Research article

Burnout among nurses working in the primary health care centers in Saudi Arabia, a multicenter study

  • Received: 13 August 2020 Accepted: 02 November 2020 Published: 05 November 2020
  • Background: Burnout is a common psychosocial phenomenon among nursing. It has been attributed to prolonged exposure to stress in the work place. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and associated factors of burnout among nurses in the primary health care centers in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 200 nurses by using a self-administered questionnaire. Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) was used to measure burnout. Results: Most participants were females (73.0%) and aged ≤35 years (52.0%). About 39% had high emotional exhaustion, 38% had high depersonalization and 85.5% had low personal accomplishment. About 89% (178) scored high at least on one subscale of burnout. Burnout was associated with age, educational level and sources of stress in the workplace. Conclusion: Level of burnout among nurses was high and was associated mainly with stressors in the workplace. Improving work environment and management of stress in the workplace should be a priority to minimize burnout among nurses.

    Citation: Mohammed Adeeb Shahin, Sami Abdo Radman Al-Dubai, Duoaa Seddiq Abdoh, Abdullah Saud Alahmadi, Ahmed Khalid Ali, Tamer Hifnawy. Burnout among nurses working in the primary health care centers in Saudi Arabia, a multicenter study[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2020, 7(4): 844-853. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020065

    Related Papers:

    [1] Thiresia Sikioti, Afroditi Zartaloudi, Despoina Pappa, Polyxeni Mangoulia, Evangelos C. Fradelos, Freideriki Eleni Kourti, Ioannis Koutelekos, Evangelos Dousis, Nikoletta Margari, Areti Stavropoulou, Eleni Evangelou, Chrysoula Dafogianni . Stress and burnout among Greek critical care nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. AIMS Public Health, 2023, 10(4): 755-774. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023051
    [2] Maryanna Klatt, Jacqueline Caputo, Julia Tripodo, Nimisha Panabakam, Slate Bretz, Yulia Mulugeta, Beth Steinberg . A highly effective mindfulness intervention for burnout prevention and resiliency building in nurses. AIMS Public Health, 2025, 12(1): 91-105. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2025007
    [3] Carol Nash . The Health Narratives Research Group (HeNReG): A self-direction process offered to help decrease burnout in public health nurse practitioners. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(1): 176-208. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024009
    [4] Teresa Galanti, Michela Cortini, Giuseppe Filippo Giudice, Salvatore Zappalà, Ferdinando Toscano . Safeguarding nurses' mental health: The critical role of psychosocial safety climate in mitigating relational stressors and exhaustion. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(3): 905-917. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024046
    [5] Aikaterini Toska, Sofia Ralli, Evangelos C. Fradelos, Ioanna Dimitriadou, Anastasios Christakis, Viktor Vus, Maria Saridi . Evaluation of burnout levels among healthcare staff in anesthesiology departments in Greece - Is there a connection with anxiety and depression?. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(2): 543-556. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024027
    [6] Wedad Saeed Alqahtani, Nawaf Abdulrahman Almufareh, Dalia Mostafa Domiaty, Gadah Albasher, Manal Abduallah Alduwish, Huda Alkhalaf, Bader Almuzzaini, Salma Sanhaat AL-marshidy, Rgya Alfraihi, Abdelbaset Mohamed Elasbali, Hussain Gadelkarim Ahmed, Bassam Ahmed Almutlaq . Epidemiology of cancer in Saudi Arabia thru 2010–2019: a systematic review with constrained meta-analysis
    . AIMS Public Health, 2020, 7(3): 679-696. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020053
    [7] Vasiliki Georgousopoulou, Panagiota Pervanidou, Pantelis Perdikaris, Efrosyni Vlachioti, Vaia Zagana, Georgios Kourtis, Ioanna Pavlopoulou, Vasiliki Matziou . Covid-19 pandemic? Mental health implications among nurses and Proposed interventions. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(1): 273-293. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024014
    [8] Vasileios Tzenetidis, Aristomenis Kotsakis, Mary Gouva, Konstantinos Tsaras, Maria Malliarou . Examining psychosocial risks and their impact on nurses' safety attitudes and medication error rates: A cross-sectional study. AIMS Public Health, 2025, 12(2): 378-380. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2025022
    [9] Christos Sikaras, Ioannis Ilias, Athanasios Tselebis, Argyro Pachi, Sofia Zyga, Maria Tsironi, Andrea Paola Rojas Gil, Aspasia Panagiotou . Nursing staff fatigue and burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic in Greece. AIMS Public Health, 2022, 9(1): 94-105. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2022008
    [10] Petros Galanis, Ioannis Moisoglou, Aglaia Katsiroumpa, Panayota Sourtzi . Impact of workplace bullying on job burnout and turnover intention among nursing staff in Greece: Evidence after the COVID-19 pandemic. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(2): 614-627. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024031
  • Background: Burnout is a common psychosocial phenomenon among nursing. It has been attributed to prolonged exposure to stress in the work place. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and associated factors of burnout among nurses in the primary health care centers in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 200 nurses by using a self-administered questionnaire. Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) was used to measure burnout. Results: Most participants were females (73.0%) and aged ≤35 years (52.0%). About 39% had high emotional exhaustion, 38% had high depersonalization and 85.5% had low personal accomplishment. About 89% (178) scored high at least on one subscale of burnout. Burnout was associated with age, educational level and sources of stress in the workplace. Conclusion: Level of burnout among nurses was high and was associated mainly with stressors in the workplace. Improving work environment and management of stress in the workplace should be a priority to minimize burnout among nurses.


    Burnout is a common psychosocial phenomenon among health care workers. World Health Organization (WHO) defined Burn-out as an occupational phenomenon, “a syndrome conceptualized as resulting from chronic workplace stress that has not been successfully managed” [1]. It is composed of three dimensions: emotional exhaustion (EE), characterized by the sensation of physical and mental overexertion and lack of energy; (ii) depersonalization (DP) characterized by emotional detachment and negative attitudes towards patients and colleagues; and (iii) low personal accomplishment (PA), the degree to which a person perceives doing well on worthwhile tasks [2]. Burnout had negative effects on the employees, by causing different physical and mental problems and also on the organization, by decreasing the quality of care provided for patients and decreasing productivity [3]. A recent meta-analysis study that investigated burnout among nursing found a prevalence of 28% for high emotional exhaustion, 15% for high depersonalization and 31% for low personal accomplishment [4]. Burnout was associated with many sources of stress in the workplace such as work overload, long working hours, lack of resources and conflict with colleagues in addition to sociodemographic characteristics such as gender, age and years of experience. Previous studies in Saudi Arabia have been conducted among nurses in tertiary hospitals but not in the primary health care centers [5][8]. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and associated factors of burnout among nurses working in the primary health care centers in Medina city, Saudi Arabia.

    This observational analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 200 nurses in the primary health care centers (PHC) in Medina city, Saudi Arabia. Al Madinah was divided into four regions, and three PHC centers were selected randomly from each region. All nurses in each center were approached. Those who had an experience of less than one-year were excluded.

    A self-administered questionnaire consisting of three parts was used in this study. The first part included questions on the sociodemographic characteristics. Level of education was categorized into two categories; Bachelor of Science Nursing (BSN; 4 years study and one-year internship) and Diploma in nursing (DN: three years study and 6 months internship).

    The second part assessed burnout by using the validated Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) which is the most commonly used tool for assessing burnout. It consists of 22 items which are divided into three subscales: emotional exhaustion, 9 items (the feelings of being emotionally overrun and exhausted by one's work); depersonalization, 5 items (the tendency to view others as objects rather than as feeling persons) and personal accomplishment, 8 items (the degree to which a person perceives doing well on worthwhile tasks). The items are answered in a 7-point scale ranging from 0 (never) to 6 (every day) [2]. The three scores are calculated for each respondent. High scores for EE and DP indicated higher levels of burnout, while high scores for PA indicated lower levels of burnout. This instrument was validated in many languages including Arabic language [9]. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the three MBI subscales of the Arabic version were: emotional exhaustion (alpha = 0.88), depersonalization (alpha = 0.78), personal accomplishment (alpha = 0.89) [9] High level of burnout is defined in this study as high score on any of the three subscales of burnout [9],[10]. Sources of stress were assessed by 10 items which were obtained from the literature [10]. These items were headed by the following question: “to which extent dose the following conditions cause stress to you”. Each item was scored from zero (causing no stress) to 4 (causing severe stress) [10].

    Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Directorate of Health in Al-Madinah. Objectives and benefits of the study were explained to the participants. Participants confidentiality and anonymity were assured. Signed consents were obtained from the participants.

    Analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS®) (version 22.0, IBM, Armonk, NY). The 22 items of MBI were summed to obtain the total score of each subscale [2].

    Each subscale was categorized into low, moderate and high according to the recommended cut-off points [9]. Test of normality was performed for each subscale. T-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) test were used to assess the association between burnout subscales and the sociodemographic variables. Pearson Correlation coefficient was used to assess the association between burnout subscales and the sources of stress. To obtain the significant factors associated with each subscale of burnout, multiple linear regression analysis was employed by using “Backward” technique. Multi-collinearity was checked between the independent variables by using the VIF. The accepted level of significance was below 0.05 (p < 0.05).

    Most participants were females (73.0%), aged ≤35 years (52.0%), married (81.0%) and had >10 years of service. Most of them had no administrative work (80.0%), had diploma (75.0%) and had a monthly income of less than 12 thousand Saudi Rial (SAR) (53.0%) (Table 1).

    Table 1.  Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants.
    n %
    Age
     ≤35 104 52.0
     >35 96 48.0
    Gender
     Male 54 27.0
     Female 146 73.0
    Marital status
     Single 30 15.0
     Married 162 81.0
     Divorced/widower 8 4.0
    Educational level
     Diploma 150 75.0
     Bachelor 50 25.0
    Years of service
     5 or less 32 16.0
     6–10 57 28.5
     >10 111 55.5
    Administrative task
     Yes 40 20.0
     No 160 80.0
    Monthly income (SAR)*
     <12000 106 53.0
     ≥12000 94 47.0

    Note: *1 USD = 3.7 SAR.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    About 39% had high EE, 38% had high DP and 85.5% had low PA. Forty-five participants (22.5%) scored high on all the three subscale of burnout and 178 scored high at least on one subscale of burnout (89%) (Table 2). The reliability analysis of the three subscales yielded Cronbach alpha of 0.84 for EE, 0.76 for DP and 0.85 for PA.

    Table 2.  Prevalence of burnout among participants.
    Low n (%) Moderate n (%) High n (%)
    EE 72 (36) 50 (25) 78 (39)
    DP 46 (23) 78 (39) 76 (38)
    PA 171 (85.5) 11 (5.5) 18 (9.0)

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The most important sources of stress were long working hours, work overload, fear of violence and lack of resources (Table 3).

    Table 3.  Sources of stress in the workplace ranked by mean.
    Item Mean
    Long working hours 3.161
    Work overload 2.779
    Fear of violence 2.623
    Lack of resources 2.588
    Work demands affect my personal homelife 2.362
    Fear of making mistake that can lead to serious consequences 2.302
    Working with uncooperative colleagues 2.302
    Poor work environment 2.281
    Office work 1.985
    Cannot participate in decision-making 1.995

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 4.  Relationship between burnout and socio-demographic characteristics.
    Variables Nurses' burnout
    EE
    DP
    PA
    Mean (SD) P value Mean (SD) P value Mean (SD) P value
    Age
     ≤35 21.4 (11.5) 8.9 (5.0) 21.2(5.8)
     >35 24.9 (13.5) 0.041 9.6 (6.4) 0.348 16.1(5.5) 0.002
    Gender
     Male 23.4 (13.4) 9.2 (5.2) 17.9 (6.2)
     Female 22.9 (12.2) 0.807 9.3 (5.1) 0.855 19.0 (5.0) 0.502
    Marital status
     Single 22.2 (13.1) 8.9 (5.2) 20.0(5.4)
     Married 23.2 (12.5) 9.3 (5.7) 18.3(5.1)
     Divorced/widower 22.6 (13.8) 0.910 9.3 (7.2) 0.926 17.7(6.2) 0.794
    Educational level
     Diploma 21.2 (12.8) 9.2 (5.8) 20.8 (5.4)
     University 28.4 (10.3) <0.001 9.4 (5.5) 0.800 14.2 (7.2) 0.001
    Years of service
     5 or less 22.8 (12.1) 8.3 (4.5) 22.8 (4.2)
     6–10 21.9 (11.3) 9.4 (5.3) 19.4 (6.4)
     >10 23.7 (13.3) 0.658 9.4 (6.2) 0.627 17.3 (5.7) 0.060
    Administrative task
     Yes 22.4 (11.2) 8.7 (5.4) 23.2 (6.5)
     No 23.2 (12.9) 0.727 9.4 (5.8) 0.464 17.7 (7.4) 0.021
    Monthly income (SAR)
     <12000 24.6 (11.8) 10.5 (5.5) 26.3 (6.4)
     ≥12000 22.0 (12.9) 0.138 8.4 (5.7) 0.014 25.5 (5.6) 0.921

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In univariate analysis, emotional exhaustion score was significantly higher among those aged >35 years (24.9 ± 13.5) compared to those aged ≤35 years (21.4 ± 11.5), (p = 0.041), and among those who had Bachelor degree (28.4 ± 10.3) compared to those who had diploma (21.2 ± 12.8), (p < 0.001) (Table 4).

    EE was correlated positively and significantly with all the ten sources of stress (r coefficient ranged from 0.379 to 0.586), (p < 0.001) (Table 5). DP was higher among those who had an income of <12000 SAR (10.5 ± 5.5) compared to those with income of ≥12000 (8.4 ± 3.7), (p = 0.014) (Table 4). DP was correlated positively and significantly with all the ten sources of stress (r coefficient ranged from 0.198 to 0.368), (p < 0.005) (Table 5). PA was significantly lower among those who aged >35 years (16.1 ± 5.5) compared to those aged ≤35 years (21.2 ± 5.8), (p = 0.002), among those who had university degree (14.2 ± 7.2) compared to those who had diploma (20.8 ± 5.4), (p = 0.001) and among those who had not administrative task (17.7 ± 7.4) compared to those who had (23.2 ± 6.5), (p = 0.021) (Table 4).

    Table 5.  Relationship between burnout and sources of stress in the workplace.
    Item EE
    DP
    PA
    Coefficient P value Coefficient P value Coefficient P value
    Work overload 0.495 <0.001 0.204 0.004 −0.106 0.135
    Long working hours 0.379 <0.001 0.198 0.005 −0.007. 0.926
    Fear of violence 0.422 <0.001 0.216 0.002 −0.100 0.161
    Poor work environment 0.586 <0.001 0.368 <0.001 −0.219 0.002
    Lack of resources 0.511 <0.001 0.301 <0.001 −0.086 0.228
    Fear of making mistake that can lead to serious consequences 0.428 <0.001 0.220 <0.001 −0.097 0.174
    Working with uncooperative colleagues 0.362 <0.001 0.197 0.005 −0.064 0.365
    Office work 0.340 <0.001 0.273 <0.001 −0.055 0.436
    Cannot participate in decision-making 0.424 <0.001 0.329 <0.001 −0.028 0.697
    Work demands affect my personal home life 0.525 <0.001 0.249 <0.001 −0.0091 0.200

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In multivariate analysis, significant predictors of EE were work overload (p = 0.010), poor work environment (p < 0.001), lack of resources (p = 0.033), working with uncooperative colleagues (p = 0.005), work demands affect personal homelife (p < 0.001) and having university education (p < 0.001) (Table 6). Significant predictors of DP were poor work environment (p < 0.001), “cannot participate in decision-making” (p = 0.041) and low income (<12000 SAR) (Table 6). Low personal accomplishment was significantly predicted by age (>35 years) (p=0.001), educational level (university), (p = 0.004) and no administrative task (p = 0.003) (Table 6).

    Table 6.  Factors associated with burnout in multivariate analysis.
    B SE Beta P value VIF
    Emotional exhaustion
    Work overload 1.636 0.63 0.170 0.010 1.688
    Poor work environment 3.134 0.68 0.318 <0.001 1.887
    Lack of resources 1.473 0.68 0.148 0.033 1.853
    Fear of making mistake that can lead to serious consequences 1.038 0.59 0.110 0.082 1.565
    Working with uncooperative colleagues 1.875 0.65 −0.199 0.005 1.907
    Work demands affect my personal home life 2.226 0.56 0.267 <0.001 1.774
    University (reference = diploma) 6.009 1.51 0.206 <0.001 1.052
    Depersonalization
    Poor work environment 1.246 0.35 0.278 <0.001 1.246
    Cannot participate in decision-making 0.702 0.35 0.156 0.041 0.702
    Monthly income less than 12K SAR −1.776 0.76 −0.0152 0.021 −1.776
    Personal accomplishment
    Age (>35) −5.550 1.59 −0.0234 0.001 1.009
    Educational level (Bachelor) −5.354 1.82 −0.0196 0.004 1.001
    No administrative task −5.960 1.98 −0.0201 0.003 1.010

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The primary aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of burnout and its associated factors among nurses in the primary health care setting. This study found 89% of the participants scored high at least on one subscale of burnout. Low personal accomplishment was found among 89% of nurses while high EE and high DP were reported by 39%, and 38% respectively. Moderate level of burnout was found among 25% (EE), 39% (DP) and 5.5% (PA). The overall prevalence of burnout in this study was 89%.

    Previous studies among nurses in Saudi Arabia found that 32 % to 71.6% of nurses had high levels of burnout [5][8]. It was found by Al-Turki et al. that 45% of nurses had high EE, 42% had high depersonalization and 71.5% had low personal accomplishment. [5] Another study from Saudi Arabia found that 71.6 % of nurses had high level of burnout. [7] Another study from Saudi Arabia reported that 42% of nurses had moderate level of stress. [8] However, these two previous studies did not define the cut-off point for burnout. All the other mentioned studies used Maslach burnout inventory.

    A recent study from Egypt found that 54.6% of nurses had average levels of emotional exhaustion, 48% scored high on depersonalization, and 77.5% had low personal accomplishment [11]. Another study from Egypt found that 52.8% of nurses experienced high EE, 7.2% had high level of DP and 96.5% had low PA [12]. A study among Iranian nurses found that 25% of the participants had high level of burnout. [13] A study of nurses in Israel reported that 30.8% reported high emotional exhaustion, 5.1% had high depersonalization, and 84.6% had low personal accomplishment [14]. In Jordan 55% of nurses reported high level of emotional exhaustion, 50% reported high level of depersonalization, and 50% reported low personal accomplishment [15]. A recent international meta-analysis study that investigated burnout among nurses found that 28% of nurses had high level emotional exhaustion, 15% had high level of depersonalization and 31% had low personal accomplishment [4]. Regarding factors associated with burnout, this study found that high emotional exhaustion was associated with age group, level of education, and with sources of stress in the work place such as work overload, lack of resources, uncooperative colleagues, and poor working environment. DP was associated with low income, poor working environment and inability to participate in decision-making. Low PA was associated with age group, level of education and no engagement in administrative work.

    While some studies had not found association between burnout and socio-demographic factors, [8] some other studies had found a significant association between burnout and age, marital status and education level [5],[7]. However, there is a great agreement between studies that burnout is associated with stress and sources of stress in the workplace [15][20].

    That sources of stress in the workplace included role conflict, work overload, conflict with colleagues, long working hours, poor working environment and low supervisor support. A previous meta-analysis study found that job insecurity, low job control, low reward, high demands and high work load increased the risk for developing burnout [21].

    Long-term exposure to stressors was found to affect the professional quality of life, leading to cognitive and emotional distress and burnout [22]. Continuous effort in stressful, demanding tasks can have physiological and psychological impacts, such as increased heart rate and prolonged stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system. This is well recognized to be associated with exhaustion, particularly when the workload is high. Long working hours was found to be associated with emotional exhaustion because it produces excessive demands and disrupt family life and ability to trail outside interests [15][17].

    This finding emphasis that any effort to manage burnout should be directed toward the management of sources of stress in the work place. Burnout was also found to be affected by other factors rather than work related factors and stressors in the work place. It was found in the previous studies that Alexithymic personality trait increased likelihood to experience burnout and has a negative effect on the professional quality of life among. radiation oncologists [23],[24]. In addition, emotional intelligence was found to be linked with all the three parts of burnout [25]. Emotional intelligence is defined as the ability to perceive emotion, integrate emotion to facilitate thought, understand emotions, and regulate emotions to promote personal growth [26].

    This study found that 89% of the participants scored high at least on one subscale of burnout. Burnout was associated mainly with work related sources of stress. A comprehensive interventional approach is needed to minimize and prevent burnout among nurses in the primary health care centers. There were three types of interventions to manage burnout: individual-focused, organizational, and combine interventions. Individual-focused interventions included self-care workshops, stress management skills, communication skills training, yoga, mindfulness, meditation and coping programs. Organizational interventions aimed mainly to reduces stress and to mitigate the impact of stressors in the workplace; they included workload or schedule-rotation, stress management training program, access to peer mentoring, help and guidance from experienced work colleagues and teamwork/transitions. Individual and organizational interventions should be combined to effectively reduce burnout among healthcare providers. It would be also of great interest if future studies investigate which personality factors are associated with burnout in nursing working in primary health care centers. This will help to prioritize intervention to focus on nurses with high risk personality trait. Interventions to improve emotional intelligence are also recommended. Poulsen & Poulsen (2018) proposed a Self-Determination Theory and they suggested two steps to prevent burnout during early career. The first step was to educate trainers and trainees about times when individuals may be vulnerable to work stress. Learning how to recognize the warning signs of burnout and being aware of vulnerability is a vital first step. Education about the need for self-awareness and importance of self-care would occur in the early stages of training. The next step involved alerting practitioners regarding the extent and accessibility of information regarding evidence-based strategies that can be employed to address exhaustion and prevent disengagement [27].



    Limitations



    Our study is limited by participant location, cross-sectional nature of the study, and self-reported data. Because of the cross-sectional nature of our study, we cannot predict causation from our data and can only study associations between variables.

    Conflict of interest



    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.

    [1] (2019) World Health OrganizationBurn-Out an “Occupational Phenomenon”: International Classification of Diseases. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Available From: https://wwwwhoint/mental_health/evidence/burn-out/en/
    [2] Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP, Maslach C (2009) Burnout: 35 years of research and practice. Career Dev Int 14: 204-220. doi: 10.1108/13620430910966406
    [3] Chuang CH, Tseng PC, Lin CY, et al. (2016) Burnout in the intensive care unit professionals: a systematic review. Medicine 95: e5629. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005629
    [4] Monsalve-Reyes CS, San Luis-Costas C, Gómez-Urquiza JL, et al. (2018) Burnout syndrome and its prevalence in primary care nursing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Fam Pract 19: 59. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0748-z
    [5] Al-Turki HA, Al-Turki RA, Al-Dardas HA, et al. (2010) Burnout syndrome among multinational nurses working in Saudi Arabia. Ann Afr Med 9: 226-229. doi: 10.4103/1596-3519.70960
    [6] Karkar A, Dammang ML, Bouhaha BM (2015) Stress and burnout among hemodialysis nurses: A single-center, prospective survey study. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 26: 12. doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.148712
    [7] Zaki SM, Elsayed LA, Ibrahim MM (2016) Factors contributing to burnout among Saudi nurses and their effect on patients' satisfaction at Makkah Al-Mukaramah hospitals. Life Sci J 13: 73-88.
    [8] Batayneh MH, Ali S, Nashwan AJ (2019) The Burnout among Multinational Nurses in Saudi Arabia. Open J Nurs 9: 603-619. doi: 10.4236/ojn.2019.97049
    [9] Al-Dubai SA, Rampal KG (2010) Prevalence and associated factors of burnout among doctors in Yemen. J Occup Health 52: 58-65. doi: 10.1539/joh.O8030
    [10] Aldubai SA, Aljohani AM, Alghamdi AG, et al. (2019) Prevalence and associated factors of burnout among family medicine residents in Al Madina, Saudi Arabia. J Fam Med Prim Care 8: 657-662. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_268_18
    [11] Anwar MM, Elareed HR (2017) Burnout among Egyptian nurses. J Pub Health 25: 693-697. doi: 10.1007/s10389-017-0831-2
    [12] Abdo SA, El-Sallamy RM, El-Sherbiny AA, et al. (2016) Burnout among physicians and nursing staff working in the emergency hospital of Tanta University, Egypt. East Mediterr Health J 21: 906-915. doi: 10.26719/2015.21.12.906
    [13] Sahraian A, Fazelzadeh A, Mehdizadeh AR, et al. (2008) Burnout in hospital nurses: a comparison of internal, surgery, psychiatry and burns wards. Int Nurs Rev 55: 62-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2007.00582.x
    [14] Emold C, Schneider N, Meller I, et al. (2011) Communication skills, working environment and burnout among oncology nurses. Eur J Oncol Nurs 15: 358-363. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2010.08.001
    [15] Hamaideh SH (2011) Burnout, social support, and job satisfaction among Jordanian mental health nurses. Issues Ment Health Nurs 32: 234-242. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2010.546494
    [16] Hudek-Knezević J, Kalebić Maglica B, Krapić N (2011) Personality, organizational stress, and attitudes toward work as prospective predictors of professional burnout in hospital nurses. Croat Med J 52: 538-549. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2011.52.538
    [17] Navarro-González D, Ayechu-Díaz A, Huarte-Labiano (2015) Prevalence of burnout syndrome and its associated factors in Primary Care staff. Semergen 41: 191-198. doi: 10.1016/j.semerg.2014.03.008
    [18] Liu X, Zheng J, Liu K, et al. (2018) Hospital nursing organizational factors, nursing care left undone, and nurse burnout as predictors of patient safety: A structural equation modeling analysis. Inter J Nurs Stud 1: 82-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.05.005
    [19] Nantsupawat A, Kunaviktikul W, Nantsupawat R, et al. (2017) Effects of nurse work environment on job dissatisfaction, burnout, intention to leave. Inter Nurs Rev 64: 91-98. doi: 10.1111/inr.12342
    [20] Weigl M, Stab N, Herms I, et al. (2016) The associations of supervisor support and work overload with burnout and depression: A cross-sectional study in two nursing settings. J Adv Nurs 72: 1774-1788. doi: 10.1111/jan.12948
    [21] Aronsson G, Theorell T, Grape T, et al. (2017) A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and burnout symptoms. BMC Public Health 17: 264. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4153-7
    [22] Ciammella P, De Bari B, Fiorentino A, et al. (2013) The ‘BUONGIORNO’ project: burnout syndrome among young Italian radiation oncologists. Cancer Invest 31: 522-528. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2013.830735
    [23] Franco P, Tesio V, Bertholet J, et al. (2020) The role of alexithymia and empathy on radiation therapists' professional quality of life. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 15: 29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2020.07.001
    [24] Franco P, Tesio V, Bertholet J, et al. (2020) Professional quality of life and burnout amongst radiation oncologists: the impact of alexythymia and empathy. Radiother Oncol 147: 162-168. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.05.017
    [25] Pishghadam R, Sahebjam S (2012) Personality and emotional intelligence in teacher burnout. Span J Psychol 15: 227. doi: 10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n1.37314
    [26] Weng HC, Hung CM, Liu YT, et al. (2011) Associations between emotional intelligence and doctor burnout, job satisfaction and patient satisfaction. Med Edu 45: 835-842. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.03985.x
    [27] Poulsen M, Poulsen AA (2018) Optimizing motivation and reducing burnout for radiation oncology trainees: A framework using self-determination theory. J Med Imag Radiat Oncol 62: 684-691. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12725
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Debora Paulino da Silva Almeida, Paula Vitali Miclos, Enfermagem na Atenção Primária à Saúde: associação entre liderança, capital psicológico e implicações no burnout, 2022, 75, 1984-0446, 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0942pt
    2. Juan Wang, Fangxiang Mao, Liuliu Wu, Xiaomei Yang, Xuan Zhang, Yaoyao Sun, Yongqi Huang, Yan’ e Lu, Xiaorong Luan, Fenglin Cao, Work‐related potential traumatic events and job burnout among operating room nurses: Independent effect, cumulative risk, and latent class approaches, 2022, 78, 0309-2402, 2042, 10.1111/jan.15114
    3. Nadiah A. Baghdadi, Shatha Khalid Alsayed, Ghalia Amer Malki, Hossam Magdy Balaha, Sally Mohammed Farghaly Abdelaliem, An Analysis of Burnout among Female Nurse Educators in Saudi Arabia Using K-Means Clustering, 2022, 13, 2254-9625, 33, 10.3390/ejihpe13010003
    4. Jumanah T. Qedair, Renad Balubaid, Raghad Almadani, Suzana Ezzi, Tarteel Qumosani, Rania Zahid, Turki Alfayea, Prevalence and factors associated with burnout among nurses in Jeddah: a single-institution cross-sectional study, 2022, 21, 1472-6955, 10.1186/s12912-022-01070-2
    5. Debora Paulino da Silva Almeida, Paula Vitali Miclos, Nursing in Primary Health Care: association between leadership, psychological capital, and burnout implications, 2022, 75, 1984-0446, 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0942
    6. DuoaaSeddiq Abdoh, MohammedAdeeb Shahin, AhmedKhalid Ali, ShumukhMohammed Alhejaili, OsamaMadani Kiram, SamiAbdo Radman Al-Dubai, Prevalence and associated factors of stress among primary health care nurses in Saudi Arabia, a multi-center study, 2021, 10, 2249-4863, 2692, 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_222_21
    7. Sara Lotfi-Bejestani, Foroozan Atashzadeh-Shoorideh, Raziyeh Ghafouri, Malihe Nasiri, Kayoko Ohnishi, Fataneh Ghadirian, Is there any relationship between nurses’ perceived organizational justice, moral sensitivity, moral courage, moral distress and burnout?, 2023, 22, 1472-6955, 10.1186/s12912-023-01536-x
    8. Salman Alreshidi, Ahmad Rayani, Predictors of Compassion Satisfaction, Compassion Fatigue, and Burnout Among Nursing Professionals in a Medical City in Saudi Arabia, 2023, Volume 16, 1179-1594, 2883, 10.2147/RMHP.S430082
    9. Ahmad Rayani, Jean Hannan, Salman Alreshidi, Ahmad Aboshaiqah, Abdulaziz Alodhailah, Essa Hakamy, Compassion Satisfaction, Burnout, and Secondary Traumatic Stress among Saudi Nurses at Medical City: A Cross-Sectional Study, 2024, 12, 2227-9032, 847, 10.3390/healthcare12080847
    10. Ohoud Alonazi, Amira Alshowkan, Emad Shdaifat, The relationship between psychological resilience and professional quality of life among mental health nurses: a cross-sectional study, 2023, 22, 1472-6955, 10.1186/s12912-023-01346-1
    11. Hanan A. Alkorashy, Aisha F. Basheer, Hanem F. Mohamed, The Moderating Role of Emotional Intelligence on the Relationship Between Nurses’ Preparedness to Care for COVID-19 Patients and Their Quality of Work Life, 2024, 14, 2076-328X, 1166, 10.3390/bs14121166
    12. Rasha Mohammed Hussien, Talal Ali F. Alharbi, Ibrahim Alasqah, Nada Alqarawi, Andrew Dumale Ngo, Azza Elsayed Abd Elfatah Arafat, Meead Abdulaziz Alsohibani, Mohamed Ali Zoromba, Burnout Among Primary Healthcare Nurses: A Study of Association With Depression, Anxiety and Self‐Efficacy, 2025, 34, 1445-8330, 10.1111/inm.13496
    13. Fang Xue, Jing Liu, Tong Zhou, Xiuchuan Li, Chunfang Liu, Xueer Li, Shuoshuo Li, Ping Ye, Jing Zhang, The relationship between burnout, sense of coherence and job safety attitudes among nurses after coronavirus disease 2019 in China: a cross-sectional survey, 2025, 13, 2296-2565, 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1516744
    14. Makhigul Maxudova, Dinara Ospanova, Areti Stavropoulou, Lyazzat Alibekova, Gulnar Sultanova, Galina Veklenko, Kundyzay Tobzhanova, Burnout Among Hospital Nurses in Kazakhstan, 2025, 15, 2039-4403, 92, 10.3390/nursrep15030092
    15. Bushra Bawazier, Hebah Almulla, Mansour Mansour, Sama Hammad, Rana Alameri, Latifa Aldossary, Tahani AlShammari, The Relationship Between Perceived Self-Efficacy and Resilience Among Pediatric Nurses in Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia, 2025, Volume 18, 1179-1594, 739, 10.2147/RMHP.S510084
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(6258) PDF downloads(205) Cited by(15)

Figures and Tables

Tables(6)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog