Editorial Special Issues

Mathematical and computational modeling of biological systems: advances and perspectives

  • The recent developments in the fields of mathematics and computer sciences have allowed a more accurate description of the dynamics of some biological systems. On the one hand new mathematical frameworks have been proposed and employed in order to gain a complete description of a biological system thus requiring the definition of complicated mathematical structures; on the other hand computational models have been proposed in order to give both a numerical solution of a mathematical model and to derive computation models based on cellular automata and agents. Experimental methods are developed and employed for a quantitative validation of the modeling approaches. This editorial article introduces the topic of this special issue which is devoted to the recent advances and future perspectives of the mathematical and computational frameworks proposed in biosciences.

    Citation: Carlo Bianca. Mathematical and computational modeling of biological systems: advances and perspectives[J]. AIMS Biophysics, 2021, 8(4): 318-321. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2021025

    Related Papers:

    [1] Carlo Bianca . Differential equations frameworks and models for the physics of biological systems. AIMS Biophysics, 2024, 11(2): 234-238. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2024013
    [2] Marco Menale, Bruno Carbonaro . The mathematical analysis towards the dependence on the initial data for a discrete thermostatted kinetic framework for biological systems composed of interacting entities. AIMS Biophysics, 2020, 7(3): 204-218. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2020016
    [3] Carlo Bianca . Interplay and multiscale modeling of complex biological systems. AIMS Biophysics, 2022, 9(1): 56-60. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2022005
    [4] Carlo Bianca . Theoretical frameworks and models for biological systems. AIMS Biophysics, 2020, 7(3): 167-168. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2020013
    [5] Ulrich Lüttge . Physics and the molecular revolution in plant biology: union needed for managing the future. AIMS Biophysics, 2016, 3(4): 501-521. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2016.4.501
    [6] Salvatore Magazù, Maria Teresa Caccamo . Scientific advances in complex systems of biophysical interest. AIMS Biophysics, 2023, 10(2): 241-246. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2023015
    [7] Ingo Dreyer . Plant potassium channels are in general dual affinity uptake systems. AIMS Biophysics, 2017, 4(1): 90-106. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2017.1.90
    [8] Bradley Vis, Jonathan J. Powell, Rachel E. Hewitt . Imaging flow cytometry methods for quantitative analysis of label-free crystalline silica particle interactions with immune cells. AIMS Biophysics, 2020, 7(3): 144-166. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2020012
    [9] Larisa A. Krasnobaeva, Ludmila V. Yakushevich . On the dimensionless model of the transcription bubble dynamics. AIMS Biophysics, 2023, 10(2): 205-219. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2023013
    [10] Disha Mohan Bangalore, Ingrid Tessmer . Unique insight into protein-DNA interactions from single molecule atomic force microscopy. AIMS Biophysics, 2018, 5(3): 194-216. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2018.3.194
  • The recent developments in the fields of mathematics and computer sciences have allowed a more accurate description of the dynamics of some biological systems. On the one hand new mathematical frameworks have been proposed and employed in order to gain a complete description of a biological system thus requiring the definition of complicated mathematical structures; on the other hand computational models have been proposed in order to give both a numerical solution of a mathematical model and to derive computation models based on cellular automata and agents. Experimental methods are developed and employed for a quantitative validation of the modeling approaches. This editorial article introduces the topic of this special issue which is devoted to the recent advances and future perspectives of the mathematical and computational frameworks proposed in biosciences.



    Biological systems are usually composed by a large number of elements which are able to interact each others and with the outside environment [1]. The evolution of a biological system is thus characterized by interactions which can trigger the onset of complex phenomena [2]. Indeed complexity is a key element which needs to be investigated before developing a modeling tool for a complex biological system. Among the many properties charactering a complex biological system, the ability of performing strategies is an important issue which complicates the modeling and requires a special attention [3]. Moreover some components of biological systems can be able to proliferate or mutate thus modifing the number and the type of elements.

    The observation scale is another issue which needs to be taken into account; some phenomena occur at a specific scale (micro, meso or macro), e.g. molecular, cellular. The temporal and the spatial scales thus need to be investigated [3]. The modeling approaches need to be proposed in order to avoid gaps among the scales.

    In the last two decades, many scholars have been involved in the modeling of complex biological systems. Different models have been proposed coming from the mathematical sciences and computational sciences. A brief overview of these approaches follows.

    Mathematical models. Biological systems have been firstly investigated by constructing models based on ordinary differential equations, briefly ODE-based models [4]; accordingly the time evolution of the density of the composing elements is obtained by analyzing the density of the all elements. The only independent variable is time. This approach is usually suitable at the macroscopic scale where the interacting populations can be reduced to the main actors. However this approach could be expensive if the number of the main actors is large.

    The methods of the continuum mechanics have been also suggested usually for the growth of biological matter and its behavior to physics/biological stress and strain [5]. This approach consists in partial differential equations where space and velocity are also independent variables. The evolution equations are obtained by employing conservation laws and constitutive relations.

    Recently kinetic theory models have been proposed for the modeling of a biological system at the cellular level, see [6] and the references cited therein; the evolution of the distribution function of cell populations is the main modeled element. The independent variables consist of an internal variable (strategy, function), velocity and space variables. The evolution equations, obtained by balancing the interactions into the elementary domain of the microscopic states, consist of partial-integro differential equations where the degree of nonlinearity is at least two. The definition of cellular interactions is at the base of this approach. It is worth stressing that in this approach the elements are also called structured population.

    Hybrid models, combining the above mentioned different mathematical approaches, is an interesting perspective and it is an important key of this special issue. Indeed any mathematical framework presents advantages et disadvantages which could be relaxed by coupling the mathematical frameworks at different scales.

    Computational models. The interest towards the development of computational models for biological systems is twofold. On the one hand a computational model could be of support of a mathematical model based on differential equations; on the other hand a computational model could be directly based on the methods of the information sciences. In this context the agent-based model has been the main approach largely employed in the last decade and recently the employment of multi-agent modeling have gained much attention [7],[8].

    The derivation of computational methods for the construction of the numerical solution to a mathematical model follows the methods of numerical analysis. Different numerical approaches exist in the pertinent literature which spam from classical numerical methods for ordinary differential equations [9] to finite element/spectral methods [10],[11] for partial differential equations. However this is a research domain which constantly increase then advances and perspectives in the context of biological systems constitutes an important part of this special issue.

    Concurrently, the information sciences has increased their interest in the modeling of biological systems. On the one hand the information sciences contributes to the numerical simulations of mathematical models by proposing a research activity in the development of computer and memory; on the other hand the information sciences has developed its computational models by employing agent-based models and recently multi-agent-based models [12]. In an agent-based model the actions and interactions of autonomous agents are defined; the interplay with game theory [13] and other computational sciences appears in the heuristic principles of the decisions and in the adaptation and learning processes. The advances and perspectives of these research fields are part of this special issue.

    In between the mathematical and computational models for biological systems, an important role is covered by the experimental methods. Empirical and experimental data play a crucial role in the quantitative validation of a modeling approach. This aspect cannot be neglected considering that the main scope of a modeling approach is the reproduction of the data and the prediction of future events or phenomena [14]. This is for instance the case of the COVID-19 pandemic which has shown the importance of new experimental methods for the detection and screening of the infection. Accordingly the advances in this research direction are also part of this special issue.

    It is worth stressing that the biosciences mentioned in this special issue are concerned with cellular biophysics, biomechanics, bioenergetics, and some applications in bioengineering such as biophysics membranes, neuro-biophysics, biophysical technology.



    [1] Bianca C, Bellomo N (2011) Towards a mathematical theory of complex biological systems. Series in Mathematical Biology and Medicine World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. doi: 10.1142/8085
    [2] Nicolis G, Nicolis C (2007) Foundations of complex systems: Nonlinear dynamics. Statistical Physics, Information and Prediction World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
    [3] Gosak M, Markovič R, Dolenšek J, et al. (2018) Network science of biological systems at different scales: A review. Phys Life Rev 24: 118-135. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2017.11.003
    [4] Deuflhard P, Röblitz S (2015) ODE models for systems biological networks. A Guide to Numerical Modelling in Systems Biology Cham: Springer, 1-32.
    [5] Chauvière A, Preziosi L, Verdier C (2010)  Cell mechanics: from single scale-based models to multiscale modeling London: Chapman and Hall/CRC. doi: 10.1201/9781420094558
    [6] Ben Amar M, Bianca C (2016) Towards a unified approach in the modeling of fibrosis: A review with research perspectives. Phys Life Re 17: 61-85. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2016.03.005
    [7] Bai Q, Ren F, Fujita K, et al. (2017)  Multi-agent and Complex Systems Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-2564-8
    [8] Heard D, Dent G, Schifeling T, et al. (2015) Agent-based models and microsimulation. Annu Rev Stat Its Appl 2: 259-272. doi: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-010814-020218
    [9] Städter P, Schälte Y, Schmiester L, et al. (2021) Benchmarking of numerical integration methods for ODE models of biological systems. Sci Rep 11: 2696. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82196-2
    [10] Sabat L, Kundu CK (2021) History of finite element method: a review. Recent Developments in Sustainable Infrastructure 75: 395-404. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-4577-1_32
    [11] Rai N, Mondal S (2021) Spectral methods to solve nonlinear problems: A review. Part Differ Equ Appl Math 4: 100043.
    [12] Van Liedekerke P, Palm MM, Jagiella N, et al. (2015) Simulating tissue mechanics with agent-based models: concepts, perspectives and some novel results. Comput Part Mech 2: 401-444. doi: 10.1007/s40571-015-0082-3
    [13] Perea A, Predtetchinski A (2019) An epistemic approach to stochastic games. Int J Game Theory 48: 181-203. doi: 10.1007/s00182-018-0644-8
    [14] Hasdemir D, Hoefsloot HCJ, Smilde AK (2015) Validation and selection of ODE based systems biology models: how to arrive at more reliable decisions. BMC Syst Biol 9: 32. doi: 10.1186/s12918-015-0180-0
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3491) PDF downloads(237) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog