Let $ X $ be a compact Riemann surface of genus $ g\geq 2 $. The moduli space $ \mathcal{M}(r, d) $ of rank $ r $ and degree $ d $ semi-stable Higgs bundles over $ X $ admitted a stratification, called Shatz stratification, which was defined by the Harder-Narasimhan type of the Higgs bundles. There was also a $ \mathbb{C}^* $-action on $ \mathcal{M}(r, d) $ given by the product on the Higgs field, which provided the Białynicki-Birula stratification by considering the Hodge limit bundles $ \lim_{z\to 0}(E, z\cdot\varphi) $. In this paper, these limit bundles were computed for all possible Harder-Narasimhan types when the rank of the Higgs bundles was $ r = 5 $, explicit vector forms were provided for the Hodge limit bundles, and necessary and sufficient conditions were given for them to be stable. In addition, it was proved that, in rank $ 5 $, the Shatz strata traversed the Białynicki-Birula strata. Specifically, it was checked that there existed different semi-stable rank $ 5 $ Higgs bundles with the same Harder-Narasimhan type such that their associated Hodge limit bundles were not S-equivalent, and explicit constructions of those Higgs bundles were also provided.
Citation: Álvaro Antón-Sancho. The $ \mathbb{C}^* $-action and stratifications of the moduli space of semi-stable Higgs bundles of rank $ 5 $[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 3428-3456. doi: 10.3934/math.2025159
Let $ X $ be a compact Riemann surface of genus $ g\geq 2 $. The moduli space $ \mathcal{M}(r, d) $ of rank $ r $ and degree $ d $ semi-stable Higgs bundles over $ X $ admitted a stratification, called Shatz stratification, which was defined by the Harder-Narasimhan type of the Higgs bundles. There was also a $ \mathbb{C}^* $-action on $ \mathcal{M}(r, d) $ given by the product on the Higgs field, which provided the Białynicki-Birula stratification by considering the Hodge limit bundles $ \lim_{z\to 0}(E, z\cdot\varphi) $. In this paper, these limit bundles were computed for all possible Harder-Narasimhan types when the rank of the Higgs bundles was $ r = 5 $, explicit vector forms were provided for the Hodge limit bundles, and necessary and sufficient conditions were given for them to be stable. In addition, it was proved that, in rank $ 5 $, the Shatz strata traversed the Białynicki-Birula strata. Specifically, it was checked that there existed different semi-stable rank $ 5 $ Higgs bundles with the same Harder-Narasimhan type such that their associated Hodge limit bundles were not S-equivalent, and explicit constructions of those Higgs bundles were also provided.
[1] |
L. B. Anderson, L. Fredrickson, M. Esole, L. P. Shaposnick, Singular geometry and Higgs bundles in string theory, SIGMA, 14 (2018), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2018.037 doi: 10.3842/SIGMA.2018.037
![]() |
[2] |
Á. Antón-Sancho, Shatz and Białynicki-Birula stratifications of the moduli space of Higgs bundles, Hokkaido Math. J., 51 (2022), 25–56. https://doi.org/10.14492/hokmj/2019-202 doi: 10.14492/hokmj/2019-202
![]() |
[3] |
Á. Antón-Sancho, $F_4$ and $\text{PSp}(8, \mathbb{C})$-Higgs pairs understood as fixed points of the moduli space of $E_6$-Higgs bundles over a compact Riemann surface, Open Math., 20 (2022), 1723–1733. https://doi.org/10.1515/math-2022-0543 doi: 10.1515/math-2022-0543
![]() |
[4] |
Á. Antón-Sancho, Fixed points of automorphisms of the vector bundle moduli space over a compact Riemann surface, Mediterr. J. Math., 21 (2024), 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00009-023-02559-z doi: 10.1007/s00009-023-02559-z
![]() |
[5] |
Á. Antón-Sancho, Fixed points of involutions of $G$-Higgs bundle moduli spaces over a compact Riemann surface with classical complex structure group, Front. Math., 19 (2024), 1025–1039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11464-023-0014-0 doi: 10.1007/s11464-023-0014-0
![]() |
[6] |
Á. Antón-Sancho, A construction of Shatz strata in the polystable $G_2$-bundles moduli space using Hecke curves, Electron. Res. Arch., 32 (2024), 6109–6119. https://doi.org/10.3934/era.2024283 doi: 10.3934/era.2024283
![]() |
[7] |
D. Baraglia, Classification of the automorphism and isometry groups of Higgs bundle moduli spaces, Proc. London Math. Soc., 112 (2016), 827–854. https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/pdw014 doi: 10.1112/plms/pdw014
![]() |
[8] |
A. Białynicki-Birula, Some theorems on actions of algebraic groups, Ann. Math., 98 (1973), 480–497. https://doi.org/10.2307/1970915 doi: 10.2307/1970915
![]() |
[9] |
S. B. Bradlow, O. García-Prada, I. Mundet-Riera, Relative Hitchin-Kobayashi correspondences for principal pairs, Quart. J. Math., 54 (2003), 171–208. https://doi.org/10.1093/qmath/hag013 doi: 10.1093/qmath/hag013
![]() |
[10] |
O. Dumitrescu, L. Fredrickson, G. Kydonakis, R. Mazzeo, M. Mulase, A. Neitzke, From the Hitchin section to opers through nonabelian Hodge, J. Differential Geom., 117 (2021), 223–253. https://doi.org/10.4310/jdg/1612975016 doi: 10.4310/jdg/1612975016
![]() |
[11] |
B. Collier, R. Wentworth, Conformal limits and the Białynicki-Birula stratification of the space of $\lambda$-connections, Adv. Math., 350 (2019), 1193–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2019.04.034 doi: 10.1016/j.aim.2019.04.034
![]() |
[12] |
R. Fedorov, A. Soibelman, Y. Soibelman, Motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants of parabolic Higgs bundles and parabolic connections on a curve, SIGMA, 16 (2020), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2020.070 doi: 10.3842/SIGMA.2020.070
![]() |
[13] |
O. García-Prada, J. Heinloth, A. H. W. Schmitt, On the motives of moduli of chains and Higgs bundles, J. Eur. Math. Soc., 16 (2014), 2617–2668. https://doi.org/10.4171/JEMS/494 doi: 10.4171/JEMS/494
![]() |
[14] |
O. García-Prada, S. Ramanan, Involutions and higher order automorphisms of Higgs bundle moduli spaces, Proc. London Math. Soc., 119 (2019), 681–732. https://doi.org/10.1112/plms.12242 doi: 10.1112/plms.12242
![]() |
[15] |
P. Gothen, R. A. Zúñiga-Rojas, Stratifications on the moduli space of Higgs bundles, Portugal. Math., 74 (2017), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.4171/PM/1996 doi: 10.4171/PM/1996
![]() |
[16] |
G. Harder, M. S. Narasimhan, On the cohomology groups of moduli spaces of vector bundles on curves, Math. Ann., 212 (1975), 215–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01357141 doi: 10.1007/BF01357141
![]() |
[17] | T. Hausel, Geometry of Higgs bundles, PhD thesis, Cambridge University, United Kingdom, 1998. |
[18] |
T. Hausel, M. Thaddeus, Mirror symmetry, Langlands duality, and the Hitchin system, Invent. Math., 153 (2003), 197–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-003-0286-7 doi: 10.1007/s00222-003-0286-7
![]() |
[19] | T. Hausel, M. Thaddeus, Relations in the cohomology ring of the moduli space of rank $2$ Higgs bundles, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 16 (2003), 303–327. |
[20] |
T. Hausel, M. Thaddeus, Generators for the cohomology ring of the moduli space of rank $2$ Higgs bundles, Proc. London Math. Soc., 88 (2004), 632–658. https://doi.org/10.1112/S0024611503014618 doi: 10.1112/S0024611503014618
![]() |
[21] |
N. J. Hitchin, The self-duality equations on a Riemann surface, Proc. London Math. Soc., 55 (1987), 59–126. https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s3-55.1.59 doi: 10.1112/plms/s3-55.1.59
![]() |
[22] |
T. Kinjo, N. Koseki, Cohomological $\chi$-independence for Higgs bundles and Gopakumar–Vafa invariants, J. Eur. Math. Soc., 2024. https://doi.org/10.4171/JEMS/1487 doi: 10.4171/JEMS/1487
![]() |
[23] | T. Mochizuki, Donaldson type invariants for algebraic surfaces, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1972, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-93913-9 |
[24] | N. Nitsure, Moduli space of semistable pairs on a curve, Proc. London Math. Soc., 62 (1991), 275–300. |
[25] | S. S. Shatz, The decomposition and specialization of algebraic families of vector bundles, Compos. Math., 35 (1977), 163–187. |
[26] | C. T. Simpson, Higgs bundles and local systems, Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math., 75 (1992), 5–95. |
[27] | C. T. Simpson, Moduli of representations of the fundamental group of a smooth projective variety Ⅰ, Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math., 79 (1994), 47–129. |
[28] | C. T. Simpson, Moduli of representations of the fundamental group of a smooth projective variety Ⅱ, Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math., 80 (1994), 5–79. |
[29] |
A. Thomas, A gentle introduction to the non-abelian Hodge correspondence, Enseign. Math., 2024. https://doi.org/10.4171/LEM/1072 doi: 10.4171/LEM/1072
![]() |