Review

A compendium of single cell analysis in aging and disease

  • Received: 14 August 2019 Accepted: 25 March 2020 Published: 27 March 2020
  • Cell is the fundamental structural and functional unit of complex multicellular organisms. Conventional methods which involve average analysis of cells in bulk populations can undermine physiologically significant cell populations, whereas analysis of cells at a single cell level may reveal unique biomarkers and other mechanisms that govern the genotype and phenotype in various physiological processes in presumed homogenous cell populations. Cellular abnormalities such as irregularities in cellular mechanisms have been linked to human aging and other major diseases including neurodegenerative, vascular, autoimmune, and cancer. Aging is a functional decline associated with various diseases in an organism, majorly arising from cellular abnormalities. Single cell analysis (SCA) which involves isolation and study of single cell proteomics, genomics, transcriptomics and metabolomics which enables research of cellular abnormalities with a molecular resolution, is gaining recognition in the research of human aging and disease. The advances in SCA are producing breakthrough information about cellular heterogeneity, disease progression, cellular microenvironment and its interactions, early diagnostics, improving precision medicine through high throughput drug screening and discovery of novel biomarkers; combinedly, these advances exhibit the potential of SCA to study of human aging and disease. Primarily, we review the role of SCA in understanding cellular mechanisms involved in aging and other major diseases including neurological, vascular, autoimmunity and cancer. Secondly, we also include review of SCA role in studying cell adhesion mechanisms which are involved in tissue development and maintenance and disease progression. Finally, SCA potential to empower precision medicine and its overall challenges along with future directions are discussed.

    Citation: Uday Chintapula, Samir M Iqbal, Young-Tae Kim. A compendium of single cell analysis in aging and disease[J]. AIMS Molecular Science, 2020, 7(1): 49-69. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2020004

    Related Papers:

    [1] Dora Brites . Cell ageing: a flourishing field for neurodegenerative diseases. AIMS Molecular Science, 2015, 2(3): 225-258. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2015.3.225
    [2] Brandt D. Pence . Recent developments and future perspectives in aging and macrophage immunometabolism. AIMS Molecular Science, 2021, 8(3): 193-201. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2021015
    [3] Fumiaki Uchiumi, Akira Sato, Masashi Asai, Sei-ichi Tanuma . An NAD+ dependent/sensitive transcription system: Toward a novel anti-cancer therapy. AIMS Molecular Science, 2020, 7(1): 12-28. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2020002
    [4] Patrizia A d'Alessio, Marie C Béné, Chantal Menut . d-Limonene challenging anti-inflammatory strategies. AIMS Molecular Science, 2022, 9(2): 46-65. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2022003
    [5] Jade Sternberg, Miriam Wankell, V. Nathan Subramaniam, Lionel W. Hebbard . The functional roles of T-cadherin in mammalian biology. AIMS Molecular Science, 2017, 4(1): 62-81. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.1.62
    [6] Akshaj Pole, Manjari Dimri, Goberdhan P. Dimri . Oxidative stress, cellular senescence and ageing. AIMS Molecular Science, 2016, 3(3): 300-324. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2016.3.300
    [7] Khushboo Desai, Dolly Patel, Parth Desai, Rakesh Rawal, Himanshu Pandya . Periostin – an unexplored tumor marker of oral squamous cell carcinoma. AIMS Molecular Science, 2020, 7(4): 383-395. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2020019
    [8] Ana Jalles, Patrícia Maciel . The disruption of proteostasis in neurodegenerative disorders. AIMS Molecular Science, 2015, 2(3): 259-293. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2015.3.259
    [9] Ashok Chakraborty, Anil Diwan . Molecular mechanisms of neurodegenerative disease (NDD). AIMS Molecular Science, 2023, 10(3): 171-185. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2023012
    [10] Hannah P. Priyanka, Rahul S. Nair, Sanjana Kumaraguru, Kirtikesav Saravanaraj, Vasantharekha Ramasamy . Insights on neuroendocrine regulation of immune mediators in female reproductive aging and cancer. AIMS Molecular Science, 2021, 8(2): 127-148. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2021010
  • Cell is the fundamental structural and functional unit of complex multicellular organisms. Conventional methods which involve average analysis of cells in bulk populations can undermine physiologically significant cell populations, whereas analysis of cells at a single cell level may reveal unique biomarkers and other mechanisms that govern the genotype and phenotype in various physiological processes in presumed homogenous cell populations. Cellular abnormalities such as irregularities in cellular mechanisms have been linked to human aging and other major diseases including neurodegenerative, vascular, autoimmune, and cancer. Aging is a functional decline associated with various diseases in an organism, majorly arising from cellular abnormalities. Single cell analysis (SCA) which involves isolation and study of single cell proteomics, genomics, transcriptomics and metabolomics which enables research of cellular abnormalities with a molecular resolution, is gaining recognition in the research of human aging and disease. The advances in SCA are producing breakthrough information about cellular heterogeneity, disease progression, cellular microenvironment and its interactions, early diagnostics, improving precision medicine through high throughput drug screening and discovery of novel biomarkers; combinedly, these advances exhibit the potential of SCA to study of human aging and disease. Primarily, we review the role of SCA in understanding cellular mechanisms involved in aging and other major diseases including neurological, vascular, autoimmunity and cancer. Secondly, we also include review of SCA role in studying cell adhesion mechanisms which are involved in tissue development and maintenance and disease progression. Finally, SCA potential to empower precision medicine and its overall challenges along with future directions are discussed.


    All Multicellular Organisms are built on basic units called “cell”, a fundamental unit of structure, function, and organization. Understanding cells and interactions with its microenvironment can help gain insights into the development and progression of a disease, the effects of human aging, and cellular differentiation. SCA is the study of individual cells isolated from various tissues and analyzed for their “Omics” profiles including genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics. The conventional techniques such as western blot, mass spectrometry and sequence profiling of cells for detection of biomarkers, drug treatment outcomes and other pathologically significant molecule investigation, use the average readouts of bulk cell populations which mask the underlying heterogeneity and microenvironments of the cells. Unlike conventional techniques, SCA techniques including Atomic force microscopy, Microfluidic studies, Single cell RNA-sequence (ScRNA-seq), etc., can investigate the events occurring at a single cell level and improve recording events of individual gene expression profiles, cellular heterogeneities and other cellular activities previously unknown [1]. The small size of the cells and low amounts of analytes from cellular processes still pose great challenges in recording those events, presenting the scope for development in SCA techniques.

    Figure 1.  Single cell analysis overview.

    Cell undergoes complex processes of migration, mitosis, exocytosis and endocytosis of various molecules throughout its lifespan and, during these processes there are many events occurring in the cellular environment to maintain homeostasis. Research indicates that primitive life of the cell was formed in a symbiotic relationship with mitochondria, previously belived to be a separate living entity, was recently found as cell-free entity in blood which may be involved in cell-to-cell communications and other unexplored viral fragments such as retrotransposons fused into human genome; together, these features exhibit the high complexity involved in cellular mechanisms [2][8]. These complex cell systems undergo transitions from one physiological state to another during differentiation and maturation based on their interactions with its micro-environments, commonly referred to as “Cellular plasticity”. SCA has shown to be a valuable tool in characterizing the cellular plasticity. For instance, Mitra Mjtahedi et al. have shown a theory based approach to finding the tipping point of when a multipotent progenitor cell will differentiate into myeloid and erythroid cells using single cell profiling [9]. Also, SCA has shown a rather unique cell-division independent heterogeneity in phenotypic hematopoietic stem cells, revealing a new perspective on differentiation without cytokinesis; which could be further modeled as a parameter to study any such occurrences in other pathologically significant cell populations such as cancer cells [10]. Similarly, SCA techniques such as Drop-Seq, in situ barcoding, Lab-on-a-chip, single-cell RNA sequencing techniques like Smart-Seq2, laser capture microdissection, etc., have the potential to study complex functions in cellular populations with single-cell resolution to uncover novel cellular features including cell phenotypes, biomarkers, differentiation profiles and therapeutically significant sub populations, which are specially advantageous over conventional cell profiling techniques by excluding contaminating cells and considering rare cell populations [11][13]. Cellular plasticity aids in organ formation during embryogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), intermediate hybrid states, etc., where cell must make “fate decisions” majorly depending on its environmental factors including pH, redox elements, antigen presentation cytokine gradients, epigenetic modifications, etc., and dynamics between those factors and fate decisions are still largely unknown [14][16]. Fate decisions including upregulation of surface marker expressions, phenotype changes, epigenetic modifications, adhesion, etc., are linked with many dynamic processes in embryo development, cell division and differentiation, cell migration, intercellular communication via exosomes and other physiological activities. When these dynamic processes are out of a control or enter a deregulated state, they trigger the onset of aging and disease progression. SCA techniques have emerged to be an important tool in illuminating these processes occurring at a single cell level and help us understand these irregularities in cellular mechanisms [1]. Ping Hu et al. have reviewed most of the single cell isolation techniques [17] and Lucas Armbrecht et al. have detailed various contemporary single cell analysis tools and techniques [18]. This review will be a compendium of SCA with a focus on its role in understanding aging and other major diseases including neurological, vascular, autoimmune and cancer. A brief workflow of SCA from isolation of single cells, its analysis and potential outcomes is given in Table 1.

    Table 1.  Workflow of Single cell analysis.
    1. Isolation of single cells 2. Single Cell Analysis 3. Outcome
    • Pipetting [19]
    • Fluorescence, magnetic activated cell sorting (FACS & MACS) [20]
    • Laser capture microdissection (LCM) [21]
    • Microfluidics isolation [22]
    • Surface based cell adhesion [23],[24]
    • Raman optical tweezers (ROT) [25]
    • SORT-seq [26]
    • Microhip platform for single cell exosomal vesical profiling [27]
    • Microfluidic based wells, traps and patterns [24],[28]
    • Optical methods: live cell imaging (SCOPE-Seq [29]), fluorescence techniques [30] ELISAs
    • Acoustofluidic sensing [31][33]
    • Electrochemical analysis [34][36]
    • Mass Spectrometry [37][41] PCR based methods [42]
    • Atomic force microscopy [43],[44]
    • Nanomotors [45],[46]
    • Raman spectroscopy [47],[48]
    • Fluorescent in situ Hybridization (FISH) [49][51]
    • PNA-FISH [52]
    • Single cell RNA sequencing (ScRNA-seq)
    • Div-seq [53]
    • Probe Cellular heterogeneity [54],[55] and Cellular functionality [56]
    • Track Cell lineage [57],[58]
    • Cell-substrate response [59][61]
    • Cellular level drug response [62],[63]
    • Invaluable tool in human atlas project.
    • Aid in Anti-Microbial research [60],[64]
    • Identify novel drug targets [65]

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Cells are functionally and structurally regulated to perform specific tasks and maintain functionality in tissues, e.g., hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) ability of differentiation into various blood cells and immune cells to maintain homeostasis among organs, neural stem cells (NSC) in generating new neurons for various brain functions including learning, memory, etc. Similarly, cells of other body systems have their own functions which are tightly regulated to maintain tissue homeostasis and cell behavior changes with age reflecting on the structure and functionality of a multi-cellular organism, typically ensuing detrimental effects. Cells survive constantly by repressing apoptosis—a physiological form of cell apoptosis via intercellular signaling and self-destruct when they are damaged and unusual to the system, by triggering apoptosis [66]. When the regulatory mechanisms governing the innate functioning of cells are compromised and beyond repair due to various factors including oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction, the onset of senescence triggers, which comprises of irreversible arrest of cell cycle avoiding division and apoptosis, acquiring DNA damage such as telomere shortening, epigenetic modifications and morphological changes. These physiological changes in cell impart chronic inflammation and disrupt tissue homeostasis leading to reduced organ functionality and disease, mostly seen in human aging. Isolation and study of senescent cells and damaged progenitor cells like HSC and NSC to identify significant biomarkers with molecular resolution is critical to address various pathophysiological health issues which develop with age. Telomere which protects the ends of chromosome is shortened after numerous cell division cycles reducing cell's proliferative abilities and eventually acquire senesce, telomerase reverse component (TERT) which is critical in telomerase repair, has very low expression inside a cell, making it difficult to study with conventional bulk cell analysis. Ravindranathan et al. have developed single-molecule techniques in combination of RNA scope coupled PNA FISH detection of TERT based addition of telomere units onto chromosomes in single cells; which creates a platform to study effects of age related drugs on senescent cells [52].

    SCA techniques like single-cell RNA-seq have been crucial in identifying varied functional states of single cells in presumed homogenous functional state in bulk cell populations. HSC, especially long-term reconstituting HSC (LT-HSC) which are the most primitive pool of stem cells with potential to differentiate into various blood cell types and also an important indicator of regenerative potential is normally seen to decline with age. SMART-seq study of comparative analysis of LT-HSCs single cells of young and old mice probed for their cellular state changes found old LT-HSCs to spend less time in the G1 phase cell cycle when compared to young HSCs along with reduced cell cycle-related component expression in old HSC contrary to the expression observed at bulk population level, which is corelated to lower rate of differentiation and higher accumulation of old LT-HSC with possible detrimental effects on tissue homeostasis [67]. Morita et al. used single-cell culture and transplantation assay to study hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) differentiation potential in primary and secondary recipient mice (HSC transplanted from primary mice); where a higher number of HSC with CD150 marker associated with differentiation potential of HSC into erythroblast/megakaryocyte were seen in secondary recipients with a shift towards lymphoid nature than in primary recipients, showing an underlying hierarchy and complexity in reconstitution capability of HSC [55]. Similar to blood cells generated from HSC, adult neurons are generated from NSC to maintain tissue homeostasis in various brain regions helping in learning, memory and repair [68]. Single-cell RNA-seq of NSC cells isolated using Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) and Immunostaining, studied in young and old mice revealed the increased infiltration and clonal expansion of CD8+ CD4 T cells in old mice as well as human NSC niche than the younger ones and interferons secreted by those infiltrated T cells showed inhibitory effects on NSC subtypes in old mice revealing possible clues related to age-associated cognitive impairment due to impaired NSC populations [69]. Also, recent single cell transcriptome profiling using single cell RNA-seq technique study with a focus on ribosome biogenesis pathway in different neuronal cell types argue that aging process may be more varied and gradual than an identical molecular program shared across cell types, which shows the advantages of SCA in probing cellular landscape versus the conventional analysis in bulk population of cells [70]. SCA studies which used miRNA Microarray Affymetrix chips in analyzing miRNA species from hypothalamic Neuronal Stem cells (htNSC) in cerebrospinal fluid of mouse models showed age-associated reduction in htNSCs, and the introduction of genetically engineered hypothalamic stem/progenitor cells which survive in an inflammatory environment of aging have achieved noteworthy aging retardation and lifespan extension in mice, suggesting that htNSCc cells in part control brain aging speed through exosomal miRNAs [71]. Lab on a Chip device such as neuro-optical microfluidic platform reported by Kim YT et al. demonstrate the ability to isolate and analyze neuronal activities including degeneration, regrowth and functional activities which can help understand the changing physiological activity and detrimental effects of aging at a single-cell level [72].

    Figure 2.  SCA role in aging studies.

    Somatic genomic variations referred to as chromosomic instability have shown to play a key role in effecting human neuronal diversity and brain related diseases [73] with intercellular epigenomic variations such as in histone acetylation and DNA methylation which alter and mediate gene expressions in neurons of central nervous system leading to various effects on aging brain and development of neurodegenerative disorders [74],[75]. SCA methods like Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), immune-FISH, Spectral Karyotyping (SKY), genome microarrays, and other single cell genome and molecular staining techniques can help uncover somatic variations and its effects linked to brain aging [75],[76]. A combination of SCA techniques; single nucleus RNA-Seq (Smart-Seq) and Div-Seq are being employed to identify and profile newborn neurons in the adult brain and spinal cord while also track their transcriptional dynamics [53],[54]. These latest SCA techniques can give a boost to the quest in finding molecular mechanisms [77], major pathways [70], morphological changes and epigenetic modifications [78] that contribute to the aging processes in brain. Studying the characteristics of these regenerative and their related senescent cell populations with single cell resolution can help model drug targets to understand aging process.

    Major studies to understand pathological diseases at cellular level includes examination of proteostasis, intracellular signaling through proteins, RNA metabolism changes, energy metabolism, the influence of microenvironments on stem cells and diseased cells, variations in stem cell differentiation, cellular cytokine profiles, etc. [79], which propels development of molecular therapeutics. Due to the complexity of the disease etiology, such as the genetics and environmental factors which influence various downstream molecular mechanisms across the cell, multi omics study such as SCA can be highly beneficial to provide meaningful insight into the disease and to tailor precision medicine. Hasin et al. have discussed in detail on design considerations of multi omics studies and its data integration of various techniques to investigate information flow in a disease [80]. Along with single cell sequencing techniques, new-generation mass spectrometry techniques such as Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FTICR) [37],[38], time-of-flight mass analyzers [39],[40], nano-flow electrospray ionization (nanoESI), etc. [41],[81] provide insights in understanding functionally important proteins, peptides and metabolites generated from differential gene expressions of pathologically significant cell populations. Role of SCA in neurodegenerative diseases, vascular, autoimmune, and cancer will be discussed in this section.

    Neurological diseases and neurological disorders are linked to abnormalities of cells associated with brain. Various global initiatives like Human Brain Project, China Brain Project, BRAIN initiative, Japan's Brain Mapping by integrated Neurotechnology's for disease studies, etc. are employing SCA techniques to understand the genotype and phenotype of various known and seemingly unknown cell types. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing methods with iterative clustering and classification of single-neuron data are deployed in categorizing and comparing single nuclear transcriptomes to reveal unknown neuronal cell subtypes in human brain [82]. DNA analysis of post-mortem brain samples of schizophrenia patients with multicolor FISH technique detected chromosomal aneuploidy and trisomy compared to diploid in normal patients revealing neurological disorder markers in cells which are hard to acquire from whole tissue samples [50]. A hypothetical model of GIN'n'CIN (genomic instability and chromosome instability) suggests neural aneuploidy produced in early brain development can lead to various genomic variation related diseases including Alzheimer's disease [76]. Gene expression analysis revealed pathogenic alterations in common transcripts such as glutamatergic neurotransmission, synaptic-related markers, protein phosphatases and kinases and neurotrophin receptors, in vulnerable brain cell types of Alzheimer's diseases [83]. Single cell profiling of dopaminergic neurons has identified genetic modifiers in Parkinson's disease patients in a genome-wide expression studies combined with association analysis of different patient samples showing the potential of SCA to assess genetic risk factors in neurodegenerative disorders [84]. Human brain transcriptome diversity study on fetal and adult neurons of human cortical neurons has discovered a subset of adult neurons which express major histocompatibility complex class I genes which makes them exposed to various immune responses unlike fetal neurons [85]. James Eberwine et al. report of a system where they have successfully cultured brain cells with its original robustness and performed single cell transcriptomics on 300 individual single cells to study their single cell transcriptomics and were able to identify brain cell types of oligodendrocytes, microglia, neurons, endothelial cells and astrocytes based on cell marker expressions and morphology [54]. Systems like these can be used to understand characteristics of cell types in normal and diseased brains, which can help illuminate the plasticity and underlying pathologically significant biomarkers. Microfluidic compartmentalization technology developed by Ayaka Yamada et al. included construction of controlled 3D microenvironments to culture brain cell types like neurons and glial cells which can be analyzed for drug responses and other pathophysiological activities in natural environments unlike conventional in vitro cultures which does not truly mimic 3D in vivo microenvironment [86].

    Vascular related disease is very high in age-related deaths where vascular wound healing impairment due to lack of neovascularization and atherosclerosis plaque formations in vasculature presumably caused by inflammation are quite prominent. SCA of progenitor cells such as HSC, endothelial progenitor cells involved in regeneration, repair and other inflammatory microenvironment can help improve the understanding in vascular diseases and reveal novel molecular markers which can be targeted for therapeutic purposes. Single-cell expression profiling in atherosclerotic and inflammatory significant vascular cells of smooth muscle cell (SMC) and endothelial cell subpopulations has revealed heterogeneity in G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) expression patterns in specific cell subtypes compared to conventional expressional systems where RNA/cDNA is pooled from bulk populations disabling identification of novel subpopulations. SCA techniques like mass cytometry (CyTOF) in combination with clustering algorithms have detected various immune cell populations and low frequencies of atheroprotective B1 cell subsets with no spectral overlap unlike FACS in contrast with dominant B-cell content detected by flow cytometry from whole atherosclerotic aortas of mice [87],[88]. LCM techniques can be employed to dissect desired phenotype of cells, e.g., macrophage rich areas of atherosclerotic plaques, which can be further analyzed by ScRNA-Seq in identifying new immune cell subsets and their functions in atherosclerotic progression. Finding various molecular pathways and other therapeutic targets associated with ischemic heart dieases is highly sought after as the disease involves remodeling of the damaged cardiac tissue which lead to complex cardiovascular conditions. SORT-seq technique employed by Gladka et al. enable study of single-cell gene expression data of both healthy and ischemic adult mice hearts. Although, bulk RNA sequencing showed upregulation of Ckap4 gene in ischemic heart, single-cell sequencing using SORT-seq revealed that Ckap4 upregulation is specifically seen in activated fibroblasts of ischemic hearts, which shows the advantages of SCA in identifying novel pathological markers for diagnosis [26],[89]. Also, SCA techniques including scRNA-seq and Single Cell Assay for transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing (scATAC-seq) are employed to understand cardiac regeneration by studying different regulatory networks and fate decisions in stem cell differentiation of embryonic heart development in mice [90].

    Both innate and adaptive immune systems play a major role in our body's defense against harmful pathogens and their associated diseases. Immune dysfunction such as acting on self-antigens in these systems leads to autoimmunity and related autoimmune diseases including diabetes, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), etc., which have been studied extensively to understand underlying immune cell mechanisms. Different immune cell types including regulatory CD4+ T cells, Dendritic cells, Cytotoxic CD8+ T cells are involved in the homeostasis and immune tolerance mechanism. Major auto immune diseases have immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive agents as treatment regimen which has varied results from patient to patient because of the complexity in the immune cell landscape. SCA technology is gaining significance in the study of these cell types for their heterogeneity, predictive biomarkers and multi-omics in the context of auto-immune diseases. Alterations in dendritic cells (DCs), e.g. absence of DCs in animal models has shown to induce autoimmunity and other associated development of autoimmune diseases [91]. Distinctive subsets of DCs involved in the immune response of DCs to treatments in patients may be associated with varied response to treatments. Ashton et al. studied DCs gene expression in healthy, RA and SLE by single-cell sorting using BD FACS and then analyzed the gene expression using single-cell RT-PCR. They found increased levels of gene expression of CD86 in CD1c+ cDCs, TLR7 and IRF7 in pDCs and TAP1 and IFNAR1 in RA and SLE DC subtypes [91]. These results correlate with previous findings of increased capacity to activate T cells, produce type I IFNs and processing of antigens respectively; combinedly showing that single cell analysis of Immune cell subtype can reveal unique biomarkers which can be used to design treatment regimes.

    Loss or losing functionality of insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas due to inflammatory infiltrates results in deregulation of blood glucose levels leading to a disease condition called diabetes mellitus and eventually other pathological conditions in humans. Evaluating the heterogeneity in the beta cells and other pancreatic cells can reveal the plasticity in the pancreas towards understanding the trigger for diabetes and its progression. With the use of single-cell analysis technologies including single-cell transcriptomics and single-cell RNA-seq, Tritschler et al. have discovered a proliferative β-cell subpopulations in pancreatic cells which can be targeted for enhancing proliferation and maturation, similarly SCA can probe for any potential cell subpopulations with regenerative capacity to form new beta cells, in the diseased state [3]. Single cell transcriptome analysis has revealed heterogeneity of progenitor marker expressing acinar cell subpopulation of acinar cells in the pancreas which shows the regeneration potential in acinar cells [92]. Findings like these can broaden the information on developmental processes in pancreatic cell niche and help us characterize cells and develop regenerative cell therapies for treating diabetes. In search for new biomarkers for early detection of Type 1 diabetes (T1D) Kallionpaa et al. studied RNA-seq of Autoantibody+ prediabetic children CD4+, CD8+ and B-cells which are linked to T1D pathogenesis and in their study they report upregulation of CD52 in only CD4+, downregulation of IFNG CD8+ cells and upregulation of pro-inflammatory Il-32 secretion in β-cells; which shows the inflammatory niche involved in T1D and potential biomarkers [93]. Studies like single cell profiling of target cell types have the capability to reveal biomarkers for early detection of diabetes.

    Various genetical and environmental factors are involved in the development of SLE. Improper balance between apoptotic material disposal and cellular apoptosis leads to chronic inflammation and eventually to an auto immune disease, SLE. As immune response against autoantibodies and anti-double strand DNA antibodies is highly involved in the development of SLE, immune profiling in patients could reveal novel biomarkers for targeting SLE. In that context, Jin Zhongbo et al. studied the individual monocyte cell subtypes from the blood samples of SLE patients for their single-cell gene expression. In contrast to bulk cell analysis which show correlation between disease activity and type I IFN induced gene expression, single cell gene expression analysis in this study showed patterns independent of disease activity and treatment, hinting on the reevaluation of known biomarkers in identify SLE [94]. In another study, William et al. showed the advantages of mass cytometry studies in profiling single-cell phenotypic and functional aspects of SLE associated target cells. They have found a distinct cytokine signature in monocyte phenotype of CD14hi with increased levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP1), macrophage inflammatory protein-1β (Mip1β), and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) [95]. Overall, with emerging technologies in single cell analysis such as scRNA-seq, Mass cytometry, microfluidics, etc., new insights into immune cell plasticity such as recently discovered innate lymphoid cells (ILC) which are equipped to sense environmental threats [96], can be probed and aid discovery of cellular mechanisms involved in autoimmune diseases.

    Cancer is a disease that arises due to deregulated cell growth and leads to the formation of tumors which interfere with the organ functionality. Cell heterogeneity has been identified within the same tumor revealing the complex traits of cancer cells and isolation and study of these heterogeneity in cancer cells is critical to develop targeted medicine [97],[98]. Molecular profiling of therapeutic targets such as lymphotoxin activation gene 3 (LAG3) and PD-1 which binds to MHC II molecules with high affinity and is highly upregulated in exhausted T cells and other tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, serving as an immune checkpoint blockade and blocking of LAG3 has shown to improve anti-tumor T cell responses. SCA technologies such as single-nucleus sequencing and Fluidigm C1 single chip have demonstrated the ability to automate single-cell lyses, RNA extraction, and cDNA synthesis in parallel. SCA techniques like these can be employed to process and detect complex EMT/MET molecular markers/signals and other checkpoint proteins such as LAG3 which were revealed in exhausted T cells by Woosung Chung et al. from studying single-cell RNA-seq data of tumour cellular landscape, which is highly unlikely in case of bulk RNA/cDNA isolations from heterogenous populations of metastatic and non-metastatic cancer cells, eventually boosting development of anti-metastatic therapies [98][101]. Single cell transcriptomics data used to characterize glioma as a systemic brain disease found single tumor cells detected throughout the brain exhibiting power of SCA in deciphering disease profiles [102]. Also, single-cell DNA sequencing has made significant discoveries of mutational evolution in tumors revealing diverse phenotypes of cancer cells [103]. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are found to be majorly responsible for metastasis of cancer and are in extremely low abundance in vivo [104]. Diagnostic devices powered by microfluidic devices have exhibited the ability to detect CTCs, offering early diagnosis and increased survival rates in cancer patients [105]. Microfluidic technology in single-cell isolation has become popular and is employed in various types of cancer research. One such study reports detecting metastatic cancer cells based on their phenotypic traits such as size and deformability, where cancer cells are captured using microchannels of various dimensions in a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) device with an efficiency of more than 78%. Microfluidic technologies like these can improve primary cancer diagnostics while eliminating the need for preprocessing and labeling of cells in blood [106]. In other studies, detection of cancer cells was achieved by analyzing the output signal from captured/uncaptured cells which were surface functionalized with various components including anti-EpCAM (epithelial cell adhesion molecule) and anti-EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) RNA aptamers which bind with upregulated proteins specific to cancer cells, nano roughness and other ligands specific to cancer cell adhesion [59],[107],[108]. Other technique like formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded-disagammaegation for intracellular signaling in single epithelial cells from tissues (FFPE-DISSECT) preserved the native environment of cells on which time-of-flight mass spectrometry (CyTOF) was applied to study single cell activities such as signaling pathways which can count in pathologically significant signals from smaller populations of cells unlike western blot or ELISA which consider homogeneity in cell populations. Using FFPE-DISSECT Simmons et al. found differential tumor necrosis factor-alpha associated signaling in intestinal enterocytes, goblet cells, and enteroendocrine cells and reduced differentiation in colorectal cancer specimen compared to normal colons [82]. Techniques like FFPE-DISSECT can be applied to study cellular landscapes in tissue microenvironment especially in various tumors to assess drug responses and help reveal resistant subpopulation of cells. Various cancer disease progression factors including cellular metastasis & stemness profiles, intratumor heterogeneity, DNA methylation and many other unknown mechanisms can be investigated with the latest SCA techniques.

    Figure 3.  SCA role in study of diseases.

    Cell adhesion plays a vital role in signaling, tissue development and maintenance. “Cell adhesion model” predicts that the number of chemical bonds to the surface is proportional to how much of cell sticks [109]. Cell differentiation, cell cycle, cell migration and cell survival are in part stimulated by signals involving cellular adhesion [110]. Hence, there is a need to study the cell adhesion mechanisms at a single-cell level to learn more about the interconnectivity between adhesion-based signaling and cellular response. Irregularities in cell adhesion mechanisms can be a prominent event for the onset of diseases including arthritis, cancer, osteoporosis, and atherosclerosis [110][118]. A diverse system of transmembrane glycoproteins called Cell adhesion molecules (CAM) including I-CAM, V-CAM, selectins, integrins, etc., has been linked in cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix adhesion and is responsible for the development and maintenance of the tissues. Research shows that the disruption of epithelial cellular interactions with extracellular matrix (ECM) leads to apoptosis, a phenomenon known as “anoikis” [119]. Tumor cells have gained the potential to resist the anoikis process by over expression of caspase-8 inhibitor FLIP which is involved in death receptor pathways and bcl-2 family based anti-apoptotic protein in mitochondrial pathways, promoting metastasis of cancer [120]. Cell adhesion molecules are highly involved in tumor metastasis and other cellular invasiveness such as T cell infiltration in endothelial dysfunction which is indicative of aging effects [113],[121]. An in-vitro assay of a tumor spheroid in a 3D collagen matrix was performed to study the stress induced by fibrosarcoma cells on matrix gel; revealing a large contractile force on the matrix before invasion [122]. Single-cell force spectroscopy and single-molecule force microscopy used in combination with Atomic force microscope (AFM) and optical microscopy can probe the forces between cell-substrate, cell receptor and ligand, revealing the cell elasticity and other receptor binding behaviors towards various ligands like proteins, improving design of molecular target moieties in drug delivery [123]. Towards measuring cell adhesion, Sifeng Mao et al. developed live single-cell extractor (LSCE) which uses trypsin in between vertical channels to separate cells and the outlet channel for trypsin on the chamber is aspirated to remove the adhered cell and the time taken for the cell to detach is calculated towards the cell and biomaterial adhesion strength [124]. SCA method like LSCE can investigate better cell culture biomaterials, modified ECM-cell interactions and cell heterogeneity profile based on biomaterials unlike conventional methods which use cell spreading and viability for analyzing cell-adhesion behaviors. This research display that nano and micro scale topographical features from substrates have a strong influence on cell adhesion, alignment, morphology and contact guidance which in part dictates the cell behavior. Studies on naturally occurring nano-textured surfaces (NTS) such as dragonfly wings have shown anti-bactericidal properties, where strong adhesive forces are seen between the NTS and E.coli producing a fatal amount of shear on cell membrane when bacteria moves, killing the bacterial cell [60]. Also, NTS has seen to have profound effect on how metastatic cancer cells change their morphology in comparison with non-metastatic cells; the shape change in metastatic cancer cells is higher in NTS than smooth substrates showing the topological significance in cell-substrate interactions [59]. Therefore, SCA techniques for examining cellular responses for novel nano and microscale topographical substrates is noteworthy to assess the cellular behavior at single cell level to find significant molecular interactions [61],[125]. The neurons in the brain are interconnected presumably by cell adhesion molecules to form the circuits which are responsible for various neurological signaling pathways of the human body and many related cell surface molecules such as cadherin, neurexin, immunoglobulins and leucine-rich repeat protein superfamilies' are currently investigated in the context of neural circuitry [126]. Overall, studying cell adhesion at single-cell-level can help us understand cell signaling events, phenotype and morphology and develop diagnostics such as cancer detection based on surface or substrate adhesion-based cell capture.

    Variable treatment responses is of major concern as it drives up costs in drug development, hospital care and other healthcare related proceedings. SCA driven tools and techniques developed and the data generated from them are facilitating clinical studies such as pre-implantation diagnosis [127], immune and disease cell responses to drugs [62], in vitro models to assess response of immune cells e.g. CAR-T cells before transplantation [56], etc where heterogenous cell populations are considered unlike conventional bulk populations, improving response rate, reducing drug development costs and inherently improving economics of healthcare. Hui Dong et al. developed a SCA technique, where a microchip was used to culture human breast cancer cells (MCF-7) and treated them with drug reagents like methyl methane sulfonate, docetaxel, colchicine followed by cell lysis, amplification of specific genes to study the genotoxicity induced from the drug reagents; exhibiting the possibility of reducing reagent consumptions and instrumental cost per reaction [62]. Similarly, Yu Du et al. developed a new in vitro model of a liver sinusoid, mimicking the in vivo structure and function using four kinds of functional hepatic cells and a layered structure [63]. Devices like these can be used to understand the organ functionality, cytotoxic metabolism and other drug induced responses in desired cell populations. In another intriguing approach to analyze mechanical biomarkers, acoustic actuation was employed for drug-screening platforms to screen multiple single cells at the same time [128]. This technique works by creating acoustic streaming resulting in hydrodynamic forces which deform the cells and the deformability factor generated can be used as a mechanical biomarker in screening drug responses and identifying highly deformative and invasive metastatic subpopulations in cancer cells; which can serve as an early diagnosis marker. Another study where single cell cultures were analyzed with techniques such as RNA FISH and ATAC-seq to assess whether cancer cells gain resistance through genetic inheritance or epigenetic reprogramming during drug treatment; and it was discovered that small fraction of cell subpopulations with high resistance markers undergo further epigenetic reprogramming such as loss of SOX10 and activation of other new signaling pathways which made them shift from transient transcriptional state to a stable resistant state exhibiting a multi stage drug resistance attainment in cancer cells; these new approaches can create new clinical models to design personalized drug dosages [129]. Also, investigating cell-cell signaling, especially immune cells which are linked with major diseases and aging, could help in designing treatment strategies; for instance, Sarkar et al. developed a microfluidic single step loading droplet array platform where they encapsulated individual single human T cells and dendritic cell in nanoliter droplets with a facility to activate cells after encapsulation for e.g. in this study ovalbumin activated dendritic cell and T-cell dynamic interactions including intracellular cytoplasmic calcium levels, an indicator of in T cells activation and cell-cell contact cytotoxicity of T-cells in various environments [56]. SCA platforms like these could be employed for drug screenings, development of vaccines and study complex cell-cell interactions and their dynamics of mapping in various cell contact profiles eventually improving cellular engineering. Large datasets from “omics” studies can provide information in creating novel algorithms and experimental models to be used for Insilco drug design and modeling which can empower pre-clinical and personalized medicine.

    In single cell analysis, studies are in the scale of micro and nano dimensions where obtaining better resolution of the images and control over molecular size is quite challenging. When cells are studied in vitro they are not in their natural habitat and we lose the capability to study their original characteristic features which demand for better in vivo mimicking study models for SCA. SCA omics studies produce a massive amount of data which consists of biologically and pathologically significant signals along with noise. Better theoretical models and sophisticated algorithms in computational programs are required for efficiently detecting those important signals, such as sub-cellular population data, and relevant genomic transcript data from the noise produced in omics'. A more detailed review of challenges in single cell analysis is laid out by Guo-Cheng Yuan et al. [130].

    Validation of cell types and lineages and significant molecular entities identified through single cell experimental procedures is of critical importance in creating standard logistics which can help in further clinical discoveries and downstream applications. There is a need for development of lineage tracing technologies which have a potential of mapping disease development and progressions in creating prediction models to track various stages of an unknown pandemic and epidemic disease outbreaks based on shared genetical and epigenetical transcripts, for instance, Hayes J et al. were able to identify novel microRNA signatures in a varying severity of gliblastoma in patients helping them to build a survival risk score which may be further employed in designing therapies [131]. Leonard D. Goldstein et al. report a novel nanowell-based single-cell RNA sequencing system called ICELL8 microchip which has the capacity to sequence 1300 single cells and characterize cell types [132]. Devices like ICELL8 accompanied with powerful computation tools can help profile gene expressions of various species cells concurrently enabling comparative disease profile analysis across species revealing common pathologically significant mechanisms and their innate therapeutic pathways which may help in pre-clinical drug screenings in our mammalian counterparts [133]. Genetic mosaicism appears to be a rule more than an exception and every cell in the human body have their own personal genome, i.e. a unique genomic signature [127]. Unique genetic signatures of cells, cellular molecular profiles and other microenvironment information produced from SCA techniques can be used to develop nanoparticles/nanobots [134] with biophysical actuating and sensing capabilities like cellular barcoding [135] or acoustofluidic coating [31] incorporation to image or sense for diagnostic and therapeutic cues in vivo. In single cells the volume of molecules available to fit into a model is of very low concentrations and significant mechanisms at cellular level might be due to the chance encounter of reactant molecules, To avoid false positive data, there is a need for more robust molecular probes and efficient data interpretation of information generated from SCA. One such approach via stochastic modeling of the whole biochemical signaling network of single cell can enable us to understand the molecular evolution of reactive species and can help build single cell atlas. For instance, Khatibipour et al. have developed a software, jacobian-based method (JacLy) in an attempt to analyze metabolic interactions and fluctuations from small networks in metabolome data [136],[137]. Similarly, cellular data modeling such as the one developed by Mitra Mjtahedi et al., can be deployed in clinics for having estimations on the production of cell colonies of the reprogrammed cell and their therapeutic metabolites improving product economics in pharamecutical industry [9]. Although SCA techniques have a great potential to analyze with molecular resolution, there is a need to develop more physiology-driven models mimicking organ microenvironment where pathologically significant cells and other biological entities like bacteria, virus can be studied more robustly [63] to investigate their genotype and phenotype changes in an relevant physiological environment than convetional in vitro 2D cell cultures [138]. And enormous data generated from the Omics study of single cells usually contains noise signal which may hinder the ability to find physiologically significant signals. Development of efficient measurement models is needed to identify significant signals from noise e.g. Bayesian probabilistic models integrated into single-cell RNA-sequencing measurements have the power to detect differential expression signatures and identify cellular subpopulations despite the noise at single cell level [139]. Interdisciplinary oriented research teams in single cell analysis can improve research output as SCA deals with various sciences including biochemistry, molecular biology, computational biology, biophysics, etc. Finally, we are in an era of studying single cell biology and understanding the most fundamental mechanisms that characterize life and its irregularities which lead to aging and disease.


    Acknowledgments



    Graphical figures created using Biorender.

    Conflict of interest



    The authors declare no conflict of interest for the contributions in this manuscript.

    [1] Armbrecht L, Dittrich PS (2017) Recent Advances in the Analysis of Single Cells. Anal Chem 89: 2-21. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04255
    [2] Al Amir Dache Z, Otandault A, Tanos R, et al. (2020) Blood contains circulating cell-free respiratory competent mitochondria. FASEB J 34: 3616-3630. doi: 10.1096/fj.201901917RR
    [3] Tritschler S, Theis FJ, Lickert H, et al. (2017) Systematic single-cell analysis provides new insights into heterogeneity and plasticity of the pancreas. Mol Metab 6: 974-990. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2017.06.021
    [4] Ryan FP (2016) Viral symbiosis and the holobiontic nature of the human genome. APMIS 124: 11-19. doi: 10.1111/apm.12488
    [5] Dimijian GG (2000) Evolving together: the biology of symbiosis, part 2. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 13: 381-390. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2000.11927712
    [6] Hofmeyr JHS (2008) The harmony of the cell: cellular processes. Essays Biochem 45: 57-66. doi: 10.1042/bse0450057
    [7] Lane N, Martin W (2010) The energetics of genome complexity. Nature 467: 929-934. doi: 10.1038/nature09486
    [8] Wallace DC (2007) Why Do We Still Have a Maternally Inherited Mitochondrial DNA? Insights from Evolutionary Medicine. Annu Rev Biochem 76: 781-821. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.081205.150955
    [9] Mojtahedi M, Skupin A, Zhou J, et al. (2016) Cell Fate Decision as High-Dimensional Critical State Transition. PLoS Biol 14: 1-29. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000640
    [10] From M, Hematopoietic P (2015) Brief Report: Single-Cell Analysis Reveals Cell Division-Independent Emergence of Stem Cells. Stem Cells 33: 3152-3157. doi: 10.1002/stem.2106
    [11] Kolodziejczyk AA, Kim JK, Svensson V, et al. (2015) The Technology and Biology of Single-Cell RNA Sequencing. Mol Cell 58: 610-620. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.005
    [12] Ziegenhain C, Vieth B, Parekh S, et al. (2017) Comparative Analysis of Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Methods. Mol Cell 65: 631-643.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.01.023
    [13] Rosenberg AB, Roco CM, Muscat RA, et al. (2018) Single-cell profiling of the developing mouse brain and spinal cord with split-pool barcoding. Science 360: 176-182. doi: 10.1126/science.aam8999
    [14] Lee BWL, Ghode P, Ong DST (2019) Redox regulation of cell state and fate. Redox Biol 25: 101056. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2018.11.014
    [15] Trapnell C (2015) Defining cell types and states with single-cell genomics. Genome Res 25: 1491-1498. doi: 10.1101/gr.190595.115
    [16] MacLean AL, Hong T, Nie Q (2018) Exploring intermediate cell states through the lens of single cells. Curr Opin Syst Biol 9: 32-41. doi: 10.1016/j.coisb.2018.02.009
    [17] Hu P, Zhang W, Xin H, et al. (2016) Single Cell Isolation and Analysis. Front Cell Dev Biol 4: 1-12.
    [18] Armbrecht L, Dittrich PS (2017) Recent Advances in the Analysis of Single Cells. Anal Chem 89: 2-21. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04255
    [19] Bengtsson M, Ståhlberg A, Rorsman P, et al. (2005) Gene expression profiling in single cells from the pancreatic islets of Langerhans reveals lognormal distribution of mRNA levels. Genome Res 15: 1388-1392. doi: 10.1101/gr.3820805
    [20] Wang J, Min Z, Jin M, et al. (2015) Protocol for Single Cell Isolation by Flow Cytometry BT- Single Cell Sequencing and Systems Immunology. Single Cell Sequencing and Systems Immunology, Translational Bioinformatics Dordrecht: Springer, 155-163. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9753-5_11
    [21] Espina V, Wulfkuhle JD, Calvert VS, et al. (2006) Laser-capture microdissection. Nat Protoc 1: 586-603. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.85
    [22] Reece A, Xia B, Jiang Z, et al. (2016) Microfluidic techniques for high throughput single cell analysis. Curr Opin Biotechnol 40: 90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.02.015
    [23] Torres AJ, Hill AS, Love JC (2014) Nanowell-based immunoassays for measuring single-cell secretion: characterization of transport and surface binding. Anal Chem 86: 11562-11569. doi: 10.1021/ac4030297
    [24] Islam M, Sajid A, Mahmood MAI, et al. (2015) Nanotextured polymer substrates show enhanced cancer cell isolation and cell culture. Nanotechnology 26: 225101. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/26/22/225101
    [25] Fang T, Shang W, Liu C, et al. (2019) Nondestructive Identification and Accurate Isolation of Single Cells through a Chip with Raman Optical Tweezers. Anal Chem 91: 9932-9939. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b01604
    [26] Muraro MJ, Dharmadhikari G, Grün D, et al. (2016) A Single-Cell Transcriptome Atlas of the Human Pancreas. Cell Syst 3: 385-394.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.09.002
    [27] Ji Y, Qi D, Li L, et al. (2019) Multiplexed profiling of single-cell extracellular vesicles secretion. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116: 5979-5984. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1814348116
    [28] Yeo T, Tan SJ, Lim CL, et al. (2016) Microfluidic enrichment for the single cell analysis of circulating tumor cells. Sci Rep 6: 22076. doi: 10.1038/srep22076
    [29] Yuan J, Sheng J, Sims PA (2018) SCOPE-Seq: a scalable technology for linking live cell imaging and single-cell RNA sequencing. Genome Biol 19: 227. doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1607-x
    [30] Ettinger A, Wittmann T (2014) Fluorescence live cell imaging. Methods Cell Biol 123: 77-94. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-420138-5.00005-7
    [31] Ayan B, Ozcelik A, Bachman H, et al. (2016) Acoustofluidic coating of particles and cells. Lab Chip 16: 4366-4372. doi: 10.1039/C6LC00951D
    [32] Johnson BN, Mutharasan R (2016) Acoustofluidic particle trapping, manipulation, and release using dynamic-mode cantilever sensors. Analyst Dec 142: 123-131. doi: 10.1039/C6AN01743F
    [33] Mao Z, Li P, Wu M, et al. (2017) Enriching Nanoparticles via Acoustofluidics. ACS Nano 11: 603-612. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b06784
    [34] Acero Sanchez JL, Joda H, Henry OYF, et al. (2017) Electrochemical Genetic Profiling of Single Cancer Cells. Anal Chem 89: 3378-3385. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03973
    [35] Long D, Shang Y, Qiu Y, et al. (2018) A single-cell analysis platform for electrochemiluminescent detection of platelets adhesion to endothelial cells based on Au@DL-ZnCQDs nanoprobes. Biosens Bioelectron 102: 553-559. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2017.11.058
    [36] Zhang J, Zhou J, Pan R, et al. (2018) New Frontiers and Challenges for Single-Cell Electrochemical Analysis. ACS Sens 3: 242-250. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.7b00711
    [37] Yang W, Tu Z, Wang H, et al. (2018) The mechanism of reduced IgG/IgE-binding of beta-lactoglobulin by pulsed electric field pretreatment combined with glycation revealed by ECD/FTICR-MS. Food Funct 9: 417-425. doi: 10.1039/C7FO01082F
    [38] Umar A, Jaremko M, Burgers PC, et al. (2008) High-throughput proteomics of breast carcinoma cells: a focus on FTICR-MS. Expert Rev Proteomics 5: 445-455. doi: 10.1586/14789450.5.3.445
    [39] Tosevski V, Ulashchik E, Trovato A, et al. (2017) CyTOF Mass Cytometry for Click Proliferation Assays. Curr Protoc Cytom 81: 7.50.1-7.50.14.
    [40] Fletcher JS, Rabbani S, Henderson A, et al. (2008) A new dynamic in mass spectral imaging of single biological cells. Anal Chem 80: 9058-9064. doi: 10.1021/ac8015278
    [41] Shen Y, Tolic N, Masselon C, et al. (2004) Ultrasensitive proteomics using high-efficiency on-line micro-SPE-nanoLC-nanoESI MS and MS/MS. Anal Chem 76: 144-154. doi: 10.1021/ac030096q
    [42] VanInsberghe M, Zahn H, White AK, et al. (2018) Highly multiplexed single-cell quantitative PCR. PLoS One 13: e0191601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191601
    [43] Chen J, Xu Y, Shi Y, et al. (2019) Functionalization of Atomic Force Microscope Cantilevers with Single-T Cells or Single-Particle for Immunological Single-Cell Force Spectroscopy. J Vis Exp e59609.
    [44] Lulevich V, Zink T, Chen HY, et al. (2006) Cell Mechanics Using Atomic Force Microscopy-Based Single-Cell Compression. Langmuir 22: 8151-8155. doi: 10.1021/la060561p
    [45] Balasubramanian S, Kagan D, Hu CMJ, et al. (2011) Micromachine-enabled capture and isolation of cancer cells in complex media. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 50: 4161-4164. doi: 10.1002/anie.201100115
    [46] Esteban-Fernandez de Avila B, Martin A, Soto F, et al. (2015) Single Cell Real-Time miRNAs Sensing Based on Nanomotors. ACS Nano 9: 6756-6764. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b02807
    [47] Zhang Y, Jin L, Xu J, et al. (2017) Dynamic characterization of drug resistance and heterogeneity of the gastric cancer cell BGC823 using single-cell Raman spectroscopy. Analyst 143: 164-174. doi: 10.1039/C7AN01287J
    [48] Franco D, Trusso S, Fazio E, et al. (2017) Raman spectroscopy differentiates between sensitive and resistant multiple myeloma cell lines. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 187: 15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2017.06.020
    [49] Bayani J, Squire JA (2004) Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH). Curr Protoc cell Biol Chapter 22: Unit 22.4.
    [50] Yurov YB, Vostrikov VM, Vorsanova SG, et al. (2001) Multicolor fluorescent in situ hybridization on post-mortem brain in schizophrenia as an approach for identification of low-level chromosomal aneuploidy in neuropsychiatric diseases. Brain Dev 23: 186-190. doi: 10.1016/S0387-7604(01)00363-1
    [51] Querido E, Dekakra-Bellili L, Chartrand P (2017) RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization for high-content screening. Methods 126: 149-155. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.07.005
    [52] Ravindranathan A, Diolaiti ME, Cimini BA, et al. (2019) In Situ Visualization of Telomere Length, Telomere Elongation, and TERT Expression in Single Cells. Curr Protoc Cell Biol 85: e97. doi: 10.1002/cpcb.97
    [53] Habib N, Li Y, Heidenreich M, et al. (2016) Div-Seq: Single-nucleus RNA-Seq reveals dynamics of rare adult newborn neurons. Science 353: 925-928. doi: 10.1126/science.aad7038
    [54] Spaethling JM, Na YJ, Lee J, et al. (2017) Primary Cell Culture of Live Neurosurgically Resected Aged Adult Human Brain Cells and Single Cell Transcriptomics. Cell Rep 18: 791-803. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.066
    [55] Morita Y, Ema H, Nakauchi H (2010) Heterogeneity and hierarchy within the most primitive hematopoietic stem cell compartment. J Exp Med 207: 1173-1182. doi: 10.1084/jem.20091318
    [56] Sarkar S, Motwani V, Sabhachandani P, et al. (2015) T Cell Dynamic Activation and Functional Analysis in Nanoliter Droplet Microarray. J Clin Cell Immunol 6: 334. doi: 10.4172/2155-9899.1000334
    [57] Ludwig LS, Lareau CA, Ulirsch JC, et al. (2019) Lineage Tracing in Humans Enabled by Mitochondrial Mutations and Single-Cell Genomics. Cell 176: 1325-1339.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.022
    [58] Mishra P, Martin DC, Androulakis IP, et al. (2019) Fluorescence Imaging of Actin Turnover Parses Early Stem Cell Lineage Divergence and Senescence. Sci Rep 9: 10377. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46682-y
    [59] Mansur N, Hasan MR, Kim Y, et al. (2017) Functionalization of nanotextured substrates for enhanced identification of metastatic breast cancer cells. Nanotechnology 28: 385101. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/aa7f84
    [60] Nguyen AT, Sathe SR, Yim EKF (2016) From nano to micro: topographical scale and its impact on cell adhesion, morphology and contact guidance. J Phys Condens Matter 28: 183001. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/28/18/183001
    [61] Palmer CP, Mycielska ME, Burcu H, et al. (2008) Single cell adhesion measuring apparatus (SCAMA): Application to cancer cell lines of different metastatic potential and voltage-gated Na+ channel expression. Eur Biophys J 37: 359-368. doi: 10.1007/s00249-007-0219-2
    [62] Dong H, Sun H, Zheng J (2016) A microchip for integrated single-cell genotoxicity assay. Talanta 161: 804-811. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.09.040
    [63] Du Y, Li N, Yang H, et al. (2017) Mimicking Liver Sinusoidal Structures and Functions using a 3D-configured Microfluidic Chip. Lab Chip 17-20.
    [64] Kaminski TS, Scheler O, Garstecki P (2016) Droplet microfluidics for microbiology: techniques, applications and challenges. Lab Chip 16: 2168-2187. doi: 10.1039/C6LC00367B
    [65] Gawel DR, Serra-Musach J, Lilja S, et al. (2019) A validated single-cell-based strategy to identify diagnostic and therapeutic targets in complex diseases. Genome Med 11: 47. doi: 10.1186/s13073-019-0657-3
    [66] Vaux DL, Haecker G, Strasser A (1994) An Evolutionary on Apoptosis Perspective Minireview. Cell 76: 777-779. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90350-6
    [67] Kowalczyk MS, Tirosh I, Heckl D, et al. (2015) Single-cell RNA-seq reveals changes in cell cycle and differentiation programs upon aging of hematopoietic stem cells. Genome Res 25: 1860-1872. doi: 10.1101/gr.192237.115
    [68] Apple DM, Solano-Fonseca R, Kokovay E (2017) Neurogenesis in the aging brain. Biochem Pharmacol 141: 77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.06.116
    [69] Dulken BW, Buckley MT, Navarro Negredo P, et al. (2019) Single-cell analysis reveals T cell infiltration in old neurogenic niches. Nature 571: 205-210. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1362-5
    [70] Ximerakis M, Lipnick SL, Simmons SK, et al. (2018) Single-cell transcriptomics of the aged mouse brain reveals convergent, divergent and unique aging signatures. bioRxiv 440032.
    [71] Zhang Y, Kim MS, Jia B, et al. (2017) Hypothalamic stem cells control ageing speed partly through exosomal miRNAs. Nature 548: 52-57. doi: 10.1038/nature23282
    [72] Kim Y, Karthikeyan K, Chirvi S, et al. (2009) Neuro-optical microfluidic platform to study injury and regeneration of single axons. Lab Chip 9: 2576-2581. doi: 10.1039/b903720a
    [73] Iourov IY, Vorsanova SG, Yurov YB (2012) Single Cell Genomics of the Brain: Focus on Neuronal Diversity and Neu- ropsychiatric Diseases. Curr Genomics 13: 477-488. doi: 10.2174/138920212802510439
    [74] Graff J, Kim D, Dobbin MM, et al. (2011) Epigenetic Regulation of Gene Expression in Physiological and Pathological Brain Processes. Physiol Rev 91: 603-649. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00012.2010
    [75] Faggioli F, Vijg J, Montagna C (2011) Chromosomal aneuploidy in the aging brain. Mech Ageing Dev 132: 429-436. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2011.04.008
    [76] Yurov YB, Vorsanova SG, Iourov IY (2009) GIN'n'CIN hypothesis of brain aging: deciphering the role of somatic genetic instabilities and neural aneuploidy during ontogeny. Mol Cytogenet 2: 23. doi: 10.1186/1755-8166-2-23
    [77] Kim DW, Washington PW, Wang ZQ, et al. (2019) Single cell RNA-Seq analysis identifies molecular mechanisms controlling hypothalamic patterning and differentiation. bioRxiv 657148.
    [78] Song R, Sarnoski EA, Acar M (2018) The Systems Biology of Single-Cell Aging. iScience 7: 154-169. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2018.08.023
    [79] Coffman JA, Rieger S, Rogers AN, et al. (2016) Comparative biology of tissue repair, regeneration and aging. npj Regen Med 1: 16003. doi: 10.1038/npjregenmed.2016.3
    [80] Hasin Y, Seldin M, Lusis A (2017) Multi-omics approaches to disease. Genome Biol 18: 83. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1215-1
    [81] Safian MF, Zinn N, Seidler J, et al. (2016) Microquantification of phospholipid classes by stable isotope dilution and nanoESI mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 408: 7663-7667. doi: 10.1007/s00216-016-9859-3
    [82] Simmons AJ, Scurrah CR, McKinley ET, et al. (2016) Impaired coordination between signaling pathways is revealed in human colorectal cancer using single-cell mass cytometry of archival tissue blocks. Sci Signal 9: rs11. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aah4413
    [83] Ginsberg SD, Che S, Counts SE, et al. (2006) Single cell gene expression profiling in Alzheimer's disease. NeuroRx 3: 302-318. doi: 10.1016/j.nurx.2006.05.007
    [84] Elstner M, Morris CM, Heim K, et al. (2009) Single-cell expression profiling of dopaminergic neurons combined with association analysis identifies pyridoxal kinase as Parkinson's disease gene. Ann Neurol 66: 792-798. doi: 10.1002/ana.21780
    [85] Darmanis S, Sloan SA, Zhang Y, et al. (2015) A survey of human brain transcriptome diversity at the single cell level. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112: 7285-7290. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1507125112
    [86] Yamada A, Renault R, Chikina A, et al. (2016) Transient microfluidic compartmentalization using actionable microfilaments for biochemical assays, cell culture and organs-on-chip. Lab Chip 16: 4691-4701. doi: 10.1039/C6LC01143H
    [87] Srikakulapu P, Hu D, Yin C, et al. (2016) Artery Tertiary Lymphoid Organs Control Multilayered Territorialized Atherosclerosis B-Cell Responses in Aged ApoE-/- Mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 36: 1174-1185. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.306983
    [88] Winkels H, Ehinger E, Vassallo M, et al. (2018) Atlas of the Immune Cell Repertoire in Mouse Atherosclerosis Defined by Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing and Mass Cytometry. Circ Res 122: 1675-1688. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.312513
    [89] Gladka MM, Molenaar B, de Ruiter H, et al. (2018) Single-Cell Sequencing of the Healthy and Diseased Heart Reveals Cytoskeleton-Associated Protein 4 as a New Modulator of Fibroblasts Activation. Circulation 138: 166-180. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030742
    [90] Jia G, Preussner J, Chen X, et al. (2018) Single cell RNA-seq and ATAC-seq analysis of cardiac progenitor cell transition states and lineage settlement. Nat Commun 9: 4877. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07307-6
    [91] Ashton MP, Eugster A, Dietz S, et al. (2019) Association of Dendritic Cell Signatures With Autoimmune Inflammation Revealed by Single-Cell Profiling. Arthritis Rheumatol 71: 817-828. doi: 10.1002/art.40793
    [92] Wollny D, Zhao S, Everlien I, et al. (2016) Single-Cell Analysis Uncovers Clonal Acinar Cell Heterogeneity in the Adult Pancreas. Dev Cell 39: 289-301. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.10.002
    [93] Kallionpää H, Somani J, Tuomela S, et al. (2019) Early Detection of Peripheral Blood Cell Signature in Children Developing β-Cell Autoimmunity at a Young Age. Diabetes 68: 2024-2034. doi: 10.2337/db19-0287
    [94] Jin Z, Fan W, Jensen MA, et al. (2017) Single-cell gene expression patterns in lupus monocytes independently indicate disease activity, interferon and therapy. Lupus Sci Med 4: e000202. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2016-000202
    [95] O'Gorman WE, Kong DS, Balboni IM, et al. (2017) Mass cytometry identifies a distinct monocyte cytokine signature shared by clinically heterogeneous pediatric SLE patients. J Autoimmun S0896-8411: 30412-7.
    [96] Artis D, Spits H (2015) The biology of innate lymphoid cells. Nature 517: 293-301. doi: 10.1038/nature14189
    [97] Bedard PL, Hansen AR, Ratain MJ, et al. (2013) Tumour heterogeneity in the clinic. Nature 501: 355-364. doi: 10.1038/nature12627
    [98] Chung W, Eum HH, Lee HO, et al. (2017) Single-cell RNA-seq enables comprehensive tumour and immune cell profiling in primary breast cancer. Nat Commun 8: 15081. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15081
    [99] Xin Y, Kim J, Ni M, et al. (2016) Use of the Fluidigm C1 platform for RNA sequencing of single mouse pancreatic islet cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113: 3293-3298. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602306113
    [100] Gong H, Do D, Ramakrishnan R (2018) Single-Cell mRNA-Seq Using the Fluidigm C1 System and Integrated Fluidics Circuits. Methods Mol Biol 1783: 193-207. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7834-2_10
    [101] DeLaughter DM (2018) The Use of the Fluidigm C1 for RNA Expression Analyses of Single Cells. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 122: e55. doi: 10.1002/cpmb.55
    [102] Capper D (2012) Addressing Diffuse Glioma as a Systemic Brain Disease With Single-Cell Analysis. Arch Neurol 69: 523. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.2910
    [103] Wang Y, Waters J, Leung ML, et al. (2014) Clonal evolution in breast cancer revealed by single nucleus genome sequencing. Nature 512: 155-160. doi: 10.1038/nature13600
    [104] Gorgannezhad L, Umer M, Islam MN, et al. (2018) Circulating tumor DNA and liquid biopsy: opportunities, challenges, and recent advances in detection technologies. Lab Chip 18: 1174-1196. doi: 10.1039/C8LC00100F
    [105] Burinaru TA, Avram M, Avram A, et al. (2018) Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells Using Microfluidics. ACS Comb Sci 20: 107-126. doi: 10.1021/acscombsci.7b00146
    [106] Islam M, Asghar W, Kim Y (2014) Cell Elasticity-based Microfluidic Label-free Isolation of Metastatic Tumor Cells. J Adv Med Med Res 4: 2129-2140. doi: 10.9734/BJMMR/2014/7392
    [107] Chen W, Weng S, Zhang F, et al. (2013) Nanoroughened Surfaces for E ffi cient Capture of Circulating Tumor Cells without Using Capture Antibodies. ACS Nano 7: 566-575. doi: 10.1021/nn304719q
    [108] Islam M, Hasan MR, Sajid A, et al. (2016) Electrical Profiling and Aptamer Functionalized Nanotextured Surface in a Single Biochip for the Detection of Tumor Cells. Funct Nanostruct 13-21.
    [109] Shen Y, Nakajima M, Kojima S, et al. (2011) Single cell adhesion force measurement for cell viability identification using an AFM cantilever-based micro putter. Meas Sci Technol 22: 115802. doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/22/11/115802
    [110] Huang S, Ingber DE (1999) The structural and mechanical complexity of cell-growth control. Nat Cell Biol 1: E131-138. doi: 10.1038/13043
    [111] Lasky LA, Singer MS, Dowbenko D, et al. (1992) An endothelial ligand for L-Selectin is a novel mucin-like molecule. Cell 69: 927-938. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90612-G
    [112] Szekanecz Z, Koch AE (2000) Cell-cell interactions in synovitis. Endothelial cells and immune cell migration. Arthritis Res 2: 368-373. doi: 10.1186/ar114
    [113] Okegawa T, Pong RC, Li Y, et al. (2004) The role of cell adhesion molecule in cancer progression and its application in cancer therapy. Acta Biochim Pol 51: 445-457. doi: 10.18388/abp.2004_3583
    [114] Hirohashi S, Kanai Y (2003) Cell adhesion system and human cancer morphogenesis. Cancer Sci 94: 575-581. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2003.tb01485.x
    [115] Perinpanayagam H, Zaharias R, Stanford C, et al. (2001) Early cell adhesion events differ between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic osteoblasts. J Orthop Res 19: 993-1000. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00045-6
    [116] Serhan CN, Savill J (2005) Resolution of inflammation: the beginning programs the end. Nat Immunol 6: 1191-1197. doi: 10.1038/ni1276
    [117] Simon SI, Green CE (2005) Molecular Mechanics and Dynamics of Leukocyte Recruitment During Inflammation. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 7: 151-185. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.7.060804.100423
    [118] Oh KS, Patel H, Gottschalk RA, et al. (2017) Anti-Inflammatory Chromatinscape Suggests Alternative Mechanisms of Glucocorticoid Receptor Action. Immunity 47: 298-309.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.07.012
    [119] Frisch SM, Francis H (1994) Disruption of epithelial cell-matrix interaction induces apoptosis. J Cell Biol 124: 619-626. doi: 10.1083/jcb.124.4.619
    [120] Simpson CD, Anyiwe K, Schimmer AD (2008) Anoikis resistance and tumor metastasis. Cancer Lett 272: 177-185. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.05.029
    [121] Trott DW, Henson GD, Ho MHT, et al. (2018) Age-related arterial immune cell infiltration in mice is attenuated by caloric restriction or voluntary exercise. Exp Gerontol 109: 99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2016.12.016
    [122] Valencia AMJ, Wu PH, Yogurtcu ON, et al. (2015) Collective cancer cell invasion induced by coordinated contractile stresses. Oncotarget 6: 43438-43451. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5874
    [123] Helenius J, Heisenberg CP, Gaub HE, et al. (2008) Single-cell force spectroscopy. J Cell Sci 121: 1785-1791. doi: 10.1242/jcs.030999
    [124] Mao S, Zhang Q, Li H, et al. (2018) Measurement of Cell–Matrix Adhesion at Single-Cell Resolution for Revealing the Functions of Biomaterials for Adherent Cell Culture. Anal Chem 90: 9637-9643. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02653
    [125] Kwon KW, Choi SS, Lee SH, et al. (2007) Label-free, microfluidic separation and enrichment of human breast cancer cells by adhesion difference. Lab Chip 7: 1461-1468. doi: 10.1039/b710054j
    [126] de Wit J, Ghosh A (2015) Specification of synaptic connectivity by cell surface interactions. Nat Rev Neurosci 17: 4. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2015.3
    [127] Speicher MR (2013) Single-cell analysis: toward the clinic. Genome Med 5: 74. doi: 10.1186/gm478
    [128] Xie Y, Nama N, Li P, et al. (2016) Probing Cell Deformability via Acoustically Actuated Bubbles. Small 12: 902-910. doi: 10.1002/smll.201502220
    [129] Shaffer SM, Dunagin MC, Torborg SR, et al. (2017) Rare cell variability and drug-induced reprogramming as a mode of cancer drug resistance. Nature 546: 431-435. doi: 10.1038/nature22794
    [130] Yuan GC, Cai L, Elowitz M, et al. (2017) Challenges and emerging directions in single-cell analysis. Genome Biol 18: 84. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1218-y
    [131] Hayes J, Thygesen H, Tumilson C, et al. (2015) Prediction of clinical outcome in glioblastoma using a biologically relevant nine-microRNA signature. Mol Oncol 9: 704-714. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.11.004
    [132] Goldstein LD, Chen YJJ, Dunne J, et al. (2017) Massively parallel nanowell-based single-cell gene expression profiling. BMC Genomics 18: 519. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3893-1
    [133] Aytes A, Mitrofanova A, Lefebvre C, et al. (2014) Cross-Species Regulatory Network Analysis Identifies a Synergistic Interaction between FOXM1 and CENPF that Drives Prostate Cancer Malignancy. Cancer Cell 25: 638-651. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.03.017
    [134] Peyer KE, Zhang L, Nelson BJ (2013) Bio-inspired magnetic swimming microrobots for biomedical applications. Nanoscale 5: 1259-1272. doi: 10.1039/C2NR32554C
    [135] Yamanaka YJ, Szeto GL, Gierahn TM, et al. (2012) Cellular Barcodes for Efficiently Profiling Single-Cell Secretory Responses by Microengraving. Anal Chem 84: 10531-10536. doi: 10.1021/ac302264q
    [136] Song R, Acar M (2019) Stochastic modeling of aging cells reveals how damage accumulation, repair, and cell-division asymmetry affect clonal senescence and population fitness. BMC Bioinformatics 20: 391. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-2921-3
    [137] Bressloff PC, Newby JM (2013) Stochastic models of intracellular transport. Rev Mod Phys 85: 135-196. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.85.135
    [138] Ribeiro RDC, Pal D, Jamieson D, et al. (2017) Temporary Single-Cell Coating for Bioprocessing with a Cationic Polymer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9: 12967-12974. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b16434
    [139] Kharchenko PV, Silberstein L, Scadden DT (2014) Bayesian approach to single-cell differential expression analysis. Nat Methods 11: 740-742. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2967
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Uday Chintapula, Tanmayee Chikate, Deepsundar Sahoo, Amie Kieu, Ingrid D. Guerrero Rodriguez, Kytai T. Nguyen, Daniel Trott, Immunomodulation in age‐related disorders and nanotechnology interventions, 2023, 15, 1939-5116, 10.1002/wnan.1840
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5812) PDF downloads(613) Cited by(1)

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog