
Microplastics (MPs) pose a substantial challenge to the environment and have life-threatening implications for organisms, including humans. To overcome this challenge, several investigations have been conducted, including adsorption with a specific absorbent, manual and modified sand filtration columns, and ultrafiltration using polymers. However, microplastic removal using these methods remains limited in certain cases; hence, an optimal method is required to separate MPs from water. The aim of this study was to remove MPs from community water wells in Banda Aceh, Indonesia, using a polyether sulfone (PES) membrane modified with poloxamer surfactants and patchouli oil. Membranes were created using the phase inversion method to form an asymmetrical structure with a top-to-bottom pore distribution. Community well water samples were collected from numerous points in Banda Aceh City. This was followed by analysis before and after filtration using a microscope and FTIR spectroscopy to determine the shape and type of MPs. The results revealed fiber- and film-shaped MPs detected in the well water of each community examined in this study. The FTIR analysis demonstrated that MP contamination was dominated by polyethylene and polypropylene plastics, consistent with the trend observed across Asia. Nonetheless, MP contamination could be eliminated by an ultrafiltration process using a membrane. In this study, the removal of MPs using the membrane delivered significant results. Pure PES membranes can eliminate up to 87.5% of MPs from water samples. However, the PES membrane containing poloxamer and patchouli oil delivered 100% rejection.
Citation: Nasrul Arahman, Cut Meurah Rosnelly, Sri Mulyati, Wafiq Alni Dzulhijjah, Nur Halimah, Rinal Dia'ul Haikal, Syahril Siddiq, Sharfina Maulidayanti, Muhammad Aziz, Mathias Ulbricht. Investigation of microplastics in community well water in Banda Aceh, Indonesia: a separation technique using polyethersulfone-poloxamer membrane[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2025, 12(1): 53-71. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2025003
[1] | Abigail W. Porter, Sarah J. Wolfson, Lily. Young . Pharmaceutical transforming microbes from wastewater and natural environments can colonize microplastics. AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(1): 99-116. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020006 |
[2] | Chetan Dhokai, Ritesh Ramesh Palkar, Vicky Jain . Water saving in thermal power plant by use of membrane filter in cooling tower treatment. AIMS Environmental Science, 2022, 9(3): 282-292. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2022020 |
[3] | Fabiana Carriera, Cristina Di Fiore, Pasquale Avino . Trojan horse effects of microplastics: A mini-review about their role as a vector of organic and inorganic compounds in several matrices. AIMS Environmental Science, 2023, 10(5): 732-742. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2023040 |
[4] | Judith S. Weis . Improving microplastic research. AIMS Environmental Science, 2019, 6(5): 326-340. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2019.5.326 |
[5] | B. Ravit, K. Cooper, G. Moreno, B. Buckley, I. Yang, A. Deshpande, S. Meola, D. Jones, A. Hsieh . Microplastics in urban New Jersey freshwaters: distribution, chemical identification, and biological affects. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(6): 809-826. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.6.809 |
[6] | Mahidin, Asri Gani, Saiful, Muhammad Irham, Wulan Windari, Erdiwansyah . An overview of the potential risks, sources, and analytical methods for microplastics in soil. AIMS Environmental Science, 2022, 9(2): 185-216. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2022013 |
[7] | B. Ravit, K. Cooper, B. Buckley, I. Yang, A. Deshpande . Organic compounds associated with microplastic pollutants in New Jersey, U.S.A. surface waters. AIMS Environmental Science, 2019, 6(6): 445-459. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2019.6.445 |
[8] | Gina M. Moreno, Keith R. Cooper . Morphometric effects of various weathered and virgin/pure microplastics on sac fry zebrafish (Danio rerio). AIMS Environmental Science, 2021, 8(3): 204-220. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2021014 |
[9] | Katharina Meixner, Mona Kubiczek, Ines Fritz . Microplastic in soil–current status in Europe with special focus on method tests with Austrian samples. AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(2): 174-191. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020011 |
[10] | Zhe Yang, Jun Yin, Baolin Deng . Enhancing water flux of thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) membrane by incorporation of bimodal silica nanoparticles. AIMS Environmental Science, 2016, 3(2): 185-198. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2016.2.185 |
Microplastics (MPs) pose a substantial challenge to the environment and have life-threatening implications for organisms, including humans. To overcome this challenge, several investigations have been conducted, including adsorption with a specific absorbent, manual and modified sand filtration columns, and ultrafiltration using polymers. However, microplastic removal using these methods remains limited in certain cases; hence, an optimal method is required to separate MPs from water. The aim of this study was to remove MPs from community water wells in Banda Aceh, Indonesia, using a polyether sulfone (PES) membrane modified with poloxamer surfactants and patchouli oil. Membranes were created using the phase inversion method to form an asymmetrical structure with a top-to-bottom pore distribution. Community well water samples were collected from numerous points in Banda Aceh City. This was followed by analysis before and after filtration using a microscope and FTIR spectroscopy to determine the shape and type of MPs. The results revealed fiber- and film-shaped MPs detected in the well water of each community examined in this study. The FTIR analysis demonstrated that MP contamination was dominated by polyethylene and polypropylene plastics, consistent with the trend observed across Asia. Nonetheless, MP contamination could be eliminated by an ultrafiltration process using a membrane. In this study, the removal of MPs using the membrane delivered significant results. Pure PES membranes can eliminate up to 87.5% of MPs from water samples. However, the PES membrane containing poloxamer and patchouli oil delivered 100% rejection.
One of the most invaluable and vital resources in human life is the availability of clean water of adequate quantity and quality. Consequently, water scarcity has become a pressing global concern. This scarcity of clean water is worsened by the sub-standard quality of raw water due to plastic waste pollution resulting from human activities. Currently, a significant challenge to the global community is the decreasing quality of raw water due to microplastics (MPs) pollution. The issue of MPs has gained considerable attention, considering the crucial role of water in sustaining life and the impact of MPs on the environment. MPs are particles of synthetic polymers with a diameter of less than 5 mm, granular, film, fragment, and foam-shaped, and resistant to biodegradation processes. Certain plastic materials commonly found in waste that can contaminate water bodies include polypropylene, polyethylene, polystyrene, polyvinyl chloride, polycarbonate, polyamide, polyester, and polyethylene terephthalate [1,2,3].
MPs can be found in water through fragmentation processes, as by-products of the plastic processing industry, and in wastewater discharged into the environment [4,5]. Generally, MPs are classified according to their morphological characteristics, such as size, which significantly affect their survival. MPs can release chemicals rapidly, especially when their surface area is large, as is the case for smaller particles. With decreased particle size, MPs can likely accumulate in humans, potentially causing health problems, such as inflammation, a damaged immune system, toxicity, hormonal imbalance, increased risk of heart disease and infertility, and obesity [6]. Chemicals that are toxic to the environment, such as persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances (PBTs) and persistent organic pollutants (POPs), have the potential to be absorbed by plastics with a substantial impact. Moreover, the health risks associated with MPs depend on the ingested amount and duration in the gut. Recent studies have confirmed that MPs can penetrate the body and cause hormonal imbalance, infertility, obesity, and an increased risk of heart disease [7].
In the past five years, various countries have reported the use of MP-contaminated raw water sources. The results indicate that the distribution of MPs includes contaminated surface water, groundwater, and raw water treated to provide clean water [8,9,10,11]. A thorough investigation of MP-contaminated raw water sources was performed by Li and co-workers [12] in China. The authors analyzed 79 sewage sludge flow points from 28 sources of industrial waste treatment plants in 28 provinces. The results confirmed that all sludge samples contained MPs with an average concentration of 22.7 ± 12.1 × 103 particles per kg of dry sludge [12]. The results revealed that the MP content in the sludge from industrial effluent treatment significantly contributed to groundwater pollution. Similarly, Fuller and Gautam [13] reported that MP content in the soil of industrial areas in Sydney ranged from 300 to 67,500 mg kg-1 [13]. The results of other groundwater pollution studies in China confirmed an average of 317 particles per 500 g (dry weight) of mud.
The issue of limited access to clean water is also a significant challenge throughout Indonesia, including in Banda Aceh City on the western edge of Sumatra. Notwithstanding the efforts of the state company PDAM, clean water production has failed to meet Banda Aceh's increasing demand. Accordingly, several urban communities depend on shallow dug-through water to meet their daily water requirements, such as washing, bathing, cooking, and drinking. The direct use of well water that has not experienced treatment processes poses a considerable risk to human health because of the inability to meet clean water quality standards in terms of physical, chemical, and biological properties [14].
Currently, there are indications of water stream pollution caused by plastic waste in the coastal waters of Banda Aceh and Aceh Besar [15,16]. Over time, the accretion and deterioration of plastic waste can generate microplastic pollutants that contaminate groundwater, posing health hazards to humans and other living organisms. Given that numerous Banda Aceh residents continue to rely on well water for their household's clean water needs, it is imperative to assess the suitability of well water, particularly regarding contamination by microplastic particles. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the distribution of MPs in shallow groundwater within the area surrounding Banda Aceh, particularly focusing on communities using well water for washing, bathing, and cooking. Moreover, this study devised a membrane-based method for separating microplastic particles from well water samples.
The MP removal process was performed using several methods, including manual filtration, which produced suboptimal results [17]. Conventional methods such as adsorption have low selectivity for microplastics, whereas coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation generally use high concentrations of chemicals to achieve the best performance, which can have adverse health effects. Bioremediation is also commonly used to remove MPs in water; however, this process is time-consuming and has low removal efficiency [18]. Furthermore, the filtration process involves using filter paper with pores between 20 and 25 μm, allowing the filtration of MPs of sizes up to several dozen microns. However, such large pore sizes are ineffective for capturing MPs in the range of a few microns or nanometers. Although micro (0.1–1 μm), ultra (2–100 nm), and nanofiltration (~2 nm) methods have promising applications for filtering micro- and nanoplastics, they also have certain limitations. These include slow filtration and pore blockage due to small pore sizes, the need for high pressure during filtration, which increases the cost and energy consumption, and regeneration requiring high-pressure recoil technology, which consequently complicates the recovery process [19].
Membrane technology has been introduced as a promising alternative for water treatment [20], wastewater treatment [21], and removal of microplastics from water samples owing to its high removal efficiency, simple operation, continuous separation, simultaneous separation of MPs from water, and adjustable membrane properties [22]. Pizzichetti et al. reported that using commercial membranes, such as polycarbonate (PC), cellulose acetate (CA), and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), can effectively remove MPs, but particles in the range of 20–300 μm pass through membrane pores and accumulate inside the permeate tank [23,24]. In addition, membrane separation is commonly used in water treatment processes to minimize the presence of micropollutants because of its low energy consumption; however, energy consumption is strongly influenced by impurities, flow rate, pressure, and impurity concentration. Therefore, adjustments are needed to modify the characteristics and properties of the membrane by adding hydrophilic additives [25] to achieve efficient MP removal by membranes [1]. In this study, a polymeric blend membrane was proposed as a separation technique for MPs from water samples. Four types of modified polyethersulfone membranes with different concentrations of additives were set on the cross-flow filtration module. The removal efficiency of microplastic particles by membrane type is comprehensively discussed.
This study was conducted in Banda Aceh City, Aceh Province, Indonesia, which is situated on the westernmost point of Sumatra Island, Indonesia, as shown in Figure 1. In this study, a total of four water sampling points across four districts were selected: Meuraxa, Kuta Alam, Kuta Raja, and Syiah Kuala. These districts represent densely populated coastal areas. Their coordinates were measured by a global positioning system (GPS). An overview of the sampling points is presented in Figure 1, and data are described in Table 1.
Sample code | District | Latitude | Longitude |
1 | Meuraxa | 5°33'51.02"U | 95°18'7.66"T |
2 | Kuta Alam | 5°33'47.61"U | 95°19'43.49"T |
3 | Kuta Raja | 5°34'39.11"U | 95°19'11.67"T |
4 | Syiah Kuala | 5°35'48.53"U | 95°20'46.53"T |
Water sampling was conducted at four locations using a horizontal water sampler while adhering to the Indonesian National Standard (SNI 6989.58: 2008). Samples were taken at a depth of 20 cm below the water surface to avoid surface microlayers and 20 cm above the bottom of the well, with careful consideration to avoid sediment deposits. Subsequently, 1 L of water was collected in a sample container and forwarded to the laboratory for analysis to determine the type and number of MPs.
Before analyzing the MP content, water samples were treated as previously described with slight modifications [26,27]. Water samples were oxidized with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 30%) and ferrous sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4·7H2O) to remove organic compounds present in the water sample. 20 mL each of H2O2 and FeSO4·7H2O were added to 100 mL of water sample. The solution mixture was heated on a hotplate for approximately 30 min. The solution was then left to stand at room temperature for 1 h until the sediment completely settled at the bottom of the glass beaker. Subsequently, water and sediment were separated using a vacuum filtration system with a 3-branch glass funnel equipped with a 0.2 µm membrane filter. The membrane filter was placed in a Petri dish wrapped in aluminum foil and placed in a desiccator for 24 h.
Quality control and quality assurance are crucial aspects of microplastic analysis research. The goal is to ensure that MP data are genuinely accurate and free from contamination by MP particles originating from the surrounding research environment [28,29]. All steps involved in sampling, processing, and analyzing the samples adhered to quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) protocols. Cotton clothing and gloves were used to prevent potential fiber contamination from the surrounding air.
Sampling: The horizontal water sampler was constructed from stainless steel. This ensures that water samples are collected without touching human hands or any plastic materials. After collection, the water sample was stored in glass bottles sealed with aluminum caps.
Treatment: All containers used during the oxidation process were glassware, specifically beakers, measuring cylinders, Erlenmeyer flasks, and Petri dishes. Prior to use, each piece of equipment was washed with distilled water and then dried upside down in an oven. Once dry, the equipment was stored after being sealed with aluminum foil.
Analyzing: The surface of the sample channel on the microscope and the FTIR spectra were rinsed three times with distilled water and wiped before examination. Blank analysis (distilled water) was performed to ensure that the samples were not contaminated by laboratory equipment.
MP content in well water samples was observed using a light binocular microscope with magnification adjusted to the object and then visually identified. Digital images were recorded, and the number of MPs was calculated manually. The parameter obtained for abundance level was the number of particles per liter. The MP concentration was calculated using Eq 1 [30].
Concentration = The counted number of MPs particles (particle)Volume of Sample (mL) | (1) |
The types of MPs present in the well water samples were analyzed using the polymer functional group method and were detected using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The infrared (IR) spectra of each of the water samples were recorded at a wavenumber of 500–4000 cm-1 and at a resolution of 2 cm-1 [30]. The types of MPs present in the water samples were identified by studying the recorded IR spectra and referring to standard functional polymer groups. The FTIR analysis procedure was described elsewhere in our previous study [21].
Four types of flat sheet membranes were fabricated as described in detail in previous works [31]. The membranes were fabricated using polyether sulfone (PES), poloxamer (P188), patchouli oil (PO), and N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP). The details of the membrane and its composition are given in Table 2. Cross-flow filtration was performed to separate MPs from the water samples. The procedure was described in our previous study [32]. The water samples were passed through a membrane module via cross-flow filtration using a membrane layer at an operating pressure of 1 bar [33]. The permeate was collected after ultrafiltration for 30 min. MP content in well water before and after filtration was measured using a light binocular microscope. The rejection coefficient of the MP particles by the membrane was calculated using Equation 2.
Rm=(1−CpCf)×100% | (2) |
Membrane code | Material (wt%) | Characteristic | |||||
PES | P-188 | PO | NMP | Porosity (%) | Water contact angle (°) | Water flux (L/m2.h) | |
MPO0 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 84 | 53.8 | 70.4 | 25.3 |
MPO1 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 80 | 64.5 | 52.7 | 83.2 |
MPO3 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 78 | 69.9 | 46.0 | 90.7 |
MPO7 | 16 | 3 | 7 | 74 | 73.2 | 39.7 | 151.9 |
Here, Rm = MPs rejection percentage (%), Cp = concentration of MPs in the feed (MPs/L), and Cf = concentration of MPs in the permeate (MPs/L) [34]. The transmembrane pressure was set to 1.0 bar for all filtration experiments.
The abundance and contamination of MPs in well water were examined qualitatively and quantitatively. Qualitative analysis confirmed the presence of MPs in each community well water sample, as evidenced by an abundance test using a binocular light microscope. Observations were made using different microscope magnifications depending on the object, as exhibited in Table 3.
No | Sampling point | Particle/mL | Average size (µm) |
1 | Syiah Kuala | 70 | 0.94–536 |
2 | Kuta Alam | 23 | 1.02–804 |
3 | Kuta Raja | 22 | 1.74–414 |
4 | Meuraxa | 15 | 2.77–1223 |
MP particles varying in number and size were identified in all water samples. Based on Table 3, the MP data for each sample demonstrated that Syiah Kuala contained the highest amount of particles (70 particles/mL). This was attributed to the presence of numerous MPs carried by currents from the sea and the population density level. In particular, community activities and population density have a considerable influence on MP pollution because the level of plastic waste tends to be greater in densely populated areas.
MPs come in various shapes and display physical characteristics that help determine the type of plastic present in the well water samples, as shown in Table 4. A previous study has shown that the origin and entry path of MPs play a significant role in shaping their form. MP fragments are primarily derived from anthropogenic sources, such as household waste, whereas film-shaped MPs, with flexible and thin physical characteristics, originate from degraded pieces of single-use plastic bags. [24]. Additionally, fiber-shaped MPs are derived from rope fibers and are typically extremely small. These include synthetic fabrics released by washing, fishing nets, industrial raw materials, household appliances, and weathering plastic products. This phenomenon is common in residential areas, as observed at the sampling points. Coastal residential areas in Banda Aceh have a significant potential to generate plastic waste, particularly in the form of bags and food or beverage packaging [15,16].
No. | Sampling point | MPs | Shape |
1. | Syiah Kuala | ![]() |
Fragment |
![]() |
Fiber | ||
![]() |
Colorful fiber | ||
![]() |
Transparent fiber | ||
![]() |
Film | ||
![]() |
Granule | ||
2. | Kuta Alam | ![]() |
Fragment |
![]() |
Fiber and granule | ||
![]() |
Colorful fiber | ||
![]() |
Fiber | ||
3. | Kuta Raja | ![]() |
Fragment |
![]() |
Fiber | ||
![]() |
Transparent and colorful fiber | ||
![]() |
Film | ||
4. | Meuraxa | ![]() |
Fragment |
![]() |
Film | ||
![]() |
Fiber | ||
![]() |
Colorful fiber | ||
![]() |
Transparent fiber |
In this study, the shape of the MPs found in each of the four samples collected from community well water was dominated by colorful fibers and fragments, followed by transparent fiber, fiber, and film, as shown in Table 4. These results are consistent with those reported in a previous study [35]. Microplastic particles (MPs) have highly variable morphologies and are described as fiber (thread-like), fragments (broken), granules (round), and films (sheet-like). Identifying the morphological types of MPs is crucial for identifying the origin of microplastics so that the problem can be addressed. For instance, fiber MPs can come from textiles and ropes, whereas fragments or films can come from plastic bags or bottles [36]. In addition, knowing the type of microplastics will also facilitate their removal from water, especially through the use of membrane technology to separate MPs. The concept of membrane separation is based on pore size; thus, the particle size of microplastics significantly affects the fouling of the membrane. MPs with particle sizes larger than the pore size tend to clog the pores on the membrane surface and form a cake layer, while MPs with smaller sizes can block the pores inside the membrane, which cannot be recovered [37].
In this case, fiber, film, and fragment types of MPs easily cover the membrane pore surface due to their large particle dimensions. Although fiber MPs have a very small width (x-dimension), their length (y-dimension) can surpass that of films or fragments because of their elongated shape. Fragment and granular types present the greatest challenge for separating MPs using membranes, as their small and irregular sizes can cause blockages in membrane pores, affecting filtration performance (decrease in flux and rejection). As shown in Table 7, fragment-type MPs dominate the MPs found after the filtration process.
The MPs in the well water samples were reviewed by qualitative analysis using FTIR spectroscopy to determine the functional groups in the compounds or materials. The IR spectra of the well water samples were studied using various standard polymer spectra for polymer types (Figure 2).
The results were analyzed for functional groups using a standard polymer spectrum. Interpretation of the FTIR spectra shown in Figure 2 is presented in Table 5. Based on Table 5, the results of the FTIR analysis of well water samples exhibited bonds that were close to the standard wavelengths for polymer types of polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), polyethylene glycol (PEG), polystyrene (PS), and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) [38]. Polyethylene is a polymer sourced from plastic bags and packaging commonly found in water [39].
No. | Sample | Wavenumber | Bonding | Plastic types |
1. | Syiah Kuala | 2958.8 | C-H | PP |
2920.2 | N-H | PE | ||
2846.9 | C-H | PE | ||
1635.6 | C-H | PS | ||
1377.2 | C-H | PP | ||
719.4 | CH2 | LDPE | ||
2. | Kuta Alam | 3252.0 | O-H | LDPE |
2966.5 | C-H | PE | ||
1635.6 | C-H | PS | ||
1462.0 | C-H | PP | ||
1396.5 | O-H | LDPE | ||
1377.2 | C-H | PP | ||
719.4 | CH2 | LDPE | ||
3. | Kuta Raja | 2345.4 | C-H | PE |
2112.0 | C-H | PE | ||
1635.6 | C-H | PS | ||
1462.0 | C-H | PP | ||
1396.5 | O-H | LDPE | ||
1377.2 | C-H | PP | ||
1342.5 | C-O | PEG | ||
719.4 | C-H | LDPE | ||
4. | Meuraxa | 1635.6 | H-C-H | PEG |
1462.0 | C-H | PP | ||
1396.5 | O-H | LDPE | ||
1377.2 | C-H | PP | ||
717.5 | Benzene derivative | PS |
The peaks obtained at wavenumber 1462 cm-1 and 1377 cm-1, in addition to 2920 cm-1 and 2846 cm-1, represent the functional groups of PE and PP [4]. In shallow groundwater, MP contamination can originate from the sanitary conditions of a community that undertakes activities such as bathing and washing, which can affect the abundance of MPs. This is because washing activities can produce fibers from clothes, or the incorrect disposal of detergents and plastic waste. The results indicate that all well water samples tested were contaminated with MPs. The samples from Kuta Raja had the highest level of contamination.
Membrane performance was examined by filtering well water contaminated with MPs. Based on the results presented in Table 6, it can be noted that the four membranes exhibit good MP rejection performance, with a rejection percentage of 82%–100%. Microplastics in community well water in Syiah Kuala and Kutaraja were eliminated. This occurred because such microplastics were larger in size than the membrane pores; hence, they could be completely removed [40]. Unfortunately, traces of MP residues were still observed in community well water samples after the filtration process, specifically in Kuta Alam, where 2 particles/mL were detected ranging in size from 118 to 143 mm. The community well water sample obtained from Meuraxa contained small MPs (1 particle/mL) measuring 195 µm in size.
No. | Sample | Membrane | Size (µm) | Remark | Rejection (%) | ||
x | y | z | |||||
1 | Syiah Kuala | MPO0 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 |
MPO1 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO3 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO7 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
2 | Kuta Alam | MPO0 | 143 | 86 | 129 | Exist | 82 |
118 | 85 | 103 | Exist | ||||
MPO1 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO3 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO7 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
3 | Kuta Raja | MPO0 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 |
MPO1 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO3 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO7 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
4 | Meuraxa | MPO0 | 195 | 33 | Exist | 87.5 | |
MPO1 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO3 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO7 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 |
The types of microplastics identified after filtration are presented in Table 7. Only two types of microplastic shapes were recovered after filtration: fragments and fibers. The inability of microplastics to be rejected is significantly affected by their size and abundance in water. For instance, the fragment shape noticed in Kuta Alam after filtration can be caused by the abundance of fragment shapes in community wells, possibly because of the use of synthetic ropes. In the Murata sample, fiber-type microplastics could pass through the membrane. This occurred because the size at the upper end of the microplastic is smaller than the membrane pore; thus, this type of microplastic is vulnerable to pass through a membrane even after filtration [1,41].
No. | Sample | Shape | |
1. | Kuta Alam 2: A Day of Learning | ![]() |
Fragment |
2. | Meuraxa 1 | ![]() |
Colorful fiber |
The microplastics successfully passed through the membrane stemmed from MPO0, a pristine membrane that does not contain additives. This was closely related to the membrane surface pore size, which was larger (Table 6). The membrane surface denotes dark circles with larger diameters than the other three types of membranes. In accordance with a previous study [42], the inability of microplastics to be rejected was clearly influenced by the membrane pore. Hence, to improve the rejection performance, the membrane pore should be modified. In water treatment containing a membrane, the flux and rejection coefficient should be directly proportional. Therefore, an increase in the concentration of additives in the membrane generates an increase in the flux of pure water [43] and the rejection coefficient [44].
A simple economic feasibility analysis was conducted by comparing the use of consumables in this study with commercial membranes available on the market. Based on the analysis, the MPO0 (PES) and MPO7 (PES/P-188/PO) membranes cost $3.20 and $3.37, respectively (all prices obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, October 2024), with a size of 100 × 200 mm. In comparison, the commercial PES membrane is priced at $27 with a size of 200 × 200 mm. The results indicate that the fabricated membranes are significantly cheaper than commercial membranes. This suggests that the fabricated membrane is feasible for use in the microplastic separation process. In addition to delivering satisfactory performance, the membrane offers a very affordable price, making it suitable for long-term use.
In conclusion, this study successfully investigated MP removal from community well water in Banda Aceh. The results confirmed that contamination by MPs was most commonly unearthed in samples collected from Kuta Raja. Observations employing a microscope showed that the dominant shape was fibers originating from rope fibers and synthetic fabrics commonly found in washing clothes, fishing nets, industrial raw materials, household appliances, and weathering plastic products. FTIR analysis proved that MP contamination was primarily composed of the two most prevalent types of MPs found on the Asian continent, specifically polyethylene and polypropylene plastic. This study also established that MP contamination could be eliminated via ultrafiltration using a membrane, with pure PES producing a rejection value of 87.5%. However, the PES membrane with the addition of poloxamer and patchouli oil produced a 100% rejection value due to the hydrophilicity effect. This phenomenon contributed to equal pore distribution characterized by a substantial number of small pores, thereby increasing the selectivity of membranes for MP removal.
Conceptualization, N.A.; Data curation, R.D.H.; Formal analysis, R.D.H., S.M.; Investigation, W.A.D., N.H., S.S.; Project administration, C.M.R, S.M.; Supervision, N.A., C.M.R., S.M., I.R., Writing – original draft, W.A.D., R.D.H, ; Writing – review and editing, N.A., M.A., M.U.
This research was financially supported by the Universitas Syiah Kuala (USK) under a "Penelitian Profesor"Research Grant (166/UN11/SPK/PNBP/2021). Improvement of the research outcomes was supported by the Equity Program, World Class University of the USK. Therefore, the LPPM and WCU equity of USK are acknowledged for their valuable support.
The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript.
[1] |
Poerio M, Piacentini E, Mazzei R (2019) Membrane Processes for Microplastic Removal. Molecules 24: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24224148 doi: 10.3390/molecules24224148
![]() |
[2] |
Pandey P, Dhiman M, Kansal A, et al (2023) Plastic waste management for sustainable environment: techniques and approaches. Waste Dispos Sustain Energy 5: 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42768-023-00134-6 doi: 10.1007/s42768-023-00134-6
![]() |
[3] |
Md. Kibria G, Masuk NI, Safayet R, et al (2023) Plastic Waste: Challenges and Opportunities to Mitigate Pollution and Effective Management. Int J Environ Res 17: 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-023-00507-z doi: 10.1007/s41742-023-00507-z
![]() |
[4] |
Azizah P, Ridlo A, Suryono CA (2020) Mikroplastik pada Sedimen di Pantai Kartini Kabupaten Jepara Jawa Tengah. J Mar Res 9: 326–332. https://doi.org/10.14710/jmr.v9i3.28197 doi: 10.14710/jmr.v9i3.28197
![]() |
[5] |
Kumar V, Singh E, Singh S, et al (2023) Micro- and nano-plastics (MNPs) as emerging pollutant in ground water: Environmental impact, potential risks, limitations and way forward towards sustainable management. Chem Eng J 459: 141568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.141568 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.141568
![]() |
[6] |
Campanale C, Massarelli C, Savino I, Locaputo V, Uricchio VF (2020) A Detailed Review Study on Potential Effects of Microplastics and Additives of Concern on Human Health. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17: 1212. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041212 doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041212
![]() |
[7] |
Bostan N, Ilyas N, Akhtar N, et al. (2023) Toxicity assessment of microplastic (MPs); a threat to the ecosystem. Environ Res 234: 116523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.116523 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116523
![]() |
[8] |
Samandra S, Johnston J M, Jaeger J E, et al. (2022) Microplastic contamination of an unconfined groundwater aquifer in Victoria, Australia. Sci Total Environ 802: 149727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149727 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149727
![]() |
[9] |
Viaroli S, Lancia M, Re V (2022) Microplastics contamination of groundwater: Current evidence and future perspectives. Sci Total Environ 824: 153851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153851 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153851
![]() |
[10] |
Ren Z, Gui X, Xu X, et al (2021) Microplastics in the soil-groundwater environment: Aging, migration, and co-transport of contaminants – A critical review. J Hazard Mater 419: 126455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126455 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126455
![]() |
[11] |
Negrete Velasco A, Ramseier Gentile S, Zimmermann S, et al (2023) Contamination and removal efficiency of microplastics and synthetic fibres in a conventional drinking water treatment plant in Geneva, Switzerland. Sci Total Environ 880: 163270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163270 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163270
![]() |
[12] |
Li X, Chen L, Mei Q, et al. (2018) Microplastics in sewage sludge from the wastewater treatment plants in China. Water Res 142: 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.05.034 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.05.034
![]() |
[13] |
Fuller S, Gautam A (2016) A Procedure for Measuring Microplastics using Pressurized Fluid Extraction. Environ Sci Technol 50: 5774–5780. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00816 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b00816
![]() |
[14] |
Shah A, Arjunan A, Baroutaji A, et al (2023) A review of physicochemical and biological contaminants in drinking water and their impacts on human health. Water Sci Eng 16: 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2023.04.003 doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2023.04.003
![]() |
[15] |
Ondara K, Dhiauddin R (2020) Indonesia Marine Debris: Banda Aceh Coastal Environment Identification. J Kel Trop 23: 117. https://doi.org/10.14710/jkt.v23i1.6238 doi: 10.14710/jkt.v23i1.6238
![]() |
[16] |
Windari W, Saiful S, Gani A, et al (2022) Analysis of marine debris at Alue Naga and Ulee Lheue beaches in Banda Aceh City using the transect method. Mater Today Proc 63: S339–S345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.236 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.236
![]() |
[17] |
Liu Q, Chen Y, Chen Z, et al (2022) Current status of microplastics and nanoplastics removal methods: Summary, comparison and prospect. Sci Total Environ 851: 157991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157991 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157991
![]() |
[18] |
Lu Y, Li M-C, Lee J, et al (2023) Microplastic remediation technologies in water and wastewater treatment processes: Current status and future perspectives. Sci Total Environ 868: 161618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161618 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161618
![]() |
[19] |
Nabi I, Bacha A-U-R, Zhang L (2022) A review on microplastics separation techniques from environmental media. J Clean Prod 337: 130458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130458 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130458
![]() |
[20] |
Mat Nawi N I, Bilad M R, Anath G, et al. (2020) The Water Flux Dynamic in a Hybrid Forward Osmosis-Membrane Distillation for Produced Water Treatment. Membranes 10: 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10090225 doi: 10.3390/membranes10090225
![]() |
[21] |
An Y C, Gao X X, Jiang W L, et al. (2023) A critical review on graphene oxide membrane for industrial wastewater treatment. Environ Res 223: 115409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.115409 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115409
![]() |
[22] |
Acarer S (2023) A review of microplastic removal from water and wastewater by membrane technologies. Water Sci Technol 88: 199–219. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2023.186 doi: 10.2166/wst.2023.186
![]() |
[23] |
Pizzichetti ARP, Pablos C, Álvarez-Fernández C, et al (2021) Evaluation of membranes performance for microplastic removal in a simple and low-cost filtration system. Case Stud Chem Environ Eng 3: 100075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2020.100075 doi: 10.1016/j.cscee.2020.100075
![]() |
[24] |
Mulyati S, Rosnelly CM, Syamsuddin Y, et al (2023) Household bleach products as high-performance and cost-effective cleaning agents for membrane fouling. S Afr J Chem Eng 46: 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajce.2023.07.005 doi: 10.1016/j.sajce.2023.07.005
![]() |
[25] |
Barambu N U, Bilad M R, Huda N, et al. (2021) Effect of Membrane Materials and Operational Parameters on Performance and Energy Consumption of Oil/Water Emulsion Filtration. Membranes 11: 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11050370 doi: 10.3390/membranes11050370
![]() |
[26] |
Radityaningrum AD, Trihadiningrum Y, Mar'atusholihah, et al (2021) Microplastic contamination in water supply and the removal efficiencies of the treatment plants: A case of Surabaya City, Indonesia. J Water Process Eng 43: 102195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102195 doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102195
![]() |
[27] |
Hosseini R, Sayadi MH, Aazami J, et al (2020) Accumulation and distribution of microplastics in the sediment and coastal water samples of Chabahar Bay in the Oman Sea, Iran. Mar Pollut Bull 160: 111682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111682 doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111682
![]() |
[28] |
Ta AT, Promchan N (2024) Microplastics in wastewater from developing countries: A comprehensive review and methodology suggestions. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 171: 117537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2024.117537 doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2024.117537
![]() |
[29] |
Yang L, Kang S, Luo X, et al (2024) Microplastics in drinking water: A review on methods, occurrence, sources, and potential risks assessment. Environ Pollut 348: 123857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123857 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123857
![]() |
[30] |
Hänninen J, Weckström M, Pawłowska J, et al. (2021) Plastic debris composition and concentration in the Arctic Ocean, the North Sea and the Baltic Sea. Mar Pollut Bull 165: 112150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112150 doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112150
![]() |
[31] |
Arahman N, Jakfar J, Dzulhijjah W A, et al. (2022) Hydrophilic Antimicrobial Polyethersulfone Membrane for Removal of Turbidity of Well-Water. Water 14: 3769. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14223769 doi: 10.3390/w14223769
![]() |
[32] |
Arahman N, Rosnelly C M, Windana D S, et al. (2021) Antimicrobial Hydrophilic Membrane Formed by Incorporation of Polymeric Surfactant and Patchouli Oil. Polymers 13: 3872. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13223872 doi: 10.3390/polym13223872
![]() |
[33] |
Harmes A, Ambarita AC, Arahman N, et al (2024) Improvement of polyvinylidene fluoride membrane performance by combination of polyethylene glycol and dragon blood resin through coordination reaction with Fe3+ ions. S Afr J Chem Eng 48: 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajce.2024.02.008 doi: 10.1016/j.sajce.2024.02.008
![]() |
[34] |
Mulyati S, Riza M, Muchtar S, et al. (2024) A high performance of polyvinylidene fluoride membrane modified with vanilin for humic acid removal. Case Stud Chem Environ Eng 9: 100654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2024.100654 doi: 10.1016/j.cscee.2024.100654
![]() |
[35] |
Danopoulos E, Twiddy M, Rotchell JM (2020) Microplastic contamination of drinking water: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 15: e0236838. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236838 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236838
![]() |
[36] |
Lusher AL, Bråte ILN, Munno K, Hurley RR, Welden NA (2020) Is It or Isn't It: The Importance of Visual Classification in Microplastic Characterization. Appl Spectrosc 74: 1139–1153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003702820930733 doi: 10.1177/0003702820930733
![]() |
[37] |
Golgoli M, Khiadani M, Shafieian A, et al. (2021) Microplastics fouling and interaction with polymeric membranes: A review. Chemosphere 283: 131185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131185 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131185
![]() |
[38] |
Hasibuan NH, Suryati I, Leonardo R, et al (2020) Analisa jenis, bentuk, dan kelimpahan mikroplastik di Sungai Sei Sikambing Medan. STSP 20: 108. https://doi.org/10.36275/stsp.v20i2.270 doi: 10.36275/stsp.v20i2.270
![]() |
[39] |
Kovač Viršek M, Palatinus A, Koren Š, et al (2016) Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis. JoVE: 55161. https://doi.org/10.3791/55161-v doi: 10.3791/55161-v
![]() |
[40] |
Li J, Wang B, Chen Z, et al (2021) Ultrafiltration membrane fouling by microplastics with raw water: Behaviors and alleviation methods. Chem Eng J 410: 128174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.128174 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.128174
![]() |
[41] |
Cai H, Chen M, Chen Q, et al (2020) Microplastic quantification affected by structure and pore size of filters. Chemosphere 257: 127198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127198 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127198
![]() |
[42] |
Im S-J, Lee H, Jang A (2021) Effects of co-existence of organic matter and microplastics on the rejection of PFCs by forward osmosis membrane. Environ Res 194: 110597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110597 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110597
![]() |
[43] |
Arahman N (2018) Fabrication of Polyethersulfone Membranes Using Nanocarbon as Additive. Int J Geomate 15: 95424. https://doi.org/10.21660/2018.50.95424 doi: 10.21660/2018.50.95424
![]() |
[44] |
Mulyati S, Ambarita A C, Arahman N, et al. (2024) Chemical Stability and Additive Leach Out in Polyethersulfone Membranes Blended with Dragon Blood Resin: An Investigative Study. Korean J Chem Eng 41: 1217–1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-024-00091-8 doi: 10.1007/s11814-024-00091-8
![]() |
Sample code | District | Latitude | Longitude |
1 | Meuraxa | 5°33'51.02"U | 95°18'7.66"T |
2 | Kuta Alam | 5°33'47.61"U | 95°19'43.49"T |
3 | Kuta Raja | 5°34'39.11"U | 95°19'11.67"T |
4 | Syiah Kuala | 5°35'48.53"U | 95°20'46.53"T |
Membrane code | Material (wt%) | Characteristic | |||||
PES | P-188 | PO | NMP | Porosity (%) | Water contact angle (°) | Water flux (L/m2.h) | |
MPO0 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 84 | 53.8 | 70.4 | 25.3 |
MPO1 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 80 | 64.5 | 52.7 | 83.2 |
MPO3 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 78 | 69.9 | 46.0 | 90.7 |
MPO7 | 16 | 3 | 7 | 74 | 73.2 | 39.7 | 151.9 |
No | Sampling point | Particle/mL | Average size (µm) |
1 | Syiah Kuala | 70 | 0.94–536 |
2 | Kuta Alam | 23 | 1.02–804 |
3 | Kuta Raja | 22 | 1.74–414 |
4 | Meuraxa | 15 | 2.77–1223 |
No. | Sampling point | MPs | Shape |
1. | Syiah Kuala | ![]() |
Fragment |
![]() |
Fiber | ||
![]() |
Colorful fiber | ||
![]() |
Transparent fiber | ||
![]() |
Film | ||
![]() |
Granule | ||
2. | Kuta Alam | ![]() |
Fragment |
![]() |
Fiber and granule | ||
![]() |
Colorful fiber | ||
![]() |
Fiber | ||
3. | Kuta Raja | ![]() |
Fragment |
![]() |
Fiber | ||
![]() |
Transparent and colorful fiber | ||
![]() |
Film | ||
4. | Meuraxa | ![]() |
Fragment |
![]() |
Film | ||
![]() |
Fiber | ||
![]() |
Colorful fiber | ||
![]() |
Transparent fiber |
No. | Sample | Wavenumber | Bonding | Plastic types |
1. | Syiah Kuala | 2958.8 | C-H | PP |
2920.2 | N-H | PE | ||
2846.9 | C-H | PE | ||
1635.6 | C-H | PS | ||
1377.2 | C-H | PP | ||
719.4 | CH2 | LDPE | ||
2. | Kuta Alam | 3252.0 | O-H | LDPE |
2966.5 | C-H | PE | ||
1635.6 | C-H | PS | ||
1462.0 | C-H | PP | ||
1396.5 | O-H | LDPE | ||
1377.2 | C-H | PP | ||
719.4 | CH2 | LDPE | ||
3. | Kuta Raja | 2345.4 | C-H | PE |
2112.0 | C-H | PE | ||
1635.6 | C-H | PS | ||
1462.0 | C-H | PP | ||
1396.5 | O-H | LDPE | ||
1377.2 | C-H | PP | ||
1342.5 | C-O | PEG | ||
719.4 | C-H | LDPE | ||
4. | Meuraxa | 1635.6 | H-C-H | PEG |
1462.0 | C-H | PP | ||
1396.5 | O-H | LDPE | ||
1377.2 | C-H | PP | ||
717.5 | Benzene derivative | PS |
No. | Sample | Membrane | Size (µm) | Remark | Rejection (%) | ||
x | y | z | |||||
1 | Syiah Kuala | MPO0 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 |
MPO1 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO3 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO7 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
2 | Kuta Alam | MPO0 | 143 | 86 | 129 | Exist | 82 |
118 | 85 | 103 | Exist | ||||
MPO1 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO3 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO7 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
3 | Kuta Raja | MPO0 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 |
MPO1 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO3 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO7 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
4 | Meuraxa | MPO0 | 195 | 33 | Exist | 87.5 | |
MPO1 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO3 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO7 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 |
No. | Sample | Shape | |
1. | Kuta Alam 2: A Day of Learning | ![]() |
Fragment |
2. | Meuraxa 1 | ![]() |
Colorful fiber |
Sample code | District | Latitude | Longitude |
1 | Meuraxa | 5°33'51.02"U | 95°18'7.66"T |
2 | Kuta Alam | 5°33'47.61"U | 95°19'43.49"T |
3 | Kuta Raja | 5°34'39.11"U | 95°19'11.67"T |
4 | Syiah Kuala | 5°35'48.53"U | 95°20'46.53"T |
Membrane code | Material (wt%) | Characteristic | |||||
PES | P-188 | PO | NMP | Porosity (%) | Water contact angle (°) | Water flux (L/m2.h) | |
MPO0 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 84 | 53.8 | 70.4 | 25.3 |
MPO1 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 80 | 64.5 | 52.7 | 83.2 |
MPO3 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 78 | 69.9 | 46.0 | 90.7 |
MPO7 | 16 | 3 | 7 | 74 | 73.2 | 39.7 | 151.9 |
No | Sampling point | Particle/mL | Average size (µm) |
1 | Syiah Kuala | 70 | 0.94–536 |
2 | Kuta Alam | 23 | 1.02–804 |
3 | Kuta Raja | 22 | 1.74–414 |
4 | Meuraxa | 15 | 2.77–1223 |
No. | Sampling point | MPs | Shape |
1. | Syiah Kuala | ![]() |
Fragment |
![]() |
Fiber | ||
![]() |
Colorful fiber | ||
![]() |
Transparent fiber | ||
![]() |
Film | ||
![]() |
Granule | ||
2. | Kuta Alam | ![]() |
Fragment |
![]() |
Fiber and granule | ||
![]() |
Colorful fiber | ||
![]() |
Fiber | ||
3. | Kuta Raja | ![]() |
Fragment |
![]() |
Fiber | ||
![]() |
Transparent and colorful fiber | ||
![]() |
Film | ||
4. | Meuraxa | ![]() |
Fragment |
![]() |
Film | ||
![]() |
Fiber | ||
![]() |
Colorful fiber | ||
![]() |
Transparent fiber |
No. | Sample | Wavenumber | Bonding | Plastic types |
1. | Syiah Kuala | 2958.8 | C-H | PP |
2920.2 | N-H | PE | ||
2846.9 | C-H | PE | ||
1635.6 | C-H | PS | ||
1377.2 | C-H | PP | ||
719.4 | CH2 | LDPE | ||
2. | Kuta Alam | 3252.0 | O-H | LDPE |
2966.5 | C-H | PE | ||
1635.6 | C-H | PS | ||
1462.0 | C-H | PP | ||
1396.5 | O-H | LDPE | ||
1377.2 | C-H | PP | ||
719.4 | CH2 | LDPE | ||
3. | Kuta Raja | 2345.4 | C-H | PE |
2112.0 | C-H | PE | ||
1635.6 | C-H | PS | ||
1462.0 | C-H | PP | ||
1396.5 | O-H | LDPE | ||
1377.2 | C-H | PP | ||
1342.5 | C-O | PEG | ||
719.4 | C-H | LDPE | ||
4. | Meuraxa | 1635.6 | H-C-H | PEG |
1462.0 | C-H | PP | ||
1396.5 | O-H | LDPE | ||
1377.2 | C-H | PP | ||
717.5 | Benzene derivative | PS |
No. | Sample | Membrane | Size (µm) | Remark | Rejection (%) | ||
x | y | z | |||||
1 | Syiah Kuala | MPO0 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 |
MPO1 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO3 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO7 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
2 | Kuta Alam | MPO0 | 143 | 86 | 129 | Exist | 82 |
118 | 85 | 103 | Exist | ||||
MPO1 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO3 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO7 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
3 | Kuta Raja | MPO0 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 |
MPO1 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO3 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO7 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
4 | Meuraxa | MPO0 | 195 | 33 | Exist | 87.5 | |
MPO1 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO3 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 | ||
MPO7 | - | - | - | Not found | 100 |
No. | Sample | Shape | |
1. | Kuta Alam 2: A Day of Learning | ![]() |
Fragment |
2. | Meuraxa 1 | ![]() |
Colorful fiber |