This study examines the impact of team-based learning (TBL) on students' performance in mechanics of materials, a fundamental yet challenging course in engineering curricula. Traditional lecture-based instruction has often failed to fully engage students and allow them to enhance their critical thinking skills that can be applied in engineering. This study compares outcomes between traditional lecture-based classrooms and those incorporating TBL at California State University, Fullerton (CSUF). Data from 72 students in traditional settings and 80 students in TBL-integrated classrooms were analyzed over multiple semesters. The results reveal improvement in examination scores and a reduction in failure rates for TBL participants compared with traditional instruction. The survey responses indicate that students in TBL sessions reported increased confidence, improved critical thinking, and enhanced teamwork skills. While the reduction in failure rates did not achieve statistical significance, the positive trends suggested that TBL effectively addresses challenges in high-stakes courses. The study advocates for expanding TBL to other fundamental engineering courses and institutions to further explore its effectiveness and potential to improve student retention, particularly among underrepresented minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).
Citation: Huda Munjy, Stephanie Botros, Rhonda Abouazra. Enhancing success in fundamental engineering courses: A case study on using team based learning to address high failure rates[J]. STEM Education, 2025, 5(1): 152-170. doi: 10.3934/steme.2025008
This study examines the impact of team-based learning (TBL) on students' performance in mechanics of materials, a fundamental yet challenging course in engineering curricula. Traditional lecture-based instruction has often failed to fully engage students and allow them to enhance their critical thinking skills that can be applied in engineering. This study compares outcomes between traditional lecture-based classrooms and those incorporating TBL at California State University, Fullerton (CSUF). Data from 72 students in traditional settings and 80 students in TBL-integrated classrooms were analyzed over multiple semesters. The results reveal improvement in examination scores and a reduction in failure rates for TBL participants compared with traditional instruction. The survey responses indicate that students in TBL sessions reported increased confidence, improved critical thinking, and enhanced teamwork skills. While the reduction in failure rates did not achieve statistical significance, the positive trends suggested that TBL effectively addresses challenges in high-stakes courses. The study advocates for expanding TBL to other fundamental engineering courses and institutions to further explore its effectiveness and potential to improve student retention, particularly among underrepresented minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).
| [1] | National Science Board, The Science and Engineering Workforce: Realizing America's Potential, 2003. |
| [2] | Augustine, N., Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP), National Academies Press, 2007. Retrieved from: https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/11463/rising-above-the-gathering-storm-energizing-and-employing-america-for |
| [3] | Cancado, L., Reisel, J. and Walker, C., Impacts of a summer bridge program in engineering on student retention and graduation. Journal of STEM Education, 2018, 19(2). |
| [4] | Yoon, S.Y., Imbrie, P.K., Reed, T. and Shryock, K.J., Identification of the engineering gateway subjects in the second-year engineering common curriculum. The International journal of engineering education, 2019, 35(1): 232‒251. |
| [5] |
Felder, R.M., STEM education: A tale of two paradigms. Journal of Food Science Education, 2021, 20(1): 8‒15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4329.12219 doi: 10.1111/1541-4329.12219
|
| [6] |
Kozanitis, A. and Nenciovici, L., Effect of active learning versus traditional lecturing on the learning achievement of college students in humanities and social sciences: A meta-analysis. Higher Education, 2023, 86(6): 1377‒1394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00977-8 doi: 10.1007/s10734-022-00977-8
|
| [7] | Tan, L., Wei, S. and Ohland, M., Work-in-Progress: Do International Peers Boost Team-Based Learning Effectiveness in Undergraduate Engineering Education? 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022. |
| [8] | Baligar, P., Joshi, G., Shettar, A. and Kandakatla, R., Penetration for Cooperative Learning in Engineering Education: A Systematic Literature Review. 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2022, 610‒619. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766551 |
| [9] | Martinez-Blanco, P. and Artano, K., COOPERATIVE LEARNING AS A TOOL TO WORK SOFT SKILLS IN ENGINEERING. EDULEARN24 Proceedings, 2024, 4759‒4768. IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2024.1172 |
| [10] |
Chen, J., Kolmos, A. and Du, X., Forms of implementation and challenges of PBL in engineering education: a review of literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2021, 46(1): 90‒115. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1718615 doi: 10.1080/03043797.2020.1718615
|
| [11] |
Gomez-del Rio, T. and Rodríguez, J., Design and assessment of a project-based learning in a laboratory for integrating knowledge and improving engineering design skills. Education for Chemical Engineers, 2022, 40: 17‒28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2022.04.002 doi: 10.1016/j.ece.2022.04.002
|
| [12] |
Randles, S., Dewick, P., Hannan, E., Nicholson, D.T., Rietbergen, M., Taylor, C., et al., Applying enquiry and problem based learning to mission-oriented innovation policy: from policy to pedagogy to teaching and learning practice. Journal of International Education in Business, 2022, 15(1): 52‒73. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-04-2021-0046 doi: 10.1108/JIEB-04-2021-0046
|
| [13] |
Silva, E.C.E., Lino-Neto, T., Ribeiro, E., Rocha, M. and Costa, M.J., Going virtual and going wide: comparing Team-Based Learning in-class versus online and across disciplines. Education and information technologies, 2022, 27(2): 2311‒2329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10683-0 doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10683-0
|
| [14] |
Roossien, L., Boerboom, T.B., Spaai, G.W. and de Vos, R., Team-based learning (TBL): Each phase matters! An empirical study to explore the importance of each phase of TBL. Medical teacher, 2022, 44(10): 1125‒1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2064736 doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2064736
|
| [15] |
Picard, C., Hardebolle, C., Tormey, R. and Schiffmann, J., Which professional skills do students learn in engineering team-based projects? European Journal of Engineering Education, 2022, 47(2): 314‒332. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1920890 doi: 10.1080/03043797.2021.1920890
|
| [16] |
Servant-Miklos, V., Problem-oriented project work and problem-based learning:" Mind the gap!". Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 2020, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl.v14i1.28596 doi: 10.14434/ijpbl.v14i1.28596
|
| [17] | Vargas, M., Nunez, T., Alfaro, M., Fuertes, G., Gutierrez, S., Ternero, R., et al., A project based learning approach for teaching artificial intelligence to undergraduate students. Int. J. Eng. Educ, 2020, 36(6): 1773‒1782. |
| [18] | Abdelkarim, A., Schween, D. and Ford, T.G., Advantages and disadvantages of problem-based learning from the professional perspective of medical and dental faculty. EC Dent Sci, 2018, 17(7): 1073‒1079. |
| [19] |
Burgess, A., Bleasel, J., Haq, I., Roberts, C., Garsia, R., Robertson, T., et al., Team-based learning (TBL) in the medical curriculum: better than PBL?. BMC medical education, 2017, 17: 1‒11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1068-z doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1068-z
|
| [20] | Michaelsen, L.K., Knight, A.B. and Fink, L.D., (Eds.), Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups in college teaching, Taylor & Francis, 2023. |
| [21] | Michaelsen, L.K., Parmelee, D.X., Levine, R.E. and McMahon, K.K., (Eds.), Team-based learning for health professions education: A guide to using small groups for improving learning. Taylor & Francis, 2023. |
| [22] | Esfahani, M.N. and Bhattacharya, S., Retention and Attrition in US STEM Education with the Help of Computer Technology and Curriculum Development. Valley International Journal Digital Library, 2023, 2806‒2814. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v11i06.el02 |
| [23] |
Qiu, R.G., A systemic approach to leveraging student engagement in collaborative learning to improve online engineering education. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 2019, 11(1): 1‒19. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2019.096734 doi: 10.1504/IJTEL.2019.096734
|
| [24] |
Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L. and McDonough, M., Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014,111(23): 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111
|
| [25] | Burke, C., Luu, R., Lai, A., Hsiao, V., Cheung, E., Tamashiro, D., et al., Making STEM Equitable: An Active Learning Approach to Closing the Achievement Gap. International Journal of Active Learning, 2020, 5(2): 71‒85. |
| [26] |
Owens, D.C., Sadler, T.D., Barlow, A.T. and Smith-Walters, C., Student Motivation from Resistance to Active Learning Rooted in Essential Science Practices. Research in Science Education, 2020, 50: 253‒277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9688-1 doi: 10.1007/s11165-017-9688-1
|
| [27] |
Ballen, C.J., Wieman, C., Salehi, S., Searle, J.B. and Zamudio, K.R., Enhancing Diversity in Undergraduate Science: Self-Efficay Drives Performance Gains with Active Learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 2017, 16(4): ar56. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-12-0344 doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-12-0344
|
| [28] | Dinis-Carvalho, J., Fernandes, S., Lima, R.M. and Costa-Lobo, C., Active learning in higher education: Developing projects in partnership with industry. INTED2017 Proceeding, 2017, 1695‒1704. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2017.0529 |
| [29] |
Cevik, A.A., ElZubeir, M., Abu-Zidan, F.M. and Shaban, S., Team-based learning improves knowledge and retention in an emergency medicine clerkship. International journal of emergency medicine, 2019, 12: 1‒8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-019-0222-2 doi: 10.1186/s12245-019-0222-2
|
| [30] |
Zhou, Y., Ji, S., Xu, T. and Wang, Z., Promoting knowledge construction: a model for using virtual reality interaction to enhance learning. Procedia computer science, 2018,130: 239‒246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.035 doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.035
|
| [31] |
Allen, R.E., Copeland, J., Franks, A.S., Karimi, R., McCollum, M., et al., Team-based learning in US colleges and schools of pharmacy. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2013, 77(6): 115. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe776115 doi: 10.5688/ajpe776115
|
| [32] |
Frame, T.R., Gryka, R., Kiersma, M.E., Todt, A.L., Cailor, S.M. and Chen, A.M., Student perceptions of and confidence in self-care course concepts using team-based learning. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2016, 80(3): 46. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe80346 doi: 10.5688/ajpe80346
|
Huda Munjy, Stephanie Botros, Rhonda Abouazra. Enhancing success in fundamental engineering courses: A case study on using team based learning to address high failure rates[J]. STEM Education, 2025, 5(1): 152-170. doi: 10.3934/steme.2025008
DownLoad: