Citation: Périne Doyen, Etienne Morhain, François Rodius. Modulation of metallothionein, pi-GST and Se-GPx mRNA expression in the freshwater bivalve Dreissena polymorpha transplanted into polluted areas[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2015, 2(2): 333-344. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2015.2.333
[1] | Rajanish Kumar Rai, Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Yun Kang, Arvind Kumar Misra . Modeling the effect of literacy and social media advertisements on the dynamics of infectious diseases. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(5): 5812-5848. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020311 |
[2] | Dongmei Li, Bing Chai, Weihua Liu, Panpan Wen, Ruixue Zhang . Qualitative analysis of a class of SISM epidemic model influenced by media publicity. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(5): 5727-5751. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020308 |
[3] | Lu-Wen Liao . A branch and bound algorithm for optimal television commercial scheduling. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(5): 4933-4945. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022231 |
[4] | Wenjie Qin, Jiamin Zhang, Zhengjun Dong . Media impact research: a discrete SIR epidemic model with threshold switching and nonlinear infection forces. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(10): 17783-17802. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023790 |
[5] | Xinzhou Xie, Zhongru Wang, Li Tian, Hamoud Dekkiche, Mohamad Salama . Research on online advertising attention evaluation decision based on the stability of delay differential equations and Hopf bifurcation analysis. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(4): 4761-4771. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021242 |
[6] | Cunjuan Dong, Changcheng Xiang, Wenjin Qin, Yi Yang . Global dynamics for a Filippov system with media effects. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(3): 2835-2852. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022130 |
[7] | Xuejuan Lu, Shaokai Wang, Shengqiang Liu, Jia Li . An SEI infection model incorporating media impact. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2017, 14(5&6): 1317-1335. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017068 |
[8] | Rajanish Kumar Rai, Arvind Kumar Misra, Yasuhiro Takeuchi . Modeling the impact of sanitation and awareness on the spread of infectious diseases. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(2): 667-700. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019032 |
[9] | Anji Yang, Baojun Song, Sanling Yuan . Noise-induced transitions in a non-smooth SIS epidemic model with media alert. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(1): 745-763. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021040 |
[10] | Xinyu Liu, Zimeng Lv, Yuting Ding . Mathematical modeling and stability analysis of the time-delayed $ SAIM $ model for COVID-19 vaccination and media coverage. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(6): 6296-6316. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022294 |
Due to inadequate medical facilities in developing countries, they face difficulties to prevent the spread of new and re-emerging infectious diseases. Thus, on the emergence of any new infectious disease, these countries focus on the alternate of medical facilities to slow down its spread. Awareness, which brings the behavioral changes among the population, can be seen as partial treatment at no cost. Apart from this, awareness regarding the spread of any infectious disease also reduces the economic burden required for medication [24,31]. The correct and timely knowledge about the disease has the capacity to halt its spread. To disseminate awareness, several modes, like Television, radio, posters, social media, etc., can be used. Nowadays social media is an important platform to propagate information regarding the risk of infection and its control mechanisms. In India, the number of Smartphone users are predicted to reach
In the recent past, some studies have been conducted to assess the impact of media to control the spread of infectious diseases [11,13,27,28,29,41,37,38,36,43,44]. In particular, Sun et al. [41] have studied an SIS model to see the effect of media-induced social distancing on disease prevalence in two patch. Authors have assumed that the contact rate decreases as the number of infected individuals in respective patch increases. Their finding suggests that the media coverage reduces the disease prevalence and shorten the duration of infection. Misra et al. [29] have proposed an SIS model to see the effects of awareness through media campaigns on the prevalence of infectious diseases by considering media campaigns as a dynamic variable whose growth is proportional to the number of infected individuals. In the modeling process, it is assumed that media campaigns induce behavioral changes among susceptible individuals and they form an isolated aware class, which is fully protected from infection. The model analysis reveals that the number of infectives decreases as the media campaigns increases. Samanta et al. [37] have extended this model by assuming that aware susceptibles are also vulnerable to infection but at a lower rate than unaware susceptibles. In this model, authors have assumed that the growth rate of media campaigns is proportional to the mortality rate due to the disease. It is shown that the rate of execution of awareness programs has enough impact on the endemic state and sustained oscillations may arise through Hopf-bifurcation. Further, Dubey et al. [11] have studied the role of media and treatment on the emergence of an infectious disease. It is shown that media plays an important role to eliminate the disease in presence of treatment. As the information regarding the disease driven by media campaigns modifies the human behavior towards the disease [9,12,35]. Therefore, Funk et al. [14] have studied the impact of public awareness and local behavioral response, where the proportion of both the susceptible and infected individuals is aware and aware susceptibles are less vulnerable to infection whereas awareness among infected individuals reduces the infectivity due to pharmaceutical interventions. Kiss et al. [22] have proposed an SIRS model with treatment compartment by considering two classes of susceptible and infected individuals (responsive and non-responsive towards the information). Authors have assumed that the responsive infected individuals search treatment faster in comparison to non-responsive infected individuals and the rate of disease transmission among responsive susceptibles is less due to the impact of information. It is shown that if the dissemination rate is fast enough, the infection can be eradicated. Here, it may be noted that information provided to the population through media changes the human behavior and population adopt the precautionary measures, like the use of bed nets for Malaria [3,33], condoms for HIV/ AIDS [1,8,20,34], wearing of face masks for influenza [19,23], vaccination [4,5,39], voluntary quarantine [17], etc., to prevent the spread of such diseases. Buonomo et al. [5] have studied the effect of information on vaccination of an infectious disease and it is shown that for low media coverage, the endemic state is globally stable and for higher media coverage, this endemic state becomes unstable and sustained oscillations occur. The effect of media-related information on the spread of any infectious disease is also studied by considering the decrease in the contact rate between susceptibles and infectives as (ⅰ) the exponential decaying function of infectives [6,26], (ⅱ) saturated function of infectives [7,27,42]. In these studies, it is found that media coverage does not affect basic reproduction number of the disease but controls the prevalence of the disease in the population.
For some infectious diseases, mathematical models are also proposed to see the effect of time delay in the implementation of awareness programs [15,30,32] and it is shown that incorporation of time delay in the modeling process destabilizes the system. Recently, Kumar et al. [24] have proposed an SIRS model to see the role of information and limited optimal treatment on disease prevalence. Authors have considered that the growth rate of information is proportional to a saturated function of infected individuals. It is shown that combined effects of information and treatment are more fruitful and economical during the course of infection. Agaba et al. [2] have proposed a SIRS - type model to see the impact of awareness by considering private awareness, which reduces the contact rate between unaware and aware population and public information campaigns on disease prevalence. It is shown that both the private and public awareness have the capacity to reduce the size of epidemic outbreaks.
It may be noted that the change in human behavior towards the diseases through print media, social media, internet are limited only to educated people but TV ads have the capacity to impact large population (less educated people too) in a very short period of time and thus are more effective. In previous studies, it is assumed that the awareness programs are implemented proportional to the number of infected individuals by considering media campaigns as a dynamic variable or transmission rate as decreasing function of infected individuals due to media alerts. However, it is plausible to assume that the cumulative number of TV and social media ads increases proportional to number of infected individuals and their growth rate decreases with the increase in number of aware individuals as cost is also involved in broadcasting the information. In this regard, Kim and Yoo [21] have presented the cost effective analysis for the implementation of TV campaigns to promote vaccination against seasonal influenza in an elderly population and the remarkable increment in vaccination coverage is found due to TV campaigns.
Keeping in mind the importance of information provided through social media and TV ads to the population regarding the protection against any infectious disease and cost involved in TV advertisements, in the present, we formulate and analyze a nonlinear mathematical model to study the effect of TV and social media ads which includes internet information as well as print media for the control of an infectious disease. In the modeling process, it is assumed that the cumulative number of TV and social media ads increases proportional to the number of infected individuals and their growth rate decreases with the increase in number of aware individuals.
Let in the region under consideration,
Taking into account above facts, the dynamics of the problem is governed by the following system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations:
$ \frac{dS}{dt} = \Lambda-\beta S I- \lambda S \frac{M}{p+M}+\nu I+\lambda_0 A-d S , \nonumber \\ \frac{dI}{dt} = \beta S I-(\nu+\alpha+d)I, \\ \frac{dA}{dt} = \lambda S \frac{M}{p+M}-(\lambda_0+d)A, \nonumber \\ \frac{dM}{dt} = r\left(1-\theta \frac{A}{\omega+A}\right)I-r_0(M-M_0), \nonumber $ | (1) |
where,
In the above model system (1),
Using the fact that
$ \frac{dI}{dt} = \beta I\left(N-I-A\right)-(\nu+\alpha+d)I, \nonumber \\ \frac{dA}{dt} = \lambda \frac{M}{p+M}\left(N-I-A\right)-(\lambda_0+d)A, \nonumber\\ \frac{dN}{dt} = \Lambda-d N-\alpha I, \\ \frac{dM}{dt} = r\left(1-\theta\frac{A}{\omega+A}\right)I-r_0(M-M_0).\nonumber $ | (2) |
As the study of model system (1) is equivalent to the study of model system (2), so we study model system (2).
For the solutions of model (2), the region of attraction [29] is given by the set:
$ \Omega = \{(I, A, N, M)\in \mathbb{R}_+^4 : 0\leq I, A \leq\ N \leq \frac{\Lambda}{d}, 0\leq\ M \leq \left(M_0+\frac{r\Lambda}{r_0 d}\right) = M_r \}.\nonumber $ |
and attracts all solutions initiating in the interior of the positive orthant.
Proof. From the third equation of model system (2), we have
$ \frac{dN}{dt} \leq \Lambda-dN $ |
and
$ \frac{d}{dt}\left(N e^{dt}\right)\leq \Lambda e^{dt}. $ |
Now integrating the above equation from
$ N(t)\leq N_0 e^{-dt}+\frac{\Lambda}{d} $ |
Therefore, by using the theory of differential inequalities [25], we obtain,
Further, from the fourth equation of model system (2) and using the fact,
$ \frac{dM}{dt}+r_0 M\leq \left(r_0 M_0+r\frac{\Lambda}{d}\right). $ |
From the theory of differential inequality, we obtain
$ \lim\limits_{t\to\infty}\sup M(t)\leq\left(M_0+\frac{r\Lambda}{r_0 d}\right). $ |
This implies that
In this section, we show the feasibility of all equilibria by setting the rate of change with respect to time '
(ⅰ) The disease-free equilibrium (DFE)
(ⅱ) The endemic equilibrium (EE)
Let us denote
The feasibility of the equilibrium
Feasibility of equilibrium
In equilibrium
$ \beta(N-I-A)-(\nu+\alpha+d) = 0, $ | (3) |
$ \lambda \frac{M}{p+M}(N-I-A)-(\lambda_0+d)A = 0, $ | (4) |
$ \Lambda-dN-\alpha I = 0, $ | (5) |
$ r\left(1-\theta \frac{A}{\omega+A}\right)I-r_0(M-M_0) = 0. $ | (6) |
From equation (5), we obtain
$ N-I = \frac{\Lambda-(\alpha+d)I}{d}. $ | (7) |
From equations (3) and (7), we get
$ A = \frac{\beta(\Lambda-(\alpha+d)I)-d(\nu+\alpha+d)}{\beta d}. $ | (8) |
Here, it may be noted that for
From equation (8), we obtain
$ G(I) = \left(1-\theta\frac{A}{\omega+A}\right) = \frac{\beta d \omega+(1-\theta)[\beta(\Lambda-(\alpha+d)I)-d(\nu+\alpha+d)]}{\beta d \omega+\beta(\Lambda-(\alpha+d)I)-d(\nu+\alpha+d)}. $ | (9) |
Differentiating above equation with respect to
$ G^\prime(I) = \frac{\theta \beta^2 d \omega(\alpha+d)}{[\beta d \omega+\beta(\Lambda-(\alpha+d)I)-d(\nu+\alpha+d)]^2}. $ | (10) |
From the above equation, it is clear that,
Further, from equation (6), we have
$ \frac{M}{p+M} = \frac{r_0 M_0+r I G(I)}{(p+M_0)r_0+r I G(I)}. $ | (11) |
Substituting equations (8) and (11) in equation (4), we obtain an equation in
${ F(I) = \lambda\left(\frac{r_0 M_0+r I G(I)}{(p+M_0)r_0+r I G(I)}\right)\left(\frac{\nu+\alpha+d}{\beta}\right)-(\lambda_0+d)\left(\frac{\beta(\Lambda-(\alpha+d)I)-d(\nu+\alpha+d)}{\beta d}\right)}. $ | (12) |
From, equation (12), we may easily note that
(ⅰ)
(ⅱ)
Thus, clearly
Remark 1. From equation (12), it is easy to see that
Remark 2. From equation (12), it is also easy to note that
For the details of remarks 1 and 2, see Appendix B.
In this section, we summarize the results of linear stability of the model system (2) by finding the sign of eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix around the equilibrium
Theorem 4.1. (i) The equilibrium (DFE)
(ii) The equilibrium (EE)
$ B_3(B_1B_2-B_3)-B_1^2B_4>0. $ | (13) |
For the proof of this theorem, see Appendix C.
The above theorem tells that if
The local stability analysis of the endemic equilibrium tells that if the initial values of any trajectory are near the equilibrium
In this section, we provide the result of the nonlinear stability of the model system (2). The nonlinear stability analysis of the endemic equilibrium follows from the following theorem:
Theorem 5.1. The endemic equilibrium
$ \left(G_{11}\right)^2 < \frac{16}{45}\min\left\{\frac{1}{5}\left(\frac{d}{\theta \Lambda}\right)^2, G_{12}\right\} $ | (14) |
$ \left(\frac{\lambda M^*}{\lambda M^*+(p+M^*)(\lambda_0+d)}\right)^2 < \frac{16}{75}\min\left\{\frac{1}{3}, \frac{d}{\alpha}\right\} $ | (15) |
where,
For the proof of this theorem, see Appendix D.
Remark 3. From the nonlinear stability conditions (14) and (15) of the endemic equilibrium, it is clear that the growth rate of TV and social media ads and dissemination rate of awareness among susceptible individuals (i.e.,
In this section, we derive the conditions for the existence of Hopf-bifurcation around the endemic equilibrium
$ \eta^4 + B_1(r)\eta^3 + B_2(r)\eta^2 + B_3(r) \eta+B_4(r) = 0. $ | (16) |
It is clear that
$ B_3(r_c)(B_1(r_c)B_2(r_c)-B_3(r_c))-B_1^2(r_c)B_4(r_c) = 0. $ | (17) |
Then at
$ \left(\eta^2+\frac{B_3}{B_1}\right)\left(\eta^2+B_1\eta+\frac{B_1B_4}{B_3}\right) = 0. $ | (18) |
This equation has four roots, say
$ \eta_3+\eta_4 = -B_1 $ | (19) |
$ \omega_0^2+\eta_3\eta_4 = B_2 $ | (20) |
$ \omega_0^2(\eta_3+\eta_4) = -B_3 $ | (21) |
$ \omega_0^2\eta_3\eta_4 = B_4. $ | (22) |
If,
$ \kappa^4+B_1\kappa^3+B_2\kappa^2+B_3\kappa+B_4+\vartheta^4-6\kappa^2\vartheta^2-3B_1\kappa\vartheta^2-B_2\vartheta^2 = 0, $ | (23) |
$ 4\kappa\vartheta(\kappa^2-\vartheta^2)-B_1\vartheta^3+3B_1\kappa^2\vartheta+2B_2\kappa\vartheta+B_3\vartheta = 0. $ | (24) |
As
$-(4\kappa+B_1)\vartheta^2+4\kappa^3+3B_1\kappa^2+2B_2\kappa+B_3 = 0.$ |
Using the value of
$ -64\kappa^6-96B_1\kappa^5-16\left(3B_1^2+2B_2\right)\kappa^4-8\left(B_1^3+4B_1B_2\right)\kappa^3\nonumber\\ -4\left(B_2^2+2B_1^2B_2+B_1B_3-4B_4\right)\kappa^2-2B_1(B_1B_3+B_2^2-4B_4)\kappa\nonumber\\ -(B_3(B_1B_2-B_3)-B_1^2B_4) = 0. $ |
Differentiating above equation with respect to
$ \left[\frac{d\kappa}{dr}\right]_{r = r_c} = \left[\frac{\frac{d}{dr}(B_3(B_1B_2-B_3)-B_1^2B_4)}{-2B_1\left(B_1B_3+B_2^2-4B_4\right)}\right]_{r = r_c}. $ |
Using the value of
$ \left[\frac{d\kappa}{dr}\right]_{r = r_c} = \left[\frac{\frac{d}{dr}(B_3(B_1B_2-B_3)-B_1^2B_4)}{-2B_1\left(B_1B_3+\left(\frac{2B_3}{B_1}\right)^2-2\left(\frac{2B_3}{B_1}\right)B_2+B_2^2\right)}\right]_{r = r_c}. $ |
This implies that
$ \left[\frac{d\kappa}{dr}\right]_{r = r_c} = \left[\frac{\frac{d}{dr}(B_1B_2B_3-B_3^2-B_1^2B_4)}{-2B_1(B_1B_3+(2B_3/B_1-B_2)^2)}\right]_{r = r_{c}}\neq0 $ |
if
Theorem 6.1. The reduced model system (2) undergoes Hopf-bifurcation around the endemic equilibrium
(i)
(ii)
i.e.,
In this section, we present the result for the direction of bifurcating periodic solutions. The following theorem provides the information about the direction and stability of the periodic solutions.
Theorem 7.1. The Hopf-bifurcation is forward (backward) if
For the proof of this theorem see, Appendix E.
In the previous sections, we have presented the qualitative analysis of the model system (2) and obtained results regarding the stability of equilibria and Hopf-bifurcation analysis of the endemic equilibrium. In this section, we conduct numerical simulation of model system (2) using MATLAB, regarding the feasibility of our analysis and its stability conditions.
For the set of parameter values, we have checked that the condition for the feasibility of the endemic equilibrium (i.e.,
$ {I^ * } = {\rm{ }}932, \;\;{A^ * } = {\rm{ }}57151, \;\;{N^ * } = {\rm{ }}124767, \;\;{M^ * } = {\rm{ }}1618. $ |
For the set of parameter values given in Table 1, the value of basic reproduction number
Parameter | Values | Parameter | Values |
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
For the chosen set of parameter values given in Table 1, the dynamics near the endemic equilibrium changes as the growth rate of TV and social media ads (
In this paper, we have proposed and analyzed a nonlinear mathematical model to assess the impact of TV and social media ads on the spread of an infectious disease. In the model formulation, it is assumed that cumulative number of TV and social media ads increases proportional to the number of infected individuals and their growth rate decreases with the increase in number of aware individuals. It is also assumed that susceptible individuals contract infection due to the direct contact with infected individuals.
The analysis of proposed model reveals that only two equilibria; namely disease-free equilibrium (DFE)
The above discussion in terms of epidemiology states that the augmentation in the dissemination rate of awareness among susceptible individuals increases the number of aware individuals, which leads to decrease in the number of TV and social media ads and thus increases the number of infected individuals. Further, this increase in number of infected individuals increases the TV and social media ads, which increases the aware individuals. This interplay between the number of infected individuals and dissemination of awareness through TV and social media gives rise to oscillatory solution. It may be noted that when number of infected individuals become low and aware population reaches its saturated level, the oscillatory behavior dies out and further increase in dissemination rate provides the stable solution. Further increase in dissemination rate of awareness among the susceptible individuals after a threshold (i.e.,
Authors are grateful to reviewers for their useful suggestions. The second author thankfully acknowledge the University Grants Commission, New Delhi, India for providing financial assistance during the research period.
Here, we will find the basic reproduction number
$ \frac{dx}{dt} = \mathcal{F}(x)-\mathcal{V}(x), $ |
where
The Jacobian matrix of
and
$
J\mathcal{V}(E_0) = \left(
(ν+α+d)000λM0p+M0(λM0p+M0+λ0+d)−λM0p+M0−λp(p+M0)2(Λd−A0)α0d0−r(1−θA0ω+A0)00r0
\right),
$
|
where
$\mathcal{K}_{L} = \left(
βΛd(ν+α+d)((λ0+d)(p+M0)λM0+(λ0+d)(p+M0))000000000000000
\right).$
|
Therefore, basic reproduction number is
$R_1 = \frac{\beta\Lambda}{d(\nu+\alpha+d)}\left(\frac{(\lambda_0+d)(p+M_0)}{\lambda M_0+(\lambda_0+d)(p+M_0)}\right).$ |
Here, we proof the results for
(ⅰ) Variation of
Here we show the variation of
$ \beta(N^*-I^*-A^*)-(\nu+\alpha+d) = 0, \label{eq38b} $ | (25) |
$ \lambda \frac{M^*}{p+M^*}(N^*-I^*-A^*)-(\lambda_0+d)A^* = 0, \label{eq39b} $ | (26) |
$ \Lambda -dN^*-\alpha I^* = 0, \label{eq40b} $ | (27) |
$ r\left(1-\theta \frac{A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)I^*-r_0(M^*-M_0) = 0.\label{eq41b} $ | (28) |
Using equation (27) in equation (25), we have
$ {\rm{Let}}\ \ \mathbb{F}_1(r, I^*, A^*): = \beta\left(\frac{\Lambda-(\alpha+d)I^*}{d}-A^*\right)-(\nu+\alpha+d) = 0. $ | (29) |
And using equations (27) and (28) in equation (26), we have
$ \mathbb{G}_1(r, I^*, A^*) : = \lambda\left(\frac{r\left(1-\theta\frac{A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)I^*+r_0M_0}{r\left(1-\theta\frac{A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)I^*+r_0(p+M_0)}\right)\left(\frac{\Lambda-(\alpha+d)I^*}{d}-A^*\right)\nonumber\\ -(\lambda_0+d)A^* = 0. $ | (30) |
Differentiating
$ \frac{\partial \mathbb{G}_1}{\partial r} = \frac{\lambda p r_0\left(1-\theta\frac{A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)I^*}{\left(r\left(1-\theta\frac{A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)I^*+r_0(p+M_0)\right)^2}\left(\frac{\Lambda-(\alpha+d)I^*}{d}-A^*\right), \label{eq44b} \\ $ | (31) |
$ \frac{\partial \mathbb{G}_1}{\partial I^*} = -\frac{\lambda(\alpha+d)}{d}\left(\frac{r\left(1-\theta\frac{A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)I^*+r_0M_0}{r\left(1-\theta\frac{A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)I^*+r_0(p+M_0)}\right)\nonumber\\ +\frac{\lambda pr_0r\left(1-\theta\frac{A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)}{\left(r\left(1-\theta\frac{A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)I^*+r_0(p+M_0)\right)^2}\left(\frac{\Lambda-(\alpha+d)I^*}{d}-A^*\right), \label{eq45b} $ | (32) |
$ \frac{\partial \mathbb{G}_1}{\partial A^*} = -\lambda\left(\frac{r\left(1-\theta\frac{A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)I^*+r_0M_0}{r\left(1-\theta\frac{A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)I^*+r_0(p+M_0)}\right)\nonumber\\ -\left(\frac{\lambda pr_0r\theta\omega I^*}{(\omega+A^*)^2\left(r\left(1-\theta\frac{A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)I^*+r_0(p+M_0)\right)^2}\right)\nonumber\\ \times\left(\frac{\Lambda-(\alpha+d)I^*}{d}-A^*\right)-(\lambda_0+d)\label{eq46b}. $ | (33) |
Since
$ \frac{\partial \mathbb{F}_1}{\partial r}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{F}_1}{\partial I^*}\frac{dI^*}{dr}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{F}_1}{\partial A^*}\frac{dA^*}{dr} = 0. $ |
Using the values of
$ \frac{dA^*}{dr} = -\left(\frac{\alpha+d}{d}\right)\frac{dI^*}{dr}. $ | (34) |
Since
$ \frac{\partial \mathbb{G}_1}{\partial r}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{G}_1}{\partial I^*}\frac{dI^*}{dr}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{G}_1}{\partial A^*}\frac{dA^*}{dr} = 0. $ |
Using equations (31)-(33) and (34), we get
$ \frac{dI^*}{dr} = -\left(\frac{A_{11}}{A_{12}}\right). $ |
where,
Thus, from above equation it is clear that
(ⅱ) Variation of
$ {\rm{Let}} \ \ \mathbb{F}_2(\lambda, I^*, A^*): = \beta\left(\frac{\Lambda-(\alpha+d)I^*}{d}-A^*\right)-(\nu+\alpha+d) = 0, $ | (35) |
and
$ \mathbb{G}_2(\lambda, I^*, A^*) : = \lambda\left(\frac{r\left(1-\theta\frac{A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)I^*+r_0M_0}{r\left(1-\theta\frac{A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)I^*+r_0(p+M_0)}\right)\left(\frac{\Lambda-(\alpha+d)I^*}{d}-A^*\right)\nonumber\\ -(\lambda_0+d)A^* = 0. $ | (36) |
Differentiating
$ \frac{\partial \mathbb{F}_2}{\partial \lambda}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{F}_2}{\partial I^*}\frac{dI^*}{d\lambda}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{F}_2}{\partial A^*}\frac{dA^*}{d\lambda} = 0. $ |
Using the values of
$ \frac{dA^*}{d\lambda} = -\left(\frac{\alpha+d}{d}\right)\frac{dI^*}{d\lambda}. $ | (37) |
Since
$ \frac{\partial \mathbb{G}_2}{\partial \lambda}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{G}_2}{\partial I^*}\frac{dI^*}{d\lambda}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{G}_2}{\partial A^*}\frac{dA^*}{d\lambda} = 0. $ |
Using the values of
$ \frac{dI^*}{d\lambda} = -\left(\frac{A_{21}}{A_{22}}\right), $ |
where,
Thus, from above equation it is easy to note that
(ⅲ) Variation of
Here we show the variation of
$ {\rm{Let}} \ \ \mathbb{F}_3(M_0, I^*, A^*): = \beta\left(\frac{\Lambda-(\alpha+d)I^*}{d}-A^*\right)-(\nu+\alpha+d) = 0, $ | (38) |
and
$ \mathbb{G}_3(M_0, I^*, A^*)\nonumber\\ : = \lambda\left(\frac{r\left(1-\theta\frac{A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)I^*+r_0M_0}{r\left(1-\theta\frac{A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)I^*+r_0(p+M_0)}\right)\left(\frac{\Lambda-(\alpha+d)I^*}{d}-A^*\right)\nonumber\\ -(\lambda_0+d)A^* = 0. $ | (39) |
Differentiating
$ \frac{\partial \mathbb{F}_3}{\partial M_0}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{F}_3}{\partial I^*}\frac{dI^*}{dM_0}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{F}_3}{\partial A^*}\frac{dA^*}{dM_0} = 0. $ |
Using the values of
$ \frac{dA^*}{dM_0} = -\left(\frac{\alpha+d}{d}\right)\frac{dI^*}{dM_0}. $ | (40) |
Since
$ \frac{\partial \mathbb{G}_3}{\partial M_0}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{G}_3}{\partial I^*}\frac{dI^*}{dM_0}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{G}_3}{\partial A^*}\frac{dA^*}{dM_0} = 0. $ |
Using the values of
$ \frac{dI^*}{dM_0} = -\left(\frac{A_{31}}{A_{32}}\right), $ |
where,
Thus, it is clear that
(ⅳ) Variation of
$ {\rm{Let}} \ \ \mathbb{F}_4(p, I^*, A^*): = \beta\left(\frac{\Lambda-(\alpha+d)I^*}{d}-A^*\right)-(\nu+\alpha+d) = 0, $ | (41) |
and
$ \mathbb{G}_4(p, I^*, A^*) : = \lambda\left(\frac{r\left(1-\theta\frac{A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)I^*+r_0M_0}{r\left(1-\theta\frac{A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)I^*+r_0(p+M_0)}\right)\left(\frac{\Lambda-(\alpha+d)I^*}{d}-A^*\right)\nonumber\\ -(\lambda_0+d)A^* = 0. $ | (42) |
Differentiating
Since
$ \frac{\partial \mathbb{F}_4}{\partial p}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{F}_4}{\partial I^*}\frac{dI^*}{dp}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{F}_4}{\partial A^*}\frac{dA^*}{dp} = 0. $ |
Using the values of
$ \frac{dA^*}{dp} = -\left(\frac{\alpha+d}{d}\right)\frac{dI^*}{dp}. $ | (43) |
Since
$ \frac{\partial \mathbb{G}_4}{\partial p}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{G}_4}{\partial I^*}\frac{dI^*}{dp}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{G}_4}{\partial A^*}\frac{dA^*}{dp} = 0. $ |
Using the values of
$ \frac{dI^*}{dp} = \left(\frac{A_{41}}{A_{42}}\right), $ |
where,
(ⅴ) Variation of
Here, we show the variation of
$ {\rm{Let}} \ \ \mathbb{F}_5(\theta, I^*, A^*): = \beta\left(\frac{\Lambda-(\alpha+d)I^*}{d}-A^*\right)-(\nu+\alpha+d) = 0, $ | (44) |
and
$ \mathbb{G}_5(\theta, I^*, A^*) : = \lambda\left(\frac{r\left(1-\theta\frac{A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)I^*+r_0M_0}{r\left(1-\theta\frac{A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)I^*+r_0(p+M_0)}\right)\left(\frac{\Lambda-(\alpha+d)I^*}{d}-A^*\right)\nonumber\\ -(\lambda_0+d)A^* = 0. $ | (45) |
Differentiating
$ \frac{\partial \mathbb{F}_5}{\partial \theta}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{F}_5}{\partial I^*}\frac{dI^*}{d\theta}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{F}_5}{\partial A^*}\frac{dA^*}{d\theta} = 0. $ |
Using the values of
$ \frac{dA^*}{d\theta} = -\left(\frac{\alpha+d}{d}\right)\frac{dI^*}{d\theta}. $ | (46) |
Since
$ \frac{\partial \mathbb{G}_5}{\partial \theta}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{G}_5}{\partial I^*}\frac{dI^*}{d\theta}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{G}_5}{\partial A^*}\frac{dA^*}{d\theta} = 0. $ |
Using the values of
$ \frac{dI^*}{d\theta} = \left(\frac{A_{51}}{A_{52}}\right), $ |
where,
(ⅵ) Variation of
$ {\rm{Let}} \ \ \mathbb{F}_6(\omega, I^*, A^*): = \beta\left(\frac{\Lambda-(\alpha+d)I^*}{d}-A^*\right)-(\nu+\alpha+d) = 0, $ | (47) |
and
$ \mathbb{G}_6(\omega, I^*, A^*) : = \lambda\left(\frac{r\left(1-\theta\frac{A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)I^*+r_0M_0}{r\left(1-\theta\frac{A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)I^*+r_0(p+M_0)}\right)\left(\frac{\Lambda-(\alpha+d)I^*}{d}-A^*\right)\nonumber\\ -(\lambda_0+d)A^* = 0. $ | (48) |
Differentiating
$ \frac{\partial \mathbb{F}_6}{\partial \omega}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{F}_6}{\partial I^*}\frac{dI^*}{d\omega}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{F}_6}{\partial A^*}\frac{dA^*}{d\omega} = 0. $ |
Using the values of
$ \frac{dA^*}{d\omega} = -\left(\frac{\alpha+d}{d}\right)\frac{dI^*}{d\omega}. $ | (49) |
Since
$ \frac{\partial \mathbb{G}_6}{\partial \omega}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{G}_6}{\partial I^*}\frac{dI^*}{d\omega}+\frac{\partial\mathbb{G}_6}{\partial A^*}\frac{dA^*}{d\omega} = 0. $ |
Using the values of
$ \frac{dI^*}{d\omega} = -\left(\frac{A_{61}}{A_{62}}\right), $ |
where,
Proof. Here, we show the local stability of equilibrium
$J = \left(
a11−βIβI0−λMp+M−λMp+M−(λ0+d)λMp+Mλp(N−I−A)(p+M)2−α0−d0r(1−θAω+A)−rθωI(ω+A)20−r0
\right).$
|
where,
$a_{11} = \beta(N-2I-A)-(\nu+\alpha+d).$ |
Let
$J_0 = \left(
a011−(ν+α+d)000−λM0p+M0−λM0p+M0−(λ0+d)λM0p+M0a024−α0−d0r(1−θA0ω+A0)00−r0
\right).$
|
where,
From the Jacobian matrix evaluated at
Now, we show the local stability of the endemic equilibrium
$ \eta^4 + B_1\eta^3 + B_2\eta^2 + B_3 \eta+B_4 = 0. $ | (50) |
where,
$B_3(B_1B_2-B_3)-B_1^2B_4>0.$ |
Hence, the endemic equilibrium
Proof. To establish the non-linear stability of equilibrium
$
G=I−I∗−I∗ln(II∗)+12m1(A−A∗)2+12m2(N−N∗)2+12m3(M−M∗)2.
$
|
(51) |
where, the coefficient
Differentiating equation (51) with respect to time '
$ \frac{dG}{dt} = -\beta(I-I^*)^2-m_1\left(\frac{\lambda M^*}{p+M^*}+(\lambda_0+d)\right)(A-A^*)^2-\frac{\beta d}{\alpha}(N-N^*)^2\nonumber \\ -m_3r_0(M-M^*)^2-\beta(A-A^*)(I-I^*)-m_1\frac{\lambda M^*}{p+M^*}(I-I^*)(A-A^*) \nonumber\\ +m_1\frac{\lambda p(N-I-A)}{(p+M)(p+M^*)}(M-M^*)(A-A^*)\nonumber \\ -m_3\frac{r\theta \omega I}{(\omega+A)(\omega+A^*)}(M-M^*)(A-A^*)\nonumber \\ +m_1\frac{\lambda M^*}{p+M^*}(N-N^*)(A-A^*) \nonumber \\ +m_3r\left(1-\theta\frac{ A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)(I-I^*)(M-M^*). $ |
Thus,
$ \beta < \frac{4}{15}m_1\left(\frac{\lambda M^*}{p+M^*}+\lambda_0+d\right), \label{eq22b} $ | (52) |
$ m_1\left(\frac{\lambda M^*}{p+M^*}\right)^2 < \frac{4\beta}{15}\left(\frac{\lambda M^*}{p+M^*}+\lambda_0+d\right), \label{eq23b} $ | (53) |
$ m_1\left(\frac{\lambda M^*}{p+M^*}\right)^2 < \frac{4\beta d}{5\alpha}\left(\frac{\lambda M^*}{p+M^*}+\lambda_0+d\right), \label{eq24b} $ | (54) |
$ m_1\left(\frac{\lambda \Lambda}{d(p+M^*)}\right)^2 < \frac{4r_0}{15}m_3\left(\frac{\lambda M^*}{p+M^*}+\lambda_0+d\right), \label{eq25b} $ | (55) |
$ m_3\left(\frac{r\theta \Lambda}{d(\omega+A^*)}\right)^2 < \frac{4r_0}{15}m_1\left(\frac{\lambda M^*}{p+M^*}+\lambda_0+d\right), \label{eq26b} $ | (56) |
$ m_3r^2\left(1-\frac{\theta A^*}{\omega+A^*}\right)^2 < \frac{4\beta r_0}{9}.\label{eq27b} $ | (57) |
From inequalities (52)-(54), we may choose the positive value of
Thus,
Proof. In this section, we proof the result for direction of bifurcating periodic solutions. For this, we translate the origin of the co-ordinate system to the Hopf-bifurcation point
Where,
$\left(
dz1dtdz2dtdz3dtdz4dt
\right) = \left(
f1(z1,z2,z3,z4)f2(z1,z2,z3,z4)f3(z1,z2,z3,z4)f4(z1,z2,z3,z4)
\right)+O(|z|^3).$
|
where,
In the above expression, we are not interested in the coefficient of the third, forth and higher order terms as they make no contribution in the further calculation.
Now, system takes the form:
$ \dot{z} = Pz+H(z). $ | (58) |
where,
$H(z) = \left(
h1h2h3h4
\right)$
|
$ = \left(
−βz21−βz1z2+βz1z3−λp(N∗−I∗−A∗)(p+M∗)3z24−λp(p+M∗)2z1z4−λp(p+M∗)2z2z4+λp(p+M∗)2z3z40rθωI∗(ω+A∗)3z22−rθω(ω+A∗)2z1z2
\right)
.$
|
The eigenvectors
where,
Define,
$V = \left(
v11v12v13v14v21v22v23v24v31v32v33v34v41v42v43v44
\right).$
|
The matrix
$V^{-1}PV = \left(
0−ω000ω000000η30000η4
\right).
$
|
Inverse of matrix
$V^{-1} = \left(
w11w12w13w14w21w22w23w24w31w32w33w34w41w42w43w44
\right).
$
|
where,
Where,
$y = (y_1, y_2, y_3, y_4)^T.$ |
Under this linear transformation system (58), takes the form:
$ \dot{y} = (V^{-1}P V)y+f(y). $ | (59) |
where,
$ \dot{y_1} = -\omega_0 y_2+f^1(y_1, y_2, y_3, y_4), \\ \dot{y_2} = \omega_0 y_1+f^2(y_1, y_2, y_3, y_4), \\ \dot{y_3} = \eta_3 y_3+f^3(y_1, y_2, y_3, y_4), \\ \dot{y_4} = \eta_4 y_4+f^4(y_1, y_2, y_3, y_4). $ |
where,
$f = (f^1, f^2, f^3, f^4)^T.$ |
$f1=w11h1+w12h2+w13h3+w14h4,f2=w21h1+w22h2+w23h3+w24h4,f3=w31h1+w32h2+w33h3+w34h4,f4=w41h1+w42h2+w43h3+w44h4,h1=−β(v11y1+v12y2+v13y3+v14y4)2−β(v11y1+v12y2+v13y3+v14y4)(v21y1+v22y2+v23y3+v24y4)+β(v11y1+v12y2+v13y3+v14y4)(v31y1+v32y2+v33y3+v34y4),h2=−λp(N∗−I∗−A∗)(p+M∗)3(v41y1+v42y2+v43y3+v44y4)2−λp(p+M∗)2(v11y1+v12y2+v13y3+v14y4)(v41y1+v42y2+v43y3+v44y4)−λp(p+M∗)2(v21y1+v22y2+v23y3+v24y4)(v41y1+v42y2+v43y3+v44y4)+λp(p+M∗)2(v31y1+v32y2+v33y3+v34y4)(v41y1+v42y2+v43y3+v44y4),h3=0,h4=−rθω(ω+A∗)2(v11y1+v12y2+v13y3+v14y4)(v21y1+v22y2+v23y3+v24y4)+rθωI∗(ω+A∗)3(v21y1+v22y2+v23y3+v24y4)2. $
|
Furthermore, we can calculate
Using above, we can find following quantities:
$ h_{21} = H_{21}+2\left(H_{110}^1\sigma_{11}^1+H_{110}^2\sigma_{11}^2\right)+H_{101}^1\sigma_{20}^1+H_{101}^2\sigma_{20}^2, \\ c_1(0) = \frac{i}{2\omega_0}\left(h_{11}h_{20}-2 |h_{11}|^2-\frac{|h_{02}|^2} {3}\right)+\frac{h_{21}}{2}, \\ \mu_2 = -\frac{Re (c_1(0))}{\phi^\prime(0)}, \\ \tau_2 = -\frac{Im (c_1(0))+\mu_2 \sigma^\prime(0)}{\omega_0}, \\ \beta_2 = -2\mu_2 \phi^\prime(0). $ |
where,
[1] |
Roméo M, Hoarau P, Garello G, et al. (2003) Mussel transplantation and biomarkers as useful tools for assessing water quality in the NW Mediterranean. Environ Pollut 122: 369-378. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(02)00303-2
![]() |
[2] |
Guerlet E, Ledy K, Meyer A, et al. (2007) Towards a validation of a cellular biomarker suite in native and transplanted zebra mussels: A 2-year integrative field study of seasonal and pollution-induced variations. Aquat Toxicol 81: 377-388. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2006.12.016
![]() |
[3] |
Viarengo A, Lowe D, Bolognesi C, et al. (2007) The use of biomarkers in biomonitoring: A 2-tier approach assessing the level of pollutant-induced stress syndrome in sentinel organisms. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 146: 281-300. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2007.04.011
![]() |
[4] | Borcherding J (2010) Steps from ecological and ecotoxicological research to the monitoring for water quality using the zebra mussel in a biological warning system, In: Van der Velde G, Rajagopal S and bij de Vaate, A The Zebra Mussel in Europe, Leiden/Margraf, Weikersheim: Backhuys, 279-283. |
[5] | Voets J, Bervoets L, Smolders R, et al. (2010) Biomonitoring environmental pollution in freshwater ecosystems using Dreissena polymorpha, In: Van der Velde G, Rajagopal S and bij de Vaate, A The Zebra Mussel in Europe, Leiden/Margraf, Weikersheim: Backhuys, 301-321. |
[6] |
Chatel A, Faucet-Marquis V, Gourlay-Francé C, et al. (2015) Genotoxicity and activation of cellular defenses in transplanted zebra mussels Dreissena polymorpha along the Seine River. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 114: 241-249. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.03.023
![]() |
[7] |
Almar M, Otero L, Santos C, et al. (1998) Liver glutathione content and glutathione-dependent enzymes of two species of freshwater fish as bioindicators of chemical pollution. J Environ Sci Health 33: 769-783. doi: 10.1080/03601239809373177
![]() |
[8] |
Viarengo A, Nott JA (1993) Mechanisms of heavy metal cation homeostasis in marine invertebrates. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 104: 355-372. doi: 10.1016/0742-8413(93)90001-2
![]() |
[9] | Roesijadi D (1996) Metallothionein and its role in toxic metal regulation. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 113: 117-123. |
[10] |
Lemoine S, Laulier M (2003) Potential use of the levels of the mRNA of a specific metallothionein isoform (MT-20) in mussel (Mytilus edulis) as a biomarker of cadmium contamination. Mar Pollut Bull 46: 1450-1455. doi: 10.1016/S0025-326X(03)00283-2
![]() |
[11] |
Mourgaud Y, Martinez E, Geffard A, et al. (2002) Metallothionein concentration in the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis as a biomarker of response to metal contamination: validation in the field. Biomarkers 7: 479-490. doi: 10.1080/1354750021000034528
![]() |
[12] |
Rodius F, Hammer C, Vasseur P (2002). Use of RNA arbitrarily primed PCR to identify genomic alterations in the digestive gland of the freshwater bivalve Unio tumidus at a contaminated site. Environ Toxicol 17: 538-546. doi: 10.1002/tox.10090
![]() |
[13] |
Engelken J, Hildebrandt A (1999) cDNA cloning and cadmium-induced expression of metallothionein mRNA in the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha. Biochem Cell Biol 77: 237-241. doi: 10.1139/bcb-77-3-237
![]() |
[14] |
Doyen P, Bigot A, Vasseur P, et al. (2008) Molecular cloning and expression study of pi-class glutathione S-transferase (pi-GST) and selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidase (Se-GPx) transcripts in the freshwater bivalve Dreissena polymorpha. Comp Biochemi Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 147: 69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2007.08.002
![]() |
[15] |
Snell TW, Brogdon SE, Morgan MB (2003) Gene expression profiling in ecotoxicology. Ecotoxicology 12: 475-483. doi: 10.1023/B:ECTX.0000003033.09923.a8
![]() |
[16] |
Sarkar A, Ray D, Shrivastava AN, et al. (2006) Molecular Biomarkers: their significance and application in marine pollution monitoring. Ecotoxicology 15: 333-340. doi: 10.1007/s10646-006-0069-1
![]() |
[17] |
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-∆∆Ct method. Methods 25: 402-8. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262
![]() |
[18] | R, Developement Core Team (2006) R: A 701 language and environment for statistical 702 computing. R foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0 |
[19] | Mazauer P, Matte JL (2001) Qualité du milieu physique de la Fensch – synthèse. Direction Régionale de l'Environnement de Lorraine, France. |
[20] | Agences de l'Eau (2003) Seuils de qualité pour les micropolluants organiques et minéraux dans les eaux superficielles-synthèse, In: Agences de l'Eau, Système d'Evaluation de la Qualité de l'Eau, Paris, France. |
[21] |
Bigot A, Minguez L, Giamberini L, et al. (2011) Early defense responses in the freshwater bivalve Corbicula fluminea exposed to copper and cadmium: transcriptional and histochemical studies. Environ Toxicol 26: 623-632. doi: 10.1002/tox.20599
![]() |
[22] |
Cossu C, Doyotte A, Jacquin MC, et al. (1997) Glutathione reductase, selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidase, glutathione levels, and lipid peroxidation in freshwater bivalves, Unio tumidus, as biomarkers of aquatic contamination in field studies. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 38: 122-131. doi: 10.1006/eesa.1997.1582
![]() |
[23] |
Suteau P, Daubeze M, Migaud ML, et al. (1988) PAH metabolising enzymes in whole mussel as biochemical tests for chemical pollution monitoring. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 46: 45-49. doi: 10.3354/meps046045
![]() |
[24] |
Livingstone DR, Martinez PG, Michel X, et al. (1990) Oxyradical production as a pollution-mediated mechanism of toxicity in the common mussel, Mytilus edulis L., and other molluscs. Funct Ecol 4: 415-424. doi: 10.2307/2389604
![]() |
[25] |
Livingstone DR (1998) The fate of organic xenobiotics in aquatic ecosystems: quantitative and qualitative differences in biotransformation by invertebrates and fish. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 120: 43-49. doi: 10.1016/S1095-6433(98)10008-9
![]() |
[26] |
Sole M, Porte C, Albaiges J (1994) Mixed-function oxygenase system components and antioxidant enzymes in different marine bivalves: its relation with contaminants body burdens. Aquat Toxicol 30: 271-283. doi: 10.1016/0166-445X(94)90064-7
![]() |
[27] |
Chatel A, Faucet-Marquis V, Perret M, et al. (2012) Genotoxicity assessement and detoxification induction in Dreissena polymorpha exposed to benzo[a]pyrene. Mutagenesis 27: 703-711. doi: 10.1093/mutage/ges036
![]() |
[28] |
Chatel A, Faucet-Marquis V, Pfohl-Leszkowicz A, et al. (2014) DNA adduct formation and induction of detoxification mechanisms in Dreissena polymorpha exposed to nitro-PAHs. Mutagenesis 29: 457-465. doi: 10.1093/mutage/geu040
![]() |
[29] |
Bebianno MJ, Langston WJ (1992) Cadmium induction of metallothionein synthesis in Mytilus galloprovincialis. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 103: 79-85. doi: 10.1016/0742-8413(92)90231-U
![]() |
[30] |
Imagawa M, Osada S, Koyama Y, et al. (1991) SF-B that binds to a negative element in glutathions transferase P gene is similar or identical to trans-activator LAP/IL6-DBP. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 179: 293-300. doi: 10.1016/0006-291X(91)91368-M
![]() |
[31] |
Robillard S, Beauchamp G, Laulier M (2003) The role of abiotic factors and pesticide levels on enzymatic activity in the freshwater mussel Anodonta cygnea at three different exposure sites. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 135: 49-59. doi: 10.1016/S1532-0456(03)00049-8
![]() |
[32] |
Kamel N, Jebali J, Banni M, et al. (2012) Biochemical responses and metals levels in Ruditapes decussatus after exposure to treated municipal effluents. Ecotox Env Saf 82: 40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.05.008
![]() |
[33] |
Radwan MA, El-Gendy KS, Gad AF (2010) Oxidative stress biomarkers in the digestive gland of Theba pisana exposed to heavy metals. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 58: 828-835. doi: 10.1007/s00244-009-9380-1
![]() |
[34] |
Brown RJ, Galloway TS, Lowe D, et al. (2004) Differential sensitivity of three marine invertebrates to copper assessed using multiple biomarkers. Aquat Toxicol 66: 267-278. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2003.10.001
![]() |
[35] | Ciacci C, Barmo C, Gallo G, et al. (2012) Effects of sublethal, environmentally relevant concentrations of hexavalent chromium in the gills of Mytilus galloprovincialis. Aquat Toxicol 120: 109-118. |
[36] |
David E, Tanguy A, Riso R, et al. (2012) Responses of Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas populations to abiotic stress in environmentally contrasted estuaries along the Atlantic coast of France. Aquat Toxicol 109: 70-79. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2011.11.014
![]() |
[37] |
Geret F, Serafim A, Bebianno J (2003) Antioxidant enzyme activities metallothioneins and lipid peroxidation as biomarkers in Ruditapes decussatus? Ecotoxicology 12: 417-426. doi: 10.1023/A:1026108306755
![]() |
[38] |
Kucuksezgin F, Kayatekin BM, Uluturhan E, et al. (2008) Preliminary investigation of sensitive biomarkers of trace metal pollution in mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) from Izmir Bay (Turkey). Environ Monit Assess 141: 339-345. doi: 10.1007/s10661-007-9900-2
![]() |
[39] |
Cheung CCC, Zheng GJ, Li AM, et al. (2001) Relationships between tissue concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and antioxidative responses of marine mussels, Perna viridis. Aquat Toxicol 52: 189-203. doi: 10.1016/S0166-445X(00)00145-4
![]() |
[40] | Remacle J, Lambert D, Raes M, et al. (1992) Importance of various antioxidant enzymes for cell stability. Confrontation between theoretical and experimental data. Biochem J 286: 41-46. |
[41] |
Regoli F (2000) Total oxyradical scavenging capacity (TOSC) in polluted and translocated mussels: a predictive biomarker of oxidative stress. Aquat Toxicol 50: 351-61. doi: 10.1016/S0166-445X(00)00091-6
![]() |
[42] |
Doyotte A, Cossu C, Jacquin MC, et al. (1997) Antioxidant enzymes, glutathione and lipid peroxidation as relevant biomarkers of experimental or field exposure in the gills and the digestive gland of the freshwater bivalve Unio tumidus. Aquatic Toxicol 39: 93-110. doi: 10.1016/S0166-445X(97)00024-6
![]() |
1. | J. B. Shukla, Ram Naresh, Sandhya Rani Verma, Manju Agarwal, Modeling the effect of sanitation in a human habitat to control the spread of bacterial diseases, 2020, 6, 2363-6203, 39, 10.1007/s40808-019-00653-4 | |
2. | Harendra Verma, Nidhi Pandya, Vishnu Narayan Mishra, Pankaj Mathur, Modeling and analysis of media’s role in popularizing the blue whale game, 2020, 12, 2661-3352, 2050008, 10.1142/S2661335220500082 | |
3. | Fahad Al Basir, Arnab Banerjee, Santanu Ray, Exploring the effects of awareness and time delay in controlling malaria disease propagation, 2020, 0, 2191-0294, 10.1515/ijnsns-2019-0223 | |
4. | Aili Wang, Yanni Xiao, Robert Smith, Dynamics of a non-smooth epidemic model with three thresholds, 2020, 139, 1431-7613, 47, 10.1007/s12064-019-00297-z | |
5. | Arvind Kumar Misra, Rajanish Kumar Rai, Impacts of TV and radio advertisements on the dynamics of an infectious disease: A modeling study, 2019, 42, 0170-4214, 1262, 10.1002/mma.5438 | |
6. | Michael O. Adeniyi, Matthew I. Ekum, Iluno C, Ogunsanya A. S, Akinyemi J. A, Segun I. Oke, Matadi M. B, Dynamic model of COVID-19 disease with exploratory data analysis, 2020, 9, 24682276, e00477, 10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00477 | |
7. | Hani Al-Dmour, Ra’ed Masa’deh, Amer Salman, Mohammad Abuhashesh, Rand Al-Dmour, Influence of Social Media Platforms on Public Health Protection Against the COVID-19 Pandemic via the Mediating Effects of Public Health Awareness and Behavioral Changes: Integrated Model, 2020, 22, 1438-8871, e19996, 10.2196/19996 | |
8. | Rajanish Kumar Rai, Subhas Khajanchi, Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Ezio Venturino, Arvind Kumar Misra, Impact of social media advertisements on the transmission dynamics of COVID-19 pandemic in India, 2021, 1598-5865, 10.1007/s12190-021-01507-y | |
9. | Puji Andayani, 2019, 2183, 0094-243X, 090003, 10.1063/1.5136203 | |
10. | Hani Al-Dmour, Ra’ed Masa’deh, Amer Salman, Rand Al-Dmour, Mohammad Abuhashesh, The Role of Mass Media Interventions on Promoting Public Health Knowledge and Behavioral Social Change Against COVID-19 Pandemic in Jordan, 2022, 12, 2158-2440, 215824402210821, 10.1177/21582440221082125 | |
11. | Arvind Kumar Misra, Rajanish Kumar Rai, Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Maia Martcheva, Delay in budget allocation for vaccination and awareness induces chaos in an infectious disease model, 2021, 15, 1751-3758, 395, 10.1080/17513758.2021.1952322 | |
12. | Rakesh Medda, Samares Pal, Joydeb Bhattacharyya, 2022, Chapter 21, 978-3-031-12514-0, 383, 10.1007/978-3-031-12515-7_21 | |
13. | C. W. Chukwu, F. Nyabadza, Mathematical Modeling of Listeriosis Incorporating Effects of Awareness Programs, 2021, 13, 2070-0482, 723, 10.1134/S2070048221040116 | |
14. | Stephen Andriano-Moore, Yimeng Cai, 2022, Chapter 4, 978-981-19-5786-4, 45, 10.1007/978-981-19-5787-1_4 | |
15. | Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Rajanish Kumar Rai, Subhas Khajanchi, Rabindra Kumar Gupta, Arvind Kumar Misra, Dynamics of coronavirus pandemic: effects of community awareness and global information campaigns, 2021, 136, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01997-6 | |
16. | PANKAJ KUMAR TIWARI, RAJANISH KUMAR RAI, RABINDRA KUMAR GUPTA, MAIA MARTCHEVA, ARVIND KUMAR MISRA, MODELING THE CONTROL OF BACTERIAL DISEASE BY SOCIAL MEDIA ADVERTISEMENTS: EFFECTS OF AWARENESS AND SANITATION, 2022, 30, 0218-3390, 51, 10.1142/S0218339022500024 | |
17. | Norazryana Mat Dawi, Hamidreza Namazi, Petra Maresova, Predictors of COVID-19 Preventive Behavior Adoption Intention in Malaysia, 2021, 12, 1664-1078, 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616749 | |
18. | Chao Liu, Peng Chen, Qiyu Jia, Lora Cheung, Effects of Media Coverage on Global Stability Analysis and Optimal Control of an Age-Structured Epidemic Model with Multi-Staged Progression, 2022, 10, 2227-7390, 2712, 10.3390/math10152712 | |
19. | Nezahat EKİCİ, Semra DOĞAN, COVID-19 Pandemisine Yönelik Hazırlanan Kamu Spotları ve Sosyal Medya Kullanımının Sosyal Etki Üzerindeki Etkisinde Kaynak Güvenilirliğinin Aracılık Rolü, 2021, 21, 2667-8683, 769, 10.18037/ausbd.1001652 | |
20. | Kusum Lata, A. K. Misra, Y. Takeuchi, Modeling the effectiveness of TV and social media advertisements on the dynamics of water-borne diseases, 2022, 15, 1793-5245, 10.1142/S1793524521500698 | |
21. | Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Rajanish Kumar Rai, Arvind Kumar Misra, Joydev Chattopadhyay, Dynamics of Infectious Diseases: Local Versus Global Awareness, 2021, 31, 0218-1274, 2150102, 10.1142/S0218127421501029 | |
22. | Vijay Pal Bajiya, Jai Prakash Tripathi, Vipul Kakkar, Yun Kang, Modeling the impacts of awareness and limited medical resources on the epidemic size of a multi-group SIR epidemic model, 2022, 15, 1793-5245, 10.1142/S1793524522500450 | |
23. | Rabindra Kumar Gupta, Soumitra Pal, A. K. Misra, Modeling the impact of precautionary measures and sanitation practices broadcasted through media on the dynamics of bacterial diseases, 2023, 9, 2363-6203, 397, 10.1007/s40808-022-01469-5 | |
24. | Rebecca C. Tyson, Noah D. Marshall, Bert O. Baumgaertner, Transient prophylaxis and multiple epidemic waves, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 5616, 10.3934/math.2022311 | |
25. | Baoquan Zhou, Bingtao Han, Daqing Jiang, Tasawar Hayat, Ahmed Alsaedi, Ergodic stationary distribution and extinction of a hybrid stochastic SEQIHR epidemic model with media coverage, quarantine strategies and pre-existing immunity under discrete Markov switching, 2021, 410, 00963003, 126388, 10.1016/j.amc.2021.126388 | |
26. | Fabián Carrión, Abel Suing, Kruzkaya Ordóñez, información en la televisión andina durante la COVID-19, 2022, 9, 2695-9631, 1, 10.37467/revvisual.v9.3631 | |
27. | Chao Liu, Peng Chen, Lora Cheung, Ergodic Stationary Distribution and Threshold Dynamics of a Stochastic Nonautonomous SIAM Epidemic Model with Media Coverage and Markov Chain, 2022, 6, 2504-3110, 699, 10.3390/fractalfract6120699 | |
28. | Rajanish Kumar Rai, Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Subhas Khajanchi, Modeling the influence of vaccination coverage on the dynamics of COVID‐19 pandemic with the effect of environmental contamination, 2023, 0170-4214, 10.1002/mma.9185 | |
29. | A. K. Misra, Soumitra Pal, Rabindra Kumar Gupta, Modeling the Effect of TV and Social Media Advertisements on the Dynamics of Vector-Borne Disease Malaria, 2023, 33, 0218-1274, 10.1142/S0218127423500335 | |
30. | Rabindra Kumar Gupta, Rajanish Kumar Rai, Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Arvind Kumar Misra, Maia Martcheva, A mathematical model for the impact of disinfectants on the control of bacterial diseases, 2023, 17, 1751-3758, 10.1080/17513758.2023.2206859 | |
31. | Anna D. Fome, Herieth Rwezaura, Mamadou L. Diagne, Shannon Collinson, Jean M. Tchuenche, A deterministic Susceptible-Infected-Recovered model for studying the impact of media on epidemic dynamics, 2023, 27724425, 100189, 10.1016/j.health.2023.100189 | |
32. | Damianos P. Sakas, Dimitrios P. Reklitis, Marina C. Terzi, Leading Logistics Firms’ Re-Engineering through the Optimization of the Customer’s Social Media and Website Activity, 2023, 12, 2079-9292, 2443, 10.3390/electronics12112443 | |
33. | Kalyan Kumar Pal, Rajanish Kumar Rai, Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Yun Kang, Role of incentives on the dynamics of infectious diseases: implications from a mathematical model, 2023, 138, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04163-2 | |
34. | A. K. Misra, Kuldeep Kumar Tripathi, Maitri Verma, Modeling the effects of psychological fear and media-induced awareness on the dynamics of infectious diseases, 2023, 0, 1531-3492, 0, 10.3934/dcdsb.2023118 | |
35. | Anal Chatterjee, Suchandra Ganguly, 2023, Chapter 9, 978-3-031-33049-0, 153, 10.1007/978-3-031-33050-6_9 | |
36. | ARVIND KUMAR MISRA, MAMTA KUMARI, MODELING THE EFFECTS OF TV AND SOCIAL MEDIA ADVERTISEMENTS ON DIABETES, 2023, 31, 0218-3390, 1099, 10.1142/S0218339023500377 | |
37. | Rakesh Medda, Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Samares Pal, Chaos in a nonautonomous model for the impact of media on disease outbreak, 2023, 14, 1793-9623, 10.1142/S1793962323500204 | |
38. | Xueli Wang, Suxia Zhang, Coupling media coverage and susceptibility for modeling epidemic dynamics: An application to COVID-19, 2023, 03784754, 10.1016/j.matcom.2023.10.026 | |
39. | Ebenezer Bonyah, Y. Yuan, Shiv Mangal, Fractional stochastic modelling of dengue fever: The social awareness perspective, 2023, 22, 24682276, e01966, 10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01966 | |
40. | Arjun Kumar, Uma S. Dubey, Balram Dubey, The impact of social media advertisements and treatments on the dynamics of infectious diseases with optimal control strategies, 2023, 03784754, 10.1016/j.matcom.2023.12.015 | |
41. | Arjun Kumar, Uma S. Dubey, Balram Dubey, The impact of radio-chemotherapy on tumour cells interaction with optimal control and sensitivity analysis, 2024, 00255564, 109146, 10.1016/j.mbs.2024.109146 | |
42. | Shiv Mangal, Ebenezer Bonyah, Vijay Shankar Sharma, Y. Yuan, A novel fractional-order stochastic epidemic model to analyze the role of media awareness in the spread of conjunctivitis, 2024, 5, 27724425, 100302, 10.1016/j.health.2024.100302 | |
43. | Dev Sourav Panda, Rahul Dixit, Anuja Dixit, Harshitha Dwaracherla, Anupam Shukla, Mathematical Model and AI Integration for COVID-19: Improving Forecasting and Policy-Making, 2024, 5, 2661-8907, 10.1007/s42979-023-02574-7 | |
44. | Yang Deng, Daihai He, Yi Zhao, The impacts of anti-protective awareness and protective awareness programs on COVID-19 outbreaks, 2024, 180, 09600779, 114493, 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.114493 | |
45. | Yilin Tian, Chao Liu, Lora Cheung, Stationary distribution analysis of a stochastic SIAM epidemic model with Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process and media coverage, 2024, 08939659, 109041, 10.1016/j.aml.2024.109041 | |
46. | Hong Qiu, Rumei Hou, Dynamics and optimal control of an SEIAQR epidemic model with media coverage, 2024, 535, 0022247X, 128192, 10.1016/j.jmaa.2024.128192 | |
47. | Chao Liu, Yilin Tian, Peng Chen, Lora Cheung, Stochastic dynamic effects of media coverage and incubation on a distributed delayed epidemic system with Lévy jumps, 2024, 182, 09600779, 114781, 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.114781 | |
48. | Kalyan Kumar Pal, Nazmul Sk, Rajanish Kumar Rai, Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Examining the impact of incentives and vaccination on COVID-19 control in India: addressing environmental contamination and seasonal dynamics, 2024, 139, 2190-5444, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-04997-4 | |
49. | Makayla Preston, Alexandria Carter, Eric Numfor, Modeling the Effects of Media Awareness on SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in Georgia, 2024, 10, 2349-5103, 10.1007/s40819-024-01759-9 | |
50. | Aditya Pandey, Archana Singh Bhadauria, Vijai Shanker Verma, Rachana Pathak, Effect of awareness and saturated treatment on the transmission of infectious diseases, 2024, 12, 2544-7297, 10.1515/cmb-2023-0119 | |
51. | Kalyan Kumar Pal, Rajanish Kumar Rai, Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Influences of Media-Induced Awareness and Sanitation Practices on Cholera Epidemic: A Study of Bifurcation and Optimal Control, 2025, 35, 0218-1274, 10.1142/S0218127425500026 | |
52. | Kalyan Kumar Pal, Rajanish Kumar Rai, Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Impact of psychological fear and media on infectious diseases induced by carriers, 2024, 34, 1054-1500, 10.1063/5.0217936 |
Parameter | Values | Parameter | Values |
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Parameter | Values | Parameter | Values |
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|