Debating New Theory in Neuroscience

2014, Volume 1, Issue 1: 1-3. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2014.1.1

Previous Article Next Article

Editorial

1.
Department of Psychology at Bon Secours St. Francis Hospital, Greenville, SC.USA;
2.
Rutgers State University, Center for Computational & Integrative Biology, 315 Penn St, Camden, NJ 08102 USA

Received: 15 April 2014 Accepted: 17 April 2014 Published: 20 April 2014

Citation: Robert A Moss, Joseph V Martin. Debating New Theory in Neuroscience[J]. AIMS Neuroscience, 2014, 1(1): 1-3. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2014.1.1

Related Papers:

[1]	Rabesandratana T. (2013). The seer of science publishing. Science 342: 66-67. doi: 10.1126/science.342.6154.66
[2]	Miller G. A. (2010). Mistreating psychology in the decades of the brain. Perspect Psychol Sci 5:716–743. DOI: 10. 1177/1745691610388774.
[3]	Wang D, Song C, & Barabasi AL. (2013). Quantifying long-term scientific impact. Science 342:127-132. DOI: 10. 1126/science. 1237825. doi: 10.1126/science.1237825
[4]	Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer S, & Jones J. (2013). Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science, 342: 468-472. DOI: 10. 1126/science. 1240474. doi: 10.1126/science.1240474

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2014 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)