In the context of sustainable energy development to reduce carbon emissions, the application of new energy sources and smart grid technologies in power systems is becoming more widespread. However, current research results on power system technology strategies for carbon emission reduction are not satisfactory. To address this problem, a model for optimal power system operation and scheduling based on the prediction error mechanism and synthetic fuel technology is proposed. The model used the carbon trading mechanism to further reduce carbon emissions and the carnivorous plant algorithm to optimize the scheduling strategy. The results indicate that the model demonstrates significant advantages in terms of carbon emission, total operating cost, prediction accuracy, and energy utilization efficiency, respectively, at 60.8 kg, 2517.5 yuan, 96.5%, and 90.2%, indicating that it utilizes energy more fully and helps to enhance the overall energy efficiency of the system. The calculation time of the optimized power system was only 12.5 s, the stability was as high as 98.7%, and the satisfaction rate was 95.6% in terms of user satisfaction. Compared to other contemporary designs, the proposed model can successfully reduce the system's carbon emissions while increasing energy efficiency. The model has positive implications for smart grid and sustainable development.
Citation: Kangli Xiang, Keren Chen, Simin Chen, Wanqing Chen, Jinyu Chen. Model for sustainable carbon emission reduction energy development and smart grid technology strategy[J]. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(6): 1206-1224. doi: 10.3934/energy.2024055
In the context of sustainable energy development to reduce carbon emissions, the application of new energy sources and smart grid technologies in power systems is becoming more widespread. However, current research results on power system technology strategies for carbon emission reduction are not satisfactory. To address this problem, a model for optimal power system operation and scheduling based on the prediction error mechanism and synthetic fuel technology is proposed. The model used the carbon trading mechanism to further reduce carbon emissions and the carnivorous plant algorithm to optimize the scheduling strategy. The results indicate that the model demonstrates significant advantages in terms of carbon emission, total operating cost, prediction accuracy, and energy utilization efficiency, respectively, at 60.8 kg, 2517.5 yuan, 96.5%, and 90.2%, indicating that it utilizes energy more fully and helps to enhance the overall energy efficiency of the system. The calculation time of the optimized power system was only 12.5 s, the stability was as high as 98.7%, and the satisfaction rate was 95.6% in terms of user satisfaction. Compared to other contemporary designs, the proposed model can successfully reduce the system's carbon emissions while increasing energy efficiency. The model has positive implications for smart grid and sustainable development.
| [1] |
Butt OM, Zulqarnain M, Butt TM (2021) Recent advancement in smart grid technology: Future prospects in the electrical power network. Ain Shams Eng J 12: 687-695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.05.004 doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2020.05.004
|
| [2] |
Priyanka EB, Thangavel S, Gao XZ (2021) Review analysis on cloud computing based smart grid technology in the oil pipeline sensor network system. Pet Res 6: 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptlrs.2020.10.001 doi: 10.1016/j.ptlrs.2020.10.001
|
| [3] |
Pal R, Chavhan S, Gupta D, et al. (2021) A comprehensive review on IoT‐based infrastructure for smart grid applications. IET Renewable Power Gener 15: 3761-3776. https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.12272 doi: 10.1049/rpg2.12272
|
| [4] |
Lopez J, Rubio JE, Alcaraz C (2021) Digital twins for intelligent authorization in the B5G-enabled smart grid. IEEE Wireless Commun 28: 48-55. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.001.2000336 doi: 10.1109/MWC.001.2000336
|
| [5] |
Li Y, Yan J (2022) Cybersecurity of smart inverters in the smart grid: A survey. IEEE Trans Power Electron 38: 2364-2383. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2022.3206239 doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2022.3206239
|
| [6] | Xu S, Yu B (2021) Current development and prospect of hydrogen energy technology in China. J Beijing Inst Technol (Social Sciences Edition) 23: 1-12. htps:/doi.org10.159185 jbitss1009-3370.2021.3061 |
| [7] |
Pingkuo L, Xue H (2022) Comparative analysis on similarities and differences of hydrogen energy development in the World's top 4 largest economies: A novel framework. Int J Hydrogen Energy 47: 9485-9503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.038 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.038
|
| [8] |
Tarasov BP, Fursikov PV, Volodin AA, et al. (2021) Metal hydride hydrogen storage and compression systems for energy storage technologies. Int J Hydrogen Energy 46: 13647-13657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.085 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.085
|
| [9] |
Diaz IU, de Queiróz Lamas W, Lotero RC (2023) Development of an optimization model for the feasibility analysis of hydrogen application as energy storage system in microgrids. Int J Hydrogen Energy 48: 16159-16175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.128 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.128
|
| [10] |
Zhang X (2021) The development trend of and suggestions for China's hydrogen energy industry. Engineering 7: 719-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2021.04.012 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2021.04.012
|
| [11] |
Abomazid AM, El-Taweel NA, Farag HEZ (2022) Optimal energy management of hydrogen energy facility using integrated battery energy storage and solar photovoltaic systems. IEEE Trans Sustainable Energy 13: 1457-1468. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2022.3161891 doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2022.3161891
|
| [12] |
Shao C, Feng C, Shahidehpour M, et al. (2021) Optimal stochastic operation of integrated electric power and renewable energy with vehicle-based hydrogen energy system. IEEE Trans Power Syst 36: 4310-4321. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3058561 doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3058561
|
| [13] |
Qays MO, Ahmad I, Abu-Siada A, et al. (2023) Key communication technologies, applications, protocols and future guides for IoT-assisted smart grid systems: A review. Energy Rep 9: 2440-2452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.01.085 doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.01.085
|
| [14] |
Jenkins JD, Sepulveda NA (2021) Long-duration energy storage: A blueprint for research and innovation. Joule 5: 2241-2246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2021.08.002 doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2021.08.002
|
| [15] |
Magdy G, Bakeer A, Alhasheem M (2021) Superconducting energy storage technology-based synthetic inertia system control to enhance frequency dynamic performance in microgrids with high renewable penetration. Prot Control Mod Power Syst 6: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41601-021-00212-z doi: 10.1186/s41601-021-00212-z
|
| [16] |
Chatterjee S, Parsapur RK, Huang KW (2021) Limitations of ammonia as a hydrogen energy carrier for the transportation sector. ACS Energy Lett 6: 4390-4394. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.1c02189 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c02189
|
| [17] |
Li J, Gu C, Xiang Y, et al. (2022) Edge-cloud computing systems for smart grid: state-of-the-art, architecture, and applications. J Mod Power Syst Clean Energy 10: 805-817. https://doi.org/10.35833/MPCE.2021.000161 doi: 10.35833/MPCE.2021.000161
|
| [18] |
Ari I (2023) A low carbon pathway for the turkish electricity generation sector. Green Low-Carbon Econ 1: 147-153. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewGLCE3202552 doi: 10.47852/bonviewGLCE3202552
|
| [19] |
Xu X, Zhou Q, Yu D (2022) The future of hydrogen energy: Bio-hydrogen production technology. Int J Hydrogen Energy 47: 33677-33698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.261 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.261
|
| [20] |
Scovell MD (2022) Explaining hydrogen energy technology acceptance: A critical review. Int J Hydrogen Energy 47: 10441-10459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.099 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.099
|
| [21] |
Liu X, Liu X, Jiang Y, et al. (2022) Photovoltaics and energy storage integrated flexible direct current distribution systems of buildings: definition, technology review, and application. CSEE J Power Energy Syst 9: 829-845. https://doi.org/10.17775/CSEEJPES.2022.04850 doi: 10.17775/CSEEJPES.2022.04850
|
| [22] |
Așchilean I, Cobȋrzan N, Bolboaca A, et al. (2021) Pairing solar power to sustainable energy storage solutions within a residential building: A case study. Int J Energy Res 45: 15495-15511. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.6982 doi: 10.1002/er.6982
|
| [23] |
Kaur A, Narang N (2024) Multi-objective generation scheduling of integrated energy system using hybrid optimization technique. Neural Comput Appl 36: 1215-1236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-09091-x doi: 10.1007/s00521-023-09091-x
|
| [24] |
Zhong Z, Fan N, Wu L (2024) Multistage robust optimization for the day-ahead scheduling of hybrid thermal-hydro-wind-solar systems. J Global Optim 88: 999-1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-023-01328-2 doi: 10.1007/s10898-023-01328-2
|
| [25] |
Liu Z, Huang B, Hu X, et al. (2023) Blockchain-based renewable energy trading using information entropy theory. IEEE Trans Network Sci Eng 11: 5564-5575. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSE.2023.3238110 doi: 10.1109/TNSE.2023.3238110
|
| [26] |
Sun Q, Han R, Zhang H, et al. (2015) A multiagent-based consensus algorithm for distributed coordinated control of distributed generators in the energy internet. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 6: 3006-3019. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2015.2412779 doi: 10.1109/TSG.2015.2412779
|
Figures(11) / Tables(4)
Kangli Xiang, Keren Chen, Simin Chen, Wanqing Chen, Jinyu Chen. Model for sustainable carbon emission reduction energy development and smart grid technology strategy[J]. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(6): 1206-1224. doi: 10.3934/energy.2024055
DownLoad: