This study deals with an experimental investigation of the thermal performance of a prototype mechanical wet cooling tower with a counter flow arrangement. Different volume concentrations ranging from 0.18 to 0.50 vol.% of stable Al oxide (Al2O3), Zn oxide (ZnO), and Ti oxide (Ti2O3) nanoparticles of 80, 35, and 70 nm diameter were considered. Water was taken as a base fluid, and the experiment was carried out at 60, 70, and 80 ℃, respectively, in laboratory conditions. The study revealed that an increase in the volume concentration of the nanofluids increased the cooling range, cooling efficiency, convective heat transfer coefficient, tower characteristic called number of transfer unit (NTU), and effectiveness of the cooling tower compared with water at the same mass flow rate and inlet temperature. However, increasing the volume concentration increased the viscosity of the nanofluids, leading to an increase in friction factor. For instance, for 0.18% volume concentration of ZnO, at an inlet water temperature of 66.4 ℃ and water/air (L/G) flow ratio of 1.93, the cooling range increased by 3.62%, cooling efficiency increased by 33.3%, and NTU increased by 50.5% compared with fresh water (FW).
Citation: Habibur Rahman, Altab Hossain, Mohammad Ali. Experimental investigation on cooling tower performance with Al2O3, ZnO and Ti2O3 based nanofluids[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2024, 11(5): 935-949. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024045
This study deals with an experimental investigation of the thermal performance of a prototype mechanical wet cooling tower with a counter flow arrangement. Different volume concentrations ranging from 0.18 to 0.50 vol.% of stable Al oxide (Al2O3), Zn oxide (ZnO), and Ti oxide (Ti2O3) nanoparticles of 80, 35, and 70 nm diameter were considered. Water was taken as a base fluid, and the experiment was carried out at 60, 70, and 80 ℃, respectively, in laboratory conditions. The study revealed that an increase in the volume concentration of the nanofluids increased the cooling range, cooling efficiency, convective heat transfer coefficient, tower characteristic called number of transfer unit (NTU), and effectiveness of the cooling tower compared with water at the same mass flow rate and inlet temperature. However, increasing the volume concentration increased the viscosity of the nanofluids, leading to an increase in friction factor. For instance, for 0.18% volume concentration of ZnO, at an inlet water temperature of 66.4 ℃ and water/air (L/G) flow ratio of 1.93, the cooling range increased by 3.62%, cooling efficiency increased by 33.3%, and NTU increased by 50.5% compared with fresh water (FW).
[1] | Marco M, Francesco M, Gianpiero C, et al. (2022) Experimental evaluation of a full-scale HVAC system working with nanofluid. Energies 15: 2902. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15082902 doi: 10.3390/en15082902 |
[2] | Gao M, Sun F, Wang K, et al. (2008) Experimental research of heat transfer performance on natural draft counter flow wet cooling tower under cross-wind conditions. Int J Therm Sci 47: 935–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2007.07.010 doi: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2007.07.010 |
[3] | Jaber H, Webb RL (1989) Design of cooling towers by the effectiveness-NTU method. J Heat Transfer 111: 837–843. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3250794 doi: 10.1115/1.3250794 |
[4] | Yoo SY, Kim JH, Han KH (2010) Thermal performance analysis of heat exchanger for closed wet cooling tower using heat and mass transfer analogy. J Mech Sci Technol 24: 893–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-010-0208-8 doi: 10.1007/s12206-010-0208-8 |
[5] | Gianpiero C, Favale E, Marco M, et al. (2017) Cooling of electronic devices: Nanofluids contribution. Appl Therm Eng 127: 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.08.042 doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.08.042 |
[6] | Gianpiero C, Favale E, Paola M, et al. (2017) Thermal conductivity, viscosity and stability of Al2O3-diathermic oil nanofluids for solar energy systems. Energy 95: 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.11.032 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.11.032 |
[7] | Marco M, Fabrizio I, Gianpiero C, et al. (2016) An investigation of layering phenomenon at the liquid-solid interface in Cu and CuO based nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 103: 564–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.07.082 doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.07.082 |
[8] | Fabrizio I, Marco M, Gianpiero C, et al. (2016) An explanation of the Al2O3 nanofluid thermal conductivity based on the phonon theory of liquid. Energy 116: 786–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.027 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.027 |
[9] | Fisenko SP, Brin AA (2007) Simulation of a cross-flow cooling tower performance. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 50: 3216–3223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.05.028 doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.05.028 |
[10] | Naik BK, Choudhary V, Muthukumar P, et al. (2017) Performance assessment of a counter flow cooling tower—Unique approach. Energy Procedia 109: 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.056 doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.056 |
[11] | Shahali P, Rahmati M, Alavi SR, et al. (2016) Experimental study on improving operating conditions of wet cooling towers using various rib numbers of packing. Int J Refrig 65: 80–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2015.12.004 doi: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2015.12.004 |
[12] | Afshari F, Dehghanpour H (2019) A review study on cooling towers; types, performance and application. International Conference on Nuclear Structure Properties, Trabzon, Turkey. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327830964. |
[13] | Jagadeesh T, Reddy KS (2013) Performance analysis of the natural draft cooling tower in different seasons. IOSR-JMCE 7: 19–23. https://doi.org/10.9790/1684-0751923 doi: 10.9790/1684-0751923 |
[14] | Khairul MA, Alim MA, Mahbubul IM, et al. (2014) Heat transfer performance and exergy analyses of a corrugated plate heat exchanger using metal oxide nanofluids. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 50: 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2013.11.006 doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2013.11.006 |
[15] | Mofrad PI, Heris SZ, Shanbedi M (2018) Experimental investigation of the effect of different nanofluids on the thermal performance of a wet cooling tower using a new method for equalization of ambient conditions. Energy Convers Manage 158: 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.056 doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.056 |
[16] | Nakhjavani SH, Zadeh MAA (2020) Flow boiling heat transfer characteristics of titanium oxide/water nanofluid (TiO2/DI water) in an annular heat exchanger. J Therm Eng 6: 592–603. https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.764300 doi: 10.18186/thermal.764300 |
[17] | Khairul A, Saidur R, Rahman MM, et al. (2013) Heat transfer and thermodynamic analyses of helically coiled heat exchanger using different type of nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 67: 398–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.08.030 doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.08.030 |
[18] | Khairul MA, Hossain A, Saidur R, et al. (2014) Prediction of heat transfer performance of CuO/water nanofluids flow in spirally corrugated helically coiled heat exchanger using Fuzzy Logic Technique. Comput Fluids 100: 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.05.007 doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.05.007 |
[19] | Nasir FM, Mohamad AY (2016) Heat transfer of CuO-water based nanofluids in a compact heat exchanger. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 11: 2517–2523. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311796854. |
[20] | Bakhtiyar N, Esmaeili KS, Javadpour R, et al. (2023) Experimental investigation of indirect heat transfer through a novel designed lab-scale setup using functionalized MWCNTs nanofluids (MWCNTs-COOH/water and MWCNTs-OH/water). Case Stud Therm Eng 45: 102951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2023.102951 doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2023.102951 |
[21] | Bakhtiyar NK, Javadpour R, Heris SZ, et al. (2022) Improving the thermal characteristics of a cooling tower by replacing the operating fluid with functionalized and non-functionalized aqueous MWCNT nanofluids. Case Stud Therm Eng 39: 102422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2022.102422 doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2022.102422 |
[22] | Javadpour R, Heris SZ, Mohammadfam Y (2021) Optimizing the effect of concentration and flow rate of water/MWCNTs nanofluid on the performance of a forced draft cross-flow cooling tower. Energy 217: 119420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119420 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119420 |
[23] | Javadpour R, Heris SZ, Mohammadfam Y, et al. (2022) Optimizing the heat transfer characteristics of MWCNTs and TiO2 water-based nanofluids through a novel designed pilot-scale setup. Sci Rep 12: 15154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19196-3 doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19196-3 |
[24] | Fabrizio I, Marco M, Gianpiero C, et al. (2019) A critical analysis of clustering phenomenon in Al2O3 nanofluids, J Therm Anal Calorimetry 135: 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7099-9 doi: 10.1007/s10973-018-7099-9 |
[25] | Francesco M, Marco M, Gianpiero C, et al. (2018) Experimental investigation on 4-strokes biodiesel engine cooling system based on nanofluid. Renew Energy 125: 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.110 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.110 |
[26] | Gianpiero C, Marco M, Arturo R (2017) Numerical simulation of thermal efficiency of an innovative Al2O3 nanofluid solar thermal collector: Influence of nanoparticles concentration. Therm Sci 21: 2769–2779. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI151207168C doi: 10.2298/TSCI151207168C |
[27] | Rahman H, Hossain A, Ali M (2019) Experimental analysis on heat transfer performance of cooling tower with nanofluid. AIP Conf Proc 2121: 070011. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5115918 doi: 10.1063/1.5115918 |
[28] | Rahman H, Hossain A, Ali M (2021) Heat transfer performance prediction of a cooling tower with nanofluid using fuzzy expert system. JP J Heat Mass Transfer 22: 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.17654/HM022010001 doi: 10.17654/HM022010001 |
[29] | Deshmukh SA, Glicksman L, Norford L (2020) Non-intrusive cooling tower model validation: Results from a case study. Sci Technol Built En 26: 1204–1215. https://doi.org/10.1080/23744731.2020.1778401 doi: 10.1080/23744731.2020.1778401 |
[30] | Merkel F (1925) Evaporative cooling. VDI 70: 123–128. |
[31] | Aich N, Tuttle JP, Lead JR, et al. (2014) A critical review of nanohybrids: Synthesis, applications and environmental implications. Environ Chem 11: 609–623. https://doi.org/10.1071/EN14127 doi: 10.1071/EN14127 |
[32] | Yu W, Xie H (2012) A review on nanofluids: Preparation, stability mechanisms, and applications. J Nanomater 2012: 4352873. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/435873 doi: 10.1155/2012/435873 |
[33] | Choi SUS, Eastman JA (1995) Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. 1995 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exhibition, San Francisco, United States. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236353373. |
[34] | Darain KM, Jumaat MZ, Hossain MA, et al. (2015) Automated serviceability prediction of NSM strengthened structure using a fuzzy logic expert system. Expert Syst Appl 42: 376–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.07.058 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.07.058 |