In this paper, some properties of soft radical of a soft int-ideal have been developed and soft prime int-ideal, soft semiprime int-ideal of a ring are defined. Several characterizations of soft prime (soft semiprime) int-ideals are investigated. Also it is shown that the direct and inverse images of soft prime (soft semiprime) int-ideals under homomorphism remains invariant.
Citation: Jayanta Ghosh, Dhananjoy Mandal, Tapas Kumar Samanta. Soft prime and semiprime int-ideals of a ring[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 732-745. doi: 10.3934/math.2020050
[1] | G. Muhiuddin, Ahsan Mahboob . Int-soft ideals over the soft sets in ordered semigroups. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2412-2423. doi: 10.3934/math.2020159 |
[2] | Faiz Muhammad Khan, Tian-Chuan Sun, Asghar Khan, Muhammad Junaid, Anwarud Din . Intersectional soft gamma ideals of ordered gamma semigroups. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 7367-7385. doi: 10.3934/math.2021432 |
[3] | Majdoleen Abu Qamar, Abd Ghafur Ahmad, Nasruddin Hassan . An approach to Q-neutrosophic soft rings. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(4): 1291-1306. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.4.1291 |
[4] | Rehab Alharbi, S. E. Abbas, E. El-Sanowsy, H. M. Khiamy, Ismail Ibedou . Soft closure spaces via soft ideals. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6379-6410. doi: 10.3934/math.2024311 |
[5] | Shahida Bashir, Rabia Mazhar, Bander Almutairi, Nauman Riaz Chaudhry . A novel approach to study ternary semihypergroups in terms of prime soft hyperideals. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 20269-20282. doi: 10.3934/math.20231033 |
[6] | Abdelghani Taouti, Waheed Ahmad Khan . Fuzzy subnear-semirings and fuzzy soft subnear-semirings. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2268-2286. doi: 10.3934/math.2021137 |
[7] | Faiz Muhammad Khan, Weiwei Zhang, Hidayat Ullah Khan . Double-framed soft h-semisimple hemirings. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6817-6840. doi: 10.3934/math.2020438 |
[8] | Rabia Mazhar, Shahida Bashir, Muhammad Shabir, Mohammed Al-Shamiri . A soft relation approach to approximate the spherical fuzzy ideals of semigroups. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 3734-3758. doi: 10.3934/math.2025173 |
[9] | Rehab Alharbi, S. E. Abbas, E. El-Sanowsy, H. M. Khiamy, K. A. Aldwoah, Ismail Ibedou . New soft rough approximations via ideals and its applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 9884-9910. doi: 10.3934/math.2024484 |
[10] | Baravan A. Asaad, Tareq M. Al-shami, Abdelwaheb Mhemdi . Bioperators on soft topological spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 12471-12490. doi: 10.3934/math.2021720 |
In this paper, some properties of soft radical of a soft int-ideal have been developed and soft prime int-ideal, soft semiprime int-ideal of a ring are defined. Several characterizations of soft prime (soft semiprime) int-ideals are investigated. Also it is shown that the direct and inverse images of soft prime (soft semiprime) int-ideals under homomorphism remains invariant.
In the real world, always we are facing several situations which are not exact. Classical mathematics is not enough to deal with such ambiguous situation. As a result different mathematical tools like probability theory, fuzzy set theory [1], rough set theory[2] have been introduced in different time but all these theories have inherent difficulties. To minimize such difficulties, in 1999 Molodtsov[3] introduced a new notion called soft set as a parameterized family of subsets of the universal set. Thereafter a lot of works have been done to enrich the theory of soft set as well as its applications in real life problems.
In 2007, Aktas et al. defined soft group [4] as a parameterized family of subetaoups of the given group and studied some of its properties. Extending this notion of soft group, the notions like soft ring, soft module, soft ideal are presented in [5,6,7,8,9]. Hence the concepts of hybrid structures like fuzzy soft groups (rings, ideals) are presented in [10,11,12,13,14]. Considering these notions of soft groups (rings, ideals etc.) we can not derive all the results of classical algebra in the settings of soft set theory.
In 2012, Cagman et al. introduced the group structures on a soft set using set inclusion operators, known as soft int-group[15]. After that the notions of soft int-ring[16], soft int-ideals[17,18] etc are introduced. This new notions are appropriate to study different properties of classical group theory, ring theory etc. in the settings of soft set theory.
In Section 3, some properties of soft radical of a soft int-ideal under homomorphism are studied. In Section 4, the notion of soft prime int-ideal of a ring is presented and different characterizations of it are discussed. In Section 5, the notion of soft semiprime int-ideal of a ring is presented and various characterizations of it are discussed. Also it is established that the direct and inverse images of soft prime (soft semiprime) int-ideals under homomorphism are again soft prime (soft semiprime) int-ideals.
This section is devoted to presenting some basic definitions and results from soft set theory to use in the sequel. Throughout this paper unless otherwise stated, let U refers to an initial universe, E the set of parameters, P(U) the power set of U and N the set of all natural numbers.
Definition 2.1. [3] Let A⊆E. A pair (F,A) is called a soft set of A over U when F is a mapping given by F:A→P(U).
Sometimes we call (F,A) as a soft set of A when no confusion will arise regarding the universal set U and sometimes the soft set (F,A) is simply denoted by F, when no confusions regarding the parameter set A and the universal set U arise. The collection of all soft sets with parameter set A over U will be denoted by S(A,U).
Definition 2.2. [3] Let F,G∈S(A,U). Then F is called a soft subset of G, denoted by F˜⊆G, if F(t)⊆G(t) for all t∈A.
Definition 2.3. [19] Let F,G∈S(A,U). Then the soft intersection of F,G is denoted by F˜∩G and defined by (F˜∩G)(t)=F(t)∩G(t) for all t∈A.
Definition 2.4. Let ′.′ be a binary composition in a set A and F,G∈S(A,U). Then product of F and G is defined for all x∈A as follows:
(FG)(x)=⋃x=y.z[F(y)∩G(z)] where y,z∈A
=ϕ if x is not expressible as x=y.z for y,z∈A.
Definition 2.5. [18] Let U be the universal set, E be the set of parameters and A⊆E. Then the soft characteristic function of A, denoted by χA, is defined by the soft set χA:E→P(U), where
χA(x)=U, if x∈A,
=ϕ, if x∉A.
Definition 2.6. [15] Let F∈S(A,U) and K⊆U. Then the set FK={x∈A:F(x)⊇K} is called K-inclusion subset of the soft set F.
Proposition 2.7. Let F,G∈S(A,U) and K⊆U. Then (F˜∩G)K=FK∩GK.
Definition 2.8. [15] Let F∈S(A,U) and f:A→A′ be any mapping, where A′ be a parameter set. Then the image of F under f is denoted by f(F) and defined by
f(F)(y)=⋃x∈f−1(y)F(x) if f−1(y)≠ϕ,
=ϕ otherwise,
for all y∈A′.
Definition 2.9. [15] Let A,A′ be any two parameter sets and f:A→A′ be an onto mapping. Let F∈S(A′,U). The preimage of F is denoted by f−1(F) and defined by f−1(F)(x)=F(f(x)), for every x∈A.
Definition 2.10. Let f be any mapping from a set A to a set A′. A soft set F of A is called f-invariant if for x,y∈A,
f(x)=f(y)⇒F(x)=F(y). |
Proposition 2.11. [17] Let f be a mapping from a set A to a set A′. If F is a f-invariant soft set of A, then f−1(f(F))=F.
Definition 2.12. Let F∈S(A,U). Then image of F is denoted by Im(F) and defined by Im(F)={F(x):x∈A}.
Definition 2.13. [16] Let R be a ring. A soft set F∈S(R,U) is called a soft int-ring of R if
(i)F(x−y)⊇F(x)∩F(y), and
(ii)F(xy)⊇F(x)∩F(y) for all x,y∈R.
Definition 2.14. [16] Let R be a ring. A soft set F∈S(R,U) is called a soft int-ideal of R if
(i)F(x−y)⊇F(x)∩F(y), and
(ii)F(xy)⊇F(x)∪F(y) for all x,y∈R.
Proposition 2.15. [16] Let R be a ring with unity 1 and F a soft int-ideal of R. Then
(ⅰ) F(0)⊇F(r)⊇F(1) for all r∈R.
(ⅱ) F(r1−r2)=F(0)⇒F(r1)=F(r2), where r1,r2∈R.
Theorem 2.16. [16] Let R,R′ be two ordinary rings and F,F′, soft int-rings (soft int-ideals) of R,R′ respectively. If f is a homomorphism from R onto R′, then
(i) f(F) is a soft int-ring (soft int-ideal) of R′;
(ii) f−1(F′) is a soft int-ring (soft int-ideal) of R.
Definition 2.17. [17] Let F be a soft int-ideal of a ring R over U with Im(F)={K1,K2,...,Kn} and FKi, the Ki-inclusion ideals of F, where i=1,2,...,n. Then the soft radical of F, denoted by √F, is the soft set of R defined by
√F(r)=⋃r∈√FKiKi |
i.e., union is taken over all those Ki such that r∈√FKi and √FK1,√FK2,...,√FKn are the radicals of FK1,FK2,...,FKn respectively.
Proposition 2.18. [17] Let F,G be two soft int-ideals of a ring R and √F,√G be the soft radical of F,G respectively. Then the following properties hold:
(ⅰ) √F(0)=F(0);
(ⅱ) √F is a soft int-ideal of R containing F;
(ⅲ) √√F=√F;
(ⅳ) for each r∈R,√F(r)⊇F(rn) for all n∈N;
(ⅴ) for each r∈R, there exists some n∈N such that √F(r)=F(rn);
(ⅵ) √F˜∩G=√F˜∩√G.
Note 2.19. In the proof of the Proposition (ⅱ), we have proved that √FK=(√F)K for each soft int-ideal F of R and K⊆U.
Definition 2.20. [17] A soft int-ideal F of a ring R over U is called soft semiprimary int-ideal if for all x,y∈R either F(xy)⊆F(xn) for some n∈N, or F(xy)⊆F(ym) for some m∈N.
Definition 2.21. [17] A soft int-ideal F of a ring R over U is called soft primary int-ideal if for all x,y∈R either F(xy)=F(x) or F(xy)⊆F(ym) for some m∈N.
Theorem 2.22. [20] A commutative ring R is Von Neumann regular if and only if every ideal of R is semiprime.
From this section unless otherwise stated, let R be a commutative ring with unity 1 and 0 is the zero element of R. All soft sets are to be considered with parameter set R over the universal set U.
In this section, some properties of soft radical of a soft int-ideal are investigated.
Proposition 3.1. Let F be a soft int-ideal of R and √F be the soft radical of F. Then √F(r)=⋃n∈NF(rn) for all r∈R.
Proof. Let r∈R. By the Proposition 2.18, we have √F(r)⊇F(rn) for all n∈N. Then √F(r)⊇⋃n∈NF(rn). Again by the Proposition 2.18, √F(r)=F(rn) for some n∈N. Hence ⋃n∈NF(rn)⊇√F(r). Therefore √F(r)=⋃n∈NF(rn) for all r∈R.
Proposition 3.2. Let F,G be soft int-ideals of R such that F˜⊆G. Then √F˜⊆√G.
Proof. It follows from the Proposition 3.1.
Theorem 3.3. Let F,G be soft int-ideals of R. Then √FG=√F˜∩G=√F˜∩√G.
Proof. Let r∈R. Then √FG(r)=⋃n∈N(FG)(rn)
⊇(FG)(r2m) where m∈N
⊇F(rm)∩G(rm)=(F˜∩G)(rm), for all m∈N.
Hence √FG(r)⊇⋃m∈N(F˜∩G)(rm)=√F˜∩G(r) for all r∈R.
Therefore √FG˜⊇√F˜∩G.
Again (FG)(r)=⋃r=st{F(s)∩G(t)}.
Now F(s)∩G(t)⊆F(s)⊆F(st)=F(r). Then (FG)(r)⊆F(r).
Similarly, we have (FG)(r)⊆G(r). Hence (FG)(r)⊆(F˜∩G)(r).
Therefore FG˜⊆F˜∩G. Hence √FG˜⊆√F˜∩G. So, √FG=√F˜∩G. Again by the Proposition 2.18, √F˜∩G=√F˜∩√G.
Corollary 3.4. For any soft int-ideal F of R,√Fn=√F for all n∈N, where Fn=F⋅F⋯F (n times).
Theorem 3.5. Let f:R→R′ be an epimorphism, where R,R′ be two rings and F be a soft int-ideal of R. Then f(√F)˜⊆√f(F). Moreover, if F is f-invariant soft int-ideal of R, then f(√F)=√f(F).
Proof. Suppose F is a soft int-ideal of R. Then by the Proposition 2.18, √F is a soft int-ideal of R and by the Theorem 2.16, f(F) is a soft int-ideal of R′. Let x′∈R′. Then there exists x∈R such that f(x)=x′ and hence f(xn)=x′n for all n∈N.
Now f(√F)(x′)=⋃r∈f−1(x′)√F(r)
=⋃r∈f−1(x′)⋃n∈NF(rn), by the Proposition 3.1
=⋃n∈N⋃r∈f−1(x′)F(rn)
⊆⋃n∈N⋃y∈f−1(x′n)F(y)
=⋃n∈Nf(F)(x′n)
=√f(F)(x′). Therefore f(√F)˜⊆√f(F).
If F is a f-invariant soft int-ideal of R, then by the Definition 2.10, we have ⋃y∈f−1(x′n)F(y)=F(xn), since f(xn)=x′n.
Again F(xn)⊆⋃r∈f−1(x′)F(rn)⊆⋃y∈f−1(x′n)F(y)=F(xn), since f(x)=x′.
So, ⋃r∈f−1(x′)F(rn)=⋃y∈f−1(x′n)F(y)=F(xn).
Therefore, if F is a f-invariant soft int-ideal of R, then we can put equality sign instead of set inclusion in the proof of f(√F)˜⊆√f(F). Hence f(√F)=√f(F).
Theorem 3.6. Let f:R→R′ be a homomorphism, where R,R′ be two rings. If G is a soft int-ideal of R′, then f−1(√G)=√f−1(G).
Proof. By the Proposition 2.18, √G is a soft int-ideal of R′ and by the Theorem 2.16, f−1(G) is a soft int-ideal of R. Let x∈R.
Then f−1(√G)(x)=√G(f(x))=⋃n∈NG((f(x))n)=⋃n∈NG(f(xn))
=⋃n∈Nf−1(G)(xn)=√f−1(G)(x).
Therefore f−1(√G)=√f−1(G).
In this section, at first we recall some theorems related to soft cosets and soft int-ideals. Then the notion of soft prime int-ideal of a ring is given and some properties are studied.
Theorem 4.1. [17] A soft set F of a ring R is a soft int-ring (soft int-ideal) of R if and only if K-inclusion subsets FK,K⊆F(0), are subrings (ideals) of R.
Definition 4.2. [17] Let F be a soft int-ideal of a ring R and a∈R. Then the soft set Fa of R, defined by Fa(r)=F(r−a) for all r∈R, is called the soft coset of F in R determined by a∈R.
Theorem 4.3. [17] Let F be a soft int-ideal of a ring R. Then R/F, the set of all soft cosets of a soft int-ideal F in R forms a ring with respect to binary compositions Fa+Fb=Fa+b and FaFb=Fab for all a,b∈R.
Lemma 4.4. [17] Let F be a soft int-ideal of a ring R. Then Fa=F0⇔F(a)=F(0), where a∈R.
Definition 4.5. A soft int-ideal F of R is called soft prime int-ideal if for all x,y∈R, either F(xy)=F(x) or F(xy)=F(y).
Note 4.6. From the definition of soft prime int-ideal, soft primary int-ideal and soft semiprimary int-ideal, it follows that every soft prime int-ideal of R is a soft primary int-ideal and also every soft primary int-ideal of R is a soft semiprimary int-ideal.
Theorem 4.7. If A is any prime ideal of R such that A≠R, then the soft set F of R over U, defined by
F(x)=K1, if x∈A
=K2, if x∈R∖A where K1,K2⊆U and K1⊃K2,
is a soft prime int-ideal of R.
Proof. Here Im(F)={K1,K2}. Then all the K-inclusion subsets of F,K⊆F(0) coincide with FK1=A, and FK2=R. Hence by the Theorem 4.1, F is a soft int-ideal of R. Now let x,y∈R and F(xy)⊃F(x). Then by definition of F, we have F(xy)=K1 and F(x)=K2. Hence xy∈A, but x∉A. This implies y∈A, since A is a prime ideal of a commutative ring R. Therefore F(y)=K1=F(xy). So, F is a soft prime int-ideal of R.
Theorem 4.8. A soft ideal F of R is soft prime int-ideal if and only if FK are prime ideals of R for all K⊆F(0).
Proof. Suppose F is a soft prime int-ideal of R. Then by the Theorem 4.1, FK are ideals of R for all K⊆F(0). Let x,y∈R and xy∈FK, where K⊆F(0). If x∉FK, then F(x)⊂K⊆F(xy). Since F is a soft prime int-ideal, F(xy)=F(y). Hence y∈FK. So, FK is a prime ideal of R.
Conversely, let FK are prime ideals of R for all K⊆F(0). Then by the Theorem 4.1, F is a soft int-ideal of R. Let x,y∈R and F(xy)=K. Then xy∈FK. If F(xy)⊃F(x) then x∉FK. This implies y∈FK, since FK is prime ideal of R. Hence F(y)⊇K=F(xy). This implies F(xy)=F(y), as F is a soft int-ideal. Therefore F is soft prime int-ideal of R.
Example 4.9. Let Z6 be the ring of integers modulo 6 and U=S3, the set of all permutations on the set {1,2,3}. We define a soft set F of Z6 over S3 by
F(x)={(1),(12),(123),(132)} if x∈<¯3>
={(1),(12),(123)} if x∈Z6∖<¯3>.
Suppose {(1),(12),(123),(132)}=K1 and {(1),(12),(123)}=K2. Then FK1=<¯3> and FK2=Z6. Then by the Theorem 4.8, F is a soft prime int-ideal of Z6 over S3.
Theorem 4.10. An ideal A of R is prime if and only if its soft characteristic function χA is soft prime int-ideal of R.
Proof. Here (χA)U=A,(χA)ϕ=R. Hence the result follows from the Theorem 4.8.
Theorem 4.11. A soft int-ideal F of R is soft prime if and only if F(xy)=F(x)∪F(y) for all x,y∈R.
Proof. Suppose F is a soft prime int-ideal of R. By the definition of soft int-ideal, it follows for all x,y∈R,F(xy)⊇F(x)∪F(y)…(1)
Since F is a soft prime int-ideal of R, either F(xy)=F(x) or, F(xy)=F(y). Now
F(xy)=F(x)⇒F(y)⊆F(x), by condition(1)⇒F(xy)=F(x)∪F(y).
Similarly, F(xy)=F(y)⇒F(xy)=F(x)∪F(y).
Conversely, we assume that F(xy)=F(x)∪F(y),∀x,y∈R. Let x,y∈R,F(xy)⊃F(x) and F(xy)⊃F(y). Then we have F(xy)⊃F(x)∪F(y), which contradicts our assumption. Hence either F(xy)=F(x) or F(xy)=F(y). Therefore F is a soft prime int-ideal.
Proposition 4.12. Let f:R→R′ be an epimorphism, where R,R′ be two commutative rings with unity. If F is a f-invariant soft prime int-ideal of R then f(F) is soft prime int-ideal of R′.
Proof. Suppose F is a f-invariant soft prime int-ideal of R. By the Theorem 2.16, f(F) is a soft int-ideal of R′. Let x′,y′∈R′. Since f is a epimorphism, there exists x,y∈R, such that f(x)=x′,f(y)=y′ and f(xy)=x′y′. Now we assume that
f(F)(x′y′)⊃f(F)(x′). This implies f(F)(f(xy))⊃f(F)(f(x))
⇒(f−1(f(F)))(xy)⊃(f−1(f(F)))(x)
⇒F(xy)⊃F(x), by the Proposition 2.11
⇒F(xy)=F(y), since F is a soft prime int-ideal
⇒f(F)(f(xy))=f(F)(f(y))
⇒f(F)(x′y′)=f(F)(y′).
This shows that f(F) is a soft prime int-ideal of R′.
Proposition 4.13. Let f:R→R′ be a homomorphism, where R,R′ be two commutative rings with unity. If F is a soft prime int-ideal of R′ then f−1(F) is soft prime int-ideal of R.
Proof. It follows directly from the definition of soft prime int-ideal and the Definition 2.9.
Theorem 4.14. Let f:R→R′ be an epimorphism, where R,R′ be two commutative rings with unity.
(ⅰ) Let F be a f-invariant soft set of R. Then F is soft prime int-ideal of R if and only if f(F) is a soft prime int-ideal of R′.
(ⅱ) Let F′ be a soft set of R′. Then F′ is soft prime int-ideal of R′ if and only if f−1(F′) is a soft prime int-ideal of R.
Proof. Since F is f-invariant soft set then by the Proposition 2.11, we have f−1(f(F))=F. Now let x′∈R′. Then
f(f−1(F′))(x′)=⋃x∈f−1(x′)(f−1(F′))(x)=⋃x∈f−1(x′)F′(f(x))=F′(x′). Since x′∈R′ is arbitrary, then f(f−1(F′))=F′.
Hence by the Proposition 4.12 and 4.13, the theorem follows.
Theorem 4.15. If F is a soft prime int-ideal of R, then R/F is an integral domain.
Proof. Suppose F is a soft prime int-ideal of R. Then by the Theorem 4.3, R/F forms a ring. Since R is commutative ring with unity 1,R/F is commutative ring with unity F1. Now we prove that R/F has no divisor of zero. Let Fa,Fb∈R/F such that FaFb=F0. Again FaFb=F0⇒Fab=F0⇒F(ab)=F(0), (by Lemma 4.4) ⇒ab∈FK, where K=F(0). Since F is a soft prime int-ideal, FK is also a prime ideal. Hence ab∈FK⇒ either a∈FK or b∈FK. Now a∈FK⇒F(a)=F(0)⇒Fa=F0 and b∈FK⇒F(b)=F(0)⇒Fb=F0. Thus either Fa=F0 or Fb=F0. So, R/F have no divisor of zero. This implies R/F is an integral domain.
Theorem 4.16. Let F be a soft int-ideal of R such that Im(F)={K1,K2}, where K1⊂K2. If R/F is an integral domain then F is a soft prime int-ideal.
Proof. Let x,y∈R and F(xy)⊃F(x). Then F(xy)=K2 and F(x)=K1. Since F has only two images, by Proposition 2.15, F(xy)=F(0). Hence by the Lemma 4.4, F(xy)=F(0)⇒Fxy=F0⇒FxFy=F0⇒Fx=F0 or Fy=F0, since R/F is an integral domain. So, this implies either F(x)=F(0) or F(y)=F(0). If F(x)=F(0) then F(xy)=F(x), which contradicts our assumption F(xy)⊃F(x). Therefore F(y)=F(0)=F(xy). So, F is a soft prime int-ideal of R.
Theorem 4.17. A soft int-ideal F of R is soft semiprimary int-ideal if and only if √F is a soft prime int-ideal of R.
Proof. Suppose F is a soft semiprimary int-ideal of R. Let x,y∈R. By the Proposition 2.18, we have √F is a soft int-ideal of R and
√F(xy)=F((xy)n) for some n∈N
=F(xnyn), since R is commutative ring
⊆F(xnl) or, ⊆F(ynm) for some l,m∈N, by the Definition 2.21
⊆√F(x) or, ⊆√F(y), by the Proposition 2.18.
Again √F(xy)⊇√F(x) and also √F(xy)⊇√F(x), since √F is a soft int-ideal. Hence either √F(xy)=√F(x) or, √F(xy)=√F(y). Therefore √F is a soft prime int-ideal.
Conversely, let √F be a soft prime int-ideal and x,y∈R. Then either √F(xy)=√F(x) or, √F(xy)=√F(y). Suppose √F(xy)=√F(x). Then F(xy)⊆√F(xy)=√F(x)⊆F(xm) for some m∈N. Similarly, when √F(xy)=√F(y), then F(xy)⊆F(yn) for some n∈N. Therefore F is a soft semiprimary int-ideal of R.
In this section, the notion of soft semiprime int-ideal of a ring is defined, and some properties of this notion are studied.
Definition 5.1. A soft int-ideal F of R is called soft semiprime int-ideal if for all x∈R,F(x2)=F(x).
Proposition 5.2. (ⅰ) Every soft prime int-ideal of R is soft semiprime int-ideal of R.
(ⅱ) Finite intersection of soft semiprime (soft prime) int-ideals of R is a soft semiprime int-ideal of R.
(ⅲ) For every soft int-ideal F of R,√F is the smallest soft semiprime int-ideal of R containing F.
(ⅳ) Let R be a Boolean ring. Then every soft int-ideal of R is a soft semiprime.
Proof. (ⅰ) It directly follows from the Definition of soft prime int-ideal.
(ⅱ) Let F1,F2,…,Fn be the finite collection of soft semiprime int-ideals. Then for each x∈R, we have (F1˜∩F2˜∩…˜∩Fn)(x2)
=F1(x2)∩F2(x2)∩⋯∩Fn(x2)
=F1(x)∩F2(x)∩⋯∩Fn(x)=(F1˜∩F2˜∩…˜∩Fn)(x).
Therefore F1˜∩F2˜∩…˜∩Fn is a soft semiprime int-ideal of R.
Since every soft prime int-ideal of R is soft semiprime int-ideal, then intersection of soft prime int-ideals of R is a soft semiprime int-ideal.
(ⅲ) By the Proposition 2.18, √F is a soft int-ideal of R containing F. Let x∈R and √F(x2)=K, where K⊆U. Also by the Note 2.19, we have √FK=(√F)K.
Now √F(x2)=K⇒x2∈(√F)K⇒x2∈√FK
⇒(x2)n∈FK for some n∈N⇒x2n∈FK
⇒x∈√FK=(√F)K⇒√F(x)⊇K
⇒√F(x)⊇√F(x2).
Since √F is a soft int-ideal of R,√F(x2)⊇√F(x).
Hence √F(x2)=√F(x). Since x∈R is arbitray, √F is a soft semiprime int-ideal. Now we shall prove that √F is the smallest soft semiprime int-ideal of R containing F. Let I be any soft semiprime int-ideal of R containing F such that I˜⊆√F. Let x∈R and √F(x)=K, where K⊆U. This implies x∈(√F)K=√FK⇒xn∈FK for some n∈N
⇒I(xn)⊇F(xn)⊇K
⇒I(x)=I(xn)⊇K=√F(x).
Since x∈R is arbitrary, I˜⊇√F. Hence I=√F. Therefore √F is the smallest soft semiprime int-ideal of R containing F.
(ⅳ) In a Boolean ring R,x2=x, for all x∈R. Then for any soft int-ideal F of R, we have F(x2)=F(x),∀x∈R. Therefore F is a soft semiprime int-ideal.
In the following theorem, some characterizations of soft semiprime int-ideals are given.
Theorem 5.3. Let F be a soft int-ideal of R. Then the following are equivalent.
(ⅰ) F is soft semiprime int-ideal;
(ⅱ) K-inclusion sets FK of R,K⊆F(0), are semiprime int-ideals;
(ⅲ) F(xn)=F(x) for all n∈N and x∈R;
(ⅳ) For all soft int-ideals I of R,I2˜⊆F⇒I˜⊆F;
(ⅴ) For all soft int-ideals I of R and n∈N,In˜⊆F⇒I˜⊆F;
(ⅵ) F=√F, where √F is the soft radical of F.
Proof. (i)⇔(ii): Proof is similar as Theorem 4.8.
(i)⇒(iii): At first we claim that F(x2m)=F(x) for all m∈N,x∈R. Now F(x2m)=F(x2m−1.x2m−1)=F(x2m−1), since F is a soft semiprime int-ideal and x2m−1∈R. Proceeding in this way, we have F(x2m−1)=F(x2m−2)=...=F(x2)=F(x). So, F(x2m)=F(x) for all m∈N,x∈R. Let n∈N. Then there exists k∈N such that F(xn)⊆F(x2k). Hence F(xn)⊆F(x). Again F(xn)⊇F(x), since F is a soft int-ideal. Therefore F(xn)=F(x) for all n∈N and x∈R.
(iii)⇒(i): Obvious.
(i)⇒(iv): Let x∈R. Since F is a soft semiprime int-ideal, I2˜⊆F⇒I2(x2)⊆F(x2)=F(x). Again by the Definition 2.4,
I2(x2)=⋃x2=y.z[I(y)∩I(z)] where y,z∈R
⊇I(x)∩I(x)=I(x).
Hence I(x)⊆F(x) for all x∈R. So, I˜⊆F.
(iv)⇒(i): Let x∈R and F(x2)=K. Then x2∈FK. Hence <x2>⊆FK. Define a soft int-ideal I:R→P(U) as follows:
I(a)=K if a∈<x>
=ϕ otherwise.
Then by Definition 2.4, we have I2(z)=⋃z=a.b[I(a)∩I(b)] where z,a,b∈R.
Hence I2(z)=K if z∈<x2>
=ϕ otherwise.
Therefore I2K=<x2>⊆FK⇒I2˜⊆F⇒I˜⊆F, by hypothesis.
Then K=I(x)⊆F(x)⊆F(x2)=K. Therefore F(x2)=F(x).
(iii)⇒(v): Let x∈R. Then In˜⊆F⇒In(xn)⊆F(xn)=F(x), by using (iii). Again by the Definition 2.4,
In(xn)=⋃xn=uv[I(u)∩In−1(v)]⊇I(x)∩In−1(xn−1). Proceeding in this way we have In(xn)⊇I(x)∩I(x)∩...∩I(x)=I(x). Hence I(x)⊆In(xn)⊆F(x) for all x∈R. So, I˜⊆F.
(v)⇒(iv): Obvious.
(iii)⇒(vi): Let x∈R. By the Proposition 2.18(ⅴ), there exists n∈N such that √F(x)=F(xn)=F(x). So, √F=F.
(vi)⇒(iii): Let x∈R. Then by the Proposition 2.18(ⅳ), we have F(x)=√F(x)⊇F(xn) for all n∈N. Again F(xn)⊇F(x), since F is a soft int-ideal of R. Therefore F(xn)=F(x) for all n∈N and x∈R.
Similar to the Theorems 4.7 and 4.10 on soft prime int-ideals, we get the following theorems:
Theorem 5.4. If A is any semiprime ideal of R such that A≠R, then the soft set F of R over U, defined by
F(x)=K1, if x∈A
=K2, if x∈R∖A where K1,K2⊆U and K1⊃K2,
is a soft semiprime int-ideal of R.
Theorem 5.5. An ideal A of R is semiprime if and only if its soft characteristic function χA is a soft semiprime int-ideal of R.
Example 5.6. Let Z be the ring of integers and U be the universal set. We define a soft set F of Z over U as
F(x)=K1 if x∈6Z
=K2 if x∈Z∖6Z, where K1,K2⊆U and K1⊃K2.
Then FK1=6Z and FK2=Z. Since 6Z is not a prime ideal of Z but a semiprime ideal of Z, then by the Theorem 4.8 and 5.3, F is not a soft prime int-ideal but a soft semiprime int-ideal of Z.
Example 5.7. Let Z be the ring of integers and U be the universal set. Let F,G be two soft sets of Z over U, given by
F(x)=K1 if x∈<2>
=K2 if x∈Z∖<2>, where K1⊃K2 and K1,K2⊆U.
G(x)=K3 if x∈<3>
=K2 if x∈Z∖<3> where K3⊃K2 and K3,K2⊆U.
Then F,G are two soft prime int-ideals of Z over U and
(F˜∩G)(x)=K1∩K3 if x∈<6>
=K1∩K2=K2 if x∈<2>∖<6>
=K2∩K3=K2 if x∈<3>∖<6>
=K2 if x∈Z∖(<2>∪<3>).
Since K1∩K3⊃K2, we have FK1∩K3=<6> and FK2=Z.
Since <6> is a semiprime int-ideal but not a prime int-ideal of Z, then F˜∩G is a soft semiprime int-ideal of Z but not a soft prime int-ideal of Z.
Example 5.8. Let Z be the ring of integers and U be the universal set. Let F,G be two soft sets of Z over U, given by
F(x)=K1 if x∈<2>
=K2 if x∈Z∖<2>, where K1⊃K2 and K1,K2⊆U.
G(x)=K3 if x∈<2>
=K2 if x∈Z∖<2> where K3⊃K2 and K3,K2⊆U.
Then F,G are two soft prime int-ideals of Z over U and
(F˜∩G)(x)=K1∩K3 if x∈<2>
=K2 if x∈Z∖<2>.
Hence F˜∩G is a soft prime int-ideal of Z.
Theorem 5.9. If F1,F2,...,Fn are soft prime (soft semiprime) int-ideals of R such that F1˜⊆F2˜⊆...˜⊆Fn, then n˜⋂i=1Fi and n˜⋃i=1Fi are soft prime (soft semiprime) int-ideals of R.
Corollary 5.10. If F is a soft prime int-ideal of R then the following conditions hold:
(ⅰ) F(xn)=F(x) for all n∈N and x∈R;
(ⅱ) For all soft int-ideals I of R,I2˜⊆F⇒I˜⊆F;
(ⅲ) For all soft int-ideals I of R and n∈N,In˜⊆F⇒I˜⊆F;
(ⅳ) F=√F, where √F is the soft radical of F.
Proof. By the Proposition 5.2(ⅰ), every soft prime int-ideal of R is a soft semiprime int-ideal. Hence the corollary directly follows from the Theorem 5.3.
Corollary 5.11. Let F be any soft int-ideal of R. Then F and √F are contained in the same soft prime int-ideal of R.
Proof. Suppose P be a soft prime int-ideal of R such that F˜⊆P. Let x∈R. Then by the Proposition 2.18, √F(x)=F(xn) for some n∈N,
⊆P(xn)=P(x) by the Corollary 5.10. Therefore √F˜⊆P.
Corollary 5.12. Let F be a soft prime (soft semiprime) int-ideal of R. Then √Fn=F for all n∈N.
Proof. Let F be a soft semiprime int-ideal of R. Then by the Corollary 3.4, √Fn=√F for all n∈N. Again by the Theorem 5.3, √F=F. Therefore √Fn=F for all n∈N. If F is a soft prime int-ideal of R, we get the similar result.
Theorem 5.13. If F is a soft semiprimary int-ideal of R, then √F is the smallest soft prime int-ideal of R containing F.
Proof. By the Proposition 2.18 and Theorem 4.17, we have √F is a soft prime int-ideal of R containing F. Our next task is to prove √F is the smallest soft prime int-ideal of R containing F. On the contrary, let I be any soft prime int-ideal of R containing F such that I˜⊆√F.
Let √F(x)=K where K⊆U. This implies x∈(√F)K=√FK
⇒xn∈FK for some n∈N⇒I(xn)⊇F(xn)⊇K⇒I(xn)⊇√F(x).
Again by the Corollary 5.10, I(xn)=I(x).
Hence I(xn)⊇√F(x)⇒I(x)⊇√F(x). This holds for arbitrary x∈R. So, I˜⊇√F. Hence I=√F. Therefore √F is the smallest soft prime int-ideal of R containing F.
Following the proof of the Propositions 4.12, 4.13 and Theorem 4.14, the next theorem can be obtained.
Theorem 5.14. Let f:R→R′ be an epimorphism, where R,R′ be two commutative rings with unity.
(ⅰ) Let F be a f-invariant soft set of R. Then F is soft semiprime int-ideal of R if and only if f(F) is a soft semiprime int-ideal of R′.
(ⅱ) Let F′ be a soft set of R′. Then F′ is soft semiprime int-ideal of R′ if and only if f−1(F′) is a soft semiprime int-ideal of R.
Theorem 5.15. If F is a soft semiprime int-ideal of R, then R/F has no nonzero nilpotent element.
Proof. Suppose F is a soft semiprime int-ideal of R. Then by the Theorem 4.3, R/F forms a ring. Let Fa be a nilpotent element of R/F. Then (Fa)k=F0 for some k∈N. This implies Fak=F0 and hence by the Lemma 4.4, we have F(ak)=F(0). Since F is a soft semiprime int-ideal, by the Theorem 5.3, we have F(a)=F(ak)=F(0). This implies Fa=F0. So, R/F has no nonzero nilpotent element.
Theorem 5.16. Let F be a soft int-ideal of R such that Im(F)={K1,K2}, where K1⊂K2. If R/F has no nonzero nilpotent element then F is a soft semiprime int-ideal.
Proof. Let x∈R and F(x2)⊃F(x). Since F has only two images, then by the Proposition 2.15, F(x2)=F(0). Hence by the Lemma 4.4, F(x2)=F(0)⇒Fx2=F0⇒(Fx)2=F0. Since R/F has no nonzero nilpotent element then Fx=F0. This implies F(x)=F(0), which contradicts our assumption. Hence F(x2)=F(x). Therefore F is a soft semiprime int-ideal.
Definition 5.17. Let F be a soft int-ideal of R. Then the soft int-ideal
r(F)=˜⋂{I:F˜⊆I,I is a soft prime int-ideal of R} is called a soft prime radical of F.
Proposition 5.18. Let F be any soft int-ideal of R. Then
(ⅰ) r(F) is a soft semiprime int-ideal of R containing F;
(ⅱ) √F˜⊆r(F);
(ⅲ) If F is a soft prime int-ideal of R then F=√F=r(F).
Proof. (ⅰ) It follows from the Proposition (ⅱ).
(ⅱ) By the Proposition (ⅲ), √F is the smallest soft semiprime int-ideal of R containing F. Since r(F) is a soft semiprime int-ideal of R containing F, then √F˜⊆r(F).
(ⅲ) Since F is a soft prime int-ideal of R,F is also a soft semiprimary int-ideal. Hence by the Theorem 4.17, √F is a soft prime int-ideal of R containing F. Again by the Definition 5.17, r(F) is the intersection of all soft prime int-ideals of R containing F. Hence r(F)˜⊆√F. Then by part (ⅱ), we have √F=r(F). By the Corollary 5.10, √F=F. Therefore F=√F=r(F).
Here some characterizations of Von Neumann regular with respect to soft int-ideals are presented.
Theorem 5.19. Let R be a commutative ring. Then the following conditions are equivalent:
(ⅰ) R is Von Neumann regular;
(ⅱ) FG=F˜∩G where F,G are any two soft int-ideals of R;
(ⅲ) every soft int-ideals of R is idempotent;
(ⅳ) every soft int-ideals of R is soft semiprime.
Proof. (i)⇒(ii): Let R be a and x∈R. Then there exists r∈R such that x=xrx. Now (FG)(x)=⋃x=yz{F(y)∩G(z)}.
Here F(y)∩G(z)⊆F(y)⊆F(yz)=F(x). Then (FG)(x)⊆F(x).
Similarly, we get (FG)(x)⊆G(x). Hence (FG)(x)⊆(F˜∩G)(x).
Again (FG)(x)=⋃x=yz{F(y)∩G(z)}⊇F(x)∩G(rx)⊇F(x)∩G(x)=(F˜∩G)(x). Therefore (FG)(x)=(F˜∩G)(x). Since x∈R is arbitrary, FG=F˜∩G.
(ii)⇒(iii): Let F be any soft int-ideal of R. Then by (ⅱ) F2=FF=F˜∩F=F. So, F is idempotent.
(iii)⇒(iv): Let F be any soft int-ideal of R and S be another soft int-ideal of R such that S2˜⊆F. By hypothesis S2=S. Hence S˜⊆F. Then by the Theorem 5.3, F is soft semiprime.
(iv)⇒(i): Suppose that every soft int-ideal of R is soft semiprime. Let I be any ideal of R. Then the soft characteristic function χI is a soft int-ideal of R. By hypothesis χI is soft semiprime. Then by the Theorem 5.5 I is a semiprime int-ideal of R. Hence by the Theorem 2.22, R is Von Neumann regular.
The authors are grateful to the editors and the reviewers of this journal for their comments and valuable suggestions to rectify the paper. The authors declare that there are no available sources of funding for this study.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
[1] |
L. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Inform. Control, 8 (1965), 338-353. doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
![]() |
[2] |
Z. Pawlak, Rough sets, Int. J. Inform. Comput. Sci., 11 (1982), 341-356. doi: 10.1007/BF01001956
![]() |
[3] | D. Molodtsov, Soft set theory-first results, Comput. Math. Appl., 37 (1999), 19-31. |
[4] |
H. Aktas, N. Cagman, Soft sets and soft groups, Inform. Sci., 177 (2007), 2726-2735. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2006.12.008
![]() |
[5] |
U. Acar, F. Koyuncu, B. Tanay, Soft sets and soft rings, Comput. Math. Appl., 59 (2010), 3458-3463. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.03.034
![]() |
[6] |
A. O. Atagun, A. Sezgin, Soft substructures of rings, fields and modules, Comput. Math. Appl., 61 (2011), 592-601. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.12.005
![]() |
[7] |
F. Feng, Y. B. Jun, X. Zhao, soft semirings, Comput. Math. Appl., 56 (2008), 2621-2628. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2008.05.011
![]() |
[8] |
X. Liu, D. Xiang, J. Zhan, et al. Isomorphism theorems for soft rings, Algebra Colloquium, 19 (2012), 649-656. doi: 10.1142/S100538671200051X
![]() |
[9] |
Q. M. Sun, Z. L. Zhang, J. Liu, Soft sets and soft modules, Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., 5009 (2008), 403-409. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-79721-0_56
![]() |
[10] |
A. Aygunoglu, H. Aygun, Introduction to fuzzy soft groups, Comput. Math. Appl., 58 (2009), 1279-1286. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.07.047
![]() |
[11] | Y. Celik, C. Ekiz, S. Yamak, Applications of fuzzy soft sets in ring theory, Ann. Fuzzy Math. Inform., 5 (2013), 451-462. |
[12] |
F. Feng, C. Li, B. Davvaz, et al. Soft sets combined with fuzzy sets and rough sets: A tentative approach, Soft Comput. 14 (2010), 899-911. doi: 10.1007/s00500-009-0465-6
![]() |
[13] | J. Ghosh, B. Dinda, T. K. Samanta, Fuzzy soft rings and fuzzy soft ideals, Int. J. Pure Appl. Sci. Technol. 2 (2011), 66-74. |
[14] |
X. Liu, D. Xiang, J. Zhan, Fuzzy isomorphism theorems of soft rings, Neural Comput. Appl., 21 (2012), 391-397. doi: 10.1007/s00521-010-0439-8
![]() |
[15] |
N. Cagman, F. Citak, H. Aktas, Soft int-group and its applications to group theory, Neural Comput. Appl., 21 (2012), 151-158. doi: 10.1007/s00521-011-0752-x
![]() |
[16] |
N. Cagman, F. Citak, Soft int-rings and its algebraic applications, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 28 (2015), 1225-1233. doi: 10.3233/IFS-141406
![]() |
[17] | J. Ghosh, D. Mandal, T. K. Samanta, Soft semiprimary int-ideals of a ring, Analele Universitatii Oradea Fasc. Matematica, 2 (2018), 141-151. |
[18] |
A. S. Sezer, N. Cagman, A. O. Atagun, et al. Soft Intersection Semigroups, Ideals and Bi-Ideals; a New Application on Semigroup Theory I, Filomat, 29 (2015), 917-946. doi: 10.2298/FIL1505917S
![]() |
[19] |
M. I. Ali, F. Feng, X. Liu, et al. On some new operations in soft set theory, Comput. Math. Appl., 57 (2009), 1547-1553. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2008.11.009
![]() |
[20] | D. M. Burton, First Course in Rings and Ideals, Addison-Wesley series in Mathematics, 1970. |
1. | Jayanta Ghosh, Dhananjoy Mandal, Tapas Kumar Samanta, Soft Maximal and Irreducible Int-Ideals of a Ring, 2020, 16, 1793-0057, 37, 10.1142/S1793005720500039 | |
2. | Orhan Dalkiliç, On topological structures of virtual fuzzy parametrized fuzzy soft sets, 2021, 2199-4536, 10.1007/s40747-021-00378-x | |
3. | Faiz Muhammad Khan, Tian-Chuan Sun, Asghar Khan, Muhammad Junaid, Anwarud Din, Intersectional soft gamma ideals of ordered gamma semigroups, 2021, 6, 2473-6988, 7367, 10.3934/math.2021432 | |
4. | Orhan Dalkılıç, Approaches that take into account interactions between parameters: pure (fuzzy) soft sets, 2022, 99, 0020-7160, 1428, 10.1080/00207160.2021.1978436 |