Research article Special Issues

The dynamic nexus between economic factors, socioeconomic factors, green growth factors, and ecological footprint: evidence from GCC economies

  • Received: 26 May 2024 Revised: 15 August 2024 Accepted: 03 September 2024 Published: 19 September 2024
  • Industrialization, financial activities, and intensive human activities have reduced continuous habitats to smaller patches, threatening the safety of the ecosystem. However, as technological innovation and digitization increase, this negative impact will be somewhat neutralized. To address this issue, the current study examined the role of economic, socioeconomic, and green indicators on the ecological footprint in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). By using data from 1990–2019, we have applied multiple panel tests to determine the long-run and short-run relationships among the variables. The findings show that economic growth increases the long-term ecological footprint in the GCC. The human development index and financial inclusion coefficients are also positively and significantly linked with the ecological footprint. The socioeconomic index, however, reveals a negative relationship between ecological footprint and GCC. Similarly, digitalization and environmental technologies have a negative and major impact on the ecological footprint. It indicates that green growth factors contribute to long-term improvements in environmental quality. So, GCC nations should emphasize investing in green growth factors and enact strict environmental regulations to safeguard their country from environmental problems.

    Citation: Majid Ibrahim Alsaggaf. The dynamic nexus between economic factors, socioeconomic factors, green growth factors, and ecological footprint: evidence from GCC economies[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2024, 11(5): 797-830. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2024040

    Related Papers:

  • Industrialization, financial activities, and intensive human activities have reduced continuous habitats to smaller patches, threatening the safety of the ecosystem. However, as technological innovation and digitization increase, this negative impact will be somewhat neutralized. To address this issue, the current study examined the role of economic, socioeconomic, and green indicators on the ecological footprint in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). By using data from 1990–2019, we have applied multiple panel tests to determine the long-run and short-run relationships among the variables. The findings show that economic growth increases the long-term ecological footprint in the GCC. The human development index and financial inclusion coefficients are also positively and significantly linked with the ecological footprint. The socioeconomic index, however, reveals a negative relationship between ecological footprint and GCC. Similarly, digitalization and environmental technologies have a negative and major impact on the ecological footprint. It indicates that green growth factors contribute to long-term improvements in environmental quality. So, GCC nations should emphasize investing in green growth factors and enact strict environmental regulations to safeguard their country from environmental problems.



    加载中


    [1] Jiakui C, Abbas J, Najam H, et al. (2023) Green technological innovation, green finance, and financial development and their role in green total factor productivity: Empirical insights from China. J Clean Prod 382: 135131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135131 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135131
    [2] Yang B, Jahanger A, Usman M, et al. (2021) The dynamic linkage between globalization, financial development, energy utilization, and environmental sustainability in GCC countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28: 16568–16588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11576-4 doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11576-4
    [3] Sharif A, Meo MS, Chowdhury MAF, et al. (2021) Role of solar energy in reducing ecological footprints: An empirical analysis. J Clean Prod 292: 126028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126028 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126028
    [4] Haider S, Akram V (2019) Club convergence of per capita carbon emission: global insight from disaggregated level data. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26: 11074–11086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04573-9 doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04573-9
    [5] Hussain MM, Pal S, Villanthenkodath MA (2023) Towards sustainable development: The impact of transport infrastructure expenditure on the ecological footprint in India. Innov Green Dev 2: 100037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100037 doi: 10.1016/j.igd.2023.100037
    [6] Elimelech M, Phillip WA (2011) The future of seawater desalination: Energy, technology, and the environment. Science 333: 712–717. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200488 doi: 10.1126/science.1200488
    [7] Al-Mulali U, Saboori B, Ozturk I (2015) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Vietnam. Energy Policy 76: 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.019 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.019
    [8] Ansari MA, Ahmad MR, Siddique S, et al. (2020) An environment Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: Evidence from GCC countries. Carbon Manag 11: 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2020.1790242 doi: 10.1080/17583004.2020.1790242
    [9] Charabi Y (2023) Deep near-term mitigation of short-lived climate forcers in Oman: grand challenges and prospects. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30: 3918–3928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22488-w doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22488-w
    [10] Al Khars M, Miah F, Qudrat-Ullah H, et al. (2020) A Systematic Review of the Relationship Between Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in GCC Countries. Sustain 12: 3845. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093845 doi: 10.3390/su12093845
    [11] Al-shammari ASA, Muneer S, Tripathi A (2022) Do Information Communication Technology and Economic Development Impact Environmental Degradation? Evidence From the GCC Countries. Front Environ Sci 10: 628. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.875932 doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.875932
    [12] Wackernagel M, Rees W (1998) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth, New society publishers.
    [13] Hassan ST, Xia E, Khan NH, et al. (2019) Economic growth, natural resources, and ecological footprints: evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26: 2929–2938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3803-3 doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3803-3
    [14] Ullah A, Ahmed M, Raza SA, et al. (2021) A threshold approach to sustainable development: Nonlinear relationship between renewable energy consumption, natural resource rent, and ecological footprint. J Environ Manage 295: 113073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113073 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113073
    [15] Xue L, Haseeb M, Mahmood H, et al. (2021) Renewable Energy Use and Ecological Footprints Mitigation: Evidence from Selected South Asian Economies. Sustain 13: 1613. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041613 doi: 10.3390/su13041613
    [16] Chen Y, Cheng L, Lee CC (2022) How does the use of industrial robots affect the ecological footprint? International evidence. Ecol Econ 198: 107483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107483 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107483
    [17] Solarin SA (2019) Convergence in CO 2 emissions, carbon footprint and ecological footprint: evidence from OECD countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26: 6167–6181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3993-8 doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3993-8
    [18] Ozcan B, Ulucak R, Dogan E (2019) Analyzing long lasting effects of environmental policies: Evidence from low, middle and high income economies. Sustain Cities Soc 44: 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.09.025 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.09.025
    [19] Bilgili F, Ulucak R (2018) Is there deterministic, stochastic, and/or club convergence in ecological footprint indicator among G20 countries? Environ Sci Pollut Res 25: 35404–35419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3457-1 doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3457-1
    [20] Lin W, Li Y, Li X, et al. (2018) The dynamic analysis and evaluation on tourist ecological footprint of city: Take Shanghai as an instance. Sustain Cities Soc 37: 541–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.003 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.003
    [21] Bliss-Guest P, Rodriguez A (1982) The Caribbean Action Plan: a framework for sustainable development. Ekistics A Rev Probl Sci Hum settlements Athenai 49: 182–183.
    [22] Caldwell LK (1984) Political Aspsects of Ecologically Sustainable Development. Environ Conserv 11: 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1017/S037689290001465X doi: 10.1017/S037689290001465X
    [23] Holden E, Linnerud K, Banister D (2017) The Imperatives of Sustainable Development. Sustain Dev 25: 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1647 doi: 10.1002/sd.1647
    [24] de Jong E, Vijge MJ (2021) From Millennium to Sustainable Development Goals: Evolving discourses and their reflection in policy coherence for development. Earth Syst Gov 7: 100087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100087 doi: 10.1016/j.esg.2020.100087
    [25] Todaro MP (1977) Economic Development in the Third World: An introduction to problems and policies in a global perspective, Pearson Education.
    [26] Brinkman RL, Brinkman JE (2014) GDP as a Measure of Progress and Human Development: A Process of Conceptual Evolution. 45: 447–456. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624450222
    [27] Costantini V, Monni S (2008) Environment, human development and economic growth. Ecol Econ 64: 867–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.011 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.011
    [28] Chai J, Zhang X, Lu Q, et al. (2021) Research on imbalance between supply and demand in China's natural gas market under the double-track price system. Energy Policy 155: 112380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112380 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112380
    [29] Costanza R, Kubiszewski I, Giovannini E, et al. (2014) Development: Time to leave GDP behind. Nat 505: 283–285. https://doi.org/10.1038/505283a doi: 10.1038/505283a
    [30] do Carvalhal Monteiro RL, Pereira V, Costa HG (2018) A Multicriteria Approach to the Human Development Index Classification. Soc Indic Res 136: 417–438. ttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1556-x
    [31] Chiappero-Martinetti E, von Jacobi N, Signorelli M (2015) Human Development and Economic Growth. Palgrave Dict Emerg Mark Transit Econ 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-37138-6_13 doi: 10.1007/978-1-137-37138-6_13
    [32] Jahanger A, Usman M, Murshed M, et al. (2022) The linkages between natural resources, human capital, globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: The moderating role of technological innovations. Resour Policy 76: 102569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102569 doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102569
    [33] Usman M, Makhdum MSA, Kousar R (2021) Does financial inclusion, renewable and non-renewable energy utilization accelerate ecological footprints and economic growth? Fresh evidence from 15 highest emitting countries. Sustain Cities Soc 65: 102590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102590 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102590
    [34] Le TH, Le HC, Taghizadeh-Hesary F (2020) Does financial inclusion impact CO2 emissions? Evidence from Asia. Financ Res Lett 34: 101451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101451 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101451
    [35] Abbasi F, Riaz K (2016) CO2 emissions and financial development in an emerging economy: An augmented VAR approach. Energy Policy 90: 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.017 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.017
    [36] Acheampong AO (2019) Modelling for insight: Does financial development improve environmental quality? Energy Econ 83: 156–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.06.025 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.06.025
    [37] Ouedraogo NS (2013) Energy consumption and human development: Evidence from a panel cointegration and error correction model. Energy 63: 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.09.067 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.09.067
    [38] UNDP (2022) Human Development Index Report 2021-22, New York.
    [39] UNDP (2022) Sustainable Development Goals | United Nations Development Programme 2022.
    [40] Kassouri Y, Altıntaş H (2020) Human well-being versus ecological footprint in MENA countries: A trade-off? J Environ Manage 263: 110405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110405 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110405
    [41] Jie H, Khan I, Alharthi M, et al. (2023) Sustainable energy policy, socio-economic development, and ecological footprint: The economic significance of natural resources, population growth, and industrial development. Util Policy 81: 101490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101490 doi: 10.1016/j.jup.2023.101490
    [42] Bilal, Khan I, Tan D, et al. (2022) Alternate energy sources and environmental quality: The impact of inflation dynamics. Gondwana Res 106: 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2021.12.011 doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2021.12.011
    [43] Wang Z, Yang L, Yin J, et al. (2018) Assessment and prediction of environmental sustainability in China based on a modified ecological footprint model. Resour Conserv Recycl 132: 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.05.003 doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.05.003
    [44] Huo W, Zaman BU, Zulfiqar M, et al. (2023) How do environmental technologies affect environmental degradation? Analyzing the direct and indirect impact of financial innovations and economic globalization. Environ Technol Innov 29: 102973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102973 doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2022.102973
    [45] Kahouli B, Chaaben N (2022) Investigate the link among energy Consumption, environmental Pollution, Foreign Trade, Foreign direct Investment, and economic Growth: Empirical evidence from GCC countries. Energy Build 266: 112117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112117 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112117
    [46] Wang H, Cui H, Zhao Q (2021) Effect of green technology innovation on green total factor productivity in China: Evidence from spatial durbin model analysis. J Clean Prod 288: 125624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125624 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125624
    [47] Ren S, Hao Y, Wu H (2022) Digitalization and environment governance: does internet development reduce environmental pollution? https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2022.2033959
    [48] Papworth S, Rao M, Oo MM, et al. (2017) The impact of gold mining and agricultural concessions on the tree cover and local communities in northern Myanmar OPEN. Nat Publ Gr. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46594
    [49] Lailag U, Chen W (2022) How Does Digitization Affect Sports Industry Development and Public Health? Econ Anal Lett 1: 8–14. https://doi.org/10.58567/eal01010002 doi: 10.58567/eal01010002
    [50] Feng S, Chong Y, Yu H, et al. (2022) Digital financial development and ecological footprint: Evidence from green-biased technology innovation and environmental inclusion. J Clean Prod 380: 135069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135069 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135069
    [51] Awan U, Shamim S, Khan Z, et al. (2021) Big data analytics capability and decision-making: The role of data-driven insight on circular economy performance. Technol Forecast Soc Change 168: 120766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120766 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120766
    [52] Awan U, Sroufe R, Shahbaz M (2021) Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: A literature review and recommendations for future research. Bus Strateg Environ 30: 2038–2060. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2731 doi: 10.1002/bse.2731
    [53] Feng S, Zhang R, Li G (2022) Environmental decentralization, digital finance and green technology innovation. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 61: 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.02.008 doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2022.02.008
    [54] Zhou Y, Li Y, Liu Y (2020) The nexus between regional eco-environmental degradation and rural impoverishment in China. Habitat Int 96: 102086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102086 doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102086
    [55] Li W, Qiao Y, Li X, et al. (2022) Energy consumption, pollution haven hypothesis, and Environmental Kuznets Curve: Examining the environment–economy link in belt and road initiative countries. Energy 239: 122559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122559 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122559
    [56] Harry B, Rafiq S, Salim R (2015) Economic growth with coal, oil and renewable energy consumption in China: Prospects for fuel substitution. Econ Model 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.09.017 doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2014.09.017
    [57] Liang W, Yang M (2019) Urbanization, economic growth and environmental pollution: Evidence from China. Sustain Comput Informatics Syst 21: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2018.11.007 doi: 10.1016/j.suscom.2018.11.007
    [58] Saqib N, Duran IA, Hashmi N (2022) Impact of Financial Deepening, Energy Consumption and Total Natural Resource Rent on CO2 Emission in the GCC Countries: Evidence from Advanced Panel Data Simulation. Int J Energy Econ Policy 12: 400–409. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.12907 doi: 10.32479/ijeep.12907
    [59] Tamazian A, Chousa JP, Vadlamannati KC (2009) Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: Evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy 37: 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.025 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.025
    [60] Islam F, Shahbaz M, Ahmed AU, et al. (2013) Financial development and energy consumption nexus in Malaysia: A multivariate time series analysis. Econ Model 30: 435–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.09.033 doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2012.09.033
    [61] Shahbaz M, Hye QMA, Tiwari AK, et al. (2013) Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 25: 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.009 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.009
    [62] Destek MA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: The role of energy and financial development. Sci Total Environ 650: 2483–2489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.017 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.017
    [63] Naqvi B, Rizvi SKA, Mirza N, et al. (2023) Financial market development: A potentiating policy choice for the green transition in G7 economies. Int Rev Financ Anal 87: 102577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102577 doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102577
    [64] Nyiwul L (2018) Income, environmental considerations, and sustainable energy consumption in Africa. 15: 264–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2018.1439037
    [65] Hu Y, Jiang W, Dong H, et al. (2022) Transmission channels between financial efficiency and renewable energy consumption: Does environmental technology matter in high-polluting economies? J Clean Prod 368: 132885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132885 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132885
    [66] Smith HE, Ryan CM, Vollmer F, et al. (2019) Impacts of land use intensification on human wellbeing: Evidence from rural Mozambique. Glob Environ Chang 59: 101976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101976 doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101976
    [67] Pinto LV, Inácio M, Ferreira CSS, et al. (2022) Ecosystem services and well-being dimensions related to urban green spaces – A systematic review. Sustain Cities Soc 85: 104072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104072 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104072
    [68] Panayotou T (1993) Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development.
    [69] Kaye AD, Okeagu CN, Pham AD, et al. (2021) Economic impact of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare facilities and systems: International perspectives. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 35: 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2020.11.009 doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.11.009
    [70] Bel G, Rosell J (2017) The impact of socioeconomic characteristics on CO2 emissions associated with urban mobility: Inequality across individuals. Energy Econ 64: 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.04.002 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.04.002
    [71] Awodumi OB, Adewuyi AO (2020) The role of non-renewable energy consumption in economic growth and carbon emission: Evidence from oil producing economies in Africa. Energy Strateg Rev 27: 100434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100434 doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2019.100434
    [72] Kong YS, Khan R (2019) To examine environmental pollution by economic growth and their impact in an environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) among developed and developing countries. PLoS One 14: e0209532. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209532 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209532
    [73] Ahmed Z, Ahmad M, Rjoub H, et al. (2022) Economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and ecological footprint: Exploring the role of environmental regulations and democracy in sustainable development. Sustain Dev 30: 595–605. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2251 doi: 10.1002/sd.2251
    [74] Ouyang X, Li Q, Du K (2020) How does environmental regulation promote technological innovations in the industrial sector? Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data. Energy Policy 139: 111310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111310 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111310
    [75] Hussain M, Dogan E (2021) The role of institutional quality and environment-related technologies in environmental degradation for BRICS. J Clean Prod 304: 127059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127059 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127059
    [76] Li W, Ullah S (2022) Research and development intensity and its influence on renewable energy consumption: evidence from selected Asian economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29: 54448–54455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19650-9 doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19650-9
    [77] Kwakwa PA, Adusah-Poku F, Adjei-Mantey K (2021) Towards the attainment of sustainable development goal 7: what determines clean energy accessibility in sub-Saharan Africa? Green Financ 3: 268–287. https://doi.org/10.3934/GF.2021014 doi: 10.3934/GF.2021014
    [78] Lange S, Pohl J, Santarius T (2020) Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand? Ecol Econ 176: 106760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106760 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106760
    [79] Paschou T, Rapaccini M, Adrodegari F, et al. (2020) Digital servitization in manufacturing: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Ind Mark Manag 89: 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.012 doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.012
    [80] Wang J, Zhu J, Luo X (2021) Research on the measurement of China's digital economy development and the characteristics. J Quant Tech Econ 38: 26–42.
    [81] Yang J, Li X, Huang S (2020) Impacts on environmental quality and required environmental regulation adjustments: A perspective of directed technical change driven by big data. J Clean Prod 275: 124126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124126 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124126
    [82] Yao Y, Hu D, Yang C, et al. (2015) The impact and mechanism of fintech on green total factor productivity. Green Financ 3: 198–221. https://doi.org/10.3934/GF.2021011 doi: 10.3934/GF.2021011
    [83] Galli A, Wackernagel M, Iha K, et al. (2014) Ecological Footprint: Implications for biodiversity. Biol Conserv 173: 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.10.019 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.10.019
    [84] Tsuchiya K, Iha K, Murthy A, et al. (2021) Decentralization & local food: Japan's regional Ecological Footprints indicate localized sustainability strategies. J Clean Prod 292: 126043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126043 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126043
    [85] Caglar AE, Yavuz E, Mert M, et al. (2022) The ecological footprint facing asymmetric natural resources challenges: evidence from the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29: 10521–10534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16406-9 doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16406-9
    [86] Usman M, Yaseen MR, Kousar R, et al. (2021) Modeling financial development, tourism, energy consumption, and environmental quality: Is there any discrepancy between developing and developed countries? Environ Sci Pollut Res 28: 58480–58501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14837-y doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14837-y
    [87] Kahouli B (2017) The short and long run causality relationship among economic growth, energy consumption and financial development: Evidence from South Mediterranean Countries (SMCs). Energy Econ 68: 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.09.013 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.09.013
    [88] Baloch MA, Zhang J, Iqbal K, et al. (2019) The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26: 6199–6208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3992-9 doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3992-9
    [89] Pesaran MH, Smith R (1995) Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Econom 68: 79–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01644-F doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01644-F
    [90] Pesaran MH, Pesaran MH, Shin Y, et al. (1999) Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels. J Am Stat Assoc 94: 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10474156 doi: 10.1080/01621459.1999.10474156
    [91] Osman M, Gachino G, Hoque A (2016) Electricity consumption and economic growth in the GCC countries: Panel data analysis. Energy Policy 98: 318–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.050 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.050
    [92] Benhabib J, Bond S, Cummings J, et al. (2004) Financial development, financial fragility, and growth. JSTORNV Loayza, R RanciereJournal money, Credit banking, 2006•JSTOR.
    [93] Samargandi N, Fidrmuc J, Ghosh S (2014) Financial development and economic growth in an oil-rich economy: The case of Saudi Arabia. Econ Model 43: 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.07.042 doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2014.07.042
    [94] Mohanty S, Sethi N (2022) The energy consumption-environmental quality nexus in BRICS countries: the role of outward foreign direct investment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29: 19714–19730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17180-4 doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17180-4
    [95] Hashem Pesaran M, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econom 142: 50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
    [96] Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2015) Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. J Econom 188: 393–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007 doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007
    [97] Westerlund J (2008) Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. J Appl Econom 23: 193–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.967 doi: 10.1002/jae.967
    [98] Dogan E, Ulucak R, Kocak E, et al. (2020) The use of ecological footprint in estimating the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis for BRICST by considering cross-section dependence and heterogeneity. Sci Total Environ 723: 138063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138063 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138063
    [99] Huang Y, Haseeb M, Usman M, et al. (2022) Dynamic association between ICT, renewable energy, economic complexity and ecological footprint: Is there any difference between E-7 (developing) and G-7 (developed) countries? Technol Soc 68: 101853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101853 doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101853
    [100] Khalid K, Usman M, Mehdi MA (2021) The determinants of environmental quality in the SAARC region: a spatial heterogeneous panel data approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28: 6422–6436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10896-9 doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10896-9
    [101] Usman M, Kousar R, Yaseen MR, et al. (2020) An empirical nexus between economic growth, energy utilization, trade policy, and ecological footprint: a continent-wise comparison in upper-middle-income countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27: 38995–39018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09772-3 doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09772-3
    [102] Shen Y, Hu W, Hueng CJ (2021) Digital Financial Inclusion and Economic Growth: A Cross-country Study. Procedia Comput Sci 187: 218–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.04.054 doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.04.054
    [103] Amin A, Dogan E, Khan Z (2020) The impacts of different proxies for financialization on carbon emissions in top-ten emitter countries. Sci Total Environ 740: 140127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140127 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140127
    [104] Bhattacharya M, Awaworyi Churchill S, Paramati SR (2017) The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2 emissions across regions. Renew Energy 111: 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.102 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.102
    [105] Ahmed Z, Nathaniel SP, Shahbaz M (2021) The criticality of information and communication technology and human capital in environmental sustainability: Evidence from Latin American and Caribbean countries. J Clean Prod 286: 125529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125529 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125529
    [106] Adewale Alola A, Ozturk I, Bekun FV (2021) Is clean energy prosperity and technological innovation rapidly mitigating sustainable energy-development deficit in selected sub-Saharan Africa? A myth or reality. Energy Policy 158: 112520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112520 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112520
    [107] Kihombo S, Ahmed Z, Chen S, et al. (2021) Linking financial development, economic growth, and ecological footprint: what is the role of technological innovation? Environ Sci Pollut Res 28: 61235–61245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14993-1 doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14993-1
    [108] Acaravci A, Ozturk I, I. O (2010) On the Relationship between Energy Consumption, CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth in Europe. Energy 35: 5412–5420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.07.009 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.07.009
    [109] Yu Y, Ren H, Kharrazi A, et al. (2015) Exploring socioeconomic drivers of environmental pressure on the city level: The case study of Chongqing in China. Ecol Econ 118: 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.019 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.019
    [110] Wu Y, Zhang Y (2022) The Impact of Environmental Technology and Environmental Policy Strictness on China's Green Growth and Analysis of Development Methods. J Environ Public Health 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1052824
    [111] Ulucak R, Danish, Khan SUD (2020) Does information and communication technology affect CO2 mitigation under the pathway of sustainable development during the mode of globalization? Sustain Dev 28: 857–867. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2041 doi: 10.1002/sd.2041
    [112] He K, Ramzan M, Awosusi AA, et al. (2021) Does Globalization Moderate the Effect of Economic Complexity on CO2 Emissions? Evidence From the Top 10 Energy Transition Economies. Front Environ Sci 9: 778088. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.778088 doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2021.778088
    [113] Juodis A, Karavias Y, Sarafidis V (2021) A homogeneous approach to testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Empir Econ 60: 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01970-9 doi: 10.1007/s00181-020-01970-9
    [114] Sinha A, Sengupta T (2019) Impact of natural resource rents on human development: What is the role of globalization in Asia Pacific countries? Resour Policy 63: 101413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101413 doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101413
    [115] Charfeddine L, Kahia M (2019) Impact of renewable energy consumption and financial development on CO2 emissions and economic growth in the MENA region: A panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) analysis. Renew Energy 139: 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.010 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.010
    [116] Douglas I (2017) Ecosystems and human well-being. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809665-9.09206-5
    [117] Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, et al. (2015) Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science (80-) 347. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
    [118] Zhang Q, Yu Z, Kong D (2019) The real effect of legal institutions: Environmental courts and firm environmental protection expenditure. J Environ Econ Manage 98: 102254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2019.102254 doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2019.102254
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(173) PDF downloads(40) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(2)  /  Tables(11)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog