Impacts on vegetable yields, nutrient contents and soil fertility in a community garden with different compost amendments

Dongyan Mu; John Hawks; Andrew Diaz; Dongyan Mu; John Hawks; Andrew Diaz

doi:10.3934/environsci.2020023

AIMS Environmental Science

2020, Volume 7, Issue 4: 350-365. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020023

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Impacts on vegetable yields, nutrient contents and soil fertility in a community garden with different compost amendments

1.
School of Environmental and Sustainability Science, Kean University. 1000 Morris Ave, Union NJ 07083, USA
2.
Albert Dorman Honors College, New Jersey Institute of Technology. 323 Dr M.L.K. Jr. Blvd, Newark, NJ 07102, USA

Received: 03 June 2020 Accepted: 01 September 2020 Published: 21 September 2020

This study aimed to test impacts on soil fertility, plant yield, and plant nutrient content when growing vegetables (Arugula and Radish) at different compost treatments rates (10%, 30%, 50% and 70% v/v) and with synthetic fertilizer. The compost used in this study was produced from food wastes in combination of wood chips. The results showed the impacts on vegetable growth and soil fertility varied exceptionally by the compost amendment rate. Specifically, the leafy crop experienced an increased yield with the incremented compost ratio and therefore the highest treatment (70%) generated a harvest several times larger to that of non-treated soil. For the root vegetable, the largest output was observed at a medium treatment rate (50%). Additionally, the applications revealed compost treatments at high percentages generally promoted elements N, P, K, Na, Mn, Zn and Mg within the vegetable contents. On the contrary, a low compost amount (10%) boosted Ca, Al, and Fe levels. In terms of soil fertility enrichment, the compost can improve C, N, K and Zn at medium to high treatment rates (30% to 70%). Particularly, at such amounts, the compost enhanced C and N contents within the ground soil more than the fertilizer application. Based on the gathered outcomes, root vegetables will thrive at 50% compost treatment allowing for the replacement of complete synthetic fertilizer use without significant reduction on yields and nutrients. As for leafy green vegetables, the 70 % compost concentration permits the replacement of more than half the total fertilizer usage.
- food waste compost,
- vegetable growing,
- soil fertility,
- vegetable nutrients,
- sustainability
Citation: Dongyan Mu, John Hawks, Andrew Diaz. Impacts on vegetable yields, nutrient contents and soil fertility in a community garden with different compost amendments[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(4): 350-365. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020023

Related Papers:

Abstract

This study aimed to test impacts on soil fertility, plant yield, and plant nutrient content when growing vegetables (Arugula and Radish) at different compost treatments rates (10%, 30%, 50% and 70% v/v) and with synthetic fertilizer. The compost used in this study was produced from food wastes in combination of wood chips. The results showed the impacts on vegetable growth and soil fertility varied exceptionally by the compost amendment rate. Specifically, the leafy crop experienced an increased yield with the incremented compost ratio and therefore the highest treatment (70%) generated a harvest several times larger to that of non-treated soil. For the root vegetable, the largest output was observed at a medium treatment rate (50%). Additionally, the applications revealed compost treatments at high percentages generally promoted elements N, P, K, Na, Mn, Zn and Mg within the vegetable contents. On the contrary, a low compost amount (10%) boosted Ca, Al, and Fe levels. In terms of soil fertility enrichment, the compost can improve C, N, K and Zn at medium to high treatment rates (30% to 70%). Particularly, at such amounts, the compost enhanced C and N contents within the ground soil more than the fertilizer application. Based on the gathered outcomes, root vegetables will thrive at 50% compost treatment allowing for the replacement of complete synthetic fertilizer use without significant reduction on yields and nutrients. As for leafy green vegetables, the 70 % compost concentration permits the replacement of more than half the total fertilizer usage.

References

[1]	UN. 2018. 68% of the World Population Projected to Live in Urban Areas by 2050, Says UN. UN DESA Department of Economic and Social Affairs. United Nations. United Nations. https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html.
[2]	Knorr D, Khoo CSH, Augustin M A (2017) Food for an urban planet: challenges and research opportunities. Front Nutr 4: 73.
[3]	Romeo D, Vea EB, Thomsen M (2018) Environmental impacts of urban hydroponics in Europe: a case study in Lyon. Procedia CIRP 69: 540-545.
[4]	UNEP. 2002. Vital Water Graphics: An Overview of the State of the World's Fresh and Marine Waters. UNEP. https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/report/vital-water-graphics-overview-state-worlds-fresh-and-marine-waters.
[5]	Stephen L (2018) 75% of Earth's land areas are degraded. National Geographic website. Available from: https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018/03/ipbes-land-degradation-environmental-damage-report-spd/
[6]	Miller G, Spoolman S (2014) Chapter 10 Food Production and the environment. Environmental Science, 15th Ed. Cengage Learning: Boston, MA.
[7]	Gunders D, Bloom J (2017) Wasted: how America is losing up to 40 percent of its food from farm to fork to landfill. NRDC, R: I7-05-A.
[8]	USEPA Website a. Overview of Greenhouse Gases. Methane Emissions. USEPA, Washington DC. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases
[9]	Saer A, Lansing S, Davitt NH, et al. (2013) Life cycle assessment of a food waste composting system: environmental impact hotspots. J Clean Prod 52: 234-244.
[10]	USEPA (2009) Backyard Composting It's only natural. USEPA, Washington DC.
[11]	Warman PR (2005) Soil fertility, yield and nutrient contents of vegetable crops after 12 years of compost or fertilizer amendments. Biol Agric Hortic 23: 85-96.
[12]	Iqbal S, Thierfelder C, Khan HZ, et al. (2017) Maximizing maize quality, productivity and profitability through a combined use of compost and nitrogen fertilizer in a semi-arid environment in Pakistan. Nutr Cycl Aagroecosys 107: 197-213
[13]	Hepperly P, Lotter D, Ulsh CZ, et al. (2009) Compost, manure and synthetic fertilizer influences crop yields, soil properties, nitrate leaching and crop nutrient content. Compost Sci Util 17: 117-126.
[14]	Kumar B, Kumar S, Prakash D, et al. (2011) A study on sugar mill pressmud compost for some heavy metal content and their bio-availability. Asian J Plant Sci Res 1: 115-122
[15]	Mikkelsen R, Hartz TK (2008) Nitrogen sources for organic crop production. Better Crop 92: 16-19.
[16]	Zhang Y, Li C, Wang Y, et al. (2016) Maize yield and soil fertility with combined use of compost and inorganic fertilizers on a calcareous soil on the North China Plain. Soil Till Res 155: 85-94.
[17]	Sarangi BK, Mudliar SN, Bhatt P, et al. (2008) Compost from Sugar mill press mud and distillery spent wash for sustainable agriculture. Dyn Soil Dyn Plant 2: 35-49.
[18]	Farhad W, Cheema MA, Saleem MF, et al. (2011) Response of Maize Hybrids to Composted and Non-composted Poultry Manure under Different Irrigation Regimes. Int J Agric Biol 13.
[19]	Brown S, Cotton M (2011)Changes in soil properties and carbon content following compost application: results of on-farm sampling. Compost Sci Util 19: 87-96.
[20]	Stewart-Wade SM (2020)Efficacy of organic amendments used in containerized plant production: Part 1-Compost-based amendments. Sci Hortic 266: 108856.
[21]	Bonanomi G, D'Ascoli R, Scotti R, et al. (2014) Soil quality recovery and crop yield enhancement by combined application of compost and wood to vegetables grown under plastic tunnels. Agr Ecosyst Environ 192: 1-7.
[22]	Evanylo G, Sherony C, Spargo J, et al. (2008) Soil and water environmental effects of fertilizer-, manure-, and compost-based fertility practices in an organic vegetable cropping system. Agr Ecosyst Environ 127: 50-58.
[23]	Mö ller K (2018) Soil fertility status and nutrient input-output flows of specialised organic cropping systems: a review. Nutr Cycl Aagroecosys 112: 147-164.
[24]	Mu D, Horowitz N, Casey M, et al. (2017) Environmental and economic analysis of an in-vessel food waste composting system at Kean University in the US. Waste Manage 59: 476-486.
[25]	Eksi M, Rowe DB, Fernández-Cañ ero R, et al. (2015) Effect of substrate compost percentage on green roof vegetable production. Urban For Urban Gree 14: 315-322.
[26]	Tavarini S, Cardelli R, Saviozzi A, et al. (2011) Effects of green compost on soil biochemical characteristics and nutritive quality of leafy vegetables. Compost Sci Util 19: 114-122.
[27]	Leghari SJ, Wahocho NA, Laghari GM, et al. (2016) Role of nitrogen for plant growth and development: A review. Adv Environ Biol 10: 209-219
[28]	López-Cuadrado MC, Ruiz-Fernández J, Masaguer A, et al. (2005) Utilization of different organic wastes from madrid as growth media for Pelargonium zonale[C]//International Symposium on Growing Media. 779: 623-630.
[29]	Jiang Y, Li Y, Nie G, et al. (2016) Leaf and root growth, carbon and nitrogen contents, and gene expression of perennial ryegrass to different nitrogen supplies. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 141: 555-562.
[30]	Cao Y, Huang H, Wang J, et al. (2020) Crop response and quality of soil as affected by hyperthermophilic compost in Tai-Lake region of China. J Plant Nutr 43: 1000-1015.
[31]	Ceglie FG, Elshafie H, Verrastro V, et al. (2011) Evaluation of olive pomace and green waste composts as peat substitutes for organic tomato seedling production. Compost Sci Util 19: 293-300.
[32]	Mugnai S, Pasquini T, Azzarello E, et al. (2007) Evaluation of composted green waste in ornamental container-grown plants: effects on growth and plant water relations. Compost Sci Util 15: 283-287.
[33]	Barrett GE, Alexander PD, Robinson JS, et al. (2016) Achieving environmentally sustainable growing media for soilless plant cultivation systems-A review. Sci Hortic 212: 220-234.
[34]	Gong X, Li S, Sun X, et al. (2018) Green waste compost and vermicompost as peat substitutes in growing media for geranium (Pelargonium zonale L.) and calendula (Calendula officinalis L.). Sci Hortic 236: 186-191.
[35]	Massa D, Malorgio F, Lazzereschi S, et al. (2018) Evaluation of two green composts for peat substitution in geranium (Pelargonium zonale L.) cultivation: Effect on plant growth, quality, nutrition, and photosynthesis. Sci Hortic 228: 213-221.
[36]	Kranz CN, McLaughlin RA, Johnson A, et al. (2020) The effects of compost incorporation on soil physical properties in urban soils-A concise review. J Environ Man 261: 110209.
[37]	Faucette LB, Jordan CF, Risse LM, et al. (2005) Evaluation of stormwater from compost and conventional erosion control practices in construction activities. J Soil Water Conserv 60: 288-297.
[38]	Logsdon SD, Sauer PA, Shipitalo MJ (2017) Compost improves urban soil and water quality. J Water Res Prot 2017: 345-357.
[39]	Mohammadshirazi F, McLaughlin R A, Heitman J L, et al. (2017) A multi-year study of tillage and amendment effects on compacted soils. J Environ Man 203: 533-541.

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)