
For the p-Laplace Dirichlet problem (where φ(t)=t|t|p−2, p>1)
φ(u′(x))′+f(u(x))=0for−1<x<1,u(−1)=u(1)=0
assume that f′(u)>(p−1)f(u)u>0 for u>γ>0, while ∫γuf(t)dt<0 for all u∈(0,γ). Then any positive solution, with max(−1,1)u(x)=u(0)>γ, is non-singular, no matter how many times f(u) changes sign on (0,γ). The uniqueness of solution follows.
Citation: Philip Korman. Non-singular solutions of p-Laplace problems, allowing multiple changes of sign in the nonlinearity[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(4): 1414-1418. doi: 10.3934/era.2022073
[1] | Liangying Miao, Man Xu, Zhiqian He . Existence and multiplicity of positive solutions for one-dimensional $ p $-Laplacian problem with sign-changing weight. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(6): 3086-3096. doi: 10.3934/era.2023156 |
[2] | Xinguang Zhang, Yongsheng Jiang, Lishuang Li, Yonghong Wu, Benchawan Wiwatanapataphee . Multiple positive solutions for a singular tempered fractional equation with lower order tempered fractional derivative. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(3): 1998-2015. doi: 10.3934/era.2024091 |
[3] | Zhiwei Hao, Huiqin Zheng . Existence and multiplicity of solutions for fractional $ p(x) $-Kirchhoff-type problems. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(6): 3309-3321. doi: 10.3934/era.2023167 |
[4] | Zongming Guo, Fangshu Wan . Weighted fourth order elliptic problems in the unit ball. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(6): 3775-3803. doi: 10.3934/era.2021061 |
[5] | Yin Yang, Sujuan Kang, Vasiliy I. Vasil'ev . The Jacobi spectral collocation method for fractional integro-differential equations with non-smooth solutions. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28(3): 1161-1189. doi: 10.3934/era.2020064 |
[6] | Jiayi Fei, Qiongfen Zhang . On solutions for a class of Klein–Gordon equations coupled with Born–Infeld theory with Berestycki–Lions conditions on $ \mathbb{R}^3 $. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(4): 2363-2379. doi: 10.3934/era.2024108 |
[7] | Zaitao Liang, Xiuqiang Zhang, Shengjun Li, Ziqing Zhou . Periodic solutions of a class of indefinite singular differential equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(4): 2139-2148. doi: 10.3934/era.2023110 |
[8] | Limin Guo, Weihua Wang, Cheng Li, Jingbo Zhao, Dandan Min . Existence results for a class of nonlinear singular $ p $-Laplacian Hadamard fractional differential equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(2): 928-944. doi: 10.3934/era.2024045 |
[9] | Mufit San, Seyma Ramazan . A study for a higher order Riemann-Liouville fractional differential equation with weakly singularity. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(5): 3092-3112. doi: 10.3934/era.2024141 |
[10] | Jingyue Cao, Yunkang Shao, Fangshu Wan, Jiaqi Wang, Yifei Zhu . Nonradial singular solutions for elliptic equations with exponential nonlinearity. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(5): 3171-3201. doi: 10.3934/era.2024146 |
For the p-Laplace Dirichlet problem (where φ(t)=t|t|p−2, p>1)
φ(u′(x))′+f(u(x))=0for−1<x<1,u(−1)=u(1)=0
assume that f′(u)>(p−1)f(u)u>0 for u>γ>0, while ∫γuf(t)dt<0 for all u∈(0,γ). Then any positive solution, with max(−1,1)u(x)=u(0)>γ, is non-singular, no matter how many times f(u) changes sign on (0,γ). The uniqueness of solution follows.
We consider positive solutions of
φ(u′(x))′+f(u(x))=0for−1<x<1,u(−1)=u(1)=0, | (1) |
where φ(t)=t|t|p−2, p>1, so that φ′(t)=(p−1)|t|p−2. The linearized problem is
(φ′(u′(x))w′(x))′+f′(u(x))w(x)=0for -1 < x < 1 ,w(−1)=w(1)=0. | (2) |
Recall that any positive solution of (1) is an even function u(−x)=u(x), satisfying xu′(x)<0 for x≠0 so that max(−1,1)u(x)=u(0), and that any non-trivial solution of (2) is of one sign, so that we may assume that w(x)>0 for x∈(−1,1), see e.g., P. Korman [5], [6].
If f′(u)>(p−1)f(u)u>0 for u>0, it is well known that any positive solution of (1) is non-singular, i.e., the problem (2) admits only the trivial solution w(x)≡0. Now suppose that f′(u)>(p−1)f(u)u>0 holds only for u>γ, for some γ>0. It turns out that positive solutions of (1), with maximum value greater than γ are still non-singular, provided that ∫γuf(t)dt<0 for all u∈(0,γ). The main result is stated next. It is customary to denote F(u)=∫u0f(t)dt.
Theorem 1. Assume that f(u)∈C1(ˉR+), and for some γ>0 it satisfies
f(γ)=0,andf(u)>0on(γ,∞), | (3) |
f′(u)>(p−1)f(u)u,foru>γ, | (4) |
F(γ)−F(u)=∫γuf(t)dt<0,foru∈(0,γ). | (5) |
Then any positive solution of (1), satisfying
u(0)>γ,andu′(1)<0, | (6) |
is non-singular, which means that the linearized problem (2) admits only the trivial solution.
In case p=2 this result was proved in P. Korman [7], while for general p>1 a weaker result, requiring that f(u)<0 on (0,γ), was given in J. Cheng [3] (and before that by R. Schaaf [10] for p=2 case), see also P. Korman [5], [6] for a different proof, and a more detailed description of the solution curve. Other multiplicity results on p-Laplace equations include [1], [2], [4] and [9].
Proof: Assume, on the contrary, that the problem (2) admits a non-trivial solution w(x)>0. Let x0∈(0,1) denote the point where u(x0)=γ. Define
q(x)=(p−1)(1−x)φ(u′(x))+φ′(u′(x))u(x). |
We claim that
q(x0)<0. | (7) |
Rewrite (using that (p−1)φ(t)=tφ′(t))
q(x)=φ′(u′(x))[(1−x)u′(x)+u(x)]. |
Since φ′(t)>0 for all t≠0, it suffices to show that the function z(x)≡(1−x)u′(x)+u(x)<0 satisfies z(x0)<0. Indeed,
z(x0)=∫1x0[u′(x0)−u′(x)]dx<0, |
which implies the desired inequality (7), provided we can prove that
u′(x0)−u′(x)<0,forx∈(x0,1). | (8) |
The "energy" function E(x)=p−1p|u′(x)|p+F(u(x)) is seen by differentiation to be a constant, so that E(x)=E(x0), or
p−1p|u′(x)|p+F(u(x))=p−1p|u′(x0)|p+F(γ),forallx. |
By the assumption (5), it follows that
p−1p[|u′(x)|p−|u′(x0)|p]=F(γ)−F(u(x))<0,forx∈(x0,1), |
justifying (8), and then giving (7).
Next, we claim that
(p−1)w(x0)φ(u′(x0))−u(x0)w′(x0)φ′(u′(x0))>0, | (9) |
which implies, in particular, that
w′(x0)<0. | (10) |
Indeed, by a direct computation, using (1) and (2),
[(p−1)w(x)φ(u′(x))−u(x)w′(x)φ′(u′(x))]′=[f′(u)−(p−1)f(u)u]uw. |
The quantity on the right is positive on (0,x0), in view of our condition (4). Integration over (0,x0), gives (9).
We have for all x∈[−1,1]
φ′(u′)(u′w′−u″w)=constant=φ′(u′(1))u′(1)w′(1)>0, | (11) |
as follows by differentiation, and using the assumption u′(1)<0. Hence
u′(x)w′(x)−u″(x)w(x)>0,forx∈(x0,1). | (12) |
Since f(u(x0))=0, it follows from Eq (1) that u″(x0)=0. Then (11) implies
φ′(u′(1))u′(1)w′(1)=φ′(u′(x0))u′(x0)w′(x0)=(p−1)φ(u′(x0))w′(x0). | (13) |
We need the following function, motivated by M. Tang [11] (which was introduced in P. Korman [5], and used in Y. An et al. [2])
T(x)=x[(p−1)φ(u′(x))w′(x)+f(u(x))w(x)]−(p−1)φ(u′(x))w(x). |
One verifies that
T′(x)=pf(u(x))w(x). | (14) |
Integrating (14) over (x0,1), and using (5) and (12), obtain
T(1)−T(x0)=p∫1x0f(u(x))w(x)dx |
=p∫1x0[F(u(x))−F(γ)]′w(x)u′(x)dx |
=−p∫1x0[F(u(x))−F(γ)]w′(x)u′(x)−w(x)u″(x)u′2(x)dx<0, |
which implies that
L≡(p−1)φ(u′(1))w′(1)−(p−1)x0φ(u′(x0))w′(x0)+(p−1)φ(u′(x0))w(x0)<0. |
On the other hand, using (13), then (9), followed by (10) and (7), we estimate the same quantity as follows
L>(p−1)φ(u′(x0))w′(x0)−(p−1)x0φ(u′(x0))w′(x0)+u(x0)w′(x0)φ′(u′(x0))=w′(x0)q(x0)>0, |
a contradiction.
We remark that in case f(0)<0 it is possible to have a singular positive solution with u′(1)=0, so that the assumption u′(1)<0 is necessary.
We now consider the problem (where φ(t)=t|t|p−2, p>1)
φ(u′(x))′+λf(u(x))=0for -1 < x < 1 ,u(−1)=u(1)=0, | (15) |
depending on a positive parameter λ. The following result follows the same way as the Theorem 3.1 in [5].
Theorem 2. Assume that f(u)∈C1(ˉR+), and the conditions (3), (4) and (5) hold. Then there exists 0<λ0≤∞ so that the problem (15) has a unique positive solution for 0<λ<λ0. All positive solutions, satisfying u(0)>γ, lie on a continuous solution curve that is decreasing in the (λ,u(0)) plane (see Figure 1). In case f(0)<0, one has λ0<∞, and at λ=λ0 a positive solution with u′(±1)=0 exists, and no positive solutions exist for λ>λ0. In case f(0)=0 and f′(0)<0, we have λ0=∞.
Example In Figure 1 we present the solution curve of the problem (15) in case p=3 and f(u)=u(u−1)(u−2)(u−4). Here γ=4, and one verifies that the Theorem 2 applies. The Mathematica program to perform numerical computations for this problem is explained in detail in [8] (it uses the shoot-and-scale method). The solution curve in Figure 1 exhausts the set of all positive solutions (since ∫20f(u)du<0, there are no solutions with u(0)=max(−1,1)u(x)∈(1,2)).
The author declares there is no conflicts of interest.
[1] |
A. Aftalion, F. Pacella, Uniqueness and nondegeneracy for some nonlinear elliptic problems in a ball, J. Differ. Equ., 195 (2003), 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0396(02)00194-8 doi: 10.1016/S0022-0396(02)00194-8
![]() |
[2] |
Y. An, C.-G. Kim, J. Shi, Exact multiplicity of positive solutions for a p-Laplacian equation with positive convex nonlinearity, J. Differ. Equ., 260 (2016), 2091–2118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2015.09.058 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2015.09.058
![]() |
[3] |
J. Cheng, Uniqueness results for the one-dimensional p-Laplacian, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 311 (2005), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.02.057 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.02.057
![]() |
[4] |
P. C. Huang, S. H. Wang, T. S. Yeh, Classification of bifurcation diagrams of a p-Laplacian nonpositone problem, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., 12 (2013), 2297–2318. https://doi.org/10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.2297 doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.2297
![]() |
[5] |
P. Korman, Existence and uniqueness of solutions for a class of p-Laplace equations on a ball, Adv. Nonlinear Stud., 11 (2011), 875–888. https://doi.org/10.1515/ans-2011-0406 doi: 10.1515/ans-2011-0406
![]() |
[6] | P. Korman, Global Solution Curves for Semilinear Elliptic Equations, World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1142/8308 |
[7] |
P. Korman, Non-singular solutions of two-point problems, with multiple changes of sign in the nonlinearity, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 144 (2016), 2539–2546. https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/12905 doi: 10.1090/proc/12905
![]() |
[8] | P. Korman, D. S. Schmidt, Continuation of global solution curves using global parameters, arXiv preprint, (2020), arXiv: 2001.00616. |
[9] | B. P. Rynne, A global curve of stable, positive solutions for a p-Laplacian problem, Electron. J. Differ. Equ., 58 (2010), 1–12. |
[10] | R. Schaaf, Global Solution Branches of Two Point Boundary Value Problems, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, no. 1458, Springer-Verlag, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0098346 |
[11] |
M. Tang, Uniqueness of positive radial solutions for Δu−u+up=0 on an annulus, J. Differ. Equ., 189 (2003), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0396(02)00142-0 doi: 10.1016/S0022-0396(02)00142-0
![]() |