Fused deposition modeling (FDM) fabricated components have gained significant attention and widespread adoption across modern industries due to their versatility, serving as both prototypes and final products. FDM offers rapid and cost-effective prototyping and production capabilities; however, utilizing directly manufactured FDM parts is not practical. Secondary operations like post-processing, testing, and validation are typically required to ensure that the fabricated parts meet the necessary standards for their intended applications. Desired repeatability, reproducibility, reliability, and preciseness should be the main prerequisites of the part fabricated. It is desirable that additive manufacturing (AM) products should be produced with advanced control processes which should possess acceptable quality characteristics. Ensuring the dimensional accuracy of FDM parts is very crucial, and hence it is important to emphasize the key factors that influence the dimensional precision during their fabrication. Sharing insights into these critical factors is essential to steer scholars, researchers, and the AM industry towards informed decisions and future advancements in AM. We aimed to outline the significant factors influencing the dimensional accuracy of the FDM part. These research papers are collected from Scopus and web of science data using "FDM" and "dimensional accuracy" as the keywords. We include the latest papers published especially during 2020 to 2024, which were lacking in earlier research.
Citation: Azhar Equbal, Ramesh Murmu, Veenit Kumar, Md. Asif Equbal. A recent review on advancements in dimensional accuracy in fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2024, 11(5): 950-990. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024046
Fused deposition modeling (FDM) fabricated components have gained significant attention and widespread adoption across modern industries due to their versatility, serving as both prototypes and final products. FDM offers rapid and cost-effective prototyping and production capabilities; however, utilizing directly manufactured FDM parts is not practical. Secondary operations like post-processing, testing, and validation are typically required to ensure that the fabricated parts meet the necessary standards for their intended applications. Desired repeatability, reproducibility, reliability, and preciseness should be the main prerequisites of the part fabricated. It is desirable that additive manufacturing (AM) products should be produced with advanced control processes which should possess acceptable quality characteristics. Ensuring the dimensional accuracy of FDM parts is very crucial, and hence it is important to emphasize the key factors that influence the dimensional precision during their fabrication. Sharing insights into these critical factors is essential to steer scholars, researchers, and the AM industry towards informed decisions and future advancements in AM. We aimed to outline the significant factors influencing the dimensional accuracy of the FDM part. These research papers are collected from Scopus and web of science data using "FDM" and "dimensional accuracy" as the keywords. We include the latest papers published especially during 2020 to 2024, which were lacking in earlier research.
| [1] |
Mangla SK, Kazancoglu Y, Sezer MD, et al. (2023) Optimizing fused deposition modelling parameters based on the design for additive manufacturing to enhance product sustainability. Comput Ind 145: 103833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103833 doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2022.103833
|
| [2] |
Kim H, Lin Y, Tseng TB (2018) A review on quality control in additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyping J 24: 645–669. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-03-2017-0048 doi: 10.1108/RPJ-03-2017-0048
|
| [3] |
Wong KV, Hernandez A (2012) A review of additive manufacturing. Int Scholarly Res Notices 1: 208760. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/208760 doi: 10.5402/2012/208760
|
| [4] | Sky Quest Technology (2018) From additive manufacturing market. Available from: https://www.skyquestt.com/report/additive-manufacturing-market. |
| [5] |
Eren O, Sezer HK, Yalç ın N (2022) Effect of lattice design on mechanical response of PolyJet additively manufactured cellular structures. J Manuf Process 75: 111175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.01.063 doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.01.063
|
| [6] |
Gunasekaran K, Aravinth V, Kumaran CBM, et al. (2021) Investigation of mechanical properties of PLA printed materials under varying infill density. Mater Today Proc 45: 1849–1856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.041 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.041
|
| [7] |
Dave HK, Patadiya NH, Prajapati AR, et al. (2019) Effect of infill pattern and infill density at varying part orientation on tensile properties of fused deposition modelling-printed poly-lactic acid part. Proc Inst Mech Eng C 235: 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406219856383 doi: 10.1177/0954406219856383
|
| [8] |
Equbal A, Akhter S, Sood AK, et al. (2021) The usefulness of additive manufacturing (AM) in COVID-19. Ann 3D Print 2: 100013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stlm.2021.100013 doi: 10.1016/j.stlm.2021.100013
|
| [9] | ASTM International (2012) From standard terminology for additive manufacturing technologies (Designation: F2792-12a). Available from: https://www.astm.org. |
| [10] | Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B, et al. (2021) Additive Manufacturing Technologies, Switzerland: Springer Nature. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56127-7 |
| [11] |
Maguluri N, Suresh G, VenkataRao K (2023) Assessing the effect of FDM processing parameters on mechanical properties of PLA parts using Taguchi method. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 36: 1472–1488. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057211053036 doi: 10.1177/08927057211053036
|
| [12] |
Equbal A, Equbal MI, Sood AK (2019) PCA-based desirability method for dimensional improvement of part extruded by fused deposition modelling technology. Prog Addit Manuf 4: 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-018-00072-4 doi: 10.1007/s40964-018-00072-4
|
| [13] | Nancharaiah T, Raju DR, Raju VR (2010) An experimental investigation on surface quality and dimensional accuracy of FDM components. Int J Emerg Technol 1: 106–111. |
| [14] | Stratasys (2004) From FDM Vantage User Guide Version 1.1. Available from: https://www.stratasys.com. |
| [15] |
Equbal A, Equbal MI, Sood AK (2019) An investigation on the feasibility of fused deposition modelling process in EDM electrode manufacturing. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 26: 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2019.07.001 doi: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2019.07.001
|
| [16] |
Equbal A, Sood AK, Equbal MI, et al. (2022) RSM based investigation of compressive properties of FDM fabricated part. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 35: 701–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.08.004 doi: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.08.004
|
| [17] |
Ali MH, Kurokawa S, Shehab E, et al. (2023) Development of a large-scale multi-extrusion FDM printer, and its challenges. Int J Lightweight Mater Manuf 6: 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2022.10.001 doi: 10.1016/j.ijlmm.2022.10.001
|
| [18] | Gorana F, Modi YK (2023) Process parameter optimization for fabrication of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene parts. Mater Today Proc (In press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.08.204 |
| [19] |
Tientcheu SWT, Djouda JM, Bouaziz MA, et al. (2024) A review on fused deposition modeling materials with analysis of key process parameters influence on mechanical properties. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 130: 2119–2158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12823-x doi: 10.1007/s00170-023-12823-x
|
| [20] |
Peng A, Xiao X, Yue R (2014) Process parameter optimization for fused deposition modelling using response surface methodology combined with fuzzy inference system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73: 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5796-5 doi: 10.1007/s00170-014-5796-5
|
| [21] |
Mohamed O, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL (2015) Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: A review of current research and future prospects. Adv Manuf 3: 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7 doi: 10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7
|
| [22] |
Pennington RC, Hoekstra NL, Newcomer JL (2005) Significant factors in the dimensional accuracy of fused deposition modelling. Proc Inst Mech Eng E 219: 89–92. https://doi.org/10.1243/095440805X6964 doi: 10.1243/095440805X6964
|
| [23] |
Nakamura N, Mori K, Abe Y (2020) Applicability of plastic tools additively manufactured by fused deposition modelling for sheet metal forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108: 975–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04590-5 doi: 10.1007/s00170-019-04590-5
|
| [24] |
Sandanamsamy L, Harun WSW, Ishak I, et al. (2023) A comprehensive review on fused deposition modelling of polylactic acid. Prog Addit Manuf 8: 775–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-022-00356-w doi: 10.1007/s40964-022-00356-w
|
| [25] |
Wang CC, Lin TW, Hu SS (2007) Optimizing the rapid prototyping process by integrating the Taguchi method with the gray relational analysis. Rapid Prototyping J 13: 304–315. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540710824814 doi: 10.1108/13552540710824814
|
| [26] |
Bakar NA, Alkahari MR, Boejang H (2010) Analysis on fused deposition modelling performance. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci A 11: 972–977. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1001365 doi: 10.1631/jzus.A1001365
|
| [27] |
Kumar VV, Tagore GRN, Venugopal A (2011) Some investigations on geometric conformity analysis of a 3-D freeform objects produced by rapid prototyping (FDM) process. Int J Appl Res Mech Eng 1: 82–86. https://doi.org/10.47893/IJARME.2012.1036 doi: 10.47893/IJARME.2012.1036
|
| [28] |
Zhang JW, Peng AH (2012) Process-parameter optimization for fused deposition modelling based on Taguchi method. Adv Mater Res 538: 444–447. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.538-541.444 doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.538-541.444
|
| [29] |
Noriega A, Blanco D, Alvarez BJ, et al. (2013) Dimensional accuracy improvement of FDM square cross-section parts using artificial neural networks and an optimization algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69: 2301–2313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5196-2 doi: 10.1007/s00170-013-5196-2
|
| [30] |
Sahu RK, Mahapatra SS, Sood AK (2013) A study on dimensional accuracy of fused deposition modeling (FDM) processed parts using fuzzy logic. J Manuf Sci Prod 13: 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1515/jmsp-2013-0010 doi: 10.1515/jmsp-2013-0010
|
| [31] |
Zhang X, Fan W, Liu T (2020) Fused deposition modeling 3D printing of polyamide-based composites and its applications. Compos Commun 21: 100413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2020.100413 doi: 10.1016/j.coco.2020.100413
|
| [32] |
Lunetto V, Priarone PC, Galati M, et al. (2020) On the correlation between process parameters and specific energy consumption in fused deposition modelling. J Manuf Process 56: 1039–1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.06.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.06.002
|
| [33] |
Brahmbhatt NP, Patel VV, Brahmbhatt MP (2015) Optimization of process parameters of ABS material made by fused deposition modeling—A review. Int J Sci Res Dev 3: 230–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7 doi: 10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7
|
| [34] | Nazafloo B, Nouri MR, Rezadoust AM (2016) A review on fused deposition modeling method. Polymerization 6: 74–85. |
| [35] |
Baran EH, Erbil HY (2019) Surface modification of 3D printed PLA objects by fused deposition modeling: A review. Colloids Interfaces 3: 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids3020043 doi: 10.3390/colloids3020043
|
| [36] |
Sheoran AJ, Kumar H (2020) Fused deposition modeling process parameters optimization and effect on mechanical properties and part quality: Review and reflection on present research. Mater Today Proc 21: 1659–1672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.296 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.296
|
| [37] |
Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL (2016) Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters for dimensional accuracy using I-optimality criterion. Measurement 81: 174–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.12.011 doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.12.011
|
| [38] |
Chohan JS, Singh R, Boparai KS, et al. (2017) Dimensional accuracy analysis of coupled fused deposition modeling and vapor smoothing operations for biomedical applications. Compos Part B Eng 117: 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.033 doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.033
|
| [39] |
Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2010) Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modeling processed parts. Mater Des 31: 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016 doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016
|
| [40] |
Monzón MD, Gibson I, Benítez AN, et al. (2013) Process and material behavior modeling for a new design of micro-additive fused deposition. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67: 2717–2726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4686-y doi: 10.1007/s00170-012-4686-y
|
| [41] |
Wild A (2014) Integration of functional circuits into FDM parts. Adv Mater Res 1038: 29–33. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1038.29 doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1038.29
|
| [42] |
Mohan N, Senthil P, Vinodh S, et al. (2017) A review on composite materials and process parameters optimization for the fused deposition modelling process. Virtual Phys Prototy 12: 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1274490 doi: 10.1080/17452759.2016.1274490
|
| [43] |
Boschetto A, Giordano V, Veniali F (2013) 3D roughness profile model in fused deposition modelling. Rapid Prototyping J 19: 240–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13552541311323254 doi: 10.1108/13552541311323254
|
| [44] |
Li H, Wang T, Sun J, et al. (2018) The effect of process parameters in fused deposition modelling on bonding degree and mechanical properties. Rapid Prototyping J 24: 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-06-2016-0090 doi: 10.1108/RPJ-06-2016-0090
|
| [45] |
Gul R (2014) The relationship between reputation, customer satisfaction, trust, and loyalty. J Public Admin Gov 4: 368–378. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v4i3.6678 doi: 10.5296/jpag.v4i3.6678
|
| [46] |
Boschetto A, Bottini L (2016) Design for manufacturing of surfaces to improve accuracy in fused deposition modeling. Robotics Comput-Integrated Manuf 37: 103–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2015.07.005 doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2015.07.005
|
| [47] |
Kim GD, Oh YT (2008) A benchmark study on rapid prototyping processes and machines: Quantitative comparisons of mechanical properties, accuracy, roughness, speed, and material cost. Proc Inst Mech Eng B 222: 201–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM724 doi: 10.1243/09544054JEM724
|
| [48] |
Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2009) Improving dimensional accuracy of fused deposition modelling processed parts using grey Taguchi method. Mater Design 30: 4243–4252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.04.030 doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.04.030
|
| [49] |
Turner BN, Gold SA (2015) A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: Ⅱ. Materials, dimensional accuracy, and surface roughness. Rapid Prototyping J 21: 250–261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-02-2013-0017 doi: 10.1108/RPJ-02-2013-0017
|
| [50] | Yang Y, Chen Y, Wei Y, et al. (2016) 3D printing of shape memory polymer for functional part fabrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84: 2079–2095. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00170-015-7843-2 |
| [51] |
Garg A, Bhattacharya A, Batish A (2016) On surface finish and dimensional accuracy of FDM parts after cold vapor treatment. Mater Manuf Process 31: 522–529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2015.1070425 doi: 10.1080/10426914.2015.1070425
|
| [52] |
Alafaghani A, Qattawi A (2018) Investigating the effect of fused deposition modeling processing parameters using Taguchi design of experiment method. J Manuf Process 36: 164–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.025 doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.025
|
| [53] |
Geng P, Zhao J, Wu W, et al. (2019) Effects of extrusion speed and printing speed on the 3D printing stability of extruded PEEK filament. J Manuf Process 37: 266–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.11.023 doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.11.023
|
| [54] |
Dey A, Yodo N (2019) A systematic survey of FDM process parameter optimization and their influence on part characteristics. J Manuf Mater Process 3: 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp3030064 doi: 10.3390/jmmp3030064
|
| [55] |
Dambatta YS, Sarhan AAD, Maher I, et al. (2019) Volumetric shrinkage prediction in fused deposition modelling process—ANFIS modelling approach. Int J Mater Product Technol 59: 347–365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJMPT.2019.104568 doi: 10.1504/IJMPT.2019.104568
|
| [56] |
Beniak J, Križan P, Šooš Ľ, et al. (2019) Research on shape and dimensional accuracy of FDM produced parts. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 501: 012030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/501/1/012030 doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/501/1/012030
|
| [57] |
Cattenone A, Morganti S, Alaimo G, et al. (2019) Finite element analysis of additive manufacturing based on fused deposition modeling: Distortion's prediction and comparison with experimental data. J Manuf Sci Eng 141: 011010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4041626 doi: 10.1115/1.4041626
|
| [58] |
Alhijjaj M, Nasereddin J, Belton P, et al. (2019) Impact of processing parameters on the quality of pharmaceutical solid dosage forms produced by fused deposition modeling (FDM). Pharmaceutics 11: 633. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11120633 doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11120633
|
| [59] |
Wang P, Zou B, Xiao H, et al. (2019) Effects of printing parameters of fused deposition modeling on mechanical properties, surface quality, and microstructure of PEEK. J Mater Process Technol 271: 62–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.016 doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.016
|
| [60] |
Mora SM, Gil JC, López AMC (2019) Influence of manufacturing parameters in the dimensional characteristics of ABS parts obtained by FDM using reverse engineering techniques. Procedia Manuf 41: 968–975. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.10.022 doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.10.022
|
| [61] |
Akbas OE, Hira O, Hervan SZ, et al. (2020) Dimensional accuracy of FDM-printed polymer parts. Rapid Prototyping J 26: 288–298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-04-2019-0115 doi: 10.1108/RPJ-04-2019-0115
|
| [62] |
Vyavahare S, Kumar S, Panghal D (2020) Experimental study of surface roughness, dimensional accuracy and time of fabrication of parts produced by fused deposition modelling. Rapid Prototyping J 26: 1535–1554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-12-2019-0315 doi: 10.1108/RPJ-12-2019-0315
|
| [63] |
Sandhu K, Singh G, Singh S, et al. (2020) Surface characteristics of machined polystyrene with 3D printed thermoplastic tool. Materials 13: 2729. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13122729 doi: 10.3390/ma13122729
|
| [64] |
Sheoran AJ, Kumar H (2020) Fused deposition modeling process parameters optimization and effect on mechanical properties and part quality: Review and reflection on present research. Mater Today Proc 21: 1659–1672. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.296 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.296
|
| [65] | Negrete CC (2020) Optimization of printing parameters in fused deposition modeling for improving part quality and process sustainability. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108: 2131–2147. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00170-020-05555-9 |
| [66] | Comminal R, Serdeczny MP, Pedersen DB, et al. (2018) Numerical modeling of the material deposition and contouring precision in fused deposition modeling. 2018 Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium—An Additive Manufacturing Conference, 1855–1864. http://dx.doi.org/10.26153/tsw/17188 |
| [67] | Gao X, Yu N, Li J (2020) Influence of printing parameters and filament quality on structure and properties of polymer composite components used in the fields of automotive, In: Friedrich K, Walter R, Soutis C, et al. Structure and Properties of Additive Manufactured Polymer Components, Netherlands: Woodhead Publishing, 303–330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819535-2.00010-7 |
| [68] |
Maurya NK, Rastogi V, Singh P (2020) Fabrication of prototype connecting rod of PLA plastic material using FDM prototype technology. Indian J Eng Mater Sci 27: 333–343. https://doi.org/10.56042/ijems.v27i2.45964 doi: 10.56042/ijems.v27i2.45964
|
| [69] |
Mustafa NNMM, Kadir AZAA, Ngadiman NHA, et al. (2020) Comparison of different additive manufacturing patterns on the performance of rapid vacuum casting for mating parts via the Taguchi method. J Mech Eng Sci 14: 6417–6429. http://dx.doi.org/10.15282/jmes.14.1.2020.17.0502 doi: 10.15282/jmes.14.1.2020.17.0502
|
| [70] |
Taczała J, Czepułkowska W, Konieczny B, et al. (2020) Comparison of 3D printing MJP and FDM technology in dentistry. Arch Mater Sci Eng 101: 32–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.9504 doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0013.9504
|
| [71] |
Gorgani HH, Korani H, Jahedan R, et al. (2021) A nonlinear error compensator for FDM 3D printed part dimensions using a hybrid algorithm based on GMDH neural network. J Comput Appl Mech 52: 451–477. http://dx.doi.org/10.22059/jcamech.2021.325325.628 doi: 10.22059/jcamech.2021.325325.628
|
| [72] |
Wüthrich M, Gubser M, Elspass WJ, et al. (2021) A novel slicing strategy to print overhangs without support material. Appl Sci 11: 8760. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188760 doi: 10.3390/app11188760
|
| [73] |
Chandrashekarappa MP, Chate GR, Parashivamurthy V, et al. (2021) Analysis and optimization of dimensional accuracy and porosity of high impact polystyrene material printed by FDM process: PSO, JAYA, Rao, and bald eagle search algorithms. Materials 14: 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237479 doi: 10.3390/ma14237479
|
| [74] |
Gómez-Gras G, Pérez MA, Fábregas-Moreno J, et al. (2021) Experimental study on the accuracy and surface quality of printed versus machined holes in PEI Ultem 9085 FDM specimens. Rapid Prototyping J 27: 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-12-2019-0306 doi: 10.1108/RPJ-12-2019-0306
|
| [75] | Mansaram MV, Chatterjee S, Dinbandhu AK, et al. (2021) Analysis of dimensional accuracy of ABS M30 built parts using FDM process, In: Parwani AK, Ramkumar P, Abhishek K, et al. Recent Advances in Mechanical Infrastructure. Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure, Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4176-0_14 |
| [76] |
Syrlybayev D, Perveen A, Talamona D (2021) Fused deposition modelling: Effect of extrusion temperature on the accuracy of print. Mater Today Proc 44: 832–837. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.716 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.716
|
| [77] |
Zhai W, Hu B, Li M, et al. (2021) Dimensional accuracy control and compressive property of microcellular polyetherimide honeycomb foams manufactured by an in situ foaming fused deposition modeling technology. Adv Eng Mater 23: 2001449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adem.202001449 doi: 10.1002/adem.202001449
|
| [78] |
Charalampous P, Kostavelis I, Kontodina T, et al. (2021) Learning-based error modeling in FDM 3D printing process. Rapid Prototyping J 27: 507–517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-03-2020-0046 doi: 10.1108/RPJ-03-2020-0046
|
| [79] | Charalampous P, Kostavelis I, Tzovaras D, et al. (2021) Vision-based real-time monitoring of extrusion additive manufacturing processes for automatic manufacturing error detection. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 115: 3859–3872. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00170-021-07419-2 |
| [80] |
Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL (2021) Modeling, analysis, and optimization of dimensional accuracy of FDM-fabricated parts using definitive screening design and deep learning feedforward artificial neural network. Adv Manuf 9: 115–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40436-020-00336-9 doi: 10.1007/s40436-020-00336-9
|
| [81] |
Park J, Jeon J, Koak S, et al. (2021) Dimensional accuracy and surface characteristics of 3D-printed dental casts. J Prosthet Dent 126: 427–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.008 doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.008
|
| [82] |
Prasong W, Ishigami A, Thumsorn S, et al. (2021) Improvement of interlayer adhesion and heat resistance of biodegradable ternary blend composite 3D printing. Polymers 13: 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13050740 doi: 10.3390/polym13050740
|
| [83] |
Tao Y, Kong F, Li Z, et al. (2021) A review on voids of 3D printed parts by fused filament fabrication. J Mater Res Technol 15: 4860–4879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.10.108 doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.10.108
|
| [84] |
Oskolkov A, Bezukladnikov I, Trushnikov D (2021) Indirect temperature measurement in high frequency heating systems. Sensors 21: 2561. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21072561 doi: 10.3390/s21072561
|
| [85] | Ganganallimath MM, Vizayakumar K, Bhushi UM (2022) Quality improvement of sand castings through implementation of 3D-printing technology. 2022 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), Dubai, United Arab Emirates. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASET53988.2022.9734939 |
| [86] |
Zheng Z, Ali Aghili SM, Wüthrich R (2022) Towards electroforming of copper net-shape parts on fused deposition modeling (FDM) printed mandrels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 122: 1055–1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09837-2 doi: 10.1007/s00170-022-09837-2
|
| [87] | Hamrol A, Cugier M, Osiński F (2022) Identification of the sensitivity of FDM technology to material moisture with a fast test, In: Diering M, Wieczorowski M, Harugade M, et al. Advances in Manufacturing Ⅲ. MANUFACTURING 2022. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03925-6_14 |
| [88] | Spitaels L, Rivière-Lorphèvre E, Demarbaix A, et al. (2022) Dimensional and geometrical performance assessment of two FDM printers using a benchmark artifact. 22nd International Conference and Exhibition. Available from: https://luck.synhera.be/handle/123456789/1705. |
| [89] | Hıra O, Yücedağ S, Samankan S, et al. (2022) Numerical and experimental analysis of optimal nozzle dimensions for FDM printers. Prog Addit Manuf 7: 823–838. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40964-021-00241-y |
| [90] |
Sharmila A, Shantanu P, Saikarthik J (2022) Dimensional accuracy of medical models of the skull produced by three-dimensional printing technology by advanced morphometric analysis. J Anat Soc India 71: 186–190. https://doi.org/10.4103/jasi.jasi_202_21 doi: 10.4103/jasi.jasi_202_21
|
| [91] | Müller T, Elkaseer A, Wadlinger J, et al. (2022) Development of correction factors for FDM 3D printers: Experimental investigation and ANN modelling, In: Scholz SG, Howlett RJ, Setchi R, Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6128-0_30 |
| [92] |
Nugroho WT, Dong Y, Pramanik A (2022) Dimensional accuracy and surface finish of 3D printed polyurethane (PU) dog-bone samples optimally manufactured by fused deposition modelling (FDM). Rapid Prototyping J 28: 1779–1795. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-12-2021-0328 doi: 10.1108/RPJ-12-2021-0328
|
| [93] |
Frunzaverde D, Cojocaru V, Ciubotariu CR, et al. (2022) The influence of the printing temperature and the filament color on the dimensional accuracy, tensile strength, and friction performance of FFF-printed PLA specimens. Polymers 14: 1978. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14101978 doi: 10.3390/polym14101978
|
| [94] |
Lluch-Cerezo J, Meseguer MD, García-Manrique JA, et al. (2022) Influence of thermal annealing temperatures on powder mould effectiveness to avoid deformations in ABS and PLA 3D-printed parts. Polymers 14: 2607. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132607 doi: 10.3390/polym14132607
|
| [95] |
Zuo H, Liu Z, Zhang L, et al. (2022) Self-healing materials enable free-standing seamless large-scale 3D printing. Science China Mater 64: 1791–1800. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40843-020-1603-y doi: 10.1007/s40843-020-1603-y
|
| [96] |
Nguyen P, Stanislaus I, McGahon C, et al. (2023) Quality assurance in 3D-printing: A dimensional accuracy study of patient-specific 3D-printed vascular anatomical models. Front Med Technol 5: 1097850. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2023.1097850 doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2023.1097850
|
| [97] |
Golubovic Z, Trajkovic I, Travica M, et al. (2023) Investigation of thermal and dimensional behavior of 3-D printed materials using thermal imaging and 3-D scanning. Thermal Sci 27: 21–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/TSCI2301021G doi: 10.2298/TSCI2301021G
|
| [98] |
Wang H, Al. Shraida HA, Yu J (2023) Predictive modeling of out-of-plane deviation for the quality improvement of additive manufacturing. Mater Sci Forum 1086: 79–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/p-12034b doi: 10.4028/p-12034b
|
| [99] | Emir E, Bahce E, Uysal A, et al. (2023) Dimensional accuracy of porous structures manufactured using air controller, In: Tonkonogyi V, Ivanov V, Trojanowska J, et al. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16651-8_9 |
| [100] |
Fiedler M, Meyer H, Droeder K (2023) Feasibility analysis of robot-assisted processes for automated tolerance compensation by using additive manufacturing. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E 238: 1545–1553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09544089231160708 doi: 10.1177/09544089231160708
|
| [101] |
Gade S, Vagge S (2023) 3D biomimetic scaffold's dimensional accuracy: A crucial geometrical response for bone tissue engineering. Int J Mater Res 114: 832–843. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijmr-2022-0267 doi: 10.1515/ijmr-2022-0267
|
| [102] |
Koers T, Magyar B (2023) Compensation of the shrinkage behavior occurring in cylindrical components in the FDM process. Macromol Symp 411: 2200185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/masy.202200185 doi: 10.1002/masy.202200185
|
| [103] |
Tu Y, Gong H, Hassan A, et al. (2023) Computer vision-based evaluation of dimensional accuracy for MEAM in new product development. Procedia CIRP 119: 444–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.03.107 doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2023.03.107
|
| [104] | Mohanavel V, Kannan S, Raman M, et al. (2023) Impact of CNT addition on surface roughness and dimensional characteristics of polymer nano-composite fabricated by FDM method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12657-7 |
| [105] |
Grgic I, Karakasic M, Glavas H, et al. (2023) Accuracy of FDM PLA polymer 3D printing technology based on tolerance fields. Processes 11: 11102810. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11102810 doi: 10.3390/pr11102810
|
| [106] |
Guo W, Liu C, Bu W, et al. (2023) 3D printing of polylactic acid/boron nitride bone scaffolds: Mechanical properties, biomineralization ability and cell responses. Ceram Int 49: 25886–25898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.05.137 doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.05.137
|
| [107] |
Guo W, Yang Y, Liu C, et al. (2023) 3D printed TPMS structural PLA/GO scaffold: Process parameter optimization, porous structure, mechanical and biological properties. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 142: 105848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105848 doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105848
|
| [108] |
Guo F, Wang E, Yang Y, et al. (2023) A natural biomineral for enhancing the biomineralization and cell response of 3D printed polylactic acid bone scaffolds. Int J Biol Macromol 242: 124728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124728 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124728
|
| [109] |
Baraheni M, Shabgard MR, Tabatabaee AM (2024) Effects of FDM 3D printing parameters on PLA biomaterial components dimensional accuracy and surface quality. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C 238: 3864–3873. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544062231202142 doi: 10.1177/09544062231202142
|
| [110] |
Aslani K, Kitsakis K, Kechagias JD, et al. (2020) On the application of grey Taguchi method for benchmarking the dimensional accuracy of the PLA fused filament fabrication process. SN Appl Sci 2: 1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2823-z doi: 10.1007/s42452-020-2823-z
|
| [111] |
Hanon MM, Zsidai L, Ma QJ (2021) Accuracy investigation of 3D printed PLA with various process parameters and different colors. Mater Today Proc 42: 3089–3096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.1246 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.1246
|
| [112] |
Agarwal KM, Shubham P, Bhatia D, et al. (2022) Analyzing the impact of print parameters on dimensional variation of ABS specimens printed using fused deposition modelling (FDM). Sensors Int 3: 100149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100149 doi: 10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100149
|
| [113] |
Tiwari K, Kumar S (2018) Analysis of the factors affecting the dimensional accuracy of 3D printed products. Mater Today Proc 5: 18674–18680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.213 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.213
|
| [114] |
Kim J, Ko J (2021) A parameter study to improve dimensional accuracy of FDM-type 3D printer based on various filaments. J Adv Mar Eng Technol 45: 60–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.5916/jamet.2021.45.2.60 doi: 10.5916/jamet.2021.45.2.60
|
Figures(10) / Tables(3)
Azhar Equbal, Ramesh Murmu, Veenit Kumar, Md. Asif Equbal. A recent review on advancements in dimensional accuracy in fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2024, 11(5): 950-990. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024046
DownLoad: