An application of heuristic optimization algorithm for demand response in smart grids with renewable energy

Mohammed Jalalah; Lyu-Guang Hua; Ghulam Hafeez; Safeer Ullah; Hisham Alghamdi; Salem Belhaj; Mohammed Jalalah; Lyu-Guang Hua; Ghulam Hafeez; Safeer Ullah; Hisham Alghamdi; Salem Belhaj

doi:10.3934/math.2024688

AIMS Mathematics

2024, Volume 9, Issue 6: 14158-14185. doi: 10.3934/math.2024688

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

An application of heuristic optimization algorithm for demand response in smart grids with renewable energy

1.
Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Najran University, Najran 11001, Saudi Arabia
2.
Power China Hua Dong Engineering Corporation Limited, Hangzhou 311122, China
3.
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Mardan 23200, Pakistan
4.
Department of Electrical Engineering, Quaid-e-Azam College of Engineering & Technology, Sahiwal, 57000, Pakistan
5.
Computer Science Department, College of Science, Northern Border University, Arar 73222, Saudi Arabia

Received: 14 January 2024 Revised: 10 March 2024 Accepted: 22 March 2024 Published: 18 April 2024
MSC : 68T20

This work presented power usage scheduling by engaging consumers in demand response program (DRP) with and without using renewable energy generation (REG). This power usage scheduling problem was modeled as an optimization problem, which was solved using an energy scheduler (ES) based on the crossover mutated enhanced wind-driven optimization (CMEWDO) algorithm. The CMEWDO was an enhanced wind-driven optimization (WDO) algorithm, where the optimal solution returned from WDO was fed to crossover and mutation operations to further achieve the global optimal solution. The developed CMEWDO algorithm was verified by comparing it with other algorithms like the whale optimization algorithm (WOA), enhanced differential evolution algorithm (EDE), and the WDO algorithm in aspects of the electricity bill and peak to average demand ratio (PADR) minimization without compromising consumers' comfort. Also, the developed CMEWDO algorithm has a lower computational time (measured in seconds) and a faster convergence rate (measured in number of iterations) than the standard WDO algorithm and other comparative algorithms.

Keywords:

Citation: Mohammed Jalalah, Lyu-Guang Hua, Ghulam Hafeez, Safeer Ullah, Hisham Alghamdi, Salem Belhaj. An application of heuristic optimization algorithm for demand response in smart grids with renewable energy[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 14158-14185. doi: 10.3934/math.2024688

Related Papers:

[1]	Giuseppe Maria Coclite, Lorenzo di Ruvo . A singular limit problem for conservation laws related to the Kawahara-Korteweg-de Vries equation. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2016, 11(2): 281-300. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2016.11.281
[2]	Hyeontae Jo, Hwijae Son, Hyung Ju Hwang, Eun Heui Kim . Deep neural network approach to forward-inverse problems. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2020, 15(2): 247-259. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2020011
[3]	Anya Désilles, Hélène Frankowska . Explicit construction of solutions to the Burgers equation with discontinuous initial-boundary conditions. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2013, 8(3): 727-744. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2013.8.727
[4]	Tong Yan . The numerical solutions for the nonhomogeneous Burgers' equation with the generalized Hopf-Cole transformation. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2023, 18(1): 359-379. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2023014
[5]	Jinyi Sun, Weining Wang, Dandan Zhao . Global existence of 3D rotating magnetohydrodynamic equations arising from Earth's fluid core. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2025, 20(1): 35-51. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2025003
[6]	Guillermo Reyes, Juan-Luis Vázquez . The Cauchy problem for the inhomogeneous porous medium equation. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2006, 1(2): 337-351. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2006.1.337
[7]	Caihong Gu, Yanbin Tang . Global solution to the Cauchy problem of fractional drift diffusion system with power-law nonlinearity. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2023, 18(1): 109-139. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2023005
[8]	Bendong Lou . Self-similar solutions in a sector for a quasilinear parabolic equation. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2012, 7(4): 857-879. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2012.7.857
[9]	Yannick Holle, Michael Herty, Michael Westdickenberg . New coupling conditions for isentropic flow on networks. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2020, 15(4): 605-631. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2020016
[10]	Elisabeth Logak, Isabelle Passat . An epidemic model with nonlocal diffusion on networks. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2016, 11(4): 693-719. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2016014

Abstract

1. Introduction

The equation:

$\begin{equation} \begin{cases} \partial_t u + \partial_x f(u)-\beta^2 \partial_{x}^2 u+\delta \partial_{x}^3 u+\kappa u +\gamma^2\vert u\vert u = 0, &\quad 0 < t < T, \quad x\in \mathbb{R},\\ u(0,x) = u_0(x), &\quad x\in \mathbb{R}, \end{cases} \end{equation}$

(1.1)

was originally derived in ^[14,17] with $f(u) = au^2$ focusing on microbubbles coated by viscoelastic shells. These structures are crucial in ultrasound diagnosis using contrast agents, and the dynamics of individual coated bubbles are explored, taking into account nonlinear competition and dissipation factors such as dispersion, thermal effects, and drag force.

The coefficients $\beta^2$ , $\delta$ , $\kappa$ , and $\gamma^2$ are related to the dissipation, the dispersion, the thermal conduction dissipation, and to the drag force, repsctively.

If $\kappa = \gamma = 0$ , we obtain the Kudryashov-Sinelshchikov ^[18] Korteweg-de Vries-Burgers ^[3,20] equation

$\begin{equation} \partial_t u +a \partial_x u^2-\beta^2 \partial_{x}^2 u+\delta \partial_{x}^3 u = 0, \end{equation}$

(1.2)

that models pressure waves in liquids with gas bubbles, taking into account heat transfer and viscosity. The mathematical results on Eq (1.2) are the following:

● analysis of exact solutions in ^[13],

● existence of the traveling waves in ^[2],

● well-posedness and asymptotic behavior in ^[7,11].

If $\beta = 0$ , we derive the Korteweg-de Vries equation:

$\begin{equation} \partial_t u +a \partial_x u^2+\delta \partial_{x}^3 u = 0, \end{equation}$

(1.3)

which describes surface waves of small amplitude and long wavelength in shallow water. Here, $u(t, x)$ represents the wave height above a flat bottom, $x$ corresponds to the distance in the propagation direction, and $t$ denotes the elapsed time. In ^{[4,6,10,12,15,16]}, the completele integrability of Eq (1.3) and the existence of solitary wave solutions are proved.

Through the manuscript, we will assume

● on the coefficients

$\begin{equation} \beta,\,\delta,\,\kappa,\,\gamma\in \mathbb{R}, \quad \beta,\,\delta,\,\gamma\ne0; \end{equation}$

(1.4)

● on the flux $f$ , one of the following conditions:

$\begin{align} &f(u) = a u^2+bu^3, \end{align}$

(1.5)

$\begin{align} &f\in C^1( \mathbb{R}), \quad \vert f'(u)\vert\le C_0\left(1+\vert u\vert\right), \quad u\in \mathbb{R}, \end{align}$

(1.6)

for some positive constant $C_0$ ;

● on the initial value

$\begin{equation} u_0\in H^1( \mathbb{R}). \end{equation}$

(1.7)

The main result of this paper is the following theorem.

Theorem 1.1. Assume Eqs (1.5)–(1.7). For fixed $T > 0$ , there exists a unique distributional solution $u$ of Eq (1.1), such that

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} u \in&\, L^{\infty}(0,T;H^1( \mathbb{R}))\cap L^4(0,\,T;W^{1,\,4}( \mathbb{R}))\cap L^6(0,\,T;W^{1,\,6}( \mathbb{R}))\\ \partial_{x}^2 u\in&\, L^2((0,\,T)\times \mathbb{R}). \end{split} \end{equation}$

(1.8)

Moreover, if $u_1$ and $u_2$ are solutions to Eq (1.1) corresponding to the initial conditions $u_{1, 0}$ and $u_{2, 0}$ , respectively, it holds that:

$\begin{equation} \left\| {u_1(t,\cdot)-u_2(t,\cdot)} \right\|_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\le e^{C(T)t}\left\| {u_{1,0}-u_{2,0}} \right\|_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}, \end{equation}$

(1.9)

for some suitable $C(T) > 0$ , and every, $0\le t\le T$ .

Observe that Theorem 1.1 gives the well-posedness of (1.1), without conditions on the constants. Moreover, the proof of Theorem 1.1 is based on the Aubin-Lions Lemma ^[5,21]. The analysis of Eq (1.1) is more delicate than the one of Eq (1.2) due to the presence of the nonlinear sources and the very general assumptions on the coefficients.

The structure of the paper is outlined as follows. Section 2 is dedicated to establishing several a priori estimates for a vanishing viscosity approximation of Eq (1.1). These estimates are crucial for proving our main result, which is presented in Section 3.

2. Vanishing viscosity approximation

To establish existence, we utilize a vanishing viscosity approximation of equation (1.1), as discussed in ^[19]. Let $0 < \varepsilon < 1$ be a small parameter, and denote by $u_\varepsilon\in C^\infty([0, T)\times \mathbb{R})$ the unique classical solution to the following problem ^[1,9]:

$\begin{equation} \begin{cases} \partial_t u_\varepsilon + \partial_x f( u_\varepsilon)-\beta^2 \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon+\delta \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon+\kappa u\\ \qquad\quad +\gamma^2\vert u\vert u = - \varepsilon \partial_{x}^4 u_\varepsilon, &\quad 0 < t < T, \quad x\in \mathbb{R},\\ u_{ \varepsilon}(0,x) = u_{ \varepsilon,\,0}(x), &\quad x\in \mathbb{R}, \end{cases} \end{equation}$

(2.1)

where $u_{ \varepsilon, \, 0}$ is a $C^{\infty}$ approximation of $u_0$ , such that

$\begin{equation} \left\| {u_{ \varepsilon,\,0}} \right\|_{H^1( \mathbb{R})}\le \left\| {u_0} \right\|_{H^1( \mathbb{R})}. \end{equation}$

(2.2)

Let us prove some a priori estimates on $u_\varepsilon$ , denoting with $C_0$ constants which depend only on the initial data, and with $C(T)$ the constants which depend also on $T$ .

We begin by proving the following lemma:

Lemma 2.1. Let $T > 0$ be fixed. There exists a constant $C(T) > 0$ , which does not depend on $\varepsilon$ , such that

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}&+2\gamma^2e^{\vert\kappa\vert t}\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{t}\!\!\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}e^{-\vert\kappa\vert s} u_\varepsilon^2\vert u_\varepsilon\vert dsdx\\ &+2\beta^2e^{\vert\kappa\vert t}\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{t}e^{-\vert\kappa\vert s}\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(s,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})} ds\\ &+2 \varepsilon e^{\vert\kappa\vert t}\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{t}e^{-\vert\kappa\vert s}\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(s,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2(R)}\le C(T), \end{split} \end{equation}$

(2.3)

for every $0\le t\le T$ .

Proof. For $0\le t\le T$ . Multiplying equations (2.1) by $2 u_\varepsilon$ , and integrating over $\mathbb{R}$ yields

$\begin{align*} \frac{d}{dt}&\left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})} = 2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon \partial_t u_\varepsilon dx\\ = &\underbrace{-2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon f'( u_\varepsilon) \partial_x u_\varepsilon dx}_{ = 0}+2\beta^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dx-2\delta\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon dx \\ &-\kappa\left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}-2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon^2 dx-2 \varepsilon\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^4 u_\varepsilon dx \\ = &-2\beta^2\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+2\delta\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} \partial_x u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dx\\ &-\kappa\left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}-2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon^2 dx+2 \varepsilon\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} \partial_x u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon dx\\ = &-2\beta^2\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}-\kappa\left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &-2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon^2 dx-2 \varepsilon\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}. \end{align*}$

Thus, it follows that

$\begin{align*} \frac{d}{dt}\left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+&2\beta^2\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &+2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon^2 dx+2 \varepsilon\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ = &\kappa\left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\le \vert\kappa\vert \left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}. \end{align*}$

Therefore, applying the Gronwall's lemma and using Eq (2.2), we obtain

$\begin{align*} \left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}&+2\beta^2 e^{\vert\kappa\vert t}\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{t}e^{-\vert\kappa\vert s}\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(s,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}ds\\ &+ 2\gamma^2e^{\vert\kappa\vert t}\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^t\!\!\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}e^{-\vert\kappa\vert t}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon^2 dsdx+2 \varepsilon\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &+2 \varepsilon e^{\vert\kappa\vert t}\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{t}e^{-\vert\kappa\vert s} \left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(s,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}ds\\ \le& C_0e^{\vert\kappa\vert t}\le C(T), \end{align*}$

which gives Eq (2.3). □

Lemma 2.2. Fix $T > 0$ and assume (1.5). There exists a constant $C(T) > 0$ , independent of $\varepsilon$ , such that

$\begin{align} \left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}&\le C(T), \end{align}$

(2.4)

$\begin{align} \left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+\beta^2\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{t}\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(s,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}ds& \end{align}$

(2.5)

$\begin{align} +2 \varepsilon\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{t}\left\| { \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon(s,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}ds&\le C(T),\\ \displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{t}\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(s,\cdot)} \right\|^4_{L^4( \mathbb{R})} ds&\le C(T), \end{align}$

(2.6)

holds for every $0\le t\le T$ .

Proof. Let $0\le t\le T$ . Consider $A, \, B$ as two real constants, which will be specified later. Thanks to Eq (1.5), multiplying Eq (2.1) by

$\begin{equation*} -2 \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon+A u_\varepsilon^2+B u_\varepsilon^3, \end{equation*}$

we have that

$\begin{align} &\left(-2 \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon+A u_\varepsilon^2+B u_\varepsilon^3\right) \partial_t u_\varepsilon+ 2a\left(-2 \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon+A u_\varepsilon^2+B u_\varepsilon^3\right) u_\varepsilon \partial_x u_\varepsilon\\ &\qquad\quad+3b\left(-2 \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon+A u_\varepsilon^2+B u_\varepsilon^3\right) u_\varepsilon^2 \partial_x u_\varepsilon-\beta^2\left(-2 \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon+A u_\varepsilon^2+B u_\varepsilon^3\right) \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon \\ &\qquad\quad+\delta\left(-2 \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon+A u_\varepsilon^2+B u_\varepsilon^3\right) \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon+\kappa\left(-2 \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon+A u_\varepsilon^2+B u_\varepsilon^3\right) u_\varepsilon\\ &\qquad\quad+\gamma^2\left(-2 \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon+A u_\varepsilon^2+B u_\varepsilon^3\right)\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon = - \varepsilon\left(-2 \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon+A u_\varepsilon^2+B u_\varepsilon^3\right) \partial_{x}^4 u_\varepsilon. \end{align}$

(2.7)

Observe that

$\begin{align*} &\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\left(-2 \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon+A u_\varepsilon^2+B u_\varepsilon^3\right) \partial_t u_\varepsilon dx\\ &\qquad = \frac{d}{dt}\left(\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+\frac{A}{3}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^3dx +\frac{B}{4}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^4 dx\right),\\ &2a\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\left(-2 \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon+A u_\varepsilon^2+B u_\varepsilon^3\right) u_\varepsilon \partial_x u_\varepsilon dx = -4a\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon \partial_x u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dx,\\ &3b\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\left(-2 \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon+A u_\varepsilon^2+B u_\varepsilon^3\right) u_\varepsilon^2 \partial_x u_\varepsilon dx = -6b\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^2 \partial_x u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dx,\\ &{-\beta^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\left(-2 \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon+A u_\varepsilon^2+B u_\varepsilon^3\right) \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dx}\\ &\qquad = 2\beta^2\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+2A\beta^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^2 dx +3B\beta^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^2( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^2dx, \\ &\delta\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\left(-2 \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon+A u_\varepsilon^2+B u_\varepsilon^3\right) \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon dx = -2A\delta\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon \partial_x u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dx -3B\delta\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^2 \partial_x u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dx, \\ &\kappa\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\left(-2 \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon+A u_\varepsilon^2+B u_\varepsilon^3\right) u_\varepsilon dx\\ &\qquad = {2\kappa\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+{A\kappa}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^3 dx +{B\kappa}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^4 dx,}\\ &\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\left(-2 \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon+A u_\varepsilon^2+B u_\varepsilon^3\right)\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon dx\\ &\qquad = -2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dx +A\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u\vert u_\varepsilon^3dx +B\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u^4 dx,\\ &- \varepsilon\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\left(-2 \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon+A u_\varepsilon^2+B u_\varepsilon^3\right) \partial_{x}^4 u_\varepsilon dx\\ &\qquad = -2 \varepsilon\left\| { \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+2A \varepsilon\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon \partial_x u_\varepsilon{ \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon} dx+3B \varepsilon\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^2 \partial_x u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon dx\\ &\qquad = -2 \varepsilon\left\| { \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}-A \varepsilon\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^3 dx -6B \varepsilon\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^2 \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dx\\ &\qquad\quad -3B \varepsilon\left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot) \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad = -2 \varepsilon\left\| { \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}-A \varepsilon\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^3 dx +2B \varepsilon\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^4dx\\ &\qquad\quad -3B \varepsilon\left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot) \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}. \end{align*}$

Therefore, an integration on $\mathbb{R}$ gives

$\begin{align*} &\frac{d}{dt}\left(\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+\frac{A}{3}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^3dx +\frac{B}{4}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^4 dx\right)\\ &\qquad\quad +\beta^2\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+2 \varepsilon\left\| { \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad = -\left(4a+A\delta\right)\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon \partial_x u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dx -3\left(2b+B\delta\right)\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^2 \partial_x u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dx\\ &\qquad\quad -2A\beta^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^2 dx -3B\beta^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^2( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^2dx\\ &\qquad\quad -\kappa\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}-\frac{A\kappa}{3}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^3 dx -\frac{B\kappa}{4}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^4 dx\\ &\qquad\quad +2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dx {-A\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon^3dx-B\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon^4 dx}\\ &\qquad\quad -A \varepsilon\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^3 dx +2B \varepsilon\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^4dx-3B \varepsilon\left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot) \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}. \end{align*}$

Taking

$\begin{equation*} \left(A,\,B\right) = \left(-\frac{4a}{\delta},\,-\frac{2b}{\delta}\right), \end{equation*}$

we get

$\begin{align} &\frac{d}{dt}\left(\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}-\frac{4a}{3\delta}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^3dx -\frac{b}{\delta}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^4 dx\right)\\ &\qquad\quad +2\beta^2\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+2 \varepsilon\left\| { \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad = \frac{8a\beta^2}{\delta}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^2 dx +\frac{6b\beta^2}{\delta}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^2( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^2dx\\ &\qquad\quad -\kappa\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+\frac{4a\kappa}{3\delta}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^3 dx +\frac{b\kappa}{2}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^4 dx\\ &\qquad\quad +2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dx {+\frac{4a\gamma^2}{\delta}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon^3dx +\frac{2b\gamma^2}{\delta}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon^4 dx} \\ &\qquad\quad +\frac{4a \varepsilon}{\delta}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^3 dx-\frac{4b \varepsilon}{\delta}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^4dx+\frac{6b \varepsilon}{\delta}\left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot) \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}. \end{align}$

(2.8)

Since $0 < \varepsilon < 1$ , due to the Young inequality and (2.3),

$\begin{align*} &\frac{8a\beta^2}{\delta}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^2 dx\\ &\qquad\le 4\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^2( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^2 dx +\frac{4a^2\beta^4}{\delta^2}\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad\le 4\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+\frac{4a^2\beta^4}{\delta^2}\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad\le C_0\left(1+\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\right)\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})},\\ &\left\vert\frac{6b\beta^2}{\delta}\right\vert\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^2( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^2dx\le \left\vert\frac{6b\beta^2}{\delta}\right\vert\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})},\\ &\vert\frac{4a\kappa}{3\delta}\vert\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert^3 dx\le \left\vert\frac{4a\kappa}{3\delta}\right\vert\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad\le C(T)\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})},\\ &\left\vert\frac{b\kappa}{2}\right\vert\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^4 dx\le \left\vert\frac{b\kappa}{2}\right\vert\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad\le C(T)\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}, \\ &2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dx{\le}2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\left\vert\frac{\gamma^2\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon}{\beta}\right\vert\left\vert\beta \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon\right\vert dx\\ &\qquad\le\frac{\gamma^4}{\beta^2}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}{ u_\varepsilon}^4dx +\beta^2\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad \le\frac{\gamma^4}{\beta^2}\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0.T)\times \mathbb{R})}\left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})} +\beta^2\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad\le C(T)\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}+\beta^2\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})},\\ &\left\vert\frac{4a\gamma^2}{\delta}\right\vert\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert { u_\varepsilon}\vert \vert u_\varepsilon\vert^3dx = \left\vert\frac{4a\gamma^2}{\delta}\right\vert\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^4 dx\\ &\qquad\le \left\vert\frac{4a\gamma^2}{\delta}\right\vert\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})} \le C(T)\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}, \\ &\left\vert\frac{2b\gamma^2}{\delta}\right\vert\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert { u_\varepsilon}^4 dx\le \left\vert\frac{2b\gamma^2}{\delta}\right\vert\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^3_{L^{\infty}((0,\,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad\le C(T)\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^3_{L^{\infty}((0,\,T)\times \mathbb{R})},\\ &\left\vert\frac{4a \varepsilon}{\delta}\right\vert\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert \partial_x u_\varepsilon\vert^3 dx\le\left\vert\frac{4a \varepsilon}{\delta}\right\vert\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})} +\left\vert\frac{4a \varepsilon}{\delta}\right\vert\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^4 dx\\ &\qquad \le \left\vert\frac{4a}{\delta}\right\vert\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})} +\left\vert\frac{4a \varepsilon}{\delta}\right\vert\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^4 dx. \end{align*}$

It follows from Eq (2.8) that

$\begin{align} &\frac{d}{dt}\left(\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}-\frac{4a}{3\delta}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^3dx -\frac{b}{\delta}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^4 dx\right)\\ &\qquad\quad +\beta^2\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+2 \varepsilon\left\| { \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad\le C_0\left(1+\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\right)\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+C(T)\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad\quad +C(T)\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}+C(T)\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^3_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad\quad+C_0 \varepsilon\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^4 dx +C_0 \varepsilon\left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot) \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad\quad {+C_0\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}}. \end{align}$

(2.9)

[8, Lemma 2.3] says that

$\begin{equation} \displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^4 dx\le 9\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^2( \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon)^2 dx\le 9\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,\,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}. \end{equation}$

(2.10)

Moreover, we have that

$\begin{equation} \left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot) \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})} = \displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^2( \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon)^2 dx {\le}\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,\,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}. \end{equation}$

(2.11)

Consequentially, by Eqs (2.9)–(2.11), we have that

$\begin{align*} &\frac{d}{dt}\left(\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}-\frac{4a}{3\delta}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^3dx -\frac{b}{\delta}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^4 dx\right)\\ &\qquad\quad +\beta^2\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+2 \varepsilon\left\| { \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad\le C_0\left(1+\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\right)\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+C(T)\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad\quad +C(T)\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}+C(T)\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^3_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad\quad +C_0 \varepsilon\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,\,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})} {+C_0\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}.}\notag \end{align*}$

An integration on $(0, t)$ and Eqs (2.2) and (2.3) give

$\begin{align*} &\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}-\frac{4a}{3\delta}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^3dx -\frac{b}{\delta}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^4 dx\\ &\qquad\quad +\beta^2\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{t}\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(s,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}ds+2 \varepsilon\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{t}\left\| { \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon(s,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}ds\\ &\qquad\le C_0\left(1+\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\right)\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{t}\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(s,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}ds\\ &\qquad\quad+C(T)\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}t +C(T)\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}t+C(T)\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^3_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}t\\ &\qquad\quad +C_0 \varepsilon\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,\,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{t}\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(s,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}ds {+C_0\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{t}\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(s,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}ds}\\ &\qquad\le C(T)\left(1+\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})} +\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}+\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^3_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\right). \end{align*}$

Therefore, by Eq (2.3),

$\begin{align} &\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+\beta^2\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{t}\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(s,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}ds+2 \varepsilon\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{t}\left\| { \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon(s,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}ds\\ &\qquad\le C(T)\left(1+\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})} +\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}+\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^3_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\right)\\ &\qquad\quad +\frac{4a}{3\delta}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^3dx +\frac{b}{\delta}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^4 dx \\ &\qquad\le C(T)\left(1+\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})} +\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}+\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^3_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\right)\\ &\qquad\quad +\left\vert\frac{4a}{3\delta}\right\vert\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert^3dx +\left\vert\frac{b}{\delta}\right\vert\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^4 dx \\ &\qquad\le C(T)\left(1+\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})} +\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}+\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^3_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\right)\\ &\qquad\quad +\left\vert\frac{4a}{3\delta}\right\vert \left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\left\| { u_\varepsilon({t},\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})} +\left\vert\frac{b}{\delta}\right\vert\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad\le C(T)\left(1+\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})} +\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}+\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^3_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\right). \end{align}$

(2.12)

We prove Eq (2.4). Thanks to the Hölder inequality,

$\begin{equation*} u_\varepsilon^2(t,x) = 2\displaystyle {\int}_{-\infty}^{x} u_\varepsilon \partial_x u_\varepsilon dx\le 2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert\vert \partial_x u_\varepsilon\vert dx\le 2\left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}. \end{equation*}$

Hence, we have that

$\begin{equation} \left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^4_{L^{\infty}( \mathbb{R})}\le 4\left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}. \end{equation}$

(2.13)

Thanks to Eqs (2.3) and (2.12), we have that

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^4_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad\le C(T)\left(1+\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})} +\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}+\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^3_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\right). \end{split} \end{equation}$

(2.14)

Due to the Young inequality,

$\begin{align*} C(T)\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^3_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\le& \frac{1}{2}\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^4_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}+C(T)\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})},\\ C(T)\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\le& C(T)\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}+C(T). \end{align*}$

By Eq (2.14), we have that

$\begin{equation*} \frac{1}{2}\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^4_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}-C(T)\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}-C(T){\le0}, \end{equation*}$

which gives Eq (2.4).

Equation (2.5) follows from Eqs (2.4) and (2.12).

Finally, we prove Eq (2.6). We begin by observing that, from Eqs (2.4) and (2.10), we have

$\begin{equation*} \left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^4_{L^4( \mathbb{R})}\le C(T)\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}. \end{equation*}$

An integration on $(0, t)$ and Eqs (2.5) give Eq (2.6). □

Lemma 2.3. Fix $T > 0$ and assume (1.6). There exists a constant $C(T) > 0$ , independent of $\varepsilon$ , such that Eq (2.4) holds. Moreover, we have Eqs (2.5) and (2.6).

Proof. Let $0\le t\le T$ . Multiplying Eq (2.1) by $-2 \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon$ , an integration on $\mathbb{R}$ gives

$\begin{align*} \frac{d}{dt}&\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})} = -2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon \partial_t u_\varepsilon dx\\ = &-2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}f'( u_\varepsilon) \partial_x u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dx-2\beta^2\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})} -2\delta\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon dx\\ &-2\kappa\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dx-2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dx+2 \varepsilon\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^4 u_\varepsilon dx\\ = &-2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}f'( u_\varepsilon) \partial_x u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dx -2\beta^2\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &+2\kappa\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dx-2 \varepsilon\left\| { \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}. \end{align*}$

Therefore, we have that

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &\frac{d}{dt}\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+2\beta^2\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+2 \varepsilon\left\| { \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad = -2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}f'( u_\varepsilon) \partial_x u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dx+2\kappa\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dx. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(2.15)

Due Eqs (1.6) and (2.3) and the Young inequality,

$\begin{align*} &2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert f'( u_\varepsilon)\vert\vert \partial_x u_\varepsilon\vert\vert \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon\vert dx\le C_0\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert \partial_x u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon\vert dx+C_0\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon \partial_x u_\varepsilon\vert\vert \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon\vert dx\\ &\qquad = 2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\left\vert\frac{C_0\sqrt{3} \partial_x u_\varepsilon}{2\beta}\right\vert\left\vert\frac{\beta \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon}{\sqrt{3}}\right\vert dx+2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\left\vert\frac{C_0\sqrt{3} u_\varepsilon \partial_x u_\varepsilon}{2\beta}\right\vert\left\vert\sqrt{3}\beta \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon\right\vert dx\\ &\qquad\le C_0\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+C_0\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^2( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^2 dx +\frac{2\beta^2}{3}\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad\le C_0\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+C_0\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})} +\frac{2\beta^2}{3}\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad\le C_0\left(1+\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\right)\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})} +\frac{2\beta^2}{3}\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})},\\ &2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dx\le 2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^2\vert \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon\vert dx = 2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\left\vert\frac{\sqrt{3}\gamma^2 u_\varepsilon^2}{\beta}\right\vert\left\vert\frac{\beta \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon}{\sqrt{3}}\right\vert dx\\ &\qquad\le \frac{3\gamma^4}{\beta^2}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} u_\varepsilon^4 dx + \frac{\beta^2}{3}\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad\le\frac{3\gamma^4}{\beta^2}\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})} + \frac{\beta^2}{3}\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad\le C(T)\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}+\frac{\beta^2}{3}\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}. \end{align*}$

It follows from Eq (2.15) that

$\begin{align*} &\frac{d}{dt}\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+\beta^2\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+2 \varepsilon\left\| { \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ &\qquad\le C_0\left(1+\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\right)\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+C(T)\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}. \end{align*}$

Integrating on $(0, t)$ , by Eq (2.3), we have that

(2.16)

Thanks to Eqs (2.3), (2.13), and (2.16), we have that

$\begin{equation*} \left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^4_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\le C(T)\left(1+\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\right). \end{equation*}$

Therefore,

$\begin{equation*} \left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^4_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}-C(T)\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}-C(T)\le 0, \end{equation*}$

which gives (2.4).

Equation (2.5) follows from (2.4) and (2.16), while, arguing as in Lemma 2.2, we have Eq (2.6).

□

Lemma 2.4. Fix $T > 0$ . There exists a constant $C(T) > 0$ , independent of $\varepsilon$ , such that

$\begin{equation} \displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{t}\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(s,\cdot)} \right\|^6_{L^6( \mathbb{R})}ds\le C(T), \end{equation}$

(2.17)

for every $0\le t\le T$ .

Proof. Let $0\le t\le T$ . We begin by observing that,

$\begin{equation} \displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^6 dx\le \left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^4_{L^{\infty}( \mathbb{R})}\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}. \end{equation}$

(2.18)

Thanks to the Hölder inequality,

$\begin{align*} ( \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,x))^2 = &2\displaystyle {\int}_{-\infty}^{x} \partial_x u_\varepsilon \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon dy \le 2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert \partial_x u_\varepsilon\vert\vert \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon\vert dx\\ \le&2\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}. \end{align*}$

Hence,

$\begin{equation*} \left\| {u(t,\cdot)} \right\|^4_{L^{\infty}( \mathbb{R})}\le 4\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}. \end{equation*}$

It follows from Eq (2.18) that

$\begin{equation*} \displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^6 dx\le 4\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^4_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}. \end{equation*}$

Therefore, by Eq (2.5),

$\begin{equation*} \displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^6 dx\le C(T)\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}. \end{equation*}$

An integration on $(0, t)$ and Eq (2.5) gives (2.17). □

3. Proof of Theorem 1.1

This section is devoted to the proof of Theorem 1.1.

We begin by proving the following result.

Lemma 3.1. Fix $T > 0$ . Then,

$\begin{equation} {{the\ family\ }} \{ u_\varepsilon\}_{ \varepsilon > 0} {{ \ is\ compact\ in\ }} L^2_{loc}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R}) . \end{equation}$

(3.1)

Consequently, there exist a subsequence $\{ u_{\varepsilon_k} \}_{k\in \mathbb{N}}$ and $u\in L^2_{loc}((0, T)\times \mathbb{R})$ such that

$\begin{equation} u_{\varepsilon_k}\to u\ { in }\ L^2_{loc}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R}) {{\ and\ a.e.\ in\ }} (0,T)\times \mathbb{R} . \end{equation}$

(3.2)

Moreover, $u$ is a solution of Eq (1.1), satisfying Eq (1.8).

Proof. We begin by proving Eq (3.1). To prove Eq (3.1), we rely on the Aubin-Lions Lemma (see ^[5,21]). We recall that

$\begin{equation*} H^1_{loc}( \mathbb{R})\hookrightarrow\hookrightarrow L^2_{loc}( \mathbb{R})\hookrightarrow H^{-1}_{loc}( \mathbb{R}), \end{equation*}$

where the first inclusion is compact and the second one is continuous. Owing to the Aubin-Lions Lemma ^[21], to prove Eq (3.1), it suffices to show that

$\begin{align} & \{ u_\varepsilon\}_{ \varepsilon > 0} {\rm{\ is\ uniformly\ bounded\ in\ }} L^2(0,T;H^1_{loc}( \mathbb{R})) , \end{align}$

(3.3)

$\begin{align} & \{ \partial_t u_\varepsilon\}_{ \varepsilon > 0} {\rm{\ is\ uniformly\ bounded\ in\ }} L^2(0,T;H^{-1}_{loc}( \mathbb{R})) . \end{align}$

(3.4)

We prove Eq (3.3). Thanks to Lemmas 2.1–2.3,

$\begin{equation*} \left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{H^1( \mathbb{R})} = \left\| { u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\le C(T). \end{equation*}$

Therefore,

$\begin{equation*} \{ u_\varepsilon\}_{ \varepsilon > 0} {\rm{\ is\ uniformly\ bounded\ in }}\ L^{\infty}(0,T;H^{1}( \mathbb{R})) , \end{equation*}$

which gives Eq (3.3).

We prove Eq (3.4). Observe that, by Eq (2.1),

$\begin{equation*} \partial_t u_\varepsilon = - \partial_x\left( G( u_\varepsilon)\right)-f'( u_\varepsilon) \partial_x u_\varepsilon-\kappa u_\varepsilon -\gamma^2\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon, \end{equation*}$

where

$\begin{equation} G( u_\varepsilon) = \beta^2 \partial_x u_\varepsilon-\delta \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon- \varepsilon \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon. \end{equation}$

(3.5)

Since $0 < \varepsilon < 1$ , thanks to Eq (2.5), we have that

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} &{\beta^2\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^2((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}},\, \delta^2\left\| { \partial_{x}^2 u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^2((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\le C(T),\\ & \varepsilon^2\left\| { \partial_{x}^3 u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^2((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\le C(T). \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.6)

Therefore, by Eqs (3.5) and (3.6), we have that

$\begin{equation} \{ \partial_x\left(G( u_\varepsilon)\right)\}_{ \varepsilon > 0} \quad {\rm{\ is\ bounded\ in}}\ { L^2(0, T ; H^{-1}( \mathbb{R})) }. \end{equation}$

(3.7)

We claim that

$\begin{equation} \displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{T}\!\!\!\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}(f'( u_\varepsilon))^2( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^2 dtdx\le C(T). \end{equation}$

(3.8)

Thanks to Eqs (2.4) and (2.5),

$\begin{equation*} \displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{T}\!\!\!\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}(f'( u_\varepsilon))^2( \partial_x u_\varepsilon)^2 dtdx\le \left\| {f'} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}(-C(T),C(T))}\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{T}\left\| { \partial_x u_\varepsilon(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}dt\le C(T). \end{equation*}$

Moreover, thanks to Eq (2.3),

$\begin{equation} \vert\kappa\vert\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{T}\!\!\!\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}( u_\varepsilon)^2 dx \le C(T). \end{equation}$

(3.9)

We have that

$\begin{equation} \gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^T\!\!\!\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}(\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon)^2 dsdx\le C(T). \end{equation}$

(3.10)

In fact, thanks to Eqs (2.3) and (2.4),

$\begin{align*} \gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^T\!\!\!\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}(\vert u_\varepsilon\vert u_\varepsilon)^2 dsdx\le& \gamma^2\left\| { u_\varepsilon} \right\|^2_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^T\!\!\!\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}( u_\varepsilon)^2 dsdx\\ \le&C(T)\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^T\!\!\!\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}( u_\varepsilon)^2 dsdx\le C(T). \end{align*}$

Therefore, Eq (3.4) follows from Eqs (3.7)–(3.10).

Thanks to the Aubin-Lions Lemma, Eqs (3.1) and (3.2) hold.

Consequently, arguing as in [, Theorem 1.1], $u$ is solution of Eq (1.1) and, thanks to Lemmas 2.1–2.3 and Eqs (2.4), (1.8) holds. □

Proof of Theorem 1.1. Lemma 3.1 gives the existence of a solution of Eq (1.1).

We prove Eq (1.9). Let $u_1$ and $u_2$ be two solutions of Eq (1.1), which verify Eq (1.8), that is,

$\begin{align*} &\begin{cases} \partial_t u_i+ \partial_x f(u_i)-\beta^2 \partial_{x}^2 u_i+\delta \partial_{x}^3 u_i +\kappa u_i +\gamma^2\vert u_i\vert u_i = 0,&\quad 0 < t < T, \quad x\in \mathbb{R},\\ u_i(0,x) = u_{i,\,0}(x), &\quad x\in \mathbb{R}, \end{cases}\quad i = 1,2. \end{align*}$

Then, the function

$\begin{equation} \omega(t,x) = u_1(t,x)-u_2(t,x), \end{equation}$

(3.11)

is the solution of the following Cauchy problem:

$\begin{equation} \begin{cases} \partial_t\omega+ \partial_x\left( f(u_1)-f(u_2)\right)-\beta^2 \partial_{x}^2\omega+\delta \partial_{x}^2\omega \\ \qquad\qquad+\kappa\omega+\gamma^2\left(\vert u_1\vert u_1-\vert u_2\vert u_2\right) = 0, &\quad 0 < t < T, \quad x\in \mathbb{R},\\ \omega(0,x) = u_{1,\,0}(x)-u_{2,\,0}(x), &\quad x\in \mathbb{R}. \end{cases} \end{equation}$

(3.12)

Fixed $T > 0$ , since $u_1, \, u_2\in H^1(\mathbb{R})$ , for every $0\le t\le T$ , we have that

$\begin{equation} \left\| {u_1} \right\|_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})},\, \left\| {u_2} \right\|_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\le C(T). \end{equation}$

(3.13)

We define

$\begin{equation} g = \frac{f(u_1)-f(u_2)}{\omega} \end{equation}$

(3.14)

and observe that, by Eq (3.13), we have that

$\begin{equation} \vert g\vert\le \left\| {f'} \right\|_{L^{\infty}(-C(T),\,C(T))}\le C(T). \end{equation}$

(3.15)

Moreover, by Eq (3.11) we have that

$\begin{equation} \left\vert \vert u_1\vert-\vert u_2\vert\right\vert\le \vert u_1-u_2\vert = \vert\omega\vert. \end{equation}$

(3.16)

Observe that thanks to Eq (3.11),

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \vert u_1\vert u_1-\vert u_2\vert u_2 = &\vert u_1\vert u_1-\vert u_1\vert u_2 +\vert u_1\vert u_2 - \vert u_2\vert u_2\\ = &\vert u_1\vert\omega +u_2\left(\vert u_1\vert- \vert u_2\vert\right). \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.17)

Thanks to Eqs (3.14) and (3.17), Equation (3.12) is equivalent to the following one:

$\begin{equation} \partial_t\omega+ \partial_x ({g}\omega) -\beta^2 \partial_{x}^2\omega+\delta \partial_{x}^3\omega+\kappa\omega+\gamma^2\vert u_1\vert\omega+\gamma^2 u_2\left(\vert u_1\vert- \vert u_2\vert\right) = 0. \end{equation}$

(3.18)

Multiplying Eq (3.18) by $2\omega$ , an integration on $\mathbb{R}$ gives

$\begin{align*} \frac{dt}{dt}&\left\| {\omega(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})} = 2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\omega \partial_t\omega\\ = &-2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\omega \partial_x ({g}\omega)dx+2\beta^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\omega \partial_{x}^2\omega dx-2\delta\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\omega \partial_{x}^3\omega dx \\ &-2\kappa\left\| {\omega(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})} -2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_1\vert\omega^2 dx -2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}u_2\left(\vert u_1\vert- \vert u_2\vert\right)\omega dx\\ & = 2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}{g}\omega \partial_x\omega dx -2\beta^2\left\| { \partial_x\omega(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+2\delta\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}} \partial_x\omega \partial_{x}^2\omega dx\\ &-2\kappa\left\| {\omega(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})} -2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_1\vert\omega^2 dx -2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}u_2\left(\vert u_1\vert- \vert u_2\vert\right)\omega dx\\ = & 2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}{g}\omega \partial_x\omega dx -2\beta^2\left\| { \partial_x\omega(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}\\ & -2\kappa\left\| {\omega(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}-2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_1\vert\omega^2 dx -2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}u_2\left(\vert u_1\vert- \vert u_2\vert\right)\omega dx. \end{align*}$

Therefore, we have that

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \left\| {\omega(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}&+2\beta^2\left\| { \partial_x\omega(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_1\vert\omega^2 dx\\ = & 2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}{g}\omega \partial_x\omega dx -\kappa\left\| {\omega(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})} -2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}u_2\left(\vert u_1\vert- \vert u_2\vert\right)\omega dx. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.19)

Due to Eqs (3.13), (3.15) and (3.16) and the Young inequality,

$\begin{align*} &2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert {g}\vert\vert\omega\vert\vert \partial_x\omega\vert dx\le 2C(T)\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert\omega\vert\vert \partial_x\omega\vert dx\\ &\qquad = 2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\left\vert\frac{C(T)\omega}{\beta}\right\vert\left\vert\beta \partial_x\omega\right\vert dx\le C(T)\left\| {\omega(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})} +\beta^2\left\| { \partial_x\omega(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})},\\ &2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_2\vert\left\vert\left(\vert u_1\vert- \vert u_2\vert\right)\right\vert\vert\omega\vert dx\le 2\gamma^2\left\| {u_2} \right\|_{L^{\infty}((0,T)\times \mathbb{R})}\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\left\vert\left(\vert u_1\vert- \vert u_2\vert\right)\right\vert\vert\omega\vert dx\\ &\qquad\le C(T)\left\| {\omega(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}. \end{align*}$

It follows from Eq (3.19) that

$\begin{equation*} \left\| {\omega(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+\beta^2\left\| { \partial_x\omega(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}+2\gamma^2\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}\vert u_1\vert\omega^2 dx\le C(T)\left\| {\omega(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}. \end{equation*}$

The Gronwall Lemma and Eq (3.12) give

$\begin{equation} \begin{split} \left\| {\omega(t,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}&+\beta^2 e^{C(T)t}\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{t}e^{-C(T)s}\left\| { \partial_x\omega(s,\cdot)} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}ds\\ &+2\gamma^2 e^{C(T)t}\displaystyle {\int}_{0}^{t}\!\!\!\displaystyle {\int}_{ \mathbb{R}}e^{-C(T)s}\vert u_1\vert\omega^2 dsdx\le e^{C(T)t}\left\| {\omega_0} \right\|^2_{L^2( \mathbb{R})}. \end{split} \end{equation}$

(3.20)

Equation (1.9) follows from Eqs (3.11) and (3.20). □

Author contributions

Giuseppe Maria Coclite and Lorenzo Di Ruvo equally contributed to the methodologies, typesetting, and the development of the paper.

Use of AI tools declaration

The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

Acknowledgments

Giuseppe Maria Coclite is an editorial boardmember for [Networks and Heterogeneous Media] and was not involved inthe editorial review or the decision to publish this article.

GMC is member of the Gruppo Nazionale per l'Analisi Matematica, la Probabilità e le loro Applicazioni (GNAMPA) of the Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica (INdAM). GMC has been partially supported by the Project funded under the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), Mission 4 Component 2 Investment 1.4 -Call for tender No. 3138 of 16/12/2021 of Italian Ministry of University and Research funded by the European Union -NextGenerationEUoAward Number: CN000023, Concession Decree No. 1033 of 17/06/2022 adopted by the Italian Ministry of University and Research, CUP: D93C22000410001, Centro Nazionale per la Mobilità Sostenibile, the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research under the Programme Department of Excellence Legge 232/2016 (Grant No. CUP - D93C23000100001), and the Research Project of National Relevance "Evolution problems involving interacting scales" granted by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR Prin 2022, project code 2022M9BKBC, Grant No. CUP D53D23005880006). GMC expresses its gratitude to the HIAS - Hamburg Institute for Advanced Study for their warm hospitality.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.

References

[1]	M. Y. Raza, B. Lin, Analysis of Pakistan's electricity generation and CO $_2$ emissions: Based on decomposition and decoupling approach, J. Clean. Prod., 359 (2022), 132074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132074 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132074
[2]	A. Alzahrani, K. Sajjad, G. Hafeez, S. Murawwat, S. Khan, F. A. Khan, Real-time energy optimization and scheduling of buildings integrated with renewable microgrid, Appl. Energ., 335 (2023), 120640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120640 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120640
[3]	U. Assad, M. A. S. Hassan, U. Farooq, A. Kabir, M. Z. Khan, S. S. H. Bukhari, et al., demand response and optimization: A critical review of computational methods, Energies, 15 (2022), 2003. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15062003 doi: 10.3390/en15062003
[4]	G. Hafeez, N. Islam, A. Ali, S. Ahmad, M. Usman, K. S. Alimgeer, A modular framework for optimal load scheduling under price-based demand response scheme in smart grid, Processes, 7 (2019), 499. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7080499 doi: 10.3390/pr7080499
[5]	S. Nojavan, K. Zare, Demand response application in smart grid, Springer, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31399-9
[6]	A. Almutairi, N. Albagami, S. Almesned, O. Alrumayh, H. Malik, A novel optimal framework for scheduling rooftop solar home appliances considering electricity, real pricing and user comfort, Sol. Energy, 262 (2023), 111876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.111876 doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2023.111876
[7]	E. S. F. Tantawy, G. M. Amer, H. M. Fayez, Scheduling home appliances with integration of hybrid energy sources using intelligent algorithms, Ain Shams Eng. J., 13 (2022), 101676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.101676 doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2021.101676
[8]	M. A. Hossain, H. R. Pota, S. Squartini, F. Zaman, J. M. Guerrero, Energy scheduling of community microgrid with battery cost using particle swarm optimisation, Appl. Energ., 254 (2019), 113723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113723 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113723
[9]	I. Ullah, M. B. Rasheed, T. Alquthami, S. Tayyaba, A residential load scheduling with the integration of on-site PV and energy storage systems in micro-grid, Sustainability, 12 (2020), 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010184 doi: 10.3390/su12010184
[10]	I. Essiet, Y. Sun, Z. Wang, Scavenging differential evolution algorithm for smart grid demand side management, Procedia Manuf., 35 (2019), 595–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.05.084 doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.05.084
[11]	I. Essiet, Y. Sun, Z. Wang, Scavenging differential evolution algorithm for smart grid demand side management, Procedia Manuf., 35 (2019), 595–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.05.084 doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.05.084
[12]	F. R. Albogamy, S. A. Khan, G. Hafeez, S. Murawwat, S. Khan, S. I. Haider, et al., Real-time energy management and load scheduling with renewable energy integration in smart grid, Sustainability, 14 (2022), 1792. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031792 doi: 10.3390/su14031792
[13]	S. Leonori, M. Paschero, F. M. F. Mascioli, A. Rizzi, Optimization strategies for microgrid energy management systems by genetic algorithms, Appl. Soft Comput., 86 (2020), 105903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105903 doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105903
[14]	W. Chiu, J. Hsieh, C. Chen, Pareto optimal demand response based on energy costs and load factor in smart grid, IEEE T. Ind. Inform., 16 (2020), 1811–1822. https://doi.org/10.1109/TⅡ.2019.2928520 doi: 10.1109/TⅡ.2019.2928520
[15]	M. Gholami, M. J. Sanjari, Multiobjective energy management in battery-integrated home energy systems, Renew. Energ., 177 (2021), 967–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.162 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.162
[16]	X. Jiang, C. Xiao, Household energy demand management strategy based on operating power by genetic algorithm, IEEE Access, 7 (2019), 96414–96423. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2928374 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2928374
[17]	A. Mateen, M. Wasim, A. Ahad, T. Ashfaq, M. Iqbal, A. Ali, Smart energy management system for minimizing electricity cost and peak to average ratio in residential areas with hybrid genetic flower pollination algorithm, Alex. Eng. J., 77 (2023), 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.06.053 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2023.06.053
[18]	B. Mota, P. Faria, Z. Vale, Residential load shifting in demand response events for bill reduction using a genetic algorithm, Energy, 260 (2022), 124978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124978 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124978
[19]	R. Torkan, A. Ilinca, M. Ghorbanzadeh, A genetic algorithm optimization approach for smart energy management of microgrids, Renew. Energ., 197 (2022), 852–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.055 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.055
[20]	R. El Makroum, A. Khallaayoun, R. Lghoul, K. Mehta, W. Zörner, Home energy management system based on genetic algorithm for load scheduling: A case study based on real life consumption data, Energies, 16 (2023), 2698. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062698 doi: 10.3390/en16062698
[21]	S. Mandal, K. K. Mandal, Optimal energy management of microgrids under environmental constraints using chaos enhanced differential evolution, Renewable Energ. Focus, 34 (2020), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2020.05.002 doi: 10.1016/j.ref.2020.05.002
[22]	B. Chreim, M. Esseghir, L. Merghem-Boulahia, LOSISH—LOad scheduling in smart homes based on demand response: Application to smart grids, Appl. Energ., 323 (2022), 119606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119606 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119606
[23]	I. Ullah, I. Hussain, M. Singh, Exploiting grasshopper and cuckoo search bio-inspired optimization algorithms for industrial energy management system: Smart industries, Electronics, 9 (2020), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9010105 doi: 10.3390/electronics9010105
[24]	Y. Liu, H. Li, J. Zhu, Y. Lin, W. Lei, Multi-objective optimal scheduling of household appliances for demand side management using a hybrid heuristic algorithm, Energy, 262 (2023), 125460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125460 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125460
[25]	M. Waseem, Z. Lin, S. Liu, I. A. Sajjad, T. Aziz, Optimal GWCSO-based home appliances scheduling for demand response considering end-users comfort, Electr. Pow. Syst. Res., 187 (2020), 106477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106477 doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106477
[26]	R. K. Yadav, P. N. Hrisheekesha, V. S. Bhadoria, Grey wolf optimization based demand side management in solar pv integrated smart grid environment, IEEE Access, 11 (2023), 11827–11839. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3241856 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3241856
[27]	S. Mouassa, T. Bouktir, F. Jurado, Scheduling of smart home appliances for optimal energy management in smart grid using Harris-hawks optimization algorithm, Optim. Eng., 22 (2021), 1625–1652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-020-09572-1 doi: 10.1007/s11081-020-09572-1
[28]	G. Hafeez, Z. Wadud, I. U. Khan, I. Khan, Z. Shafiq, M. Usman, et al., Efficient energy management of IoT-enabled smart homes under price-based demand response program in smart grid, Sensors, 20 (2020), 3155. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113155 doi: 10.3390/s20113155
[29]	M. Jamil, S. Mittal, Hourly load shifting approach for demand side management in smart grid using grasshopper optimisation algorithm, IET Gener. Transm. Dis., 14 (2020), 808–815. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2019.0566 doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2019.0566
[30]	E. Shirazi, S. Jadid, Cost reduction and peak shaving through domestic load shifting and DERs, Energy, 124 (2017), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.148 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.148

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)