Based on the content analysis of the websites of 102 Spanish municipalities related to actions aligned with the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the X-STATIS technique was applied to analyze the status and dynamic evolution of commitment to the SDGs in regional and local governments over the period of 2016–2021. The results show a low but increasing level of SDG commitment, which also varies significantly across municipalities and regions, as well as by SDGs, which can be attributed to the influence of several sociodemographic factors, such as the number of inhabitants, dependent population and population density. SDG8 and SDG11 stand out as the main priorities of the municipalities, while initiatives related to SDG5, SDG6 and SDG 17 are the least prioritized. The COVID-19 pandemic has marked a turning point in this regard, with greater importance being given to the SDGs more related to people and prosperity. Our findings help citizens and public authorities to understand sustainable regions and municipalities, assess their performance in relation to different dimensions of sustainability and identify key challenges for future improvements. Specifically, the results suggest that public policies should promote actions related to gender equality, drinking water and sanitation and partnerships, as well as favor investment in the regions and municipalities that are lagging behind, in order to improve their level of commitment to the 2030 Agenda and reduce inequalities. From an academic point of view, our results open a door for the analysis of possible trajectories in the implementation of the SDGs at regional and local levels and the study of their determinants.
Citation: Manuel Rieiro-García, Víctor Amor-Esteban, Cristina Aibar-Guzmán. 'Localizing' the sustainable development goals: a multivariate analysis of Spanish regions[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2023, 10(3): 356-381. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2023021
Based on the content analysis of the websites of 102 Spanish municipalities related to actions aligned with the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the X-STATIS technique was applied to analyze the status and dynamic evolution of commitment to the SDGs in regional and local governments over the period of 2016–2021. The results show a low but increasing level of SDG commitment, which also varies significantly across municipalities and regions, as well as by SDGs, which can be attributed to the influence of several sociodemographic factors, such as the number of inhabitants, dependent population and population density. SDG8 and SDG11 stand out as the main priorities of the municipalities, while initiatives related to SDG5, SDG6 and SDG 17 are the least prioritized. The COVID-19 pandemic has marked a turning point in this regard, with greater importance being given to the SDGs more related to people and prosperity. Our findings help citizens and public authorities to understand sustainable regions and municipalities, assess their performance in relation to different dimensions of sustainability and identify key challenges for future improvements. Specifically, the results suggest that public policies should promote actions related to gender equality, drinking water and sanitation and partnerships, as well as favor investment in the regions and municipalities that are lagging behind, in order to improve their level of commitment to the 2030 Agenda and reduce inequalities. From an academic point of view, our results open a door for the analysis of possible trajectories in the implementation of the SDGs at regional and local levels and the study of their determinants.
| [1] |
Valencia S C, Simon D, Croese S, et al. (2019) Adapting the Sustainable Development Goals and the New Urban Agenda to the city level: Initial reflections from a comparative research project. Int J Urban Sustain 11: 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2019.1573172 doi: 10.1080/19463138.2019.1573172
|
| [2] | Hu A H, Huang L H, Chang Y L. (2016, September) Assessing corporate sustainability of the ICT sector in Taiwan on the basis of UN Sustainable Development Goals. In 2016 Electronics goes green 2016+(EGG) (pp. 1–6) IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EGG.2016.7829866 |
| [3] | Verboven H, Vanherck L. (2016) The sustainability paradox of the sharing economy. uwf UmweltWirtschaftsForum, 24: 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-016-0410-y |
| [4] |
ElMassah S, Mohieldin M (2020) Digital transformation and localizing the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Ecol Econ 169: 106490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106490 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106490
|
| [5] | UN Development Group. 2014. Localizing the Post-2015 Agenda: Dialogues on Implementation. New York. p. 6–7 |
| [6] | Oosterhof PD (2018) Localizing the Sustainable Development Goals to Accelerate Implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Gov Brief 33. http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/BRF189612 |
| [7] | Kanuri C, Revi A, Espey J, et al. (2016) Getting Started with the SDGs in Cities: A Guide for Stakeholders. Sustainable Development Solutions Network, NY, USA. |
| [8] |
Bardal KG, Reinar MB, Lundberg AK, et al. (2021) Factors Facilitating the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals in Regional and Local Planning—Experiences from Norway. Sustainability 13: 4282. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084282 doi: 10.3390/su13084282
|
| [9] |
Croese S, Oloko M, Simon D, et al. (2021) Bringing the global to the local: The challenges of multi-level governance for global policy implementation in Africa. Int J Urban Sustain Dev13: 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2021.1958335 doi: 10.1080/19463138.2021.1958335
|
| [10] |
Sisto R, García López J, Quintanilla A, et al. (2020) Quantitative analysis of the impact of public policies on the sustainable development goals through budget allocation and indicators. Sustainability 12: 10583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410583 doi: 10.3390/su122410583
|
| [11] |
Tavares A F, da Cruz NF (2020) Explaining the transparency of local government websites through a political market framework. Gov Inform Q 37: 101249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.005 doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.005
|
| [12] |
Fenton P, Gustafsson S (2017) Moving from high-level words to local action: governance for urban sustainability in municipalities. Curr Opin Environ Sust 26–27: 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.07.009 doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.07.009
|
| [13] | Gustafsson S, Ivner J (2018) Implementing the Global Sustainable Goals (SDGs) into Municipal Strategies Applying an Integrated Approach. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Handbook of Sustainability Science and Research. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63007-6_18 |
| [14] |
Schudson M (2020) The shortcomings of transparency for democracy. Am Behav Sci 64: 1670–1678. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276422094534 doi: 10.1177/000276422094534
|
| [15] |
Akande A, Cabral P, Gomes P, et al. (2019) The Lisbon ranking for smart sustainable cities in Europe. Sustain Cities Soc 44: 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.009 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.009
|
| [16] |
D'Adamo I, Gastaldi M, Ioppolo G, et al. (2022a) An analysis of Sustainable Development Goals in Italian cities: Performance measurements and policy implications. Land Use Policy 120: 106278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106278 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106278
|
| [17] |
D'Adamo I, Gastaldi M (2022) Sustainable Development Goals: A Regional Overview Based on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Sustainability 14: 9779. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159779 doi: 10.3390/su14159779
|
| [18] |
D'Adamo I, Gastaldi M, Morone P (2022b) Economic sustainable development goals: Assessments and perspectives in Europe. J Clean Prod 354: 131730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131730 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131730
|
| [19] |
Martínez-Córdoba PJ, Amor-Esteban V, Benito B, et al. (2021a) The commitment of Spanish local governments to Sustainable Development Goal 11 from a multivariate perspective. Sustainability 13: 1222. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031222 doi: 10.3390/su13031222
|
| [20] | United Nations General Assembly (2015) Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York. Available at: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol = A/RES/70/1 & Lang = E |
| [21] |
Martínez-Córdoba PJ, Raimo N, Vitolla F, et al. (2020) Achieving sustainable development goals. Efficiency in the Spanish clean water and sanitation sector. Sustainability 12: 3015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073015 doi: 10.3390/su12073015
|
| [22] | Alcaraz-Quiles FJ, Navarro-Galera A, Ortiz-Rodríguez D (2017) La transparencia sobre sostenibilidad en gobiernos regionales: el caso de España. Convergencia 24: 113–140. |
| [23] |
Navarro-Galera A, Alcaraz-Quiles FJ, Ortiz-Rodriguez D (2018) Enhancing sustainability transparency in local governments—An empirical research in Europe. Sustainability 10: 2161. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072161 doi: 10.3390/su10072161
|
| [24] |
García-Sánchez IM, Frías-Aceituno JV, Rodríguez-Domínguez L (2013) Determinants of corporate social disclosure in Spanish local governments. J Clean Prod 39: 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.037 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.037
|
| [25] |
Ribeiro VP, Aibar-Guzmán C, Aibar-Guzman B, et al. (2016) Determinants of environmental accounting and reporting practices in Portuguese local entities. Corp Commun 21: 352–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-11-2015-0071 doi: 10.1108/CCIJ-11-2015-0071
|
| [26] |
Lopez Subires MD, Alcaide Munoz L, Navarro Galera A, et al. (2019) The influence of socio-demographic factors on financial sustainability of public services: A comparative analysis in regional governments and local governments. Sustainability 11: 6008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216008 doi: 10.3390/su11216008
|
| [27] | Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing Inc. |
| [28] |
Rose J, Flak LS, Sæbø Ø (2018) Stakeholder theory for the E-government context: Framing a value-oriented normative core. Gov Inform Q 35: 362–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.06.005 doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2018.06.005
|
| [29] |
DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48: 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 doi: 10.2307/2095101
|
| [30] |
Navarro A, Alcaraz FJ, Ortiz D (2010) La Divulgación de Información Sobre Responsabilidad Corporativa en Administraciones Públicas: Un Estudio Empírico en Gobiernos Locales: The Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility Information in Public Administratons: An Empirical Study in Local Governments. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review 13: 285–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1138-4891(10)70019-4 doi: 10.1016/S1138-4891(10)70019-4
|
| [31] |
Guillamón MD, Bastida F, Benito B (2011) The determinants of local government's financial transparency. Local Gov Stud 37: 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2011.588704 doi: 10.1080/03003930.2011.588704
|
| [32] |
Prado-Lorenzo JM, García-Sánchez IM, Cuadrado-Ballesteros B (2012) Sustainable cities: do political factors determine the quality of life? J Clean Prod 21: 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.021 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.021
|
| [33] |
Bengtsson M (2016) How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. Nursing Plus open 2: 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001 doi: 10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
|
| [34] | Bonsón E, Flores F (2011) Social media and corporate dialogue: the response of global financial institutions. Online information review. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14684521111113579 |
| [35] |
Bonsón E, Torres L, Royo S, et al. (2012) Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Gov Inform Q 29: 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.10.001 doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2011.10.001
|
| [36] | Alcaraz-Quiles FJ, Galera AN, Ortiz‐Rodríguez D (2015) Les facteurs déterminant la publication en ligne par les gouvernements locaux des rapports sur la durabilité. Revue Internationale des Sciences Administratives 81: 85–115. |
| [37] |
Navarro-Galera A, Ruiz-Lozano M, Tirado-Valencia P, et al. (2017) Promoting sustainability transparency in European local governments: An empirical analysis based on administrative cultures. Sustainability 9: 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9030432 doi: 10.3390/su9030432
|
| [38] |
Ortiz-Rodríguez D, Navarro-Galera A, Alcaraz-Quiles FJ (2018) The influence of administrative culture on sustainability transparency in European local governments. Admin Soc 50: 555–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715616838 doi: 10.1177/0095399715616838
|
| [39] |
Amor-Esteban V, García-Sánchez IM, Galindo-Villardón MP (2018a) Analysing the effect of legal system on corporate social responsibility (CSR) at the country level, from a multivariate perspective. Soc Indic Res 140: 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1782-2 doi: 10.1007/s11205-017-1782-2
|
| [40] | García‐Sánchez IM, Amor‐Esteban V, Aibar‐Guzmán C, et al. (2022) Translating the 2030 Agenda into reality through stakeholder engagement. Sustain Dev https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2431 |
| [41] |
Amor-Esteban V, Galindo-Villardón MP, David F (2018b) Study of the importance of national identity in the development of corporate social responsibility practices: A multivariate vision. Adm Sci 8: 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8030050 doi: 10.3390/admsci8030050
|
| [42] |
Amor-Esteban V, Galindo-Villardón MP, García-Sánchez IM (2018c) Industry mimetic isomorphism and sustainable development based on the X-STATIS and HJ-biplot methods. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25: 26192–26208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2663-1 doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2663-1
|
| [43] |
Gallego-Alvarez I, Galindo-Villardón MP, Rodriguez-Rosa M (2015) Evolution of sustainability indicator worldwide: A study from the economic perspective based on the X-STATICO method. Ecol Indic 58: 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.025 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.025
|
| [44] |
Medina-Hernández EJ, Fernández-Gómez MJ, Barrera-Mellado I (2021) Analysis of time use surveys using co-statis: a multiway data analysis of gender inequalities in time use in Colombia. Sustainability 13: 13073. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313073 doi: 10.3390/su132313073
|
| [45] |
Prieto JM, Amor V, Turias I, et al. (2021) Evaluation of Paris MoU Maritime Inspections Using a STATIS Approach. Mathematics 9: 2092. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9172092 doi: 10.3390/math9172092
|
| [46] |
Gallego-Álvarez I, Rodríguez-Rosa M, Vicente-Galindo P (2021) Are worldwide governance indicators stable or do they change over time? A comparative study using multivariate analysis. Mathematics 9: 3257. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9243257 doi: 10.3390/math9243257
|
| [47] | Escoufier Y (1976) Opérateur associé à un Tableau de Données. In Annales de l'INSEE; Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (pp. 165.179). |
| [48] | L'Hermier des Plantes H (1976) Structuration des Tableauya trois Indices de la Statistique; Université Montpellier II, Montpellier, France. |
| [49] |
Thioulouse J, Chessel D, Dole S, et al. (1997) ADE-4: A multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Stat Comput 7: 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018513530268 doi: 10.1023/A:1018513530268
|
| [50] |
Alcaraz-Quiles FJ, Navarro-Galera A, Ortiz-Rodríguez D (2014) Factors influencing the transparency of sustainability information in regional governments: An empirical study. J Clean Prod 82: 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.086 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.086
|
| [51] |
Navarro-Galera A, Ortiz-Rodríguez D, Alcaraz-Quiles FJ (2019) Un impulso a la transparencia sobre sostenibilidad en gobiernos locales europeos mediante factores poblacionales, socioeconómicos, financieros y legales. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting/Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 48: 525–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2019.1629204 doi: 10.1080/02102412.2019.1629204
|
| [52] |
Martínez-Córdoba PJ, Benito B, García-Sánchez IM. (2021b) Efficiency in the governance of the Covid-19 pandemic: political and territorial factors. Globalization health 17: 113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00759-4 doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00759-4
|
| [53] |
Cheng Y, Liu H, Wang S, et al. (2021). Global action on SDGs: policy review and outlook in a post-pandemic Era. Sustainability 13: 6461. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116461 doi: 10.3390/su13116461
|
| [54] |
Hartanto D, Siregar SM (2021) Determinants of overall public trust in local government: Meditation of government response to COVID-19 in Indonesian context. Transform Gov-People 15: 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-08-2020-0193 doi: 10.1108/TG-08-2020-0193
|
| [55] |
Padeiro M, Bueno-Larraz B, Freitas  (2021) Local governments' use of social media during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Portugal. Gov Inform Q 38: 101620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101620 doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101620
|
| [56] | Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (2020) SDSN Italy SDGs City Index. Available at: https://www.feem.it/m/publications_pages/rpt-2020-city-index.pdf.Accessed March 25, 2023 |
| [57] |
Masuda H, Kawakubo S, Okitasari M, et al. (2022) Exploring the role of local governments as intermediaries to facilitate partnerships for the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustain Cities Soc 82: 103883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103883 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103883
|
| [58] | Armstrong A, Li Y (2022) Governance and sustainability in local government. Australas Account Bu 16: 12–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v16i2.3 |
| [59] |
Conard B (2013) Some Challenges to Sustainability. Sustainability 2013: 3368–3381. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5083368 doi: 10.3390/su5083368
|
Figures(7) / Tables(7)
Manuel Rieiro-García, Víctor Amor-Esteban, Cristina Aibar-Guzmán. 'Localizing' the sustainable development goals: a multivariate analysis of Spanish regions[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2023, 10(3): 356-381. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2023021
DownLoad: