
Plant probiotic bacteria are a versatile group of bacteria isolated from different environmental sources to improve plant productivity and immunity. The potential of plant probiotic-based formulations is successfully seen as growth enhancement in economically important plants. For instance, endophytic Bacillus species acted as plant growth-promoting bacteria, influenced crops such as cowpea and lady's finger, and increased phytochemicals in crops such as high antioxidant content in tomato fruits. The present review aims to summarize the studies of Bacillus species retaining probiotic properties and compare them with the conventional fertilizers on the market. Plant probiotics aim to take over the world since it is the time to rejuvenate and restore the soil and achieve sustainable development goals for the future. Comprehensive coverage of all the Bacillus species used to maintain plant health, promote plant growth, and fight against pathogens is crucial for establishing sustainable agriculture to face global change. Additionally, it will give the latest insight into this multifunctional agent with a detailed biocontrol mechanism and explore the antagonistic effects of Bacillus species in different crops.
Citation: Shubhra Singh, Douglas J. H. Shyu. Perspective on utilization of Bacillus species as plant probiotics for different crops in adverse conditions[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(1): 220-238. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024011
[1] | Esther Menendez, Paula Garcia-Fraile . Plant probiotic bacteria: solutions to feed the world. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 502-524. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.502 |
[2] | Alaa Fathalla, Amal Abd el-mageed . Salt tolerance enhancement Of wheat (Triticum Asativium L) genotypes by selected plant growth promoting bacteria. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(3): 250-271. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020016 |
[3] | Ananya Mukherjee, Puja Bhattacharjee, Rituparna Das, Arundhati Pal, Amal K. Paul . Endophytic bacteria with plant growth promoting abilities from Ophioglossum reticulatum L.. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 596-612. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.596 |
[4] | Luis R. Silva, Catarina Bento, Ana Carolina Gonçalves, José David Flores-Félix, Martha Helena Ramírez-Bahena, Alvaro Peix, Encarna Velázquez . Legume bioactive compounds: influence of rhizobial inoculation. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(2): 267-278. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.2.267 |
[5] | Luciana Porto de Souza Vandenberghe, Lina Marcela Blandon Garcia, Cristine Rodrigues, Marcela Cândido Camara, Gilberto Vinícius de Melo Pereira, Juliana de Oliveira, Carlos Ricardo Soccol . Potential applications of plant probiotic microorganisms in agriculture and forestry. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 629-648. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.629 |
[6] | Yulduzkhon Abdullaeva, Gulsanam Mardonova, Farkhod Eshboev, Massimiliano Cardinale, Dilfuza Egamberdieva . Harnessing chickpea bacterial endophytes for improved plant health and fitness. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(3): 489-506. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024024 |
[7] | Nilde Antonella Di Benedetto, Maria Rosaria Corbo, Daniela Campaniello, Mariagrazia Pia Cataldi, Antonio Bevilacqua, Milena Sinigaglia, Zina Flagella . The role of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria in improving nitrogen use efficiency for sustainable crop production: a focus on wheat. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 413-434. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.413 |
[8] | Rudoviko Galileya Medison, Litao Tan, Milca Banda Medison, Kenani Edward Chiwina . Use of beneficial bacterial endophytes: A practical strategy to achieve sustainable agriculture. AIMS Microbiology, 2022, 8(4): 624-643. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2022040 |
[9] | Monyck Jeane dos Santos Lopes, Aline Figueiredo Cardoso, Moacyr Bernardino Dias-Filho, Ely Simone Cajueiro Gurgel, Gisele Barata da Silva . Brazilian Amazonian microorganisms: A sustainable alternative for plant development. AIMS Microbiology, 2025, 11(1): 150-166. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2025008 |
[10] | Lorena Carro, Imen Nouioui . Taxonomy and systematics of plant probiotic bacteria in the genomic era. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 383-412. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.383 |
Plant probiotic bacteria are a versatile group of bacteria isolated from different environmental sources to improve plant productivity and immunity. The potential of plant probiotic-based formulations is successfully seen as growth enhancement in economically important plants. For instance, endophytic Bacillus species acted as plant growth-promoting bacteria, influenced crops such as cowpea and lady's finger, and increased phytochemicals in crops such as high antioxidant content in tomato fruits. The present review aims to summarize the studies of Bacillus species retaining probiotic properties and compare them with the conventional fertilizers on the market. Plant probiotics aim to take over the world since it is the time to rejuvenate and restore the soil and achieve sustainable development goals for the future. Comprehensive coverage of all the Bacillus species used to maintain plant health, promote plant growth, and fight against pathogens is crucial for establishing sustainable agriculture to face global change. Additionally, it will give the latest insight into this multifunctional agent with a detailed biocontrol mechanism and explore the antagonistic effects of Bacillus species in different crops.
Chemical fertilizers are widely used in current farming systems worldwide to meet the growing demand for food despite their high cost and severe harmful consequences for the environment and human health. Probiotics are living bacteria that provide the host with health benefits when given in sufficient doses. The term was initially used concerning the interactions of microorganisms with either animal or human hosts [1]. However, due to their wide availability and emerging technologies, researchers are interested in learning about the interaction of these beneficial microorganisms with plant growth and development. It is interesting to note that several studies show that probiotics could enhance crop production and improve foods' nutritional levels including antioxidant properties [2]. Therefore, these bacterial species are considered to belong to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). They are responsible for improving the health of plants and have been known as plant probiotics in recent years. Plant probiotics work through direct or indirect mechanisms at physiological levels. Plant-associated microorganisms are reported to enhance the solubilization of fixed phosphorus to available forms for improving plant yields. This term covers probiotic bacteria in the phylum, such as Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria [3]. This review focuses on the growth-promoting potential of Bacillus species involved in different crops to use these beneficial species as probiotics under biotic and abiotic stresses.
Gram-positive Bacillus species are common in nature and can be found in practically all environmental niches. Additionally, these species have been utilized to produce industrial, agricultural, and medical goods [4]. Chemical fertilizers and pesticides can be replaced with antagonistic bacterial strains as biofertilizers. They can offer fresh perspectives on improving plant growth and productivity in case of diseases or pest infestation. For example, a rhizospheric Bacillus strain native to Kerala, India, shows an antifungal effect towards Pythium myriotylum in addition to the chemical compound responsible for antifungal activity [5]. A rhizospheric B. subtilis strain isolated from Himalayan regions was found to produce the antifungal antibiotic iturin A, a lipopeptide which inhibited growth of the phytopathogenic fungi Fusarium oxysporum and Rhizoctonia solani [6],[7]. This strain could protect tomato plants from fungal diseases and increase fruit yield. Evidently, certain B. subtilis strains isolated from the rhizosphere of desert plants produced volatile organic compounds such as 2,3-butanediol, which induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis plants [7]. This triggered immunity against the bacterial leaf pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, reducing disease incidence. A strain of B. subtilis from potato rhizosphere showed ability to protect potatoes from common devastating scab disease caused by Streptomyces scabies by the production of lipopeptides surfactin and iturin A, which inhibited germination of the pathogen's spores [8]. Another endophytic strain of B. subtilis ME9 isolate from cassava showed a broad-spectrum antibacterial compound that inhibited bacterial leaf streak caused by Xanthomonas phaseoli pv. Manihotis, reducing disease severity and improving cassava yields [9]. Similarly, a plant growth-promoting B. subtilis strain obtained from semi-arid regions in Africa demonstrated salt stress tolerance and could mitigate the effects of salinity on sorghum growth through production of osmolytes and modulation of stress-responsive genes [10].
As mentioned, the mechanism behind the growth-promoting effects of B. subtilis is associated with probiotic properties such as biofilm formation. The biofilm formation of B. subtilis was regulated by specific genes in plant polysaccharides [11]. A biofilm-forming B. subtilis strain from Brazil was capable of solubilizing insoluble phosphorus in the soil and releasing it to promote increased growth and productivity in corn, wheat, and other plants in phosphorus-deficient soils [12]. These biofilms provide numerous beneficial effects that stimulate the growth and health of plants. One key mechanism is nitrogen fixation, whereby B. subtilis converts inert atmospheric nitrogen into a usable form of nitrogen that plants can incorporate for growth. The biofilms also solubilize insoluble phosphorus in the soil through organic acid production, making this important macronutrient plant available. Another growth-promoting effect is the biosynthesis of antimicrobial compounds by the biofilms that protect plants against infection by fungal, bacterial, and viral pathogens. Beyond direct nutrient contributions and pathogen defense, B. subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens biofilms also induce systemic resistance in plants, priming their innate immunity to fight off diseases more effectively [13],[14]. Therefore, Bacillus-based biofertilizers can be directly applied to the surface of the soil for the enhancement of the control of microbial growth of disease-causing pathogens. Moreover, the effects of the induction of a pest defense system and the increased availability of plant nutrients in rhizospheres were observed [15].
Bacillus species can promote growth and development in stressed conditions through complex mechanisms, which can be grouped into various modes of action, as mentioned in Figure 1 [15],[16]. Bacillus as plant probiotics have developed an arsenal of strategies to aid plants in withstanding stressful conditions that would otherwise inhibit growth and cause damage. As mentioned above, under stress such as drought, certain Bacillus strains provide drought resilience by synthesizing the stress hormone abscisic acid, which triggers adaptive water-conserving responses in plants like stomatal closure to reduce water loss through transpiration. They also form exopolysaccharide biofilms that help retain soil moisture and prevent desiccation [17]. For salinity tolerance, Bacillus equip plants through production of the enzyme, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase, which cleaves the ethylene precursor ACC to lower deleterious ethylene levels induced by high salts. It also facilitates osmolyte accumulation in plant cells to maintain turgor pressure and physiological functions when stressed by hyperosmotic conditions [18],[19]. In chilling temperatures, Bacillus sp. JC03 secrete volatile organic compounds such as auxin and strigolactone that systemically induce biomass accumulation in Arabidopsis, promoting plant growth. They also modulate the formation of protective ice nucleating proteins to prevent intracellular freezing and frost injury [20]. Finally, in high heat conditions, Bacillus strains HT1 to HT4 isolated from Saudi Arabia elicit the plant's own antioxidant systems to scavenge dangerous reactive oxygen species produced as a result of heat stress. They also synthesize beneficial heat shock proteins that confer protein stability and prevent misfolding when plants experience spikes in temperature [21]. Through these diverse mechanisms related to plant hormones, osmolytes, protective proteins and other compounds, Bacillus species provide plants the biological means to withstand adverse environmental conditions and continue thriving.
Therefore, as shown in the subsequent figure, biocontrol mechanisms of Bacillus species include a myriad of functions:
Biological nitrogen fixation
Stress-mediated enzymes, such as 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase, and extracellular enzymes for hydrolyzing the cell wall
Plant growth regulators, such as abscisic acid (ABA), cytokinins (CKs), gibberellic acid (GA), and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)
Siderophore production for the chelation of available iron in the rhizosphere
Micronutrient and macronutrient biosolubilization and biomineralization, especially converting insoluble phosphate precipitates to soluble forms
Biocontrol of plant pathogens by other mechanisms, such as antibiotics production, induced systemic resistance (ISR), quorum quenching, and microbial competition for metabolic niches within the rhizosphere
Agricultural soil structure improvement and contaminated soil bioremediation, such as toxic heavy metal species sequestration and xenobiotic compounds degradation
Abiotic stresses resistance enhancement
Nitrogen synthesis is essential for plant growth and development since forming amino acids and proteins is considered an important biochemical pathway for synthesizing the macronutrients for plants [23]. Specific organic molecules produced by some microorganisms, such as phytohormones, are involved in plant photomorphogenesis. However, some beneficial bacteria or probiotic species are involved in plant growth enhancement and disease resistance [24],[25]. For example, auxins are responsible for regulating bacterial communication and coordinating other functions of plants directly or indirectly, and some act as signaling molecules for bacterial communication. An auxin-producing Bacillus species WM13-24 and a B. amyloliquefaciens GB03 which were isolated from the rhizosphere of H. ammodendron were developed as biofertilizers. They were found to enhance the growth, fruit yield, and quality of Capsicum annuum with improvement in nitrogen content, enzyme activities, and biodiversity of viable bacteria for long-term effects [26].
Similarly, Bacillus megaterium with Azotobacter chroococcum are found to promote cucumber growth by producing cytokinins. Cytokinins are responsible for cytokinesis, vascular cambium sensitivity, root apical dominance, and vascular differentiation [27],[28]. Under stressed conditions, plants often produce ethylene that can inhibit specific processes that cause premature senescence, such as root elongation or nitrogen fixation in legumes. Some bacteria produce ACC amidase to hydrolyze ACC, the precursor molecule involved in the biosynthesis of ethylene. Therefore, these probiotic species lower ethylene levels and protect the plant from damage [2]. Plant growth and germination of seeds are affected by nutrient availability. Generally, root transporters are responsible for the absorption of soluble phosphorus and nitrogen forms from the soil. However, the rhizosphere is the bioavailable center for P and N [29]. Some effects of the beneficial Bacillus species and their bioactive components are shown in Table 1. Bacillus species can convert the complex forms or the precipitate forms of essential macronutrients to the available soluble forms for the plants during uptake by plant roots. Some of the reported strains of Bacillus pumilus and B. subtilis can positively fix available nitrogen, solubilize the phosphate, and produce auxins during in vitro studies [30],[31]. It is reported that Bacillus species have nifH gene and produce nitrogenase involved in nitrogen fixation to delay senescence and enhance plant growth and yield [30]. In the pursuit of sustainable agriculture, researchers are exploring innovative strategies to improve soil fertility and one promising eco-friendly approach involves the combination of biochar and beneficial microorganisms, such as B. subtilis SL-44. This synergistic approach not only addresses soil health but also contributes to increased agricultural productivity [57]. SL-44, also known for its antagonistic properties against fungi, presents an opportunity for the isolation, purification, and identification of antifungal proteins. Studies have elucidated the antifungal protein produced by B. subtilis SL-44 has potential application in addressing anti-fungal resistance in apple cultivation [58]. Subsequently, studies have found that the enhancement of chromium contamination can be remediated by SL-44 strain through the addition of humic acid (HA). The study also has suggested dual function of HA on SL-44 species in Cr (VI) reduction, augmentation of Cr (VI) complexation, adsorption, and electronic exchange reduction in the contaminated soil [59].
Types of species | Growth promoting characteristics | Bioactive metabolites/other contents | Inferences | Reference |
Bacillus sp. LKE15 | Increased shoot length, root length, and plant fresh weight of the oriental melon | Increased synthesis of chlorophyll and individual amino acids along with magnesium, potassium, and phosphorus content | Cell-free Bacillus sp. LKE15 on crop plants has excellent potential as an organic method of improving plant growth | [32] |
Bacillus sp. WG4 | Plant growth-promoting properties and antifungal effects against Pythium myriotylum | Pyrrolo [1,2-α] pyrazine-1,4-dione, hexahydro-3-(phenylmethyl) | Promising application as an antifungal plant probiotic agent alone or in combination with other agents like Trichoderma | [5] |
Bacillus subtilis BA-142, Bacillus megaterium-GC subgroup A. MFD-2 | Foliar application increased fruit length and mineral contents of tomato and cucumber fruit | none | Great potential to increase the yield, growth, and mineral contents of tomato and cucumber vegetable species | [33] |
Bacillus subtilis LDR2 | Promoting plant growth through improved colonization of beneficial microbes under drought stress in Trigonella plants | High levels of ACC deaminase and reduced ethylene concentrations | Beneficial for legumes cultivated in arid conditions | [34] |
Bacillus insolitus (strain MAS17), and Bacillus sp. (strains MAS617, MAS620 and MAS820) | Increased the dry matter yield of roots (149–527% increase) and shoots (85–281% increase), and the mass of RS (176–790% increase) in pot experiments | Exopolysaccharides (EPS) productions | EPS-producing bacteria could serve as a valuable tool for alleviating salinity stress in salt-sensitive plants | [35] |
Bacillus megaterium mj1212 | Increasing shoot length, root length, and fresh weight in mustard plants | Increased chlorophyll, sucrose, glucose, fructose, and amino acids content | Phosphate biofertilizer to improve the plant growth | [36] |
Bacillus methylotrophicus KE2 | Enhance shoot length, shoot fresh weight, and leaf width of lettuce | Increased gibberellins and indole acetic acid contents along with high nutritional content | A potential candidate for increasing nutritional contents | [37] |
Bacillus mojavensis | Increase the dry weight of root and shoot, chlorophyll content, and nutrient uptake in salt-stressed wheat plants | Bacteria containing ACC deaminase | Bacillus mojavensis could be an effective strain to promote the growth of wheat in saline soils | [38] |
Bacillus subtilis (HYT-12-1) | 37%-IAA production; 37%-phosphate solubilization; 24%-siderophores production; 85%-potential nitrogen fixation; 6%-ACC deaminase activity in tomato seeds |
High ACC deaminase activity in gnotobiotic and greenhouse conditions | B. subtilis strain HYT-12-1 would have great potential for industrial application as a biofertilizer in the future | [39] |
Bacillus sp. CaB5 | Enhancement effect on seed germination as well as plant growth in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and lady's finger (Abelmoschus esculentus) | None | Potential of CaB5-based formulation for field application to enhance the growth of economically important plants | [40] |
Bacillus vietnamensis | Plant growth and bud development with antifungal, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, and antibacterial activities in ginger rhizome against Pythium myriotylum | 2,4-bis (1,1-dimethylethyl) phenol | Biocontrol agent for Pythium rot in ginger as an alternative to fungicides | [41] |
Bacillus subtilis CBR05 | Increased total phenol and flavonoid contents of tomato fruits along with in tomato fruits | Stimulated antioxidant activities and levels of carotenoid (β-carotene and lycopene) content | Biofertilizers-based on PGPR may be a viable alternative to improve the nutraceutical quality of greenhouse-produced tomato fruits | [42] |
Bacillus cereus QJ-1 bio-organic fertilizer (BOF) | Reduces tobacco bacterial wilt disease and improves soil quality | High nitrogen, phosphorus, and organic matter in rhizosphere soils | BOF can improve the ecological stability of soils and mitigate tobacco bacterial wilt disease | [43] |
Bacillus biofortified organic fertilizer (BOF) | Disease incidence was lowest (10.7%) in BOF treatment when compared to OF (organic fertilizer) treatment (13.1%), along with an increase in the shoot and root length in tomato plants | None | Management of bacterial wilt disease under poly house conditions of Andaman Islands | [44] |
Bacillus cabrialesii BH5 | Control the fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea in tomato rhizosphere | Cyclic lipopeptide of the fengycin family | BH5 and fengycin H are up-and-coming candidates for biological control of B. cinerea and the associated gray mold | [45] |
Bacillus pumilus 104 | Inhibited the growth of Phytophthora nicotianae and P. palmivora in citrus trees | Antifungal properties with antimicrobial compounds | None | [46] |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Ba168 | Inhibited growth of blue mold caused by Penicillium expansum in apples | Flagellin an antifungal compound | Flagellin is one of the essential antimicrobial substances from Ba168 | [47] |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Ba01 | Inhibited the growth and sporulation of Streptomyces scabies in potatoes | Surfactin, iturin A, and fengycin | Bacillus species control potato common scab in nature | [48] |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 | Antibacterial activity against Xanthomonas oryzae rice pathogens | Difficidin and bacilysin | Environmentally friendly and versatile in their mode of action | [49] |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Ar10 | Antagonistic activity against bacterial soft rot of potato caused by Pectobacterium carotovorum II16 | Glycolipid-like compounds | Best alternatives for compounds against the soft rot disease of potato | [50] |
Bacillus subtilis V26 | Effective against root canker and black scurf Tuber (Rhizoctonia solani) on potato | Chitosanase and proteases | Great potential to be commercialized as a biocontrol agent | [51] |
Other mechanisms, such as cell wall modification, metabolic response changes, and gene expression alteration, occur during stressful conditions. Therefore, researchers focus on signaling molecules and expression analysis to downstream the bioactive metabolites and genes in plant-microbe interaction [52]. Quorum sensing involves cell-to-cell signaling mechanisms to regulate the pathogen population and virulence gene expression. It is considered a crucial process that enables host colonization and microbe survival under stressful situations [53]. Some microorganisms, such as B. cereus and B. thuringiensis, secrete volatile metabolites. These metabolites, such as alkyl sulfides, indoles, and terpenes, were involved in the quorum quenching mechanism, disrupt the signaling of the pathogens in the soil microbiome, and protect the plant from diseases such as soft rot in potatoes, carrots, etc. [54],[55]. Some microorganisms, such as Bacillus and Serratia synthesize pigments that have the ability to filter radiation to prevent the damage of nucleic acids under high light intensity [27]. Bacillus sp. uses a proton transfer system in the cytoplasm to maintain osmotic balance during pH fluctuation conditions. The regulation of cellular metabolite activities can control protein function, increase cellular vitality, and inhibit pathogen growth. Mechanisms such as solubilization, chelation, modifications, and oxidation-reduction reactions were commonly utilized [56].
Bacillus species can induce systemic resistance in plants and increase the uptake and translocation of pesticides in the plant cells of the root system to control pest infestations [60]. The bacterial infection starts with the release of crystal proteins to damage the larval midgut epithelium of the insects at the primary site, interacting with chitin and damaging the peritrophic membranes. For instance, B. thuringiensis Cry1 protein domain III damages the peritrophic membrane of Asian corn borer [61]. In addition, B. thuringiensis synthesized lipopeptides and polyketides in the later stages of infection. The compounds, such as bacillaene, bacillomycin, difficidin, fegycins, iturin, macrolactin, and surfactin, could modify the process of vacuolization, induce the formation of vesicles, cause the lysis of cell membranes, damage the microvilli, and subsequently lead to the death of larvae [51],[62]. In the cellular phospholipid bilayer, protein surfactin is attached to calcium receptors and changes the peptide composition, while iturin forms ion-conducting pores and increases cell membrane permeability [63]. Bacillus species suppress the pathogenic microbial populations that infect and cause diseases of plants, such as Pseudomonas savastanoi, Ralstonia solanacearum, and Xanthomonas axonopodis [64],[65]. Bacillus species form biofilm around the root surface and secret polyketides to destroy the membranes of pathogens and reduce diseases by changing the morphology of cell walls and then killing the pathogens [11],[35].
The viability of microbial consortia of the biofertilizer depends on the inoculation method applied. It influences the establishment of microbial populations in the rhizosphere along with the structure and function of microbial populations. Microcapsules have been studied as the best alternative to protection and controlled release [66]. The commonly used carrier materials include inorganic materials, such as charcoal, clay, compost, rock phosphate pellets, talc, vermiculite, and zeolite, and organic materials, such as diatomaceous earth, sawdust, rice bran, and wheat bran [16]. Proper formulation is key to a successful and effective biofertilizer. A comparative chart (Table 2) highlights the advantages of Bacillus-based biofertilizers over conventional chemical fertilizers:
Parameters | Bacillus-Based Biofertilizers | Conventional Chemical Fertilizers |
Nutrient Delivery | Provide nutrients through biological nitrogen fixation, P solubilization, phytohormone production | Provide inorganic forms of NPK only |
Soil Health | Improve soil structure, organic matter; no accumulation of salts or chemicals | Can degrade soil quality over time, salinization |
Environmental Impact | Eco-friendly, no toxic chemical residues | Leaching causes water pollution, eutrophication |
Effectiveness | Nutrients available over longer-term; activate soil microbiome | Nutrients easily leach away, may require frequent re-application |
Plant Growth | Promote extensive root development, stress tolerance | Primarily provides macronutrients only for growth |
Cost | Lower cost per acre over long term | Petroleum derived, energy intensive high cost over time |
Safety | No health risks; biopesticides improve food safety | Risk of toxic metal accumulation; pesticide residues |
Yield | Increased yields due to well-developed healthy plants | Lower yields over time as soil quality declines |
Regulatory Approval | Considered safe; no restrictive regulations | Subject to government health and safety regulations |
Natural carriers such as bacterial species must possess the capability of long-term viability; however, the nutrient competition makes it more challenging to adapt to certain micro-habitats. This natural selection among pathogens challenges the probiotic bio-based fertilizers [67]. In addition to the carrier materials, the inoculum density and the response of the plant towards the inoculators are highly influenced by root colonization that varies from bacterial division rate and distribution in the rhizospheres [66]. Another significant issue is acclimatization to the new environment, which leads to a decrease in the microorganism population. Accompanied by biotic and abiotic factors, it affects the structural and functional diversity of microorganism communities. In this manner, a study of the evaluation of probiotic inoculants towards site-specific plant associations could determine the fate and activity in the soil [68].
Organic farming is an integrated farming system where bacterial agents are considered eco-friendly and sustainable for increasing soil fertility and protecting plants against diseases [69]. Plant probiotic Bacillus species can promote organic farming and reduce farmers' dependence on chemical fertilizers and promote sustainable farming in modern agriculture. For instance, an alternative crop production technique was applied by the inoculation of both B. subtilis FZB24 and GB03 in corn (Zea mays L.) seedlings. They reduced the use of neonicotinoid insecticide thiamethoxam. Similar studies have been observed with the evaluation of using thiamethoxam in tomato crops [70]. The excretion of xylem fluid at leaf margins is called guttation, a natural phenomenon. Since the use of neonicotinoid systemic insecticides on seeds reduces the population of bees drastically and causes significant losses in the plant pollination phenomenon, the use of this particular chemical was banned by the European Union [71]. On the contrary, a well-known bio-insecticide, Bacillus thuringiensis, which works harmoniously with plants, is responsible for controlling a broad range of diverse insects for pest management in agricultural fields [72]. Some other examples are B. cereus, B. subtilis, and B. amyloliquefaciens, which are also involved in pest control and management [73].
There is a shred of clear evidence from previous studies that applying probiotics has long-term effects on crop productivity in terms of improving quality and quantity. However, due to their complex nature and lesser popularity, a solid application strategy is needed to promote the usage of probiotic bacteria consortiums in agriculture, especially in developing countries. Studies on the mode of action show antagonistic behavior towards pathogens, but the efficacy is decreased during cascades of physiological events (Figure 2). With the development of novel probiotic-based fertilizers, specific modes of action might be considered. In that case, robust screening of novel Bacillus species as probiotic strains with potential antimicrobial metabolites can be used. This screening method may work well with the superior kind of strains and the overall effects of the pathogen and disease. In terms of future research, a few aspects should be given immediate consideration:
Recommendation of precision probiotic bacteria fertilizer: The precision fertilizer, which is selected based on soil mineralogy and dynamics, is of utmost importance to improve crop yield and cost-effectiveness. Initially,
Crop quality consideration: Soil quality plays a vital role in the improvement of the quality of most crops. However, for precise and more accurate crop-responsive probiotic application, a suitable formulation might be used to investigate the dynamicity in the system, minimizing the use of chemical fertilizers and promoting organic agriculture for a sustainable environment. Moreover, public sector research institutions, fertilizer companies, and agriculture-based industries should work together to develop a research and awareness strategy for the promotion of probiotics bacteria in agriculture.
Multi-omics approach: better screening assays such as multi-omics inclusive of genomics, proteomics, and transcriptomics are required to find the next-generation probiotic strains among all the
Every year, commercial treatments concerning novel bacterial inoculants for different crops are growing. Government clearance for novel inoculants and formulations is not always universal and well-established; therefore, the commercialization process requires more attention. Additionally, the commercialization and registration of new products depend on the country [74], and rules and regulations vary according to the country. Until now, no international agreement on biofertilizer utilization and quality control in agricultural and horticultural industries has been established. According to most of the protocols established by North America, a novel formulation, including Bacillus species either using organic or inorganic carriers, must be safe and non-toxic for the environment and human health. Current commercial Bacillus sp. products are listed in Table 3 [75]–[77]. However, a few species, such as B. cereus, are considered pathogenic to humans and require clearance and registration for large-scale production [78],[79].
In conclusion, this perspective not only provides a synthesis of current knowledge on the utilization of Bacillus species in challenging agricultural environments but also serves as a catalyst for future research endeavors. The continued exploration of the intricate interactions between Bacillus species and plants holds promise for advancing our understanding of plant probiotics and their pivotal role in shaping the future of agriculture under adverse conditions.
Inoculators | Product | Plants | Viability | Company |
B. amyloliquefaciens, Bradyrhizobium japonicum | Nodulator® N/T Peat | Increase the yield of soybean | 24 hours on-seed survivability | BASF Canada Inc. |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bradyrhizobium japonicum | Nodulator® PRO 100 | Soybean fungicides | 24 hours on-seed survivability | BASF Canada Inc. |
Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | PrimAgro® C-Tech | Pest control in all types of crops | 6 months | Canadian Corporation |
Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | BioSoil Enhancers, Inc | Pest control in all types of crops | 6 months | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus subtilis, Trichoderma | BioSafe® Systems | Pest control in all types of crops | 6–8 months | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus subtilis | BioWorks® | Pest control in all types of crops | - | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus subtilis | Blacksmith Bioscience® | Pest control in all types of crops | 6 months | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus subtilis | Concentric Ag® | Pest control in all types of crops | 6 months | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas monteilii | Earth Alive® | Pest control in all types of crops | - | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | Impello Biosciences® | Pest control in all types of crops | - | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus subtilis | John and Bob's® | Pest control in all types of crops | - | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | Key to Life® | Pest control in all types of crops | - | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus subtilis | SCD Probiotics® | Pest control in all types of crops | - | Arizona Corporation |
The authors declare they have not used artificial intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
[1] |
Hamilton-Miller JMT, Gibson GR, Bruck W (2003) Some insights into the derivation and early uses of the word ‘probiotic’. Br J Nutr 90: 845-845. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN2003954 ![]() |
[2] |
Jiménez-Gómez A, Celador-Lera L, Fradejas-Bayón M, et al. (2017) Plant probiotic bacteria enhance the quality of fruit and horticultural crops. AIMS Microbiol 3: 483-501. https://doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.483 ![]() |
[3] |
Carro L, Nouioui I (2017) Taxonomy and systematics of plant probiotic bacteria in the genomic era. AIMS Microbiol 3: 383-412. https://doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.383 ![]() |
[4] | Yobo KS Utilisation of Bacillus spp. as Plant Probiotics (Doctoral dissertation) (2000). Available from: https://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/server/api/core/bitstreams/bc94cab8-4472-4cac-84cd-2129b55d3108/content |
[5] | Jimtha JC, Jishma P, Arathy GB, et al. (2016) Identification of plant growth promoting rhizosphere Bacillus sp. WG4 antagonistic to Pythium myriotylum and its enhanced antifungal effect in association with Trichoderma. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 16: 578-590. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162016005000026 |
[6] |
Miljaković D, Marinković J, Balešević-Tubić S (2020) The significance of Bacillus spp. In disease suppression and growth promotion of field and vegetable crops. Microorganisms 8: 1037. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8071037 ![]() |
[7] |
Hashem A, Tabassum B, Fathi Abd_Allah E (2019) Bacillus subtilis: A plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium that also impacts biotic stress. Saudi J Biol Sci 26: 1291-1297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.05.004 ![]() |
[8] |
Song J, Kong ZQ, Zhang DD, et al. (2021) Rhizosphere microbiomes of potato cultivated under Bacillus subtilis treatment influence the quality of potato tubers. Int J Mol Sci 22: 12065. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222112065 ![]() |
[9] | Feng Y, Zhang Y, Shah OU, et al. (2023) Isolation and identification of endophytic bacteria Bacillus sp. ME9 that exhibits biocontrol activity against Xanthomonas phaseoli pv. manihotis. Biology (Basel) 9: 1231. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12091231 |
[10] | Anckaert A, Arias AA, Hoff G (2021) The use of Bacillus spp. as bacterial biocontrol agents to control plant diseases. Burleigh Dodds Series In Agricultural Science. Cambridge: Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing. https://doi.org/10.19103/AS.2021.0093.10 |
[11] |
Beauregard PB, Chai Y, Vlamakis H, et al. (2013) Bacillus subtilis biofilm induction by plant polysaccharides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 1621-1630. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218984110 ![]() |
[12] |
Arnaouteli S, Bamford NC, Stanley-Wall NR, et al. (2021) Bacillus subtilis biofilm formation and social interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol 19: 600-614. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-021-00540-9 ![]() |
[13] |
Liu H, Prajapati V, Prajapati S, et al. (2021) Comparative genome analysis of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens focusing on phylogenomics, functional traits, and prevalence of antimicrobial and virulence genes. Front Genet 12: 724217. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.724217 ![]() |
[14] |
Huang Q, Zhang Z, Liu Q, et al. (2021) SpoVG is an important regulator of sporulation and affects biofilm formation by regulating Spo0A transcription in Bacillus cereus 0–9. BMC Microbiol 21: 172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02239-6 ![]() |
[15] |
García-Fraile P, Menéndez E, Rivas R (2015) Role of bacterial biofertilizers in agriculture and forestry. AIMS Bioeng 2: 183-205. https://doi.org/10.3934/bioeng.2015.3.183 ![]() |
[16] | Lopes MJ dos S, Dias-Filho MB, Gurgel ESC (2021) Successful plant growth-promoting microbes: Inoculation methods and abiotic factors. Front Sustain Food Syst 5: 656454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.606454 |
[17] |
Gahir S, Bharath P, Raghavendra AS (2021) Stomatal closure sets in motion long-term strategies of plant defense against microbial pathogens. Front Plant Sci 12: 761952. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.761952 ![]() |
[18] |
Herpell JB, Alickovic A, Diallo B, et al. (2023) Phyllosphere symbiont promotes plant growth through ACC deaminase production. ISME J 17: 1267-1277. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-023-01428-7 ![]() |
[19] | Orozco-Mosqueda M del C, Glick BR, Santoyo G (2020) ACC deaminase in plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB): An efficient mechanism to counter salt stress in crops. Microbiol Res 235: 126-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2020.126439 |
[20] |
Jiang CH, Xie YS, Zhu K, et al. (2019) Volatile organic compounds emitted by Bacillus sp. JC03 promote plant growth through the action of auxin and strigolactone. Plant Growth Regul 87: 317-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-018-00473-z ![]() |
[21] |
Hassan AHA, Hozzein WN, Mousa ASM, et al. (2020) Heat stress as an innovative approach to enhance the antioxidant production in Pseudooceanicola and Bacillus isolates. Sci Rep 10: 15076. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72054-y ![]() |
[22] |
Etesami H (2020) Plant-microbe interactions in plants and stress tolerance. Plant Life Under Changing Environment: Responses and Management. New York: Academic Press 355-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818204-8.00018-7 ![]() |
[23] | Maheshwari DK (2012) Bacteria in Agrobiology: Plant Probiotics. Switzerland: Springer Science & Business Media 325-363. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27515-9 |
[24] | Lavelle P, Spain AV (2002) Soil Ecology. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Nature BV. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48162-6 |
[25] |
Akhtar MS (2019) Salt Stress, Microbes, and Plant Interactions : Causes and Solution. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8801-9 ![]() |
[26] |
Yi J, Sheng G, Suo Z, et al. (2020) Biofertilizers with beneficial rhizobacteria improved plant growth and yield in chili (Capsicum annuum L.). World J Microbiol Biotechnol 36: 86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-020-02863-w ![]() |
[27] |
Varma A, Tripathi S, Prasad R (2020) Plant Microbe Symbiosis. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36248-5_1 ![]() |
[28] | Kutschera U, Khanna R (2016) Plant gnotobiology : Epiphytic microbes and sustainable agriculture. Plant SignalBehav 12: 1256529. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2016.1256529 |
[29] | Bidondo LF, Bompadre J, Pergola M, et al. (2012) Differential interaction between two Glomus intraradices strains and a phosphate solubilizing bacterium in maize rhizosphere. Pedobiologia-Int J Soil Biol 55: 227-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2012.04.001 |
[30] |
Kuan KB, Othman R, Rahim KA (2016) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria inoculation to enhance vegetative growth, nitrogen fixation and nitrogen remobilisation of maize under greenhouse conditions. PLoS ONE 11: e0152478. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152478 ![]() |
[31] | Chaves-Gómez JL, Chávez-Arias CC, Prado AMC, et al. (2021) Mixtures of biological control agents and organic additives improve physiological behavior in cape gooseberry plants under vascular wilt disease. Plants 10: 20-59. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102059 |
[32] | Kang SM, Radhakrishnan R, Lee KE, et al. (2015) Mechanism of plant growth promotion elicited by Bacillus sp. LKE15 in oriental melon. Acta Agric Scand Sect B Soil Plant Sci 65: 637-647. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2015.1040830 |
[33] | Dursun A, Ekinci M, Dönmez MF (2010) Effects of foliar application of plant growth promoting bacterium on chemical contents, yield and growth of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Pakistan J Bot 42: 3349-3356. https://www.pakbs.org/pjbot/PDFs/42(5)/PJB42(5)3349.pdf |
[34] |
Barnawal D, Maji D, Bharti N, et al. (2013) ACC deaminase-containing Bacillus subtilis reduces stress ethylene-induced damage and improves mycorrhizal colonization and rhizobial nodulation in Trigonella foenum-graecum under drought stress. J Plant Growth Regul 32: 809-822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-013-9347-3 ![]() |
[35] | Ashraf M, Hasnain S, Berge O, et al. (2004) Inoculating wheat seedlings with exopolysaccharide-producing bacteria restricts sodium uptake and stimulates plant growth under salt stress. Biol Fertil Soils 40: 157-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-004-0766-y |
[36] |
Kang SM, Radhakrishnan R, You YH, et al. (2014) Phosphate solubilizing Bacillus megaterium mj1212 regulates endogenous plant carbohydrates and amino acids contents to promote mustard plant growth. Indian J Microbiol 54: 427-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-014-0476-6 ![]() |
[37] |
Radhakrishnan R, Lee IJ (2016) Gibberellins producing Bacillus methylotrophicus KE2 supports plant growth and enhances nutritional metabolites and food values of lettuce. Plant Physiol Biochem 109: 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.09.018 ![]() |
[38] | Pourbabaee AA, Bahmani E, Alikhani HA, et al. (2016) Promotion of wheat growth under salt stress by halotolerant bacteria containing ACC deaminase. J Agric Sci Technol 18: 855-864. https://jast.modares.ac.ir/article-23-11250-en.pdf |
[39] |
Xu M, Sheng J, Chen L, et al. (2014) Bacterial community compositions of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) seeds and plant growth promoting activity of ACC deaminase producing Bacillus subtilis (HYT-12-1) on tomato seedlings. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 30: 835-845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-013-1486-y ![]() |
[40] |
Basheer J, Ravi A, Mathew J, et al. (2019) Assessment of plant-probiotic performance of novel endophytic Bacillus sp. in talc-based formulation. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 11: 256-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-018-9386-y ![]() |
[41] |
John C J, GE M, Noushad N (2021) Probiotic rhizospheric Bacillus sp. from Zingiber officinale Rosc. displays antifungal activity against soft rot pathogen Pythium sp. Curr Plant Biol 27: 100217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2021.100217 ![]() |
[42] |
Chandrasekaran M, Chun SC, Oh JW, et al. (2019) Bacillus subtilis CBR05 for tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fruits in South Korea as a novel plant probiotic bacterium (PPB): Implications from total phenolics, flavonoids, and carotenoids content for fruit quality. Agronomy 9: 838. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9120838 ![]() |
[43] |
Wu X, Li H, Wang Y, et al. (2020) Effects of bio-organic fertiliser fortified by Bacillus cereus QJ-1 on tobacco bacterial wilt control and soil quality improvement. Biocontrol Sci Technol 30: 351-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2020.1711870 ![]() |
[44] | Subramani T, Krishnan S, Kaari M, et al. (2017) Efficacy of Bacillus-fortified organic fertilizer for controlling bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) of tomato under protected cultivation in the tropical Islands. Ecol Environ Conserv 23: 968-972. |
[45] |
Zhou L, Song C, Muñoz CY, et al. (2021) Bacillus cabrialesii BH5 protects tomato plants against Botrytis cinerea by production of specific antifungal compounds. Front Microbiol 12: 707609. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.707609 ![]() |
[46] |
Riera N, Handique U, Zhang Y, et al. (2017) Characterization of antimicrobial-producing beneficial bacteria isolated from Huanglongbing escape citrus trees. Front Microbiol 8: 2415. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02415 ![]() |
[47] |
Lu M, Chen Y, Li L, et al. (2022) Analysis and evaluation of the flagellin activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Ba168 antimicrobial proteins against Penicillium expansum. Molecules 27: 4259. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27134259 ![]() |
[48] |
Lin C, Tsai CH, Chen PY, et al. (2018) Biological control of potato common scab by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Ba01. PLoS One 13: e0196520. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196520 ![]() |
[49] |
Wu L, Wu H, Chen L, et al. (2015) Difficidin and bacilysin from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 have antibacterial activity against Xanthomonas oryzae rice pathogens. Sci Rep 5: 12975. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12975 ![]() |
[50] |
Azaiez S, Ben Slimene I, Karkouch I, et al. (2018) Biological control of the soft rot bacterium Pectobacterium carotovorum by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain Ar10 producing glycolipid-like compounds. Microbiol Res 217: 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2018.08.013 ![]() |
[51] |
Ben S, Kilani-feki O, Dammak M, et al. (2015) Efficacy of Bacillus subtilis V26 as a biological control agent against Rhizoctonia solani on potato. Comptes Rendus Biol 338: 784-792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2015.09.005 ![]() |
[52] |
Parmar A, Sharma S (2018) Engineering design and mechanistic mathematical models: Standpoint on cutting edge drug delivery. Trends Anal Chem 100: 15-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2017.12.008 ![]() |
[53] |
Uroz S, Dessaux Y, Oger P (2009) Quorum sensing and quorum quenching: The Yin and Yang of bacterial communication. ChemBioChem 10: 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.200800521 ![]() |
[54] | Khoiri S, Damayanti TA, Giyanto G (2017) Identification of quorum quenching bacteria and its biocontrol potential against soft rot disease bacteria, Dickeya dadantii. Agrivita 39: 45-55. http://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v39i1.633 |
[55] |
Chong TM, Koh CL, Sam CK, et al. (2012) Characterization of quorum sensing and quorum quenching soil bacteria isolated from Malaysian tropical montane forest. Sensors 12: 4846-4859. https://doi.org/10.3390/s120404846 ![]() |
[56] |
Van Oosten MJ, Pepe O, De Pascale S, et al. (2017) The role of biostimulants and bioeffectors as alleviators of abiotic stress in crop plants. Chem Biol Technol Agric 4: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-017-0089-5 ![]() |
[57] | Chen W, Wu Z, Liu C, et al. (2023) Biochar combined with Bacillus subtilis SL-44 as an eco-friendly strategy to improve soil fertility, reduce Fusarium wilt, and promote radish growth. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 251: 114-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.114509 |
[58] |
Chen W, Wu Z, He Y (2023) Isolation, purification, and identification of antifungal protein produced by Bacillus subtilis SL-44 and anti-fungal resistance in apple. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30: 62080-62093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26158-3 ![]() |
[59] |
Li T, He Y, Wang J, et al. (2023) Bioreduction of hexavalent chromium via Bacillus subtilis SL-44 enhanced by humic acid: An effective strategy for detoxification and immobilization of chromium. Sci Total Environ 888: 164246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164246 ![]() |
[60] | Papadopoulou-mourkidou E (2014) Effect of specific plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on growth and uptake of neonicotinoid insecticide thiamethoxam in corn (Zea mays L.) seedlings. Pest Manag Sci 70: 1156-1304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3919 |
[61] |
Feng D, Chen Z, Wang Z, et al. (2015) Domain III of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ie toxin plays an important role in binding to peritrophic membrane of Asian corn borer. PLoS One 10: e0136430. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136430 ![]() |
[62] |
Benfarhat-touzri D, Amira A Ben, Ben S, et al. (2014) Combinatorial effect of Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki and Photorhabdus luminescens against Spodoptera littoralis ( Lepidoptera: Noctuidae ). J Basic Microbiol 54: 1160-1165. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201300142 ![]() |
[63] |
Maget-dana R, Peypoux F (1993) Iturins, a special class of pore-forming lipopeptides: Biological and physicochemical properties. Toxicology 87: 151-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-483x(94)90159-7 ![]() |
[64] | Dash S, Murthy PN, Nath L, et al. (2010) Kinetic modeling on drug release from controlled drug delivery systems. Acta Pol Pharm-Drug Res 67: 217-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-483X(94)90159-7 |
[65] |
Krid S, Triki MA, Gargouri A, et al. (2012) Biocontrol of olive knot disease by Bacillus subtilis isolated from olive leaves. Ann Microbiol 62: 149-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-011-0239-0 ![]() |
[66] |
Hernández-Montiel LG, Chiquito-Contreras CJ, Murillo-Amador B, et al. (2017) Efficiency of two inoculation methods of Pseudomonas putida on growth and yield of tomato plants. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 17: 1003-1012. http://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162017000400012 ![]() |
[67] |
Seibold A, Fried A, Kunz S, et al. (2004) Yeasts as antagonists against fireblight. EPPO Bull 34: 389-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.2004.00766.x ![]() |
[68] |
de Souza R, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LMP (2015) Plant growth-promoting bacteria as inoculants in agricultural soils. Genet Mol Biol 38: 401-419. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-475738420150053 ![]() |
[69] |
Dihazi A, Jaiti F, Jaoua S, et al. (2012) Use of two bacteria for biological control of bayoud disease caused by Fusarium oxysporum in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) seedlings. Plant Physiol Biochem 55: 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.03.00370 ![]() |
[70] |
Karmakar R, Kulshrestha G (2009) Persistence, metabolism and safety evaluation of thiamethoxam in tomato crop. Pest Manag Sci 65: 931-937. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1776 ![]() |
[71] |
Girolami V, Mazzon L, Squartini A, et al. (2009) Translocation of neonicotinoid insecticides from coated seeds to seedling guttation drops : A novel way of intoxication for bees. J Econ Entomol 102: 1808-1815. https://doi.org/10.1603/029.102.0511 ![]() |
[72] |
Navon A (2000) Bacillus thuringiensis insecticides in crop protection- reality and prospects. Crop Prot 19: 669-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00089-2 ![]() |
[73] |
Gadhave KR, Gange AC (2016) Plant-associated Bacillus spp. alter life-history traits of the specialist insect Brevicoryne brassicae L. Agric For Entomol 18: 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/afe.12131 ![]() |
[74] |
Menéndez E, Paço A (2020) Is the application of plant probiotic bacterial consortia always beneficial for plants? Exploring synergies between rhizobial and non-rhizobial bacteria and their effects on agro-economically valuable crops. Life 10: 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/life10030024 ![]() |
[75] | ARBICO Organics 2023. Available from: https://www.arbico-organics.com/category/bacillus-subtilis-products |
[76] | Agroliquid Biofertilizers 2023. Available from: https://www.agroliquid.com/products/biofertilizers/ |
[77] | BASF corporation 2023. Available from: https://agriculture.basf.ca/east/en/products.html?cs_filters=indication_type%7CInoculants |
[78] |
Chauhan H, Bagyaraj DJ, Selvakumar G, et al. (2015) Novel plant growth promoting rhizobacteria-Prospects and potential. Appl Soil Ecol 95: 38-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.05.011 ![]() |
[79] | Lesueur D, Deaker R, Herrmann L, et al. (2016) The production and potential of biofertilizers to improve crop yields. Bioformulations: for Sustainable Agriculture. Berlin: Springer 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2779-3_4 |
1. | Ugur Azizoglu, Leandris Argentel‐Martínez, Ofelda Peñuelas‐Rubio, Angélica Herrera‐Sepúlveda, Jerald Conrad Ibal, Reza Sharafi, Gholamreza Salehi Jouzani, Aurelio Ortiz, Jessica Vaca, Estibaliz Sansinenea, Natural Products Produced by the Species of Bacillus cereus Group: Recent Updates, 2024, 0233-111X, 10.1002/jobm.202400666 | |
2. | Gholamreza Salehi Jouzani, Reza Sharafi, Leandris Argentel-Martínez, Ofelda Peñuelas-Rubio, Ceyda Ozkan, Bengisu Incegul, Rana Goksu, Zehra Hayta, Deniz Yilki, Beyza Yazici, Vildan Hancer, Estibaliz Sansinenea, Jae-Ho Shin, A. El-Shabasy, Ugur Azizoglu, Novel insights into Bacillus thuringiensis: Beyond its role as a bioinsecticide, 2024, 09232508, 104264, 10.1016/j.resmic.2024.104264 | |
3. | Wenli Sun, Mohamad Hesam Shahrajabian, Biostimulant and Beyond: Bacillus spp., the Important Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR)-Based Biostimulant for Sustainable Agriculture, 2025, 2509-9426, 10.1007/s41748-024-00552-4 | |
4. | Aneta Buntić, Olivera Stajković-Srbinović, Mila Pešić, Zoran Dinić, Mira Milinković, Magdalena Knežević, Improvement of yield and nutrient composition of orchardgrass in soils with increased nickel concentration by inoculation with Bacillus strains, 2024, 73, 0514-6658, 14, 10.5937/ZemBilj2402014B |
Types of species | Growth promoting characteristics | Bioactive metabolites/other contents | Inferences | Reference |
Bacillus sp. LKE15 | Increased shoot length, root length, and plant fresh weight of the oriental melon | Increased synthesis of chlorophyll and individual amino acids along with magnesium, potassium, and phosphorus content | Cell-free Bacillus sp. LKE15 on crop plants has excellent potential as an organic method of improving plant growth | [32] |
Bacillus sp. WG4 | Plant growth-promoting properties and antifungal effects against Pythium myriotylum | Pyrrolo [1,2-α] pyrazine-1,4-dione, hexahydro-3-(phenylmethyl) | Promising application as an antifungal plant probiotic agent alone or in combination with other agents like Trichoderma | [5] |
Bacillus subtilis BA-142, Bacillus megaterium-GC subgroup A. MFD-2 | Foliar application increased fruit length and mineral contents of tomato and cucumber fruit | none | Great potential to increase the yield, growth, and mineral contents of tomato and cucumber vegetable species | [33] |
Bacillus subtilis LDR2 | Promoting plant growth through improved colonization of beneficial microbes under drought stress in Trigonella plants | High levels of ACC deaminase and reduced ethylene concentrations | Beneficial for legumes cultivated in arid conditions | [34] |
Bacillus insolitus (strain MAS17), and Bacillus sp. (strains MAS617, MAS620 and MAS820) | Increased the dry matter yield of roots (149–527% increase) and shoots (85–281% increase), and the mass of RS (176–790% increase) in pot experiments | Exopolysaccharides (EPS) productions | EPS-producing bacteria could serve as a valuable tool for alleviating salinity stress in salt-sensitive plants | [35] |
Bacillus megaterium mj1212 | Increasing shoot length, root length, and fresh weight in mustard plants | Increased chlorophyll, sucrose, glucose, fructose, and amino acids content | Phosphate biofertilizer to improve the plant growth | [36] |
Bacillus methylotrophicus KE2 | Enhance shoot length, shoot fresh weight, and leaf width of lettuce | Increased gibberellins and indole acetic acid contents along with high nutritional content | A potential candidate for increasing nutritional contents | [37] |
Bacillus mojavensis | Increase the dry weight of root and shoot, chlorophyll content, and nutrient uptake in salt-stressed wheat plants | Bacteria containing ACC deaminase | Bacillus mojavensis could be an effective strain to promote the growth of wheat in saline soils | [38] |
Bacillus subtilis (HYT-12-1) | 37%-IAA production; 37%-phosphate solubilization; 24%-siderophores production; 85%-potential nitrogen fixation; 6%-ACC deaminase activity in tomato seeds |
High ACC deaminase activity in gnotobiotic and greenhouse conditions | B. subtilis strain HYT-12-1 would have great potential for industrial application as a biofertilizer in the future | [39] |
Bacillus sp. CaB5 | Enhancement effect on seed germination as well as plant growth in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and lady's finger (Abelmoschus esculentus) | None | Potential of CaB5-based formulation for field application to enhance the growth of economically important plants | [40] |
Bacillus vietnamensis | Plant growth and bud development with antifungal, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, and antibacterial activities in ginger rhizome against Pythium myriotylum | 2,4-bis (1,1-dimethylethyl) phenol | Biocontrol agent for Pythium rot in ginger as an alternative to fungicides | [41] |
Bacillus subtilis CBR05 | Increased total phenol and flavonoid contents of tomato fruits along with in tomato fruits | Stimulated antioxidant activities and levels of carotenoid (β-carotene and lycopene) content | Biofertilizers-based on PGPR may be a viable alternative to improve the nutraceutical quality of greenhouse-produced tomato fruits | [42] |
Bacillus cereus QJ-1 bio-organic fertilizer (BOF) | Reduces tobacco bacterial wilt disease and improves soil quality | High nitrogen, phosphorus, and organic matter in rhizosphere soils | BOF can improve the ecological stability of soils and mitigate tobacco bacterial wilt disease | [43] |
Bacillus biofortified organic fertilizer (BOF) | Disease incidence was lowest (10.7%) in BOF treatment when compared to OF (organic fertilizer) treatment (13.1%), along with an increase in the shoot and root length in tomato plants | None | Management of bacterial wilt disease under poly house conditions of Andaman Islands | [44] |
Bacillus cabrialesii BH5 | Control the fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea in tomato rhizosphere | Cyclic lipopeptide of the fengycin family | BH5 and fengycin H are up-and-coming candidates for biological control of B. cinerea and the associated gray mold | [45] |
Bacillus pumilus 104 | Inhibited the growth of Phytophthora nicotianae and P. palmivora in citrus trees | Antifungal properties with antimicrobial compounds | None | [46] |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Ba168 | Inhibited growth of blue mold caused by Penicillium expansum in apples | Flagellin an antifungal compound | Flagellin is one of the essential antimicrobial substances from Ba168 | [47] |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Ba01 | Inhibited the growth and sporulation of Streptomyces scabies in potatoes | Surfactin, iturin A, and fengycin | Bacillus species control potato common scab in nature | [48] |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 | Antibacterial activity against Xanthomonas oryzae rice pathogens | Difficidin and bacilysin | Environmentally friendly and versatile in their mode of action | [49] |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Ar10 | Antagonistic activity against bacterial soft rot of potato caused by Pectobacterium carotovorum II16 | Glycolipid-like compounds | Best alternatives for compounds against the soft rot disease of potato | [50] |
Bacillus subtilis V26 | Effective against root canker and black scurf Tuber (Rhizoctonia solani) on potato | Chitosanase and proteases | Great potential to be commercialized as a biocontrol agent | [51] |
Parameters | Bacillus-Based Biofertilizers | Conventional Chemical Fertilizers |
Nutrient Delivery | Provide nutrients through biological nitrogen fixation, P solubilization, phytohormone production | Provide inorganic forms of NPK only |
Soil Health | Improve soil structure, organic matter; no accumulation of salts or chemicals | Can degrade soil quality over time, salinization |
Environmental Impact | Eco-friendly, no toxic chemical residues | Leaching causes water pollution, eutrophication |
Effectiveness | Nutrients available over longer-term; activate soil microbiome | Nutrients easily leach away, may require frequent re-application |
Plant Growth | Promote extensive root development, stress tolerance | Primarily provides macronutrients only for growth |
Cost | Lower cost per acre over long term | Petroleum derived, energy intensive high cost over time |
Safety | No health risks; biopesticides improve food safety | Risk of toxic metal accumulation; pesticide residues |
Yield | Increased yields due to well-developed healthy plants | Lower yields over time as soil quality declines |
Regulatory Approval | Considered safe; no restrictive regulations | Subject to government health and safety regulations |
Inoculators | Product | Plants | Viability | Company |
B. amyloliquefaciens, Bradyrhizobium japonicum | Nodulator® N/T Peat | Increase the yield of soybean | 24 hours on-seed survivability | BASF Canada Inc. |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bradyrhizobium japonicum | Nodulator® PRO 100 | Soybean fungicides | 24 hours on-seed survivability | BASF Canada Inc. |
Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | PrimAgro® C-Tech | Pest control in all types of crops | 6 months | Canadian Corporation |
Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | BioSoil Enhancers, Inc | Pest control in all types of crops | 6 months | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus subtilis, Trichoderma | BioSafe® Systems | Pest control in all types of crops | 6–8 months | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus subtilis | BioWorks® | Pest control in all types of crops | - | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus subtilis | Blacksmith Bioscience® | Pest control in all types of crops | 6 months | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus subtilis | Concentric Ag® | Pest control in all types of crops | 6 months | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas monteilii | Earth Alive® | Pest control in all types of crops | - | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | Impello Biosciences® | Pest control in all types of crops | - | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus subtilis | John and Bob's® | Pest control in all types of crops | - | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | Key to Life® | Pest control in all types of crops | - | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus subtilis | SCD Probiotics® | Pest control in all types of crops | - | Arizona Corporation |
Types of species | Growth promoting characteristics | Bioactive metabolites/other contents | Inferences | Reference |
Bacillus sp. LKE15 | Increased shoot length, root length, and plant fresh weight of the oriental melon | Increased synthesis of chlorophyll and individual amino acids along with magnesium, potassium, and phosphorus content | Cell-free Bacillus sp. LKE15 on crop plants has excellent potential as an organic method of improving plant growth | [32] |
Bacillus sp. WG4 | Plant growth-promoting properties and antifungal effects against Pythium myriotylum | Pyrrolo [1,2-α] pyrazine-1,4-dione, hexahydro-3-(phenylmethyl) | Promising application as an antifungal plant probiotic agent alone or in combination with other agents like Trichoderma | [5] |
Bacillus subtilis BA-142, Bacillus megaterium-GC subgroup A. MFD-2 | Foliar application increased fruit length and mineral contents of tomato and cucumber fruit | none | Great potential to increase the yield, growth, and mineral contents of tomato and cucumber vegetable species | [33] |
Bacillus subtilis LDR2 | Promoting plant growth through improved colonization of beneficial microbes under drought stress in Trigonella plants | High levels of ACC deaminase and reduced ethylene concentrations | Beneficial for legumes cultivated in arid conditions | [34] |
Bacillus insolitus (strain MAS17), and Bacillus sp. (strains MAS617, MAS620 and MAS820) | Increased the dry matter yield of roots (149–527% increase) and shoots (85–281% increase), and the mass of RS (176–790% increase) in pot experiments | Exopolysaccharides (EPS) productions | EPS-producing bacteria could serve as a valuable tool for alleviating salinity stress in salt-sensitive plants | [35] |
Bacillus megaterium mj1212 | Increasing shoot length, root length, and fresh weight in mustard plants | Increased chlorophyll, sucrose, glucose, fructose, and amino acids content | Phosphate biofertilizer to improve the plant growth | [36] |
Bacillus methylotrophicus KE2 | Enhance shoot length, shoot fresh weight, and leaf width of lettuce | Increased gibberellins and indole acetic acid contents along with high nutritional content | A potential candidate for increasing nutritional contents | [37] |
Bacillus mojavensis | Increase the dry weight of root and shoot, chlorophyll content, and nutrient uptake in salt-stressed wheat plants | Bacteria containing ACC deaminase | Bacillus mojavensis could be an effective strain to promote the growth of wheat in saline soils | [38] |
Bacillus subtilis (HYT-12-1) | 37%-IAA production; 37%-phosphate solubilization; 24%-siderophores production; 85%-potential nitrogen fixation; 6%-ACC deaminase activity in tomato seeds |
High ACC deaminase activity in gnotobiotic and greenhouse conditions | B. subtilis strain HYT-12-1 would have great potential for industrial application as a biofertilizer in the future | [39] |
Bacillus sp. CaB5 | Enhancement effect on seed germination as well as plant growth in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and lady's finger (Abelmoschus esculentus) | None | Potential of CaB5-based formulation for field application to enhance the growth of economically important plants | [40] |
Bacillus vietnamensis | Plant growth and bud development with antifungal, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, and antibacterial activities in ginger rhizome against Pythium myriotylum | 2,4-bis (1,1-dimethylethyl) phenol | Biocontrol agent for Pythium rot in ginger as an alternative to fungicides | [41] |
Bacillus subtilis CBR05 | Increased total phenol and flavonoid contents of tomato fruits along with in tomato fruits | Stimulated antioxidant activities and levels of carotenoid (β-carotene and lycopene) content | Biofertilizers-based on PGPR may be a viable alternative to improve the nutraceutical quality of greenhouse-produced tomato fruits | [42] |
Bacillus cereus QJ-1 bio-organic fertilizer (BOF) | Reduces tobacco bacterial wilt disease and improves soil quality | High nitrogen, phosphorus, and organic matter in rhizosphere soils | BOF can improve the ecological stability of soils and mitigate tobacco bacterial wilt disease | [43] |
Bacillus biofortified organic fertilizer (BOF) | Disease incidence was lowest (10.7%) in BOF treatment when compared to OF (organic fertilizer) treatment (13.1%), along with an increase in the shoot and root length in tomato plants | None | Management of bacterial wilt disease under poly house conditions of Andaman Islands | [44] |
Bacillus cabrialesii BH5 | Control the fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea in tomato rhizosphere | Cyclic lipopeptide of the fengycin family | BH5 and fengycin H are up-and-coming candidates for biological control of B. cinerea and the associated gray mold | [45] |
Bacillus pumilus 104 | Inhibited the growth of Phytophthora nicotianae and P. palmivora in citrus trees | Antifungal properties with antimicrobial compounds | None | [46] |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Ba168 | Inhibited growth of blue mold caused by Penicillium expansum in apples | Flagellin an antifungal compound | Flagellin is one of the essential antimicrobial substances from Ba168 | [47] |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Ba01 | Inhibited the growth and sporulation of Streptomyces scabies in potatoes | Surfactin, iturin A, and fengycin | Bacillus species control potato common scab in nature | [48] |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 | Antibacterial activity against Xanthomonas oryzae rice pathogens | Difficidin and bacilysin | Environmentally friendly and versatile in their mode of action | [49] |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Ar10 | Antagonistic activity against bacterial soft rot of potato caused by Pectobacterium carotovorum II16 | Glycolipid-like compounds | Best alternatives for compounds against the soft rot disease of potato | [50] |
Bacillus subtilis V26 | Effective against root canker and black scurf Tuber (Rhizoctonia solani) on potato | Chitosanase and proteases | Great potential to be commercialized as a biocontrol agent | [51] |
Parameters | Bacillus-Based Biofertilizers | Conventional Chemical Fertilizers |
Nutrient Delivery | Provide nutrients through biological nitrogen fixation, P solubilization, phytohormone production | Provide inorganic forms of NPK only |
Soil Health | Improve soil structure, organic matter; no accumulation of salts or chemicals | Can degrade soil quality over time, salinization |
Environmental Impact | Eco-friendly, no toxic chemical residues | Leaching causes water pollution, eutrophication |
Effectiveness | Nutrients available over longer-term; activate soil microbiome | Nutrients easily leach away, may require frequent re-application |
Plant Growth | Promote extensive root development, stress tolerance | Primarily provides macronutrients only for growth |
Cost | Lower cost per acre over long term | Petroleum derived, energy intensive high cost over time |
Safety | No health risks; biopesticides improve food safety | Risk of toxic metal accumulation; pesticide residues |
Yield | Increased yields due to well-developed healthy plants | Lower yields over time as soil quality declines |
Regulatory Approval | Considered safe; no restrictive regulations | Subject to government health and safety regulations |
Inoculators | Product | Plants | Viability | Company |
B. amyloliquefaciens, Bradyrhizobium japonicum | Nodulator® N/T Peat | Increase the yield of soybean | 24 hours on-seed survivability | BASF Canada Inc. |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bradyrhizobium japonicum | Nodulator® PRO 100 | Soybean fungicides | 24 hours on-seed survivability | BASF Canada Inc. |
Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | PrimAgro® C-Tech | Pest control in all types of crops | 6 months | Canadian Corporation |
Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | BioSoil Enhancers, Inc | Pest control in all types of crops | 6 months | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus subtilis, Trichoderma | BioSafe® Systems | Pest control in all types of crops | 6–8 months | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus subtilis | BioWorks® | Pest control in all types of crops | - | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus subtilis | Blacksmith Bioscience® | Pest control in all types of crops | 6 months | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus subtilis | Concentric Ag® | Pest control in all types of crops | 6 months | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas monteilii | Earth Alive® | Pest control in all types of crops | - | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | Impello Biosciences® | Pest control in all types of crops | - | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus subtilis | John and Bob's® | Pest control in all types of crops | - | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | Key to Life® | Pest control in all types of crops | - | Arizona Corporation |
Bacillus subtilis | SCD Probiotics® | Pest control in all types of crops | - | Arizona Corporation |