Research article Special Issues

Regulation of gene expression in Nicotiana tabacum seedlings by the MKASAA peptide through DNA methylation via the RdDM pathway

  • DNA methylation is involved in the protection of the genome, the regulation of gene expression, splicing, and is associated with a serious reprogramming of plant development. Using fluorescence microscopy, it was shown that the MKASAA peptide penetrates through the root system of Nicotiana tabacum tobacco, mainly into the cap, meristem, and elongation zones. In the cell, the peptide is localized mainly on the nuclei. In tobacco seedlings grown in the presence of the peptide at a concentration of 10–7 M, an increase in the expression of DNA methyltransferases, especially DRM2, which methylates previously unmethylated DNA sites, is observed. In the presence of the peptide in the roots and leaves of tobacco, the level of global DNA methylation increases. An increase in DNA methylation occurs via the RdDM pathway. Presumably, the peptide binds to siRNAs, forming giant particles that remodulate chromatin and facilitate the entry of DNA methyltransferases. An increase in the level of DNA methylation is accompanied by silencing of the genes of the GRF, KNOX, and EXP families. Suppression of gene expression of these families is accompanied by significant morphological changes in tobacco seedlings. Thus, the short exogenous MKASAA peptide is involved in global morphological and genetic changes in tobacco seedlings.

    Citation: Larisa I. Fedoreyeva, Tatiana A. Dilovarova, Boris F. Vanyushin, Inna A. Chaban, Neonila V. Kononenko. Regulation of gene expression in Nicotiana tabacum seedlings by the MKASAA peptide through DNA methylation via the RdDM pathway[J]. AIMS Biophysics, 2022, 9(2): 113-129. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2022011

    Related Papers:

    [1] Larisa I. Fedoreyeva, Boris F. Vanyushin . Regulation of DNA methyltransferase gene expression by short peptides in nicotiana tabacum regenerants. AIMS Biophysics, 2021, 8(1): 66-79. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2021005
    [2] Larisa I. Fedoreyeva, Boris F. Vanyushin, Ekaterina N. Baranova . Peptide AEDL alters chromatin conformation via histone binding. AIMS Biophysics, 2020, 7(1): 1-16. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2020001
    [3] Raghvendra P Singh, Guillaume Brysbaert, Marc F Lensink, Fabrizio Cleri, Ralf Blossey . Kinetic proofreading of chromatin remodeling: from gene activation to gene repression and back. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(4): 398-411. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.4.398
    [4] Yun Chen, Bin Liu, Lei Guo, Zhong Xiong, Gang Wei . Enzyme-instructed self-assembly of peptides: Process, dynamics, nanostructures, and biomedical applications. AIMS Biophysics, 2020, 7(4): 411-428. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2020028
    [5] Mauro Mandrioli, Gian Carlo Manicardi . Cytosine methylation in insects: new routes for the comprehension of insect complexity. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(4): 412-422. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.4.412
    [6] Yohei Matsunaga, Tsuyoshi Kawano . The C. elegans insulin-like peptides (ILPs). AIMS Biophysics, 2018, 5(4): 217-230. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2018.4.217
    [7] Davood Norouzi, Ataur Katebi, Feng Cui, Victor B. Zhurkin . Topological diversity of chromatin fibers: Interplay between nucleosome repeat length, DNA linking number and the level of transcription. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(4): 613-629. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.4.613
    [8] Audrey Lejart, Gilles Salbert, Sébastien Huet . Cytosine hydroxymethylation by TET enzymes: From the control of gene expression to the regulation of DNA repair mechanisms, and back. AIMS Biophysics, 2018, 5(3): 182-193. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2018.3.182
    [9] J. Dandurand, E. Dantras, C. Lacabanne, A. Pepe, B. Bochicchio, V. Samouillan . Thermal and dielectric fingerprints of self-assembling elastin peptides derived from exon30. AIMS Biophysics, 2021, 8(3): 236-247. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2021018
    [10] Delores J. Grant, Leighcraft A. Shakes, Hope M. Wolf, Derek C. Norford, Pradeep K. Chatterjee . Exploring function of conserved non-coding DNA in its chromosomal context. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(4): 773-793. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.4.773
  • DNA methylation is involved in the protection of the genome, the regulation of gene expression, splicing, and is associated with a serious reprogramming of plant development. Using fluorescence microscopy, it was shown that the MKASAA peptide penetrates through the root system of Nicotiana tabacum tobacco, mainly into the cap, meristem, and elongation zones. In the cell, the peptide is localized mainly on the nuclei. In tobacco seedlings grown in the presence of the peptide at a concentration of 10–7 M, an increase in the expression of DNA methyltransferases, especially DRM2, which methylates previously unmethylated DNA sites, is observed. In the presence of the peptide in the roots and leaves of tobacco, the level of global DNA methylation increases. An increase in DNA methylation occurs via the RdDM pathway. Presumably, the peptide binds to siRNAs, forming giant particles that remodulate chromatin and facilitate the entry of DNA methyltransferases. An increase in the level of DNA methylation is accompanied by silencing of the genes of the GRF, KNOX, and EXP families. Suppression of gene expression of these families is accompanied by significant morphological changes in tobacco seedlings. Thus, the short exogenous MKASAA peptide is involved in global morphological and genetic changes in tobacco seedlings.



    Plants are exposed to the environment. In response to environmental influences, plants have evolved by changing gene expression without changing the original DNA sequence, creating a “memory process” that is defined as epigenetic. This epigenetic memory can be achieved through covalent modifications of nucleotides and chromatin, including DNA cytosine methylation, modification of basic histone proteins, RNA-mediated gene silencing, and chromatin remodeling [1]. Chromatin is a dynamic DNA-protein structure that can exist as transcriptionally permissive euchromatin or repressive heterochromatin. The structure of chromatin in eukaryotic organisms can change during growth and development, as well as in response to environmental influences. Chromatin remodeling controls important molecular processes such as gene transcription, replication, repair, and recombination [2].

    There are two main players that regulate chromatin dynamics: (1) chromatin remodelers, which alter DNA-histone interactions with energy derived from ATP hydrolysis, and (2) nucleosome-modifying enzymes, which modulate DNA and histone residues by specifically adding or removal of covalent modifications [3]. DNA methylation is usually associated with long-term gene silencing, while histone modifications promote both activation and repression of gene transcription and can be removed after several cell cycles [4],[5].

    Post-translational modification of histones plays a key role in the regulation of chromatin dynamics. Methylation of Lys residues in the H3 histone tail is a key regulator of chromatin state and gene expression, which is provided by a large family of enzymes containing the evolutionarily conserved SET domain. Transcriptionally active chromatins typically contain trimethylated histone H3K4 and highly acetylated histone H3 and H4. In contrast, transcriptionally silent chromatins are enriched in lysine 9 and/or 27 histone H3 methylation [6],[7].

    DNA methylation is the covalent modification of nucleotides in DNA. Methylation of eukaryotic DNA is carried out by DNA methyltransferases (DMT) enzymes, which transfer a methyl group from S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) to the cytosine carbon at the fifth position. These enzymes are classified into maintenance and de novo DMT, depending on whether the recognition site is already methylated or not. There are two types of maintaining DMT in plants: DNA methyltransferase (MET) and chromomethyltransferase (CMT) [8]. Plant genomes have three types of methylation sites: CG, CNG, and CNN [9], [10].

    Methylation of previously unmethylated DNA, de novo, is carried out by a family of DNA methyltransferases called DRM (Domains rearranged methyltransferases). DRMs are known to primarily methylate unsymmetrical CHH sites, (where H is any nucleotide except G), but are capable of de novo methylation of cytosines in any sequence context in a process called RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM). RdDM is a biological process in which non-coding RNA molecules direct the addition of DNA methylation to specific DNA sequences. The RdDM pathway is unique to plants. DNA methylation added by RdDM is usually associated with transcriptional repression of genetic sequences where de novo methylation occurs. [11].

    Since DNA methylation and repressive histone modifications together define heterochromatin, most DNA methylation pathways in plants recognize and interact with repressive histone marks and vice versa, forming positive feedback loops that help maintain the state of repressive chromatin [12]. Ultimately, the constant increase in silencing modifications of chromatin at heterochromatic loci creates a repressive chromatin state in which DNA and histones (nucleosomes) become densely packed together. This helps to suppress gene expression by blocking access to DNA, preventing transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II, transcription factors and other proteins [13].

    In addition to cellular regulation of chromatin dynamics, including modifications of DNA, histone tails, and nucleosome-binding proteins, its structure is affected by external stress factors such as temperature, drought, high salt concentration, and infection. RdDM helps plants respond to a number of abiotic stresses, such as heat stress, drought, phosphate starvation, salt stress, and others [14]. Many transposable element TEs are upregulated under conditions of abiotic stress [15],[16], and thus one of the functions of RdDM in response to stress is to help counteract this activation.

    Peptides play a key role in many physiological processes by coordinating developmental and environmental signals between different cells. Small peptides are important signaling molecules that coordinate comprehensive cell-to-cell communication in many aspects of plant development. Hormonal peptides play a crucial role in plant growth and development, including defense mechanisms in response to pest damage, control of cell division and expansion, and pollen incompatibility [17].

    The aim of this work was to study the regulation of DNA methyltransferase gene expression in tobacco by the MKASAA peptide, de nova DNA methylation, and the effect of de nova DNA methylation on the development of tobacco seedlings.

    Seeds of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) cultivar Samsun (collection variety of the Agricultural Academy of the Russian Federation) were placed in flasks containing hormone-free Murashige–Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with or without 10–7 M MKASAA. Experiments were carried out in four replicates. After 28 days, the seedling fresh weight, seedling height, and root length were evaluated [18]. The last parameter was measured under an Olympus BX51 microscope (Japan) furnished with the Cell program. The calculation of the main statistical parameters was carried out according to standard methods, and Statistica 6.0 and STATAN 2.0 programs for statistical data processing were used.

    Oligoribonucleotides and the MKASAA peptide were synthesized by Sintol LLC (Russia). The purity of the synthetic preparations was checked by chromatography on a BioLogic DuoFlow chromatograph on a C-18 column in a concentration gradient of acetonitrile (0–60%) containing 1% trifluoroacetic acid.

    A solution of FITC (1 µg in 10 µl of 0.5 M sodium bicarbonate) was added to a solution of MKASAA in 0.01 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.0) at a ratio of 1.2: 1 [18]. The reaction mixture was incubated at room temperature for 30 min with constant shaking. The obtained fluorescently labeled peptides were analyzed by chromatography on a BioLogic DuoFlow chromatograph on a C-18 column in a concentration gradient of acetonitrile (0–100%) containing 1% trifluoroacetic acid.

    To determine the localization of peptides in root cells, the FITC-labeled dipeptides and Gly were used at a concentration of 10–5 M; control FITC and FITC without peptides were used as controls [19]. The incubation time was 20 h. Root tips (4–5 mm) were excised from tobacco roots, and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for 1.5 h at room temperature. After three washes with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), the root tips were mounted on glass slides and embedded in Moviol. Fluorescence was analyzed at a wavelength of 490 nm using Olympus BX51 microscope (Japan) with 10X and 20X objective lens. Photographs were obtained using Color View digital camera (Germany) [20].

    Roots stained with FITC-labeled peptides were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in LRW, as described previously [20]. Then, semi-thin root sections (1,000 µm) were obtained using the LKB-III microtome (LKB, Sweden). Fluorescence was analyzed at a wavelength of 490 nm using Olympus BX51 microscope (Japan) with 10X and 20X objective lens. Photographs were captured using Color View digital camera (Germany). Photographs of root and determination of their length along the main root were taken with a digital camera Rising View (China).

    Fluorescence spectra were recorded using a PerkinElmer LS 55 spectrofluorometer (USA). Titration of FITC-labeled MKASAA with deoxyribooligonucleotides (oligos) was carried out as described in [21]. This allows us to use the Stern–Volmer constant to evaluate the binding of peptides to various oligos [22].

    The dynamic light scattering of samples at a concentration of 10–5 M was determined on a Zetaseizer Nano-zs “Malvern” instrument (UK).

    Total DNA was isolated from the roots and leaves of tobacco seedlings according to the standard DNA from tobacco regenerants was isolated using a standard method, utilizing a HigherPurity Plant DNA Purification Kit (Canvax, Spain). The purity of the preparations were determined by electrophoresis in 1% agarose. The mass of the obtained DNA was determined relative to DNA markers.

    Global DNA methylation status was determined using the MethylFlash Methylated DNA Quantification kit (Epigentek). Total DNA was sequentially processed by a complex of enzymes to mononucleotides. The mixture was further analyzed on a chromatography on a BioLogic DuoFlow chromatograph on a C-18 column in a concentration gradient of acetonitrile (0–100%) containing 1% trifluoroacetic acid. 5-methylcytosine was used as an internal standard.

    Total RNA was isolated from tobacco, from which root hairs were carefully removed, using RNA-Extran RNA isolation reagent kit (Syntol, Russia), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The concentration of isolated RNA preparations was determined on NanoPhotometer IMPLEN. Then, cDNA was obtained using a set of reverse transcription reagents (Syntol, Russia), according to the manufacturer's instructions.

    Table 1.  Primers of DNA methyltransferases for PCR-RT.
    Gene 5′-3′- sequence Accession Product length T °C Coding protein
    MET1B GAC CAC TTC TTC GCC AAA GC
    CGT CCT GAC CGA TAA GTT GCT
    XM_016594253.1 214 60 DNA (cytosine-5)
    methyltransferase 1B
    CMT3 TCA AGG AGA GAT GGG TCT GTT
    AGG CAG GTC CCT GAA GTT TG
    XM_016657676.1 117 59 DNA (cytosine-5)
    Methylate CNG sites in DNA
    CMT2 GCT GGT CGA AAA ACG AAG CG
    CCC ACCC TTT GGT GCT TGA TG
    XM_016644834.1 169 60 DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferase CMT2
    Methylate CNN sites in DNA
    DRM2 TGC TGG GTT TAG CCT GAT GG
    GGA ACT TGT TAG TTT CGC CCC
    XM_016644131.1 495 60 DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferase DRM2
    Methylate de nova CNN (CNG) sites in DNA

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Information on the primary structure of Nicotiana tabacum genes was obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Primers for these genes were designed using the NCBI Primer-BLAST web tool, and synthesized at Syntol (Table 1,2). Real-time PCR was performed on CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad) using a set of RT-PCR reagents and SYBR Green (Syntol). The relative expression level of genes was calculated using a calibration curve constructed with PCR products derived from the GAPDH gene. The calculation of the main statistical parameters was carried out according to STATAN program on a significance level p < 0.05.

    Table 2.  Primers of GRF, KNOX and EXPA for PCR-RT.
    Gene 5′-3′- sequence Accession Product length T°C Coding protein
    GRF1 CCC GGA TTC CCA ACT ACA CA
    AGC GCG TGT ACT TCA CTA CTT
    XM_009801132.1 135 59 DNA-(apurinic or apyrimidinic site) lyase 2-like
    GRF2 CAT CCA GCA GTG CAC AGA GA
    TGC AAG TCA ACT TCC TGA GAC
    XM_016651168.1 139 59 DNA topoisomerase 3- alpha-like
    GRF3 TAC GAA CTG TGA GGC ATC CG
    TTC ACC ACT CAA TGT GCC GT
    XM_009773209.1 157 60 3′-5′ exoribonuclease 1-like
    GRF4 GAC GAA GAG GAA GGC TTG GA
    GCC GTA CTC CCA TCA GCT TT
    XM_009768761.1 127 60 endonuclease 8-like 3
    KNAT1 CAA CTC AGC GAC CTC ATG GA
    TGT TCC CAT GGG CCT TCA TC
    XM_009803212.1 85 60 homeobox protein knotted-1 like 1
    KNAT2 CCA TAT TTT GGA TCG CCG CC
    CCG AAC ACA CCG ACG ACA TA
    XM_009774408.1 85 60 homeobox protein knotted-1 like 2
    KNAT3 CGT GTG AGG CAG GAG CTA AA
    AGT ATC GCC CGG GAG TTT TC
    XM_009786234.1 114 60 homeobox protein knotted-1 like 3
    KNAT6 GCT GTA GCA GAC GCG ATG AT
    GTC CTT CTA CCT CCC CAC AAC
    NM_001325327.1 396 60 homeobox protein knotted-1 like 6
    EXPA3 TGT CCA AAG TTG GTG TAA CAG GA
    TGA AGA TTG CAG CGT AGG CA
    NM_001325429.1 116 60 expansin 3
    EXPA5 GGC AAA ATG CTC ATG CCA CT
    ATG CAG CTC GTA ACA AGC CC
    XM_016599462.1 171 60 expansin 5

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    All experiments were repeated three or five times. The results of multiple experiments are presented as the mean ± SE. Statistical analysis was carried out using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by least significant difference (LSD) test. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered for a statistically significant result.

    The equipment of the Center for Collective Use of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution VNIISB RAS was used in this study.

    MKASAA peptide at a concentration of 10−7 M inhibits the growth and development of Nicotiana tabacum seedlings (Figure 1).

    Figure 1.  Seedlings of Nicotiana tabacum (28 days) grown without peptides (control) and in the presence of MKASAA at a concentration of 10–7 M.

    This is confirmed by morphometric parameters such as seedling weight, main root length and seedling height (Table 3). Thus, under the action of histone, the fresh weight of seedlings is reduced by 4 times, and the height of seedlings and the length of the main root by 1.5–1.8 times, respectively.

    Table 3.  Effect of the MKASAA peptide on the morphometric characteristics of tobacco seedlings Nicotiana tabacum.
    Variant Weight, g Short height, mm Root length, mm
    Control 11.10 ± 0.55 42 ± 2.5 35 ± 1.7
    MKASAA 2.65 ± 0.16 27 ± 1.3 19 ± 1.1

    Mean ± standard error (n = 30). Standard deviations are shown according to Student's criterion, p < 0.05.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In tobacco roots treated with free FITC a slight luminescence is visible, mainly in the cells of the epidermis (Figure 2). Free FITC concentrates on the cell surface and does not penetrate inside. When tobacco roots were treated with FITC-MKASAA, luminescence was observed in the cap, meristem, and elongation zones. Moreover, the maximum glow is observed in the elongation zone. On a longitudinal semi-thin section, it can be seen that FITC-MKASAA penetrates the cell and concentrates mainly in the cell nucleus.

    Figure 2.  Visualization of FITC-labeled MKASAA in tobacco seedling roots. (ac) Control roots. (df) Roots incubated with FITC. (gi) Roots incubated with FITC-MKASAA. (jl). (a,d,j)- light microscopy; (b,e,h)- fluorescence microscopy; (c,f,i)- semi-thin root sections. Scale = 200 µm.

    Expression of genes from N. tabacum encoding cytosine DNA methyltransferases are shown in Figure 3. In seedlings tobacco grown in the presence of MKASAA peptide, the expression level of the cytosine DNA methyltransferases, are activated in all variants.

    Figure 3.  A -Relative gene expression of different DNA methyltransferase. Blue: control seedlings; orange: seedlings grown in the presence of peptide MKASAA. B -relative level of total methylation in the root and leaf tobacco (against control). The mean values and their standard deviations.

    The major DNA methyltransferase (DMT) MET1B methylates cytosine bases at the CG sites of DNA. This maintenance DMT methylates sites during replication. In tobacco seedlings grown in the presence of the peptide, MET1B gene expression increased by 1.8 times.

    DMT CMT3 provides downstream methylation of symmetric CNG sites. The relative level of expression of the CMT3 gene in tobacco seedlings is significantly higher than in the CMT2 and even MET1B genes. In seedlings grown in the presence of peptide, the expression of CMT3 genes increases in comparison with the control variant by approximately 30% (Figure 3). It is interesting to note that the relative level of CMT2 expression more than doubled in seedlings grown in the presence of the peptide.

    De novo methylation of previously unmethylated DNA is performed by DRM2. It is known that DRM2 mainly methylates asymmetrical CNN sites (N = everything except G) during RdDM. In tobacco seedlings grown in the presence of the MKASAA peptide, the expression level of the DRM2 gene encoding the cytosine DNA methyltransferase involved in de novo DNA methylation increases approximately in 5 times.

    It was determined that in the presence of the MKASAA peptide, there is an increase in the expression of genes for DNA methyltransferases, both maintaining and carrying out de novo methylation. This fact indicates that the level of DNA methylation must have increased. Indeed, from the data presented in Table 4 and in Figure 3B, it can be seen that the level of methylation in both roots and leaves of tobacco grown in the presence of the peptide is increased compared to control DNA samples.

    Table 4.  Total methylated cytosine content in tobacco DNA.
    Variant Total 5-mC
    Control Root 4.23±0.04
    Leaf 4.72±0.04
    +MKASAA Root 4.68±0.05
    Leaf 5.09±0.06

    Mean ± SE (n = 30). Standard deviations are shown according to Student's criterion, p < 0.05.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The content of 5-mC in the leaves is higher than in the roots both in the control and in tobacco grown in the presence of the peptide MKASAA.

    Methylation of previously unmethylated DNA de novo by the RdDM pathway can be divided into two steps. At the first stage, siRNAs (24 nucleotides) are formed as a result of the action of specific RNA polymerases, which were found only in plants. At the second stage of methylation along the RdDM pathway, small RNAs interact with proteins, including DNA methyltransferase DRM2 and lysine methyltransferases of the SUVH family.

    24 RNA with mono- and dinucleotide sequence were synthesized. Data on the interaction of FITC-MKASAA with synthetic oligoribonucleotides are presented in the Table 5.

    Table 5.  Binding constants of synthetic oligoribonucleotides to FITC-MKASAA.
    Oligoribonucleptide K, M
    AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA 2.1x10−4
    CCC CCC CCC CCC CCC CCC CCC CCC 2.8x10−3
    UUU UUU UUU UUU UUU UUU UUU UUU 1.9x10−3
    ACA CAC ACA CAC ACA CAC ACA CAC 4.1x10−3
    AGA GAG AGA GAG AGA GAG AGA GAG 3.7x10−3
    AUA UAU AUA UAU AUA UAU AUA UAU 3.1x10−3
    CUC UCU CUC UCU CUC UCU CUC UCU 1.6x10−3
    CGC GCG CGC GCG CGC GCG CGC GCG 1.1x10−3
    UGU GUG UGU GUG UGU GUG UGU GUG 1.2x10−3

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The binding of the oligos to the peptide MKASAA are carried out by ionic, electrostatic interactions with low constants. Oligos containing adenine bases bind to the peptide MKASAA with little advantage over other oligos used.

    The densitograms show the formation of giant particles with a maximum of up to 800 nm during the formation of a complex between the peptide and polyA. With polyAU, polyAС, and polyAG the particle size decreases to 100 nm, while with other oligos, the peptide forms even smaller particles (less than 100 nm).

    Figure 4.  Light scattering of samples at a concentration of 10−5 M: A -polyA; B -peptide MKASAA; C -polyA + MKASAA; D -polyAC (AG or AU) + MKASAA; E -polyC, U, CU, CG, or UG.

    The discovery of the physiological activity of the peptide MKASAA (inhibition of the growth and development of tobacco seedlings and its root system) prompted us to study the expression of some genes of the KNOX, and GRF families encoding transcription factors and responsible for cell differentiation, as well as the expansin gene family responsible for loosening of the root cell wall.

    Growth regulator factors (GRFs) in plants are specific transcription factors. The addition of the peptide MKASAA to the nutrient medium is accompanied by a slight decrease in the expression of the GRF genes from 12 to 15% (Figure 5A).

    KNOX genes encode transcription factors that are involved in the regulation of cell differentiation in the apical zone of the seedling. From the data in Figure 5B, it follows that a decrease in the level of expression of the KNOX family genes are observed only KNAT1 and KNAT2 by 15 and 20%, respectively. The KNAT3 and KNAT6 genes show an increase in the expression level in tobacco seedlings grown in the presence of the peptide MKASAA by 10 and 40%, respectively.

    Expansins are proteins that weaken intercellular interactions. They are involved in cell extension as well as various developmental processes that require cell wall modification.

    According to Figure 5C, the level of expression of EXPA3 and EXPA5 decreases in the seedlings of tobacco grown in the presence of the peptide MKASAA, especially EXPA3, by almost 2 times.

    Figure 5.  Relative gene expression of. A–GRF; B–KNOX; C–EXPA: Blue: control seedlings; orange: seedlings grown in the presence of peptide MKASAA.

    Peptides play a key role in many physiological processes by coordinating developmental and environmental signals between different cells. Small peptides are important signaling molecules that coordinate comprehensive cell-to-cell communication in many aspects of plant development. Hormonal peptides play a critical role in plant growth and development, including defense mechanisms in response to pest damage, control of cell division and expansion, and pollen incompatibility [17],[23].

    The MKASAA peptide is an C-terminal H1 histone peptide from Arabidopsis thaliana. The histone molecule consists of three parts: N-terminals, C-terminals and a globular region. The globular part is hydrophobic and is the most conserved part of the molecule for all histones [24]. It is known, that it is the terminal peptides of histones that are involved in the regulation of gene expression through dynamic changes in the structure of chromatin [25].

    Exogenous synthetic FITC-labeled MKASAA peptide penetrates into tobacco roots and, as follows from Figure 2, is mainly localized, in the nuclei of elongation zone cells. Localization of the labeled peptide on nuclei may prove that the peptide can bind to chromatin components and participate in the regulation of gene expression.

    One of the main participants that regulate the dynamics of the chromatin structure and, accordingly, regulate gene expression is DNA methyltransferases. In tobacco seedlings grown in the presence of the MKASAA peptide, an increase in the expression level of DNA methyltransferase genes, especially DRM2, is observed. This DNA methyltransferase methylates de novo CNN sites (where H = A, T, C) in all contexts. Asymmetric methylation (which lacks adjacent methylcytosine to provide epigenetic information after DNA replication) controlled by DNA methyltransferase DRM2 is associated with short nucleic acid interfering RNAs (siRNAs) produced by RNA interference pathways. Methylation in this way is characteristic of plants and is called RNA-directed DNA methylation RdDM [11].

    The first part of the RdDM pathway revolves around smallRNA biogenesis. This process involves a plant-specific RNA polymerase complex, RNA polymerase IV (Pol IV), which first binds to the CLASSY (CLSY) proteins, a chromatin remodeler and a homeodomain homolog SAWADI 1 (SHH1), which is a lysine methyltransferase [26][28]. In the second part of the RdDM DNA methylation pathway, complementary small RNAs are directed to DNA sequences. In this pathway, small RNAs bind to argonaut (AGO) proteins AGO4, AGO6, or AGO9 [29]. The formation of the complex leads to the recruitment of the enzyme DNA methyltransferase, (DRM2) [29],[30].

    The expression of DNA methyltransferase genes in tobacco seedlings grown in the presence of the MKASAA peptide is higher than in the control variant. Especially, the expression of DRM2 increases, almost 5 times.

    From the obtained data on the interaction of synthetic oligoribonucleotides (oligos) with the MKASAA peptide, it follows that the peptide predominantly binds to polyA and polyAC, polyAG, or polyAU. With other oligos, the peptide binds at significantly lower constants. Interesting results were obtained using the light scattering method. With polyA, the peptide forms giant particles up to 800 nm in size. With polyAU. polyAG and polyAC, the particle size decreases to 100 nm, while with other oligoRNAs, the peptide forms even smaller particles.

    It can be assumed that the formation of giant small RNA particles with the MKASAA peptide is necessary for chromatin remodeling and for facilitating the penetration of DNA methyltransferases involved in DNA methylation. As it was found, the expression level of DRM2 is significantly increased. DNA methyltransferase DRM2 methylates previously unmethylated DNA sites. Therefore, it would be expected that the level of global DNA methylation would be increased. Indeed, the level of DNA methylation, relative to the control, increases in both roots and leaves. It was found that the level of global DNA methylation in samples of tobacco seedlings grown in the presence of the peptide increased in both roots and leaves. It is believed that DNA methylation, mainly. associated with gene silencing. Increasing the level of DNA methylation in tobacco can lead to the silencing of certain genes.

    This assumption is confirmed by the fact that, in terms of morphometric parameters, tobacco seedlings grown in the presence of the MKASAA peptide are significantly inferior to control seedlings (Figure 1, Table 2). Based on morphometric data, we hypothesized that de novo DNA methylation occurred at the genes responsible for plant growth and development. Some of the families responsible for development are the GRF and KNOX families, as well as the EXPA.

    Growth regulation factors (GRFs) in plants are specific transcription factors. They play a leading role in stem growth, leaf, flower and seed formation, root development, and in coordinating growth processes in an unfavorable environment [31]. All proteins encoded by these genes bind to DNA at certain sites. These are DNA apurine/apyrimidine ligase, DNA topoisomerase 3α, 3′, 5′ exonuclease, and endonuclease 8 (Table 2). This is an important fact, since in the case of DNA modification of the corresponding sites, there will be no binding of growth regulator proteins. As follows from the data in Figure 5A, the level of expression of all genes of the GRF family is reduced from 10 to 20%.

    It was found that proteins encoded by the GRF genes from Hordeum vulgare barley can act as repressors. AtGRF4, AtGRF5, and AtGRF6 from Arabidopsis thaliana by binding to the intron sequence of the Knotted2 gene, repress the promoter activity of the Knotted2 gene (KNAT2) [32]. These data demonstrate that the transcription factors of the GRF and Knotted (KNOX) families interact with each other and, by binding to one or another sequence of the KNOX family genes, regulate their activity.

    KNOX genes (KNOTTED LIKE HOMEOBOX) encode homeodomain transcription factors that are involved in the arrest of cell differentiation in the apical zone of the seedling; they have been identified in all monocot and dicotyledonous plants [33]. Ectopic expression of KNOX genes in various plants causes dramatic changes in leaf and flower morphology. These changes are also accompanied by changes in hormone levels. Activation of KNOX genes in stem cell homeostasis is closely related to several hormonal pathways in plants [34]. The KNOX gene family is divided into two classes, KNOX1 and KNOX2. The Arabidopsis genome contains four KNOX1 class genes: SHOOT MERISTEMLESS (STM), BREVIPEDICELLUS (BP or KNAT1), KNAT2, and KNAT6. These genes are involved in various plant development processes and at different stages of their development. Thus, the STM gene is expressed at the stage of early embryogenesis and its expression is found in all zones of the meristem [34], the KNAT6 gene is expressed at the stage of embryonic development and its maximum expression level is found along the entire border of the meristem [35]. BP has a maximum expression level in the post-embryonic period in the meristem [36]. An increase in the expression of the KNAT2 gene occurs during embryogenesis, mainly in the center of the meristem [37]. Modulation of KNOX1 activity causes a diversity of leaf shapes in flowering plants. The functional difference between the KNOX1 and KNOX2 genes is based on the fact that the expression of the KNOX1 gene is limited to less differentiated tissues, while the KNOX2 genes are expressed in both differentiating tissues and mature organs [38]. The KNAT3 gene in Arabidopsis encodes β-glucuronidase (GUS) and belongs to the KNOX2 class [39]. The KNAT3 gene is active only in the mature root zone [40].

    One of the localization zones of the MKASAA peptide (Figure 2) is the meristem zone. The localization of the peptide in the meristem suggests that the peptide can affect the expression of genes of the KNOX family. As follows from the data presented in Figure 5B, a decrease in the level of gene activity is observed only in KNAT1 and KNAT2. The expression level of KNAT6 even increases. Probably, this fact can be explained by the specific localization of the peptide in the meristem and the maximum activity of the KNAT genes. As mentioned above, the highest activity of the KNAT1 and KNAT2 genes is located in the center of the meristem, while the activity of KNAT6 is located along the border. Since the peptide is maximally located in the center of the meristem, it has the maximum effect on the expression of the KNAT1 and KNAT2 genes, and an increase in the expression of KNAT6 is due to partial compensation of the activity of KNAT1 and KNAT2.

    The expression level of KNAT3, which is active in the root system, changes insignificantly; the presence of the peptide has practically no effect on the expression of this gene.

    According to fluorescence microscopy, the MKASAA peptide is mainly localized in the elongation zone. And morphometric indicators indicate that the peptide has an inhibitory effect on the growth and development of the root system. Expansins are pH-dependent proteins that weaken intercellular interactions. They are involved in cell expansion as well as various developmental processes that require cell wall modification. Expansins are a superfamily that contains four families: α-expansin (EXPA), β-expansin (EXPB), expansin-like A (EXLA), and expansin-like B (EXLB). It has been experimentally proven that only EXPA and EXPB proteins cause weakening of the cell wall [41],[42]. Alterations in expansin gene expression have been found to result in a marked change in root length, indicating that expansin proteins have a significant effect on cell wall loosening and elasticity, which are important during root development. The effect of the peptide on the suppression of tobacco root elongation is indicated by the fact of a significant drop in the level of expression of expansin genes, especially expansin 3 (EXPA3).

    The MKASAA peptide penetrates deep into the cell through the root system and is mainly localized on the nucleus in the zones of the cap, meristem, and elongation zone.

    The MKASAA peptide increases the expression of DNA methyltransferases, especially DRM2, which methylates previously unmethylated DNA sites. In tobacco seedlings grown in the presence of the peptide, the level of global DNA methylation increases. An increase in DNA methylation occurs via the RdDM pathway. Presumably, the peptide binds to small RNAs, forming giant particles that remulate chromatin and facilitate the penetration of DNA by methyltransferases. An increase in the level of DNA methylation is accompanied by silencing of the genes of the GRF, KNOX, and EXP families.


    Acknowledgments



    The reported study was supported by assignment 22-26-00270 of the Russian Science Foundation.

    Conflict of interest



    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.

    [1] Eichten SR, Schmitz RJ, Springer NM (2014) Epigenetics: beyond chromatin modifications and complex genetic regulation. Plant Physiol 165: 933-947. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.234211
    [2] Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T (2011) Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res 21: 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.22
    [3] Jerzmanowski A (2007) SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling and linker histones in plants. BBA-Gene Struct and Expres 1769: 330-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbaexp.2006.12.003
    [4] Jaenisch R, Bird A (2003) Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet 33: 245-254. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1089
    [5] Minard ME, Jain AK, Barton MC (2009) Analysis of epigenetic alterations to chromatin during development. Genesis 47: 559-572. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20534
    [6] Jenuwein T, Allis CD (2001) Translating the histone code. Science 293: 1074-1080. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1063127
    [7] Fischle W, Wang Y, Allis CD (2003) Histone and chromatin cross-talk. Curr Opin Cell Biol 15: 172-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-0674(03)00013-9
    [8] Goll MG, Bestor TH (2005) Eukaryotic cytosine methyltransferases. Annu Rev Biochem 74: 481.
    [9] Lister R, Pelizzola M, Dowen RH, et al. (2009) Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature 462: 315-322. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08514
    [10] Lister R, Mukamel EA, Nery JR, et al. (2013) Global epigenomic reconfiguration during mammalian brain development. Science 341: 1237905. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1237905
    [11] Erdmann RM, Picard CL (2020) RNA-directed DNA methylation. PLoS Genet 16: e1009034. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009034
    [12] Du J, Johnson LM, Jacobsen SE, et al. (2015) DNA methylation pathways and their crosstalk with histone methylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16: 519-532. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm4043
    [13] Klemm SL, Shipony Z, Greenleaf WJ (2019) Chromatin accessibility and the regulatory epigenome. Nat Rev Genet 20: 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-018-0089-8
    [14] Fortes AM, Gallusci P (2017) Plant stress responses and phenotypic plasticity in the epigenomics era: perspectives on the grapevine scenario, a model for perennial crop plants. Front Plant Sci 8: 82. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00082
    [15] Kumar A, Bennetzen JL (1999) Plant retrotransposons. Annu Rev Genet 33: 479-532.
    [16] Ito H, Kim JM, Matsunaga W, et al. (2016) A stress-activated transposon in Arabidopsis induces transgenerational abscisic acid insensitivity. Sci Rep 6: 23181. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23181
    [17] Hsiao YC, Yamada M (2021) The roles of peptide hormones and their receptors during plant root development. Genes 12: 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12010022
    [18] Fedoreyeva LI, Dilovarova TA, Kononenko NV, et al. (2018) Influence of glycylglycine, glycine, and glycylaspartic acid on growth, development, and gene expression in a tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) callus culture. Biol Bull 45: 351-358. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359018040039
    [19] Kononenko N, Baranova E, Dilovarova T, et al. (2020) Oxidative damage to various root and shoot tissues of durum and soft wheat seedlings during salinity. Agriculture 10: 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10030055
    [20] Bell K, Mitchell S, Paultre D, et al. (2013) Correlative imaging of fluorescent proteins in resin-embedded plant material. Plant Physiol 161: 1595-1603. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.212365
    [21] Fedoreyeva LI, Vanyushin BF, Baranova EN (2020) Peptide AEDL alters chromatin conformation via histone binding. AIMS Biophys 7: 1-16.
    [22] Favicchio R, Dragan AI, Kneale GG, et al. (2009) Fluorescence spectroscopy and anisotropy in the analysis of DNA-protein interactions. DNA-Protein Interactions 543: 589-611. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-015-1_35
    [23] Hsiao YC, Yamada M (2021) The roles of peptide hormones and their receptors during plant root development. Genes 12: 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12010022
    [24] Gantt JS, Lenvik TR (1991) Arabidopsis thaliana H1 histones: analysis of two members of a small gene family. Eur J Biochem 202: 1029-1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb16466.x
    [25] McGinty RK, Tan S (2015) Nucleosome structure and function. Chem Rev 115: 2255-2273. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500373h
    [26] Cuerda-Gil D, Slotkin RK (2016) Non-canonical RNA-directed DNA methylation. Nat Plants 2: 16163. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.163
    [27] Matzke MA, Kanno T, Matzke AJM (2015) RNA-directed DNA methylation: the evolution of a complex epigenetic pathway in flowering plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 66: 243-267. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-043014-114633
    [28] Wendte JM, Pikaard CS (2017) The RNAs of RNA-directed DNA methylation. BBA-Gene Regul Mech 1860: 140-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2016.08.004
    [29] Matzke MA, Mosher RA (2014) RNA-directed DNA methylation: an epigenetic pathway of increasing complexity. Nat Rev Genet 15: 394-408. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3683
    [30] Cao X, Jacobsen SE (2002) Role of the Arabidopsis DRM methyltransferases in de novo DNA methylation and gene silencing. Curr Biol 12: 1138-1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00925-9
    [31] Omidbakhshfard MA, Proost S, Fujikura U, et al. (2015) Growth-regulating factors (GRFs): a small transcription factor family with important functions in plant biology. Mol Plant 8: 998-1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2015.01.013
    [32] Kuijt SJH, Greco R, Agalou A, et al. (2014) Interaction between the GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR and KNOTTED1-LIKE HOMEOBOX families of transcription factors. Plant Physiol 164: 1952-1966. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.222836
    [33] Srinivasan C, Liu Z, Scorza R (2011) Ectopic expression of class 1 KNOX genes induce adventitious shoot regeneration and alter growth and development of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L) and European plum (Prunus domestica L). Plant Cell Rep 30: 655-664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-010-0993-7
    [34] Zhang W, Yu R (2014) Molecule mechanism of stem cells in Arabidopsis thaliana. Pharmacogn Rev 8: 105-112. https://doi.org/10.4103%2F0973-7847.134243
    [35] Long JA, Moan EI, Medford JI, et al. (1996) A member of the KNOTTED class of homeodomain proteins encoded by the STM gene of Arabidopsis. Nature 379: 66-69. https://doi.org/10.1038/379066a0
    [36] Belles-Boix E, Hamant O, Witiak SM, et al. (2006) KNAT6: an Arabidopsis homeobox gene involved in meristem activity and organ separation. Plant Cell 18: 1900-1907. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.106.041988
    [37] Byrne ME, Simorowski J, Martienssen RA (2002) ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 reveals knox gene redundancy in Arabidopsis. Development 129: 1957-1965. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.129.8.1957
    [38] Hay A, Tsiantis M (2010) KNOX genes: versatile regulators of plant development and diversity. Development 137: 3153-3165. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.030049
    [39] Serikawa KA, Martinez-Laborda A, Kim HS, et al. (1997) Localization of expression of KNAT3, a class 2 knotted1-like gene. Plant J 11: 853-861. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1997.11040853.x
    [40] Truernit E, Haseloff J (2007) A role for KNAT class II genes in root development. Plant Signal Behav 2: 10-12. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.2.1.3604
    [41] Guo W, Zhao J, Li X, et al. (2011) A soybean β-expansin gene GmEXPB2 intrinsically involved in root system architecture responses to abiotic stresses. Plant J 66: 541-552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04511.x
    [42] Cho HT, Kende H (1997) Expression of expansin genes is correlated with growth in deepwater rice. Plant Cell 9: 1661-1671. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.9.9.1661
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1533) PDF downloads(87) Cited by(0)

Figures and Tables

Figures(5)  /  Tables(5)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog