Mechanical properties and brittleness of concrete made by combined fly ash, silica fume and nanosilica with ordinary Portland cement

Grzegorz Ludwik Golewski; Grzegorz Ludwik Golewski

doi:10.3934/matersci.2023021

AIMS Materials Science

2023, Volume 10, Issue 3: 390-404. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023021

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Mechanical properties and brittleness of concrete made by combined fly ash, silica fume and nanosilica with ordinary Portland cement

Grzegorz Ludwik Golewski ^,

Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 40 str., 20-618, Lublin, Poland

Received: 28 July 2022 Revised: 09 January 2023 Accepted: 10 April 2023 Published: 06 May 2023

This paper introduced a new concrete composites made by quaternary binder by partially replacing ordinary Portland cement (OPC) with different percentages of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). The motivation is to reduce our dependency on OPC to reduce CO₂ emission and carbon foot print. As the main substitute for the OPC, siliceous fly ash was used (FA). Moreover, silica fume (SF) and nanosilica (nS) were also used. This study utilized the following contents of SCMs used: 5% of nS; 10% of SF; 0, 15, and 25% of FA. During examinations the main mechanical properties of concrete composites, i.e. compressive strength (f_cm) and splitting tensile strength (f_ctm) were assed. The brittleness of these materials was also analysed. Based on the conducted studies, it was found that concrete composite based on quaternary blended cements, of series Mix3, has shown the best results in terms of good strength parameters, whereas the worst mechanical parameters were characterized by concrete of series Mix4. On the other hand, concrete including only SF and nS (Mix2 series) were characterized by the greatest brittleness. It was observed that f_cm of concrete composites for series Mix2, Mix3, and Mix4 increase of 41%, 48%, and 31% respectively compared with the concrete without additives, i.e. series Mix1. In addition, f_ctm also increase of 39%, 47%, and 30%, respectively, for the three series mentioned above, compared with the control concrete. Concrete of series Mix3, with high mechanical properties and demonstrating the features of quasi-plastic material, i.e. having lower brittleness, can be used in concrete and reinforced concrete structures subjected mainly to dynamic and cyclic loads. Therefore, it can be used, in the construction of foundation structures for machines and other types of structures in which the above-mentioned loads are dominant.
- siliceous fly ash (FA),
- silica fume (SF),
- nanosilica (nS),
- quaternary binder concrete,
- mechanical properties,
- brittleness,
- sustainable construction
Citation: Grzegorz Ludwik Golewski. Mechanical properties and brittleness of concrete made by combined fly ash, silica fume and nanosilica with ordinary Portland cement[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(3): 390-404. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023021

Related Papers:

Abstract

This paper introduced a new concrete composites made by quaternary binder by partially replacing ordinary Portland cement (OPC) with different percentages of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). The motivation is to reduce our dependency on OPC to reduce CO₂ emission and carbon foot print. As the main substitute for the OPC, siliceous fly ash was used (FA). Moreover, silica fume (SF) and nanosilica (nS) were also used. This study utilized the following contents of SCMs used: 5% of nS; 10% of SF; 0, 15, and 25% of FA. During examinations the main mechanical properties of concrete composites, i.e. compressive strength (f_cm) and splitting tensile strength (f_ctm) were assed. The brittleness of these materials was also analysed. Based on the conducted studies, it was found that concrete composite based on quaternary blended cements, of series Mix3, has shown the best results in terms of good strength parameters, whereas the worst mechanical parameters were characterized by concrete of series Mix4. On the other hand, concrete including only SF and nS (Mix2 series) were characterized by the greatest brittleness. It was observed that f_cm of concrete composites for series Mix2, Mix3, and Mix4 increase of 41%, 48%, and 31% respectively compared with the concrete without additives, i.e. series Mix1. In addition, f_ctm also increase of 39%, 47%, and 30%, respectively, for the three series mentioned above, compared with the control concrete. Concrete of series Mix3, with high mechanical properties and demonstrating the features of quasi-plastic material, i.e. having lower brittleness, can be used in concrete and reinforced concrete structures subjected mainly to dynamic and cyclic loads. Therefore, it can be used, in the construction of foundation structures for machines and other types of structures in which the above-mentioned loads are dominant.

References

[1]	Chen L, Zhao J, Meng X, et al. (2023) Experimental evaluation on mechanical and thermal insulation properties of shotcrete under constant-variable temperature. Struct Concrete 24: 2041–2056. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202200200 doi: 10.1002/suco.202200200
[2]	Abood AM, Khazal H, Hassan AF (2022) On the determination of first-mode stress intensity factors and T-stress in a continuous functionally graded beam using digital image correlation method. AIMS Mater Sci 9: 56–70. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2022004 doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022004
[3]	Golewski GL (2022) The specificity of shaping and execution of monolithic pocket foundations (PF) in hall buildings. Buildings 12: 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020192. doi: 10.3390/buildings12020192
[4]	Kovacik J, Marsavina L, Linul E (2018) Poisson's ratio of closed-cell aluminum foams. Materials 11: 1904. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11101904 doi: 10.3390/ma11101904
[5]	Shaban WM, Yang J, Su H, et al. (2019) Properties of recycled concrete aggregates strengthened by different types of pozzolan slurry. Constr Build Mater 216: 632–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.231 doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.231
[6]	Tayeh BA, Alyousef R, Alabduljabbar H, et al. (2021) Recycling of rice husk waste for sustainable concrete: A critical review. J Clean Prod 312: 127734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127734 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127734
[7]	Abdulrahman H, Muhamad R, Visitin P, et al. (2022) Mechanical properties and bond stress-slip behaviour of fly ash geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 327: 126909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126909 doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126909
[8]	Alex AG, Kemal Z, Gebrehiwet T, et al. (2022) Effect of α: Phase nano Al₂O₃ and rice husk ash in cement mortar. Adv Civ Eng 2022: 4335736. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4335736 doi: 10.1155/2022/4335736
[9]	Chen S, Wang H, Guan J, et al. (2022) Determination method and prediction model of fracture and strength of recycled aggregate concrete at different curing ages. Constr Build Mater 343: 128070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128070 doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128070
[10]	Guan J, Yin Y, Li Y, et al. (2022) A design method for determining fracture toughness and tensile strength pertinent to concrete sieving curve. Eng Fract Mech 271: 108596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108596 doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108596
[11]	Wu J, Yang J, Zhang R, et al. (2022) Fatigue life estimating for chloride attacked RC beams using S-N curve combined with mesoscale simulation of chloride ingress. Int J Fat 158: 106751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106751 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106751
[12]	Guan J, Zhang Y, Meng J, et al. (2022) A simple method for determining independent fracture toughness and tensile strength of rock. Int J Min Sci Technol 32: 707–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2022.05.004 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2022.05.004
[13]	Zeyad AM, Tayeh BA, Yusuf MO (2019) Strength and transport characteristics of volcanic pumice powder based high strength concrete. Constr Build Mater 216: 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.026 doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.026
[14]	Gao Y, Jing H, Yu Z, et al. (2022) Particle size distribution of aggregate effects on the reinforcing roles of carbon nanotubes in enhancing concrete ITZ. Constr Build Mater 327: 126964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126964 doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126964
[15]	Szeląg M (2018) Development of cracking patterns in modified cement matrix with microsilica. Materials 11: 1928. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11101928 doi: 10.3390/ma11101928
[16]	Xie T, Yang G, Zhao X, et al. (2020) A unified model for predicting the compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete containing supplementary cementitious materials. J Clean Prod 251: 119752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119752 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119752
[17]	Nodehi M, Ozbakkaloglu T, Gholampour A (2022) Effect of supplementary cementitious materials on properties of 3D printed conventional and alkali-activated concrete: A review. Autom Constr 138: 104215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104215 doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104215
[18]	Bicer A (2020) Effect of production temperature on thermal and mechanical properties of polystyrene-fly ash composites. Adv Compos Lett 29: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2633366X20917988 doi: 10.1177/2633366X20917988
[19]	Thorstensen RT (2019) Preventing early age chloride into low-carbon concrete. AIMS Mater Sci 6: 1020-1032. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2019.6.1020. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.6.1020
[20]	Wang L, Zhang P, Golewski, G, et al. (2023) Editorial: Fabrication and properties of concrete containing industrial waste. Front Mater 10: 1169715. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2023.1169715 doi: 10.3389/fmats.2023.1169715
[21]	Han Q, Zhang P, Wu J, et al. (2022) Comprehensive review of the properties of fly ash-based geopolymer with additive of nano-SiO₂. Nanotech Rev 1: 1478–1498. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2022-0092 doi: 10.1515/ntrev-2022-0092
[22]	Wang J, Li J, Shi Z, et al. (2022) Energy evolution and failure characteristics of red sandstone under discontinuous multilevel fatigue loading. Int J Fat 160: 106830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106830 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106830
[23]	Lyratzakis A, Tsompanakis Y, Psarropoulos PN (2022) Efficient mitigation of high-speed train vibrations on adjacent reinforced concrete buildings. Constr Build Mater 314: 125653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125653 doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125653
[24]	Park S, Beak J, Kim K, et al. (2021) Study on reduction effect of vibration propagation due to internal explosion using composite materials. Int J Concr Struct Mater 15: 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-021-00467-8 doi: 10.1186/s40069-021-00467-8
[25]	Fakoor M, Shahsavar S (2021) The effect of T-stress on mixed mode Ⅰ/Ⅱ fracture of composite materials: reinforcement isotropic solid model in combination with maximum shear stress theory. Int J Sol Struct 229: 111145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2021.111145 doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2021.111145
[26]	Mehri Khansari N, Fakoor M, Berto F (2019) Probabilistic micromechanical damage model for mixed mode Ⅰ/Ⅱ fracture investigation of composite materials. Theor Appl Fract Mech 99: 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.12.003 doi: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.12.003
[27]	Craciun EM (2008) Energy criteria for crack propagation in prestresses elastic composites. Sol Mech Appl 154: 193–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8772-1_7 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8772-1_7
[28]	Singh A, Das S, Craciun EM (2019) Effect of thermomechanical loading on an edge crack of finite length in an infinite orthotropic strip. Mech Compos Mater 55: 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11029-019-09812-1 doi: 10.1007/s11029-019-09812-1
[29]	Golewski GL, Szostak B (2022) Strength and microstructure of composites with cement matrixes modified by fly ash and active seeds of C–S–H phase. Struct Eng Mech 82: 543–556. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2022.82.4.543 doi: 10.12989/sem.2022.82.4.543
[30]	Biricik H, Sarier N (2014) Comparative study of the characteristics of nanosilica-, silica fume- and fly ash-incorporated cement mortars. Mater Res 17: 570–582. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392014005000054. doi: 10.1590/S1516-14392014005000054
[31]	Karim MR, Zain MFM, Jamil M, et al. (2015) Development of a zero-cement binder using slag, fly ash, and rice husk ash with chemical activator. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2015: 247065. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/247065 doi: 10.1155/2015/247065
[32]	Sohu S, Bheel N, Jhatial AH, et al. (2022) Sustainability and mechanical property assessment of concrete incorporating eggshell powder and silica fume as binary and ternary cementitious materials. Env Sci Poll Res 29: 58685–58697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19894-5 doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19894-5
[33]	Tee KF, Mostofizadeh S (2021) Numerical and experimental investigation of concrete with various dosage of fly ash. AIMS Mater Sci 8: 587–607. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2021036 doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021036
[34]	Han F, Pu S, Zhou Y, et al. (2022) Effect of ultrafine mineral admixtures on the rheological properties of fresh cement paste: A review. J Build Eng 51: 104313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104313. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104313
[35]	El-Fekyl MS, Youssef P, El-Tair AM, et al. (2019) Effect of nano silica addition on enhancing the performance of cement composites reinforced with nano cellulose fibers. AIMS Mater Sci 6: 864–883. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2018.6.864. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.6.864
[36]	Golewski GL (2023) Combined effect of coal fly ash (CFA) and nanosilica (nS) on the strength parameters and microstructural properties of eco-friendly concrete. Energies 16: 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010452 doi: 10.3390/en16010452
[37]	Papatzani S, Paine K (2019) Optimization of low-carbon footprint quaternary and quinary (37% fly ash) cementitious nanocomposites with polycarboxylate or aqueous nanosilica particles. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2019: 5931306. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5931306 doi: 10.1155/2019/5931306
[38]	British Standards Institution (BSI) (2013) Tests for mechanical and physical properties of aggregates. Part 6: determination of particle density and water absorption. EN 1097-6: 2013.
[39]	Zhang P, Gao JX, Dai XB, et al. (2016) Fracture behavior of fly ash concrete containing silica fume. Struct Eng Mech 59: 261–275. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.59.2.261 doi: 10.12989/sem.2016.59.2.261
[40]	Zhang P, Wan J, Wang K, et al. (2017) Influence of nano-SiO₂ on properties of fresh and hardened high performance concrete: A state-of-the-art review. Constr Build Mater 148: 648–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.059 doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.059
[41]	British Standards Institution (BSI) (2012) Testing hardened concrete—Part 3: Compressive strength of test specimens. EN 12390-3: 2011+AC.
[42]	British Standards Institution (BSI) (2009) Testing hardened concrete—Part 6: Tensile splitting strenght of test specimens. EN 12390-6: 2009.
[43]	Golewski GL (2022) Fracture performance of cementitious composites based on quaternary blended cements. Materials 15: 6023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15176023 doi: 10.3390/ma15176023
[44]	Bu J, Xu H, Wu X, et al. (2022) Experimental study on fracture properties of dam concrete under post-peak cyclic loading based on DIC and acoustic emission techniques. Fat Fract Eng Mater Struct 45: 2646–2661. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.13779 doi: 10.1111/ffe.13779
[45]	Golewski GL (2023) The phenomenon of cracking in cement concretes and reinforced concrete structures: The mechanism of cracks formation, causes of their initiation, types and places of occurrence, and methods of detection—A review. Buildings 13: 765. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13030765 doi: 10.3390/buildings13030765
[46]	Wardach M, Krentowski JR, Mackiewicz M (2022) Evaluation of precast beam defletions resulting in cracks in curtain walls. Eng Fail Anal 140: 106568. https://doi.org/10.1016/engfailanal.2022.106568 doi: 10.1016/engfailanal.2022.106568
[47]	Zhang S, Han B, Xie H, et al. (2021) Brittleness of concrete under different curing conditions. Materials 14: 7865. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247865 doi: 10.3390/ma14247865
[48]	Jenq Y, Shah SP (1985) Two parameter fracture model for concrete. J Eng Mech 111: 1227–1241. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1985)111:10(1227) doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1985)111:10(1227)
[49]	Raphael JM (1984) Tensile strength of concrete. ACI Mater J 81: 158–165. https://doi.org/10.14359/10653 doi: 10.14359/10653
[50]	Oluokun FA (1991) Prediction of concrete tensile strength from compressive strength: evaluation of existing relations for normal weight concrete. ACI Mater J 88: 302–309. https://doi.org/10.14359/1942 doi: 10.14359/1942
[51]	Zhou F, Meng H, Pan G, et al. (2022) Influence of CSH grown in situ on steel slag powder on the performance of fresh and hardened cement pastes. Constr Build Mater 344: 128269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125653 doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125653
[52]	Li H, Xiang Y, Xu C (2022) Effect of C-S-H seed/PCE nanocmposites and triisopropanolamine on Portland cement properties: Hydration kinetic and strength. J Build Eng 57: 104946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104466 doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104466
[53]	Ho DWS, Lewis RK (1985) Effectiveness of fly ash for strength and durability of concrete. Cem Concr Res 15: 793–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(85)90145-0 doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(85)90145-0
[54]	Fraay ALA, Bijen JM, de Haan YM (1989) The reaction of fly ash in concrete. A critical examination. Cem Concr Res 19: 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(89)90088-4 doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(89)90088-4
[55]	Heba AA (2021) A summary on the use of fly ash as a partial replacement material for cement in concrete. UKH J Sci Eng 5: 72–80. https://doi.org/10.25079/ukhjse.v5n2y2021.pp72-80 doi: 10.25079/ukhjse.v5n2y2021.pp72-80
[56]	Li Y, Wu B, Wang R (2022) Critical review and gap analysis on the use of high-volume fly ash as a substitute constituent in concrete. Constr Build Mater 341: 127889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127889 doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127889
[57]	Zhang MH (1995) Microstructure, crack propagation and mechanical properties of cement pastes containing high volumes of fly ashes. Cem Concr Res 25: 1165–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(95)00109-P doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00109-P
[58]	Deng Y, Yan C, Zhang J, et al. (2022) Preparation and mechanical characterization of engineered cementitious composites with high-volume fly ash and waste glass powder. J Clean Prod 333: 130222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130222 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130222
[59]	Torrence CE, Trageser JE, Jones RE, et al. (2022) Sensivity of the strength and toughness of concrete to the properties of the interfacial transition zone. Constr Build Mater 336: 126875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126875 doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126875
[60]	Lam L, Wong YL, Poon CS (1998) Effect of fly ash and silica fume on compressive and fracture behaviors of concrete. Cem Concr Res 28: 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(97)00269-X doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(97)00269-X
[61]	Atis CD (2005) Strength properties of high-volume fly ash roller compacted and workable concrete, and influence of curing condition. Cem Concr Res 35: 1112–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.07.037 doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.07.037
[62]	Elshekh AEA, Shafiq N, Nuruddin MF, et al. (2013) Mechanical properties of high strength concrete using fly ash. 2013 IEEE Business Engineering and Industrial Applications Colloqium (BEIAC), 306–310. https://doi.org/10.1109/BEIAC.2013.6560137 doi: 10.1109/BEIAC.2013.6560137

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)