Research article Special Issues

Measurement and spatiotemporal patterns of China's digital economy efficiency

  • Received: 11 September 2023 Revised: 13 October 2023 Accepted: 22 October 2023 Published: 30 October 2023
  • MSC : 62P20

  • The digital economy has deeply integrated into various sectors, becoming a significant driving force for economic transformation and development, as new generation information technology continues to advance and mature. This paper builds upon theoretical analysis and employs the global Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method, along with relevant data from China's information transmission, software and information services industry spanning the years 2003 to 2020, to dynamically measure the output efficiency of China's digital economy. Based on this, the paper examines the overall characteristics of efficiency changes in the digital economy using distribution dynamics. Additionally, common descriptive statistics and data mapping techniques are utilized to reveal the spatiotemporal patterns of efficiency changes. The findings of the study are as follows: (1) The efficiency of the digital economy in the 31 provincial regions of China remains stable, but the factors influencing this efficiency vary both over time and among specific provinces. (2) From a temporal perspective, the digital economy in China demonstrates an overall positive increase in efficiency, with its volatility and differentiation largely shaped by the shifting factors of technological advancements and technological efficiency. (3) From a spatial perspective, there exists a distinct pattern of spatial disparities in China's digital economy efficiency, with higher efficiency observed in the eastern regions and lower efficiency in the western regions.

    Citation: Yanting Xu, Tinghui Li. Measurement and spatiotemporal patterns of China's digital economy efficiency[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 29307-29331. doi: 10.3934/math.20231500

    Related Papers:

  • The digital economy has deeply integrated into various sectors, becoming a significant driving force for economic transformation and development, as new generation information technology continues to advance and mature. This paper builds upon theoretical analysis and employs the global Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method, along with relevant data from China's information transmission, software and information services industry spanning the years 2003 to 2020, to dynamically measure the output efficiency of China's digital economy. Based on this, the paper examines the overall characteristics of efficiency changes in the digital economy using distribution dynamics. Additionally, common descriptive statistics and data mapping techniques are utilized to reveal the spatiotemporal patterns of efficiency changes. The findings of the study are as follows: (1) The efficiency of the digital economy in the 31 provincial regions of China remains stable, but the factors influencing this efficiency vary both over time and among specific provinces. (2) From a temporal perspective, the digital economy in China demonstrates an overall positive increase in efficiency, with its volatility and differentiation largely shaped by the shifting factors of technological advancements and technological efficiency. (3) From a spatial perspective, there exists a distinct pattern of spatial disparities in China's digital economy efficiency, with higher efficiency observed in the eastern regions and lower efficiency in the western regions.



    加载中


    [1] CAICT, Digital economy development in China, China Academy of Information and Communications Technology, 2020. Available from: http://www.caict.ac.cn/english/research/whitepapers/202007/t20200706_285683.html.
    [2] CAICT, White paper on China's digital economy development, China Academy of Information and Communications Technology, 2021. Available from: http://www.caict.ac.cn/english/research/whitepapers/202104/t20210429_375940.html.
    [3] A. García-Herrero, J. Xu, How big is China's digital economy, Bruegel, 2018. Available from: https://www.bruegel.org/working-paper/how-big-chinas-digital-economy.
    [4] OECD, Measuring the digital economy: a new perspective, Paris: OECD Publishing, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264221796-en
    [5] K. Barefoot, D. Curtis, W. Jolliff, J. Nicholson, R. Omohundro, Defining and measuring the digital economy, BEA, 2018. Available from: https://www.bea.gov/research/papers/2018/defining-and-measuring-digital-economy.
    [6] K. Barefoot, D. Curtis, W. Jolliff, J. Nicholson, R. Omohundro, Measuring the digital economy, BEA, 2019. Available from: https://apps.bea.gov/scb/issues/2019/05-may/0519-digital-economy.htm.
    [7] J. Nicholson, New digital economy estimates, BEA, 2020. Available from: https://www.bea.gov/system/files/2020-08/New-Digital-Economy-Estimates-August-2020.pdf.
    [8] BEA, Updated digital economy estimates: June 2021, BEA, 2021. Available from: https://vdocuments.net/updated-digital-economy-estimates-june-2021.html?page = 1.
    [9] T. Highfill, C. Surfield, New and revised statistics of the U.S. digital economy, 2005–2020, BEA, 2023. Available from: https://www.bea.gov/system/files/2022-11/new-and-revised-statistics-of-the-us-digital-economy-2005-2021.pdf.
    [10] Y. Xu, T. Li, Measuring digital economy in China, Nal. Account. Rev., 4 (2022), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.3934/NAR.2022015 doi: 10.3934/NAR.2022015
    [11] World Bank Group, World development report 2016: digital dividends, World Bank Group, 2016. Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2016.
    [12] R. Katz, F. Callorda, Accelerating the development of Latin American digital ecosystem and implications for broadband policy, Telecommun. Policy, 42 (2018), 661–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.11.002 doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2017.11.002
    [13] UNCTAD, Digital economy report 2021: value creation and capture: implications for developing countries, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2021. Available from: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/der2021_en.pdf.
    [14] N. Cámara, D. Tuesta, DiGiX: the digitization index, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, 2021. Available from: https://www.bbvaresearch.com/en/publicaciones/digix-the-digitization-index/.
    [15] S. Dutta, B. Lanvin, The network readiness index 2021, Portulans Institute, 2021. Available from: https://networkreadinessindex.org/introducing-the-network-readiness-index-2021/.
    [16] Strategy &, Energizing the digital economy in the Gulf countries, Strategy &, 2021. Available from: https://prod-dei-fe.azurewebsites.net/.
    [17] The European Commission, Digital economy and society index 2022, The European Commission, 2022. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_4560.
    [18] A. Sanchez-Riofrio, N. Lupton, J. Rodriguez-Vasquez, Does market digitalization always benefit firms? The Latin American case, Manage. Decis., 60 (2022), 1905–1921. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2021-0117 doi: 10.1108/MD-01-2021-0117
    [19] J. Li, L. Chen, Y. Chen, J. He, Digital economy, technological innovation, and green economic efficiency—Empirical evidence from 277 cities in China, Manage. Decis. Econ., 43 (2021), 616–629. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3406 doi: 10.1002/mde.3406
    [20] J. Ma, Z. Li, Measuring China's urban digital economy, Natl. Account. Rew., 4 (2022), 329–361. https://doi.org/10.3934/NAR.2022019 doi: 10.3934/NAR.2022019
    [21] J. Zhang, Y. Lyu, Y. Li, Y. Geng, Digital economy: an innovation driving factor for low-carbon development, Environ. Impact Asses. Rev., 96 (2022), 106821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106821 doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106821
    [22] S. Xu, C. Yang, Z. Huang, P. Failler, Interaction between digital economy and environmental pollution: new evidence from a spatial perspective, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19 (2022), 5074. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095074 doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095074
    [23] X. Wang, X. Sun, H. Zhang, C. Xue, Digital economy development and urban green innovation capability: based on panel data of 274 prefecture-level cities in China, Sustainability, 14 (2022), 2921. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052921 doi: 10.3390/su14052921
    [24] F. He, Q. Zhang, J. Lei, W. Fu, X. Xu, Energy efficiency and productivity change of China's iron and steel industry: accounting for undesirable outputs, Energy Policy, 54 (2013), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.020 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.020
    [25] M. Song, J. Peng, J. Wang, J. Zhao, Environmental efficiency and economic growth of China: a ray slack-based model analysis, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 269 (2018), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.03.073 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.03.073
    [26] Y. Jin, X. Gao, M. Wang, The financing efficiency of listed energy conservation and environmental protection firms: evidence and implications for green finance in China, Energy Policy, 153 (2021), 112254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112254 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112254
    [27] X. Cai, W. Wang, A. Rao, S. Rahim, X. Zhao, Regional sustainable development and spatial effects from the perspective of renewable energy, Front. Environ. Sci., 10 (2022), 859523. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.859523 doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.859523
    [28] T. Zhao, H. Zhou, J. Jiang, W. Yan, Impact of green finance and environmental regulations on the green innovation efficiency in China, Sustainability, 14 (2022), 3206. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063206 doi: 10.3390/su14063206
    [29] T. Li, J. Ma, Does digital finance benefit the income of rural residents? A case study on China, Quant. Financ. Econ., 5 (2021), 664–688. https://doi.org/10.3934/QFE.2021030 doi: 10.3934/QFE.2021030
    [30] G. Liao, Z. Li, M. Wang, K. Albitar, Measuring China's urban digital finance, Quant. Financ. Econ., 6 (2022), 385–404. https://doi.org/10.3934/QFE.2022017 doi: 10.3934/QFE.2022017
    [31] H. Jiang, J. Murmann, The rise of China's digital economy: an overview, Manage. Organ. Rev., 18 (2022), 790–802. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2022.32 doi: 10.1017/mor.2022.32
    [32] Z. Li, Z. Huang, Y. Su, New media environment, environmental regulation and corporate green technology innovation: evidence from China, Energy Econ., 119 (2023), 106545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106545 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106545
    [33] Y. Zheng, S. Chen, N. Wang, Does financial agglomeration enhance regional green economy development? Evidence from China, Green Financ., 2 (2020), 173–196. https://doi.org/10.3934/GF.2020010 doi: 10.3934/GF.2020010
    [34] T. Li, X. Li, G. Liao, Business cycles and energy intensity: evidence from emerging economies, Borsa Istanbul Rev., 22 (2022), 560–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.07.005 doi: 10.1016/j.bir.2021.07.005
    [35] P. Liu, Y. Zhao, J. Zhu, C. Yang, Technological industry agglomeration, green innovation efficiency, and development quality of city cluster, Green Financ., 4 (2022), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.3934/GF.2022020 doi: 10.3934/GF.2022020
    [36] D. Kolia, S. Papadopoulos, The levels of bank capital, risk and efficiency in the Eurozone and the U.S. in the aftermath of the financial crisis, Quant. Financ. Econ., 4 (2020), 66–90. https://doi.org/10.3934/QFE.2020004 doi: 10.3934/QFE.2020004
    [37] A. Bilal, P. Wongthongtham, D. Zhu, K. Chan, A. Rudra, Introduction to big data technology, In: Social big data analytics, Singapore: Springer, 2021, 15–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6652-7_2
    [38] J. Lin, Z. Yu, Y. Wei, M. Wang, Internet access, spillover and regional development in China, Sustainability, 9 (2017), 946. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060946 doi: 10.3390/su9060946
    [39] H. Liu, C. Fang, S. Sun, Digital inequality in provincial China, Environ. Plann. A, 49 (2017), 2179–2182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17711946 doi: 10.1177/0308518X17711946
    [40] H. Wang, X. Hu, N. Ali, Spatial characteristics and driving factors toward the digital economy: evidence from prefecture-level cities in China, J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus., 9 (2022), 419–426. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2022.vol9.no2.0419 doi: 10.13106/jafeb.2022.vol9.no2.0419
    [41] R. Luo, N. Zhou, Dynamic evolution, spatial differences, and driving factors of China's provincial digital economy, Sustainability, 14 (2022), 9376. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159376 doi: 10.3390/su14159376
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1061) PDF downloads(66) Cited by(5)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(12)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog