Microbiological quality in convenient ready-to-eat vegetables during shelf life

Cátia Morgado; José M. Pestana; Manuela M. Guerra; Carlos Brandão; Cátia Morgado; José M. Pestana; Manuela M. Guerra; Carlos Brandão

doi:10.3934/agrfood.2018.4.372

AIMS Agriculture and Food

2018, Volume 3, Issue 4: 372-383. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2018.4.372

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Topical Sections

Microbiological quality in convenient ready-to-eat vegetables during shelf life

Laboratório de Microbiologia, Escola Superior de Hotelaria e Turismo do Estoril, Av. Condes de Barcelona, nº 808, 2769-510 Estoril, Portugal

Received: 19 July 2018 Accepted: 10 September 2018 Published: 19 October 2018

Minimally processed vegetables and fruits are the main ingredients of ready-to-eat salads, often sold in convenient packaging. The increased consumption of ready-to-eat products is a result of a fast lifestyle and awareness on their nutritional attributes. Additionally, the processing technology is well documented. This study aimed to determine the microbiological quality of shredded Iceberg lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. capitata), sliced tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and diced mango (Mangifera indica L.). From each batch, five random units were selected, one of which was analyzed on the day of production (initial sample—IS) and the other four after their shelf life (final sample—FS). The samples were tested for aerobic colony count (ACC) 30 °C, Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Aeromonas hydrophila, molds and yeasts. The results showed that ACC of diced mango and shredded lettuce had a similar median of 6.20 and 6.08 log g⁻¹_,respectively, and sliced tomato had the lowest one (5.40 log g⁻¹). The median value found for Enterobacteriaceae was 3.47 log g⁻¹. The FS for Enterococcus of diced mango and shredded lettuce had a similar median (1.00 log g⁻¹) and sliced tomato had the highest (2.54 log g⁻¹). Both IS and FS had higher unsatisfactory rate for Aeromonas hydrophila. All samples revealed acceptable rate for molds and yeasts. This study found high microbial loads in ready to eat vegetables. Data showed that this type of product should be subject to a more stringent quality control, so that the consumers could be provided not only with easy to consume products but also with microbiological quality products during their shelf life.
- ready to eat vegetables,
- hygiene,
- microbiology quality,
- convenient packaging
Citation: Cátia Morgado, José M. Pestana, Manuela M. Guerra, Carlos Brandão. Microbiological quality in convenient ready-to-eat vegetables during shelf life[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2018, 3(4): 372-383. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2018.4.372

Related Papers:

Abstract

Minimally processed vegetables and fruits are the main ingredients of ready-to-eat salads, often sold in convenient packaging. The increased consumption of ready-to-eat products is a result of a fast lifestyle and awareness on their nutritional attributes. Additionally, the processing technology is well documented. This study aimed to determine the microbiological quality of shredded Iceberg lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. capitata), sliced tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and diced mango (Mangifera indica L.). From each batch, five random units were selected, one of which was analyzed on the day of production (initial sample—IS) and the other four after their shelf life (final sample—FS). The samples were tested for aerobic colony count (ACC) 30 °C, Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Aeromonas hydrophila, molds and yeasts. The results showed that ACC of diced mango and shredded lettuce had a similar median of 6.20 and 6.08 log g⁻¹_,respectively, and sliced tomato had the lowest one (5.40 log g⁻¹). The median value found for Enterobacteriaceae was 3.47 log g⁻¹. The FS for Enterococcus of diced mango and shredded lettuce had a similar median (1.00 log g⁻¹) and sliced tomato had the highest (2.54 log g⁻¹). Both IS and FS had higher unsatisfactory rate for Aeromonas hydrophila. All samples revealed acceptable rate for molds and yeasts. This study found high microbial loads in ready to eat vegetables. Data showed that this type of product should be subject to a more stringent quality control, so that the consumers could be provided not only with easy to consume products but also with microbiological quality products during their shelf life.

References

[1]	Lamikanra O (2002) Fresh-cut Fruits and Vegetables: Science, Technology and Market. CRC Press.
[2]	International Commission Microbiological Specifications for Food (2005) Microrganisms in Foods 6: Microbial Ecology of Food Commodities. 2 ed. Nova Iorque: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
[3]	Oliveira MA, Souza VM, Bergamini AMM, et al. (2011) Microbiology quality of ready-to-eat minimally processed vegetables consumed in Brazil. Food Control 22: 1400–1403. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.02.020
[4]	Beirão-da-Costa S, Steiner A, Correia L, et al. (2006) Effects of maturity stage and mild heat treatments on quality of minimally processed kiwifruit. J Food Eng 76: 616–625. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.06.012
[5]	Rosa C, Sapata M, Guerra MM (2007) Chemical and sensory characteristics and microbiological safety of fresh finely cut parsley packed in modified atmosphere. Food Control 18: 1008–1012. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2006.06.006
[6]	Beirão-da-Costa S, Cardoso A, Martins LL, et al. (2008) The effect of calcium dips combined with mild heating of whole kiwifruit for fruit slices quality maintenance. Food Chem 108: 191–197. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.10.075
[7]	Lambert JL, Batalha MO, Sproesser RL, et al. (2005) As principais evoluções dos comportamentos alimentares: o caso da França. Rev Nutr 18: 577–591. doi: 10.1590/S1415-52732005000500001
[8]	Valentin-Bon I, Jacobson A, Monday SR, et al. (2008) Microbiological quality of bagged cut spinach and lettuce mixes. Appl Environ Microb 74: 1240–1242. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02258-07
[9]	Pinheiro NMS, Figueiredo EAT, Figueiredo RW, et al. (2005) Avaliação da qualidade microbiológica de frutos minimamente processados comercializados em supermercados de Fortaleza. Rev Bras Frutic 27: 153–156. doi: 10.1590/S0100-29452005000100040
[10]	Smanioto TF, Pirolo NJ, Simionato EMRS, et al. (2009) Qualidade microbiológica de frutas e hortaliças minimamente processadas. Rev Inst Adolfo Lutz 68: 150–154.
[11]	Ray B, Bhunia A (2013) Fundamental Food Microbiology. 5ª ed. CRC Press.
[12]	European Food Safety Authority and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. 2016. The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food–borne outbreaks in 2015. EFSA J 14: 4634.
[13]	Santos MI, Correia C, Cunha MIC, et al. (2005) Valores guia para avaliação da qualidade microbiológica de alimentos prontos a comer preparados em estabelecimentos de restauração. Ver. Ord. Farm 64:66–68.
[14]	Donnison AM (1992) Enumeration of Enterococci in New Zealand waters and effluents. Environ Technol 13: 771–778. doi: 10.1080/09593339209385208
[15]	Oranusi S, Braide W (2012) A study of microbial safety of ready-to-eat foods vended on highways. Res J Microbiol 3: 66–71.
[16]	Silva SRP, Verdin SEF, Pereira DC, et al. (2007) Microbiological quality of minimally processed vegetables sold in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Braz. J Microbiol 38: 594–598. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822007000400003
[17]	Academic Press (2014) Encyclopedia of Food Safety. 1st ed. Elsevier.
[18]	Santos MI, Cavaco A, Gouveia J, et al. (2012) Evaluation of Minimally Processed Salads Commercialized in Portugal. Food Control 23: 275–281. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.06.022
[19]	Subbiya A, Mahalakshmi K, Pushpangadan S, et al. (2013) Antibacterial efficacy of Mangifera indica L. kernel and Ocimum sanctum L. leaves against Enterococcus faecalis dentinal biofilm. J Conserv Dent 16: 454–457.
[20]	Consumer Reports (2010) Packaged salad can contain high levels of bacteria. Available from: http://www.consumerreports.org/media–room/press–releases/2010/02/packaged–salad–can–contain–high–levels–of–bacteria/.
[21]	Graça A, Esteves E, Nunes C, et al. (2017) Microbiological quality and safety of minimally processed fruits in the marketplace of southern Portugal. Food Control 73: 775–783.
[22]	Santo D, Graça A, Nunes C, et al. (2018) Escherichia coli and Cronobacter sakazakii in "Tommy Atkins" minimally processed mangos: Survival, growth and effect of UV–C and electrolyzed water. Food Microbiology 70: 49–54. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2017.09.008

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)