Greening through taxation: assessing the potential opportunities and challenges of plastic products in Ethiopia

Goshu Desalegn; Anita Tangl; Maria Fekete-Farkas; Goshu Desalegn; Anita Tangl; Maria Fekete-Farkas

doi:10.3934/environsci.2022026

AIMS Environmental Science

2022, Volume 9, Issue 4: 432-443. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2022026

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Greening through taxation: assessing the potential opportunities and challenges of plastic products in Ethiopia

1.
Doctoral school of Economics and Regional Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life sciences, Hungary
2.
Institute of Rural Development and Sustainable Economy, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Szent István Campus, Hungary
3.
Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Szent István Campus, Hungary

Received: 22 March 2022 Revised: 05 June 2022 Accepted: 15 June 2022 Published: 04 July 2022

The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential opportunities and challenges of plastic products in Ethiopia. The study is qualitative in nature and a descriptive research design with the in-depth interview was used. The study employed both primary and secondary sources of data to investigate the study on hand. More specifically purposive sampling techniques were used to select the respondents for the interview. Discourse analysis was used in the study to recognize discursive interaction as a valuable tool for determining opinions, ideas, and facts about plastic products in Ethiopia. The study developed two different storylines regarding the opportunities and challenges of plastic products. As a result, the first storyline (S1) used taxing plastic products as an alternative strategy. The second storyline (S2) used banning plastic products as opoosing strategy. The study finding implies that having a tax on plastic products could provide more opportunities for the country than banning them. More specifically, taxing plastic products will be more appropriate for the generation of revenue, employment, industrial process, construction process, and recycling in Ethiopia. On the other hand, a lack of proper collection systems, separation of the source of disposal, a properly designed operating system, clear authorities and sanitation rules, organizational capacity, and unreliable collection services were found to existing challenges of plastic products. Governments and policymakers shall play a critical role in developing the necessary legislative framework to encourage mitigation actions that contribute to the reduction of plastic waste at the source, as well as encouraging the cleanup of plastic pollution on coastlines. Public discussion on alternative packaging than the one-time use of plastic products is also needed. Public awareness is required to change customer attitudes, and separation of organic and non-organic waste across the cities.
- greening through taxation,
- plastic products,
- opportunities,
- and challenges
Citation: Goshu Desalegn, Anita Tangl, Maria Fekete-Farkas. Greening through taxation: assessing the potential opportunities and challenges of plastic products in Ethiopia[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2022, 9(4): 432-443. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2022026

Related Papers:

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential opportunities and challenges of plastic products in Ethiopia. The study is qualitative in nature and a descriptive research design with the in-depth interview was used. The study employed both primary and secondary sources of data to investigate the study on hand. More specifically purposive sampling techniques were used to select the respondents for the interview. Discourse analysis was used in the study to recognize discursive interaction as a valuable tool for determining opinions, ideas, and facts about plastic products in Ethiopia. The study developed two different storylines regarding the opportunities and challenges of plastic products. As a result, the first storyline (S1) used taxing plastic products as an alternative strategy. The second storyline (S2) used banning plastic products as opoosing strategy. The study finding implies that having a tax on plastic products could provide more opportunities for the country than banning them. More specifically, taxing plastic products will be more appropriate for the generation of revenue, employment, industrial process, construction process, and recycling in Ethiopia. On the other hand, a lack of proper collection systems, separation of the source of disposal, a properly designed operating system, clear authorities and sanitation rules, organizational capacity, and unreliable collection services were found to existing challenges of plastic products. Governments and policymakers shall play a critical role in developing the necessary legislative framework to encourage mitigation actions that contribute to the reduction of plastic waste at the source, as well as encouraging the cleanup of plastic pollution on coastlines. Public discussion on alternative packaging than the one-time use of plastic products is also needed. Public awareness is required to change customer attitudes, and separation of organic and non-organic waste across the cities.

References

[1]	Neto AM, Gomes TS, Pertel M, et al. (2021) An overview of plastic straw policies in the Americas. Marine Pollution Bulletin 172: 112813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112813 doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112813
[2]	Leal Filho W, Saari U, Fedoruk M, et al. (2019) An overview of the problems posed by plastic products and the role of extended producer responsibility in Europe. Journal of cleaner production 214: 550-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.256 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.256
[3]	Liu C, Nguyen TT, Ishimura Y, et.al (2021) Current situation and key challenges on the use of single-use plastic in Hanoi. Waste Management 121: 422-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.12.033 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.12.033
[4]	Leonard S, Barra R (2018) Plastics and the Circular Economy. Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel to the Global Environment Facility. The Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel (STAP) to the Global Environment Facility.
[5]	Dikgang J, Leiman A, Visser M (2012) Analysis of the plastic-bag levy in South Africa. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 66: 59-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.06.009 doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.06.009
[6]	Parry IW (2012) Reforming the tax system to promote environmental objectives: An application to Mauritius. Ecological Economics 77: 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.02.014 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.02.014
[7]	Song P, Mao X, Corsetti G (2015) Adjusting export tax rebates to reduce the environmental impacts of trade: Lessons from China. Journal of Environmental Management 161: 408-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.029 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.029
[8]	McAusland C (2021) Carbon taxes and footprint leakage: Spoilsport effects. Journal of Public Economics 204; 104531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104531
[9]	Saelim S (2019) Carbon tax incidence on household consumption: Heterogeneity across socio-economic factors in Thailand. Economic Analysis and Policy 62: 159-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2019.02.003 doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2019.02.003
[10]	Syberg K, Nielsen MB, Clausen LPW, et al. (2021) Regulation of plastic from a circular economy perspective. Current opinion in green and sustainable chemistry 29: 100462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2021.100462 doi: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2021.100462
[11]	Dissou Y, Siddiqui MS (2014) Can carbon taxes be progressive? Energy Economics 42: 88-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.11.010
[12]	Sun Z, Dong J (2011) Research on Green Taxation Policy for Promoting Low-Carbon Economy. In Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference, IEEE Computer Society, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/APPEEC.2011.5749152
[13]	Bachus K (2016) How to tell green from grey? Towards a methodological framework for evaluating the greening of national tax systems. Ecological Indicators 71: 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.009 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.009
[14]	Norouzi N, Fani M, Talebi S, et al. (2022) Green tax as a path to greener economy: A game theory approach on energy and final goods in Iran. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 156: 111968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111968 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111968
[15]	Nyathi B, Togo CA (2020) Overview of legal and policy framework approaches for plastic bag waste management in African countries. Journal of environmental and public health, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8892773 doi: 10.1155/2020/8892773
[16]	Regassa N, Sundaraa RD, Seboka BB, et al. (2011) Challenges and opportunities in municipal solid waste management: The case of Addis Ababa city, central Ethiopia. Journal of human ecology 33: 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2011.11906358 doi: 10.1080/09709274.2011.11906358
[17]	Hodges BD, Kuper A, Reeves S (2008) Discourse analysis. Bmj 337. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a879
[18]	Joss S, Sengers F, Schraven D, et al. (2019) The smart city as global discourse: Storylines and critical junctures across 27 cities. Journal of urban technology 26: 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2018.1558387 doi: 10.1080/10630732.2018.1558387
[19]	Walker T, Gramlich D, Dumont-Bergeron A, et al. (2020) The case for a plastic tax: a review of its benefits and disadvantages within a circular economy. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2514-175920200000004010
[20]	Owusu-Sekyere E, Osumanu IK, Abdul-Kadri Y, et al. (2013) An analysis of the plastic waste collection and wealth linkages in Ghana.
[21]	Behuria P (2019) The comparative political economy of plastic bag bans in East Africa: why implementation has varied in Rwanda, Kenya and Uganda (No. 372019). GDI, The University of Manchester.
[22]	Chasse C (2018) Evaluation of legal strategies for the reduction of plastic bag consumption. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
[23]	He H (2012) Effects of environmental policy on consumption: lessons from the Chinese plastic bag regulation. Environment and Development Economics 17: 407-431. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X1200006X doi: 10.1017/S1355770X1200006X
[24]	Poortinga W, Sautkina E, Thomas GO, et al. (2016) The English plastic bag charge: Changes in attitudes and behaviour.
[25]	Wagner TP (2017) Reducing single-use plastic shopping bags in the USA. Waste Management 70: 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.09.003 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.09.003
[26]	Poortinga W, Whitmarsh L, Suffolk C, et al. (2013) The introduction of a single-use carrier bag charge in Wales: Attitude change and behavioural spillover effects. Journal of Environmental Psychology 36: 240-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.09.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.09.001
[27]	Willis K, Maureaud C, Wilcox C, et al. (2018) How successful are waste abatement campaigns and government policies at reducing plastic waste into the marine environment? Marine Policy 96: 243-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.11.037

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)