Figure 1.
Map of Great Casablanca and their world location.
This study presents the relationships between ambient air pollutants and morbidity and emergency department visits among children and adults performed in Great Casablanca, the most populated and economic region in Morocco. This research was analyzed using conditional Poisson model for the period 2011–2013. In the period of study, the daily average concentrations of SO2, NO2, O3 and PM10 in Casablanca were 209.4 µg/m3, 61 µg/m3, 113.2 µg/m3 and 75.1 µg/m3, respectively. In children less than 5 years old, risk of asthma could be increased until 12% per 10 µg/m3 increase in NO2, PM10, SO2 and O3. In children over 5 years and adults, an increase of 10 µg/m3 air pollutant can cause an increase until 3% and 4% in respiratory consultations and acute respiratory infection, respectively. Similarly, impact on emergency department visits due to respiratory and cardiac illness was established. Our results suggest a not negligible impact on morbidity of outdoor air pollution by NO2, SO2, O3, and PM10.
Citation: Chakib Nejjari, Abdelghafour Marfak, Ahmed Rguig, Abderrahmane Maaroufi, Ihssane El Marouani, Abderrafii El Haloui, Bouchra El Johra, Rachid Ouahabi, Rachid Moulki, Amina Idrissi Azami, Youness El Achhab. Ambient air pollution and emergency department visits among children and adults in Casablanca, Morocco[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2021, 8(2): 285-302. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021022
| [1] | Rolf Nieder, Dinesh K. Benbi . Integrated review of the nexus between toxic elements in the environment and human health. AIMS Public Health, 2022, 9(4): 758-789. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2022052 |
| [2] | Emanuele Amodio, Luca Cavalieri d’Oro, Elisabetta Chiarazzo, Carlo Picco, Maurizio Migliori, Isabella Trezzi, Silvano Lopez, Oliviero Rinaldi, Massimo Giupponi . Emergency department performances during overcrowding: the experience of the health protection agency of Brianza. AIMS Public Health, 2018, 5(3): 217-224. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2018.3.217 |
| [3] | Yelena Ogneva-Himmelberger, Tyler Dahlberg, Kristen Kelly, Tiffany A. Moore Simas . Using Geographic Information Science to Explore Associations between Air Pollution, Environmental Amenities, and Preterm Births. AIMS Public Health, 2015, 2(3): 469-486. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.3.469 |
| [4] | Mohy Uddin, Aldilas Achmad Nursetyo, Usman Iqbal, Phung-Anh Nguyen, Wen-Shan Jian, Yu-Chuan Li, Shabbir Syed-Abdul . Assessment of effects of moon phases on hospital outpatient visits: An observational national study. AIMS Public Health, 2023, 10(2): 324-332. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023024 |
| [5] | Dreaves Hilary A . How Health Impact Assessments (HIAs) Help Us to Select the Public Health Policies Most Likely to Maximise Health Gain, on the Basis of Best Public Health Science. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(2): 235-241. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.2.235 |
| [6] | Terri Rebmann, Kristin D. Wilson, Travis Loux, Ayesha Z. Iqbal, Eleanor B. Peters, Olivia Peavler . Outcomes, Approaches, and Challenges to Developing and Passing a Countywide Mandatory Vaccination Policy: St. Louis County’s Experience with Hepatitis A Vaccine for Food Service Personnel. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(1): 116-130. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.1.116 |
| [7] | George Pontisidis, Thalia Bellali, Petros Galanis, Nikolaos Polyzos . Effect of triage training on nurses with Emergency severity index and Australian triage scale: Α quasi-experimental study. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(4): 1049-1070. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024054 |
| [8] | James A. Swartz, Dana Franceschini, Nora M. Marino, Adrienne H. Call, Lisa Rosenberger, Sarah Whitehouse . Barriers and facilitators to prescribing buprenorphine for treating opioid use disorder among emergency department and other practice setting physicians. AIMS Public Health, 2025, 12(1): 56-76. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2025005 |
| [9] | Elizabeth Burner, Sophie Terp, Chun Nok Lam, Emily Neill, Michael Menchine, Sanjay Arora . Access to care, nativity and disease management among Latinos with diabetes in a safety-net healthcare setting. AIMS Public Health, 2019, 6(4): 488-501. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2019.4.488 |
| [10] | Larrell L. Wilkinson, Saundra H. Glover, Janice C. Probst, Bo Cai, Lisa T. Wigfall . Psychological Distress and Health Insurance Coverage among Formerly Incarcerated Young Adults in the United States. AIMS Public Health, 2015, 2(3): 227-246. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.3.227 |
This study presents the relationships between ambient air pollutants and morbidity and emergency department visits among children and adults performed in Great Casablanca, the most populated and economic region in Morocco. This research was analyzed using conditional Poisson model for the period 2011–2013. In the period of study, the daily average concentrations of SO2, NO2, O3 and PM10 in Casablanca were 209.4 µg/m3, 61 µg/m3, 113.2 µg/m3 and 75.1 µg/m3, respectively. In children less than 5 years old, risk of asthma could be increased until 12% per 10 µg/m3 increase in NO2, PM10, SO2 and O3. In children over 5 years and adults, an increase of 10 µg/m3 air pollutant can cause an increase until 3% and 4% in respiratory consultations and acute respiratory infection, respectively. Similarly, impact on emergency department visits due to respiratory and cardiac illness was established. Our results suggest a not negligible impact on morbidity of outdoor air pollution by NO2, SO2, O3, and PM10.
Upper Acute Respiratory Infection;
lower acute respiratory infection;
Pneumonia;
Severe Pneumonia;
Sore Throat;
Very Serious Diseases;
Respiratory Consultations (RC);
Acute Respiratory Disease;
Emergency Department Visits;
World Health Organization;
Great Casablanca;
Exceeding Standard Ratio;
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Air pollution is now considered to be a significant public health issue, responsible for an increasingly range of health effects that are well recognized from epidemiological studies conducted in many regions of the world [1]–[3]. The latest estimate from the World Health Organization (WHO) reported that in 2012, approximately 3.7 million deaths were attributable to ambient air pollution and about 88% of these deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries, which represent 82% of the world population [4]. According to recent studies performed in the metropolises, a statistically significant association was observed between particulate matter, gaseous pollutants and mortality and department admissions for respiratory and cardiovascular diseases [5]–[8]. Furthermore, several studies confirmed that people from around the world are still exposed to concentrations exceeding the WHO recommendations attracting a great deal of attention from the government and the public [9]–[11].
The 2005 “WHO Air quality guidelines” offer global guidance on thresholds and limits for key air pollutants: particulate matter (PM), ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and sulfur dioxide (SO2), which pose health risks in all WHO regions [12]. PM consists of a complex mixture of solid and liquid particles of organic and inorganic substances suspended in the air. The most health-damaging particles are those with a diameter of 10 microns or less (PM10), which can penetrate and lodge deep inside the lungs [10]. Ozone is one of the major constituents of photochemical smog and it has been associated with increases in mortality and hospital admissions due to respiratory and cardiovascular disease [13]–[15]. Largest epidemiologic studies of air pollution suggests that short-term exposure to NO2 [16] and SO2 [17] is associated with adverse health effects and increased mortality risk. In a recent study in Beijing, the authors concluded that for lag 2, a 10 µg/m3 increase in concentration of PM10, SO2 and NO2 were associated with 1.7%, 1.3%, and 2.6% increases respectively in respiratory disease emergency admissions [18]. Also, it has been shown that PM10 was associated to antibiotics use [19].
More recently, it has been demonstrated that air pollution is also associated with the spread of COVID-19 [20],[21]. Authors found that an increase in NO2, and O3 result in increase in the daily counts of confirmed cases. Conversely, an increase of SO2 result in decrease in COVID-19 confirmed cases. The relation among atmospheric stability based on wind speed, air pollution and the spread of COVID-19 has been well established [21]–[26]. Cities with low wind speed and frequently high levels of air pollution had higher numbers of COVID-19 cases.
Due to its high population density, intense industrial activities and large traffic volume, the Great Casablanca (GC) is suffering from intense air pollution during the last two decades [27]–[29]. However, there are rare studies on the potential health effects of air pollution in Morocco and other African countries. This first study aimed to analyze the short-term effects of PM10, SO2, NO2 and O3 on the exposed population in the GC, notably the association between air pollution and respiratory morbidity and related-treatment.
Casablanca is the largest city of Morocco, located in the central-western part of the country on the Atlantic Ocean (33°32′N7°35′W) with an urban population of 3.71 million inhabitants and an area of 220 km2. The Great Casablanca (GC) consisted of two prefectures and two provinces: Prefecture of Casablanca; Prefecture of Mohammedia; Nouaceur Province and Mediouna Province (Figure 1). The Greater Casablanca region is considered the locomotive of the development of the Moroccan economy. Casablanca is the industrial center of Morocco with more than half of the country's factories [28]. The study on atmospheric emission inventory, for the year 1992 in the GC, showed very large emissions of pollutants mainly due to the presence of a refinery and several power plants [27].
Daily concentrations of O3, NO2, SO2 and PM10 (µg/m3) and daily relative humidity (%) and temperature (°C) during the study period were obtained from the Meteorological Administration. The four pollutants were measured by seven automated environmental monitoring stations installed in 7 geographical zones in Casablanca. These stations measure each 15 minutes air pollution levels originating from exhaust gasses and other sources of pollution. SO2 is measured by fluorescence ultraviolet according to the EN 14212 method, NO2 by chemiluminescence analyzer according to the EN 14211 method, O3 by ultraviolet absorption according to the EN 14625 method and PM10 by gravimetric method. For each day, we calculated daily concentration for each pollutant as the average of the 96x7 measurements (1 measurement each 15 min during 24 hours by each station). The relative humidity was measured using a psychrometer installed 2 meters above ground level in a louvered, double-roofed shelter. All data were collected from November 1, 2011 to October 31, 2013.
The study sample represents all residents from the GC. Data on morbidity (hospitalization and consultation) of residents in the corresponding areas were extracted from different structures: university hospital center, 9 hospitals, 35 primary care centers, 9 respiratory diseases centers, 11 communal hygiene offices. Hospitalization data refer to public and private hospitals. Consultations data of children (under 5 years) and of adults and youths were extracted from public and private hospitals, respiratory diseases centers and primary care centers. At the end of each day, the physicians filled out a form designed for this study and sent it to the data collection coordinator. This form included the socio-demographic characteristics and the health problem constituting the object of the consultation at the health facility. All morbidity data were collected from November 1, 2011 to October 31, 2013. The morbidity variables were upper acute respiratory infection (UARI, ICD-10: J06.9), lower acute respiratory infection (LARI, ICD-10: J22), pneumonia (PN, ICD-10: J18.9), severe pneumonia (SPN), asthma (ICD-10: J45), sore throat (ST, ICD-10: R07.0), earaches (ICD-10: H92.09), very serious diseases (VSD), respiratory consultations (RC), acute respiratory disease (ARD), conjunctivitis (ICD-10: H10.9) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, ICD-10: J44.9). We also collected the number of antibiotic and bronchodilator prescriptions. We divided the study data into two sets of data depending on the nature of the disease. Thus UARI, LARI, PN, SPN, asthma, ST, earaches, and VSD have been studied in children under 5 years. RC, ARD, conjunctivitis and COPD have been studied in children over 5 years and adults. Only asthma, prescriptions of antibiotics and bronchodilators have been studied in all age categories.
Concentrations of air pollutants and morbidity data were summarized by daily mean, median, maximum, minimum, standard deviation and inter quartile interval. In addition, for each pollutant we calculated the exceeding standard ratio (ESR). This ratio is defined as the number of days when the daily concentration of the pollutant is above the standard limit value to the total number of days (731 days) of the period study. Based on Moroccan National Ambient Air Quality Standards the standards limit values are 125 µg/m3 for SO2, 50 µg/m3 for NO2, 110 µg/m3 for O3 and 50 µg/m3 for PM10.
To analyze the association between daily concentrations of air pollutants and morbidity data the generalized additive models (GAMs) with Poisson regression have been used [30]–[32]. In this model the log mean morbidity was modeled as a sum of terms representing the covariates. Confounding factors, meteorological variables and time, were modeled in a flexible manner as nonlinear smooth functions of time and air pollutants were modeled in a linear manner. Recently, Armstrong and colleagues proposed the conditional Poisson model in which primary confounder control is by stratifying time by month and day-of-week, a typical case crossover approach. The conditional Poisson model is a multinomial model [33]:
where the confounder control time strata (month and day-of-week) are denoted s = 1, ..., S. Yi is the count of morbidity outcome at day “i”. xi is the air pollutants, temperature and relative humidity vector. β is the vector of parameter being estimated by conditioning on the sum of events Y.,s = ΣiYi,s in each stratum (more details in [33]). A plausible model was chosen using as a guide Akaike's information criterion (AIC) which is an estimate of expected prediction error [34].
For each model we tested the association of the morbidity variables and the concentrations of the air pollutants for the same day (lag0) up to 4 lag days (lag4). From these four lag days models the model that yielded the smallest p-value was chosen. All calculations were performed with the R software (R version 4.0.3 (2020-10-10)) using the “gnm” package.
| SO2 | NO2 | O3 | PM10 | |
| Mean | 209.4 | 61 | 113.2 | 75.1 |
| Standard deviation | 218.4 | 38.7 | 147.6 | 52.4 |
| Interquartile range | 298.7 | 46 | 80 | 33 |
| Minimum | 5.8 | 0 | 14 | 7 |
| Lower quartile | 33.3 | 32 | 32 | 50 |
| Median | 126 | 50 | 67 | 64.7 |
| Uper quartile | 332 | 78 | 112 | 83 |
| Maximum | 904 | 251 | 812 | 673 |
| ESR* (%) | 23.8 | 2.7 | 15.3 | 15.1 |
Note: *ESR: Exceeding Standard Ratio.
DownLoad:
CSV
Descriptive analysis showed that the mean daily concentrations of SO2, NO2, O3 and PM10 in GC were 209.4 µg/m3, 61 µg/m3, 113.2 µg/m3 and 75.1 µg/m3, respectively (Table 1). According to the interquartile range and the standard deviation values, we observed that SO2 had the highly daily variation in comparison to the three other pollutants. In contrast, NO2 had low fluctuations during the period study. The daily variations of the four air pollutants are shown in Figure 2. Level concentrations of SO2 increased in 2012 and decreased in 2013. NO2 observed fluctuations during the period study. Although NO2 had fluctuations during the period study, it had the low ESR (2.7%). The highest ESR value was obtained for SO2 (23.8%) followed by O3 (15.3%) and PM10 (15.1%). We concluded that the SO2 pollution is more serious than the other pollutants.
In children under 5 years, a total of 218,181 consultations were recorded (Table 2). The UARI accounted for 19.4% followed by sore throat with 14.0% and LARI (11.4%). The daily average of the three variables was 68 (SD = 47.8), 49 (SD = 31.2) and 40 (SD = 30.6), respectively (Table 3). Pneumonia come in fourth position with 8.0% followed by earaches (5.9%) with daily averages of 28 (SD = 21.0) and 21 (SD = 14.5), respectively. For asthma we recorded 2 cases on average per day. The rate of VSD and SPN did not exceed 1%. For the 8 variables studied, we observed that the morbidity rate is higher in children between 24 months and 59 months (Table 2). We observed that antibiotic prescriptions correspond to a ratio of 0.3; i.e; an antibiotic prescription for one per 3 consultations. Bronchodilators are less prescribed than antibiotics (Table 2).
| TC | UARI | ST | LARI | PN | Earaches | ASTHMA | SVD | SPN | Antibiotic Prescriptions | Bronchodilator Prescriptions | |
| 0–11 months | 68,418 (31%) | 8,653 (20%) | 4,269 (14%) | 7,686 (31%) | 5,693 (32%) | 3,528 (28%) | 313 (22%) | 203 (27%) | 247 (38%) | 15,646 (23%) | 449 (26%) |
| 12–23 months | 62,988 (29%) | 13,537 (32%) | 9,475 (31%) | 7,716 (31%) | 4,985 (29%) | 4,024 (31%) | 356 (26%) | 247 (33%) | 198 (31%) | 20,468 (31%) | 456 (27%) |
| 24–59 months | 86,775 (40%) | 20,079 (48%) | 16,889 (55%) | 9,535 (38%) | 6,807 (39%) | 5,257 (41%) | 725 (52%) | 306 (40%) | 204 (31%) | 30,701 (46%) | 798 (47%) |
| Total | 218,181 | 42,269 | 30,633 | 24,937 | 17,485 | 12,809 | 1394 | 756 | 649 | 66,815 | 1,703 |
| % of morbidity | 19.4% | 14.0% | 11.4% | 8.0% | 5.9% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.3% | |||
Note: TC: Total Consultations, UARI: Upper Acute Respiratory Infection, ST: Sore Throat, LARI: Lower Acute Respiratory Disease, PN: Pneumonia, SVD: Serious Disease, SPN: Serious Pneumonia.
DownLoad:
CSV
| TC | UARI | ST | LARI | PN | Earaches | Asthma | SVD | SPN | Antibiotic Prescriptions | Bronchodilator Prescriptions | |
| Mean | 351 | 68 | 49 | 40 | 28 | 21 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 108 | 3 |
| Standard deviation | 188.3 | 47.8 | 31.2 | 30.6 | 21.0 | 14.5 | 2.9 | 14.3 | 1.9 | 65.6 | 3.7 |
| Interquartile range | 221 | 56 | 37 | 37 | 29 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 89 | 4 |
| Minimum | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lower quartile | 255 | 35 | 29 | 18 | 12 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0 |
| Median | 387 | 65 | 49 | 35 | 25 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 113 | 1 |
| Upper quartile | 476 | 91 | 66 | 55 | 41 | 29 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 149 | 4 |
| Maximum | 1022 | 362 | 184 | 176 | 107 | 82 | 20 | 351 | 16 | 333 | 24 |
Note: TC: Total Consultations, UARI: Upper Acute Respiratory Infection, ST: Sore Throat, LARI: Lower Acute Respiratory Disease, PN: Pneumonia, SVD: Serious Disease, SPN: Serious Pneumonia.
DownLoad:
CSV
| TC | RC | ARI | Asthma | Conjunctivitis | COPD | Antibiotic Prescriptions | Bronchodilator Prescriptions | |
| 5–14 years | 134,325 (20%) | 27,648 (28%) | 19,637 (30%) | 1,598 (14%) | 2,957 (36%) | 114 (14%) | 30,568 (27%) | 1,439(15%) |
| 15–50 years | 348,043 (50%) | 44,518 (45%) | 29,649 (45%) | 6,344 (57%) | 3,603 (43%) | 342 (43%) | 52,179 (46%) | 5,212 (56%) |
| >50 years | 205,658 (30%) | 26,161 (27%) | 16,694 (25%) | 3,234 (29%) | 1,753 (21%) | 346 (43%) | 30,457 (27%) | 2,709 (29%) |
| Total | 688,026 | 98,327 | 65,980 | 11,176 | 8,313 | 802 | 113,204 | 9,360 |
| % Of morbidity | 14.0% | 10.0% | 2.0% | 1.0% | 0.12% | |||
Note: TC: Total Consultations, RC: Respiratory Consultations, ARI: Acute Respiratory Infection, COPD: Chronic Obstruction Pneumonia Disease.
DownLoad:
CSV
| TC | RC | ARI | Asthma | Conjunctivitis | COPD | Antibiotic Prescriptions | Bronchodilator Prescriptions | |
| Mean | 1117 | 160 | 107 | 18 | 13 | 1 | 184 | 15 |
| Standard deviation | 563.3 | 109.5 | 86.6 | 13.3 | 9.1 | 1.9 | 113.1 | 11.6 |
| Interquartile range | 668 | 157.3 | 116 | 16 | 12 | 2 | 161.3 | 14 |
| Minimum | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lower quartile | 834.3 | 78.8 | 41 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 99.8 | 7 |
| Median | 1303.5 | 149.5 | 90.5 | 18 | 13 | 1 | 198 | 14 |
| Upper quartile | 1502.3 | 236 | 157 | 25 | 19 | 2 | 261 | 21 |
| Maximum | 2261 | 537 | 545 | 128 | 54 | 16 | 469 | 67 |
Note: TC: Total Consultations, RC: Respiratory Consultations, ARI: Acute Respiratory Infection, COPD: Chronic Obstruction Pneumonia Disease.
DownLoad:
CSV
In children over 5 years and adults, a total of 688,026 consultations were recorded for the two years of the study (Table 4 and Table 5). 14% of all consultations were for respiratory causes (98,327) and 10% for acute respiratory disease with daily averages of 160 (SD = 109.5) and 107 (SD = 86.6), respectively. The average daily asthma was 18 (SD = 13.3) and the conjunctivitis 13 (SD = 9.1) with a total number of 11,176 and 8,313, respectively. The highest morbidity rate was observed for the age group between 15 and 50 years. Regarding antibiotic prescriptions, we found that an antibiotic is prescribed for one consultation on 6. As for the sub-group of the children under 5 years, bronchodilators are prescribed fewer antibiotics.
Five lag days labeled lag0 (the current day), lag1 (one day after), lag2 (two days after), lag3 (three days after) and lag4 (four days after) were studied. The relative risks obtained for each pollutant and each day lag were shown in Figure 3 for children under 5 years and in Figure 4 for children over 5 years and adults.
In children under 5 years, we observed a significant association between the 9 studied morbidity variables and exposition to NO2 for the current day (except asthma) and the next day (lag1, except bronchodilator prescriptions). This association decreased for lag2 and lag3. An increase of 10 µg/m3 in NO2 induced an increase of 12% of asthma cases; 3% of UARIs, pneumonia and sore throat; and 2% of LARIs in the second day after exposition. In the current day of exposition to NO2, bronchodilator and antibiotic prescriptions were increased by 19% and 3%, respectively; and decreased for the days after. For PM10, no association was observed for the second day and all morbidity variables. However, for the current day an increase of 10 µg/m3 would lead to 2% increase of LARIs, 2% of PNs, 2% of earaches and 1% of STs. This increase was accompanied with 4% and 1% increase in bronchodilator and antibiotic prescriptions, respectively. Regarding SO2, for each day the exposition to the pollutant showed similar effect on morbidity in children under 5. An increase of 10 µg/m3 of SO2 was accompanied with 1% to 2% of morbidity. The pollutant O3 showed significant effect on morbidity of all morbidity variables, specifically in the first day after exposition (lag1) in children under 5 years. Figure 3 showed that the relative risks for morbidity were gradually weak for lag3 and lag4. Bronchodilator prescriptions were not associated to exposition to O3.
In children over 5 years and adults, results showed that SO2 was significantly associated with acute respiratory infections (RR of 1.01), conjunctivitis (RR of 1.01), COPD (RR of 1.02 for lag0; and 1.01 for lag1), and asthma (RR of 1.02 for lag1 and 1.01 for lag2 and lag3) (Figure 4). The increase of morbidity due to SO2 exposition was accompanied to 1–2% of antibiotics and bronchodilators prescriptions. Asthma is also associated with pollutant PM10. An increase of 10 µg/m3 of PM10 can cause an increase of 2% in the number of asthma cases on the day of the exhibition (lag0) and 1% for the next days (lag2 and lag3). PM10 was also associated with respiratory consultations (2%) and ARIs (2%). For drug prescriptions, a significant association was obtained between PM10 and bronchodilators for lag2 (1%); and antibiotics for lag0, lag2 and lag4 with 2% (Figure 4). The impact of NO2 was observed in the first day after exposition (lag1) where an increase of 10 µg/m3 could give an increase of 2% in the number of respiratory consultations and 4% of ARIs. Treatment prescriptions were 2% and 6% for antibiotics and bronchodilator, respectively. As for NO2, the effected of O3 was significant for day lag1, notably for asthma (6%), respiratory consultations (3%) and ARIs (2%) accompanied by 3% and 5% of antibiotic and bronchodilator prescriptions, respectively.
We also studied the relationships between ambient air pollutants (PM10, SO2, NO2 and O3) and emergency department visits (EDVs) for respiratory and cardiac diseases from 2011 to 2013 in Casablanca. Figure 5 showed forest plot for the relative risks estimated using conditional Poisson model for lag0, lag1, lag2, lag3 and lag4 modeling the association between the daily average of the pollutant level and the daily number of EDVs for respiratory diseases (RDs) and cardiac diseases (CDs).
Figure 5 shows that exposure to ozone pollutant contributed to the number of emergency department visits for respiratory causes with 1% (for lag0, lag2 and lag3) and 2% for lag4. A significant effect of O3 on emergency department visits due to cardio-vascular disease was only observed for lag1 (2%). For NO2, exposure on the current day did not affecte immediately the number of EDVs due to cardio-vascular diseases. However, an increase of 10 µg/m3 of NO2 level induced significantly an increase of these visits three days after exposition (9%). EDVs due to respiratory diseases increased by 3% in lag0 and decreased on days after. Regarding SO2, the relative risk for EDVs due to cardiac and respiratory diseases remained constant (1%) for all days. Regarding PM10, the impact on EDVs due to respiratory diseases was the same as that of SO2. PM10 could contribute significantly with 2% to the number of EDVs due to cardiac diseases for lag0 and lag1.
To assess the effect of air pollution on the Casablanca population morbidity, we studied the association of daily concentrations of the O3, NO2, SO2 and PM10 pollutants and daily number of both consultations due to respiratory diseases and emergency department visits due to respiratory and cardiac diseases. Association between each pollutant and each morbidity variable (UARI, LARI, PN, SPN, asthma, ST, earaches, VSD, RC, ARD, conjunctivitis, COPD, respiratory disease EDVs and cardiac disease EDVs) and antibiotic and bronchodilator prescriptions was studied using a conditional Poisson. Our results showed that one could predict an increase in the number of EDVs due to cardiac diseases of 2% to 9%, of 1%, of 1% to 2% and of 1% to 2% caused by an increase of 10 µg/m3 in the NO2, SO2, PM10 and O3 pollutant concentrations, respectively. The number of EDVs due to respiratory diseases was also affected by an increase of the air pollutants.
Particulate matters are mainly discharged from various automobiles and harbor a more complex impact on asthmatic airways, since their deposition in the airways directly elicited airway inflammation, mucosal edema and cytotoxicity [35]. In a recent review, Jang et al. reported that PM10 exposure significantly increased hospital admissions for all conditions studied, including asthma, allergic rhinitis, and upper and lower respiratory tract diseases [36]. Regarding results we obtained for PM10, it was found associated with increasing emergency hospital admissions for respiratory and cardiac diseases and consultations for asthma (12% in children under 5 years and 2% in children above 5 years and adults, respectively). Similar results were obtained by Hajat et al. [37]. PM10 was found to increment the relative risk of the number of pneumonia consultations (RR = 1.02), COPD (RR = 1.03 for lag3) and the emergency department visits (RR = 1.01 to 1.02). A study conducted by Zanobetti et al. in 10 US cities indicated that a daily 10 µg/m3 increase of PM10 resulted in a 2.5% increase in COPD, a 1.9% increase in pneumonia, and a 1.2% increase in cardiovascular diseases [38]. A recent study showed that a 10 µg/m3 increase in the PM10 concentration is associated with adverse health effects to the human respiratory system [39].
There is evidence that NO2 contributes to the public health burden of air pollution. In a recent review, Mills et al. have established that there are significant associations between exposure to NO2 and mortality and hospital admissions for a range of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases in different age groups [16]. In our study, NO2 was significantly associated to lower acute respiratory infection in children under 5 years with an increase of 2% (lag2) corresponding to an increase of 10 µg/m3 of the air pollutant. The same result has been reported previously [40]. Also, NO2 induced a change of 2–4% of pneumonia consultations and 3% of sore throat. There was moderate evidence that exposure to an annual mean below 40 µg/m3 of NO2 is associated with adverse health effects in susceptible populations as four studies were conducted among children and adolescents [41]–[44]. We also found that NO2 had significantly effect at lag1 (one day after exposure to the pollutant) than at lag0. This result was also observed in the eastern china population study conducted by Liu et al. [45]. More recently, Pannullo et al. demonstrated association between NO2 and respiratory hospital admissions [46].
Sulfur dioxide is a respiratory irritant and bronchoconstrictor, and has been associated with cardiovascular abnormalities [47],[48]. Relative to our finding, in the current day of exposure to SO2, the pollutant immediately induced a relative risk of 1% of EDVs due to respiratory and cardiac diseases. This could be explained by the fact that inhalation of SO2 leads to rapid onset bronchoconstriction [49]. Yet, SO2 was associated to 2% to 2% of bronchodilator prescriptions in children under 5 years and in children above 5 years and adults. We found that SO2 caused an increase in the consultation number for asthma of 2% in children under 5 years and in children above 5 years and adults. Recently, studies revealed that SO2 had physiological effects on the cardiovascular system, including vasorelaxation and cardiac function regulation [50]. Findings from studies continue to provide additional support to epidemiologic evidence of an association between ambient SO2 concentration and various measures of respiratory morbidity in the general population [51]. Although others findings suggested that endogenous SO2 was a novel gasotransmitter in the cardiovascular system and provided a new therapy target for cardiovascular diseases [52].
Inhalation of ozone injures the airway and causes inflammation. The strength of evidence for a causal relationship between short-term and long-term exposure to ozone and CV effects was categorized by experts as “below equipoise” [53],[54]. Elevated ambient ozone concentrations have been epidemiologically associated with nasal airway inflammation [55],[56]. In children, Hwang et al. provided evidence that long-term exposure to O3 may have a detrimental effect on the development of lung function [57]. In general population, Pride et al. demonstrated an association of increasing ground-level ozone with an increase in clinic visits for adverse respiratory-related effects in the following day (lag day 1) [58]. Our results showed that an increase of 10 µg/m3 of O3 could cause at lag1 in children under 5 years an increase of 2% of pneumonia, 3% of sore throat, 4% of earaches and 4% of antibiotic prescriptions.
Emerging epidemiological and experimental studies are now suggesting a relationship between air pollution and COVID-19-related outcomes [20]–[26],[59]–[64]. According to specific mechanisms, several studies suggested that air pollution might play a role in COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality. Findings from studies in Italian regions and provinces suggest that if weather conditions are stable and concentrations of PM are high, the virus could create clusters with PM [62]. Studies from Germany, Spain, UK, France, Italy and China reported a positive association between PM concentrations and the number of SARS-CoV-2 infected cases, while a negative association was found for O3 [21]. In a study, covering Italy, Spain, Germany and France, NO2 was found to be related to COVID-19 mortality that revealed 83% of COVID-19 fatalities occurred in the regions with the highest NO2 levels [63]. Regarding the role of long-term exposure to air pollution, an Italian study reported that mean levels of NO2, O3, and PM during the past 4 years, were correlated with the number of COVID-19 cases [64].
This study highlights that small reduction in the level of risk factors may yield a great benefit for the health of the Great Casablanca population. A reflection on the opportunities to develop feasible actions are needed in order to adopt the more stringent WHO targets. Decision-makers should prioritize the development and implementation of interventions in order to enhance the monitoring of ambient air quality at local level and sensitize and educate citizens to raise awareness about the impact of air pollution on health. Improving air quality would improve peoples' health quality of life, reduce absenteeism, increase the work productivity and reduce the public health problems.
However, there are several limitations to this study that may influence the interpretation of the results. Regarding the ambient exposure of the population, our results are affected by the ecological fallacy because of using ecological data on exposure to pollutants. Equally, assuming independence of the effects of pollutants could overestimate our results. One of the strengths of this study is its inclusion of a large and socio-demographically diverse population, which minimizes the likelihood of selection bias and may enhance the generality. Also, there is need for more detailed studies to evaluate the relationship between air pollution, atmospheric stability/turbulence and the spread of COVID-19 in Casablanca.
| [1] |
Lai HK, Tsang H, Wong CM (2013) Meta-analysis of adverse health effects due to air pollution in Chinese populations. BMC Public Health 13: 360. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-360
|
| [2] |
Kelly FJ, Fussell JC (2015) Air pollution and public health: emerging hazards and improved understanding of risk. Environ Geochem Health 37: 631-649. doi: 10.1007/s10653-015-9720-1
|
| [3] |
Jiang XQ, Mei XD, Feng D (2016) Air pollution and chronic airway diseases: what should people know and do? J Thorac Dis 8: E31-E40. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.08.40
|
| [4] | World Health Organization Burden of disease from air pollution (2014) .Available from: https://www.who.int/phe/health_topics/outdoorair/databases/FINAL_HAP_AAP_BoD_24March2014.pdf. |
| [5] |
Song Q, Christiani DC, Wang XR, et al. (2014) The global contribution of outdoor air pollution to the incidence, prevalence, mortality and hospital admission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11: 11822-11832. doi: 10.3390/ijerph111111822
|
| [6] |
Männistö T, Mendola P, Laughon Grantz K, et al. (2015) Acute and recent air pollution exposure and cardiovascular events at labour and delivery. Heart 101: 1491-1498. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-307366
|
| [7] |
Stevanović I, Jovasević-Stojanović M, Stosić JJ (2016) Association between ambient air pollution, meteorological conditions and exacerbations of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adult citizens of the town of Smederevo. Vojnosanit Pregl 73: 152-158. doi: 10.2298/VSP141111026S
|
| [8] |
Hoek G, Krishnan RM, Beelen R, et al. (2013) Long-term air pollution exposure and cardio-respiratory mortality: a review. Environ Health 12: 43. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-43
|
| [9] |
Pascal M, Corso M, Chanel O, et al. (2013) Assessing the public health impacts of urban air pollution in 25 European cities: results of the Aphekom project. Sci Total Environ 449: 390-400. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.077
|
| [10] | World Health Organization Ambient (outdoor) air quality and health (2018) .Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-health. |
| [11] |
Franklin BA, Brook R, Arden PC (2015) Air pollution and cardiovascular disease. Curr Probl Cardiol 40: 207-238. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2015.01.003
|
| [12] | WHO Burden of disease from Household Air Pollution for 2012 (2014) .Available from: https://www.who.int/phe/health_topics/outdoorair/databases/FINAL_HAP_AAP_BoD_24March2014.pdf. |
| [13] |
Hao Y, Balluz L, Strosnider H, et al. (2015) Ozone, Fine Particulate Matter, and Chronic Lower Respiratory Disease Mortality in the United States. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 192: 337-341. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201410-1852OC
|
| [14] |
Pirozzi C, Sturrock A, Weng HY, et al. (2015) Effect of naturally occurring ozone air pollution episodes on pulmonary oxidative stress and inflammation. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12: 5061-5075. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120505061
|
| [15] |
Petito Boyce C, Goodman JE, Sax SN, et al. (2015) Providing perspective for interpreting cardiovascular mortality risks associated with ozone exposures. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 72: 107-116. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.03.009
|
| [16] |
Mills IC, Atkinson RW, Kang S, et al. (2015) Quantitative systematic review of the associations between short-term exposure to nitrogen dioxide and mortality and hospital admissions. BMJ Open 5: e006946. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006946
|
| [17] |
Chen R, Huang W, Wong CM, et al. (2012) Short-term exposure to sulfur dioxide and daily mortality in 17 Chinese cities: the China air pollution and health effects study (CAPES). Environ Res 118: 101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2012.07.003
|
| [18] | Zhang Y, Wang SG, Ma YX, et al. (2015) Association between Ambient Air Pollution and Hospital Emergency Admissions for Respiratory and Cardiovascular Diseases in Beijing: a Time Series Study. Biomed Environ Sci 28: 352-363. |
| [19] |
Norbäck D, Lu C, Zhang Y, et al. (2019) Sources of indoor particulate matter (PM) and outdoor air pollution in China in relation to asthma, wheeze, rhinitis and eczema among pre-school children: Synergistic effects between antibiotics use and PM10 and second hand smoke. Environ Int 125: 252-260. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.01.036
|
| [20] |
Zhu Y, Xie J, Huang F, et al. (2020) Association between short-term exposure to air pollution and COVID-19 infection: Evidence from China. Sci Total Environ 727: 138704. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138704
|
| [21] | Srivastava A (2020) COVID-19 and air pollution and meteorology-an intricate relationship: A review. Chemosphere 5: 128297. |
| [22] |
Coccia M (2021) The effects of atmospheric stability with low wind speed and of air pollution on the accelerated transmission dynamics of COVID-19. Int J Environ Stud 78: 1-27. doi: 10.1080/00207233.2020.1802937
|
| [23] | Coccia M (2021) Effects of the spread of COVID-19 on public health of polluted cities: results of the first wave for explaining the dejà vu in the second wave of COVID-19 pandemic and epidemics of future vital agents. SSRN Electron J . |
| [24] |
Coccia M (2020) How do low wind speeds and high levels of air pollution support the spread of COVID-19? Atmos Pollut Res 12: 437-445. doi: 10.1016/j.apr.2020.10.002
|
| [25] |
Coccia M (2020) How (Un) sustainable Environments Are Related to the Diffusion of COVID-19: The Relation between Coronavirus Disease 2019, Air Pollution, Wind Resource and Energy. Sustainability 12: 9709. doi: 10.3390/su12229709
|
| [26] |
Coccia M (2020) An index to quantify environmental risk of exposure to future epidemics of the COVID-19 and similar viral agents: Theory and Practice. Environ Res 191: 110155. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110155
|
| [27] |
Khatami A, Ponche JL, Jabry E, et al. (1998) The air quality management of the region of Great Casablanca (Morocco). Part 1: Atmospheric emission inventory for the year 1992. Sci Total Environ 209: 201-216. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(97)00307-0
|
| [28] | International Business Publications (IBP), USA 2017 Morocco country study guide Washington, DC 20043 Available from: http://www.internationalbusiness.infoalbum.com/269-1734684910/IB_Morocco_17.v02.pdf. |
| [29] | Nejjari C, Filleul L, Zidouni N, et al. (2003) Air pollution: a new respiratory risk for cities in low-income countries. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 7: 223-231. |
| [30] | Hastie T, Tibshirani R (1986) Generalized Additive Models. Stat Sci 1: 297-318. |
| [31] |
Peng RD, Dominici F, Louis TA (2006) Model choice in time series studies of air pollution and mortality. J R Stat Soc Ser A 169: 179-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00410.x
|
| [32] |
Dominici F, Peng RD, Bell ML, et al. (2006) Fine particulate air pollution and hospital admission for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. JAMA 295: 1127-1134. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.10.1127
|
| [33] |
Armstrong B, Gasparrini A, Tobias A (2014) Conditional Poisson models: a flexible alternative to conditional logistic case cross-over analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol 14: 122-127. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-122
|
| [34] |
Akaike H (1970) Statistical predictor identification. Ann Inst Statist Math 22: 203-217. doi: 10.1007/BF02506337
|
| [35] |
Li N, Buglak N (2015) Convergence of air pollutant-induced redox-sensitive signals in the dendritic cells contributes to asthma pathogenesis. Toxicol Lett 237: 55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.05.017
|
| [36] |
Jang AS, Jun YJ, Park MK (2016) Effects of air pollutants on upper airway disease. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 16: 13-17. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000235
|
| [37] |
Hajat S, Haines A, Atkinson RW, et al. (2001) Association between air pollution and daily consultations with general practitioners for allergic rhinitis in London, United Kingdom. Am J Epidemiol 153: 704-714. doi: 10.1093/aje/153.7.704
|
| [38] |
Zanobetti A, Schwartz J, Dockery DW (2000) Airborne particles are a risk factor for hospital admissions for heart and lung disease. Environ Health Perspect 108: 1071-1077. doi: 10.1289/ehp.001081071
|
| [39] |
Badyda A, Gayer A, Czechowski PO, et al. (2016) Pulmonary Function and Incidence of Selected Respiratory Diseases Depending on the Exposure to Ambient PM(10). Int J Mol Sci 17: 1954. doi: 10.3390/ijms17111954
|
| [40] |
Hajat S, Haines A, Goubet SA, et al. (1999) Association of air pollution with daily GP consultations for asthma and other lower respiratory conditions in London. Thorax 54: 597-605. doi: 10.1136/thx.54.7.597
|
| [41] |
Rosenlund M, Forastiere F, Porta D, et al. (2009) Traffic-related air pollution in relation to respiratory symptoms, allergic sensitisation and lung function in schoolchildren. Thorax 64: 573-580. doi: 10.1136/thx.2007.094953
|
| [42] |
Barone-Adesi F, Dent JE, Dajnak D, et al. (2015) Long-Term Exposure to Primary Traffic Pollutants and Lung Function in Children: Cross-Sectional Study and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One 10: e0142565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142565
|
| [43] |
Brauer M (2010) How much, how long, what, and where: air pollution exposure assessment for epidemiologic studies of respiratory disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc 7: 111-115. doi: 10.1513/pats.200908-093RM
|
| [44] |
Clark NA, Demers PA, Karr CJ, et al. (2010) Effect of early life exposure to air pollution on development of childhood asthma. Environ Health Perspect 118: 284-290. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0900916
|
| [45] |
Liu P, Wang X, Fan J, et al. (2016) Effects of Air Pollution on Hospital Emergency Room Visits for Respiratory Diseases: Urban-Suburban Differences in Eastern China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13: 341. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13030341
|
| [46] |
Pannullo F, Lee D, Neal L, et al. (2017) Quantifying the impact of current and future concentrations of air pollutants on respiratory disease risk in England. Environ Health 16: 29. doi: 10.1186/s12940-017-0237-1
|
| [47] |
Atkinson RW, Carey IM, Kent AJ, et al. (2013) Long-term exposure to outdoor air pollution and incidence of cardiovascular diseases. Epidemiology 24: 44-53. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318276ccb8
|
| [48] |
Liu L, Kauri LM, Mahmud M, et al. (2014) Exposure to air pollution near a steel plant and effects on cardiovascular physiology: a randomized crossover study. Int J Hyg Environ Health 217: 279-286. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.06.007
|
| [49] |
Atzori L, Bannenberg G, Corriga AM, et al. (1992) Sulfur dioxide-induced bronchoconstriction via ruthenium red-sensitive activation of sensory nerves. Respiration 59: 272-278. doi: 10.1159/000196072
|
| [50] | Chen SS, Tang CS, Jin HF, et al. (2011) Sulfur dioxide acts as a novel endogenous gaseous signaling molecule in the cardiovascular system. Chin Med J 124: 1901-1905. |
| [51] |
Guan WJ, Zheng XY, Chung KF, et al. (2016) Impact of air pollution on the burden of chronic respiratory diseases in China: time for urgent action. Lancet 388: 1939-1951. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31597-5
|
| [52] | Huang Y, Tang C, Du J, et al. (2016) Endogenous Sulfur Dioxide: A New Member of Gasotransmitter Family in the Cardiovascular System. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2016: 8961951. |
| [53] |
Goodman JE, Prueitt RL, Sax SN, et al. (2014) Weight-of-evidence evaluation of short-term ozone exposure and cardiovascular effects. Crit Rev Toxicol 44: 725-790. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2014.937854
|
| [54] |
Prueitt RL, Lynch HN, Zu K, et al. (2014) Weight-of-evidence evaluation of long-term ozone exposure and cardiovascular effects. Crit Rev Toxicol 44: 791-822. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2014.937855
|
| [55] |
Arjomandi M, Wong H, Donde A, et al. (2015) Exposure to medium and high ambient levels of ozone causes adverse systemic inflammatory and cardiac autonomic effects. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 308: H1499. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00849.2014
|
| [56] |
Ong CB, Kumagai K, Brooks PT, et al. (2016) Ozone-Induced Type 2 Immunity in Nasal Airways. Development and Lymphoid Cell Dependence in Mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 54: 331-340. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2015-0165OC
|
| [57] |
Hwang BF, Chen YH, Lin YT, et al. (2015) Relationship between exposure to fine particulates and ozone and reduced lung function in children. Environ Res 137: 382-390. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.01.009
|
| [58] |
Pride KR, Peel JL, Robinson BF, et al. (2015) Association of short-term exposure to ground-level ozone and respiratory outpatient clinic visits in a rural location - Sublette County, Wyoming, 2008–2011. Environ Res 137: 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.10.033
|
| [59] |
Bourdrel T, Annesi-Maesano I, Alahmad B, et al. (2021) The impact of outdoor air pollution on COVID-19: a review of evidence from in vitro, animal, and human studies. Eur Respiratory Rev 30: 200242. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0242-2020
|
| [60] |
Ali N, Islam F (2020) The Effects of Air Pollution on COVID-19 Infection and Mortality - A Review on Recent Evidence. Front Public Health 8: 580057. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.580057
|
| [61] |
Bashir MF, Jiang B, Komal B, et al. (2020) Correlation between environmental pollution indicators and COVID-19 pandemic: a brief study in Californian context. Environ Res 187: 109652. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109652
|
| [62] |
Bianconi V, Bronzo P, Banach M, et al. (2020) Particulate matter pollution and the COVID-19 outbreak: results from Italian regions and provinces. Arch Med Sci 16: 985. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.95336
|
| [63] |
Ogen Y (2020) Assessing nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels as a contributing factor to coronavirus (COVID-19) fatality. Sci Total Environ 726: 138605. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138605
|
| [64] |
Fattorini D, Regoli F (2020) Role of the chronic air pollution levels in the Covid-19 outbreak risk in Italy. Environ Pollut 264: 114732. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114732
|
| 1. | N. AL WACHAMI, M. LOUERDI, Y. IDERDAR, K. BOUMENDIL, M. CHAHBOUNE, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and air pollution: The case of Morocco, 2023, 72, 22147853, 3738, 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.249 | |
| 2. | R. Ruiz-Páez, J. Díaz, J.A. López-Bueno, C. Asensio, M.S. Ascaso, M. Saez, M.Y. Luna, M.A. Barceló, M.A. Navas, C. Linares, Short–term effects of air pollution and noise on emergency hospital admissions in Madrid and economic assessment, 2023, 219, 00139351, 115147, 10.1016/j.envres.2022.115147 | |
| 3. | Elena Grigorieva, Artem Lukyanets, Combined Effect of Hot Weather and Outdoor Air Pollution on Respiratory Health: Literature Review, 2021, 12, 2073-4433, 790, 10.3390/atmos12060790 | |
| 4. | Wei Tang, Lixia Sun, Jie Wang, Kaijie Li, Shuhan Liu, Mingwei Wang, Yongran Cheng, Lili Dai, Exploring Associations Between Short-Term Air Pollution and Daily Outpatient Visits for Allergic Rhinitis, 2023, Volume 16, 1179-1594, 1455, 10.2147/RMHP.S416365 | |
| 5. | Imane Sekmoudi, Meryem Tanarhte, Houria Bouzghiba, Kenza Khomsi, Laila Idrissi, Mohamed El jarmouni, Gábor Géczi, Systematic Review of Air Pollution in Morocco: Status, Impacts, and Future Directions, 2024, 2366-7486, 10.1002/adsu.202400006 | |
| 6. | Fatim Sannoh, Haider A. Khwaja, Zafar Fatmi, Nadeem A. Rizvi, Aftab Turabi, Mirza M. Hussain, Azhar Siddique, David O. Carpenter, Gaseous pollutants linked to pulmonary diseases: East meets West, 2024, 1873-9318, 10.1007/s11869-024-01608-0 | |
| 7. | Godfred Safo-Adu, Francis Attiogbe, Ismaila Emahi, Francis Gorman Ofosu, Outdoor and indoor particle air pollution and its health consequences in African cities: New evidence and an exhortation, 2023, 9, 2765-8511, 10.1080/27658511.2023.2265729 | |
| 8. | Abdou Safari Kagabo, Bonfils Safari, Yao Télesphore Brou, Jimmy Gasore, Bethwel Kipkoech Mutai, Assessing the impact of intense urbanization, ambient air pollution and temperature on hospital visits for respiratory diseases in Rwanda, 2024, 1873-9318, 10.1007/s11869-024-01672-6 |
Chakib Nejjari, Abdelghafour Marfak, Ahmed Rguig, Abderrahmane Maaroufi, Ihssane El Marouani, Abderrafii El Haloui, Bouchra El Johra, Rachid Ouahabi, Rachid Moulki, Amina Idrissi Azami, Youness El Achhab. Ambient air pollution and emergency department visits among children and adults in Casablanca, Morocco[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2021, 8(2): 285-302. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021022
| SO2 | NO2 | O3 | PM10 | |
| Mean | 209.4 | 61 | 113.2 | 75.1 |
| Standard deviation | 218.4 | 38.7 | 147.6 | 52.4 |
| Interquartile range | 298.7 | 46 | 80 | 33 |
| Minimum | 5.8 | 0 | 14 | 7 |
| Lower quartile | 33.3 | 32 | 32 | 50 |
| Median | 126 | 50 | 67 | 64.7 |
| Uper quartile | 332 | 78 | 112 | 83 |
| Maximum | 904 | 251 | 812 | 673 |
| ESR* (%) | 23.8 | 2.7 | 15.3 | 15.1 |
Note: *ESR: Exceeding Standard Ratio.
DownLoad:
CSV
| TC | UARI | ST | LARI | PN | Earaches | ASTHMA | SVD | SPN | Antibiotic Prescriptions | Bronchodilator Prescriptions | |
| 0–11 months | 68,418 (31%) | 8,653 (20%) | 4,269 (14%) | 7,686 (31%) | 5,693 (32%) | 3,528 (28%) | 313 (22%) | 203 (27%) | 247 (38%) | 15,646 (23%) | 449 (26%) |
| 12–23 months | 62,988 (29%) | 13,537 (32%) | 9,475 (31%) | 7,716 (31%) | 4,985 (29%) | 4,024 (31%) | 356 (26%) | 247 (33%) | 198 (31%) | 20,468 (31%) | 456 (27%) |
| 24–59 months | 86,775 (40%) | 20,079 (48%) | 16,889 (55%) | 9,535 (38%) | 6,807 (39%) | 5,257 (41%) | 725 (52%) | 306 (40%) | 204 (31%) | 30,701 (46%) | 798 (47%) |
| Total | 218,181 | 42,269 | 30,633 | 24,937 | 17,485 | 12,809 | 1394 | 756 | 649 | 66,815 | 1,703 |
| % of morbidity | 19.4% | 14.0% | 11.4% | 8.0% | 5.9% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.3% | |||
Note: TC: Total Consultations, UARI: Upper Acute Respiratory Infection, ST: Sore Throat, LARI: Lower Acute Respiratory Disease, PN: Pneumonia, SVD: Serious Disease, SPN: Serious Pneumonia.
DownLoad:
CSV
| TC | UARI | ST | LARI | PN | Earaches | Asthma | SVD | SPN | Antibiotic Prescriptions | Bronchodilator Prescriptions | |
| Mean | 351 | 68 | 49 | 40 | 28 | 21 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 108 | 3 |
| Standard deviation | 188.3 | 47.8 | 31.2 | 30.6 | 21.0 | 14.5 | 2.9 | 14.3 | 1.9 | 65.6 | 3.7 |
| Interquartile range | 221 | 56 | 37 | 37 | 29 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 89 | 4 |
| Minimum | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lower quartile | 255 | 35 | 29 | 18 | 12 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0 |
| Median | 387 | 65 | 49 | 35 | 25 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 113 | 1 |
| Upper quartile | 476 | 91 | 66 | 55 | 41 | 29 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 149 | 4 |
| Maximum | 1022 | 362 | 184 | 176 | 107 | 82 | 20 | 351 | 16 | 333 | 24 |
Note: TC: Total Consultations, UARI: Upper Acute Respiratory Infection, ST: Sore Throat, LARI: Lower Acute Respiratory Disease, PN: Pneumonia, SVD: Serious Disease, SPN: Serious Pneumonia.
DownLoad:
CSV
| TC | RC | ARI | Asthma | Conjunctivitis | COPD | Antibiotic Prescriptions | Bronchodilator Prescriptions | |
| 5–14 years | 134,325 (20%) | 27,648 (28%) | 19,637 (30%) | 1,598 (14%) | 2,957 (36%) | 114 (14%) | 30,568 (27%) | 1,439(15%) |
| 15–50 years | 348,043 (50%) | 44,518 (45%) | 29,649 (45%) | 6,344 (57%) | 3,603 (43%) | 342 (43%) | 52,179 (46%) | 5,212 (56%) |
| >50 years | 205,658 (30%) | 26,161 (27%) | 16,694 (25%) | 3,234 (29%) | 1,753 (21%) | 346 (43%) | 30,457 (27%) | 2,709 (29%) |
| Total | 688,026 | 98,327 | 65,980 | 11,176 | 8,313 | 802 | 113,204 | 9,360 |
| % Of morbidity | 14.0% | 10.0% | 2.0% | 1.0% | 0.12% | |||
Note: TC: Total Consultations, RC: Respiratory Consultations, ARI: Acute Respiratory Infection, COPD: Chronic Obstruction Pneumonia Disease.
DownLoad:
CSV
| TC | RC | ARI | Asthma | Conjunctivitis | COPD | Antibiotic Prescriptions | Bronchodilator Prescriptions | |
| Mean | 1117 | 160 | 107 | 18 | 13 | 1 | 184 | 15 |
| Standard deviation | 563.3 | 109.5 | 86.6 | 13.3 | 9.1 | 1.9 | 113.1 | 11.6 |
| Interquartile range | 668 | 157.3 | 116 | 16 | 12 | 2 | 161.3 | 14 |
| Minimum | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lower quartile | 834.3 | 78.8 | 41 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 99.8 | 7 |
| Median | 1303.5 | 149.5 | 90.5 | 18 | 13 | 1 | 198 | 14 |
| Upper quartile | 1502.3 | 236 | 157 | 25 | 19 | 2 | 261 | 21 |
| Maximum | 2261 | 537 | 545 | 128 | 54 | 16 | 469 | 67 |
Note: TC: Total Consultations, RC: Respiratory Consultations, ARI: Acute Respiratory Infection, COPD: Chronic Obstruction Pneumonia Disease.
DownLoad:
CSV
| SO2 | NO2 | O3 | PM10 | |
| Mean | 209.4 | 61 | 113.2 | 75.1 |
| Standard deviation | 218.4 | 38.7 | 147.6 | 52.4 |
| Interquartile range | 298.7 | 46 | 80 | 33 |
| Minimum | 5.8 | 0 | 14 | 7 |
| Lower quartile | 33.3 | 32 | 32 | 50 |
| Median | 126 | 50 | 67 | 64.7 |
| Uper quartile | 332 | 78 | 112 | 83 |
| Maximum | 904 | 251 | 812 | 673 |
| ESR* (%) | 23.8 | 2.7 | 15.3 | 15.1 |
| TC | UARI | ST | LARI | PN | Earaches | ASTHMA | SVD | SPN | Antibiotic Prescriptions | Bronchodilator Prescriptions | |
| 0–11 months | 68,418 (31%) | 8,653 (20%) | 4,269 (14%) | 7,686 (31%) | 5,693 (32%) | 3,528 (28%) | 313 (22%) | 203 (27%) | 247 (38%) | 15,646 (23%) | 449 (26%) |
| 12–23 months | 62,988 (29%) | 13,537 (32%) | 9,475 (31%) | 7,716 (31%) | 4,985 (29%) | 4,024 (31%) | 356 (26%) | 247 (33%) | 198 (31%) | 20,468 (31%) | 456 (27%) |
| 24–59 months | 86,775 (40%) | 20,079 (48%) | 16,889 (55%) | 9,535 (38%) | 6,807 (39%) | 5,257 (41%) | 725 (52%) | 306 (40%) | 204 (31%) | 30,701 (46%) | 798 (47%) |
| Total | 218,181 | 42,269 | 30,633 | 24,937 | 17,485 | 12,809 | 1394 | 756 | 649 | 66,815 | 1,703 |
| % of morbidity | 19.4% | 14.0% | 11.4% | 8.0% | 5.9% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.3% | |||
| TC | UARI | ST | LARI | PN | Earaches | Asthma | SVD | SPN | Antibiotic Prescriptions | Bronchodilator Prescriptions | |
| Mean | 351 | 68 | 49 | 40 | 28 | 21 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 108 | 3 |
| Standard deviation | 188.3 | 47.8 | 31.2 | 30.6 | 21.0 | 14.5 | 2.9 | 14.3 | 1.9 | 65.6 | 3.7 |
| Interquartile range | 221 | 56 | 37 | 37 | 29 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 89 | 4 |
| Minimum | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lower quartile | 255 | 35 | 29 | 18 | 12 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0 |
| Median | 387 | 65 | 49 | 35 | 25 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 113 | 1 |
| Upper quartile | 476 | 91 | 66 | 55 | 41 | 29 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 149 | 4 |
| Maximum | 1022 | 362 | 184 | 176 | 107 | 82 | 20 | 351 | 16 | 333 | 24 |
| TC | RC | ARI | Asthma | Conjunctivitis | COPD | Antibiotic Prescriptions | Bronchodilator Prescriptions | |
| 5–14 years | 134,325 (20%) | 27,648 (28%) | 19,637 (30%) | 1,598 (14%) | 2,957 (36%) | 114 (14%) | 30,568 (27%) | 1,439(15%) |
| 15–50 years | 348,043 (50%) | 44,518 (45%) | 29,649 (45%) | 6,344 (57%) | 3,603 (43%) | 342 (43%) | 52,179 (46%) | 5,212 (56%) |
| >50 years | 205,658 (30%) | 26,161 (27%) | 16,694 (25%) | 3,234 (29%) | 1,753 (21%) | 346 (43%) | 30,457 (27%) | 2,709 (29%) |
| Total | 688,026 | 98,327 | 65,980 | 11,176 | 8,313 | 802 | 113,204 | 9,360 |
| % Of morbidity | 14.0% | 10.0% | 2.0% | 1.0% | 0.12% | |||
| TC | RC | ARI | Asthma | Conjunctivitis | COPD | Antibiotic Prescriptions | Bronchodilator Prescriptions | |
| Mean | 1117 | 160 | 107 | 18 | 13 | 1 | 184 | 15 |
| Standard deviation | 563.3 | 109.5 | 86.6 | 13.3 | 9.1 | 1.9 | 113.1 | 11.6 |
| Interquartile range | 668 | 157.3 | 116 | 16 | 12 | 2 | 161.3 | 14 |
| Minimum | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lower quartile | 834.3 | 78.8 | 41 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 99.8 | 7 |
| Median | 1303.5 | 149.5 | 90.5 | 18 | 13 | 1 | 198 | 14 |
| Upper quartile | 1502.3 | 236 | 157 | 25 | 19 | 2 | 261 | 21 |
| Maximum | 2261 | 537 | 545 | 128 | 54 | 16 | 469 | 67 |
