STE(A)M education (combining science, technology, engineering, art, and mathematics) has globally become a growing concern, being recognized as having the potential to prepare students for the challenges of the 21st century. However, the levels of integration of the involved disciplines, as well as their relevance, tend to vary. Engineering design (ED) is being used in educational contexts as an ideal STEAM content integrator to solve ill-structured real-world problems, using the practices of engineering as a problem-solving model. The present study aimed to understand how future elementary school teachers can solve an authentic problem that demands the construction of an artifact, using the ED process in the context of 3D printing, focusing on their performance, the perception of the role of the STEAM disciplines, and the potentials and challenges of computer-assisted design (CAD) and 3D printing. We conducted a qualitative exploratory study with 72 pre-service teachers of elementary education. The implementation was based on a didactical experience focused on solving an authentic problem through the ED process using Tinkercad and 3D printing. The research findings revealed that some of the participants did not follow the ED model exactly as it was presented, skipping or merging steps, but all were able to find a solution and reflect about how to improve it. The majority identified concepts associated with all of the STEAM subjects, although they found it easier to refer to mathematics and science topics. They valued the use of Tinkercad and 3D printing, which allowed them to easily build a virtual model and make it tangible, while also recognizing some challenges in the use of these technological resources. This study can contribute to the scarce literature about the interdisciplinary integration of 3D printing technology in STEAM education, promoting awareness of the overlaps in these disciplines and a more equitable disciplinary attention.
Citation: Ana Barbosa, Isabel Vale, Dina Alvarenga. The use of Tinkercad and 3D printing in interdisciplinary STEAM education: A focus on engineering design[J]. STEM Education, 2024, 4(3): 222-246. doi: 10.3934/steme.2024014
STE(A)M education (combining science, technology, engineering, art, and mathematics) has globally become a growing concern, being recognized as having the potential to prepare students for the challenges of the 21st century. However, the levels of integration of the involved disciplines, as well as their relevance, tend to vary. Engineering design (ED) is being used in educational contexts as an ideal STEAM content integrator to solve ill-structured real-world problems, using the practices of engineering as a problem-solving model. The present study aimed to understand how future elementary school teachers can solve an authentic problem that demands the construction of an artifact, using the ED process in the context of 3D printing, focusing on their performance, the perception of the role of the STEAM disciplines, and the potentials and challenges of computer-assisted design (CAD) and 3D printing. We conducted a qualitative exploratory study with 72 pre-service teachers of elementary education. The implementation was based on a didactical experience focused on solving an authentic problem through the ED process using Tinkercad and 3D printing. The research findings revealed that some of the participants did not follow the ED model exactly as it was presented, skipping or merging steps, but all were able to find a solution and reflect about how to improve it. The majority identified concepts associated with all of the STEAM subjects, although they found it easier to refer to mathematics and science topics. They valued the use of Tinkercad and 3D printing, which allowed them to easily build a virtual model and make it tangible, while also recognizing some challenges in the use of these technological resources. This study can contribute to the scarce literature about the interdisciplinary integration of 3D printing technology in STEAM education, promoting awareness of the overlaps in these disciplines and a more equitable disciplinary attention.
[1] | New Vision for Education: Unlocking the Potential of Technology, Report from World Economic Forum, 2015. Available from: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEFUSA_NewVisionforEducation_Report2015.pdf |
[2] | English, L.D., STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 2016, 3(3): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1 doi: 10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1 |
[3] | Hester, K. and Cunningham, C., Engineering is Elementary: An Engineering and Technology Curriculum for Children. Proceedings of the ASSE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2007. |
[4] | Kaya, E., Deniz, H. and Yesilyurt, E., Engineering Encounters: Can't Pick It Up?. Science and Children, 2022, 60(1): 65-69. http://doi.org/10.1080/19434812.2022.12291824 doi: 10.1080/19434812.2022.12291824 |
[5] | Khurma, O., Ali, N. and Khine, M., Exploring the impact of 3D printing integration on STEM attitudes in elementary schools. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2023, 15(4): 458. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13568 doi: 10.30935/cedtech/13568 |
[6] | Trends Shaping Education 2022, Report from OECD, 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1787/6ae8771a-en |
[7] | Martins, G., Gomes, C., Brocardo, J., Pedroso, J., Carrillo, J., Silva, L. et al., Perfil dos Alunos à Saída da Escolaridade Obrigatória[Students' Profile at the end of Compulsory Schooling], 2017, ME/DGE. |
[8] | OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030, Report from OECD, 2019. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/learning-compass-2030/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_Concept_Note_Series.pdf |
[9] | Defining Education 4.0: A Taxonomy for the Future of Learning, Report from World Economic Forum, 2023. Available from: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Defining_Education_4.0_2023.pdf |
[10] | Edwards, S., Active learning in the middle grades. Middle School Journal, 2015, 46: 26–32. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1059827.pdf |
[11] | National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Principles to Actions - Ensuring Mathematical Success for All, 2014, NCTM. |
[12] | Chapman, O., Mathematics teachers' knowledge for teaching problem solving. LUMAT, 2015, 3(1): 19–36. https://doi.org/10.31129/lumat.v3i1.1049x doi: 10.31129/lumat.v3i1.1049x |
[13] | Vale, I. and Barbosa, A., Visualization: A Pathway to Mathematical Challenging Tasks. In R. Leikin (Ed.), Mathematical Challenges for All. Research in Mathematics Education, 2023,283-306, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18868-8_15 |
[14] | English, L.D., King, D.T. and Smeed, J., Advancing integrated STEM learning through engineering design: sixth-grade students' design and construction of earthquake resistant buildings. The Journal of Educational Research, 2017,110: 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1264053 doi: 10.1080/00220671.2016.1264053 |
[15] | Vale, I., Barbosa, A., Peixoto, A., and Fernandes, F., Solving Problems through Engineering Design: an exploratory study with pre-service teachers. Education Sciences, 2022, 12(12): 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120889 doi: 10.3390/educsci12120889 |
[16] | Dym, C.L., Agogino, A.M., Eris, O., Frey, D.D. and Leifer, L.J., Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 2005, 94: 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x |
[17] | Weng, X., Cui, Z., Ng, O.L., Jong, M. and Chiu, T., Characterizing Students' 4C Skills Development During Problem-based Digital Making. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2022, 31: 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09961-4 doi: 10.1007/s10956-022-09961-4 |
[18] | Gulikers, J.T.M., Bastiaens, J.T.M. and Martens, R.L., The surplus of an authentic learning environment. Computers and Human Behavior, 2005, 21: 509–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.028 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.028 |
[19] | Ng, S., Exploring STEM Competences for the 21st Century, 2019, IBE-UNESCO. |
[20] | Johnson, C.C., Conceptualizing integrated STEM education. School Science and Mathematics, 2013,113(8): 367–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12043 doi: 10.1111/ssm.12043 |
[21] | Land, M., Full STEAM Ahead: The Benefits of Integrating the Arts Into STEM. Procedia Computer Science, 2013, 20: 547-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.317 doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.317 |
[22] | Yackman, G., STEAM education: An overview of creating a model of integrative education. Pupils Attitudes toward Technology (PATT-19), Conference: Research on Technology, Innovation, Design & Engineering Teaching, 2008. |
[23] | Wynn, T. and Harris, J., Toward A Stem + Arts Curriculum: Creating the Teacher Team. Art Education, 2012, 65: 42-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2012.11519191 doi: 10.1080/00043125.2012.11519191 |
[24] | Martín-Páez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales-Palacios, F., and Vílchez-González, J., What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Science Education, 2019,103(4): 799-822. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21522 doi: 10.1002/sce.21522 |
[25] | Ortiz-Revilla, J., Greca, I.M. and Arriassecq, I.A., Theoretical Framework for Integrated STEM Education. Science & Education, 2022, 31: 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00242-x doi: 10.1007/s11191-021-00242-x |
[26] | Cunningham, C.M., Engineering in elementary STEM education: Curriculum design, instruction, learning, and assessment, 2018, Teacher College Press. |
[27] | Vasquez, J., Sneider, C. and Comer, M., STEM lesson essentials, grades 3–8: integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, 2013, Heinemann. |
[28] | National Academy of Engineering (NAE) and National Research Council (NRC), STEM integration in K-12 education: status, prospects, and an agenda for research, 2014, The National Academies Press. |
[29] | Kelley, T.R. and Knowles, J.G., A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 2016, 3: 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z doi: 10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z |
[30] | Grubbs, M. and Strimel, G., Engineering Design: The Great Integrator. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 2015, 50(1): 77-90. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/jste/vol50/iss1/8 |
[31] | Flavell, J.H., Miller, P.H. and Miller, S.A., Cognitive development, Prentice-Hall, 1993. |
[32] | English, L.D. and King, D.T., STEM learning through engineering design: fourth-grade students' investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education, 2015, 2(14): 1–18. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7 doi: 10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7 |
[33] | NGSS Lead States, Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states, 2013, National Academies Press. |
[34] | Sung, E. and Kelley, T.R., Elementary Students' Engineering Design Process: How Young Students Solve Engineering Problems. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2023, 21: 1615–1638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10317-y doi: 10.1007/s10763-022-10317-y |
[35] | Dasgupta, C., Magana, A. and Vieira, C., Investigating the affordances of a CAD enabled learning environment for promoting integrated STEM learning. Computers & Education, 2019,129: 122-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.014 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.014 |
[36] | Vale, I. and Barbosa, A., Movement & learning: The gallery walk strategy. In G.S. Carvalho and P. Palhares (Eds.), Improving Children's Learning and Well-Being, 2020, 7–22, UM-CIEC. |
[37] | Ng, O. and Chan, T., Learning as Making: Using 3D computer-aided design to enhance the learning of shape and space in STEM-integrated ways. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2018, 50(1): 294-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12643 doi: 10.1111/bjet.12643 |
[38] | Küçük, M., Talan, T. and Demirbilek, M., The Effect of Creating 3D Objects with Block Codes on Spatial and Computational Thinking Skills. Informatics in Education, 2024, 00: 125-143. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2024.02 doi: 10.15388/infedu.2024.02 |
[39] | Bowen, B., DeLuca, V. and Franzen, M., Measuring how the degree of content knowledge determines performance outcomes in an engineering design-based simulation environment for middle school students. Informatics in Education, 2016, 92-93: 117-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.005 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.005 |
[40] | Zhu, C., Klapwijk, R., Silva-Ordaz, M., Spandaw, J. and de Vries, M., Investigating the role of spatial thinking in children's design ideation through an open-ended design-by-analogy challenge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09877-7 doi: 10.1007/s10798-024-09877-7 |
[41] | Güleryüz, H., Attitudes of Pre-Service Teachers on the Use of 3D Printing with Tinkercad in Science Education. European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 2023, 4(4): 217–228. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmse.4.4.217 doi: 10.12973/ejmse.4.4.217 |
[42] | Cheng, L., Antonenko, P., Ritzhaupt, A., Dawson, K., Miller, D., MacFadden, B., et al., Exploring the influence of teachers' beliefs and 3D printing integrated STEM instruction on students' STEM motivation. Computers & Education, 2020,158: 103983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103983 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103983 |
[43] | Novak, E. and Wisdom, S., Using 3D Printing in Science for Elementary Teachers. In J. Mintzes and E. Walter (Eds.), Active Learning in College Science, 2020,729-739, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33600-4_45 |
[44] | Kostaki, V. and Papachristou, M., Commons-based peer production and digital fabrication: The case of a RepRap-based, Lego-built 3D printing-milling machine, Telematics and Informatics, 2014, 31(3): 434-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2013.09.006 |
[45] | Jablonski, S., Laufer, T. and Ludwig, M., Make it real: Students' mathematical modelling realized with 3D printing. In P. Drijvers, C. Csapodi, H. Palmér, K. Gosztonyi, K. and E. Kónya (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME13), 2023, 1211-1218, Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics and ERME. |
[46] | Bhaduri, S., Biddy, Q., Bush, J. and Suresh, A., 3DnST: A Framework Towards Understanding Children's Interaction with Tinkercad and Enhancing Spatial Thinking Skills. IDC '21: Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3459990.3460717 |
[47] | Ford, S. and Minshall, T., Where and how 3D printing is used in teaching and education. Additive Manufacturing, 2019, 25: 131-150. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.35360 doi: 10.17863/CAM.35360 |
[48] | Assante, D., Cennamo, G.M. and Placidi, L., 3D printing in education: An European perspective. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125311 doi: 10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125311 |
[49] | Evans, E. and McComb, C., The problem with printing pitch: challenges in designing 3D printed claves, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2022, 29(1): 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-01-2022-0028 |
[50] | Erickson, F., Qualitative Methods in Research on Teaching. In M. Wittrockk (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, 1986,119–161, MacMillan. |
[51] | Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications, 2003. |
[52] | Patton, M.Q., Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, Sage Publications, 2015. |
[53] | Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M., Qualitative Data Analysis, Sage Publications, 1994. |
[54] | Martin-Erro, A., Somonte, M. and Escudero, M., The role of sketching in engineering design and its presence on engineering education. In INTED2016 Proceedings, 2016, 3465-3471, IATED. http://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2016.1822 |