For several years, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has insisted on the need to invest in new technologies to improve the procedures for the identification, reception and redistribution of asylum seekers around the world. United Nations experts have promoted new forms of digital inclusion aimed at both asylum seekers and displaced persons. They consider digital tools to be essential for achieving one of the UN Sustainable Development Goals: Target 16.9, which by 2030 intends to provide legal identity for all, including birth registration. Biometrics have been used on an experimental basis since the early 2000s to create digital identities in the humanitarian space for those vulnerable persons without traditional identity documents. It is a divisive subject. The aim of this article is to consider, from a geopolitical perspective, if following the acceleration of the digital revolution caused by the pandemic it is possible to invest in technological tools to improve the processes of identification, redistribution and reception of asylum seekers and displaced persons while at the same time respecting their privacy and freedoms. This hypothesis would signal the emergence of a geography of receiving asylum seekers on a global scale based not only on the governance of territory and borders, but also on platform governance.
Citation: Giuseppe Terranova. The new geography of asylum: digital identity, artificial intelligence and blockchain[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2022, 8(3): 385-397. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2022022
For several years, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has insisted on the need to invest in new technologies to improve the procedures for the identification, reception and redistribution of asylum seekers around the world. United Nations experts have promoted new forms of digital inclusion aimed at both asylum seekers and displaced persons. They consider digital tools to be essential for achieving one of the UN Sustainable Development Goals: Target 16.9, which by 2030 intends to provide legal identity for all, including birth registration. Biometrics have been used on an experimental basis since the early 2000s to create digital identities in the humanitarian space for those vulnerable persons without traditional identity documents. It is a divisive subject. The aim of this article is to consider, from a geopolitical perspective, if following the acceleration of the digital revolution caused by the pandemic it is possible to invest in technological tools to improve the processes of identification, redistribution and reception of asylum seekers and displaced persons while at the same time respecting their privacy and freedoms. This hypothesis would signal the emergence of a geography of receiving asylum seekers on a global scale based not only on the governance of territory and borders, but also on platform governance.
| [1] |
Weitzberg K, Cheesman M, Martin A, et al. (2021) Between surveillance and recognition: rethinking digital identity in aid. Big Data Soc. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211006744 doi: 10.1177/20539517211006744
|
| [2] | Bassetti P (2020) Oltre lo specchio di Alice. Governare l'innovazione nel cambiamento d'epoca. Milano: Guerrini & Associati. |
| [3] | Bassetti P, Corna-Pellegrini G (1959) Le redini del potere. Milano: Ceschina. |
| [4] |
Benhabib S (2020) The End of the 1951 Refugee Convention? Dilemmas of Sovereignty, Territoriality, and Human Rights. Jus Cogens 2: 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42439-020-00022-1 doi: 10.1007/s42439-020-00022-1
|
| [5] | Grandi F (2018) UNHCR chief Grandi: how business can help solve refugee crisis. Available from: https://www.ft.com/content/4287cbfc-b744-11e8-a1d8-15c2dd1280ff. |
| [6] | Bolaffi G, Terranova G (2019) Immigrazione. Cause, problemi, soluzioni. Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica. |
| [7] | Ramji-Nogales J (2011) Refugee roulette: disparities in asylum adjudication and proposals reform. New York: New York University Press. |
| [8] | Hathaway J, Neve RA (1997) Making international refugee law relevant again: a proposal for collectivized and solution-oriented protection. Harv Hum Rts J 10: 115–211. |
| [9] | Pagnini MP, Terranova G (2020) Un mondo disordinario tra Medioevo e Nuovo Rinascimento. Un virus sconvolge la geopolitica e oltre. Roma: Aracne. |
| [10] | Casswell J (2019) The digital lives of refugees: how displaced populations use mobile phones and what gets in the way. Available from: https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/blog/the-digital-lives-of-refugees-how-displaced-populations-use-mobile-phones-and-what-gets-in-the-way/. |
| [11] | UNHCR (2018) From ProGres to PRIMES. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/blogs/wp-content/uploads/sites/48/2018/03/2018-03-16-PRIMES-Flyer.pdf. |
| [12] | UNHCR (2018) Strategy on digital identity and inclusion. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/blogs/wp-content/uploads/sites/48/2018/03/2018-02-Digital-Identity_02.pdf. |
| [13] | European Commission (2019) Europe's digital decade: digital targets for 2030. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/europes-digital-decade-digital-targe ts-2030_en. |
| [14] |
Madon S, Schoemaker E (2021) Digital identity as a platform for improving refugee management. Inf Syst J 31: 929–953. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12353 doi: 10.1111/isj.12353
|
| [15] | Khanna P (2016) Connectography: mapping the future of global civilizations. New York: Random House. |
| [16] | Tyler H (2022) The increasing use of artificial intelligence in border zones prompts privacy questions. Available from: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/artificial-intelligence-border-zones-privacy. |
| [17] |
Cheesman M (2020) Self-sovreignity for refugees? The contested horizons of digital identity. Geopolitics 27: 134–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1823836 doi: 10.1080/14650045.2020.1823836
|
| [18] | UNHCR (2018) Bridging the identity divide. Is portable user-centric identity management the answer. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/blogs/bridging-identity-divide-portable-user-centric-identity-management-answer/. |
| [19] | ICRW (2016) Reaching refugees survivors of gender-based violence: evaluation of a mobile approach to service delivery in Lebanon. Available from: https://www.icrw.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/ICRW-Mobile-Services-Assessment-IRC_4pager.pdf. |
| [20] | Allen C (2016) The path to self-sovereign identity. Available from: http://www.lifewithalacrity.com/2016/04/the-path-to-self-soverereign-identity.html. |
| [21] | Gorey C (2016) Irish start-up Aid: Tech using blockchain to distribute aid in refugee camps. Available from: https://www.siliconrepublic.com/start-ups/aidtech-refugee-camps-blockchain. |
| [22] | Scheel S (2019) Autonomy of migration? Appropriating mobility within biometric border regimes. London: Routledge. |
| [23] | Arendt-Cassetta L (2021) From digital promise to frontline practice: new and emerging technologies in humanitarian action. New York: OCHA. |
| [24] |
Terranova G (2020) Geopolitics of Covid-19: global challenge at national borders. AIMS Geosci 4: 515–524. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2020029 doi: 10.3934/geosci.2020029
|
Giuseppe Terranova. The new geography of asylum: digital identity, artificial intelligence and blockchain[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2022, 8(3): 385-397. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2022022
DownLoad: