Research article Special Issues

Monitoring river water quality through predictive modeling using artificial neural networks backpropagation

  • Received: 02 July 2024 Revised: 05 August 2024 Accepted: 07 August 2024 Published: 19 August 2024
  • Predicting river water quality in the Special Region of Yogyakarta (DIY) is crucial. In this research, we modeled a river water quality prediction system using the artificial neural network (ANN) backpropagation method. Backpropagation is one of the developments of the multilayer perceptron (MLP) network, which can reduce the level of prediction error by adjusting the weights based on the difference in output and the desired target. Water quality parameters included biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total suspended solids (TSS), dissolved oxygen (DO), total phosphate, fecal coliforms, and total coliforms. The research object was the upstream, downstream, and middle parts of the Oya River. The data source was secondary data from the DIY Environment and Forestry Service. Data were in the form of time series data for 2013–2023. Descriptive data results showed that the water quality of the Oya River in 2020–2023 was better than in previous years. However, increasing community and industrial activities can reduce water quality. This was concluded based on the prediction results of the ANN backpropagation method with a hidden layer number of 4. The prediction results for period 3 in 2023 and period 1 in 2024 are that 1) the concentrations of BOD, fecal coli, and total coli will increase and exceed quality standards, 2) COD and TSS concentrations will increase but will still be below quality standards, 3) DO and total phosphate concentrations will remain constant and still on the threshold of quality standards. The possibility of several water quality parameters increasing above the quality standards remains, so the potential for contamination of the Oya River is still high. Therefore, early prevention of river water pollution is necessary.

    Citation: Muhammad Andang Novianta, Syafrudin, Budi Warsito, Siti Rachmawati. Monitoring river water quality through predictive modeling using artificial neural networks backpropagation[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2024, 11(4): 649-664. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2024032

    Related Papers:

  • Predicting river water quality in the Special Region of Yogyakarta (DIY) is crucial. In this research, we modeled a river water quality prediction system using the artificial neural network (ANN) backpropagation method. Backpropagation is one of the developments of the multilayer perceptron (MLP) network, which can reduce the level of prediction error by adjusting the weights based on the difference in output and the desired target. Water quality parameters included biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total suspended solids (TSS), dissolved oxygen (DO), total phosphate, fecal coliforms, and total coliforms. The research object was the upstream, downstream, and middle parts of the Oya River. The data source was secondary data from the DIY Environment and Forestry Service. Data were in the form of time series data for 2013–2023. Descriptive data results showed that the water quality of the Oya River in 2020–2023 was better than in previous years. However, increasing community and industrial activities can reduce water quality. This was concluded based on the prediction results of the ANN backpropagation method with a hidden layer number of 4. The prediction results for period 3 in 2023 and period 1 in 2024 are that 1) the concentrations of BOD, fecal coli, and total coli will increase and exceed quality standards, 2) COD and TSS concentrations will increase but will still be below quality standards, 3) DO and total phosphate concentrations will remain constant and still on the threshold of quality standards. The possibility of several water quality parameters increasing above the quality standards remains, so the potential for contamination of the Oya River is still high. Therefore, early prevention of river water pollution is necessary.



    加载中


    [1] Utama JP, Syafrudin, Nugraha WD (2015) Penentuan Daya tampung beban pencemaran BOD dan Fecal Coliform Sungai Plumbon Kota Semarang Dengan software QUAL2E. J Teknik Lingkungan 4: 1–9.
    [2] Warsito B, Sumiyati S, Yasin H, et al. (2021) Evaluation of river water quality by using hierarchical clustering analysis, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/896/1/012072 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/896/1/012072
    [3] Zubaidah T, Karnaningroem N, Slamet A (2018) K-means method for clustering water quality status on the rivers of Banjarmasin, Indonesia. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 13. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/s9n2u doi: 10.31227/osf.io/s9n2u
    [4] Novianta MA, Syafrudin S, Warsito B (2023) K-means clustering for Grouping Rivers in DIY based on water quality parameters. JUITA J Inform 11: 155–163. https://doi.org/10.30595/juita.v11i1.16986 doi: 10.30595/juita.v11i1.16986
    [5] Di Z, Chang M, Guo P (2019) Water quality evaluation of the Yangtze River in China using machine learning techniques and data monitoring on different time scales. Water 11: 339. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020339 doi: 10.3390/w11020339
    [6] Mohammadrezapour O, Kisi O, Pourahmad F (2020) Fuzzy c-means and K-means clustering with genetic algorithm for identification of homogeneous regions of groundwater quality. Neural Comput Appl 32: 3763–3775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3768-7 doi: 10.1007/s00521-018-3768-7
    [7] Widyastuti M, Marfai MA (2004) Kajian daya tampung sungai gajahwong thdp beban pencemaran. Majalah Geografi Indonesia. 8: 81–97.
    [8] Riza H, Santoso EW, Tejakusuma IG, et al. (2020) Utilization of artificial intelligence to improve flood disaster mitigation. Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Mitigasi Bencana 30: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.29122/jstmb.v15i1.4145 doi: 10.29122/jstmb.v15i1.4145
    [9] Makubura R, Meddage DPP, Azamathulla HM, et al. (2022) A simplified mathematical formulation for water quality index (WQI): A case study in the Kelani River Basin, Sri Lanka. Fluids 7: 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids7050147 doi: 10.3390/fluids7050147
    [10] Madhushani C, Dananjaya K, Ekanayake IU, et al. (2024) Modeling streamflow in non-gauged watersheds with sparse data considering physiographic, dynamic climate, and anthropogenic factors using explainable soft computing techniques. J Hydrol 631: 130846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130846 doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130846
    [11] Perera UAKK, Coralage DTS, Ekanayake IU, et al. (2024) A new frontier in streamflow modeling in ungauged basins with sparse data: A modified generative adversarial network with explainable AI. Results Eng 21: 101920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101920 doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101920
    [12] Pohan S, Warsito B, Suryono S (2020) Backpropagation artificial neural network for prediction plant seedling growth. J Phys 1524: 012147. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1524/1/012147 doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1524/1/012147
    [13] Purba RA, Samsir S, Siddik M, et al. (2020), The optimization of backpropagation neural networks to simplify decision making, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 830: 022091. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/830/2/022091 doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/830/2/022091
    [14] Nurjaya IK, Estananto E, Murti A (2022) Pemodelan sistem kendali suhu otomatis pada Smart poultry farm menggunakan metode jaringan saraf tiruan. eProc Eng 9.
    [15] Haekal M, Wibowo WC (2023) Prediksi kualitas air sungai menggunakan metode pembelajaran mesin: Studi kasus Sungai Ciliwung: Prediction of river water quality using machine learning methods: Ciliwung River case study. Jurnal Teknologi Lingkungan 24: 273–282. https://doi.org/10.55981/jtl.2023.795 doi: 10.55981/jtl.2023.795
    [16] Mustafa HM, Mustapha A, Hayder G, et al. (2021) Applications of iot and artificial intelligence in water quality monitoring and prediction: A review, In 2021 6th International Conference on inventive computation technologies (ICICT), 968–975. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICT50816.2021.9358675
    [17] DLHK DIY (2021) Dokumen Informasi Kinerja Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Daerah (DIKPLHD) Provinsi DIY Tahun 2021, Yogyakarta.
    [18] Masruroh M (2020) Perbandingan metode regresi linear dan neural network backpropagation dalam prediksi nilai Ujian nasional siswa smp menggunakan software R. Joutica 5: 331–336. https://doi.org/10.30736/jti.v5i1.347 doi: 10.30736/jti.v5i1.347
    [19] Wanto A (2019) Prediksi produktivitas jagung di Indonesia sebagai upaya antisipasi impor menggunakan jaringan saraf tiruan backpropagation, SINTECH 2: 53–62. https://doi.org/10.31598/sintechjournal.v2i1.355 doi: 10.31598/sintechjournal.v2i1.355
    [20] Sudarsono A (2016) Jaringan syaraf tiruan untuk memprediksi laju pertambahan penduduk menggunakan metode backpropagation (studi Kasus di Kota Bengkulu). Jurnal Media Infotama 12. https://doi.org/10.37676/jmi.v12i1.273 doi: 10.37676/jmi.v12i1.273
    [21] Cynthia EP, Ismanto E (2017) Jaringan syaraf tiruan algoritma backpropagation dalam memprediksi ketersediaan komoditi pangan provinsi riau. RABIT Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi Univrab 2. https://doi.org/10.36341/rabit.v2i2.152 doi: 10.36341/rabit.v2i2.152
    [22] Aggarwal L, Sahoo BM (2018) Back propagation algorithm for computerized paper evaluation using neural network. IJSRST 4.
    [23] Bande S, Shete VV (2017) Smart flood disaster prediction system using IoT & neural networks, 2017 International Conference on Smart Technologies For Smart Nation (SmartTechCon), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1109/SmartTechCon.2017.8358367 doi: 10.1109/SmartTechCon.2017.8358367
    [24] Mitra P, Ray R, Chatterjee R, et al. (2016) Flood forecasting using Internet of things and artificial neural networks, 2016 IEEE 7th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMCON.2016.7746363 doi: 10.1109/IEMCON.2016.7746363
    [25] Alquisola GLV, Coronel DJA, Reolope BMF, et al. (2018) Prediction and visualization of the disaster risks in the Philippines using discrete wavelet transform (DWT), autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), and artificial neural network (ANN), 2018 3rd International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS), 146–149. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCOMS.2018.8463238
    [26] Wu J, Ming H, Xu J, (2021) Research on intelligent disaster prevention and mitigation method in high flood risk area of river basin based on artificial neural network, 2021 7th International Conference on Hydraulic and Civil Engineering & Smart Water Conservancy and Intelligent Disaster Reduction Forum (ICHCE & SWIDR), 943–952. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHCESWIDR54323.2021.9656352 doi: 10.1109/ICHCESWIDR54323.2021.9656352
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(622) PDF downloads(54) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(5)  /  Tables(3)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog