pneumoniae (10).

    Routinely, we screen pharyngeal and rectal swabs, collected using eSwab (Copan, Brescia, Italy), for MRSA during surveillance of multi-drug-resistant program. Screening is conducted streaking samples on Mannitol Salt Agar plus a cefoxitin disk (30 µg) and Columbia blood agar homemade plates with 5% sheep blood. Positive strains were grown for 24 h and identified by MALDI-TOF (Bio-Mérieux). The methicillin resistance was tested by Vitek2 (BioMérieux) following EUCAST interpretation guidelines.

    A retrospective assay was conducted on 38 pharyngeal and 42 rectal swabs collected from 80 hospitalized patients. All samples were analyzed in parallel using both culture-based method and PCR-based analysis (Table S1). Viable bacterial counts were determined after 18 h of growth at 37 °C. All isolates were identified by MALDI-TOF procedure and, subsequently, tested against antimicrobial agents through broth micro-dilution procedure and EUCAST interpretation criteria (http://www.eucast.breakpoints.org). S. aureus ATCC 25923 and S. aureus ATCC 700699 were used as quality control. Methicillin resistant S. aureus isolates carrying the mecA gene were evaluated by cefoxitin disk diffusion test (30 µg). According to the Eucast guidelines, a zone of growth inhibition around the cefoxitin disk of < 22 mm indicates the presence of mecA gene and the isolate should be reported as MRSA. All isolated S. aureus strains were also checked for mecA gene by end-point PCR [16].

    The pvl were amplified only by the four S. aureus know to harbor this gene. In the same way mecA gene was detected only in the 25 MRSA strains and in the MRCoNS.

    We found an analytical sensitivity of this current Triplex PCR assay of 514 CFU/mL. PCR assays, with three replicates per sample, consistently detected MRSA alone at 18 copies per reaction.

    The analytical specificity evaluated with different Staphylococcus spp, Gram positive and Gram-negative strains was of 100% since none of the strains used to test specificity amplified nuc, pvl and mecA genes and no false positive was registered.

    We applied our triplex RT-PCR assay on 80 clinical samples analyzed in parallel with culture method and MALDI-TOF identification, as summarized in Figure 3. No positive samples were detected for pvl gene. The agreement between culture method/MALDI-TOF procedure and our molecular assay was of 100%. The sensitivity and specificity of the Triplex real time RT-PCR were both 100% for these targets when compared with the culture and conventional methods.

    Figure 3.  Results summary of Triplex real time PCR assay applied directly to 80 clinical samples.

    This triplex real time PCR assay is able to simultaneously identify the species, the meticillin resistance and the presence of the necrotizing toxin present in the community strains in only one hour, directly from the clinical sample, thus reducing reporting times and activating immediately clinical therapy or decolonization measures

    The results obtained with the triplex real-time PCR assay were compared with the results from a culture method, considered as the standard method. This assay was able to differentiate between S. aureus and CoNS. In addition, the triplex real time PCR assay differentiates methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant strains and the presence of PVL toxin gene locus, and detecting nuc, pvl, and mecA genes is able to perform identification of MRSA, MSSA, PVL-positive MRSA (PPMRSA), PVL-positive MSSA (PPMSSA), methicillin resistant CoNS (MRCoNS). No unrelated Gram-positive and Gram-negative species yielded any false-positive PCR signal. This assay is readily adaptable for use in routine microbiology laboratory, as it will enable the implementation of timely and properly guided therapy and infection control strategies. The assay provides a valuable tool for the rapid and accurate characterization of staphylococci, as automatic DNA extraction directly from sample, amplification cycles and post-PCR analyses are completed in less than 3 hours. Comparing to the assay developed by Söderquist et al. [17], our assay doesn't need to pre-treat clinical samples by broth enriched method. Our assay was validate starting directly from heavy contaminated clinical samples (rectal swab and pharingeal swab) during multidrug resistant screening program and show a very high sensititity and specificity. Okolie et al. [18] developed a pentaplex PCR assay, using the spa gene marker indeed of nuc gene for S. aureus detection, that is usually used. Added markers were the bacterial marker 16S rRNA and a marker for coagulase-negative staphylococci. The last will be a good improvement of our assay. Okolie et al. [18] tested their assay in spiked bloodcultures which generally have a higher bacterial load than clinical samples.

    In conclusion, we develop a highly specific and sensitive triplex real-time PCR assay to apply directly from clinical swab specimens to detect MRSA, MSSA both in combination with pvl gene and MRCoNS without any need of broth enrichment step. This assay might be useful in the microbiological screening of colonized patients, especially those who need to undergo heart surgery and need to be decolonized for staphylococci.


    Abbreviation MRSA: Methicillin resistant ; MSSA: Methicillin susceptible ; MRCoNS: Methicillin reistant Coagulase Negative Staphilococci; PVL: Panton valentine leucocidin; PCR: Polymerase chain reaction; CFU: Colonies forming unit; PBP2a: Penicillin binding protein 2a;

    Conflicts of interests



    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.

    [1] Gordon RJ, Lowy FD (2008) Pathogenesis of Methicilln-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection. Clin Infect Dis. 46: S350–S359. doi: 10.1086/533591
    [2] Meyer F, Girardot R, Piemont Y, et al. (2009) Analysis of the specificity of Panton-Valentine leucocidin and gamma-hemolysin F component binding. Infect Immun 77: 266–273. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00402-08
    [3] Vandenesch F, Lina G, Gillet Y, et al. (2009) The end of the controversy: Panton Valentine is the culprit. Med Sci 25: 984–986.
    [4] McDonald RR, Antonishyn NA, Hansen T, et al. (2005) Development of a triplex real-time PCR assay for detection of Panton-Valentine leukocidin toxin genes in clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 43: 6147–6149. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.12.6147-6149.2005
    [5] Shallcross LJ, Fragaszy E, Johnson AM, et al. (2013) The role of Panton-Valentine leucocidin toxin in staphylococcal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 13: 43–54. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70238-4
    [6] Dohin B, Gillet Y, Kohler R, et al. (2007) Pediatric bone and joint infections caused by Panton- Valentine leukocidin-positive Staphylococcus aureus. Pediatr Infect Dis J 26: 1042–1048. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318133a85e
    [7] Gillet Y, Issartel B, Vanhems P, et al. (2002) Association between Staphylococcus aureus strains carrying gene for Panton-Valentine leukocidin and highly lethal necrotising pneumonia in young immunocompetent patients. Lancet 359: 753–759. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07877-7
    [8] Lina G, Piémont Y, Godail-Gamot F, et al. (1999) Involvement of Panton-Valentine leukocidin-producing Staphylococcus aureus in primary skin infections and pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 29: 1128–1132. doi: 10.1086/313461
    [9] Calfee DP, Salgado CD, Milstone AM, et al. (2014) Strategies to Prevent Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Transmission and Infection in Acute Care Hospitals. Infec Cont Hosp Epidemiol 35: 772–796. doi: 10.1086/676534
    [10] Al-Talib H, Yean CY, Al-Khateeb A, et al. (2014) Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by a newly developed dry reagent-based polymerase chain reaction assay. J Microbiol Immunol Infection 47: 484–490. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2013.06.004
    [11] Johnsson D, Molling P, Stralin K, et al. (2004) Detection of Panton-Valentine leukocidin gene in Staphylococcus aureus by Light Cycler PCR: clinical and epidemiological aspects. Clin Microbiol Infect 10: 884–889. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00976.x
    [12] Llarrull LI, Fisher JF, Mobashery S (2009) Molecular basis and phenotype of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and insights into new β-Lactams that meet the challenge. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53: 4051–4063. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00084-09
    [13] Teng CS, Lo WT, Wang SR, et al. (2009) The role of antimicrobial therapy for treatment of uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections from community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in children. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 42: 324–328.
    [14] Boyle-Vavra S, Daum RS (2007) Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: the role of Panton-Valentine leukocidin. Lab Invest 87: 3–9. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700501
    [15] Becker K, Heilmann C, Peters G (2014) Coagulase negative staphylococci. Clin Microbiol Rev 27:870–926. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00109-13
    [16] Stegger M, Andersen PS, Kearns A, et al. (2012) Rapid detection, differentiation and typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus harboring either mecA or the new mecA homologue mecA(LGA251). Clin Microbiol Infect 18: 395–400. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03715.x
    [17] Söderquist B, Neander M, Dienus O, et al. (2012) Real-time multiplex PCR for direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in clinical samples enriched by broth culture. APMIS 120: 427–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2011.02849.x
    [18] Okolie CE, Wooldridge KG, Turner DP, et al. (2015) Development of a new pentaplex real-time PCR assay for the identification of poly-microbial specimens containing Staphylococcus aureus and other staphylococci, with simultaneous detection so staphylococcal virulence and methicillin resistance markers. Mol Cell Probes 29: 144–150. doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2015.03.002
  • microbiol-05-02-138-s001.pdf
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Xuelong Chen, Honghai Wang, Chang Liu, Yanping Qi, Weina Guo, Technical note: Development of a closed-tube isothermal multiple self-matching-initiated amplification assay for visual detection of Staphylococcus aureus in milk samples, 2021, 104, 00220302, 3569, 10.3168/jds.2020-19023
    2. Thi Loi Dao, Van Thuan Hoang, Amal Magmoun, Tran Duc Anh Ly, Sophie Alexandra Baron, Linda Hadjadj, Naomie Canard, Tassadit Drali, Frédérique Gouriet, Didier Raoult, Philippe Parola, Pierre Marty, Jean-Marc Rolain, Philippe Gautret, Acquisition of multidrug-resistant bacteria and colistin resistance genes in French medical students on internships abroad, 2021, 39, 14778939, 101940, 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101940
    3. Dilek DÜLGER, Seda EKİCİ, Özgür ALBUZ, Ahu PAKDEMİRLİ, Investigation of Nasal Staphylococcus aureus carriage in hospital employees and rapid detection of PVL and mecA genes by RT-PCR, 2020, 31, 1016-3573, 47, 10.35864/evmd.731631
    4. Van-Thuan Hoang, Thi-Loi Dao, Tran Duc Anh Ly, Frédérique Gouriet, Linda Hadjadj, Khadidja Belhouchat, Kamel Larbi Chaht, Saber Yezli, Badriah Alotaibi, Didier Raoult, Philippe Parola, Sophie Alexandra Baron, Vincent Pommier de Santi, Jean-Marc Rolain, Philippe Gautret, Acquisition of multidrug-resistant bacteria and encoding genes among French pilgrims during the 2017 and 2018 Hajj, 2021, 0934-9723, 10.1007/s10096-020-04122-0
    5. Jianhua Huang, Qing Fan, Mingquan Guo, Minfeng Wu, Shutian Wu, Shuzhan Shen, Xiuli Wang, Hongwei Wang, Octenidine dihydrochloride treatment of a meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilm-infected mouse wound, 2021, 30, 0969-0700, 106, 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.2.106
    6. Alexandra P. Cunha, Raquel Henriques, Susana Cardoso, Paulo P. Freitas, Carla M. Carvalho, Rapid and multiplex detection of nosocomial pathogens on a phage‐based magnetoresistive lab‐on‐chip platform, 2021, 118, 0006-3592, 3164, 10.1002/bit.27841
    7. Ya-Lei Wang, Xin Zhang, Quan Wang, Peng-Xuan Liu, Wei Tang, Rong Guo, Hai-Yang Zhang, Zhao-Guo Chen, Xian-Gan Han, Wei Jiang, Rapid and visual detection of Staphylococcus aureus in milk using a recombinase polymerase amplification-lateral flow assay combined with immunomagnetic separation, 2022, 133, 1365-2672, 3741, 10.1111/jam.15811
    8. A.D. Khosravi, S. Khoshnood, E. Abbasi Montazeri, N. Jomehzadeh, M. Moradi, F. Shahi, The application of the loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 2022, 45, 20522975, 100960, 10.1016/j.nmni.2022.100960
    9. Van Ngo Thai Bich, Tan Khanh Nguyen, Thao Dao Thi Thu, Linh Thuy Thi Tran, Sa Vo Duong Nguyen, Ho Le Han, Long-Hung Dinh Pham, Trung Hoang Thanh, Van Hoa Duong, Tuan Anh Trieu, Manh Hung Tran, Phu Tran Vinh Pham, Investigating the antibacterial mechanism of Ampelopsis cantoniensis extracts against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus via in vitro and in silico analysis, 2023, 0739-1102, 1, 10.1080/07391102.2023.2187218
    10. Deepshikha Bhowmik, Bhaskar Jyoti Das, Monalisha Hazarika, Debadatta Dhar Chanda, Amitabha Bhattacharjee, Transcriptional analysis of prsA and vraTS regulatory system in methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus against oxacillin stress, 2022, 40, 02550857, 57, 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2021.10.009
    11. Adeiza Suleiman, Onaolapo Ademola, Olayinka Olalekan, Constellation of methicillin-resistant genomic islands (SCCmec) among nasal meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates, 2021, 38, 0351-6083, 360, 10.5937/afmnai38-25349
    12. Amna Mahmood, Amtul Jamil Sami, Real Time Paper Based Detection of Streptococcus bovis using Chromogenic Substrate in Resource Constrained Environments, 2022, 2790-9352, 171, 10.54393/pjhs.v3i07.344
    13. Yanath Belguesmia, Giuseppe Spano, Djamel Drider, Potentiating effects of leaderless enterocin DD14 in combination with methicillin on clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus S1 strain, 2021, 252, 09445013, 126864, 10.1016/j.micres.2021.126864
    14. Syahirah Samsudin, Hassanain Al-Talib, Zaini Mohd Zain, Panton-Valentine Leucocidin-Positive Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriers in a Tertiary Hospital in Selangor-Malaysia, 2022, 16, 09737510, 2543, 10.22207/JPAM.16.4.18
    15. Joo-Kyung Kim, Gyu-Min Lim, Eun-Jung Kim, Wooseong Kim, Chang-Soo Lee, Byung-Gee Kim, Hee-Jin Jeong, Generation of Recombinant Antibodies in HEK293F Cells for the Detection of Staphylococcus aureus, 2022, 7, 2470-1343, 9690, 10.1021/acsomega.1c07194
    16. Colin Wood, Jason Sahl, Sara Maltinsky, Briana Coyne, Benjamin Russakoff, David Panisello Yagüe, Jolene Bowers, Talima Pearson, SaQuant: a real-time PCR assay for quantitative assessment of Staphylococcus aureus, 2021, 21, 1471-2180, 10.1186/s12866-021-02247-6
    17. A. Shil, B. Bishayi, M. Sikdar (ne’e Bhakta), Prevalence of community-associated Staphylococcus aureus strains among university students, 2021, 11, 2083-1617, 65, 10.5604/01.3001.0015.6400
    18. Andrea Sanchini, Recent Developments in Phenotypic and Molecular Diagnostic Methods for Antimicrobial Resistance Detection in Staphylococcus aureus: A Narrative Review, 2022, 12, 2075-4418, 208, 10.3390/diagnostics12010208
    19. Korakrit Imwattana, César Rodríguez, Thomas V. Riley, Daniel R. Knight, A species-wide genetic atlas of antimicrobial resistance in Clostridioides difficile , 2021, 7, 2057-5858, 10.1099/mgen.0.000696
    20. Zhengzheng Wang, Xiaoyan Feng, Fangbin Xiao, Xuekun Bai, Qian Xu, Hengyi Xu, A novel PEG-mediated boric acid functionalized magnetic nanomaterials based fluorescence biosensor for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus, 2022, 178, 0026265X, 107379, 10.1016/j.microc.2022.107379
    21. Pelin ÖZMEN, Mehmet POLAT, Rukiye YALAP, Tuğba TEZCAN, NEVŞEHİR İLİNDEKİ HEMODİYALİZ HASTALARINDA NAZAL METİSİLİN DİRENÇLİ STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS VE KOAGÜLAZ NEGATİF STAFİLOKOK TAŞIYICILIĞININ ÇEŞİTLİ YÖNTEMLERLE ARAŞTIRILMASI, 2022, 2667-7652, 23, 10.54962/ankemderg.1107848
    22. Wan-chen Tu, Anika M. McManamen, Xiaojing Su, Ingrid Jeacopello, Meg G. Takezawa, Damielle L. Hieber, Grant W. Hassan, Ulri N. Lee, Eden V. Anana, Mason P. Locknane, Molly W. Stephenson, Victoria A. M. Shinkawa, Ellen R. Wald, Gregory P. DeMuri, Karen N. Adams, Erwin Berthier, Sanitta Thongpang, Ashleigh B. Theberge, At-Home Saliva Sampling in Healthy Adults Using CandyCollect, a Lollipop-Inspired Device, 2023, 95, 0003-2700, 10211, 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c00462
    23. Jaewoong Lee, Ngoc-Tu Nguyen, Le-Minh Tran, Yang-Hoon Kim, Jiho Min, Blaire Steven, Targeted Killing of Staphylococcus aureus Using Specific Peptides Displayed on Yeast Vacuoles, 2023, 11, 2165-0497, 10.1128/spectrum.00920-23
    24. Hye-young Wang, Jaeil Ahn, Jonghoon Lee, Sang Chul Kang, Hyunil Kim, Performance of three multiplex real-time PCR assays for simultaneous detection of 12 infectious pathogens in mice affected with respiratory and digestive diseases, 2024, 11, 2297-1769, 10.3389/fvets.2024.1421427
    25. Xue Gao, Hongmei Zhang, Lu Liu, Mu Jia, Xuepeng Li, Jianrong Li, Nano-biosensor based on manganese dioxide nanosheets and carbon dots for dual-mode determination of Staphylococcus aureus, 2024, 432, 03088146, 137144, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137144
    26. Li Jin, XiaoFeng Hu, Yuan Tian, MengYa Fang, Xue Dong, YaXuan Jiang, Yao Han, Hao Li, Yansong Sun, Detection of Staphylococcus aureus virulence gene pvl based on CRISPR strip, 2024, 15, 1664-3224, 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1345532
    27. Khaled A. Abd El-Razik, Amany A. Arafa, Ehab A. Fouad, Ashraf H. Soror, Abeer M. Abdalhamed, Magdy Elgioushy, Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of erythromycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine subclinical mastitis in Egypt, 2023, 22310916, 1562, 10.14202/vetworld.2023.1562-1571
    28. Marina Yu. Nikolaeva, Konstantin N. Monakhov, Evgeny V. Sokolovskiy, Features of skin colonization with Staphylococcus spp. in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis patients, 2024, 100, 2313-6294, 51, 10.25208/vdv14873
    29. Wenyuan Zhou, Aiping Deng, Xiaoxing Fan, Yeling Han, Yajun Gao, Lei Yuan, Xiangfeng Zheng, Dan Xiong, Xuechao Xu, Guoqiang Zhu, Zhenquan Yang, Characterisation of a SapYZU11@ZnFe2O4 biosensor reveals its mechanism for the rapid and sensitive colourimetric detection of viable Staphylococcus aureus in food matrices, 2024, 122, 07400020, 104560, 10.1016/j.fm.2024.104560
    30. Kyle R. Leistikow, Daniel S. May, Won Se Suh, Gabriel Vargas Asensio, Adam J. Schaenzer, Cameron R. Currie, Krassimira R. Hristova, Zackery Bulman, Bacillus subtilis -derived peptides disrupt quorum sensing and biofilm assembly in multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus , 2024, 9, 2379-5077, 10.1128/msystems.00712-24
    31. Valeria Garzarelli, Maria Serena Chiriacò, Marco Cereda, Giuseppe Gigli, Francesco Ferrara, Ultrasensitive qPCR platform for rapid detection of bacterial contamination of raw biological samples at the point of care, 2023, 9, 24058440, e16229, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16229
    32. Hongmei Zhang, Menglong Liu, Yiyao Liu, Jingyi Xiao, Yi Ren, Xue Gao, Portable real-time determination of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Staphylococcus aureus based on smartphones and hydrogels, 2025, 325, 13861425, 125119, 10.1016/j.saa.2024.125119
    33. Alyssa P. Petersen, Hannah C. Zierden, 2024, Chapter 16, 978-1-0716-4054-8, 253, 10.1007/978-1-0716-4055-5_16
    34. Thi Loi Dao, Van Thuan Hoang, Philippe Gautret, Respiratory Carriage of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus-Encoding Gene in Hajj Pilgrims, 2024, 2210-6014, 10.1007/s44197-024-00322-5
    35. Matteo Boattini, Luisa Guarrasi, Sara Comini, Guido Ricciardelli, Roberto Casale, Rossana Cavallo, Cristina Costa, Gabriele Bianco, Diagnostic methods and protocols for rapid determination of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: a comparative analysis, 2025, 0934-9723, 10.1007/s10096-025-05039-2
    36. Aleksei A. Evdokimov, Anna A. Baldina, Anna A. Nikitina, Timur A. Aliev, Artemii M. Zenkin, Mikhail V. Zhukov, Igor S. Pantyukhin, Ekaterina V. Skorb, Anton A. Muravev, A portable electrochemical immunosensor for detection of S. aureus based on polyelectrolyte-modified screen-printed carbon electrode, 2025, 47, 22141804, 100744, 10.1016/j.sbsr.2025.100744
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(10424) PDF downloads(2099) Cited by(36)

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog