Workforce mobility in the European Union (EU) has faced enormous challenges regarding the outbreak of Covid-19 in 2020. Member-states reacted by imposing border closures and eliciting travel restrictions and sanitary measures, some of which continued well into 2022, with far-reaching consequences in all areas of mobility experience. In a time of constant changes in the regulations of the internal market, the work of labour market intermediaries deserves special attention. Recent studies have shown that, being a relatively new EU member-state, Bulgaria managed to develop an important migration industry comprising a complex network of public and private actors. We focus on an interpretative analysis of ten in-depth interviews conducted in 2017 with practitioners working in such agencies, and ten follow-up interviews five years later. The comparative analysis of these intermediaries' reflections on the mobility policies and practices before and during the pandemic allows us to examine the processes of structural and functional adaptation in the industry in multiple dimensions: assessment of changes in mobility practices, perceptions of employers' and migrants' needs and expectations, and the challenges facing their agencies vis-à-vis the role of other actors in the field. The conclusion underlines trends and transformations which are of interest for the developing recruitment sectors in other Central and East European countries, as well as for the dynamics of the East-West labour mobility throughout the entire EU.
Citation: Boris Popivanov, Siyka Kovacheva. Revisiting European migration industries amid the Covid-19 pandemic: Changes in the recruiting practices of Bulgarian agencies[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2023, 9(2): 409-425. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2023022
Workforce mobility in the European Union (EU) has faced enormous challenges regarding the outbreak of Covid-19 in 2020. Member-states reacted by imposing border closures and eliciting travel restrictions and sanitary measures, some of which continued well into 2022, with far-reaching consequences in all areas of mobility experience. In a time of constant changes in the regulations of the internal market, the work of labour market intermediaries deserves special attention. Recent studies have shown that, being a relatively new EU member-state, Bulgaria managed to develop an important migration industry comprising a complex network of public and private actors. We focus on an interpretative analysis of ten in-depth interviews conducted in 2017 with practitioners working in such agencies, and ten follow-up interviews five years later. The comparative analysis of these intermediaries' reflections on the mobility policies and practices before and during the pandemic allows us to examine the processes of structural and functional adaptation in the industry in multiple dimensions: assessment of changes in mobility practices, perceptions of employers' and migrants' needs and expectations, and the challenges facing their agencies vis-à-vis the role of other actors in the field. The conclusion underlines trends and transformations which are of interest for the developing recruitment sectors in other Central and East European countries, as well as for the dynamics of the East-West labour mobility throughout the entire EU.
| [1] | European Commission, Guidelines concerning the exercise of the free movement of workers during COVID-19 outbreak, 2020. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri = CELEX%3A52020XC0330%2803%29. |
| [2] | Lynggaard K, Jensen M, Kluth M (2022) Governments' responses to the Covid-19 pandemic in Europe: Navigating the Perfect Storm, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. |
| [3] |
Alfano V, Ercolano S, Pinto M (2022) Fighting the COVID pandemic: National policy choices in non-pharmaceutical interventions. J Policy Model 1: 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2021.11.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2021.11.003
|
| [4] | Gammeltoft-Hansen T, Nyberg-Sørensen N (2013) The migration industry and the commercialization of international migration, London and New York: Routledge. |
| [5] |
McCollum D, Findlay A (2018) Oiling the wheels? Flexible labour markets and the migration industry. J Ethn Migr Stud 44: 558–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1315505 doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1315505
|
| [6] |
Tagliacozzo S, Pisacane L, Kilkey M (2021) The interplay between structural and systemic vulnerability during the COVID-19 pandemic: Migrant agricultural workers in informal settlements in Southern Italy. J Ethn Migr Stud 47: 1903–1921. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1857230 doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2020.1857230
|
| [7] |
Szytniewski B, van der Haar M (2022) Mobility power in the migration industry: Polish workers' trajectories in the Netherlands. J Ethn Migr Stud 48: 4694–4711. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2022.2061931 doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2022.2061931
|
| [8] |
Shubin S, McCollum D (2021) Migrant subjectivities and temporal flexibility of East-Central European labour migration to the United Kingdom. Popul Space Place 27: e2508. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2508 doi: 10.1002/psp.2508
|
| [9] | Maeva M, Zahova S (2013) Ethography of migrations: Bulgarians in the Mediterranean, Sofia: Paradigma. |
| [10] | Minchev V, Markova E, Misheva M, et al. (2012) Bulgarian emigration: theories, policies, empirical studies. Sofia: IKOPIS. |
| [11] | Rangelova R, Vladimirova K (2004) Migration from central and eastern Europe: the case of Bulgaria. South-East Eur Rev Labour Soc Affairs 3: 7–30. |
| [12] | Vladimirova K (2020) Migration and Economic Development: Opportunities and Challenges for Bulgaria. Naselenie 3: 93–115. |
| [13] |
Alfano V, Capasso S, Goel RK (2021) EU accession: A boon or bane for corruption? J Econ Finan 45: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-020-09522-8 doi: 10.1007/s12197-020-09522-8
|
| [14] | Charron N, Lapuente V, Bauhr M (2021) Sub-national Quality of Government in EU Member States: Presenting the 2021 European Quality of Government Index and its relationship with Covid-19 indicators. Gothenburg: QoG. Available from: https://www.gu.se/sites/default/files/2021-05/2021_4_%20Charron_Lapuente_Bauhr.pdf. |
| [15] |
Dorn D, Zweimüller J (2021) Migration and labor market integration in Europe. J Econ Persp 35: 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.35.2.49 doi: 10.1257/jep.35.2.49
|
| [16] | Garrote Sanchez D, Kreuder J, Testaverde M (2021) Migration in Bulgaria: Current Challenges and Opportunities. Discussion Paper 2109. Washington DC: The World Bank. Available from: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/914401640249485571/pdf/Migration-in-Bulgaria-Current-Challenges-and-Opportunities.pdf. |
| [17] | National Statistical Institute of the Republic of Bulgaria, Migration and migration behaviour: Sample survey accompanying Census 2021, 2023. Available from: https://www.nsi.bg/sites/default/files/files/pressreleases/Census2021_Migration_SampleSurvey.pdf. |
| [18] |
Kovacheva S, Popivanov B, Burcea M (2019) (Self-) Reflecting on International Recruitment: Views on the Role of Recruiting Agencies in Bulgaria and Romania. Soc Inclusion 7: 49–59. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i4.2287 doi: 10.17645/si.v7i4.2287
|
| [19] |
Salt J, Stein J (1997) Migration as a Business: The Case of Trafficking. Int Migr 35: 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2435.00023 doi: 10.1111/1468-2435.00023
|
| [20] | Castles S, Miller M (2003) The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World, Third Edition, New York: The Guilford Press. |
| [21] | Faist T (2014) Brokerage in Cross-Border Mobility: Social Mechanisms and the (Re)Production of Social Inequalities. Soc Incl 4: 38–52. |
| [22] | Cranston S (2018) Calculating the migration industries: Knowing the successful expatriate in the global mobility industry. J Ethn Migr Stud 4: 626–643. |
| [23] | Sporton D (2013) 'They control my life': The role of local recruitment agencies in East European migration to the UK. Pop Space Place 5: 443–458. |
| [24] | Jones K (2014) 'It was a whirlwind. A lot of people made a lot of money': The role of agencies in facilitating migration from Poland into the UK between 2004 and 2008. Central East Eur Migr Rev 2: 105–125. |
| [25] |
Seale H, Dyer CEF, Abdi I, et al. (2020) Improving the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: examining the factors that influence engagement and the impact on individuals. BMC Infect Dis 20: 607. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05340-9 doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05340-9
|
| [26] | Maloney W, Taskin T (2020) Determinants of Social Distancing and Economic Activity during COVID-19: A Global View. Policy Research Working Paper 9242. Washington, DC: The World Bank. |
| [27] |
Kantor BN, Kantor J (2020) Non-pharmaceutical interventions for pandemic COVID-19: a cross-sectional investigation of US general public beliefs, attitudes, and actions. Front Med 7: 384. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00384 doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00384
|
| [28] |
Dryhurst S, Schneider CR, Kerr J, et al. (2020) Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world. J Risk Res 23: 994–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1758193 doi: 10.1080/13669877.2020.1758193
|
| [29] |
Gauvin L, Bajardi P, Pepe E, et al. (2021) Socio-economic determinants of mobility responses during the first wave of COVID-19 in Italy: from provinces to neighbourhoods. J R Soc Interface 18: 20210092. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2021.0092 doi: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0092
|
| [30] | Grasso M, Klicperová-Baker M, Koos S, et al. (2021) The impact of the coronavirus crisis on European societies. What have we learnt and where do we go from here? Eur Soc 23: S2–S32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1869283 |
| [31] | Fasani F, Mazza J (2020) A vulnerable workforce: migrant workers in the COVID-19 pandemic. Luxembourg: EC Publications Office. Available from: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/316665 |
| [32] |
Ulceluse M, Bender F (2022) Two-tier EU citizenship: Disposable Eastern European workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Organization 3: 449–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084211061229 doi: 10.1177/13505084211061229
|
| [33] | Deneva N (2021) Essential Workers with Dangerous Bodies: The COVID-19 Crisis and East European Migrants. Soc Probl 2: 538–560. |
| [34] | Brändle V (2022) Well Informed? EU Governments' Digital Information Campaigns for (Potential) Migrants. J Immigr Refug Stud. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2022.2046896 |
| [35] |
Collins F (2021) Geographies of migration I: Platform migration. Prog Hum Geog 45: 866–877. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520973445 doi: 10.1177/0309132520973445
|
| [36] | Hooper K (2022) Reassessing Recruitment Costs in a Changing World of Labor Migration. Policy Brief. Washington: Migration Policy Institute. |
| [37] |
Leiblfinger M, Prieler V, Rogoz M, et al. (2021) Confronted with COVID-19: Migrant live-in care during the pandemic. Global Soc Policy 21: 490–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181211008340 doi: 10.1177/14680181211008340
|
| [38] | Heindlmaier A, Kobler C (2022) Essential, lonely and exploited: why mobile EU workers' labour rights are not enforced. J Ethn Migr Stud, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2022.2102971 |
| [39] | Faraday F (2021) The Empowerment of Migrant Workers in a Precarious Situation: An overview. World Bank, Washington, DC. Available from: https://www.knomad.org/sites/default/files/2021-12/KNOMAD%20Working%20Paper%2039-Empowerment%20of%20Worker-Dec%202021.pdf |
| [40] | Ortlieb R, Weiss S (2018) How do labor market intermediaries help young Eastern Europeans find work? Youth Labor in Transition: Inequalities, Mobility, and Policies in Europe, New York: Oxford Academic, 443–460. |
| [41] |
Iossa A, Selberg N (2022) Socio-Legal Aspects of Labour Market Segmentation in the Agri-Food Sector in Sweden: Spatio-Temporal Dimensions. Eur J Migr Law 24: 241–264. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12340128 doi: 10.1163/15718166-12340128
|
| [42] |
Blauberger M, Grabbe C, Servent A (2023) EU free movement of people: fully recovered or suffering from long COVID? J Eur Public Policy 30: 696–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2140818 doi: 10.1080/13501763.2022.2140818
|
| [43] | Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Chicago, IL: Aldine. |
| [44] | Kovacheva S, Popivanov B (2021) On the Road. Migration in the Lived Experiences of Bulgarian Migrants in the EU, Sofia: St. Kliment Ohridski University Press. |
| [45] | Hooper K, Benton M (2022) The Future of Remote Work: Digital Nomads and the Implications for Immigration Systems. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute. Available from: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/publications/mpi-remote-work-2022_final.pdf. |
Boris Popivanov, Siyka Kovacheva. Revisiting European migration industries amid the Covid-19 pandemic: Changes in the recruiting practices of Bulgarian agencies[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2023, 9(2): 409-425. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2023022
DownLoad: