Review Special Issues

Influence of everyday activities and presence of people in common indoor environments on exposure to airborne fungi

  • Received: 15 December 2015 Accepted: 15 February 2016 Published: 19 February 2016
  • In the indoor environment, occupants are exposed to airborne fungi which may cause adverse health effects. The aim of this study has been to collect and provide an overview of the available knowledge on exposure to fungi in connection with everyday domestic activities to be able to advice sensitized people and to facilitate better measurement of exposure levels. The everyday activities include e.g. bed making, walking, vacuuming, and occupancy. Pre-activity exposure levels to airborne fungi ranged between 10 to 1700 cfu/m3. In response to activity, exposure to fungi ranged from 15 to ≥31,000 cfu/m3. The levels of fungal exposure seem to decrease to background levels within app. 30–90 minutes after ceasing an activity. Activities in general cause an increase in exposure levels to fungi, and should be accounted for when correlating exposure levels with health effects. Activities with marked increases in exposure levels were bringing firewood into the house, removing mouldy bread and bed making. Dominant fungal genera found before an activity were often also dominant during an activity, but during an activity other genera were sometimes also found. In most studies fungal species were not identified. The resuspension of fungal spores from floor surfaces as a result of walking depends on the spore load on the floor. The activity induced exposure level is affected by the general exposure in a room, and factors reducing the general exposure may also reduce the activity induced exposure level. Only few studies have investigated the influence of everyday activities on fungal exposure in the home, and, additional research is required to enhance the results of activities already investigated and to describe other everyday and seasonal-related activities in homes.

    Citation: Claudia Würtz Jürgensen, Anne Mette Madsen. Influence of everyday activities and presence of people in common indoor environments on exposure to airborne fungi[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2016, 3(1): 77-95. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2016.1.77

    Related Papers:

    [1] Cíntia Sorane Good Kitzberger, Clandio Medeiros da Silva, Maria Brígida dos Santos Scholz, Maria Isabel Florentino Ferreira, Iohann Metzger Bauchrowitz, Jeferson Benedetti Eilert, José dos Santos Neto . Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of plums accesses (Prunus salicina). AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2017, 2(1): 101-112. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2017.1.101
    [2] Cíntia Sorane Good Kitzberger, Maria Brígida dos Santos Scholz, Luiz Filipe Protasio Pereira, João Batista Gonçalves Dias da Silva, Marta de Toledo Benassi . Profile of the diterpenes, lipid and protein content of different coffee cultivars of three consecutive harvests. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2016, 1(3): 254-264. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2016.3.254
    [3] Cíntia Sorane Good Kitzberger, David Pot, Pierre Marraccini, Luiz Filipe Protasio Pereira, Maria Brígida dos Santos Scholz . Flavor precursors and sensory attributes of coffee submitted to different post-harvest processing. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 700-714. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.700
    [4] Marcelo Augusto de Carvalho, Cíntia Sorane Good Kitzberger, Altamara Viviane de Souza Sartori, Marta de Toledo Benassi, Maria Brígida dos Santos Scholz, Clandio Medeiros da Silva . Free choice profiling sensory analysis and principal component analysis as tools to support an apple breeding program. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 769-784. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.769
    [5] Esteban Largo-Avila, Carlos Hernán Suarez-Rodríguez, Jorge Latorre Montero, Madison Strong, Osorio-Arias Juan . The influence of hot-air mechanical drying on the sensory quality of specialty Colombian coffee. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(3): 789-803. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023042
    [6] Dody Dwi Handoko, Anisa Maharani Kaseh, Laras Cempaka, Wahyudi David, Bram Kusbiantoro, Afifah Zahra Agista, Yusuke Ohsaki, Hitoshi Shirakawa, Ardiansyah . Effects of household-scale cooking on volatile compounds, sensory profile, and hypotensive effect of Kenikir (Cosmos caudatus). AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(1): 198-213. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023011
    [7] Namfon Samsalee, Rungsinee Sothornvit . Physicochemical, functional properties and antioxidant activity of protein extract from spent coffee grounds using ultrasonic-assisted extraction. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(3): 864-878. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021052
    [8] Nur Fajriani Suaib, Didah Nur Faridah, Dede Robiatul Adawiyah, Nuri Andarwulan . Semiquantification of volatile compounds and identification of potential volatile markers and dry aroma from robusta second-crack roasted coffee processed from several post-harvest processing. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2025, 10(1): 74-96. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2025005
    [9] Shahindokht Bassiri-Jahromi, Aida Doostkam . Comparative evaluation of bioactive compounds of various cultivars of pomegranate (Punica granatum) in different world regions. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2019, 4(1): 41-55. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.1.41
    [10] Ilaria Marotti, Giovanni Dinelli, Valeria Bregola, Sara Bosi . Nutritional characterization of Italian common bean landraces (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): fatty acid profiles for “genotype-niche diversity” fingerprints. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 543-562. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.543
  • In the indoor environment, occupants are exposed to airborne fungi which may cause adverse health effects. The aim of this study has been to collect and provide an overview of the available knowledge on exposure to fungi in connection with everyday domestic activities to be able to advice sensitized people and to facilitate better measurement of exposure levels. The everyday activities include e.g. bed making, walking, vacuuming, and occupancy. Pre-activity exposure levels to airborne fungi ranged between 10 to 1700 cfu/m3. In response to activity, exposure to fungi ranged from 15 to ≥31,000 cfu/m3. The levels of fungal exposure seem to decrease to background levels within app. 30–90 minutes after ceasing an activity. Activities in general cause an increase in exposure levels to fungi, and should be accounted for when correlating exposure levels with health effects. Activities with marked increases in exposure levels were bringing firewood into the house, removing mouldy bread and bed making. Dominant fungal genera found before an activity were often also dominant during an activity, but during an activity other genera were sometimes also found. In most studies fungal species were not identified. The resuspension of fungal spores from floor surfaces as a result of walking depends on the spore load on the floor. The activity induced exposure level is affected by the general exposure in a room, and factors reducing the general exposure may also reduce the activity induced exposure level. Only few studies have investigated the influence of everyday activities on fungal exposure in the home, and, additional research is required to enhance the results of activities already investigated and to describe other everyday and seasonal-related activities in homes.


    1. Introduction

    Sensory analysis of coffee is an important tool for monitoring coffee quality. Many techniques are available to suit the various objectives of a specific study, so it is necessary to carefully select the most appropriate technique to achieve the objectives with precision. Descriptive analysis has been used to monitor aroma formation during roasting [1]. A study of a particular attribute, such as texture, have also used descriptive analysis successfully [2]. Moreover, a sensory analysis with pre-determined attributes has been used to evaluate different ways of preparing beverages [3].

    On the other hand, the evaluation of soluble coffee consumers' purchasing preferences demands another type of technique [4]. Specific techniques are also used for the commercial evaluations of coffee, such as those available from the American Special Coffee Association [5] and the Brazilian Speciality Coffee Association [6], which can be difficult to use in scientific studies.

    Free choice profiling (FCP) is a descriptive sensory analysis based on the principle that people perceive the same characteristics in foods but express themselves differently to describe them [7].

    FCP has been used to evaluate various types of food due to the many advantages that this technique presents. For example, Thamke et al. [8] used FCP to evaluate six formulations of dark chocolate, and the results showed a high similarity among the subjective evaluations by different tasters and the sensory evaluations, rendering FCP suitable for scientific investigations. Finally, a comparison of the results of the descriptive analysis and FCP to assess the quality of hop varieties showed good concordance [9].

    This technique offers the advantage of being less time-consuming because there is no need for training individuals. Moreover, it is not necessary to develop a consensual terminology, and the number of descriptors employed may vary according to the experience of the panellists and their familiarity with the product. To accommodate different numbers and classes of attributes among panellists, FCP requires the use of generalized procrustes analysis (GPA) for data treatment. GPA transforms the data, avoiding variations or different interpretations of the attributes by the panellists while still allowing the detection of sensory differences [10]. Transformation of scale, rotation and translation are performed on the data. Transformation of scale corrects variations associated with the use of different scale amplitudes by panellists (individual settings). The second (rotation transformation) correction accounts for different interpretations of the terms and indicates panellists' agreement or disagreement in relation to the stimulus and denominations that were employed. Finally, the translation transformation corrects the intensity variations of the attributes appointed by the panellists [10,11].

    To recommend a new coffee genotype, it is important to study the impact of factors such as genetic background, soil, climate and processing on coffee quality independently. In recent years, different genotypes (collection of IPRs) resulting from crosses among Coffea arabica, Villa Sarchi and the Timor Hybrid (Sarchimor) were registered and launched by the Paraná Agronomy Institute (IAPAR). These genotypes show not only high productivity but also resistance to coffee rust comparable with that of other coffee varieties [12,13,14,15].

    Environmental conditions strongly influence coffee development and, consequently, its quality [16,17]. The effects of altitude and temperature are associated with the aroma precursors and flavours of the coffee beverage [18]. However, studies have shown that altitude has less influence on the quality of beverage in crops located in higher latitude [19].

    The coffee region of Paraná, Brazil was defined as a function of temperature and precipitation, which are the major limiting factors in the cultivation of coffee. This region is located between the parallels 23-25 South latitude and between the meridians 49-53 West longitude [20]. The temperature increase and the decrease in altitude occur from east to west in this region [21]. Historically, it has been one of the major coffee producing regions, but coffee cultivation culture is currently being replaced by soybean and corn cultivation, which are highly mechanized.

    The adaptability of cultivars to a production location is a basic condition for coffee farmers to choose and adopt new coffee cultivars. Usually, the agronomic characteristics of new cultivars are evaluated in different locations to identify their production potential. However, few studies have been conducted thus far assessing the sensory attributes of new cultivars in different locations. A large number of samples, lengthy training, and difficulty of maintaining the same team of tasters, along with scarce economic resources, are the main causes of the lack of evaluations of new cultivars.

    The objective of this study was to apply free choice profiling sensory analysis to investigate the influence of genetic variability on the sensory characteristics of the following coffee genotypes: Iapar 59, IPR 97, IPR 98, IPR 99, IPR 100, IPR 101, IPR 102, IPR 103, IPR 104, IPR 105, IPR 106, IPR 107, IPR 108 and Catuaí grown in two locations in the Paraná state, Brazil (Londrina and Mandaguari).


    2. Experimental design


    2.1. Conditions of plantations

    Coffee plants were cultivated in Mandaguari and Londrina, Paraná state, Brazil. The geographic locations and climatic conditions of the two locations are shown in Table 1. Figure 1 shows the climatic data for the development period of the coffee beans in each location.

    Table 1. Geographic region, climatic variables and characterization of the Mandaguari and Londrina.
    Local
    Mandaguari Londrina
    Latitude 23°32'52'' S 23°18'36'' S
    Longitude 51°40'15'' W 51°09'56'' W
    Altitude 650 m 585 m
    Average annual temperature 20-21 °C 21-22 °C
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 1. Mean values of temperature and pluviometric precipitation in the Mandaguari and Londrina regions.

    In Mandaguari and Londrina regions, there were adequate conditions of pluviometric precipitation and temperature (September to January) these conditions at the period of development for the beans were favorable for the complete formation of the fruits (Figure 1 and Table 1). Lower pluviometric precipitation occurred when the fruits were already in the final phase of the cycle (May to July) and were dried, ripened fruit. This pluviometric precipitation in this last phase of the phenological cycle in the years of the experiment was suitable for fast drying of the fruit (Figure 1 and Table 1).


    2.2. Coffee samples and coffee beverage

    Cherry fruits from the following fourteen arabica coffee genotypes were harvested from May to July 2010, washed and sun-dried on a patio: Catuaí, Iapar 59, IPR 97, IPR 98, IPR 99, IPR 100, IPR 101, IPR 102, IPR 103, IPR 104, IPR 105, IPR 106, IPR 107 and IPR108. Samples were standardized in a sieve (6.5 mm), and defective beans were removed. Fruit ripening, post-harvesting and drying processes were standardized to avoid interference in the descriptions of the sensory attributes of coffee beverages [22]. The genetic origins of genotypes are described in Table 2.

    Table 2. Genetic background of the arabica coffee genotypes.
    Arabica coffee genotypes Breeding
    Red Catuaí (IAC 81, register 02932)a Yellow Caturra (single mutation of Red Caturra) × Mundo Novo (hybridization of Red Bourbon and Sumatra)
    Iapar 59 (register 02324)a, IPR 97, IPR 98 (register 09950) a, IPR 99 (register 09949)a, IPR 104 Timor Hybrid × Villa Sarchi (Sarchimor)
    IPR 103 (register 09945)a Red Catuaí IAC 99 and Yellow IAC 66 × Icatu
    IPR 100, IPR 101, IPR 105 Catuaí Sh2, Sh3
    IPR 102 Catuaí and Icatu derived
    IPR 103 Icatu genetic background
    IPR 106 Icatu × Catuaí genetic background
    IPR 107 Sarchimor × Mundo Novo
    IPR 108 Sarchimor × Icatu × Catuaí
    a Registration number as Coffea arabica at the National Cultivar Registry (Registro Nacional de Cultivares—RNC) of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply (Ministério da Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimento—MAPA), Brazil [13,15].
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The coffee beans were subjected to a medium roasting process (Roaster Rod-bel, São Paulo), in which the beans were roasted for 8 to 11 minutes at 200 to 210 °C and achieved a mean weight loss of 14 ± 0.9%. The roasted coffee was then grounded (particles not exceeding 0.6 mm). A Minolta 400 colorimeter (Konica Minolta Sensing INC, Osaka, Japan) (CIE illuminant C, 10° angle and CIE standard observer) was used to assess colour characterization in the ground coffee. The coffees exhibited a lightness of 29.4 ± 1.5.

    The beverages were prepared as described by Kitzberger et al. [23], with some modifications.To prepare the beverages, 1000 mL of boiling water (98-99 °C) was added to 70 g of roasted ground coffee. After 5 minutes of extraction, the mixture was filtered through filter paper.

    The coffee was presented in plastic cups (50 mL) coded with three-digit numbers, at a temperature between 60 and 65 °C, without added sugar, in a day-light individual sensory booth in a tasting room. Mineral water and "cream cracker" biscuits were served to rinse the mouth and clean the palate between samples. Sample preparation, roasting and sensory analysis were conducted in the Physiology Laboratory of the IAPAR institute.


    2.3. Recruitment and evaluation of coffee beverages

    For the sensory analysis of coffees, we invited 13 and 16 participants/candidates to form the T1 and T2 teams, respectively. The coffee samples from Mandaguari and Londrina were analysed by T1 and T2, respectively. The candidates were between 21 and 47 years old; 60% had taken at least one college course, and all were regular consumers of coffee beverages (filtered, espresso or soluble).

    The participants received information about the products and participated in testing procedures assessing their ability to recognize basic odours and tastes. The candidates with odour recognition scores above 70% who exhibited 100% accuracy in recognizing basic tastes were selected for the panel analysis [23]. The panellists were informed about the product and testing procedures and were presented the aims of the analysis and the free choice profiling technique, as described in the registered project in the Brazilian National Ethical Research System (Sistema Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa, Certificate n° 2054.0.000.268-11).

    Because coffee has sensory complexity, and most of the panellists had no previous experience in sensory analysis, they were familiarized with the lifting technique attributes of the Network Method. In two preliminary sessions, the panellists were requested to cite terms to describe the appearance, aroma, taste and texture of food matrices (commercial orange juice and chocolate bars) to understand the analysis procedure and the definitions of the descriptors [23].

    Subsequently, we performed a study of coffee beverage attributes by presenting a pair of coffee beverages and asked the panellists to describe the similarities and differences between these beverages. From this information, we prepared individual sensory sheets. After interviews between the team leader and each panellist, we developed an individual glossary with definitions for the specific attributes used by each panellist.

    At each test session, four coffee samples were evaluated, and they were served once for each panellist. The repeatability test was performed with the IPR 99 and Iapar 59 coffees served in triplicate (over different sessions). The coffees were served in sequence in a randomized order of presentation for each panellist. At this time, the panellists received their sensory sheet and glossary. The sensory sheet was a range of 10 cm anchored at the ends with intensity expressions for the attributes [24]. Sensory evaluations were conducted in the Laboratory of Plant Physiology of Agronomic Institute of Paraná (Londrina, PR) in individual booths under white light. GPA was performed with XLStat version 2008.4.02 statistical software [25] to analyse the results.


    3. Results and Discussion


    3.1. Selection of panellists, development of the vocabulary of the attributes and evaluation of panel performance

    From the candidates, we selected twelve panellists for the T1 team and fourteen panellists for the T2 team. The number of attributes raised by panellists in the two teams ranged from 11 to 21, and multiple panellists used some of the descriptive terms. For describing the appearances of the coffees, the most commonly used attributes were colour, turbidity and brightness, whereas for the texture, the most frequent descriptor used was full-bodied. Coffee, sweet, green and burnt aromas were cited by several panellists, as well as bitter, sweet, astringent, green and acid to describe the attributes of taste (Table 3).

    Table 3. Attributes cited in the description of coffee beverages by T1 and T2 teams.
    Category Attribute N1 N2 Attribute N1 N2 Attribute N1 N2
    Appearance Coffee color 12 14 Brightness 7 9 Turbidity 4 5
    Transparence 5 5
    Aroma Coffee 11 13 Chocolate 4 4 Honey 1 1
    Sweet 10 13 Caramel 2 1 Moldy 1
    Burnt/smoke 10 11 Peanut 2 2 Bitter 1 1
    Green 11 13 Old 2 2
    Acid 5 6 Fermented 6 7
    Taste Bitter 12 14 Fermented 8 9 Peanut 1 1
    Sweet 9 10 Burnt 7 7 Coffee 2 2
    Astringent 11 13 Chocolate 3 1 Fruits 1 1
    Green 11 13 Caramel 4 4
    Acid 10 12
    Texture Full-bodied 12 13 Watery 3 3 Light 1 1
    N1 = number of panelists of T1 team that used the attribute, N2 = number of panelists of T2 team that used the attributes.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The data from the individual evaluations were used to calculate a GPA that is suitable for performing sensory analyses when the tasters have little or no training. By examining the analysis of variance from the GPA (PANOVA), we found that the greatest effects were due to translation (which corrects variations in the evaluation of attribute intensity) and scale transformation (which corrects variations associated with the use of different amplitudes), which was indicated and justified by the behaviour of the panellists who did not use the scale during training. The rotation effect correcting the different interpretations of the terms was not significant, indicating that the panellists agreed about the stimuli and the terms used for description. This behaviour was observed for both teams (T1 and T2) and was likely due to the orientation conducted to identify the attributes (Tables 4 and 5). These results allowed us to infer that there is no difference in the performance of T1 and T2; therefore, the differences between genotypes may be due to the cultivation area because the other factors were standardized.

    Table 4. PANOVA for sensorial analysis of T1 team.
    Source DF SS MS F Pr > F
    Residuals after scaling transformation 1606 4291 2.6
    Scaling transformation 11 571 51.8 19.41 < 0.0001
    Residuals after rotation 1617 4863 3
    Rotation 2310 4014 1.7 0.65 1.000
    Residuals after translation 3927 8877 2.3
    Translation 231 18,065 78.2 29.26 < 0.0001
    Corrected total 4158 26,943 6.5
    DF: Degrees of freedom, SS: Sum of squares, MS: Mean squares.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 5. PANOVA for sensorial analysis of T2 team.
    Source DF SS MS F Pr > F
    Residuals after scaling transformation 1898 8492,263 4474
    Scaling transformation 13 989,275 76,098 17.01 < 0.0001
    Residuals after rotation 1911 9481,538 4962
    Rotation 2730 5716,598 2094 0.47 1.000
    Residuals after translation 4641 15198,137 3275
    Translation 273 17826,579 65,299 14.59 < 0.0001
    Corrected total 4914 33024,716 6721
    DF: Degrees of freedom, SS: Sum of squares, MS: Mean squares.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The triplicate repetitions of the IPR 99 and Iapar 59 coffees were used to evaluate the repeatability of the results and the teams' discrimination capabilities. The consensus configurations of these samples (Figure 2a and b) confirmed the consensus among the panellists of each team, which is shown by the proximity of the configurations of these samples.

    Figure 2. Consensus configuration: (a) Coffees from Mandaguari and (b) Coffees from Londrina. Cat: Catuaí, 59: Iapar 59, 97: IPR 97, and so on.

    3.2. Evaluation of coffee beverages

    We observed good resolution in the dispersion of coffees in a two-dimensional solution (44 and 42% of Mandaguari and Londrina coffee explanations, respectively), as shown in Figure 2a and b. The remaining dimensions explained only a small proportion of the variance observed, which was very difficult to include in the interpretation of the results. The distribution of coffees in the consensus space (Figure 2a and b) is indicative of the differences among the coffees evaluated. The sensory description of coffee beverages located in each dimensions were interpreted associating the attributes closely correlated to dimension F1 and F2 (Table 6). For this association were considered only the attributes that presented correlation coefficient of greater than 0.30.

    Table 6. Frequency of the attributes in the dimensions F1 and F2 and the signal corresponding to the dimension of the correlation.
    T1 Mandaguari T2 Londrina
    Appearance F1+ F1− F2+ F2− F1+ F1− F2+ F2−
    Brightness 0.34-0.76 (3) −0.32 to −0.48 (2) 0.33 to 0.46 (3) −0.32 (1) 0.67 to 0.68 (2) −0.34 to −0.70 (4) 0.39 to 0.68 (4) −0.33 to −0.52 (3)
    Coffee color 0.32 to 0.91 (5) −0.43 to −0.84 (4) 0.33 to 0.55 (2) −0.34 to −0.77 (6) 0.66 to 0.84 (3) −0.34 to −0.63 (7) 0.43 to 0.72 (3) −0.47 (1)
    Turbidity 0.30 to 0.40 (2) −0.39 to −0.42 (2) 0.33 to 0.36 (2) −0.48 to −0.56 (2) 0.75 (1) −0.47 (1) 0.36 (1)
    Transparence 0.33 (1) −0.31 to −0.46 (2) 0.48 to 0.82 (5) 0.33 (1) −0.35 (1) 0.41 to 0.65 (2) −0.30 (2)
    Aroma
    Acid 0.39 to 0.63 (3) 0.69 (1) −0.39 to −0.40 (2)
    Coffee 0.31 to 0.76 (4) −0.41 to −0.50 (3) 0.49 (1) −0.48 to −0.60 (2) 0.55 to 0.88 (3) −0.46 to −0.56 (2) 0.31 to 0.69 (3) −0.38 to −0.52 (2)
    Chocolate 0.35 to 0.59 (2) −0.55 (1) −0.45 (1) 0.64 (1) −0.47 (1) −0.40 to −0.41 (2)
    Sweet 0.32 to 0.66 (5) −0.33 to −0.44 (3) 0.30 to 0.57 (4) 0.47 to 0.96 (3) −0.32 to −0.54 (3) 0.39 to 0.71 (4) −0.40 to −0.48 (2)
    Fermented 0.42 (1) −0.32 (1) 0.66 to 0.74 (2) −0.36 to −0.41 (2) 0.44 to 0.87 (2) −0.41 (1) 0.42 (1) −0.37 to −0.39 (2)
    Smoke 0.31 to 0.51 (2) −0.55 (1) 0.46 (1) 0.54 (1) −0.40 to −0.58 (3) −0.42 (1)
    Green 0.80 (1) −0.31 to −0.60 (3) 0.59 to 0.63 (2) −0.31 (1) 0.32 to 0.66 (4) −0.36 to −0.48 (3) 0.35 (1) −0.41 (1)
    Taste
    Acid 0.36 to 0.65 (2) −0.47 (1) 0.49 to 0.76 (2) −0.49 (1) 0.60 to 0.72 (3) −0.30 to −0.45 (2) 0.30 to 0.73 (5) −0.32 to −0.51 (3)
    Astringence 0.39 to 0.64 (2) −0.41 to −0.89 (2) 0.39 to 0.57 (2) −0.33 to −0.70 (2) 0.45 to 0.67 (3) −0.30 to −0.63 (5) 0.33 to 0.46 (5) −0.32 to −0.62 (6)
    Bitter 0.34 to 0.65 (4) −0.38 to −0.92 (3) 0.41 to 0.44 (2) −0.38 to −0.86 (2) 0.56 to 0.77 (3) −0.30 to −0.39 (4) 0.31 to 0.76 (5) −0.49 (1)
    Sweet 0.36 to 0.69 (7) −0.39 to 0.46 (3) 0.41 to 0.65 (2) 0.46 to 0.78 (3) −0.31 to −0.33 (2) 0.30 to 0.68 (4) −0.33 to −0.44 (2)
    Fermented −0.40 to −0.51 (2) −0.39 to −0.60 (2) 0.40 (1) −0.30 to −0.45 (3) −0.47 (1)
    Burnet 0.31 to 0.61 (2) −0.67 (1) 0.72 (1) −0.45 (1) 0.34 to 0.41 (2)
    Roasted 0.55 (1) −0.41 to −0.44 (2) 0.37 (1) −0.40 (1)
    Green 0.44 (1) −031 to −0.68 (2) 0.30 to 0.64 (4) −0.46 (1) 0.48 to 0.50 (2) −0.31 to −0.69 (4) 0.55 to 0.58 (2) −0.40 to −0.66 (2)
    Texture
    Watery 0.80 (1) −0.53 (1) 0.30 to 0.57 (3) −0.63 (1) 0.41 to 0.60 (2)
    Body 0.35 to 0.65 (3) 0.32 (1) −0.45 to −0.63 (3) 0.34 to 0.73 (3) 0.42 to 0.45 (2) −0.30 (1)
    Full-bodied 0.33 (1) −0.36 to −0.54 (3) 0.58 (1) 0.40 (1) −0.37 (1)
    Sum of attributes 53 36 38 31 43 49 46 34
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The coffee colour, brightness and turbidity, which are appearance attributes dependent on the roasting process, were also perceived by the panellists and were associated in both F1+ and F1− (Table 6). This observation indicates that the conditions of roasting were similar for all coffees. These appearance attributes were easily evaluated by the panellists and were mentioned by a large number of panellists in the two dimensions, which indicates consensus among them (Table 6). In contrast, attributes such as an astringent and acid taste were also similarly correlated with F1+ and F1−. As these attributes are complex, making it difficult to reach a consensus among the panellists, these attributes were less efficient at discriminating coffees. The positive (F1+) and negative (F1−) dimensions were mainly responsible for the separation of coffees from Mandaguari. Coffees positioned in the F1+ dimension were mostly characterized by (1) the appearance attributes of colour and brightness; (2) the aroma attributes of acidity, coffee, sweetness and chocolate; (3) the taste attributes of acidity, bitterness, sweetness and a burnt flavour; and 4) the texture attribute of full-body.

    Catuaí, Iapar 59, IPR 98, and IPR 99 formed this group and were described by the above attributes. With the exception of Catuaí and IPR 101 (Catuaí SH2SH3), all genotypes in F1+ had a C. canephora background (Sarchimor-Iapar 59, IPR 98 and IPR 99), Catuaí and Icatu backgrounds (IPR 103) and Sarchimor and Icatu × Catuaí backgrounds (IPR 108). Considering the genetic variability of these genotypes, we observed different sensory descriptions, promoting separation among genotypes. Interestingly, the same sensory characteristics grouped three coffees with highly similar genetic origins (Iapar 59, IPR 98 and IPR 99) with Catuaí, which is a cultivar with different genetic background.

    Transparency, coffee colour, and a green aroma; a green, bitter, fermented and astringent taste; and a watery texture, were the principal attributes correlated with F1− (Figure 2a and Table 6). IPR 97, IPR 100, IPR 102, IPR 104, IPR 105, IPR 106 e IPR 107 showed that these attributes and were separated, forming a distinct group, regardless of their genetic background (Table 2).

    In addition, the IPR 101, IPR 103 and IPR 108 genotypes with different genetic origins exhibited both F1+ and F1− sensory characteristics, suggesting that these attributes are not dependent on genetic background.

    The same group (F1−) showed some attributes that are mainly associated with immature beans. Similar attributes were found in genotypes that were associated with growing conditions unfavourable to coffee plant physiological development. It is likely that the edaphoclimatic conditions in Mandaguari contributed to the occurrence of the desirable sensory attributes found in these genotypes in the F1+ group.

    The attributes are negative to quality beverage when presented in high intensity causing disequilibrium in sensory quality. On the other hand, positive attributes are considered those that contribute to a greater appreciation of the beverage. In the present study, some genotypes (IPR 100, IPR 105 and IPR 106) showed negative and positive attributes (Figure 1a and Table 5). Similar behavior was also observed in the same genotypes evaluated in another study showed positive attributes, such as coffee colour, turbidity, and a sweet and chocolate aroma, as well as a sweet, bitter taste and a full-bodied texture [26]. Moreover, the IPR 102, IPR 104 and IPR 107 genotypes exhibited negative attributes (Figure 1a and Table 5) but were described by intermediate sensory characteristics, as mentioned in the previous studies [26].

    The coffee genotypes undergo different physiological developments, reaching maturity at different times. IPR 97, IPR 104 and IPR 107 are semi-early ripening genotypes, IPR 100 is slow ripening, and IPR 102, IPR 105 and IPR 106 are very slow ripening genotypes [27]. The attributes that indicate incomplete maturation of these coffees may be due to improper harvesting times or the rapid development of fruit in semi-early maturing genotypes. Such climatic conditions were most likely unfavourable for the complete development of the sensory characteristics because of the low accumulation and lack of formation of the precursors of these sensory attributes.

    Similar to Mandaguari, coffee grown in Londrina showed the formation of two groups, which were separated by dimension 1 positivity (F1+) and negativity (F1−). Catuaí, IPR 97, IPR 98 and IPR 100 genotypes formed the group on the left side of Figure 1b. The main attributes of this group were brightness, coffee colour, sweetness, green and a smoky aroma and astringency, acid, a fermented and green taste and a watery texture (Table 6). On the other hand, the attributes of turbidity; a green, coffee and sweet aroma; and an acid, astringent, bitter and sweet taste; and a full-bodied texture were used to describe the group formed by all of the remaining genotypes (F1+, Figure 2b).


    3.3. Performance of genotypes at two locations

    Agronomic and sensory performance in a specific location is an important factor for the coffee producer in choosing the plantation coffee genotype. In the present study, despite having similar local climatic and geographical characteristics (Table 1 and Figure 1), these parameters were sufficient to identify different attributes at each location. In both growing locations, genotypes with the same genetic origin (Iapar 59 and IPR 99) and different genetic backgrounds (IPR 101, IPR 103 and IPR 108) showed positive attributes, as shown in the F1+ dimension of Figure 2a and b. These results suggest that these genotypes presented good adaptability to climatic conditions in both locations. Interestingly, despite their different genetic origins, these genotypes are both an introgression of C. canephora, which is considered to be a more rustic coffee species than C. arabica, which may contribute to its improved adaptability.

    The IPR 97 and IPR 100 genotypes presented negative attributes associated with immature beans in both locations. This most likely indicates that they are poorly adapted to these regions. Moreover, despite the fruits being visually mature (grain colour), they had not yet reached the degree of optimum ripeness for harvest. Therefore, coffee should be collected at the point of full maturation for the manifestation of positive attributes in the resulting brew.

    In addition, the other genotypes in the F1 dimension showed different behaviours in both locations. The Catuaí and IPR 98 genotypes showed a greater number of positive attributes in Mandaguari than in Londrina. The IPR 102, IPR 104, IPR 105, IPR 106 and IPR 107 genotypes grown in Londrina showed a higher number of positive attributes than the same genotypes grown in Mandaguari.

    The IPR 102, IPR 104 and IPR 108 genotypes were located within the F1 dimension but were differentiated in each location by the F2. In Mandaguari, IPR 102 and IPR 104 exhibited a coffee colour; turbidity; a coffee and fermented aroma; and an astringent, bitter, fermented and roasted taste, as well as full-bodied texture (F2−). In Londrina, these genotypes showed a coffee colour and brightness; a sweet, coffee and green aroma; and an acid, astringent, sweet, burnt and green taste, indicating more favourable attributes at this location (F2+). On the other hand, IPR 108 received better evaluations in Mandaguari than in Londrina.

    It is also important to emphasize that the IPR 108 genotype grown in Mandaguari distanced itself from the group in the direction of F2+, mainly due to its brightness and transparency; its green and sweet aroma; its acid, astringent, bitter, sweet, and green taste; and its watery texture. Similar and different attributes were observed for this genotype when it was grown in different places of the coffee region in Paraná [28].


    4. Conclusion

    The standardization of the conditions of cultivation, harvesting, post-harvesting, roasting and beverage preparation allowed an association of the sensory attributes of individual coffee cultivars with the genetic origin of the genotypes evaluated.

    Among the many attributes identified through the free choice profiling sensory technique, brightness, coffee colour and turbidity; a coffee, sweet and green aroma; an acid, astringent, bitter, sweet and green taste; and a full-bodied texture were the attributes that had greater contributions to descriptions of coffee.

    In addition, we also found that a coffee plant containing various cultivars must take into account the optimal harvesting time for each cultivar so as not to affect coffee crop quality due to early or late maturation.

    Sensory evaluation allowed us to not only identify the genotypes with positive or negative attributes in both locations but also to identify the genotypes that have different attributes in these two locations. These behaviours suggest a different adaptation for each genotype in each location. This information is important in helping breeders select the best-adapted genotypes in each region and in educating coffee producers on the best genotype for a specific region.

    Finally, we note that edaphoclimatic growing conditions influence the sensory profiles of genotypes, independent of their genetic background. This fact shows the importance of performing adaptation studies of each genotype in each production location to obtain the maximum expression of the sensory potential of each new genotype. We also determined that some genotypes did not show good performance in both locations studied, suggesting that new genotypes should be evaluated in different edaphoclimatic conditions to meet the growing conditions for the best expression of their positive sensory attributes.


    Conflict of Interest

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.


    [1] Cruz AA, Mantzouranis E, Matricardi PM, et al. Global surveillance, prevention and control of Chronic Respiratory Diseases—A comprehensive approach. World Health Organization; 2007.
    [2] Afshari A, Anderson HR, Cohen A, et al. Dampness and Mould. WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2009.
    [3] Reponen T, Vesper S, Levin L, et al. (2011) High environmental relative moldiness index during infancy as a predictor of asthma at 7 years of age. Ann Allerg Asthma Im 107: 120-126.
    [4] Dannemiller KC, Mendell MJ, Macher JM, et al. (2014) Next generation DNA sequencing reveals that low fungal diversity in house dust is associated with childhood asthma development. Indoor Air 24: 236-247.
    [5] Behbod B, Sordillo JE, Hoffman EB, et al. (2013) Wheeze in infancy: protection associated with yeasts in house dust contrasts with increased risk associated with yeasts in indoor air and other fungal taxa. Allergy 68: 1410-1418.
    [6] Lötvall J, Akdis CA, Bacharier LB, et al. (2011) Asthma endotypes: a new approach to classification of disease entities within the asthma syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol 127: 355-360.
    [7] Radon K (2006) The two sides of the “endotoxin coin”. Occup Environ Med 63: 73-78.
    [8] Hamilos DL (2010) Allergic fungal rhinitis and rhinosinusitis. Proc Am Thora Soc 7: 245-252.
    [9] Pringle A (2013) Asthma and the diversity of fungal spores in air. Plos Pathogens 9: e1003371.
    [10] Denning DW, Pashley C, Hartl D, et al. (2014) Fungal allergy in asthma-state of the art and research needs. Clinical and Translational Allergy 4: 14.
    [11] Vesper S, Barnes C, Ciaccio CE, et al. (2013) Higher environmental relative moldiness index (ERMI) values measured in homes of asthmatic children in Boston, Kansas City, and San Diego. J Asthma 50: 155-161.
    [12] Reponen T, Lockey J, Bernstein DI, et al. (2012) Infant origins of childhood asthma associated with specific molds. J Allergy Clin Immunol 130: 639-644.
    [13] O’Connor GT (2005) Allergen avoidance in asthma: What do we do now? J Allergy Clin Immunol 116: 26-30.
    [14] Tovey E, Ferro A (2012) Time for new methods for avoidance of house dust mite and other allergens. Curr allergy asthma rep 12: 465-477.
    [15] Burge HA, Solomon WR, Muilenberg ML (1982) Evaluation of indoor plantings as allergen exposure sources. J Allergy Clin Immunol 70: 101-108.
    [16] Twaroch TE, Curin M, Valenta R, et al. (2015) Mold allergens in respiratory allergy: from structure to therapy. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 7: 205-220.
    [17] Trail F (2007) Fungal cannons: explosive spore discharge in the Ascomycota. FEMS Microbiol Lett 276: 12-18.
    [18] Frankel M, Hansen EW, Madsen AM (2014) Effect of relative humidity on the aerosolization and total inflammatory potential of fungal particles from dust-inoculated gypsum boards. Indoor Air 24: 16-28.
    [19] Madsen AM (2012) Effects of air flow and changing humidity on the aerosolisation of respirable fungal fragments and conidia of Botrytis cinerea. Appl Environ Microbiol 78: 3999-4007.
    [20] Górny RL, Reponen T, Grinshpun SA, et al. (2001) Source strength of fungal spore aerosolization from moldy building material. Atm Environ 35: 4853-4862.
    [21] Pasanen A-L, Pasanen P, Jantunen MJ, et al. (1991) Significance of air humidity and air velocity for fungal spore release into the air. Atm Environ 25a: 459-462.
    [22] Zoberi MH (1961) Take-off of mould spores in relation to wind speed and humidity. Annals of Botany 25: 53-64.
    [23] Eduard W (2009) Fungal spores: a critical review of the toxicological and epidemiological evidence as a basis for occupational exposure limit setting. Crit Rev Toxicology 39: 799-864.
    [24] Sigler L, Abbott SP, Gauvreau H (1996) Assessment of worker exposure to airborne molds in honeybee overwintering facilities. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 57: 484-490.
    [25] Madsen AM, Tendal K, Frederiksen MW (2014) Attempts to reduce exposure to fungi, ß-glucan, bacteria, endotoxin and dust in vegetable greenhouses and a packaging unit. Sci Total Environ 468: 1112-1121.
    [26] Visser MJ, Spaan S, Arts HJ, et al. (2006) Influence of different cleaning practices on endotoxin exposure at sewage treatment plants. Ann Occup Hyg 50: 731-736.
    [27] Madsen AM. Identification of Work Tasks Causing High occupational Exposure to Bioaerosols at Biofuel plants Converting Straw or Wood Chips. In: Dr.Marco Aurelio DosSantos Bernardes, editor. Environmental Impact of biofuels.InTech; 2011. 251-270.
    [28] Simon-Nobbe B, Denk U, Pöll V, et al. (2008) The spectrum of fungal allergy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 145: 58-86.
    [29] Hunter CA, Grant C, Flannigan B, et al. (1988) Mould in buildings: the air spora of domestic dwellings. Inte Biodeter 24: 81-101.
    [30] Reponen T, Lehtonen M, Raunemaa T, et al. (1992) Effect of indoor sources on fungal spore concentrations and size distributions. J Aerosol Sci 23: 663-666.
    [31] Lehtonen M, Reponen T, Nevalainen A (1993) Everyday activities and variation of fungal spore concentrations in indoor air. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 31: 25-39.
    [32] Buttner MP, Stetzenbach LD (1993) Monitoring airborne fungal spores in an experimental indoor environment to evaluate sampling methods and the effects of human activity on air sampling. Appl Environ Microbiol 59: 219-226.
    [33] Buttner MP, Cruz-Perez P, Stetzenbach LD, et al. (2002) Measurement of airborne fungal spore dispersal from three types of flooring materials. Aerobiologia 18: 1-11.
    [34] Millington WM, Corden JM (2005) Long term trends in outdoor Aspergillus/Penicillium spore concentrations in Derby, UK from 1970 to 2003 and a comparative study in 1994 and 1996 with the indoor air of two local houses. Aerobiologia 21: 105-113.
    [35] Veillette M, Knibbs LD, Pelletier A, et al. (2013) Microbial Contents of Vacuum Cleaner Bag Dust and Emitted Bioaerosols and Their Implications for Human Exposure Indoors. Appl Environ Microbiol 79: 6331-6336.
    [36] Hegarty JM, Rouhbakhsh S, Warner JA, et al. (1995) A comparison of the effect of conventional and filter vacuum cleaners on airborne house dust mite allergen. Respiratory Medicine 89: 279-284.
    [37] Siracusa A, De BF, Folletti I, et al. (2013) Asthma and exposure to cleaning products - a European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology task force consensus statement. Allergy 68: 1532-1545.
    [38] Bernstein JA, Brandt D, Rezvani M, et al. (2009) Evaluation of cleaning activities on respiratory symptoms in asthmatic female homemakers. Ann Allerg Asthma Im 102: 41-46.
    [39] Mäkelä R, Kauppi P, Suuronen K, et al. (2011) Occupational asthma in professional cleaning work: a clinical study. Occup Med 61: 121-126.
    [40] Balasubramanian R, Nainar P, Rajasekar A (2012) Airborne bacteria, fungi, and endotoxin levels in residential microenvironments: a case study. Aerobiologia 28: 375-390.
    [41] Summerbell RC, Krajden S, Kane J (1989) Potted plants in hospitals as reservoirs of pathogenic fungi. Mycopathologia 106: 13-22.
    [42] Summerbell RC, Staib F, Dales R, et al. (1992) Ecology of fungi in human dwellings. J Med Vet Mycol 30: 279-285.
    [43] Goebes MD, Boehm AB, Hildemann LM (2011) Contributions of foot traffic and outdoor concentrations to indoor airborne Aspergillus. Aerosol Sci Tech 45: 352-363.
    [44] Kildesø J, Vinzents P, Schneider T, et al. (1999) A simple method for measuring the potential resuspension of dust from carpets in the indoor environment. Textile Res J 69: 169-175.
    [45] Chen Q, Hildemann LM (2009) The effects of human activities on exposure to particulate matter and bioaerosols in residential homes. Environ Sci Technol 43: 4641-4646.
    [46] Adams RI, Miletto M, Taylor JW, et al. (2013) Dispersal in microbes: fungi in indoor air are dominated by outdoor air and show dispersal limitation at short distances. The ISME journal 7: 1262-1273.
    [47] Takahashi T (1997) Airborne fungal colony-forming units in outdoor and indoor environments in Yokohama, Japan. Mycopathologia 139: 23-33.
    [48] Mitakakis TZ, Tovey ER, Xuan W, et al. (2000) Personal exposure to allergenic pollen and mould spores in inland New South Wales, Australia. Clin Exp Allergy 30: 1733-1739.
    [49] Sessa R, Di PM, Schiavoni G, et al. (2002) Microbiological indoor air quality in healthy buildings. The New Microbiologica 25: 51-56.
    [50] Madsen AM, Matthiesen CB, Frederiksen MW, et al. (2012) Sampling, extraction and measurement of bacteria, endotoxin, fungi and inflammatory potential of settling indoor dust. J EnvironMonitor 14: 3230-3239.
    [51] Scheff PA, Paulius VK, Curtis L, et al. (2000) Indoor air quality in a middle school, Part II: Development of emission factors for particulate matter and bioaerosols. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 15: 835-842.
    [52] Brandl H, von Däniken A, Hitz C, et al. (2008) Short-term dynamic patterns of bioaerosol generation and displacement in an indoor environment. Aerobiologia 24: 203-209.
    [53] Qian J, Hospodsky D, Yamamoto N, et al. (2012) Size-resolved emission rates of airborne bacteria and fungi in an occupied classroom. Indoor Air 22: 339-351.
    [54] Hospodsky D, Yamamoto N, Nazaroff WW, et al. (2014) Characterizing airborne fungal and bacterial concentrations and emission rates in six occupied children’s classrooms. Indoor Air doi: 10.1111/ina.12172.
    [55] Yamamoto N, Hospodsky D, Dannemiller KC, et al. (2015) Indoor emissions as a primary source of airborne allergenic fungal particles in classrooms. Environ Sci Technol 49: 5098-5106.
    [56] Bush RK, Portnoy JM (2001) The role and abatement of fungal allergens in allergic diseases. J Allergy Clin Immunol 107: S430-S440.
    [57] Levetin E. Fungi. In: Burge HA, editor. Bioaerosols.Lewis Publishers; 1995, 87-120.
    [58] Sharpe RA, Bearman N, Thornton CR, et al. (2015) Indoor fungal diversity and asthma: a meta-analysis and systematic review of risk factors. J Allergy Clin Immunol 135: 110-122.
    [59] Reponen T, Lockey J, Bernstein DI, et al. (2012) Infant origins of childhood asthma associated with specific molds. J Allergy Clin Immunol 130: 639-644.
    [60] Gravesen S (1985) Indoor airborne mould spores. Allergy 40: 21-23.
    [61] Ren P, Jankun TM, Leaderer BP (1999) Comparisons of seasonal fungal prevalence in indoor and outdoor air and in house dusts of dwellings in one Northeast American county. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 9: 560-568.
    [62] Chew GL, Rogers C, Burge HA, et al. (2003) Dustborne and airborne fungal propagules represent a different spectrum of fungi with differing relations to home characteristics. Allergy 58: 13-20.
    [63] Mandal J, Brandl H (2011) Bioaerosols in Indoor Environment-A Review with Special Reference to Residential and Occupational Locations. Open Environ Biol Monit J 4: 83-96.
    [64] D’Amato G, Spieksma FThM (1995) Aerobiologic and clinical aspects of mould allergy in Europe. Allergy 50: 870-877.
    [65] Rosas I, Calderón C, Martínez L, et al. (1997) Indoor and outdoor airborne fungal propagule concentrations in Mexico City. Aerobiologia 13: 23-30.
    [66] Kozak PP, Gallup J, Cummins LH, et al. (1979) Factors of importance in determining the prevalence of indoor molds. Ann Allergy 43: 88-94.
    [67] Amend AS, Seifert KA, Samson R, et al. (2010) Indoor fungal composition is geographically patterned and more diverse in temperate zones than in the tropics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107: 13748-13753.
    [68] Gots RE, Layton NJ, Pirages SW (2003) Indoor health: background levels of fungi. AIHA J 64: 427-438.
    [69] Larsen L, Gravesen S (1991) Seasonal variation of outdoor airborne viable microfungi in Copenhagen, Denmark. Grana 30: 467-471.
    [70] Frankel M, Beko G, Timm M, et al. (2012) Seasonal variation of indoor microbial exposures and their relations to temperature, relative humidity and air exchange rates. Appl Environ Microbiol 78: 8289-8297.
    [71] Stetzenbach LD, Buttner MP, Cruz P (2004) Detection and enumeration of airborne biocontaminants. Curr Opin Biotechnol 15: 170-174.
    [72] Madsen AM (2006) Exposure to airborne microbial components in autumn and spring during work at Danish biofuel plants. Ann Occup Hyg 50: 1-11.
    [73] Licorish K, Novey HS, Kozak P, et al. (1985) Role of Alternaria and Penicillium Spores in the Pathogenesis of Asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 76: 819-825.
    [74] Bagni N, Davies RR, Mallea M, et al. (1977) [Spore concentration in cities of the European Economic Community. II. Spores of Cladosporium and Alternaria]. Acta Allergologica 32: 118-138.
    [75] Gravesen S (1979) Fungi as a Cause of Allergic Disease. Allergy 34: 135-154.
    [76] Garrett MH, Rayment PR, Hooper MA, et al. (1998) Indoor airborne fungal spores, house dampness and associations with environmental factors and respiratory health in children. Clin Exp Allergy 28: 459-467.
    [77] Adhikari A, Lewis JS, Reponen T, et al. (2010) Exposure matrices of endotoxin, (1-->3)-beta-d-glucan, fungi, and dust mite allergens in flood-affected homes of New Orleans. Sci Total Environ 408: 5489-5498.
    [78] Reponen T, Nevalainen A, Jantunen M, et al. (1992) Normal range criteria for indoor air bacteria and fungal spores in a subarctic climate. Indoor Air 2: 26-31.
    [79] Sharpe R, Thornton CR, Osborne NJ (2014) Modifiable factors governing indoor fungal diversity and risk of asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 44: 631-641.
    [80] Micheluz A, Manente S, Tigini V, et al. (2015) The extreme environment of a library: Xerophilic fungi inhabiting indoor niches. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 99: 1-7.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Maria Brígida dos Santos Scholz, Cintia Sorane Good Kitzberger, Noël Durand, Miroslava Rakocevic, From the field to coffee cup: impact of planting design on chlorogenic acid isomers and other compounds in coffee beans and sensory attributes of coffee beverage, 2018, 244, 1438-2377, 1793, 10.1007/s00217-018-3091-7
    2. Maria Brigida dos Santos Scholz, Cíntia Sorane Good Kitzberger, Sandra Helena Prudencio, Rui Sérgio dos Santos Ferreira da Silva, The typicity of coffees from different terroirs determined by groups of physico-chemical and sensory variables and multiple factor analysis, 2018, 114, 09639969, 72, 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.07.058
    3. Mayara de Souza Gois Barbosa, Julyene Silva Francisco, Maria Brigida dos Santos Scholz, Cíntia Sorane Good Kitzberger, Marta de Toledo Benassi, Dynamics of sensory perceptions in arabica coffee brews with different roasting degrees, 2019, 17, 1542-8052, 453, 10.1080/15428052.2018.1489321
    4. Altamore Luca, Ingrassia Marzia, Chironi Stefania, Columba Pietro, Sortino Giuseppe, Vukadin Ana, Bacarella Simona, Pasta experience: Eating with the five senses—a pilot study, 2018, 3, 2471-2086, 493, 10.3934/agrfood.2018.4.493
    5. Daneysa Lahis Kalschne, Thaís Biasuz, Antonio José De Conti, Marcelo Caldeira Viegas, Marinês Paula Corso, Marta de Toledo Benassi, Sensory characterization and acceptance of coffee brews of C. arabica and C. canephora blended with steamed defective coffee, 2019, 124, 09639969, 234, 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.03.038
    6. Maria Brigida dos Santos Scholz, Sandra Helena Prudencio, Cintia Sorane Good Kitzberger, Rui Sérgio dos Santos Ferreira da Silva, Physico-chemical characteristics and sensory attributes of coffee beans submitted to two post-harvest processes, 2019, 13, 2193-4126, 831, 10.1007/s11694-018-9995-x
    7. Margaret J. Hinds, 2020, MNL1320150034, 978-0-8031-7118-3, 99, 10.1520/MNL1320150034
    8. Andreea Botezatu, Carlos Elizondo, Martha Bajec, Rhonda Miller, Enzymatic Management of pH in White Wines, 2021, 26, 1420-3049, 2730, 10.3390/molecules26092730
    9. Selina Fyfe, Horst Joachim Schirra, Michael Rychlik, Annemarie van Doorn, Ujang Tinngi, Yasmina Sultanbawa, Heather E Smyth, Future flavours from the past: Sensory and nutritional profiles of green plum (Buchanania obovata), red bush apple (Syzygium suborbiculare) and wild peach (Terminalia carpentariae) from East Arnhem Land, Australia, 2022, 5, 26668335, 100136, 10.1016/j.fufo.2022.100136
    10. Xiaotong Cao, Hanjing Wu, Claudia G. Viejo, Frank R. Dunshea, Hafiz A. R. Suleria, Effects of postharvest processing on aroma formation in roasted coffee – a review, 2023, 58, 0950-5423, 1007, 10.1111/ijfs.16261
    11. Selena Ahmed, Sarah Brinkley, Erin Smith, Ariella Sela, Mitchell Theisen, Cyrena Thibodeau, Teresa Warne, Evan Anderson, Natalie Van Dusen, Peter Giuliano, Kim Elena Ionescu, Sean B. Cash, Climate Change and Coffee Quality: Systematic Review on the Effects of Environmental and Management Variation on Secondary Metabolites and Sensory Attributes of Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora, 2021, 12, 1664-462X, 10.3389/fpls.2021.708013
    12. Thayna Viencz, Claudimara da Silva Portela, Rodrigo Barros Rocha, Enrique Anastácio Alves, André Rostand Ramalho, Marta de Toledo Benassi, Sensory description of beverages of intervarietal hybrids of Conilon and Robusta: Natural and fermented coffees, 2023, 0887-8250, 10.1111/joss.12893
    13. Mercy Bientri Yunindanova, Sastia Prama Putri, Hengky Novarianto, Eiichiro Fukusaki, Characteristics of kopyor coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) using sensory analysis and metabolomics-based approach, 2024, 13891723, 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2024.02.008
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2016 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(6127) PDF downloads(1184) Cited by(23)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(7)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog