This study investigated the effects of combining an edible coating (EC) formulation with modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) on the postharvest quality of Coscia pears (Pyrus communis L.). The EC formulation consisted of Aloe vera gel, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), ascorbic acid, and citric acid. Pears were sliced and subjected to three treatments: untreated (CTR), EC with MAP1 (70% CO2 + 30% N2), and EC with MAP2 (30% CO2 + 70% N2). Physicochemical, microbiological, and sensory analyses, as well as assessments of proximate compounds and vitamin content, were conducted over a 9-day storage period at 4 ± 1 ℃ and 90% ± 5% relative humidity. The results showed that combining EC with MAP significantly reduced juice leakage, delayed browning, and preserved firmness compared to untreated samples. Additionally, MAP treatments, particularly MAP2, improved color stability by minimizing both aerobic and anaerobic respiration. Sensory evaluations indicated that treated samples had superior visual appearance and texture. Microbiological analyses confirmed that all samples maintained high hygienic standards throughout the storage period. Furthermore, mineral and vitamin content analyses demonstrated that EC and MAP treatments helped retain essential nutrients in the pear slices. In conclusion, the combination of EC and MAP effectively extended the shelf-life and preserved the nutritional quality of fresh-cut Coscia pears, offering substantial benefits for both consumers and the food industry.
Citation: Ilenia Tinebra, Roberta Passafiume, Alessandra Culmone, Eristanna Palazzolo, Giuliana Garofalo, Vincenzo Naselli, Antonio Alfonzo, Raimondo Gaglio, Vittorio Farina. Boosting post-harvest quality of 'Coscia' pears: Antioxidant-enriched coating and MAP storage[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(4): 1151-1172. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024060
| [1] | Ardiansyah, Fauziyyah Ariffa, Rizki Maryam Astuti, Wahyudi David, Dody Dwi Handoko, Slamet Budijanto, Hitoshi Shirakawa . Non-volatile compounds and blood pressure-lowering activity of Inpari 30 and Cempo Ireng fermented and non-fermented rice bran. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 337-359. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021021 |
| [2] | Santi Noviasari, Feri Kusnandar, Agus Setiyono, Slamet Budijanto . Antioxidant activity and inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase in fermented black rice bran-based analog rice. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(1): 61-72. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022004 |
| [3] | Budi Suarti, Sukarno, Ardiansyah, Slamet Budijanto . Bio-active compounds, their antioxidant activities, and the physicochemical and pasting properties of both pigmented and non-pigmented fermented de-husked rice flour. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 49-64. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021004 |
| [4] | Diana Lo, Andreas Romulo, Jia-Ying Lin, Yuh-Tai Wang, Christofora Hanny Wijaya, Ming-Chang Wu . Effect of different fermentation conditions on antioxidant capacity and isoflavones content of soy tempeh. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(3): 567-579. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022035 |
| [5] | Chiao Ying Huang, Gerald L. Riskowski, Jennifer Chang, Ching Hsuan Lin, Jinn Tsyy Lai, Audrey Chingzu Chang . Pecan shell by-products—phenolic compound contents and antimicrobial properties. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(2): 218-232. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.2.218 |
| [6] | Pattarabhorn Pakaweerachat, Worasaung Klinthong, Kazuhisa Ohtaguchi, Teerin Chysirichote . Simultaneous isoquercitin and gallic acid production of Aspergillus niger on Triphala byproduct under solid state fermentation in packed-bed bioreactor. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(2): 359-373. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023020 |
| [7] | Zina Guermazi, Cinzia Benincasa . Olive pomace as spreadable pulp: A new product for human consumption. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2018, 3(4): 441-454. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2018.4.441 |
| [8] | Teti Estiasih, Jatmiko Eko Witoyo, Khofifah Putri Wulandari, Fadhillah Dwi Juniati, Widiastuti Setyaningsih, Hanifah Nuryani Lioe, Miguel Palma, Kgs Ahmadi, Hamidie Ronald Daniel Ray, Elya Mufidah . Stability comparison of conventional and foam-mat red and purple dried roselle calyces powder as a function of pH. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2025, 10(1): 177-198. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2025010 |
| [9] | Dahye Kim, Kyung Dong Lee, Ki Choon Choi . Role of LAB in silage fermentation: Effect on nutritional quality and organic acid production—An overview. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 216-234. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021014 |
| [10] | Samsul Rizal, Maria Erna Kustyawati, Murhadi, Udin Hasanudin, Subeki . The effect of inoculum types on microbial growth, β-glucan formation and antioxidant activity during tempe fermentation. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(2): 370-386. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022024 |
This study investigated the effects of combining an edible coating (EC) formulation with modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) on the postharvest quality of Coscia pears (Pyrus communis L.). The EC formulation consisted of Aloe vera gel, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), ascorbic acid, and citric acid. Pears were sliced and subjected to three treatments: untreated (CTR), EC with MAP1 (70% CO2 + 30% N2), and EC with MAP2 (30% CO2 + 70% N2). Physicochemical, microbiological, and sensory analyses, as well as assessments of proximate compounds and vitamin content, were conducted over a 9-day storage period at 4 ± 1 ℃ and 90% ± 5% relative humidity. The results showed that combining EC with MAP significantly reduced juice leakage, delayed browning, and preserved firmness compared to untreated samples. Additionally, MAP treatments, particularly MAP2, improved color stability by minimizing both aerobic and anaerobic respiration. Sensory evaluations indicated that treated samples had superior visual appearance and texture. Microbiological analyses confirmed that all samples maintained high hygienic standards throughout the storage period. Furthermore, mineral and vitamin content analyses demonstrated that EC and MAP treatments helped retain essential nutrients in the pear slices. In conclusion, the combination of EC and MAP effectively extended the shelf-life and preserved the nutritional quality of fresh-cut Coscia pears, offering substantial benefits for both consumers and the food industry.
Rice bran is an agricultural by-product obtained after rice milling process, which accumulates more than 180, 000 cubic tons per year. There are many products from rice bran such as rice bran oil, animal feed, ingredient for cosmetics, etc. Rice bran has high nutritious chemical compositions with protein, lipid, carbohydrate, fiber, and vitamin B as detailed in previous reports [1,2]. Including many bioactive compounds as gamma-oryzanol, tocopherol, tocotrienol, adenosine, and ferulic acid which played an important role as a functional food. Moreover, there are many investigations of rice bran with health benefits including blood cholesterol reduction, cardio protective, and anticancer effects, etc. [3,4,5]. Consequently, rice bran becomes more interesting agricultural residue for the food and pharmaceutical industry applications.
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) also known as probiotic that live in digestive systems, such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. LAB has an important role in benefitting human and animal health that well documented with the effect of gastrointestinal pathogen inhibition, the production of antimicrobial metabolites, the immune response enhancement, the improvement of lactose metabolism and the colon cancer prevention [6].
Solid state fermentation (SSF) is a biochemical process of biomass conversion by microorganism on solid material with limited free liquid. SSF has more advantages over submerged fermentation especially with higher fermentation productivity and better product functionalities as bioactivity and bioavailability during the fermentation process. Many SSF applications have been developed the agricultural by products as substrates in order to adding the value to products such as rice bran, sugar cane bagasse, coffee grounds, cassava waste, soybean cake, etc. [7].
By the reason of rice bran is an inexpensive which highly available natural source and comprises of many bioactive compounds. This study aims to evaluate the rice bran extract from SSF by LAB with different moisture contents following determine total polysaccharide, total phenolic content, and the antioxidant activity then further investigate the composition of phenolic compounds by HPLC analysis.
Two rice bran strains for this study were Khao Bahn Nah and Thai jasmine from Prachin Buri province, Thailand. Probiotic strains: L. casei TISTR 1463 and L. plantarum TISTR 1465 were cultivated in Man Rogosa Sharpe medium (MRS) from Himedia (Mumbai, India). All other chemicals used were analytical grade and purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Luis, USA) and Carlo ERBA (Val de Reuil, France).
Rice bran was dried in an oven at 105 ℃ for 24 h and prepared 30 g in each flask, then autoclaved at 121 ℃ for 15 minutes. After that, the rice bran was adjusted the moisture content into 50 and 75% w/v by sterilized water. L. casei and L. plantarum were grown at 37 ℃ for 48 h under anaerobic condition in MRS broth and determined the optical cell density with a spectrophotometer at 600 nm, then equal to 1.0 (previously estimated about 108 CFU/mL by Trabelsi et al. [8]) for applying as an inoculum. LAB was separately inoculated by adding into the prepared rice bran in a ratio of 10% w/v then subjected to incubation at 37 ℃ for 72 h. Five grams of each sample was taken every 24 h then extracted by adding 50 mL of 70% v/v ethanol further incubated in a shaker at room temperature, 200 ×g for 24 h. All extracted samples were centrifuged at 16, 000 ×g for 20 minutes at room temperature, after that evaporated by a rotary evaporator at 50 ℃, 100 ×g, then stored the samples at 4 ℃ for further determination with triplicate analysis.
The total polysaccharide content of the rice bran extracts were determined by the phenol sulfuric acid according Dubois method [9]. Prepared an appropriate diluted sample 0.25 mL in a test tube, then immediately added 1.25 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid (95% v/v) and 0.25 mL of 5% v/v phenol. A mixture was heated at 90 ℃ for 5 minutes then cooled until it reached to room temperature. A colorimetric of rice bran sample performed the total polysaccharide content by monitoring an absorbance at 490 nm. The standard and blank were prepared in the same way as the analyzed sample, except for adding 0.25 mL glucose standard and 0.25 mL distilled water instead of the sample, respectively.
The rice bran extracts were determined total phenolic compound by Folin-Ciocalteu assay from modified method of Yee et al. [10]. After the extraction process, an aliquot (0.04 mL) of extracted rice bran was mixed with 0.2 mL Folin-Ciocalteu reagent and 0.26 mL distilled water, left in a room temperature for 8 minutes. After that 0.6 M sodium bicarbonate (0.5 mL) was added into the reaction mixture and incubated in a dark room temperature for 2 h, then determined the absorbance at 725 nm. Gallic acid was prepared and analyzed in the same way as the rice bran extracts which was used as a standard for phenolic content calculation.
The antioxidant activity was examined by DPPH assay, which described from the previous protocol [11]. The rice bran extract (0.12 mL) was mixed with freshly prepared 0.5 mM DPPH reagent in methanol (1.08 mL), then left in a darkness room for 30 minutes and measured the absorbance at 517 nm. DPPH in methanol was used as a blank for calculation the percentage of antioxidant activity (% DPPH inhibition) by following equation:
| (1) |
The quantifying composition of the rice bran extracts were analyzed by HPLC that is described elsewhere in Brum et al. [12]. HPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) coupled UV/visible detector were used with a column of Thermo Hypersil Gold (4.6 mm × 150 mm, 3 µm) at 40 ℃ with 2% v/v of acetic acid in methanol solution as a mobile phase at a constant flow rate of 0.7 mL/min. The samples were analyzed with differential refractometer. All standard compounds as tocopherol, gamma-oryzanol, coumaric acid, and ferulic acid were used for peak identification.
One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test was performed with SPSS program for Windows, V.21 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Differences with a probability value of < 0.05 were considered significant and all data were reported as mean ± SD.
After the rice brans were SSF by different LAB and moisture contents, the fermented samples were collected and extracted by ethanol, then stored at 4 ℃ for further analytical studies as shown below.
The total polysaccharide of the rice bran extracts from SSF by different LAB and moisture contents showed in Fig. 1. In the condition without SSF (blank) presented a high total polysaccharide along the fermentation period when compared with the rice bran extracts from SSF by both LAB significantly (p < 0.05). Thai jasmine without SSF at 75% w/v moisture exhibited the highest total polysaccharide as 38.77 mg/mL after 72 h, while the rice bran extracts with SSF showed a lower total polysaccharide with a longer incubation period. The rice bran extracts from Khao Bahn Nah with SSF by L. casei at 50% w/v moisture (Figure 1A) presented a high total polysaccharide as 29.69 mg/mL at 24 h then total polysaccharide decreased after 48 and 72 h (25.63 and 18.85 mg/mL), which has the same tendency as the rice bran extracts from Thai jasmine with SSF by both LAB (Figure 1B). Noticeably, both strains of rice extracts by L. plantarum displayed a lower total polysaccharide than L. casei. The lowest total polysaccharide was in the condition of Thai jasmine with L. plantarum at 75% w/v moisture after 72 h (2.44 mg/mL). The reduction of total polysaccharide along the SSF period can be explained that LAB was using carbohydrate during the fermentation for their growth lead to lower total polysaccharide in the rice extract samples with SSF. These results are consistent with those of Saman et al. [13] who found the reducing sugar was decreased after 48 hours when inoculated L. plantarum NCIMB8826 with whole grain brown rice and rice bran, while L. plantarum grew well and reached to a maximum value at 30 h.
The rice bran extracts from SSF by both LAB with different moisture contents (Figure 2) displayed a significant increase amount of phenolic content when compared with both strains of the rice bran extracts without SSF (p < 0.05). Khao Bahn Nah extract with SSF by L. plantarum (Figure 2A) at 50% w/v moisture for 48 hours presented the highest total phenolic content (2.88 mg/mL). Observable, the rice bran extracts of all SSF conditions showed higher total phenolic content at 48 hours of incubation than the other periods. This may explain by the maximum LAB growth at 48 hours from the previous report of Nisa et al. [14] that also discovered the maximum amount of total phenolic content at 48 h as well in the fermented rice bran with L. plantarum (FNCC 0027) and L. lactic (FNCC 0080). Furthermore, SSF technique has successfully performed to increase phenolic compounds by microorganism fermented rice bran with Rhizopus oryzae (CT1217) which provided a high quality of rice bran extract and biological activity compared to unfermented rice bran following the description by Schmidt et al. [15].
The antioxidant activity results in Figure 3 exposed both strains of rice bran extracts without SSF (blank) had a significant lower antioxidant activity (about 45%-56%) than the rice bran extracts with SSF (p > 0.05). Whereas the rice bran extracts from Thai jasmine and Khao Bahn Nah with SSF by L. casei at 50% w/v moisture for 48 hours displayed the highest percentage of antioxidant activities as 78.79% and 78.49%. A similar study was conducted from Zubaidah et al. [16] that investigated the antioxidant activity from the fermented rice bran and skim milk by L. plantarum J2 and L. casei. From the results, the rice bran extracts from the fermentation by LAB displayed a high antioxidant activity of 88.86%, while the antioxidant activity from fermented skim milk was at only 30.13%. This could be interpreted as during the SSF process, biocatalyst from microorganism would cleave the bonds between phenolic compounds and other substances then subjected to enhance the antioxidant activity. As in the experiment of Cheng et al. [17] which inspected the high value of total phenolic content, total flavonoid content conversion, and their antioxidant activity during the fermentation process of the rice bran with Monascus pilosus KCCM60084.
In this study, the fermented rice bran extracts by both LAB disclosed lower total polysaccharide, even though the phenolic content and antioxidant activity revealed higher value than rice bran extracts without SSF. These results may differ from some research reports [18,19] that described the polysaccharide from natural sources considering the antioxidant effectiveness. By the way, there is a possibility of no correlation between the increasing of polysaccharide content and the high performance of antioxidant activity, since LAB growth is one of the main factors affecting the reduction of polysaccharide concentration. Besides, the polysaccharide is subjected to transform into other bioactive compounds along the SSF process and contribute to the improvement of antioxidant properties as observed by Magro et al. [20] and Ayyash et al. [21].
According to the analytical results of this study, the rice bran extracts with 50% w/v moisture at 48 hours presented high phenolic content along with very effective antioxidant activity. Under these conditions, six rice bran extract samples were selected for HPLC analysis: A = Khao Bahn Nah without SSF (blank), B = Khao Bahn Nah with SSF by L. casei, C = Khao Bahn Nah with SSF by L. plantarum, D = Thai jasmine without SSF (blank), E = Thai jasmine with SSF by L. casei, and F = Thai jasmine with SSF by L. plantarum. The standard compounds as tocopherol, gamma-oryzanol, coumaric acid, and ferulic acid, were used for peak identification in order to compare the quantity of the rice bran extract samples. From Table 1 tocopherol, gamma-oryzanol, and ferulic acid were found in all rice bran extract samples in their compositions. Only in the sample E displayed coumaric acid at 14.47 mg/L with high level of ferulic acid (35.23 mg/L). Increasing of ferulic acid during the fermentation had been investigated in the previous research of Huang and Lai [22] that analyzed the bioactive compounds from four strains of Taiwan rice bran and two strains of Thai rice bran, after the fermentation process, all rice brans demonstrated high concentration of ferulic acid. As well to that documented by Rashid et al. [23] who evaluated the composition of bioactive compounds which revealed many phenolic compounds and organic acids (such as alpha-tocopherol, gamma-oryzanol, ferulic acid, ascorbic acid, etc.) of the fermented rice bran with LAB by HPLC analysis.
| Sample | Tocopherol | Gamma-oryzanol | Coumaric acid | Ferulic acid |
| A | 3.69 ± 0.29c | 1.55 ± 0.74c | ND | 18.91 ± 0.60d |
| B | 8.75 ± 1.11a | 2.57 ± 0.56ab | ND | 30.93 ± 0.81b |
| C | 4.09 ± 0.17c | 1.44 ± 0.36c | ND | 19.39 ± 0.56d |
| D | 3.35 ± 0.97c | 1.69 ± 0.35ab | ND | 18.86 ± 1.05d |
| E | 4.51 ± 0.38c | 3.16 ± 0.15a | 14.47 ± 1.20 | 35.23 ± 0.82a |
| F | 7.10 ± 0.23b | 2.31 ± 0.65abc | ND | 21.61 ± 0.66c |
| ND = not detected. Data are expressed as mean ± SD and the values in the same column with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. | ||||
DownLoad:
CSV
From this study, two rice bran strains (Khao Bahn Nah and Thai jasmine) were SSF by LAB (L. casei and L. plantarum) with different moisture contents (50% and 75% w/v) for 72 h. The rice bran extracts were evaluated total polysaccharide, total phenolic content, antioxidant activity, and their composition by HPLC analysis. Total polysaccharide in the fermented rice bran extract was lower than those without SSF since LAB growth during the fermentation causes the polysaccharide decreased in the fermented rice bran extract. However, considering of phenolic content and antioxidant activity, all fermented rice bran extracts exposed with higher antioxidant property aspect than the samples without SSF. Specifically, the fermented Khao Bahn Nah extract by L. plantarum with 50% w/v moisture demonstrated a great amount of total phenolic content after 48 h. As the same SSF incubation time and moisture content, both fermented rice bran extract strains by L. casei performed high efficiency of antioxidant activity. Tocopherol, gamma-oryzanol, and ferulic acid were found in all rice bran extract samples, mostly in the fermented Thai jasmine extract by L. casei with 50% w/v moisture expressed with high quantity of coumaric acid, and ferulic acid compared with the other rice bran extract samples. Overall, the results from this study indicate that the rice bran extract from SSF by LAB can establish the varieties of phenolic compounds and enhance the potential of antioxidant activity which could be applied further as functional food products and value added to the agricultural residues in Thailand.
The authors would like to thank Miss Duangkamon Sangiamdee from the Chemistry Department, Ramkhamhaeng University for HPLC analysis. Financial support from Ramkhamhaeng University is gratefully acknowledged.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
| [1] | Cyril K, Rahman MM, Singh G, et al. (2023) The impact of pear on nutrition and health: A review. Energy KJ 264: 227. |
| [2] | FAOSTAT. Available from: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL. |
| [3] |
Ozturk A, Faizi ZA (2023) Growth, yield and quality performance of pear (Pyrus communis L.) cv.'Santa Maria'under high density planting. Braz Arch Biol Technol 66: e23220414. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-2023220414 doi: 10.1590/1678-4324-2023220414
|
| [4] |
Dondini L, Sansavini S (2012) European pear. Fruit Breed 369–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0763-9_11 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0763-9_11
|
| [5] |
Guccione E, Allegra A, Farina V, et al. (2023) Use of xanthan gum and calcium ascorbate to prolong cv. Butirra pear slices shelf life during storage. Adv Hortic Sci 37: 59–66. https://doi.org/10.36253/ahsc-13872 doi: 10.36253/ahsc-13872
|
| [6] |
Kolniak-Ostek J (2016) Chemical composition and antioxidant capacity of different anatomical parts of pear (Pyrus communis L.). Food Chem 203: 491–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.02.103 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.02.103
|
| [7] |
Chen J, Wang Z, Wu J, et al. (2007) Chemical compositional characterization of eight pear cultivars grown in China. Food Chem 104: 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.11.038 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.11.038
|
| [8] |
Olunusi SO, Ramli NH, Fatmawati A, et al. (2024) Revolutionizing tropical fruits preservation: Emerging edible coating technologies. Int J Biol Macromol 264: 130682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.130682 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.130682
|
| [9] |
Tinebra I, Passafiume R, Scuderi D, et al. (2022) Effects of tray-drying on the physicochemical, microbiological, proximate, and sensory properties of white- and red-fleshed loquat (Eriobotrya Japonica Lindl.) fruit. Agronomy 12: 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020540 doi: 10.3390/agronomy12020540
|
| [10] | Farina V, Sortino G, Saletta F, et al. (2017) Effects of rapid refrigeration and modified atmosphere packaging on litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) fruit quality traits. Chem Eng 58: 415–420. |
| [11] |
Lamani NA, Ramaswamy HS (2023) Composite alginate–ginger oil edible coating for fresh-cut pears. J Compos Sci 7: 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7060245 doi: 10.3390/jcs7060245
|
| [12] |
Allegra A, Inglese P, Farina V, et al. (2023) Effects of xanthan gum and calcium ascorbate treatments on color and nutritional quality of fresh cut pear fruit. ACTA Hortic 1364: 351–358. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2023.1364.45 doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2023.1364.45
|
| [13] |
Just DR, Goddard JM (2023) Behavioral framing and consumer acceptance of new food technologies: Factors influencing consumer demand for active packaging. Agribusiness 39: 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21778 doi: 10.1002/agr.21778
|
| [14] | Zhang H, Gallardo RK, McCluskey JJ, et al. (2010) Consumers' willingness to pay for treatment-induced quality attributes in Anjou pears. J Agric Resour Econ 35: 105–117. |
| [15] |
Amanatidou A, Smid E, Gorris L (1999) Effect of elevated oxygen and carbon dioxide on the surface growth of vegetable‐associated micro‐organisms. J Appl Microbiol 86: 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00682.x doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00682.x
|
| [16] |
Farber J, Harris L, Parish M, et al. (2003) Microbiological safety of controlled and modified atmosphere packaging of fresh and fresh‐cut produce. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2: 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2003.tb00032.x doi: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2003.tb00032.x
|
| [17] | Ares G, Lareo C, Lema P (2007) Modified atmosphere packaging for postharvest storage of mushrooms. A review. Fresh Prod 1: 32–40. |
| [18] |
Oguz‐Korkut G, Kucukmehmetoglu S, Gunes G (2022) Effects of modified atmosphere packaging on physicochemical properties of fresh‐cut 'Deveci'pears. J Food Process Preserv 46: e16002. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.16002 doi: 10.1111/jfpp.16002
|
| [19] |
Roppolo P, Tinebra I, Passafiume R, et al. (2023) Tray-drying is a new way to valorise white-fleshed peach fruit. AIMS Agric Food 8: 944–961. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2023050 doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023050
|
| [20] |
Phillips CA (1996) Modified atmosphere packaging and its effects on the microbiological quality and safety of produce. Int J Food Sci Technol 31: 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2621.1996.00369.x doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2621.1996.00369.x
|
| [21] |
Sandhya (2010) Modified atmosphere packaging of fresh produce: Current status and future needs. LWT-Food Sci Technol 43: 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2009.05.018 doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2009.05.018
|
| [22] | Ahmed M, Yousef AR, Sarrwy S (2011) Modified atmosphere packaging for maintaining quality and shelf life extension of persimmon fruits. Asian J Agric Sci 3: 308–316. |
| [23] |
Ikiz D, Gallardo RK, Dhingra A, et al. (2018) Assessing consumers' preferences and willingness to pay for novel sliced packed fresh pears: A latent class approach. Agribusiness 34: 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21532 doi: 10.1002/agr.21532
|
| [24] |
Qu P, Zhang M, Fan K, et al. (2022) Microporous modified atmosphere packaging to extend shelf life of fresh foods: A review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 62: 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1811635 doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1811635
|
| [25] |
Passafiume R, Tinebra I, Gaglio R, et al. (2022) Fresh-cut mangoes: How to increase shelf life by using neem oil edible coating. Coatings 12: 664. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12050664 doi: 10.3390/coatings12050664
|
| [26] |
Piechowiak T, Skóra B (2023) Edible coating enriched with cinnamon oil reduces the oxidative stress and improves the quality of strawberry fruit stored at room temperature. J Sci Food Agric 103: 2389–2400. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.12463 doi: 10.1002/jsfa.12463
|
| [27] |
Kumar P, Kumar L, Tanwar R, et al. (2023) Active edible coating based on guar gum with mint extract and antibrowning agents for ber (Ziziphus mauritiana) fruits preservation. J Food Meas Charact 17: 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-022-01609-6 doi: 10.1007/s11694-022-01609-6
|
| [28] |
Pashova S (2023) Application of plant waxes in edible coatings. Coatings 13: 911. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13050911 doi: 10.3390/coatings13050911
|
| [29] |
Priya K, Thirunavookarasu N, Chidanand DV (2023) Recent advances in edible coating of food products and its legislations: A review. J Agric Food Res 12: 100623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100623 doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100623
|
| [30] |
Pham TT, Nguyen LLP, Dam MS, et al. (2023) Application of edible coating in extension of fruit shelf life: Review. AgriEngineering 5: 520–536. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering5010034 doi: 10.3390/agriengineering5010034
|
| [31] |
Passafiume R, Gugliuzza G, Gaglio R, et al. (2021) Aloe-based edible coating to maintain quality of fresh-cut Italian pears (Pyrus communis L.) during cold storage. Horticulturae 7: 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7120581 doi: 10.3390/horticulturae7120581
|
| [32] |
Scramin JA, de Britto D, Forato LA, et al. (2011) Characterisation of zein–oleic acid films and applications in fruit coating. Int J Food Sci Technol 46: 2145–2152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2011.02729.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2011.02729.x
|
| [33] |
Benítez S, Achaerandio I, Pujolà M, et al. (2015) Aloe vera as an alternative to traditional edible coatings used in fresh-cut fruits: A case of study with kiwifruit slices. LWT-Food Sci Technol 61: 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.11.036 doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2014.11.036
|
| [34] |
Arias E, López-Buesa P, Oria R (2009) Extension of fresh-cut "Blanquilla" pear (Pyrus communis L.) shelf-life by 1-MCP treatment after harvest. Postharvest Biol Technol 54: 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.04.009 doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.04.009
|
| [35] | Ruangchakpet A, Sajjaanantakul T (2007) Effect of browning on total phenolic, flavonoid content and antioxidant activity in Indian gooseberry (Phyllanthus emblica Linn.). Agric Nat Resour 41: 331–337. |
| [36] |
Palazzolo E, Letizia Gargano M, Venturella G (2012) The nutritional composition of selected wild edible mushrooms from Sicily (southern Italy). Int J Food Sci Nutr 63: 79–83. https://doi.org/10.3109/09637486.2011.598850 doi: 10.3109/09637486.2011.598850
|
| [37] | Morand P, Gullo J (1970) Mineralisation des tissus vegetaux en vue du dosage de P, Ca, Mg, Na, K. Ann Agron 21: 229–236. |
| [38] |
Fogg DN, Wilkinson NT (1958) The colorimetric determination of phosphorus. Analyst 83: 406–414. https://doi.org/10.1039/an9588300406 doi: 10.1039/an9588300406
|
| [39] |
Asfaw TB, Tadesse MG, Tessema FB, et al. (2024) Ultrasonic-assisted extraction and UHPLC determination of ascorbic acid, polyphenols, and half-maximum effective concentration in Citrus medica and Ziziphus spina-christi fruits using multivariate experimental design. Food Chem: X 22: 101310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101310 doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101310
|
| [40] | ISO (International Organisation for Standardisation) (2007) ISO 8589: 2007. Sensory analysis-general guidance for the design of test rooms. |
| [41] |
Vishwasrao C, Ananthanarayan L (2016) Postharvest shelf-life extension of pink guavas (Psidium guajava L.) using HPMC-based edible surface coatings. J Food Sci Technol 53: 1966–1974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-2164-x doi: 10.1007/s13197-015-2164-x
|
| [42] |
Avcı V, Islam A, Ozturk B, et al. (2023) Effects of Aloe vera gel and modified atmosphere packaging treatments on quality properties and bioactive compounds of plum (Prunus salicina L.) fruit throughout cold storage and shelf life. Erwerbs-Obstbau 65: 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00694-7 doi: 10.1007/s10341-022-00694-7
|
| [43] |
Gorsi FI, Hussain A, Kausar T, et al. (2024) Structural and thermal interaction studies of aloe vera (aloe barbadensis miller) gel powder and developed food bars. J Therm Anal Calorim 149: 4543–4559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-024-13007-9 doi: 10.1007/s10973-024-13007-9
|
| [44] |
Suriati L, Utama IMS, Harsojuwono BA, et al. (2022) Effect of additives on surface tension, viscosity, transparency and morphology structure of aloe vera gel-based coating. Front Sustain Food Syst 6: 831671. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.831671 doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2022.831671
|
| [45] |
Siracusa V (2012) Food packaging permeability behaviour: A report. Int J Polym Sci 2012: 302029. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/302029 doi: 10.1155/2012/302029
|
| [46] |
Liao X, Xing Y, Fan X, et al. (2023) Effect of composite edible coatings combined with modified atmosphere packaging on the storage quality and microbiological properties of fresh-cut pineapple. Foods 12: 1344. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12061344 doi: 10.3390/foods12061344
|
| [47] |
Esmaeili Y, Zamindar N, Paidari S, et al. (2021) The synergistic effects of aloe vera gel and modified atmosphere packaging on the quality of strawberry fruit. J Food Proc Preserv 45: e16003. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.16003 doi: 10.1111/jfpp.16003
|
| [48] |
Ghidelli C, Pérez-Gago MB (2018) Recent advances in modified atmosphere packaging and edible coatings to maintain quality of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 58: 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2016.1211087 doi: 10.1080/10408398.2016.1211087
|
| [49] | Coskun MG, Omeroglu PY, Copur OU (2017) Increasing shelf life of fruits and vegetables with combined system of modified atmosphere packaging and edible films coating. Eur J Food Sci Technol 1: 47–53. |
| [50] |
Pathare PB, Opara UL, Al-Said FA-J (2013) Colour measurement and analysis in fresh and processed foods: A review. Food Bioprocess Technol 6: 36–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0867-9 doi: 10.1007/s11947-012-0867-9
|
| [51] |
Awad AHR, Parmar A, Ali MR, et al. (2021) Extending the shelf-life of fresh-cut green bean pods by ethanol, ascorbic acid, and essential oils. Foods 10: 1103. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10051103 doi: 10.3390/foods10051103
|
| [52] |
Huglin MB, Zakaria MB (1983) Comments on expressing the permeability of polymers to gases. Angew Makromol Chem 117: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/apmc.1983.051170101 doi: 10.1002/apmc.1983.051170101
|
| [53] |
Yu K, He W, Ma X, et al. (2024) Purification and biochemical characterization of polyphenol oxidase extracted from wheat bran (Wan grano). Molecules 29: 1334. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29061334 doi: 10.3390/molecules29061334
|
| [54] | Parry R (2012) Principles and applications of modified atmosphere packaging of foods. Springer Science & Business Media. |
| [55] |
Wilson MD, Stanley RA, Eyles A, et al. (2019) Innovative processes and technologies for modified atmosphere packaging of fresh and fresh-cut fruits and vegetables. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 59: 411–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2017.1375892 doi: 10.1080/10408398.2017.1375892
|
| [56] |
Passafiume R, Roppolo P, Tinebra I, et al. (2023) Reduction of pericarp browning and microbial spoilage on litchi fruits in modified atmosphere packaging. Horticulturae 9: 651. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9060651 doi: 10.3390/horticulturae9060651
|
| [57] |
Saeed Khan M, Zeb A, Rahatullah K, et al. (2013) Storage life extension of plum fruit with different colored packaging and storage temperatures. IOSR J Environ Sci Toxicol Food Technol 7: 86–93. https://doi.org/10.9790/2402-0738693 doi: 10.9790/2402-0738693
|
| [58] | Goncalves E, Antunes P, Brackmann A (2000) Controlled atmosphere storage of Asian pears cv. Nijisseiki. |
| [59] |
Kou X, Jiang B, Zhang Y, et al. (2016) The regulation of sugar metabolism in Huangguan pears (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) with edible coatings of calcium or Pullulan during cold storage. Hortic Sci Technol 34: 898–911. https://doi.org/10.12972/kjhst.20160094 doi: 10.12972/kjhst.20160094
|
| [60] | Wong DW, Camirand WM, Pavlath AE (1994) Development of edible coatings for minimally processed fruits and vegetables. Edible Coatings and Films to Improve Food Quality, US, 65–88. |
| [61] |
Zheng G, Pan D, Niu X, et al. (2014) Changes in cell Ca2+ distribution in loquat leaves and its effects on cold tolerance. Korean J Hortic Sci Technol 32: 607–613. https://doi.org/10.7235/hort.2014.13009 doi: 10.7235/hort.2014.13009
|
| [62] |
Siddiq R, Auras R, Siddiq M, et al. (2020) Effect of modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) and NatureSeal® treatment on the physico-chemical, microbiological, and sensory quality of fresh-cut d'Anjou pears. Food Packag Shelf Life 23: 100–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2019.100454 doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2019.100454
|
| [63] |
Gomes MH, Fundo JF, Poças MF, et al. (2012) Quality changes in fresh-cut 'Rocha'pear as affected by oxygen levels in modified atmosphere packaging and the pH of antibrowning additive. Postharvest Biol Technol 74: 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2012.06.014 doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2012.06.014
|
| [64] |
Soliva‐Fortuny RC, Grigelmo‐Miguel N, Hernando I, et al. (2002) Effect of minimal processing on the textural and structural properties of fresh‐cut pears. J Sci Food Agric 82: 1682–1688. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1248 doi: 10.1002/jsfa.1248
|
| [65] | Mg AE-G, Zaki ZA, Ekbal ZA (2019) Effect of some postharvest treatments on quality of alphonse mango fruits during cold storage. Middle East J Agric Res 8: 1067–1079. |
| [66] | Abbasi NA, Iqbal Z, Maqbool M, et al. (2009) Postharvest quality of mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruit as affected by chitosan coating. Pak J Bot 41: 343–357. |
| [67] |
Zhang Y, Kong Q, Niu B, et al. (2024) The dual function of calcium ion in fruit edible coating: Regulating polymer internal crosslinking state and improving fruit postharvest quality. Food Chem 447: 138952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.138952 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.138952
|
| [68] |
Mannozzi C, Tylewicz U, Chinnici F, et al. (2018) Effects of chitosan based coatings enriched with procyanidin by-product on quality of fresh blueberries during storage. Food Chem 251: 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.015 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.015
|
| [69] | Negi PS, Handa AK (2008) Structural deterioration of the produce: the breakdown of cell wall components. In: Postharvest Biology and Technology of Fruits, Vegetables, and Flowers 978: 0–8138. |
| [70] | Gontard N, Guillaume C (2010) 16—Packaging and the shelf life of fruits and vegetables. In: Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 297. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420078459-c16 |
| [71] |
Zhang Y (2024) Post-harvest cold shock treatment enhanced antioxidant capacity to reduce chilling injury and improves the shelf life of guava (Psidium guajava L.). Front Sustain Food Syst 8: 1297056. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1297056 doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1297056
|
| [72] | Watkins, C. B. (2017). Postharvest physiology of edible plant tissues. In: Fennema's Food Chemistry, CRC press, 1017–1085. |
| [73] | Knee M (1990) Ethylene effects in controlled atmosphere storage of horticultural crops. In: Food Preservation by Modified Atmospheres, 225–235. |
| [74] |
Liao X, Xing Y, Fan X, et al. (2023) Effect of composite edible coatings combined with modified atmosphere packaging on the storage quality and microbiological properties of fresh-cut pineapple. Foods 12: 1344. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12061344 doi: 10.3390/foods12061344
|
| [75] |
Dhall RK (2016) Application of edible coatings on fruits and vegetables. Imp J Interdiscip Res 3: 591–603. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119185055.ch4 doi: 10.1002/9781119185055.ch4
|
| [76] | Sousa-Gallagher MJ, Tank A, Sousa R (2016) Emerging technologies to extend the shelf life and stability of fruits and vegetables. In: The Stability and Shelf Life of Food, Woodhead Publishing, 399–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100435-7.00014-9 |
| [77] |
Sortino G, Inglese P, Farina V, et al. (2022) The use of opuntia ficus-indica mucilage and aloe arborescens as edible coatings to improve the physical, chemical, and microbiological properties of 'Hayward' kiwifruit slices. Horticulturae 8: 219. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8030219 doi: 10.3390/horticulturae8030219
|
| [78] |
Alegbeleye O, Odeyemi OA, Strateva M, et al. (2022) Microbial spoilage of vegetables, fruits and cereals. Appl Food Res 2: 100122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2022.100122 doi: 10.1016/j.afres.2022.100122
|
| [79] |
Karanth S, Feng S, Patra D, et al. (2023) Linking microbial contamination to food spoilage and food waste: The role of smart packaging, spoilage risk assessments, and date labeling. Front Microbiol 14: 1198124. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1198124 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1198124
|
| [80] |
Leff JW, Fierer N (2013) Bacterial communities associated with the surfaces of fresh fruits and vegetables. PloS One 8: e59310. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059310 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059310
|
| [81] |
Wu J, Fan J, Li Q, et al. (2022) Variation of organic acids in mature fruits of 193 pear (Pyrus spp.) cultivars. J Food Compos Anal 109: 104483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104483 doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104483
|
| [82] | Yim S-H, Nam S-H (2016) Physiochemical, nutritional and functional characterization of 10 different pear cultivars (Pyrus spp.). J Appl Bot Food Qual 89: 73–81. |
| [83] | Artés F, Gómez PA, Artés-Hernández F (2006) Modified atmosphere packaging of fruits and vegetables. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 28: 1–30. |
| [84] |
Carr AC, Maggini S (2017) Vitamin C and immune function. Nutrients 9: 1211. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9111211 doi: 10.3390/nu9111211
|
| [85] |
Di Vaio C, Graziani G, Marra L, et al. (2008) Antioxidant capacities, carotenoids and polyphenols evaluation of fresh and refrigerated peach and nectarine cultivars from Italy. Eur Food Res Technol 227: 1225–1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-008-0840-z doi: 10.1007/s00217-008-0840-z
|
| [86] | Ozturk I, Ercisli S, Kalkan F, et al. (2009) Some chemical and physico-mechanical properties of pear cultivars. Afr J Biotechnol 8: 687–693. |
| [87] |
Arora B, Sethi S, Joshi A, et al. (2018) Antioxidant degradation kinetics in apples. J Food Sci Technol 55: 1306–1313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-018-3041-1 doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3041-1
|
| [88] |
Rojas‐Graü M, Soliva‐Fortuny R, Martín‐Belloso O (2008) Effect of natural antibrowning agents on color and related enzymes in fresh‐cut Fuji apples as an alternative to the use of ascorbic acid. J Food Sci 73: S267–S272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00794.x doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00794.x
|
| [89] |
Lin L, Li Q, Wang B, et al. (2007) Inhibition of core browning in 'Yali'pear fruit by post-harvest treatment with ascorbic acid. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 82: 397–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2007.11512250 doi: 10.1080/14620316.2007.11512250
|
| [90] |
Veltman R, Kho R, Van Schaik A, et al. (2000) Ascorbic acid and tissue browning in pears (Pyrus communis L. cvs Rocha and Conference) under controlled atmosphere conditions. Postharvest Biol Technol 19: 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00095-8 doi: 10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00095-8
|
| 1. | Riza Andriani, Toto Subroto, Safri Ishmayana, Dikdik Kurnia, Enhancement Methods of Antioxidant Capacity in Rice Bran: A Review, 2022, 11, 2304-8158, 2994, 10.3390/foods11192994 | |
| 2. | Sucheta Khubber, Francisco J Marti-Quijal, Igor Tomasevic, Fabienne Remize, Francisco J Barba, Lactic acid fermentation as a useful strategy to recover antimicrobial and antioxidant compounds from food and by-products, 2022, 43, 22147993, 189, 10.1016/j.cofs.2021.11.013 | |
| 3. | Mohamed Ghamry, Wei Zhao, Li Li, Impact of Lactobacillus apis on the antioxidant activity, phytic acid degradation, nutraceutical value and flavor properties of fermented wheat bran, compared to Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus plantarum, 2023, 163, 09639969, 112142, 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.112142 | |
| 4. | Hla Myo, Nara Nantarat, Nuntawat Khat-Udomkiri, Changes in Bioactive Compounds of Coffee Pulp through Fermentation-Based Biotransformation Using Lactobacillus plantarum TISTR 543 and Its Antioxidant Activities, 2021, 7, 2311-5637, 292, 10.3390/fermentation7040292 | |
| 5. | Bhagavathi Sundaram Sivamaruthi, Karthikeyan Alagarsamy, Subramanian Thangaleela, Muruganantham Bharathi, Periyanaina Kesika, Chaiyavat Chaiyasut, Composition, Microbiota, Mechanisms, and Anti-Obesity Properties of Rice Bran, 2023, 12, 2304-8158, 1300, 10.3390/foods12061300 | |
| 6. | Thornthan SAWANGWAN, Daleena KAJADMAN, Ratchanon KULCHANANIMIT, Determination of prebiotic properties of rice bran extract, 2024, 43, 2186-3342, 222, 10.12938/bmfh.2023-090 | |
| 7. | Xiao Lian, Mingyu Shi, Qinlu Lin, Ying Liang, Lingyu Zhang, Research progress of probiotics and fermented feed effects on pork quality, 2024, 3, 2770-2081, 83, 10.1002/fbe2.12082 | |
| 8. | Arnau Vilas-Franquesa, Melania Casertano, Anna Tresserra-Rimbau, Anna Vallverdú-Queralt, Cristian Torres-León, Recent advances in bio-based extraction processes for the recovery of bound phenolics from agro-industrial by-products and their biological activity, 2024, 64, 1040-8398, 10643, 10.1080/10408398.2023.2227261 | |
| 9. | Mehdi Akbari, Seyed Hadi Razavi, Faramarz Khodaiyan, Jesús Blesa, María J. Esteve, Fermented corn bran: A by-product with improved total phenolic content and antioxidant activity, 2023, 184, 00236438, 115090, 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.115090 | |
| 10. | Merve Tomas, Yuxi Wen, Wei Liao, Lizhu Zhang, Chao Zhao, David Julian McClements, Elifsu Nemli, Mustafa Bener, Resat Apak, Esra Capanoglu, Recent progress in promoting the bioavailability of polyphenols in plant-based foods, 2024, 1040-8398, 1, 10.1080/10408398.2024.2336051 | |
| 11. | Qinggele Borjihan, Zhan Yang, Kailonng Liu, Chengcong Yang, Xiaoyuan Zhang, Guoqiang Yao, Comparative genomics and metabolite analysis of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strains in dairy and vegetable fermentation environments, 2025, 65, 22124292, 106058, 10.1016/j.fbio.2025.106058 |
Figures(9) / Tables(3)
Ilenia Tinebra, Roberta Passafiume, Alessandra Culmone, Eristanna Palazzolo, Giuliana Garofalo, Vincenzo Naselli, Antonio Alfonzo, Raimondo Gaglio, Vittorio Farina. Boosting post-harvest quality of 'Coscia' pears: Antioxidant-enriched coating and MAP storage[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(4): 1151-1172. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024060
| Sample | Tocopherol | Gamma-oryzanol | Coumaric acid | Ferulic acid |
| A | 3.69 ± 0.29c | 1.55 ± 0.74c | ND | 18.91 ± 0.60d |
| B | 8.75 ± 1.11a | 2.57 ± 0.56ab | ND | 30.93 ± 0.81b |
| C | 4.09 ± 0.17c | 1.44 ± 0.36c | ND | 19.39 ± 0.56d |
| D | 3.35 ± 0.97c | 1.69 ± 0.35ab | ND | 18.86 ± 1.05d |
| E | 4.51 ± 0.38c | 3.16 ± 0.15a | 14.47 ± 1.20 | 35.23 ± 0.82a |
| F | 7.10 ± 0.23b | 2.31 ± 0.65abc | ND | 21.61 ± 0.66c |
| ND = not detected. Data are expressed as mean ± SD and the values in the same column with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. | ||||
DownLoad:
CSV
| Sample | Tocopherol | Gamma-oryzanol | Coumaric acid | Ferulic acid |
| A | 3.69 ± 0.29c | 1.55 ± 0.74c | ND | 18.91 ± 0.60d |
| B | 8.75 ± 1.11a | 2.57 ± 0.56ab | ND | 30.93 ± 0.81b |
| C | 4.09 ± 0.17c | 1.44 ± 0.36c | ND | 19.39 ± 0.56d |
| D | 3.35 ± 0.97c | 1.69 ± 0.35ab | ND | 18.86 ± 1.05d |
| E | 4.51 ± 0.38c | 3.16 ± 0.15a | 14.47 ± 1.20 | 35.23 ± 0.82a |
| F | 7.10 ± 0.23b | 2.31 ± 0.65abc | ND | 21.61 ± 0.66c |
| ND = not detected. Data are expressed as mean ± SD and the values in the same column with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. | ||||
