Research article

Competitiveness of South Africa's agri-food commodities

  • Received: 15 July 2021 Accepted: 26 October 2021 Published: 12 November 2021
  • This research aims to determine the competitiveness of South African agri-food products and the factors that influence them. The study applied a comparative advantage (RCA) index, Lafay Index (LFI), Export Diversification Index (EDI), Major export category (MEC), Hirschman index (HI), and regression analysis. The study revealed a mixed result of RCA and LFI of agri-food commodities during 2000–2018. Some commodities such as tobacco and rawhides have a comparative advantage. On the other hand, vegetables, fruit, and coffee showed a comparative disadvantage. At the same time, the LFI revealed a significant comparative advantage from 2000 to 2003 for agri-food commodities of fish and sugar, sugar preparations, and honey. EDI was near zero for all commodities, indicating that the trading structure was less concentrated. Hirschman index (HI) demonstrated that all commodities showed a reduced concentration throughout the study period. The results of regression analysis on factors that influence the competitiveness of agri-food commodities were varied. Agriculture productivity and GDP per capita had a favorable impact on comparative advantage. Macroeconomic stability had a mixed result, with agri-food commodities having positive and negative effects. South Africa had a less concentrated trade structure and did not depend on international trade from the agri-food industry. These evaluations provide policymakers with information on agri-food competitiveness and the factors that influence the industry's competitiveness.

    Citation: Yonas T. Bahta. Competitiveness of South Africa's agri-food commodities[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(4): 945-968. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021057

    Related Papers:

    [1] Dominique Meekers , Raseliarison Ratovonanahary , Tokinirina Andrianantoandro , Hiangotiana Randrianarisoa . Using Survey Data to Identify Opportunities to Reach Women with An Unmet Need for Family Planning: The Example of Madagascar. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(3): 629-643. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.3.629
    [2] Waled Amen Mohammed Ahmed, Sara Boutros Shokai, Insaf Hassan Abduelkhair, Amira Yahia Boshra . Factors Affecting Utilization of Family Planning Services in a Post-Conflict Setting, South Sudan: A Qualitative Study. AIMS Public Health, 2015, 2(4): 655-666. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.4.655
    [3] Sumbal Javed, Vijay Kumar Chattu . Patriarchy at the helm of gender-based violence during COVID-19. AIMS Public Health, 2021, 8(1): 32-35. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021003
    [4] Maryam Batool, Muhammad Farman, Aqeel Ahmad, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar . Mathematical study of polycystic ovarian syndrome disease including medication treatment mechanism for infertility in women. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(1): 19-35. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024002
    [5] Henry V. Doctor . Assessing Antenatal Care and Newborn Survival in Sub-Saharan Africa within the Context of Renewed Commitments to Save Newborn Lives. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(3): 432-447. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.3.432
    [6] Peter Oyovwe, Gillian Woolhead . Exploring health care professionals' and women's perspectives on the barriers to maternal health services: a qualitative study in Eku Town of Delta State, Nigeria. AIMS Public Health, 2021, 8(1): 154-171. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021012
    [7] Soo-Foon Moey, Norfariha Che Mohamed, Bee-Chiu Lim . A path analytic model of health beliefs on the behavioral adoption of breast self-examination. AIMS Public Health, 2021, 8(1): 15-31. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021002
    [8] Soo-Foon Moey, Aaina Mardhiah Abdul Mutalib, Norfariha Che Mohamed, Nursyahirah Saidin . The relationship of socio-demographic characteristics and knowledge of breast cancer on stage of behavioral adoption of breast self-examination. AIMS Public Health, 2020, 7(3): 620-633. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020049
    [9] Penelope Chirambira, Sphiwe Madiba, Busisiwe Ntuli . Societal and individual drivers of fertility desires and intentions among people living with HIV: a cross sectional study of HIV clinic attendees in Soweto, South Africa. AIMS Public Health, 2022, 9(1): 173-184. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2022013
    [10] Eduardo Fricovsky, Mudassar Iqbal Arain, Binh Tran, Phuong Thao Nguyen, Tuyet Phan, Natalie Chang . Assessing the impact of a health education outreach project on cervical cancer awareness among Vietnamese-American women in San Diego. AIMS Public Health, 2022, 9(3): 552-558. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2022038
  • This research aims to determine the competitiveness of South African agri-food products and the factors that influence them. The study applied a comparative advantage (RCA) index, Lafay Index (LFI), Export Diversification Index (EDI), Major export category (MEC), Hirschman index (HI), and regression analysis. The study revealed a mixed result of RCA and LFI of agri-food commodities during 2000–2018. Some commodities such as tobacco and rawhides have a comparative advantage. On the other hand, vegetables, fruit, and coffee showed a comparative disadvantage. At the same time, the LFI revealed a significant comparative advantage from 2000 to 2003 for agri-food commodities of fish and sugar, sugar preparations, and honey. EDI was near zero for all commodities, indicating that the trading structure was less concentrated. Hirschman index (HI) demonstrated that all commodities showed a reduced concentration throughout the study period. The results of regression analysis on factors that influence the competitiveness of agri-food commodities were varied. Agriculture productivity and GDP per capita had a favorable impact on comparative advantage. Macroeconomic stability had a mixed result, with agri-food commodities having positive and negative effects. South Africa had a less concentrated trade structure and did not depend on international trade from the agri-food industry. These evaluations provide policymakers with information on agri-food competitiveness and the factors that influence the industry's competitiveness.



    Burnout is a common psychosocial phenomenon among health care workers. World Health Organization (WHO) defined Burn-out as an occupational phenomenon, “a syndrome conceptualized as resulting from chronic workplace stress that has not been successfully managed” [1]. It is composed of three dimensions: emotional exhaustion (EE), characterized by the sensation of physical and mental overexertion and lack of energy; (ii) depersonalization (DP) characterized by emotional detachment and negative attitudes towards patients and colleagues; and (iii) low personal accomplishment (PA), the degree to which a person perceives doing well on worthwhile tasks [2]. Burnout had negative effects on the employees, by causing different physical and mental problems and also on the organization, by decreasing the quality of care provided for patients and decreasing productivity [3]. A recent meta-analysis study that investigated burnout among nursing found a prevalence of 28% for high emotional exhaustion, 15% for high depersonalization and 31% for low personal accomplishment [4]. Burnout was associated with many sources of stress in the workplace such as work overload, long working hours, lack of resources and conflict with colleagues in addition to sociodemographic characteristics such as gender, age and years of experience. Previous studies in Saudi Arabia have been conducted among nurses in tertiary hospitals but not in the primary health care centers [5][8]. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and associated factors of burnout among nurses working in the primary health care centers in Medina city, Saudi Arabia.

    This observational analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 200 nurses in the primary health care centers (PHC) in Medina city, Saudi Arabia. Al Madinah was divided into four regions, and three PHC centers were selected randomly from each region. All nurses in each center were approached. Those who had an experience of less than one-year were excluded.

    A self-administered questionnaire consisting of three parts was used in this study. The first part included questions on the sociodemographic characteristics. Level of education was categorized into two categories; Bachelor of Science Nursing (BSN; 4 years study and one-year internship) and Diploma in nursing (DN: three years study and 6 months internship).

    The second part assessed burnout by using the validated Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) which is the most commonly used tool for assessing burnout. It consists of 22 items which are divided into three subscales: emotional exhaustion, 9 items (the feelings of being emotionally overrun and exhausted by one's work); depersonalization, 5 items (the tendency to view others as objects rather than as feeling persons) and personal accomplishment, 8 items (the degree to which a person perceives doing well on worthwhile tasks). The items are answered in a 7-point scale ranging from 0 (never) to 6 (every day) [2]. The three scores are calculated for each respondent. High scores for EE and DP indicated higher levels of burnout, while high scores for PA indicated lower levels of burnout. This instrument was validated in many languages including Arabic language [9]. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the three MBI subscales of the Arabic version were: emotional exhaustion (alpha = 0.88), depersonalization (alpha = 0.78), personal accomplishment (alpha = 0.89) [9] High level of burnout is defined in this study as high score on any of the three subscales of burnout [9],[10]. Sources of stress were assessed by 10 items which were obtained from the literature [10]. These items were headed by the following question: “to which extent dose the following conditions cause stress to you”. Each item was scored from zero (causing no stress) to 4 (causing severe stress) [10].

    Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Directorate of Health in Al-Madinah. Objectives and benefits of the study were explained to the participants. Participants confidentiality and anonymity were assured. Signed consents were obtained from the participants.

    Analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS®) (version 22.0, IBM, Armonk, NY). The 22 items of MBI were summed to obtain the total score of each subscale [2].

    Each subscale was categorized into low, moderate and high according to the recommended cut-off points [9]. Test of normality was performed for each subscale. T-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) test were used to assess the association between burnout subscales and the sociodemographic variables. Pearson Correlation coefficient was used to assess the association between burnout subscales and the sources of stress. To obtain the significant factors associated with each subscale of burnout, multiple linear regression analysis was employed by using “Backward” technique. Multi-collinearity was checked between the independent variables by using the VIF. The accepted level of significance was below 0.05 (p < 0.05).

    Most participants were females (73.0%), aged ≤35 years (52.0%), married (81.0%) and had >10 years of service. Most of them had no administrative work (80.0%), had diploma (75.0%) and had a monthly income of less than 12 thousand Saudi Rial (SAR) (53.0%) (Table 1).

    Table 1.  Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants.
    n %
    Age
     ≤35 104 52.0
     >35 96 48.0
    Gender
     Male 54 27.0
     Female 146 73.0
    Marital status
     Single 30 15.0
     Married 162 81.0
     Divorced/widower 8 4.0
    Educational level
     Diploma 150 75.0
     Bachelor 50 25.0
    Years of service
     5 or less 32 16.0
     6–10 57 28.5
     >10 111 55.5
    Administrative task
     Yes 40 20.0
     No 160 80.0
    Monthly income (SAR)*
     <12000 106 53.0
     ≥12000 94 47.0

    Note: *1 USD = 3.7 SAR.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    About 39% had high EE, 38% had high DP and 85.5% had low PA. Forty-five participants (22.5%) scored high on all the three subscale of burnout and 178 scored high at least on one subscale of burnout (89%) (Table 2). The reliability analysis of the three subscales yielded Cronbach alpha of 0.84 for EE, 0.76 for DP and 0.85 for PA.

    Table 2.  Prevalence of burnout among participants.
    Low n (%) Moderate n (%) High n (%)
    EE 72 (36) 50 (25) 78 (39)
    DP 46 (23) 78 (39) 76 (38)
    PA 171 (85.5) 11 (5.5) 18 (9.0)

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The most important sources of stress were long working hours, work overload, fear of violence and lack of resources (Table 3).

    Table 3.  Sources of stress in the workplace ranked by mean.
    Item Mean
    Long working hours 3.161
    Work overload 2.779
    Fear of violence 2.623
    Lack of resources 2.588
    Work demands affect my personal homelife 2.362
    Fear of making mistake that can lead to serious consequences 2.302
    Working with uncooperative colleagues 2.302
    Poor work environment 2.281
    Office work 1.985
    Cannot participate in decision-making 1.995

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 4.  Relationship between burnout and socio-demographic characteristics.
    Variables Nurses' burnout
    EE
    DP
    PA
    Mean (SD) P value Mean (SD) P value Mean (SD) P value
    Age
     ≤35 21.4 (11.5) 8.9 (5.0) 21.2(5.8)
     >35 24.9 (13.5) 0.041 9.6 (6.4) 0.348 16.1(5.5) 0.002
    Gender
     Male 23.4 (13.4) 9.2 (5.2) 17.9 (6.2)
     Female 22.9 (12.2) 0.807 9.3 (5.1) 0.855 19.0 (5.0) 0.502
    Marital status
     Single 22.2 (13.1) 8.9 (5.2) 20.0(5.4)
     Married 23.2 (12.5) 9.3 (5.7) 18.3(5.1)
     Divorced/widower 22.6 (13.8) 0.910 9.3 (7.2) 0.926 17.7(6.2) 0.794
    Educational level
     Diploma 21.2 (12.8) 9.2 (5.8) 20.8 (5.4)
     University 28.4 (10.3) <0.001 9.4 (5.5) 0.800 14.2 (7.2) 0.001
    Years of service
     5 or less 22.8 (12.1) 8.3 (4.5) 22.8 (4.2)
     6–10 21.9 (11.3) 9.4 (5.3) 19.4 (6.4)
     >10 23.7 (13.3) 0.658 9.4 (6.2) 0.627 17.3 (5.7) 0.060
    Administrative task
     Yes 22.4 (11.2) 8.7 (5.4) 23.2 (6.5)
     No 23.2 (12.9) 0.727 9.4 (5.8) 0.464 17.7 (7.4) 0.021
    Monthly income (SAR)
     <12000 24.6 (11.8) 10.5 (5.5) 26.3 (6.4)
     ≥12000 22.0 (12.9) 0.138 8.4 (5.7) 0.014 25.5 (5.6) 0.921

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In univariate analysis, emotional exhaustion score was significantly higher among those aged >35 years (24.9 ± 13.5) compared to those aged ≤35 years (21.4 ± 11.5), (p = 0.041), and among those who had Bachelor degree (28.4 ± 10.3) compared to those who had diploma (21.2 ± 12.8), (p < 0.001) (Table 4).

    EE was correlated positively and significantly with all the ten sources of stress (r coefficient ranged from 0.379 to 0.586), (p < 0.001) (Table 5). DP was higher among those who had an income of <12000 SAR (10.5 ± 5.5) compared to those with income of ≥12000 (8.4 ± 3.7), (p = 0.014) (Table 4). DP was correlated positively and significantly with all the ten sources of stress (r coefficient ranged from 0.198 to 0.368), (p < 0.005) (Table 5). PA was significantly lower among those who aged >35 years (16.1 ± 5.5) compared to those aged ≤35 years (21.2 ± 5.8), (p = 0.002), among those who had university degree (14.2 ± 7.2) compared to those who had diploma (20.8 ± 5.4), (p = 0.001) and among those who had not administrative task (17.7 ± 7.4) compared to those who had (23.2 ± 6.5), (p = 0.021) (Table 4).

    Table 5.  Relationship between burnout and sources of stress in the workplace.
    Item EE
    DP
    PA
    Coefficient P value Coefficient P value Coefficient P value
    Work overload 0.495 <0.001 0.204 0.004 −0.106 0.135
    Long working hours 0.379 <0.001 0.198 0.005 −0.007. 0.926
    Fear of violence 0.422 <0.001 0.216 0.002 −0.100 0.161
    Poor work environment 0.586 <0.001 0.368 <0.001 −0.219 0.002
    Lack of resources 0.511 <0.001 0.301 <0.001 −0.086 0.228
    Fear of making mistake that can lead to serious consequences 0.428 <0.001 0.220 <0.001 −0.097 0.174
    Working with uncooperative colleagues 0.362 <0.001 0.197 0.005 −0.064 0.365
    Office work 0.340 <0.001 0.273 <0.001 −0.055 0.436
    Cannot participate in decision-making 0.424 <0.001 0.329 <0.001 −0.028 0.697
    Work demands affect my personal home life 0.525 <0.001 0.249 <0.001 −0.0091 0.200

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In multivariate analysis, significant predictors of EE were work overload (p = 0.010), poor work environment (p < 0.001), lack of resources (p = 0.033), working with uncooperative colleagues (p = 0.005), work demands affect personal homelife (p < 0.001) and having university education (p < 0.001) (Table 6). Significant predictors of DP were poor work environment (p < 0.001), “cannot participate in decision-making” (p = 0.041) and low income (<12000 SAR) (Table 6). Low personal accomplishment was significantly predicted by age (>35 years) (p=0.001), educational level (university), (p = 0.004) and no administrative task (p = 0.003) (Table 6).

    Table 6.  Factors associated with burnout in multivariate analysis.
    B SE Beta P value VIF
    Emotional exhaustion
    Work overload 1.636 0.63 0.170 0.010 1.688
    Poor work environment 3.134 0.68 0.318 <0.001 1.887
    Lack of resources 1.473 0.68 0.148 0.033 1.853
    Fear of making mistake that can lead to serious consequences 1.038 0.59 0.110 0.082 1.565
    Working with uncooperative colleagues 1.875 0.65 −0.199 0.005 1.907
    Work demands affect my personal home life 2.226 0.56 0.267 <0.001 1.774
    University (reference = diploma) 6.009 1.51 0.206 <0.001 1.052
    Depersonalization
    Poor work environment 1.246 0.35 0.278 <0.001 1.246
    Cannot participate in decision-making 0.702 0.35 0.156 0.041 0.702
    Monthly income less than 12K SAR −1.776 0.76 −0.0152 0.021 −1.776
    Personal accomplishment
    Age (>35) −5.550 1.59 −0.0234 0.001 1.009
    Educational level (Bachelor) −5.354 1.82 −0.0196 0.004 1.001
    No administrative task −5.960 1.98 −0.0201 0.003 1.010

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The primary aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of burnout and its associated factors among nurses in the primary health care setting. This study found 89% of the participants scored high at least on one subscale of burnout. Low personal accomplishment was found among 89% of nurses while high EE and high DP were reported by 39%, and 38% respectively. Moderate level of burnout was found among 25% (EE), 39% (DP) and 5.5% (PA). The overall prevalence of burnout in this study was 89%.

    Previous studies among nurses in Saudi Arabia found that 32 % to 71.6% of nurses had high levels of burnout [5][8]. It was found by Al-Turki et al. that 45% of nurses had high EE, 42% had high depersonalization and 71.5% had low personal accomplishment. [5] Another study from Saudi Arabia found that 71.6 % of nurses had high level of burnout. [7] Another study from Saudi Arabia reported that 42% of nurses had moderate level of stress. [8] However, these two previous studies did not define the cut-off point for burnout. All the other mentioned studies used Maslach burnout inventory.

    A recent study from Egypt found that 54.6% of nurses had average levels of emotional exhaustion, 48% scored high on depersonalization, and 77.5% had low personal accomplishment [11]. Another study from Egypt found that 52.8% of nurses experienced high EE, 7.2% had high level of DP and 96.5% had low PA [12]. A study among Iranian nurses found that 25% of the participants had high level of burnout. [13] A study of nurses in Israel reported that 30.8% reported high emotional exhaustion, 5.1% had high depersonalization, and 84.6% had low personal accomplishment [14]. In Jordan 55% of nurses reported high level of emotional exhaustion, 50% reported high level of depersonalization, and 50% reported low personal accomplishment [15]. A recent international meta-analysis study that investigated burnout among nurses found that 28% of nurses had high level emotional exhaustion, 15% had high level of depersonalization and 31% had low personal accomplishment [4]. Regarding factors associated with burnout, this study found that high emotional exhaustion was associated with age group, level of education, and with sources of stress in the work place such as work overload, lack of resources, uncooperative colleagues, and poor working environment. DP was associated with low income, poor working environment and inability to participate in decision-making. Low PA was associated with age group, level of education and no engagement in administrative work.

    While some studies had not found association between burnout and socio-demographic factors, [8] some other studies had found a significant association between burnout and age, marital status and education level [5],[7]. However, there is a great agreement between studies that burnout is associated with stress and sources of stress in the workplace [15][20].

    That sources of stress in the workplace included role conflict, work overload, conflict with colleagues, long working hours, poor working environment and low supervisor support. A previous meta-analysis study found that job insecurity, low job control, low reward, high demands and high work load increased the risk for developing burnout [21].

    Long-term exposure to stressors was found to affect the professional quality of life, leading to cognitive and emotional distress and burnout [22]. Continuous effort in stressful, demanding tasks can have physiological and psychological impacts, such as increased heart rate and prolonged stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system. This is well recognized to be associated with exhaustion, particularly when the workload is high. Long working hours was found to be associated with emotional exhaustion because it produces excessive demands and disrupt family life and ability to trail outside interests [15][17].

    This finding emphasis that any effort to manage burnout should be directed toward the management of sources of stress in the work place. Burnout was also found to be affected by other factors rather than work related factors and stressors in the work place. It was found in the previous studies that Alexithymic personality trait increased likelihood to experience burnout and has a negative effect on the professional quality of life among. radiation oncologists [23],[24]. In addition, emotional intelligence was found to be linked with all the three parts of burnout [25]. Emotional intelligence is defined as the ability to perceive emotion, integrate emotion to facilitate thought, understand emotions, and regulate emotions to promote personal growth [26].

    This study found that 89% of the participants scored high at least on one subscale of burnout. Burnout was associated mainly with work related sources of stress. A comprehensive interventional approach is needed to minimize and prevent burnout among nurses in the primary health care centers. There were three types of interventions to manage burnout: individual-focused, organizational, and combine interventions. Individual-focused interventions included self-care workshops, stress management skills, communication skills training, yoga, mindfulness, meditation and coping programs. Organizational interventions aimed mainly to reduces stress and to mitigate the impact of stressors in the workplace; they included workload or schedule-rotation, stress management training program, access to peer mentoring, help and guidance from experienced work colleagues and teamwork/transitions. Individual and organizational interventions should be combined to effectively reduce burnout among healthcare providers. It would be also of great interest if future studies investigate which personality factors are associated with burnout in nursing working in primary health care centers. This will help to prioritize intervention to focus on nurses with high risk personality trait. Interventions to improve emotional intelligence are also recommended. Poulsen & Poulsen (2018) proposed a Self-Determination Theory and they suggested two steps to prevent burnout during early career. The first step was to educate trainers and trainees about times when individuals may be vulnerable to work stress. Learning how to recognize the warning signs of burnout and being aware of vulnerability is a vital first step. Education about the need for self-awareness and importance of self-care would occur in the early stages of training. The next step involved alerting practitioners regarding the extent and accessibility of information regarding evidence-based strategies that can be employed to address exhaustion and prevent disengagement [27].



    [1] Montalbano P, Nenci S, Salvatici L (2015) Trade, value chains, and food security. Background paper prepared for The State of Agricultural Commodity Markets, 2015-16. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy.
    [2] Webber CM, Labaste P (2011) Building competitiveness in Africa's agriculture: A guide to value chain concepts and applications. World Bank Publications.
    [3] Van Schalkwyk H (2017) Competitiveness and Sustainability of South Africa Agriculture. FERTASA, 57th Annual congress, 3 and 4 May 2017. KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
    [4] NDP (National Development Plan) (2011) National Development Plan 2030: Our future-make it work. Pretoria: Presidency of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
    [5] ANDE (Aspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs) (2017) Aspen network of development entrepreneurs. Available from: https://2017.andeglobal.org/report/capacity/?filter=south-africa%20.
    [6] Kotze I, Rose M (2015) Farming and future: reconnecting South Africa's food systems to its ecosystems. Available from: http://awsassets.wwf.org.za/downloads/wwf006_ffl_report_low_res.pdf.
    [7] Von Bormann T(2019) Agri-food syatems: facts and Futures: How South Africa can produce 50% more by 2050. WWF South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa.
    [8] ITC (The International Trade Centre) (2010) South Africa: A potential market for agri-food products from Africa. Technical paper. The International Trade Centre (ITC), Geneva, Switzerland.
    [9] Purchase J (2018) Five major trends in South Africa's agro-food system. Available from: https://www.bizcommunity.com/Article/196/718/172164.html (Accessed 06 May 2021).
    [10] Bojnec S, Ferto I (2009) Agro-food trade competitiveness of Central European and Balkan countries. Food Policy 34: 417-425. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.01.003
    [11] Kirsten J, Kandiero T, NgqangweniS, Gebrehiwet Y (2004) The SADC countries and the uruguay round agreement on agriculture: a review of progress and challenges. Technical report prepared for the World Bank.
    [12] Khor M (2005) The commodities crisis and the global trade in agriculture: Problem and Proposal. Third World network.
    [13] Bahta YT, Willemse J (2016) The Comparative advantage of South Africa Soybean production. OCL 23: A301 (1-8).
    [14] Esterhuizen D, van Rooyen J, D'Haese I (2006) An evaluation of the competitiveness of the agribusiness sector in South African. Competition Forum: Indiana 4: 72-85.
    [15] Sharma KD, Pathanala MS, Lal H (2010) Value chain analysis and financial viability of agro-processing industries in Himachal Pradesh. Agric Econ Res Rev 23: 515-522.
    [16] Henchion M, McIntyre B (2005) Market access and competitiveness issues for food SMEs in Europe's lagging rural regions (LRRs). Bri Food J 107: 404-422. doi: 10.1108/00070700510602183
    [17] Mbai S, Moses EN, Bahta YT (2021) Export Competitiveness of Namibia's timber sector: Implication for forestry sector. For Ideas 27: 101-113.
    [18] Louw A, Troskie G, Geyser M (2013) Small millers' and bakers' perceptions of the limitations of agri-processing development in the wheat-milling and baking industries in rural areas in South Africa. Agrekon 52: 101-122. doi: 10.1080/03031853.2013.821746
    [19] Mlambo C, Mukaurumbwa P, Megbown E (2019) An investigation of the contribution of processed and unprocessed agricultural exports to economic growth in South Africa. Cogent Econ Finance 7: 1-16. doi: 10.1080/23322039.2019.1694234
    [20] Bojnec S (2001) Trade and revealed comparative advantage measures: regional and Central and East European agricultural trade. Eastern Eur Econ 39: 72-98. doi: 10.1080/00128775.2001.11040990
    [21] Bojnec S, Ferto I (2010) Southeastern European agrofood trade specialization. Eastern Eur Econ 48: 22-51. doi: 10.2753/EEE0012-8775480302
    [22] Bojnec S, Ferto I (2012) Complementarities of trade advantage and trade competitiveness measures. Appl Econ 44: 399-408. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2010.508725
    [23] Baena-Rojas J, Herrero-Olarte S (2020) From preferential trade arrangements to free trade agreements: One of the downturns of cooperation in international relations? Soc Sci 9: 139.
    [24] UN Comtrade (United Nations Commodity Trade Statistics) (2020) United Nations Commodity Trade Statistics. Available from: http://comtrade.un.org/data.
    [25] FAOSTAT (Food and Agriculture Organization Statistical database) (2020) FAO Database. Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data.
    [26] WB (World Bank) (2020) World Development Indicators: Export Diversification Index. Available from: http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators.
    [27] UN (United Nations) (2006) Standard International Trade Classification. Revision 4. Available from: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/SeriesM/SeriesM_34rev4E.pdf.
    [28] Balassa B (1965) Trade liberalization and Revealed comparative advantage. Manchester Sch Econ Soc Stud 33: 99-125. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x
    [29] Zaghini A (2005) Evolution of Trade Patterns in the New EU Member States. Econ Transit 13: 629-658. doi: 10.1111/j.0967-0750.2005.00235.x
    [30] Lafay G (1992) The measurement of revealed comparative advantage. International Trade Modeling. London: Chapman and Hill.
    [31] De Benedictis L, Tamberi M (2004) Overall specialization empirics: techniques and applications. Open Econ Rev 15: 323-346. doi: 10.1023/B:OPEN.0000048522.97418.99
    [32] Balassa B (1977) Revealed comparative advantage revisited: An analysis of relative export shares of the industrialized countries, 1953-1971. Manchester Sch Econ Soc Stud 45: 327-344. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9957.1977.tb00701.x
    [33] Matkovski B, Kalas B, Stanislav Zekic S, et al. (2019) Agri-food competitiveness in southeast Europe. Outlook Agr 48: 1-10. doi: 10.1177/0030727019854770
    [34] Mikic M (2005) Introduction to trade research Ⅱ: Trade data and statistics: ARTNeT capacity building workshop on trade research 22-25 March 2005.
    [35] Ballance RH, Forstner H, Murray T (1987) Consistency tests of alternative measures of comparative advantage. Rev Econ Stat 69: 157-161. doi: 10.2307/1937915
    [36] Bowen H (1983) On the theoretical interpretation of indices of trade intensity and revealed comparative advantage. Rev World Econ 119: 464-472.
    [37] Sanidas E, Shin SY (2015) Comparison of Revealed Comparative Advantage Indices with Application to Trade Tendencies of East Asian Countries. Department of Economics, Seoul National University.
    [38] UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) (2004) United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Handbook on Statistics. New York and Geneva: United Nation.
    [39] WB (World Bank) (2013) Export Diversification Index. Available from: http://www.worldbank.org/.
    [40] Nin-Pratt A, Diao X, Bahta YT (2009) How important is a regional free trade area for Southern Africa? Potential impacts and structural constraints. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Discussion Paper 888.
    [41] Lovre K (2016) Technical change in the agricultural development of the Western Balkan countries. In: Tomic D, Lovre K, Subie J, et al. (Eds.), Emerging Technologies and the Development of Agriculture. Novi Sad: Proceeding of Serbian Association of Agricultural Economists 152 Seminar, Belgrade: Serbia, 1-14.
    [42] Jambor A, Babu S (2016) Competitiveness of Global agriculture- policy lesson from food security. Switzerland. Springer International.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Zin Wai Htay, Junko Kiriya, Jennifer Lisa Sakamoto, Masamine Jimba, Association Between Women’s Empowerment and Unmet Family Planning Needs in Low- and Middle-Income Countries in Southeast Asia: A Cross-Sectional Study, 2023, 2329-3691, 1, 10.1080/23293691.2023.2174822
    2. Christopher Hogan, Gouranga Lal Dasvarma, Udoy Saikia, Explaining the role of proximate and indirect determinants on fertility decline in Timor-Leste, 2024, 1744-1730, 1, 10.1080/17441730.2024.2436210
    3. Paola Borquez-Arce, Chiara E. Sumich, Raimundo da Costa, Gabriela Guizzo-Dri, Phoebe R. Spencer, Katherine Sanders, Debra S. Judge, Women’s Life Trajectories in Rural Timor-Leste: A Life History and Life Course Perspective on Reproduction and Empowerment, 2025, 14, 2076-0760, 203, 10.3390/socsci14040203
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4108) PDF downloads(354) Cited by(6)

Figures and Tables

Figures(1)  /  Tables(10)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog