The purpose of this manuscript was to design a better method for recovery from rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) surgery. We attempted to achieve this by designing a helmet that can manipulate intraocular magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) and create a magnetic tamponade, eliminating the need for postoperative head positioning. A simulated analysis was developed to predict the pattern of magnetic force applied to the magnetic nanoparticles by external magnetic field. No participants were involved in this study. Instead, magnetic flux and force data for three different helmet designs were collected using virtual simulation tools. A prototype helmet was then constructed and magnetic flux and force data were recorded and compared to virtual data. For both virtual and physical scenarios, magnitude and direction of the resulting forces were compared to determine which design created the controlled direction and strongest forces into the back of the eye. Of the three virtual designs, both designs containing a visor had greater force magnitude than magnet alone. Between both designs with visors, the visor with bends resulted in forces more directed at the back of the eye. The physical prototype helmet shared similar measurements to virtual simulation with minimal percent error (Average = 5.47%, Standard deviation = 0.03). Of the three designs, the visor with bends generated stronger forces directed at the back of the eye, which is most appropriate for creating a tamponade on the retina. We believe that this design has shown promising capability for manipulating intraocular MNPs for the purpose of creating a tamponade for RRD.
Citation: Evan Parker, Chandler S. Mitchell, Joshua P Smith, Evan Carr, Rasul Akbari, Afshin Izadian, Amir R Hajrasouliha. Modeling of external self-excitation and force generation on magnetic nanoparticles inside vitreous cavity[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 9381-9393. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021461
The purpose of this manuscript was to design a better method for recovery from rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) surgery. We attempted to achieve this by designing a helmet that can manipulate intraocular magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) and create a magnetic tamponade, eliminating the need for postoperative head positioning. A simulated analysis was developed to predict the pattern of magnetic force applied to the magnetic nanoparticles by external magnetic field. No participants were involved in this study. Instead, magnetic flux and force data for three different helmet designs were collected using virtual simulation tools. A prototype helmet was then constructed and magnetic flux and force data were recorded and compared to virtual data. For both virtual and physical scenarios, magnitude and direction of the resulting forces were compared to determine which design created the controlled direction and strongest forces into the back of the eye. Of the three virtual designs, both designs containing a visor had greater force magnitude than magnet alone. Between both designs with visors, the visor with bends resulted in forces more directed at the back of the eye. The physical prototype helmet shared similar measurements to virtual simulation with minimal percent error (Average = 5.47%, Standard deviation = 0.03). Of the three designs, the visor with bends generated stronger forces directed at the back of the eye, which is most appropriate for creating a tamponade on the retina. We believe that this design has shown promising capability for manipulating intraocular MNPs for the purpose of creating a tamponade for RRD.
[1] | C. Wong, W. Wong, I. Yeo, B. Loh, E. Wong, D. Wong, et al., Trends and Factors Related To Outcomes For Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Surgery In A Large Asian Tertiary Eye Center, Retina., 34 (2014), 684-692. |
[2] | J. Hwang, Regional practice patterns for retinal detachment repair in the United States, Am. J. Ophthalmol., 153 (2012), 1125-1128. |
[3] | F. Kuhn, B. Aylward, Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Reappraisal of Its Pathophysiology and Treatment, Ophthalmic Res., 51 (2014), 15-31. |
[4] | M. Johnson, Postoperative Positioning Following RD Surgery, Retinal Physician, 10 (2013), 25-29. |
[5] | M. Kita, A. Negi, S. Kawano, Y. Honda, Photothermal cryogenic, and diathermic effects on retinal adhesive force in vivo, Retina., 11 (1991), 441-444. |
[6] | O. Kwon, S. Kim, Changes in adhesive force between the retina and the retinal pigment epithelium by laser photocoagulation in rabbits, Yonsei Med. J., 36 (1995), 243-250. doi: 10.3349/ymj.1995.36.3.243 |
[7] | L. Poliner, P. Tornambe, Failed retinal detachment repair after intravitreal air injection, Arch. Ophthalmol., 107 (1989), 487-488. |
[8] | Y. Yoon, M. Marmor, Rapid enhancement of retinal adhesion by laser photocoagulation, Ophthalmology., 95 (1988), 1385-1388. |
[9] | R. Ajlan, J. Isenberg, G. Cordahi, R. Duval, S. Olivier, F. Rezende, Primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with inferior retinal breaks postoperative prone positioning results: 1 day versus 7 days, Int. J. Retin. Vitr., 3 (2017), 1-6. doi: 10.1186/s40942-016-0054-7 |
[10] | G. Hilton, T. Das, A. Majji, S. Jalali, Pneumatic retinopexy-principles and practice, Indian J. Ophthalmol., 4 (1996), 131-143. |
[11] | S. Stewart, W. Chan, Pneumatic retinopexy: patient selection and specific factors. Clin. Ophthalmol., 12 (2018), 493-502. |
[12] | Y. Seno, Y. Shimada, T. Mizuguchi, A. Tanikawa, M. Horiguchi, Compliance with the face-down positioning after vitrectomy and gas tamponade for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments, Retina., 35 (2015), 1436-1440. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000479 |
[13] | D. Steel, Retinal Detachment, BMJ Clin. Evid., (2014), 0710. |
[14] | R. Adelman, A. Parnes, D. Ducournau, European Vitreo-Retinal Society (EVRS) Retinal Detachment Study Group, Strategy for the management of uncomplicated retinal detachments: The European Vitreo-Retinal Society Retinal Detachment study report 1, Ophthalmology., 120 (2013), 1804-1808. |
[15] | M. Choudhary, M. Choudhary, M. Saeed, A. Ali, Removal of silicone oil: Prognostic factors and incidence of retinal redetachment, Retina., 32 (2012), 2034-2038. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182562045 |
[16] | K. Wu, D. Su, J. Liu, R. Saha, J. Wang, Magnetic nanoparticles in nanomedicine: a review of recent advances, Nanotech., 30 (2019), 502003. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/ab4241 |
[17] | B. Shapiro, S. Kulkarni, A. Nacev, A. Sarwar, D. Preciado, D. Depireux, Shaping Magnetic Fields to Direct Therapy to Ears and Eyes, Ann. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 16 (2014), 455-481. |
[18] | P. Liang, Y. Chen, C. Chiang, L. Mo, S. Wei, W. Hsieh, et al., Doxorubicin-modified magnetic nanoparticles as a drug delivery system for magnetic resonance imaging-monitoring magnet-enhancing tumor chemotherapy, Int. J. Nanomed., 11 (2016), 2021-2037. |
[19] | R. Kopke, R. Wassel, F. Mondalek, B. Grady, K. Chen, J. Liu, et al., Magnetic nanoparticles: Inner ear targeted molecule delivery and middle ear implant, Audiol Neurotol., 11 (2006), 123-133. |