Research article Special Issues

Significant factors affecting public transport use for leisure travel and tourism

  • Received: 16 May 2022 Revised: 16 October 2022 Accepted: 14 November 2022 Published: 28 December 2022
  • Tourists' preferences for public transport at destinations are homogeneous, while the choice of private transport services is heterogeneous. This paper examined several facets of the existing public transport system to understand tourists' disapproval of the mode choice for pleasurable holiday travel in Lagos, Nigeria. The urban transport services were adjudged based on tourists' perceptions of satisfaction with service features related to mode choice. Statistical and structured analyses were used to explore the association between usage decisions and satisfaction with public transport services. The link between mode choice tolerability and usage decisions was identified using Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis. The principal component analysis (PCA) identified three (3) main factors comprising 16 service dimensions influencing the choice of public transport. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Barlett tests confirmed the sampling adequacy for each variable in each factor and the combined elements. The analyses quantified the association between variables and tourists' usage decisions. The relationship between satisfaction and the variables explained the variation in satisfaction with the quality aspects of public transportation. Thus, the findings expressly explained tourists' usual dissatisfaction with Lagos public transport system for leisure excursions.

    Citation: Olakunle Oloruntobi, Safizahanin Mokhtar, Muhammad Zaly Shah, Kasypi Mokhtar. Significant factors affecting public transport use for leisure travel and tourism[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2023, 10(1): 63-81. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2023004

    Related Papers:

  • Tourists' preferences for public transport at destinations are homogeneous, while the choice of private transport services is heterogeneous. This paper examined several facets of the existing public transport system to understand tourists' disapproval of the mode choice for pleasurable holiday travel in Lagos, Nigeria. The urban transport services were adjudged based on tourists' perceptions of satisfaction with service features related to mode choice. Statistical and structured analyses were used to explore the association between usage decisions and satisfaction with public transport services. The link between mode choice tolerability and usage decisions was identified using Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis. The principal component analysis (PCA) identified three (3) main factors comprising 16 service dimensions influencing the choice of public transport. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Barlett tests confirmed the sampling adequacy for each variable in each factor and the combined elements. The analyses quantified the association between variables and tourists' usage decisions. The relationship between satisfaction and the variables explained the variation in satisfaction with the quality aspects of public transportation. Thus, the findings expressly explained tourists' usual dissatisfaction with Lagos public transport system for leisure excursions.



    加载中


    [1] Dubois G, Peeters P, Ceron JP, et al. (2011) The future tourism mobility of the world population: Emission growth versus climate policy. Transport Res A: Pol 45: 1031–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2009.11.004 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2009.11.004
    [2] Yuksek G, AkkoÇ IT, Bayer RU (2016) The effects of public transport performance on destination satisfaction. Afr J Hospitality, Tourism Leisure 5: 1–12.
    [3] Bauder M, Freytag T (2015) Visitor mobility in the city and the effects of travel preparation. Tourism Geogr 17: 682–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2015.1053971 doi: 10.1080/14616688.2015.1053971
    [4] Shimauchi T (2020) Reinventing public transport system in Luxembourg and its implications for foreign tourists. J Global Tour Res 5: 161–166. https://doi.org/10.37020/jgtr.5.2_161 doi: 10.37020/jgtr.5.2_161
    [5] Peeters P, Higham J, Cohen S, et al. (2019) Desirable tourism transport futures. J Sustain Tour 27: 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2018.1477785 doi: 10.1080/09669582.2018.1477785
    [6] Holden E (2016) In: Achieving sustainable mobility: Everyday and leisure-time travel in the EU, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315565491
    [7] Chiou YC, Jou RC, Yang CH (2015) Factors affecting public transportation usage rate: Geographically weighted regression. Transport Res A: Pol 78: 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.05.016 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.05.016
    [8] Nwachukwu AA, Gladys NI, Chikezie OK (2019) Tourists' satisfaction with public transport services in Lagos, Nigeria. AUC Geogr 54: 67–80. https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2019.7 doi: 10.14712/23361980.2019.7
    [9] Oloruntobi OO, Safizahanin M, Zaly-Shah M (2019) Tourists perception of public transit services for leisure travel satisfaction in Lagos. IJRTE 8: 5702–5709. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.D8370.118419 doi: 10.35940/ijrte.D8370.118419
    [10] Mathilde C (2021) Number of Buses for Transportation of Tourists in Mexico in 2019, by State. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/858208/number-tourist-transport-buses-mexico-state/.
    [11] Bajada T, Titheridge H (2017) The attitudes of tourists towards a bus service: Implications for policy from a Maltese case study. Transp Res Procedia 25: 4110–4129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.342 doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.342
    [12] Prayag G, Cohen SA, Yan HL (2015) Potential Chinese travellers to Western Europe: Segmenting motivations and service expectations. Curr Issues Tour 18: 725–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2013.868413 doi: 10.1080/13683500.2013.868413
    [13] Antoniou C, Tyrinopoulos Y (2013) Factors affecting public transport use in touristic areas. Int J Transp 1: 91–112. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijt.2013.1.1.06 doi: 10.14257/ijt.2013.1.1.06
    [14] Pawlasová P (2015) The factors influencing satisfaction with public city transport: A structural equation modelling approach. J Competitiveness 7: 18–32. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2015.04.02 doi: 10.7441/joc.2015.04.02
    [15] Van Lierop D, Badami MG, El-Geneidy AM (2018) What influences satisfaction and loyalty in public transport? A review of the literature. Transport Rev 38: 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1298683 doi: 10.1080/01441647.2017.1298683
    [16] Hall CM, Le-Klähn DT, Ram Y (2017) In: Tourism, public transport and sustainable mobility, Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Channel View Publications. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781845415990
    [17] Langkaweekate H, Anantamongkolkul C, Supornhemhiran N, et al. (2021) Tourists' satisfaction of public transport use in Phuket. JITT 17: 1–17. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jitt/article/view/245304
    [18] Gutiérrez A, Miravet D (2016) The determinants of tourist use of public transport at the destination. Sustainability 8: 908. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090908 doi: 10.3390/su8090908
    [19] Wang ZF (2014) Tourists' perception of urban public transport, satisfaction and behavioral intention in Zhangjiajie city, China. Geogr Res 33: 978–987. https://doi.org/10.11821/dlyj201405015 doi: 10.11821/dlyj201405015
    [20] Aktaş A, Çevirgen A, Toker B (2009) Assessing holiday satisfaction of German and Russian tourists visiting Alanya. Tour Hosp Manag 15: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.15.1.1 doi: 10.20867/thm.15.1.1
    [21] Parahoo SK, Harvey HL, Radi GYA (2014) Satisfaction of tourists with public transport: An empirical investigation in Dubai. J Travel Tour Mark 31: 1004–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2014.890158 doi: 10.1080/10548408.2014.890158
    [22] Rebstock M (2017) Economic benefits of improved accessibility to transport systems and the role of transport in fostering tourism for all. International Transport Forum Discussion Paper, 2017-04.
    [23] Le-Klaehn DT, Hall CM (2015) Tourist use of public transport at destinations–a review. Curr Issues Tour 18: 785–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2014.948812 doi: 10.1080/13683500.2014.948812
    [24] Virkar AR, Mallya PD (2018) A review of dimensions of tourism transport affecting tourist satisfaction. Indian J Commer Manage Stud 9: 72–80. http://doi.org/10.18843/ijcms/v9i1/10 doi: 10.18843/ijcms/v9i1/10
    [25] Fernández Abenoza R (2017) Improving travel satisfaction with public transport. PhD thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
    [26] Ramos S, Vicente P, Passos AM, et al. (2019) Perceptions of the public transport service as a barrier to the adoption of public transport: A qualitative study. Soc Sci 8: 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8050150 doi: 10.3390/socsci8050150
    [27] Loi LTI, So ASI, Lo IS, et al. (2017) Does the quality of tourist shuttles influence revisit intention through destination image and satisfaction? The case of Macao. J Hosp Tour Manag 32: 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2017.06.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2017.06.002
    [28] Le-Kläehn DT, Roosen J, Gerike R, et al. (2015) Factors affecting tourists' public transport use and areas visited at destinations. Tourism Geogr 17: 738–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2015.1084527 doi: 10.1080/14616688.2015.1084527
    [29] Herle FA (2018) The impact of destination image on tourists' satisfaction and loyalty in the context of domestic tourism. Mark–Inf Decis J 1: 14–26. https://sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/midj-2018-0007 doi: 10.2478/midj-2018-0007
    [30] Pérez Campdesuñer R, García Vidal G, Sánchez Rodríguez A, et al. (2017) Structural equation model: Influence on tourist satisfaction with destination attributes. Tour Hosp Manag 23: 219–233. https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.23.2.2 doi: 10.20867/thm.23.2.2
    [31] Pallant J (2013) In: SPSS survival manual, 6th Eds., London: McGraw-Hill Education (UK). http://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117407
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3333) PDF downloads(218) Cited by(1)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(2)  /  Tables(7)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog