As a knowledge-intensive financial enterprise, intellectual capital can play a significant driving role in enhancing the value of financial enterprises. Especially in the current unstable and complex international financial market, it is necessary for financial enterprises to actively consider the advantages of intellectual capital to shape their competitive edge and maximize profit value. However, it is also important to consider the issue of asymmetric information within the financial system, particularly the attitudes and behaviors in the strategic interactions between governments and financial enterprises. Therefore, this paper took the strict logical structure and analytical method of game theory as an effective analytical tool to solve the problem of asymmetric information in the economy and to use the asymmetric information game method to construct a mathematical model of intellectual capital in order to cope with the mistrust in the game process. Based on game theory, this paper systematically analyzed the factors influencing intellectual capital and constructed mathematical models of game theory for adverse selection ex-ante and moral hazard ex-post, analyzing strategic behavior. The research results indicated that, from the perspectives of market reactions and financing constraints, there is an issue of information asymmetry between the government and financial enterprises. The paper also presents viable strategic recommendations for alleviating information asymmetry and achieving coordinated allocation of information resources between government and enterprises.
Citation: Bei Yuan. Mathematical modeling of intellectual capital asymmetric information game in financial enterprises[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 5708-5721. doi: 10.3934/math.2024277
As a knowledge-intensive financial enterprise, intellectual capital can play a significant driving role in enhancing the value of financial enterprises. Especially in the current unstable and complex international financial market, it is necessary for financial enterprises to actively consider the advantages of intellectual capital to shape their competitive edge and maximize profit value. However, it is also important to consider the issue of asymmetric information within the financial system, particularly the attitudes and behaviors in the strategic interactions between governments and financial enterprises. Therefore, this paper took the strict logical structure and analytical method of game theory as an effective analytical tool to solve the problem of asymmetric information in the economy and to use the asymmetric information game method to construct a mathematical model of intellectual capital in order to cope with the mistrust in the game process. Based on game theory, this paper systematically analyzed the factors influencing intellectual capital and constructed mathematical models of game theory for adverse selection ex-ante and moral hazard ex-post, analyzing strategic behavior. The research results indicated that, from the perspectives of market reactions and financing constraints, there is an issue of information asymmetry between the government and financial enterprises. The paper also presents viable strategic recommendations for alleviating information asymmetry and achieving coordinated allocation of information resources between government and enterprises.
| [1] | P. Nesegil, The effect of intellectual capital efficiency on financial performance: a research on participation banks, J. Life Econ., 8 (2021), 281-287. |
| [2] |
D. T. Nguyen, T. D. Q. Le, S. H. Tran, The moderating role of income diversification on the relationship between intellectual capital and bank performance evidence from Viet Nam, Cogent Bus. Manag., 10 (2023), 2182621. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2182621 doi: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2182621
|
| [3] | J. Bananuka, Intellectual capital, isomorphic forces and internet financial reporting: evidence from Uganda's financial services firms, J. Econ. Adm. Sci., 36 (2019), 110-133. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-03-2018-0042 |
| [4] | K. C. T. Duho, Intangibles, intellectual capital, and the performance of listed non-financial services firms in West Africa: a cross-country analysis, Merits, 2 (2022), 101-125. https://doi.org/10.3390/merits2030009 |
| [5] |
P. N. Tran, D. H. Vo, Do banks accumulate a higher level of intellectual capital? Evidence from an emerging market, J. Intellec. Cap., 23 (2020), 439-457. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-03-2020-0097 doi: 10.1108/JIC-03-2020-0097
|
| [6] |
M. T. H. Majumder, I. J. Ruma, A. Akter, Does intellectual capital affect bank performance? Evidence from Bangladesh, LBS J. Manag. Res., 21 (2023), 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1108/LBSJMR-05-2022-0016 doi: 10.1108/LBSJMR-05-2022-0016
|
| [7] |
P. Prasojo, W. Yadiati, T. Fitrijanti, M. Sueb, Exploring the relationship between intellectual capital and maqasid sharia-based performance: the moderating role of sharia governance, J. Islamic Mark., 14 (2023), 2130-2146. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-07-2021-0226 doi: 10.1108/JIMA-07-2021-0226
|
| [8] |
P. N. Githaiga, Income diversification and bank risk-taking: the moderating role of intellectual capital, Cogent Bus. Manag., 9 (2022), 2149142. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2149142 doi: 10.1080/23311975.2022.2149142
|
| [9] |
M. A. S. Mollah, M. A. Rouf, The impact of intellectual capital on commercial banks' performance: evidence from Bangladesh, J. Money Bus., 2 (2022), 82-93. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMB-07-2021-0024 doi: 10.1108/JMB-07-2021-0024
|
| [10] | N. Niccolò, Intellectual capital: the missing link in the corporate social responsibility-financial performance relationship, J. Intellect. Cap., 23 (2022), 420-438. https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-02-2020-0038 |
| [11] |
L. A. M. Chowdhury, T. Rana, M. Akter, H. Mahfuzul, Impact of intellectual capital on financial performance: evidence from the Bangladeshi textile sector, J. Account. Organ. Chan., 14 (2018), 429-454. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-11-2017-0109 doi: 10.1108/JAOC-11-2017-0109
|
| [12] |
D. B. Tran, D. H. Vo, Should bankers be concerned with Intellectual capital? A study of the Thai banking sector, J. Intellect. Cap., 19 (2018), 897-914. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-12-2017-0185 doi: 10.1108/JIC-12-2017-0185
|
| [13] |
H. S. Mohammad, I. Bujang, Performance of Malaysian financial firms: an intellectual capital perspective using MVAIC model, Asian Econ. Financ. Rev., 9 (2019), 752-765. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr.2019.97.752.765 doi: 10.18488/journal.aefr.2019.97.752.765
|
| [14] |
Y. Yang, Do aggressive pro forma earnings-reporting firms have difficulty disclosing intellectual capital? Australian evidence, J. Intellect. Cap., 19 (2018), 875-896. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-03-2017-0051 doi: 10.1108/JIC-03-2017-0051
|
| [15] |
G. Ginesti, A. Caldarelli, A. Zampella, Exploring the impact of intellectual capital on company reputation and performance, J. Intellect. Cap., 19 (2018), 915-934. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-01-2018-0012 doi: 10.1108/JIC-01-2018-0012
|
| [16] | M. A. Ibarra Cisneros, F. Hernandez-Perlines, Intellectual capital and Organization performance in the manufacturing sector of Mexico, Manag. Decis., 56 (2018), 1818-1834. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2017-0946 |
| [17] | F. Bertani, L. Ponta, M. Raberto, A. Teglio, Silvano Cincotti, The complexity of the intangible digital economy: an agent-based model, J. Bus. Res., 129 (2021), 527-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.041 |
| [18] |
S. U. Rehman, H. Elrehail, A. Alsaad, A. Bhatti, Intellectual capital and innovative performance: a mediation-moderation perspective, J. Intellect. Cap., 23 (2021), 998-1024. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-04-2020-0109 doi: 10.1108/JIC-04-2020-0109
|
| [19] | H. Hong, J. D. Kubik, J. A. Scheinkman, Financial constraints on corporate goodness, NBER Working Paper, 2012. |
| [20] |
T. Garanina, J. Dumay, Forward-looking intellectual capital disclosure in IPOs: implications for intellectual capital and integrated reporting, J. Intellect. Cap., 18 (2017), 128-148. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-05-2016-0054 doi: 10.1108/JIC-05-2016-0054
|
| [21] |
F. Caputo, M. D. Giudice, F. Evangelista, G. Russo, Corporate disclosure and intellectual capital: the light side of information asymmetry, Int. J. Manag. Financ. Account., 8 (2016), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMFA.2016.076668 doi: 10.1504/IJMFA.2016.076668
|
| [22] | W. Widarjo, R. Rahmawati, B. Bandi, A. K. Widagd, Underwriter reputation, intellectual capital disclosure, and underpricing, Int. J. Biol. Sci., 18 (2017), 227-244. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.480.2017 |
| [23] |
F. Caputo, M. D. Giudice, F. Evangelista, G. Russo, Corporate disclosure and intellectual capital: the light side of information asymmetry, Int. J. Manag. Financ. Account., 8 (2016), 75-97. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMFA.2016.076668 doi: 10.1504/IJMFA.2016.076668
|
| [24] |
J. Chouaibi, A. Kouaib, Impact of shareholder' identity on intellectual capital performance: evidence from Tunisian manufacturing companies, Int. J. Manag. Financ. Account., 7 (2016), 246-267. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMFA.2015.074903 doi: 10.1504/IJMFA.2015.074903
|
| [25] |
A. Limijaya, Y. Hutagaol-Martowidjojo, E. Hartanto, Intellectual capital and firm performance in Indonesia: the moderating role of corporate governance, Int. J. Manag. Financ. Account., 13 (2021), 159-182. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMFA.2021.117772 doi: 10.1504/IJMFA.2021.117772
|
Bei Yuan. Mathematical modeling of intellectual capital asymmetric information game in financial enterprises[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 5708-5721. doi: 10.3934/math.2024277
DownLoad: