Parameter | Value |
Minimum minigrid power | 10 kW |
Maximum minigrid power | 10 MW |
Power consumption per household | 1 kW |
Maximum power requirement for the entire population | 200 kW |
Minimum wind speed | 4 m/s |
Green hydrogen is produced from water and solar, wind, and/or hydro energy via electrolysis and is considered to be a key component for reaching net zero by 2050. While green hydrogen currently represents only a few percent of all produced hydrogen, mainly from fossil fuels, significant investments into scaling up green hydrogen production, reaching some hundreds of billions of dollars, will drastically change this within the next 10 years with the price of green hydrogen being expected to fall from today's US$ 5 per kg to US$ 1–2 per kg. The Australian Government announced a two billion Australian dollar fund for the production of green hydrogen, explicitly excluding projects to produce hydrogen from fossil fuels, like methane. This article reviews current perspectives regarding the production of green hydrogen and its carbon footprint, potential major applications of green hydrogen, and policy considerations in regards to guarantee of origin schemes for green hydrogen and hydrogen safety standards.
Citation: Peter Majewski, Fatemeh Salehi, Ke Xing. Green hydrogen[J]. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(5): 878-895. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023042
[1] | W. E. P. Sampath Ediriweera, N. W. A. Lidula, R. Samarasinghe . Ring connected microgrid clusters for improved resiliency in distribution systems with high solar PV penetration. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(4): 872-904. doi: 10.3934/energy.2024041 |
[2] | Lei Liu, Takeyoshi Kato, Paras Mandal, Alexey Mikhaylov, Ashraf M. Hemeida, Hiroshi Takahashi, Tomonobu Senjyu . Two cases studies of Model Predictive Control approach for hybrid Renewable Energy Systems. AIMS Energy, 2021, 9(6): 1241-1259. doi: 10.3934/energy.2021057 |
[3] | Syed Sabir Hussain Rizvi, Krishna Teerth Chaturvedi, Mohan Lal Kolhe . A review on peak shaving techniques for smart grids. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(4): 723-752. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023036 |
[4] | Eugene Freeman, Davide Occello, Frank Barnes . Energy storage for electrical systems in the USA. AIMS Energy, 2016, 4(6): 856-875. doi: 10.3934/energy.2016.6.856 |
[5] | Surender Reddy Salkuti . Sustainable energy technologies for emerging renewable energy and electric vehicles. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(6): 1264-1270. doi: 10.3934/energy.2024057 |
[6] | Athanasia Orfanou, Stergios Vakalis . Wind based hybrid systems for increased RES penetration in isolated grids: The case study of Anafi (Greece). AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(5): 1046-1058. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022048 |
[7] | Habibullah Fedayi, Mikaeel Ahmadi, Abdul Basir Faiq, Naomitsu Urasaki, Tomonobu Senjyu . BESS based voltage stability improvement enhancing the optimal control of real and reactive power compensation. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(3): 535-552. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022027 |
[8] | Ryuto Shigenobu, Oludamilare Bode Adewuyi, Atsushi Yona, Tomonobu Senjyu . Demand response strategy management with active and reactive power incentive in the smart grid: a two-level optimization approach. AIMS Energy, 2017, 5(3): 482-505. doi: 10.3934/energy.2017.3.482 |
[9] | Jin H. Jo, Zachary Rose, Jamie Cross, Evan Daebel, Andrew Verderber, John C. Kostelnick . Application of Airborne LiDAR Data and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to Develop a Distributed Generation System for the Town of Normal, IL. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(2): 173-183. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.2.173 |
[10] | Zeid Al Qaisi, Qais Alsafasfeh, Ahmad Harb . Stability impact of integrated small scale hybrid (PV/Wind) system with electric distribution network. AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(5): 832-845. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.5.832 |
Green hydrogen is produced from water and solar, wind, and/or hydro energy via electrolysis and is considered to be a key component for reaching net zero by 2050. While green hydrogen currently represents only a few percent of all produced hydrogen, mainly from fossil fuels, significant investments into scaling up green hydrogen production, reaching some hundreds of billions of dollars, will drastically change this within the next 10 years with the price of green hydrogen being expected to fall from today's US$ 5 per kg to US$ 1–2 per kg. The Australian Government announced a two billion Australian dollar fund for the production of green hydrogen, explicitly excluding projects to produce hydrogen from fossil fuels, like methane. This article reviews current perspectives regarding the production of green hydrogen and its carbon footprint, potential major applications of green hydrogen, and policy considerations in regards to guarantee of origin schemes for green hydrogen and hydrogen safety standards.
Centralized control systems have emerged as a critical element in the advancement and implementation of microgrid networks, particularly in remote or isolated areas where centralized grid systems are unavailable. The integration of renewable energy sources and distributed energy storage systems has necessitated the need for efficient energy management and distribution. Centralized control systems are designed to enhance the performance, stability and resilience of microgrid networks. In a study, an offline adaptive control approach for a microgrid operating in an islanded mode was presented. This approach employed a cascade structure comprising power, voltage and current controllers. The power controller utilized droop characteristics while the voltage and current loops employed optimal proportional-integral (PI) controllers. The parameters of these controllers were optimized using the model reference adaptive control (MRAC) method and genetic algorithm for improved performance [1]. A similar study conducted by [2] tackled the crucial challenge of designing control systems for islanded microgrids. The authors placed significant emphasis on effectively coordinating distributed energy resources and managing loads within the microgrid network. To address this issue, they proposed a hierarchical control architecture comprising a centralized control unit as well as decentralized control units dedicated to individual energy sources and loads. The primary objective of this approach was to optimize the overall performance and efficiency of the microgrid system while simultaneously ensuring a reliable power supply to the connected loads. The study demonstrated that the proposed control system effectively achieved energy resource and demand balance, improved energy efficiency and enhanced the overall reliability of the microgrid. In a comparable study by [3] presented a centralized control system for an islanded microgrid which successfully integrated renewable energy sources and energy storage systems. The authors employed a model predictive control (MPC) algorithm to optimize energy management and distribution within the microgrid network. The findings of the study revealed that the proposed control system effectively achieved a harmonious balance between energy resources and demand leading to improved energy efficiency and reduced reliance on traditional energy sources. Building upon these advancements, a more recent study conducted by [4] proposed a decentralized control system for an islanded microgrid that integrated renewable energy sources, energy storage systems and demand response strategies. The authors adopted a game-theoretic approach to coordinate energy management and distribution within the microgrid network. The study demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed control system in attaining a balanced integration of energy resources and demand resulting in enhanced energy efficiency and heightened microgrid reliability. Recent studies have been dedicated to advancing the design and implementation of centralized control systems in minigrids. One such study conducted by [5] introduced a centralized control system for an islanded microgrid, integrating wind and photovoltaic power generation, energy storage and load demand. This control system aimed to effectively balance energy resources and demand by making informed decisions on resource utilization and monitoring energy transactions within the minigrid. The findings of the study demonstrated that the proposed control system significantly enhanced the efficiency and stability of the microgrid. Similarly, a study by [6] proposed a decentralized control strategy for a microgrid that integrated photovoltaic power generation, energy storage and load demand. The control system's primary objective was to monitor critical energy parameters, including voltage, current, frequency and mechanical energy and ensure they remained within specified ranges. The study showcased the effectiveness of the proposed control strategy in improving the reliability and stability of the microgrid. These recent studies have made notable contributions to the field of minigrid control systems, offering valuable insights into enhancing efficiency, stability, reliability and resource utilization within microgrid networks.
The integration of renewable energy sources and distributed energy storage systems into microgrid networks has garnered increasing attention in recent years, particularly in remote or islanded areas where centralized grid systems are unavailable. Centralized control systems play a crucial role in enhancing the performance, stability and resilience of microgrids by effectively managing energy resources and demand. One notable contribution in the field is the study by [7] which proposed a decentralized control system for an islanded microgrid focusing on the coordination of distributed energy resources and load management. Employing a hierarchical control architecture, the authors demonstrated the system's efficacy in effectively balancing energy resources and demand leading to improved energy efficiency and enhanced microgrid reliability.
Similarly, the proposed work in [8] put forward a centralized control system for an islanded microgrid that integrated renewable energy sources and energy storage systems. By utilizing a model predictive control (MPC) algorithm the authors illustrated that the proposed control system efficiently balanced energy resources and demand resulting in improved energy efficiency and reduced reliance on conventional energy sources. Furthermore, another decentralized control system is proposed in [9] for an islanded microgrid, integrating renewable energy sources, energy storage systems and demand response strategies. Employing a game-theoretic approach, the authors showed that this control system effectively balanced energy resources and demand. Thus, enhancing energy efficiency and microgrid reliability. Additionally, a centralized control system is introduced in [10] for an islanded microgrid integrating wind and photovoltaic power generation, energy storage and load demand. The designed control system aimed to balance energy resources and demand, optimize resource utilization decisions and monitor energy transactions within the microgrid. The study demonstrated the improved efficiency and stability of the microgrid achieved by the proposed control system.
In line with decentralized strategies, a decentralized control strategy is proposed in [11] for a microgrid integrating photovoltaic power generation, energy storage and load demand. This control system monitored critical energy parameters, such as voltage, current, frequency and mechanical energy, ensuring they remained within specified ranges. The study highlighted the enhanced reliability and stability of the microgrid resulting from the proposed control strategy.
These studies collectively contribute significant insights into the advancement of microgrid control systems, offering effective solutions to optimize energy management, improve efficiency and enhance the reliability and stability of microgrid networks.
The existing literature provides valuable insights into centralized control systems for islanded multivariable minigrids. However, there is a need for further research to explore the potential benefits and limitations of different control architectures and algorithms in the context of islanded microgrid networks [12]. Additionally, comparative studies comparing centralized and decentralized control systems for microgrid networks are lacking and it remains unclear which control system is more effective in different scenarios [13]. Future research should address these gaps and provide a comprehensive understanding of the role of centralized control systems in improving the performance, stability and resilience of microgrid networks [14]. This literature review emphasizes recent studies on centralized control systems for islanded multivariable minigrids. The existing studies demonstrate the crucial role of centralized control systems in improving the performance, stability and resilience of microgrid networks through effective management of energy resources and demand [15]. However, further research is necessary to explore the potential benefits and limitations of different control architectures and algorithms for islanded microgrid networks.
The investigation of centralized control systems for multivariable islanded minigrids holds substantial importance in the energy industry. Despite the growing demand for sustainable and decentralized energy solutions, previous research has identified a gap in the literature regarding the implementation and effectiveness of centralized control systems in such minigrids [16]. In the context of a multivariable islanded minigrid, a centralized control system assumes a critical role in regulating energy generation and distribution. The incorporation of advanced control algorithms has the potential to enhance system stability, efficiency and overall performance [17]. However, the current understanding of centralized control systems for multivariable islanded minigrids remains limited, necessitating further research to comprehend the associated challenges and opportunities in their implementation.
This research holds significant importance as it addresses the challenges faced by remote and underserved communities that lack access to reliable and sustainable energy sources [18]. By addressing the research gap and contributing to the development of sustainable energy solutions this study has the potential to stimulate economic development and enhance the quality of life in these communities. The findings of this research will be of great interest to energy sector practitioners, policymakers and researchers enriching the existing body of knowledge in this field.
In conclusion, the existing literature offers substantial information on centralized control systems for islanded multivariable minigrids. The reviewed studies indicate that such control systems effectively balance energy resources and demand, improve energy efficiency and enhance the reliability and stability of microgrid networks. However, additional research is warranted to investigate different control architectures and algorithms and their applicability in islanded microgrid networks.
The primary objective of this research is to conduct a comprehensive examination of centralized control systems for multivariable islanded minigrids and identify areas for improvement within these systems. The utilization of MATLAB in designing and testing an energy management system provides a quantitative approach to analysis. The results of this study will contribute to the advancement of the field of energy systems by offering valuable insights into the benefits and limitations of centralized control systems.
The design of the control system for the minigrid will be guided by the energy resources that are involved. The minigrid is considered as a power network with the capability to generate between 10 kW and 10 MW utilizing solar and wind energy as the primary power sources with energy storage facilities and a standby generator to address power failure emergencies. The size of a minigrid can also be determined based on the population it serves with a population of up to two hundred households in a rural area being considered as a minigrid. The control system being developed will be multivariable, taking into account the various energy resources and energy transactions that are expected to occur within the islanded minigrid. In this study, the power consumption per household is set at 1 kW which results in a maximum power requirement of 200 kW for the entire population. Table 1 summarizes the data used in this paper.
Parameter | Value |
Minimum minigrid power | 10 kW |
Maximum minigrid power | 10 MW |
Power consumption per household | 1 kW |
Maximum power requirement for the entire population | 200 kW |
Minimum wind speed | 4 m/s |
In order to effectively manage and monitor the energy transactions within the minigrid the energy produced, consumed or stored will be expressed in Watt-hours. This allows a comprehensive and accurate representation of the energy flow within the minigrid and enable effective control of the system.
The power rating of the energy resources has been set to the baseline load consumption of 200 kW to account for the intermittency nature of solar and wind which are the main energy sources. This ensures that the minigrid will have adequate capacity to meet the power demands even on days when the solar and wind conditions are not optimal. As a result, all energy resources including the energy storage facility and the generator are rated at 200 kW to meet the baseline load consumption.
The control system is flexible and capable of accommodating increases in power rating should the need arise in the future. Figure 1 illustrates some of the functionalities of the proposed control system. By providing an adaptable solution that can cater to changes in energy demand the control system helps ensuring the reliability and efficiency of the minigrid.
The algorithm developed which draws inspiration from [19] to control the islanded minigrid is capable of monitoring the energy status of the various stakeholders, including the solar panels, wind turbines, energy storage system and generator. The algorithm continuously tracks the energy levels of each of these components allowing for real-time monitoring of the energy status within the minigrid. This information will be crucial in ensuring that the minigrid is operating efficiently and effectively and in making informed decisions about energy management and distribution. With the ability to monitor the energy levels of each component the algorithm will play a critical role in maintaining the reliability and stability of the minigrid.
The proposed algorithm
Energy data loading.
The user should enter the amount of energy resources.
The user should enter the capacity of the combined plant.
The algorithm calculates the portion/ contribution of each energy source.
Eg(i) = Et × ratio(Eg (i))
where Eg(i) is the ith energy source and ratio(Eg(i)) represents its ratio from the total power
Check the supply and energy demand.
If Eg(i)≥El, where El is the load demand.
Energy source Eg=Eg(i)
Energy stored Es=Eg−El
Update data
Else
Connect another energy source (i++)
Energy stored Es=Eg−El
Update data
if Eg<El then
Es, new = Es − El
where Es,new is the new amount needed from the energy storage sources
Check the SOC and SOD
Update data
To implement this algorithm, one needs to have the load profile. The profile of an arbitrary load considers peak and off-peak time use of energy.
In this section, the results are presented and divided into the following:
The residential load profile in rural areas is characterized by a distinct pattern of energy consumption throughout the day. Research has revealed that the demand for electricity is at its highest during the morning, noon and evening hours. The morning peak is attributed to the concurrent demand for heating, hot water preparation, breakfast preparation and lighting. The noon period also experiences a peak demand primarily due to the consumption of electricity for cooking, heating and lighting purposes.
The energy utilization decreases at night and begins to increase again in the morning leading to the second peak of the day. Despite this morning peak, it is observed that the evening peak is more pronounced in comparison primarily due to the increased demand for cooking and space heating. This recurring pattern of energy consumption can be accurately modeled and depicted in a graph such as Figure 2 to provide a clear visual representation of the residential load profile in rural areas.
It is important to note that this pattern of energy consumption in rural areas may vary depending on various factors such as climate, socioeconomic status and energy efficiency measures. Nevertheless, understanding the residential load profile in rural areas is crucial for power system planners as it informs the design and operation of power systems and the deployment of energy management strategies.
The solar energy profile is contingent on the levels of irradiance and exhibits a minimum value prior to sunrise and sunset. As the sun rotates, irradiance increases at sunrise and reaches its maximum at noon. Thereafter, it declines until sunset (as depicted in Figure 3). This profile is known to possess a Gaussian shape and can be mathematically approximated using Eq 1.
SolarEn=Semax(1σ√π)e−12(x−μ)2 | (1) |
where SolarEn is the solar energy, Semax is the peak value of solar energy, σ is the standard deviation.
The wind plant profile is governed by the speed and torque which serve as control elements. According to literature, a wind speed of 4 m/s is sufficient to activate a wind turbine (WT). For this study, it will be assumed that the minimum wind speed requirement of 4 m/s is met (as depicted in Figure 4).
The generator operates at a constant wattage in its steady-state regime as illustrated in Figure 5.
The total energy will be comprised of the individual contributions from the solar and wind sources, as well as the storage system. The generator will also contribute, serving as a backup source in instances where the other energy sources cannot meet the load demand or in the event of a pre-load network fault (as depicted in Figure 6).
Figure 7 illustrates the stored energy, which can be calculated as the difference between the total energy and the load energy, or the energy consumed by the load. It is important to note that in instances where the load energy exceeds the total energy, the storage devices supply the load resulting in a negative output in the stored energy profile.
Figure 8 presents an integrated perspective of the energy system. It enables a visual examination of the energy source profiles relative to the load energy as well as exhibiting the generator profile graphically.
The algorithm implemented in MATLAB provides the ability to monitor the system status at any time by displaying the profiles specifically for the desired time. The user is prompted to input the desired time for monitoring through the use of a prompt as depicted in Figures 9 and 10.
The time of the day can range from 0:00 to 24:00, with the option to monitor performance at a more precise time including minutes. To do this, minutes must be converted into a fractional number within the range of 0 to 1 represented as the interval [0, 1]. For example, 30 minutes would be represented as 0.5, 15 minutes as 0.25, 45 minutes as 0.75 and so on. Figure 9 illustrates the message box for a user who has entered a time of 12:30.
The current algorithm permits the user to monitor the minigrid based on the desired time. However, there is a requirement to also control the levels or amplitudes of the energy sources, particularly solar and wind. This is necessitated by the observation of negative values in the stored energy profile which implies that the load demand has exceeded the supply. To address this, the levels of the energy sources must be adjusted. As such, the control algorithm for the minigrid must be designed to incorporate the capability for adjusting these levels. The user will be prompted through a message box to make any necessary adjustments (as depicted in Figure 11).
The implementation of the minigrid system requires a comprehensive monitoring and updating mechanism for the energy resources it provides. To facilitate this, the system is designed to provide visual representations of the energy levels both in graphical and numerical forms as depicted in Figures 11–18. These representations highlight that the energy levels of the solar and wind sources were limited to a maximum of 0.1 MW. The objective of this constraint is to ensure that the load demand is always met even in scenarios where the energy supply from the sources is limited.
The sequential presentation of the energy source profiles in Figures 12–20 is designed to provide a clear and comprehensive understanding of the individual contributions of each source to the overall energy output of the minigrid. Each profile displays the energy output of a specific source over the course of the day providing insights into the energy production capacity of each source. The final representation of the minigrid energy system, incorporating all energy source profiles into one comprehensive overview, enables a thorough evaluation of the minigrid's performance and serves as a valuable tool for decision-making and optimization efforts.
The outlook of the energy transaction until 15:00 reflects that the load was supplied using the solar energy and wind sources exclusively. Furthermore, storage devices have been charging continually.
In other words, the graphical representation of the energy transaction until 15:00 (Figure 19) indicates that the energy demand from the load was met solely through the utilization of the solar and wind energy sources. Additionally, the storage devices were continuously being charged during this time period. This analysis provides valuable insight into the functioning of the minigrid energy system particularly highlighting the ability of the solar and wind sources to meet the energy demand without the need for additional support from the storage devices. Furthermore, the continuous charging of the storage devices ensures that the minigrid energy system is able to maintain a sufficient level of energy availability to meet any potential fluctuations in energy demand
The stored energy profile exhibits negative values in the evening hours indicating that the energy produced by solar and wind sources was insufficient to meet the demands of the load. In such circumstances the storage system had to step in to supply the load. Hence, it is vital to monitor the state of charge (SoC) and depth of discharge (DoD) of the storage system. The SoC gives an indication of the amount of energy stored in the storage system relative to its maximum capacity while the DoD measures the amount of energy depleted from the storage system. By keeping an eye on these parameters the performance of the storage system can be better understood and informed decisions can be made regarding its operation.
A centralized energy management system (CEMS) was designed and simulated using MATLAB's integrated development environment. An algorithm was developed to run the minigrid effectively, considering the level of energy from solar and wind plants and the state of the battery storage system. The algorithm prioritizes the optimal use of available energy while meeting the demand of the load which is set at 200 kW serving 200 households. The profiles of various power plants were predefined in MATLAB taking into consideration their normal behavior throughout the day. The algorithm was user-friendly, allowing the user to check the status of the plants in kW figures. The algorithm was tested by simulating scenarios where the load demand was met by a single energy source and if insufficient other sources were connected. The excess energy was stored in a battery system. The algorithm was found to be functional, granting a continuous and reliable supply to the load and allowing the switching on and off of a plant and storage of excess energy. In conclusion, the algorithm developed in MATLAB proved to be effective in simulating the centralized control of the minigrid and ensuring self-regulation and sustainability. The user-friendly interface made it easy to access plant status and simulate necessary actions.
Hence, results showed that the solar energy profile exhibits a Gaussian shape with a minimum value prior to sunrise and sunset, a maximum value at noon and a decline from noon until sunset. This pattern is due to the earth's rotation and the sun's movement across the sky. By modeling the solar energy profile using Eq (1) which takes into account the position of the sun, the earth's rotation and other factors we were able to accurately predict the amount of solar energy that can be harvested from a given location.
The operation of a wind plant is dependent on two key factors wind speed and torque. It has been widely established in the literature that a minimum wind speed of four meters per second is required for a wind turbine to effectively generate energy. This requirement is considered sufficient to activate the wind turbine as demonstrated in various studies and reports. Where, in the present study it is assumed that this minimum wind speed requirement of four meters per second is met as represented in Figure 4. This assumption forms an important foundation for the subsequent analysis and evaluation of the wind plant's performance.
By ensuring that the minimum wind speed requirement is met it can be assumed that the wind turbine will operate effectively allowing for a more accurate analysis of its performance. It is important to note that while a wind speed of four meters per second is considered sufficient, the performance of the wind plant will also depend on the torque generated by the wind. The interplay between wind speed and torque is crucial in determining the overall efficiency of the wind turbine and this will be taken into consideration in any analysis and evaluation of the wind plant's performance.
In the steady-state regime of operation, the generator functions at a fixed level of power output represented by constant wattage as depicted in Figure 5. This implies that the energy production by the generator remains constant with no variations in output over time. The generator operates within its specified power output range and exhibits consistent performance providing a constant source of energy. The generator's constant wattage in the steady-state regime ensures reliable and predictable energy production which is essential for various applications that require a constant energy supply.
The overall energy supply will be comprised of a combination of energy from both solar and wind sources as well as from the energy storage system. In situations where the solar and wind sources are unable to meet the energy demand or in the event of a pre-load network malfunction the generator will serve as a supplementary source of energy (as illustrated in Figure 6). In essence, the generator will act as a backup to ensure that the energy supply remains continuous and stable even under adverse conditions.
In Figure 7 is display the stored energy in an energy storage system and to provide insight into the system's energy balance. The figure helps to understand the relationship between the total energy, load energy and stored energy and how they change over time. The stored energy can be determined by subtracting the load energy from the total energy and it represents the amount of energy that is available for use. When the load energy surpasses the total energy the energy storage devices are supplying energy to the load and the stored energy profile will show a negative value. Furthermore, it is crucial to acknowledge the stored energy profile because it provides important information about the energy storage system's performance. This information can be used to optimize the system's operation and ensure that it is functioning as expected. By understanding the stored energy profile energy engineers, technicians and operators can make informed decisions about how to best manage the energy storage system and ensure that it is able to provide energy when it is needed.
As Figure 8 is a visual representation of an energy system that provides a comprehensive understanding of the interrelationships between different components. The figure displays the energy source profiles which refers to the energy sources used to produce electricity [20] in relation to the energy load which refers to the energy demand of a particular area or region. The figure also shows the generator profile which refers to the production of electricity by the power generators graphically. This representation allows for an easy visual examination of the energy generation and consumption patterns and how they are related to each other. In essence, Figure 8 provides an integrated perspective of the energy system as it presents a comprehensive view of the energy sources, energy demand and energy production. This figure is crucial in energy planning, management and decision making as it provides insights into the energy production and consumption patterns and helps in identifying the energy sources that are most suitable for a given situation.
The minigrid system which is aimed at providing energy resources to communities in remote areas necessitates a robust and efficient monitoring and updating mechanism [21]. To achieve this, the system was devised to provide clear and concise visual representations of the energy levels. These representations can be seen in Figures 11–18 and include both graphical and numerical forms. These visual representations clearly demonstrate that the energy levels generated from the solar and wind sources are limited to a maximum of 0.1 MW. This constraint is imposed with the intention of guaranteeing that the energy demand from the system's users is always met even in situations where the energy supply from the solar and wind sources is limited. The implementation of this constraint serves as a critical aspect of the minigrid system as it helps to ensure the stability and reliability of the energy supply. In turn, this helps to guarantee that the system's users receive a steady and uninterrupted supply of energy. The visual representations and numerical constraints of the energy levels in the minigrid system provide a comprehensive and straightforward approach to monitoring and updating the energy resources provided by the system [22]. This approach serves as an essential tool for ensuring the stability and reliability of the energy supply. Thus, ensuring the satisfaction of the system's users.
The data presented in Figure 19 offers an overview of the energy update and transaction at 15:00. According to the figure, it can be inferred that the energy demand from the load was fulfilled by the utilization of solar and wind energy sources without any support from the storage devices. Additionally, the storage devices were observed to be continuously charged during this time period.
This analysis sheds light on the efficient functioning of the minigrid energy system and highlights the capability of the solar and wind energy sources in meeting the energy demand without the need for additional support. Moreover, the continuous charging of the storage devices serves as a measure to ensure that the minigrid energy system remains equipped to handle any potential fluctuations in energy demand in the future. The figure provides valuable information on the energy transaction until 15:00 and highlights the effectiveness of the minigrid energy system in meeting the energy demand while maintaining energy availability.
The centralized energy management system was designed and simulated using MATLAB IDE to control a minigrid serving 200 households with each consuming around 12 kWh. The algorithm was developed to prioritize the optimal use of available energy while meeting the load demand and to switch on and off different energy sources such as PV plant, wind plant, generator and battery storage depending on the situation. The power profiles of the plants were predefined in MATLAB and the algorithm allowed the user to check the status of the plants at any time of the day. The algorithm proved to be functional in regulating the minigrid and ensuring a continuous and reliable energy supply to the load. The design was user-friendly, displaying input/output and allowing for easy monitoring of the system. The integration of renewable energy sources is enabled and the system protects against power outages improving reliability and security. The results of this study have important implications for the development and deployment of minigrid networks in similar environments. Further research is needed to validate and refine the proposed control system.
The authors declare that the research conducted and presented in the current paper and submitted to AIMS Journal, have not utilized AI tools in any stages of the research process.
This study was funded by the Cape Peninsula University of Technology (CPUT), Cape Town, South Africa.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
[1] | Global hydrogen review 2022. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-hydrogen-review-2022. |
[2] | Gold hydrogen natural hydrogen exploration. Available from: https://www.energymining.sa.gov.au/industry/energy-resources/regulation/projects-of-public-interest/natural-hydrogen-exploration/gold-hydrogen-natural-hydrogen-exploration. |
[3] |
Guban D, Muritala IK, Roeb M, et al. (2020) Assessment of sustainable high temperature hydrogen production technologies. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45: 26156–26165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.145 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.145
![]() |
[4] | Ursua A, Gandia LM, Sanchis P (2012) Hydrogen production from water electrolysis: Current status and future trends. Proc IEEE 100: 410–426. |
[5] |
Dincer I (2012) Green methods for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37: 1954–1971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.173 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.173
![]() |
[6] |
Balat M (2008) Potential importance of hydrogen as a future solution to environmental and transportation problems. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33: 4013–4029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.05.047 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.05.047
![]() |
[7] |
Moçoteguy P, Brisse A (2013) A review and comprehensive analysis of degradation mechanisms of solid oxide electrolysis cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy 38: 15887–15902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.045 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.045
![]() |
[8] |
Pinsky R, Sabharwall P, Hartvigsen J, et al. (2020) Comparative review of hydrogen production technologies for nuclear hybrid energy systems. Progress Nuclear Energy 123: 103317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2020.103317 doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2020.103317
![]() |
[9] |
Khalili M, Karimian Bahnamiri F, Mehrpooya M (2021) An integrated process configuration of solid oxide fuel/electrolyzer cells (SOFC‐SOEC) and solar organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for cogeneration applications. Int J Energy Res 45: 11018–11040. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.6587 doi: 10.1002/er.6587
![]() |
[10] |
Phillips R, Edwards A, Rome B, et al. (2017) Minimising the ohmic resistance of an alkaline electrolysis cell through effective cell design. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42: 23986–23994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.184 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.184
![]() |
[11] |
Wirkert FJ, Roth J, Jagalski S, et al. (2020) A modular design approach for PEM electrolyser systems with homogeneous operation conditions and highly efficient heat management. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45: 1226–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.185 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.185
![]() |
[12] |
Carmo M, Keeley GP, Holtz D, et al. (2019) PEM water electrolysis: Innovative approaches towards catalyst separation, recovery and recycling. Int J Hydrogen Energy 44: 3450–3455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.030 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.030
![]() |
[13] |
Kumar S, Himabindu V (2019) Hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis—A review. Mate Sci Energy Technol 2: 442–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mset.2019.03.002 doi: 10.1016/j.mset.2019.03.002
![]() |
[14] |
Kim J, Jun A, Gwon O, et al. (2018) Hybrid-solid oxide electrolysis cell: A new strategy for efficient hydrogen production. Nano Energy 44: 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.074 doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.074
![]() |
[15] |
Schnuelle C, Thoeming J, Wassermann T, et al. (2019) Socio-technical-economic assessment of power-to-X: Potentials and limitations for an integration into the German energy system. Energy Res Social Sci 51: 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.01.017 doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.01.017
![]() |
[16] |
Buttler A, Spliethoff H (2018) Current status of water electrolysis for energy storage, grid balancing and sector coupling via power-to-gas and power-to-liquids: A review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 82: 2440–2454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.003 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.003
![]() |
[17] |
Ganley JC (2009) High temperature and pressure alkaline electrolysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34: 3604–3611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.02.083 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.02.083
![]() |
[18] |
Badea G, Naghiu GS, Giurca I, et al. (2017) Hydrogen production using solar energy-technical analysis. Energy Proc 112: 418–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1097 doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1097
![]() |
[19] |
Laguna-Bercero MA (2012) Recent advances in high temperature electrolysis using solid oxide fuel cells: A review. J Power Sources 203: 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.12.019 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.12.019
![]() |
[20] |
Nechache A, Hody S (2021) Alternative and innovative solid oxide electrolysis cell materials: A short review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 149: 111322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111322 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111322
![]() |
[21] |
Todd D, Schwager M, Mérida W (2014) Thermodynamics of high-temperature, high-pressure water electrolysis. J Power Sources 269: 424–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.144 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.144
![]() |
[22] |
Fujiwara S, Kasai S, Yamauchi H, et al. (2008) Hydrogen production by high temperature electrolysis with nuclear reactor. Progress Nuclear Energy 50: 422–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2007.11.025 doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2007.11.025
![]() |
[23] |
Li Q, Zheng Y, Guan W, et al. (2014) Achieving high-efficiency hydrogen production using planar solid-oxide electrolysis stacks. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39: 10833–10842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.070 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.070
![]() |
[24] |
Ni M, Leung MK, Sumathy K, et al. (2006) Potential of renewable hydrogen production for energy supply in Hong Kong. Int J Hydrogen Energy 31: 1401–1412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.11.005 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.11.005
![]() |
[25] |
Dresp S, Dionigi F, Klingenhof M, et al. (2019) Direct electrolytic splitting of seawater: Opportunities and challenges. ACS Energy Lett 4: 933–942. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00220 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00220
![]() |
[26] |
Khan M, Al-Attas T, Roy S, et al. (2021) Seawater electrolysis for hydrogen production: A solution looking for a problem? Energy Environ Sci 14: 4831–4839. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EE00870F doi: 10.1039/D1EE00870F
![]() |
[27] | Peterson D, Vickers J, Desantis D (2019) DOE hydrogen and fuel cells program record: Hydrogen production cost from PEM electrolysis, national renewable energy laboratory. Available from: https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/19009_h2_production_cost_pem_electrolysis_2019.pdf. |
[28] |
Guo J, Zheng Y, Hu Z, et al. (2023) Direct seawater electrolysis by adjusting the local reaction environment of a catalyst. Nat Energy 8: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01195-x doi: 10.1038/s41560-023-01195-x
![]() |
[29] | Australia's big clean energy build hits record highs: Clean Energy Australia report (2023). Available from: https://www.cleanenergycouncil.org.au/news/australias-big-clean-energy-build-hits-record-highs-clean-energy-australia-report#: ~: text = %E2%80%9CLarge%2Dscale%20clean%20energy%20investment, data%20collection%20began%20in%202017. |
[30] | Cosmos Magazine (2022) Australia to light the way with industrial-scale power. Available from: https://cosmosmagazine.com/technology/energy/pilbara-energy-hub/. |
[31] | E. ON (2022) Fortescue future industries and E. ON partner on journey to become Europe's largest green renewable hydrogen supplier and distributer. Available from: https://www.eon.com/en/about-us/media/press-release/2022/2022-03-29-fortescue-future-industries-and-eon-partnership.html. |
[32] |
Mohammed-Ibrahim J, Moussab H (2020) Recent advances on hydrogen production through seawater electrolysis. Mater Sci Energy Technol 3: 780–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/Jmset.2020.09.005 doi: 10.1016/Jmset.2020.09.005
![]() |
[33] |
Guo J, Zheng Y, Hu Z, et al. (2023) Direct seawater electrolysis by adjusting the local reaction environment of a catalyst. Nat Energy 8: 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01195-x doi: 10.1038/s41560-023-01195-x
![]() |
[34] |
Chen Z, Wei W, Song L, et al. (2022) Hybrid water electrolysis: A new sustainable avenue for energy-saving hydrogen production. Sustainable Horiz 1: 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.horiz.2021.100002 doi: 10.1016/j.horiz.2021.100002
![]() |
[35] |
Freund S, Sanchez D (2022) Green hydrogen market and growth. Machinery Energy Syst Hydrogen Economy, 605–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90394-3.00001-1 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-90394-3.00001-1
![]() |
[36] | Infolink Consulting (2022) Australia green hydrogen: production costs to drop 37% by 2030. Available from: https://www.infolink-group.com/energy-article/green-hydrogen-costs-in-australia-to-reduce-37-by-2030. |
[37] | IRENA (2020) Green Hydrogen cost reduction: Scaling up electrolysers to meet the 1.5 ℃ climate goal. Int Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. |
[38] |
Kampker A, Heimes H, Kehrer M, et al. (2022) Fuel cell system production cost modelling and analysis. Energy Rep 9: 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/Jegyr.2022.10.364 doi: 10.1016/Jegyr.2022.10.364
![]() |
[39] |
Heffel JW (2003) NOx emission and performance data for a hydrogen fueled internal combustion engine at 1500 rpm using exhaust gas recirculation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 28: 901–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(02)00157-X doi: 10.1016/S0360-3199(02)00157-X
![]() |
[40] | Internet Energy Agency (2022) Global hydrogen review 2022. Int Energy Agency, IEA Publications. |
[41] |
Rezk MG, Foroozesh J, Zivar D, et al. (2019) CO2 storage potential during CO2 enhanced oil recovery in sandstone reservoirs. J Natural Gas Sci Eng 66: 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2019.04.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2019.04.002
![]() |
[42] |
Valente A, Iribarren D, Dufour J (2020) Prospective carbon footprint comparison of hydrogen options. Sci Total Environ 728: 138212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138212 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138212
![]() |
[43] |
de Kleijne K, de Coninck H, van Zelm R, et al. (2022) The many greenhouse gas footprints of green hydrogen. Sustainable Energy Fuels 6: 4383–4387. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SE00444E doi: 10.1039/D2SE00444E
![]() |
[44] |
Howarth RW, Jacobson MZ (2021) How green is blue hydrogen? Energy Sci Eng 9: 1673–1945. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.956 doi: 10.1002/ese3.956
![]() |
[45] | Hydrogen Certification 101 (2023) International partnership for hydrogen and fuel cells in the economy. 2022, IPHE.net. |
[46] | ISO 14064-2 (2019) Greenhouse gases—Part 2: Specification with guidance at the project level for quantification, monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emission reductions or removal enhancements. Available from: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso: std: iso: 14064: -2: ed-2: v1: en. |
[47] | IPCC (2019) 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/2019-refinement-to-the-2006-ipcc-guidelines-for-national-greenhouse-gas-inventories/. |
[48] | Yugo M, Soler A (2019) A look into the role of e-fuels in the transport system in Europe (2030–2050), (literature review). Available from: https://www.concawe.eu/wp-content/uploads/E-fuels-article.pdf. |
[49] |
Zhao C, Sun J, Zhang Y (2022) A study of the drivers of decarbonization in the plastics supply chain in the post-COVID-19 era. Sustainability 14: 15858. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315858 doi: 10.3390/su142315858
![]() |
[50] | IEA (2021) Ammonia technology roadmap. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/ammonia-technology-roadmap, License: CC BY 4.0. |
[51] | Global Maritime Forum (2022) Ammonia as a shipping fuel. Available from: https://www.globalmaritimeforum.org/news/ammonia-as-a-shipping-fuel. |
[52] |
Griffin PW, Hammond GP (2021) The prospects for 'green steel' making in a net-zero economy: A UK perspective. Global Transitions 3: 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2021.03.001 doi: 10.1016/j.glt.2021.03.001
![]() |
[53] |
Demartini M, Ferrari M, Govindan K, et al. (2023) The transition to electric vehicles and a net zero economy: A model based on circular economy, stakeholder theory, and system thinking approach. J Cleaner Product 40: 137031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137031 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137031
![]() |
[54] |
Staffell I, Scamman D, Velazquez Abad A, et al. (2019) The role of hydrogen and fuel cells in the global energy system. Energy Environ Sci 12: 463–491. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EE01157E doi: 10.1039/C8EE01157E
![]() |
[55] |
Razmi AR, Sharifi S, Gholamian E, et al. (2023) Green hydrogen—Future grid-scale energy storage solutions. Mech Chem Technol Principles 15: 573–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90786-6.00006-6 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-90786-6.00006-6
![]() |
[56] |
Razmi AR, Alirahmi SM, Nabat MH, et al. (2022) A green hydrogen energy storage concept based on parabolic trough collector and proton exchange membrane electrolyzer/fuel cell: Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analyses with multi-objective optimization. Int J Hydrogen Energy 47: 26468–26489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.021 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.021
![]() |
[57] |
Alirahmi SM, Razmi AR, Arabkoohsar A (2021) Comprehensive assessment and multi-objective optimization of a green concept based on a combination of hydrogen and compressed air energy storage (CAES) systems. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 142: 110850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110850 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110850
![]() |
[58] |
Urs RR, Chadly A, Sumaiti AA, et al. (2023) Techno-economic analysis of green hydrogen as an energy-storage medium for commercial buildings. Clean Energy 7: 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkac083 doi: 10.1093/ce/zkac083
![]() |
[59] | National Fire Protection Association (2007) NFPA 68: Standard on explosion protection by deflagration venting. |
[60] | Folkson R (2014) Alternative fuels and advanced vehicle technologies for improved environmental performance: Towards zero carbon transportation. 2nd Eds. https://doi.org/10.1016/c2020-0-02395-9 |
[61] |
Zhang B, Liu H, Wang C (2017) On the detonation propagation behavior in hydrogen-oxygen mixture under the effect of spiral obstacles. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42: 21392–21402, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.201 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.201
![]() |
[62] |
Ng HD, Lee JH (2008) Comments on explosion problems for hydrogen safety. J Loss Prev Process Ind 21: 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2007.06.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2007.06.001
![]() |
[63] |
Teng H, Tian C, Zhang Y, et al. (2021) Morphology of oblique detonation waves in a stoichiometric hydrogen-air mixture. J Fluid Mech 913: A1. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.1131 doi: 10.1017/jfm.2020.1131
![]() |
[64] |
Andersson J, Grönkvist S (2019) Large-scale storage of hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy 44: 11901–11919. https://doi.org/10.1016/Jijhydene.2019.03.063 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.063
![]() |
[65] |
Muhammed NS, Haq B, Al Shehri D, et al. (2022) A review on underground hydrogen storage: Insight into geological sites, influencing factors and future outlook. Energy Rep 8: 461–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/Jegyr.2021.12.002 doi: 10.1016/Jegyr.2021.12.002
![]() |
[66] |
Aftab A, Hassanpouryouzband A, Xie Q, et al. (2022) Toward a fundamental understanding of geological hydrogen storage. Eng Chem Res 61: 3233–3253. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04380 doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04380
![]() |
1. | Mohammad Javad Bordbari, Fuzhan Nasiri, Networked Microgrids: A Review on Configuration, Operation, and Control Strategies, 2024, 17, 1996-1073, 715, 10.3390/en17030715 | |
2. | Mutiu Shola Bakare, Abubakar Abdulkarim, Aliyu Nuhu Shuaibu, Mundu Mustafa Muhamad, Energy management controllers: strategies, coordination, and applications, 2024, 7, 2520-8942, 10.1186/s42162-024-00357-9 | |
3. | Kaka Sanaullah, Mingchao Xia, Arif Hussain, Kashif Hussain, Improving islanded distribution system stability with adaptive decision-making framework, 2024, 2194-5756, 10.1515/ijeeps-2024-0061 |
Parameter | Value |
Minimum minigrid power | 10 kW |
Maximum minigrid power | 10 MW |
Power consumption per household | 1 kW |
Maximum power requirement for the entire population | 200 kW |
Minimum wind speed | 4 m/s |