Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article

Remarks on an elliptic problem arising in weighted energy estimates for wave equations with space-dependent damping term in an exterior domain

  • Received: 17 August 2016 Accepted: 01 November 2016 Published: 22 November 2016
  • This paper is concerned with weighted energy estimates and diffusion phenomena for the initial-boundary problem of the wave equation with space-dependent damping term in an exterior domain. In this analysis, an elliptic problem was introduced by Todorova and Yordanov. This attempt was quite useful when the coefficient of the damping term is radially symmetric. In this paper, by modifying their elliptic problem, we establish weighted energy estimates and diffusion phenomena even when the coefficient of the damping term is not radially symmetric.

    Citation: Sobajima Motohiro, Wakasugi Yuta. Remarks on an elliptic problem arising in weighted energy estimates for wave equations with space-dependent damping term in an exterior domain[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2017, 2(1): 1-15. doi: 10.3934/Math.2017.1.1

    Related Papers:

    [1] Xiongmei Fan, Sen Ming, Wei Han, Zikun Liang . Lifespan estimate of solution to the semilinear wave equation with damping term and mass term. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 17860-17889. doi: 10.3934/math.2023910
    [2] Keltoum Bouhali, Sulima Ahmed Zubair, Wiem Abedelmonem Salah Ben Khalifa, Najla ELzein AbuKaswi Osman, Khaled Zennir . A new strict decay rate for systems of longitudinal m-nonlinear viscoelastic wave equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 962-976. doi: 10.3934/math.2023046
    [3] Abdelkader Moumen, Abderrahmane Beniani, Tariq Alraqad, Hicham Saber, Ekram. E. Ali, Keltoum Bouhali, Khaled Zennir . Energy decay of solution for nonlinear delayed transmission problem. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 13815-13829. doi: 10.3934/math.2023707
    [4] Adel M. Al-Mahdi, Maher Noor, Mohammed M. Al-Gharabli, Baowei Feng, Abdelaziz Soufyane . Stability analysis for a Rao-Nakra sandwich beam equation with time-varying weights and frictional dampings. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 12570-12587. doi: 10.3934/math.2024615
    [5] Adel M. Al-Mahdi, Mohammad M. Al-Gharabli, Maher Nour, Mostafa Zahri . Stabilization of a viscoelastic wave equation with boundary damping and variable exponents: Theoretical and numerical study. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 15370-15401. doi: 10.3934/math.2022842
    [6] Hatice Taskesen . Qualitative results for a relativistic wave equation with multiplicative noise and damping terms. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 15232-15254. doi: 10.3934/math.2023778
    [7] Li-Ming Yeh . Lipschitz estimate for elliptic equations with oscillatory coefficients. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 29135-29166. doi: 10.3934/math.20241413
    [8] Farman Ali Shah, Kamran, Zareen A Khan, Fatima Azmi, Nabil Mlaiki . A hybrid collocation method for the approximation of 2D time fractional diffusion-wave equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 27122-27149. doi: 10.3934/math.20241319
    [9] Mohammad Kafini, Shadi Al-Omari . Local existence and lower bound of blow-up time to a Cauchy problem of a coupled nonlinear wave equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 9059-9074. doi: 10.3934/math.2021526
    [10] Waled Al-Khulaifi, Manal Alotibi, Nasser-Eddine Tatar . Exponential decay in a delayed wave equation with variable coefficients. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 27770-27783. doi: 10.3934/math.20241348
  • This paper is concerned with weighted energy estimates and diffusion phenomena for the initial-boundary problem of the wave equation with space-dependent damping term in an exterior domain. In this analysis, an elliptic problem was introduced by Todorova and Yordanov. This attempt was quite useful when the coefficient of the damping term is radially symmetric. In this paper, by modifying their elliptic problem, we establish weighted energy estimates and diffusion phenomena even when the coefficient of the damping term is not radially symmetric.


    1. Introduction

    Let N2. We consider the wave equation with space-dependent damping term in an exterior domain ΩRN with a smooth boundary:

    {uttΔu+a(x)ut=0,xΩ, t>0,u(x,t)=0,xΩ, t>0,(u,ut)(x,0)=(u0,u1)(x),xΩ, (1.1)

    where we denote by Δ the usual Laplacian in RN and by ut and utt the first and second derivative of u with respect to the variable t, and u=u(x,t) is a real-valued unknown function. The coefficient of the damping term a(x) satisfies aC2(¯Ω), a(x)>0 on ¯Ω and

    lim|x|(xαa(x))=a0 (1.2)

    with some constants α[0,1) and a0(0,), where y=(1+|y|2)12 for yRN. In this moment, the initial data (u0,u1) are assumed to have compact supports in Ω and to satisfy the compatibility condition of order k1:

    (u1,u)(H2H10(Ω))×H10(Ω),for all =1,,k (1.3)

    where u is successively defined by u=Δu2a(x)u1 (=2,,k). We note that existence and uniqueness of solution to the problem (1.1) have been discussed (see e.g., Ikawa [2, Theorem 2]).

    It is proved in Matsumura [4] that if Ω=RN and a(x)1, then the solution u of (1.1) satisfies the energy decay estimate

    RN(|u(x,t)|2+|ut(x,t)|2)dxC(1+t)N21(u0,u1)2H1×L2,

    where the constant C depends on the size of the supprot of initial data. Moreover, it is shown in Nishihara [7] that u has the same asymptotic behavior as the one of the problem

    {vtΔv=0,xRN, t>0,v(x,0)=u0(x)+u1(x),xRN. (1.4)

    In particular, we have

    u(,t)v(,t)L2=o(tN4)

    as t. Energy decay properties of solutions to (1.1) for general cases with a(x)xα (0α1) have been dealt with by Matsumura [5]. On the other hand, Mochizuki [6] proved that if 0a(x)Cxα for some α>1, then the energy of the solution to (1.1) does not vanish as t for suitable initial data. (The solution has an asymptotic behavior similar to the solution of the usual wave equation without damping). Therefore one can expect that diffusion phenomena occur only when a(x)Cxα for α1.

    In this paper, we discuss precise decay rates of the weighted energy

    RN(|u(x,t)|2+|ut(x,t)|2)Φ(x,t)dx

    with a special weight function

    Φ(x,t)=exp(βA(x)1+t)

    (for some AC2(RN) and β>0) which is introduced by Todorova and Yordanov [12] based on the ideas in [11] and in [3]. They proved weighted energy estimates

    RNa(x)|u(x,t)|2Φ(x,t)dxC(1+t)Nα2α+ε,RN(|u(x,t)|2+|ut(x,t)|2)Φ(x,t)dxC(1+t)Nα2α1+ε

    when a(x) is radially symmetric and satisfies (1.2). After that, Radu, Todorova and Yordanov [8] extended it to higher-order derivatives. In [13], the second author proved diffusion phenomena for (1.1) with Ω=RN and a(x)=xα (α[0,1)) by comparing the solution of the following problem

    {a(x)vtΔv=0,xRN, t>0,v(x,0)=u0(x)+1a(x)u1(x),xRN. (1.5)

    In [10], diffusion phenomena for (1.1) with an exterior domain and for general radially symmetric damping term are obtained. However, the weighted energy estimates and diffusion phenomena for (1.1) with non-radially symmetric damping are still remaining open. The difficulty seems to come from the choice of auxiliary function A in the weighted energy, which strongly depends on the existence of positive solution to the Poisson equation ΔA(x)=a(x). In fact, an example of non-existence of positive solution to ΔA=a for non-radial a(x) is shown in [10]. Radu, Todorova and Yordanov [9] considered the case Ω=RN and used a solution A(x) of ΔA=a1(1+|x|)α with a1>0 satisfying a1(1+|x|)αa(x) for xRN, that is, A(x) is a subsolution of the equation ΔA=a. In general one cannot obtain the optimal decay estimate via this choice because of the luck of the precise behavior of a(x) at the spatial infinity which can be expected to determine the precise decay late of weighted energy estimates. Our main idea to overcome this difficulty is to weaken the equality ΔA=a and consider the inequality (1ε)aΔA(1+ε)a, and to construct a solution having appropriate behavior, we employ a cut-off argument.

    The aim of this paper is to give a proof of Ikehata-Todorova-Yordanov type weighted energy estimates for (1.1) with non-radially symmetric damping and to obtain diffusion phenomena for (1.1) under the compatibility condition of order 1 and the condition (1.2) (without any restriction).

    This paper is originated as follows. In Section 2, we discuss related elliptic and parabolic problems. The weighted energy estimates for (1.1) are established in Section 3 (Proposition 3.5). Section 4 is devoted to show diffusion phenomena (Proposition 4.1).


    2. Related elliptic and parabolic problems


    2.1. An elliptic problem for weighted energy estimates

    As we mentioned above, in general, existence of positive solutions to the Poisson equation ΔA(x)=a(x) is false for non-radial a(x). Thus, we weaken this equation and consider the following inequality

    (1ε)a(x)ΔA(x)(1+ε)a(x),xΩ, (2.1)

    where ε(0,1) is a parameter. Here we construct a positive solution A of (2.1) satisfying

    A1εx2αA(x)A2εx2α, (2.2)
    |A(x)|2a(x)A(x)2αNα+ε (2.3)

    for some constants A1ε,A2ε>0.

    Lemma 2.1. For every ε(0,1), there exists AεC2(¯Ω) such that Aε satisfies (2.1)-(2.3).

    Proof. Firstly, we extend a(x) as a positive function in C2(RN); note that this is possible by virtue of the smoothness of Ω. To simplify the notation, we use the same symbol a(x) as a function defined on RN. We construct a solution of approximated equation

    ΔAε(x)=aε(x),xRN

    for some aεC2(RN) satisfying

    (1ε)a(x)aε(x)(1+ε)a(x),xRN. (2.4)

    Noting (1.2), we divide a(x) as a(x)=b1(x)+b2(x) with

    b1(x)=Δ(a0(Nα)(2α)x2α)=a0xα+a0αNαxα2,b2(x)=a(x)a0xαa0αNαxα2.

    Then we have

    lim|x|(b2(x)a(x))=lim|x|[1xαa(x)(xαa(x)a0a0αNαx2)]=0. (2.5)

    Let ε(0,1) be fixed. Then by (2.5) there exists a constant Rε>0 such that |b2(x)|εa(x) for xRNB(0,Rε). Here we introduce a cut-off function ηεCc(RN,[0,1]) such that ηε1 on B(0,Rε). Define

    aε(x):=b1(x)+ηε(x)b2(x)=a(x)(1ηε(x))b2(x),xRN.

    Then aε(x)=a(x) on B(0,Rε) and for xRNB(0,Rε),

    |aε(x)a(x)1|=(1ηε(x))|b2(x)|a(x)ε

    and therefore (2.4) is verified.

    Next we define

    B1ε(x):=a0(Nα)(2α)x2α,xRN,B2ε(x):=RNN(xy)ηε(y)b2(y)dy,xRN,

    where N is the Newton potential given by

    N(x)={12πlog1|x|if N=2,Γ(N2+1)N(N2)πN2|x|2Nif N3.

    Then we easily see that ΔB1ε(x)=b1(x) and ΔB2ε=ηε(x)b2(x). Moreover, noting that supp(ηεb2) is compact, we see from a direct calculation that there exist a constant Mε>0 such that

    |B2ε(x)|{Mε(1+logx)if N=2,Mεx2Nif N3,|B2ε(x)|Mεx1N,xRN.

    This yields that Bε:=B1ε+B2ε is bounded from below and positive for xRN with sufficiently large |x|. Moreover, we have

    lim|x|(xα2Bε(x))=a0(Nα)(2α)

    and

    lim|x|(|Bε(x)|2a(x)Bε(x))=lim|x|(1xαa(x)1xα2Bε(x)|a0Nαx1x+xα1B2ε(x)|2)=2αNα.

    Using the same argument as in the proof of [10, Lemma 3.1], we can see that there exists a constant λε0 such that Aε(x):=λε+Bε(x) satisfies (2.1)-(2.3).


    2.2. A parabolic problem for diffusion phenomena

    Here we consider Lp-Lq type estimates for solutions to the initial-boundary value problem of the following parabolic equation

    {a(x)wtΔw=0,xΩ, t>0,w(x,t)=0,xΩ, t>0,w(x,0)=f(x),xΩ. (2.6)

    Here we introduce a weighted Lp-spaces

    Lpdμ:={fLploc(Ω);fLpdμ:=(Ω|f(x)|pa(x)dx)1p<},1p<

    which is quite reasonable because the corresponding elliptic operator a(x)1Δ can be regarded as a symmetric operator in L2dμ.

    The Lp-Lq type estimates for the semigroup associated with the Friedrichs' extension L (in L2dμ) of a(x)1Δ are stated in [10]. The proof is based on Beurling-Deny's criterion and Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality.

    Proposition 2.2 ([10, Proposition 2.6]). Let etL be a semigroup generated by L. For every fL1dμL2dμ, we have

    etLfL2dμCtNα2(2α)fL1dμ (2.7)

    and

    LetLfL2dμCtNα2(2α)1fL1dμ. (2.8)

    3. Weighted energy estimates

    In this section we establish weighted energy estimates for solutions of (1.1) by introducing Ikehata-Todorova-Yordanov type weight function with an auxiliary function A" constructed in Subsection 2.1.

    To begin with, let us recall the finite speed propagation property of the wave equation (see [2]).

    Lemma 3.1 (Finite speed of propagation). Let u be the solution of (1.1) with the initial data (u0, u1) satisfying supp(u0,u1)¯B(0,R0)={xΩ;|x|R0}. Then, one has

    suppu(,t){xΩ;|x|R0+t}

    and therefore |x|/(R0+1+t)1 for t0 and xsuppu(,t).

    Before introducing a weight function, we also recall two identities for partial energy functionals proved in [10].

    Lemma 3.2 ([10, Lemma 3.7]). Let ΦC2(¯Ω×[0,)) satisfy Φ>0 and tΦ<0 and let u be a solution of (1.1). Then

    ddt[Ω(|u|2+|ut|2)Φdx]=Ω(tΦ)1|tΦuutΦ|2dx+Ω(2a(x)Φ+tΦ(tΦ)1|Φ|2)|ut|2dx.

    Lemma 3.3 ([10, Lemma 3.9]). Let ΦC2(¯Ω×[0,)) satisfy Φ>0 and tΦ<0 and let u be a solution to (1.1). Then, we have

    ddt[Ω(2uut+a(x)|u|2)Φdx]=2Ωuut(tΦ)dx+2Ω|ut|2Φdx2Ω|u|2Φdx+Ω(a(x)tΦ+ΔΦ)|u|2dx.

    Here we introduce a weight function for weighted energy estimates, which is a modification of the one in Todorova-Yordanov [12].

    Definition 3.4. Define h:=2αNα and for ε(0,1),

    Φε(x,t)=exp(1h+2εAε(x)1+t), (3.1)

    where Aε is given in Lemma 2.1. And define for t0,

    Ex(t;u):=Ω|u|2Φεdx,Et(t;u):=Ω|ut|2Φεdx, (3.2)
    Ea(t;u):=Ωa(x)|u|2Φεdx,E(t;u):=2ΩuutΦεdx, (3.3)

    and also define E1(t;u):=Ex(t;u)+Et(t;u) and E2(t;u):=E(t;u)+Ea(t;u).

    Now we are in a position to state our main result for weighted energy estimates for solutions of (1.1).

    Proposition 3.5. Assume that (u0, u1) satisfies supp(u0,u1)¯B(0,R0) and the compatibility condition of order k01. Let u be a solution of the problem (1.1). For every δ>0 and 0kk01, there exist ε>0 and Mδ,k,R0>0 such that for every t0,

    (1+t)Nα2α+2k+1δ(Ex(t;ktu)+Et(t;ktu))+(1+t)Nα2α+2kδEa(t;ktu)Mδ,k,R0(u0,u1)2Hk+1×Hk(Ω).

    To prove, this, we prepare the following two lemmas.

    Lemma 3.6. For t≥0, we have

    1εh+2ε11+tEa(t;u)Ex(t;u). (3.4)

    Proof. As in the proof of [10, Lemma 3.6], by integration by parts we have

    ΩΔ(logΦε)|u|2Φεdx=Ω(ΔΦε|Φε|2Φε)|u|2dxΩ|u|2Φεdx.

    Noting that

    Δ(logΦε(x))=1h+2εΔAε(x)1+t1εh+2εa(x)1+t,

    we have (3.4).

    In order to clarify the effect of the finite propagation property, we now put

    a1:=infxΩ(xαa(x)).

    Then

    Lemma 3.7. For t≥0, we have

    Et(t;u)1a1(R0+1+t)αEa(t;tu), (3.5)
    ΩAε(x)a(x)|ut|2ΦεdxA2εa1(R0+1+t)2Et(t;u), (3.6)
    |E(t;u)|2a1(R0+1+t)α2Ea(t;u)Et(t;u). (3.7)

    Proof. By a(x)1a11xαa11(1+|x|)α and the finite propagation property we have

    Ω|ut|2Φεdx=Ωa(x)a(x)|ut|2Φεdx1a1(R0+1+t)αEa(t;tu).

    Using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the above inequality yields (3.6):

    |ΩuutΦεdx|2(Ω|u|2Φεdx)(Ω|ut|2Φεdx)(R0+1+t)αa1(Ωa(x)|u|2Φεdx)Et(t;u)(R0+1+t)αa1Ea(t;u)Et(t;u).

    We can prove (3.7) in a similar way.

    Lemma 3.8. (i) For every t≥0, we have

    ddtE1(t;u)Ea(t;tu). (3.8)

    (ii) For every ε(0,13) and t0,

    ddtE2(t;u)13ε1εEx(t;u)+(2a1+A2ε(R0+1)2εa21)(R0+1+t)αEa(t;tu). (3.9)

    Proof. Noting (2.3), we have

    2a(x)Φε+tΦε(tΦε)1|Φε|2=(2a(x)Aε(x)(h+2ε)(1+t)2+1h+2ε|Aε(x)|2Aε(x))Φε(2a(x)+h+εh+2εa(x))Φεa(x)Φε.

    This implies (3.8). On the other hand, from (2.3) and (2.1) we see

    a(x)tΦε+ΔΦε=1h+2ε(a(x)Aε(x)(1+t)2+|Aε(x)|2(h+2ε)(1+t)2+ΔAε(x)1+t)Φε1h+2ε(a(x)Aε(x)(1+t)2+(h+ε)a(x)Aε(x)(h+2ε)(1+t)2+(1+ε)a(x)1+t)Φε(ε(h+2ε)2a(x)Aε(x)(1+t)2+1+εh+2εa(x)1+t)Φε.

    Therefore combining it with Lemma 3.6, we have

    Ω(a(x)tΦε+ΔΦε)|u|2dx1+ε1εΩ|u|2Φεdxε(h+2ε)21(1+t)2Ωa(x)Aε(x)|u|2Φεdx.

    Using (3.6), we have

    2Ωuut(tΦε)dx=2h+2ε1(1+t)2ΩuutAε(x)Φεdx2h+2ε1(1+t)2(Ωa(x)Aε(x)|u|2Φεdx)12(ΩAε(x)a(x)|ut|2Φεdx)122(R0+1)h+2ε11+t(Ωa(x)Aε(x)|u|2Φεdx)12(A2εa1Et(t;u))12ε(h+2ε)21(1+t)2Ωa(x)Aε(x)|u|2Φεdx+A2ε(R0+1)2εa1Et(t;u).

    Applying (3.5), we obtain (3.9).

    Lemma 3.9. The following assertions hold:

    (i) Set t(R0,α,m):=max{(2ma1)11α,R0+1}. Then for every t,m0 and t1t(R0,α,m),

    ddt((t1+t)mE1(t;u))m(t1+t)m1Ex(t;u)12(t1+t)mEa(t;tu). (3.10)

    (ii) for every, t,λ0 and t2R0+1,

    ddt((t2+t)λE2(t;u))λ(1+ε)(t2+t)λ1Ea(t;u)13ε1ε(t2+t)λEx(t;u)+(2a1+A2ε(R0+1)2εa21+λ2εa21t1α2)(t2+t)λ+αEa(t;tu). (3.11)

    (iii) In particular, setting

    ν:=4a1+2A2ε(R0+1)2εa21+14εa1,t(ε,R0,α,λ):=max{((1ε)(λ+α)νε)11α,(2(λ+α)a1)11α,R0+1},

    one has that for t,λ0 and t3t(ε,R0,α,λ),

    ddt(ν(t3+t)λ+αE1(t;u)+(t3+t)λE2(t;u))14ε1ε(t3+t)λEx(t;u)+λ(1+ε)(t3+t)λ1Ea(t;u). (3.12)

    Proof. (i) Let m0 be fixed and let t1t(R0,α,m). Using (3.8) and (3.5), we have

    (t1+t)mddt((t1+t)mE1(t;u))mt1+tEx(t;u)+mt1+tEt(t;u)+ddtE1(t;u)mt1+tEx(t;u)+mt1+tEt(t;u)Ea(t;tu)mt1+tEx(t;u)+(m(R0+1+t)αa1(t1+t)1)Ea(t;tu).

    Therefore we obtain (3.10).

    (ii) For t0, and tR0+1,

    (t2+t)λddt((t2+t)λE2(t;u))λt2+tE(t;u)+λt2+tEa(t;u)+ddtE2(t;u)λt2+tE(t;u)+λt2+tEa(t;u)13ε1εEx(t;u)+(2a1+A2ε(R0+1)2εa21)(R0+1+t)αEa(t;tu).

    Noting that by (3.7) and (3.5),

    λt2+tE(t;u)2λ(R0+1+t)αa1(t2+t)Ea(t;u)Ea(t;tu)λεt2+tEa(t;u)+λεa21(R0+1+t)2αt2+tEa(t;tu)λεt2+tEa(t;u)+λεa21t1α2(t2+t)αEa(t;tu),

    we deduce (3.11).

    (iii) Combining (3.10) with m=λ+α and (3.11), we have for t3t(ε,R0,α,λ) and t0,

    ddt(ν(t3+t)λ+αE1(t;u)+(t3+t)λE2(t;u))(ν(λ+α)(t3+t)α113ε1ε)(t3+t)λEx(t;u)+λ(1+ε)(t3+t)λ1Ea(t;u)+(2a1+A2ε(R0+1)2εa21+λ2εa21t1α3ν2)(t3+t)λ+αEa(t;tu)14ε1ε(t3+t)λEx(t;u)+λ(1+ε)(t3+t)λ1Ea(t;u).

    This proves the assertion.

    Proof of Proposition 3.5. Firstly, by (3.7) we observe that

    ν(t3+t)αE1(t;u)+E2(t;u)4a1(t3+t)αE1(t;u)|E(t;u)|+Ea(t;u)4a1(t3+t)αEt(t;u)2a1(t3+t)α2Ea(t;u)Et(t;u)+Ea(t;u)34Ea(t;u).

    By using the above estimate, we prove the assertion via mathematical induction.

    Step 1 (k = 0). By (3.12) using Lemma 3.6 implies that

    ddt(ν(t3+t)λ+αE1(t;u)+(t3+t)λE2(t;u))(14ε1ε+λ(1+ε)(h+2ε)1ε)(t3+t)λEx(t;u).

    Therefore taking λ0=(1ε)(14ε)(1+ε)(h+2ε), (λ0h1 as ε0) we have

    ddt(ν(t3+t)λ0+αE1(t;u)+(t3+t)λ0E2(t;u))ε(14ε)1ε(t3+t)λ0Ex(t;u).

    Integrating over (0, t) with respect to t, we see

    34(t3+t)λ0Ea(t;u)+ε(14ε)1εt0(t3+s)λ0Ex(s;u)dsν(t3+t)λ0+αE1(t;u)+(t3+t)λ0E2(t;u)+ε(14ε)1εt0(t3+s)λ0Ex(s;u)dsνtλ0+α3E1(0;u)+tλ03E2(0;u).

    Using (3.10) with m=λ0+1 and integrating over (0, t), we obtain

    (t3+t)λ0+1E1(t;u)+12t0(t3+s)λ0+1Ea(s;tu)dstλ0+13E1(0;u)+(λ0+1)t0(t3+s)λ0Ex(s;u)dstλ0+13E1(0;u)+(λ0+1)(1ε)ε(14ε)(νtλ0+α3E1(0;u)+tλ03E2(0;u)).

    This proves the desired assertion with k = 0 and also the integrability of (t3+s)λ0+1Ea(s;tu).

    Step 2 (1<kk01)). Suppose that for every t≥0,

    (1+t)λ0+2k1E1(t;k1tu)+(1+t)λ0+2k2Ea(t;k1tu)Mε,k1(u0,u1)2Hk×Hk1(Ω)

    and additionally,

    t0(1+s)λ0+2k1Ea(s;ktu)dsMε,k1(u0,u1)2Hk×Hk1(Ω).

    Since the initial value (u0,u1) satisfies the compatibility condition of order k, ktu is also a solution of (1.1) with replaced (u0,u1) with (uk1,uk). Applying (3.12) with λ=λ0+2k, putting t3k=t(ε,R0,α,λ0+2k) (see Lemma 3.9 (iii)) and integrating over (0, t), we have

    34(t3k+t)λ0+2kEa(t;ktu)+14ε1εt0(t3k+s)λ0+2kEx(s;ktu)dsν(t3k+t)λ0+2k+αE1(t;ktu)+(t3k+t)λ0+2kE2(t;ktu)+14ε1εt0(t3k+s)λ0+2kEx(s;ktu)dsνtλ0+2k+α3kE1(0;ktu)+tλ0+2k3kE2(0;ktu)+(λ0+2k)(1+ε)t0(t3k+s)λ0+2k1Ea(s;ktu)dsνtλ0+2k+α3kE1(0;ktu)+tλ0+2k13kE2(0;ktu)+(λ0+2k)(1+ε)Mε,k1(u0,u1)2Hk×Hk1(Ω).

    Moreover, from (3.10) with m=λ0+2k+1 we have

    (t3k+t)λ0+2k+1E1(t;ktu)+12t0(t3k+s)λ0+2k+1Ea(s;k+1tu)dstλ0+2k+13kE1(0;ktu)+(λ0+2k+1)t0(t3k+s)λ0+2kEx(s;ktu)dsMε,k(E1(0;ktu)+E2(0;ktu)+(u0,u1)2Hk×Hk1(Ω))

    with some constant Mε,k>0. By induction we obtain the desired inequalities for all kk01.


    4. Diffusion phenomena as an application of weighted energy estimates

    Proposition 4.1. Assume that (u0,u1)(H2H10(Ω))×H10(Ω) and suppose that supp(u0,u1)¯B(0,R0). Let u be the solution of (1.1). Then for every ε>0, there exists a constant Cε,R0>0 such that

    u(,t)etL[u0+a()1u1]L2dμCε,R0(1+t)Nα2(2α)1α2α+ε(u0,u1)H2×H1.

    To prove Proposition 4.1 we use the following lemma stated in [10, Section 4].

    Lemma 4.2. Assume that (u0,u1)(H2H10(Ω))×H10(Ω) and suppose that supp(u0,u1){xΩ;|x|R0}. Then for every t0,

    u(x,t)etL[u0+a()1u1]=tt/2e(ts)L[a()1utt(,s)]dset2L[a()1ut(,t/2)]t/20Le(ts)L[a()1ut(,s)]ds, (4.1)

    where L is the (negative) Friedrichs extension of L=a(x)1Δ in L2dμ.

    Proof of Proposition 4.1. First we show the assertion for (u0, u1) satisfying the compatibility condition of order 2. Taking L2dμ -norm of both side, we have

    u(x,)etL[u0+a()1u1]L2dμJ1(t)+J2(t)+J3(t),

    where

    J1(t):=tt/2e(ts)L[a()1utt(,s)]L2dμds,J2(t):=et2L[a()1ut(,t/2)]L2dμ,J3(t):=t/20Le(ts)L[a()1ut(,s)]L2dμds.

    Noting that for xΩ,

    a(x)1Φε(x,t)11a1xαexp(A1εh+2εx2α1+t)1a1(α(h+2ε)(2α)eA1ε)α2α(1+t)α2α,

    we see that for k = 0, 1,

    a()1k+1tu(,s)2L2dμ=Ωa(x)1|k+1tu(,s)|2dxa()1Φε(,t)1L(Ω)Ω|k+1tu(,s)|2Φεdx˜C(1+t)α2αEt(t,ktu)˜CMε,k(1+t)λ022α2α2k(u0,u1)2Hk+1×Hk.

    Therefore from Proposition 3.5 with k = 1 and k = 0 we have

    J1(t)tt/2a()1utt(,s)L2dμds˜CM1(u0,u1)H2×H1tt/2(1+s)λ021α2α1ds2(2α)λ0(2α)+1α˜CMε,1(1+t)λ021α2α(u0,u1)H2×H1

    and

    J2(t)a()1ut(,t/2)L2dμ˜CMε,0(1+t)λ021α2α(u0,u1)H1×L2.

    Moreover, by Lemma 2.2, we see by Cauchy-Schwarz inequality that for t≥1,

    J3(t)Ct/20(ts)Nα2(2α)1a()1ut(,s)L1dμdsC(t2)Nα2(2α)1t/20Φ1ε(,s)L1(Ω)Et(s;u)ds.

    Since

    Φ1(,t)L1(Ω)RNexp(A1εh+2ε|x|2α1+t)dx=(1+t)N2αRNexp(A1εh+2ε|y|2α)dy,

    we deduce

    J3(t)C(1+t)Nα2(2α)1(u0,u1)H1×L2t/20(1+s)Nα2(2α)λ021α2αdsC(Nα2(2α)λ02+12α)(1+t)Nα2(2α)1(1+t/2)Nα2(2α)λ021α2α+1(u0,u1)H1×L2C(1+t)λ021α2α(u0,u1)H1×L2.

    Consequently, we obtain

    u(,t)etL[u0+a()1u1]L2dμC(1+t)λ021α2α(u0,u1)H2×H1.

    Next we show the assertion for (u0,u1) satisfying (u0,u1)(H2×H10(Ω))×H10(Ω) (the compatibility condition of order 1) via an approximation argument. Fix ϕCc(RN,[0,1]) such that ϕ1 on ¯B(0,R0) and ϕ0 on RNB(0,R0+1) and define for nN,

    (u0nu1n)=(ϕ˜u0nϕ˜u1n),(˜u0n˜u1n)=(1+1nA)1(u0u1),

    where A is an m-accretive operator in H=H10(Ω)×L2(Ω) associated with (1.1), that is,

    A=(01Δa(x))

    endowed with domain D(A)=(H2H10(Ω))×H10(Ω). Then (u0n,u1n) satisfies supp(u0n,u1n)¯B(0,R0+1) and the compatibility condition of order 2. Let vn be a solution of (1.1) with (u0n,u1n). Observe that

    (u0n,u1n)2H2×H1C2ϕ2W2,(˜u0,˜u1)2H2×H1C2ϕ2W2,((˜u0,˜u1)2H+A(˜u0,˜u1)2H)C2ϕ2W2,((u0,u1)2H+A(u0,u1)2H)C2ϕ2W2,(u0,u1)2H2×H1

    with suitable constants C, C, C>0, and

    (u0nu1n)(ϕu0ϕu1)=(u0u1)in H

    as n and also u0n+a1u1nu0+a1u1 in L2dμ as n. Using the result of the previous step, we deduce

    vn(,t)etL[u0n+a()1u1n]L2dμ˜C(1+t)λ021α2α(u0,u1)H2×H1

    with some constant ˜C>0. Letting n, by continuity of the C0-semigroup etA in H we also obtain diffusion phenomena for initial data in (H2H10(Ω))H10(Ω).


    Acknowledgments

    This work is supported by Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows 15J01600 of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and also partially supported by Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists Research (B), No. 16K17619. The authors would like to thank the referee for giving them valuable comments and suggestions.


    Conflict of Interest

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.


    [1] M. Ikawa, Mixed problems for hyperbolic equations of second order, J. Math. Soc. Japan, 20 (1968), 580-608.
    [2] M. Ikawa, M. Ikawa, Hyperbolic partial differential equations and wave phenomena, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2000.
    [3] R. Ikehata, Some remarks on the wave equation with potential type damping coefficients, Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., 21 (2005), 19-24.
    [4] A. Matsumura, On the asymptotic behavior of solutions of semi-linear wave equations, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci., 12 (1976), 169-189.
    [5] A. Matsumura, Energy decay of solutions of dissipative wave equations, Proc. Japan Acad., Ser. A, 53 (1977), 232-236.
    [6] K. Mochizuki, Scattering theory for wave equations with dissipative terms, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci., 12 (1976), 383-390.
    [7] K. Nishihara, Lp-Lq estimates of solutions to the damped wave equation in 3-dimensional space and their application, Math. Z., 244 (2003), 631-649.
    [8] P. Radu, G. Todorova, and B. Yordanov, Higher order energy decay rates for damped wave equations with variable coefficients, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S, 2 (2009), 609-629.
    [9] P. Radu, G. Todorova, and B. Yordanov, Decay estimates for wave equations with variable coefficients, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 362 (2010), 2279-2299.
    [10] M. Sobajima and Y. Wakasugi, Diffusion phenomena for the wave equation with space-dependent damping in an exterior domain, J. Differential Equations, 261 (2016), 5690-5718.
    [11] G. Todorova, and B. Yordanov, Critical exponent for a nonlinear wave equation with damping, J. Differential Equations, 174 (2001), 464-489.
    [12] G. Todorova, and B. Yordanov, Weighted L2-estimates for dissipative wave equations with variable coefficients, J. Differential Equations, 246 (2009), 4497-4518.
    [13] Y.Wakasugi, On diffusion phenomena for the linear wave equation with space-dependent damping, J. Hyp. Diff. Eq., 11 (2014), 795-819.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Motohiro Sobajima, Yuta Wakasugi, Weighted energy estimates for wave equation with space-dependent damping term for slowly decaying initial data, 2019, 21, 0219-1997, 1850035, 10.1142/S0219199718500359
    2. Kenji Nishihara, Motohiro Sobajima, Yuta Wakasugi, Critical exponent for the semilinear wave equations with a damping increasing in the far field, 2018, 25, 1021-9722, 10.1007/s00030-018-0546-2
    3. Motohiro SOBAJIMA, Yuta WAKASUGI, Supersolutions for parabolic equations with unbounded or degenerate diffusion coefficients and their applications to some classes of parabolic and hyperbolic equations, 2021, -1, 0025-5645, 10.2969/jmsj/83928392
    4. Yuta Wakasugi, Decay property of solutions to the wave equation with space‐dependent damping, absorbing nonlinearity, and polynomially decaying data, 2023, 0170-4214, 10.1002/mma.8957
    5. Motohiro Sobajima, Yuta Wakasugi, Asymptotic expansion of solutions to the wave equation with space-dependent damping, 2023, 18758576, 1, 10.3233/ASY-231834
    6. Xiaoyan Li, Ryo Ikehata, Fast energy decay for wave equation with a monotone potential and an effective damping, 2024, 21, 0219-8916, 255, 10.1142/S0219891624500085
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2017 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5561) PDF downloads(1200) Cited by(6)

Article outline

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog