Research article

Ant colony optimization algorithm and fuzzy logic for switched reluctance generator control

  • Received: 10 February 2022 Revised: 25 June 2022 Accepted: 25 July 2022 Published: 02 September 2022
  • This article discusses two methods to control the output voltage of switched reluctance generators (SRGs) used in wind generator systems. To reduce the ripple of the SRG output voltage, a closed-loop voltage control technique has been designed. In the first method, a proportional-integral (PI) controller is used. The parameters of the PI controller are tuned based on the voltage variation. The SRG is generally characterized by strong nonlinearities. However, finding appropriate values for the PI controller is not an easy task. To overcome this problem and simplify the process of tuning the PI controller parameters, a solution based on the ant colony optimization algorithm (ACO) was developed. To settle the PI parameters, several cost functions are used in the implementation of the ACO algorithm. To control the SRG output voltage, a second method was developed based on the fuzzy logic controller. Unlike several previous works, the proposed methods, ACO and fuzzy logic control, are easy to implement and can solve numerous optimization problems. To check the best approach, a comparison between the two methods was performed. Finally, to show the effectiveness of this study, we present examples of simulations that entail the use of a three-phase SRG with a 12/8 structure and SIMULINK tools.

    Citation: Rabyi Tarik, Brouri Adil. Ant colony optimization algorithm and fuzzy logic for switched reluctance generator control[J]. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(5): 987-1004. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022045

    Related Papers:

  • This article discusses two methods to control the output voltage of switched reluctance generators (SRGs) used in wind generator systems. To reduce the ripple of the SRG output voltage, a closed-loop voltage control technique has been designed. In the first method, a proportional-integral (PI) controller is used. The parameters of the PI controller are tuned based on the voltage variation. The SRG is generally characterized by strong nonlinearities. However, finding appropriate values for the PI controller is not an easy task. To overcome this problem and simplify the process of tuning the PI controller parameters, a solution based on the ant colony optimization algorithm (ACO) was developed. To settle the PI parameters, several cost functions are used in the implementation of the ACO algorithm. To control the SRG output voltage, a second method was developed based on the fuzzy logic controller. Unlike several previous works, the proposed methods, ACO and fuzzy logic control, are easy to implement and can solve numerous optimization problems. To check the best approach, a comparison between the two methods was performed. Finally, to show the effectiveness of this study, we present examples of simulations that entail the use of a three-phase SRG with a 12/8 structure and SIMULINK tools.



    加载中


    [1] El-Shahat A, Hunter A, Rahman M, et al. (2019) Ultra-high speed switched reluctance motor-generator for turbocharger applications. Energy Procedia 162: 359-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.04.037 doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.04.037
    [2] Dias RJ, Oliveira BA, Silva KA, et al. (2020) Modelling, simulation and comparative study between switched reluctance generator 8×6 and switched reluctance generator 12×8. Renewable Energy Power Qual J 18: 386-390. https://doi.org/10.24084/repqj18.340 doi: 10.24084/repqj18.340
    [3] Fernao Pires V, Cordeiro A, Foito D, et al. (2020) A multilevel fault-tolerant power converter for a switched reluctance machine drive. IEEE Access 8: 21917-21931. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2967591 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2967591
    [4] Ćalasan MP, Vujičić VP (2017) SRG converter topologies for continuous conduction operation: A comparative evaluation. IET Electr Power Appl 11: 1032-1042. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-epa.2016.0659 doi: 10.1049/iet-epa.2016.0659
    [5] Mosaad MI (2020) Direct power control of SRG-based WECSs using optimised fractional-order PI controller. IET Electr Power Appl 14: 409-417. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-epa.2019.0194 doi: 10.1049/iet-epa.2019.0194
    [6] Brouri A, Kadi L, Tounzi A, et al. (2021) Modelling and identification of switched reluctance machine inductance. Aust J Electr Electron Eng 18: 8-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1448837X.2020.1866269 doi: 10.1080/1448837X.2020.1866269
    [7] Kadi L, Brouri A, Ouannou A (2020) Frequency-geometric identification of magnetization characteristics of switched reluctance machine. Adv Syst Sci Appl 20: 11-26. https://doi.org/10.25728/assa.2020.20.4.839 doi: 10.25728/assa.2020.20.4.839
    [8] Brouri A, Giri F, Ikhouane F, et al. (2014) Identification of hammerstein-wiener systems with backlash input nonlinearity bordered by straight lines, IFAC. https://doi.org/10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.00678 doi: 10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.00678
    [9] Brouri A, Amdouri O, Chaoui FZ, et al. (2014) Frequency identification of hammerstein-wiener systems with piecewise affine input nonlinearity, IFAC. https://doi.org/10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.00303 doi: 10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.00303
    [10] Brouri A, Kadi L, Slassi S (2017) Frequency identification of Hammerstein-Wiener systems with backlash input nonlinearity. Int J Control Autom Syst 15: 2222-2232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-016-0312-3 doi: 10.1007/s12555-016-0312-3
    [11] Brouri A, Rabyi T, Ouannou A (2018) Identification of nonlinear systems with hard nonlinearity. 2018 5th Int Conf Control Decis Inf Technol CoDIT 2018, 506-511. https://doi.org/10.1109/CoDIT.2018.8394834 doi: 10.1109/CoDIT.2018.8394834
    [12] Benyassi M, Brouri A, Rabyi T, et al. (2019) Identification of nonparametric linear systems. Int J Mech 13: 60-63. Available from: http://www.naun.org/main/NAUN/mechanics/2019/a142003-abz.pdf.
    [13] Brouri A, Rabyi T, Ouannou A (2019) Identification of nonlinear systems having hard function. Adv Syst Sci Appl 19: 61-74. https://doi.org/10.25728/assa.2019.19.1.632 doi: 10.25728/assa.2019.19.1.632
    [14] Brouri A, Kadi L, Lahdachi K (2022) Identification of nonlinear system composed of parallel coupling of Wiener and Hammerstein models. Asian J Control 24: 1152-1164. https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.2533 doi: 10.1002/asjc.2533
    [15] Brouri A, Chaoui F-Z, Giri F (2021) Identification of Hammerstein‑Wiener models with hysteresis front nonlinearities. Int J Control, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2021.1972160 doi: 10.1080/00207179.2021.1972160
    [16] Brouri A (2022) Wiener‑Hammerstein nonlinear system identification using spectral analysis. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 32: 6184-6204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2021.1972160 doi: 10.1080/00207179.2021.1972160
    [17] Viajante GP, Chaves EN, Miranda LC, et al. (2021) Design and implementation of a fuzzy control system applied to a 6×4 SRG. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 57: 528-536. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2020.3037263 doi: 10.1109/TIA.2020.3037263
    [18] Kerdtuad P, Kittiratsatcha S (2014) A novel output power control for variable-speed switched reluctance generators using artificial neural network. 2014 17th Int Conf Electr Mach Syst ICEMS 2014, 2839-2845. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEMS.2014.7013981 doi: 10.1109/ICEMS.2014.7013981
    [19] Li S, Zhang S, Habetler TG, et al. (2019) Modeling, design optimization, and applications of switched reluctance machines-A review. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 55: 2660-2681. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2019.2897965 doi: 10.1109/TIA.2019.2897965
    [20] El-Sayed Ahmed Ibrahim H, Said Sayed Ahmed M, Mohamed Awad K (2018) Speed control of switched reluctance motor using genetic algorithm and ant colony based on optimizing PID controller. ITM Web Conf 16: 01001. https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20181601001 doi: 10.1051/itmconf/20181601001
    [21] Mosaad MI, Elkalashy NI, Ashmawy MG (2018) Integrating adaptive control of renewable distributed switched reluctance generation and feeder protection coordination. Electr Power Syst Res 154: 452-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2017.09.017 doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2017.09.017
    [22] Oliveira AL, Filho AJS, Di APSG, et al. (2019) P + RES controller applied to the direct power control of switched reluctance generator. J Control Autom Electr Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-019-00543-1 doi: 10.1007/s40313-019-00543-1
    [23] Saad NH, El-Sattar AA, Metally ME (2018) Artificial neural controller for torque ripple control and maximum power extraction for wind system driven by switched reluctance generator. Ain Shams Eng J 9: 2255-2264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2017.03.005 doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2017.03.005
    [24] Nunes H, Pestana L, Mariano S, et al. (2018) Position control of linear switched reluctance machine using flower pollination algorithm. 9th Int Conf Intell Syst 2018 Theory, Res Innov Appl IS 2018-Proc, 337-342. https://doi.org/10.1109/IS.2018.8710462 doi: 10.1109/IS.2018.8710462
    [25] Hannan MA, Ali JA, Mohamed A, et al. (2018) Optimization techniques to enhance the performance of induction motor drives: A review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 81: 1611-1626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.240 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.240
    [26] Lekhchine S, Bahi T, Soufi Y (2014) Indirect rotor field oriented control based on fuzzy logic controlled double star induction machine. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 57: 206-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.11.053 doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.11.053
    [27] Joshi P, Arora S (2017) Maximum power point tracking methodologies for solar PV systems - A review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 70: 1154-1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.019 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.019
    [28] Barros TAS, Neto PJS, Filho PSN, et al. (2016) Approach for performance optimization of switched reluctance generator in variable-speed wind generation system. Renewable Energy 97: 114-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.05.064 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.05.064
    [29] Shakibjoo AD, Moradzadeh M, Din SU, et al. (2021) Optimized Type-2 fuzzy frequency control for multi-area power systems. IEEE Access 10: 6989-7002. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3139259 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3139259
    [30] Bouali E-T, Abid MR, Boufounas E-M, et al. (2021) Renewable energy integration into Cloud & IoT-based smart agriculture. IEEE Access 10: 1175-1191. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3138160 doi: 10.1109/access.2021.3138160
    [31] Ghosh S (2021) Neuro-Fuzzy-Based IoT assisted power monitoring system for smart grid. IEEE Access 9: 168587-168599. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3137812 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3137812
    [32] Dang XK, Do VD, Nguyen XP (2020) Robust adaptive fuzzy control using genetic algorithm for dynamic positioning system. IEEE Access 8: 222077-222092. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3043453 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3043453
    [33] Park K, Chen Z (2012) Self-tuning fuzzy logic control of a switched reluctance generator for wind energy applications. Proc-2012 3rd IEEE Int Symp Power Electron Distrib Gener Syst PEDG 2012, 357-363. https://doi.org/10.1109/PEDG.2012.6254026 doi: 10.1109/PEDG.2012.6254026
    [34] Behera S, Subudhi B, Pati BB (2016) Design of PI controller in pitch control of wind turbine: A comparison of PSO and PS algorithm. Int J Renewable Energy Res 6: 271-281. https://doi.org/10.20508/ijrer.v6i1.3137.g6783 doi: 10.20508/ijrer.v6i1.3137.g6783
    [35] Long H, Zhang Z, Song Z, et al. (2017) Formulation and analysis of grid and coordinate models for planning wind farm layouts. IEEE Access 5: 1810-1819. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2657638 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2657638
    [36] Arun S, Manigandan T (2021) Design of ACO based PID controller for zeta converter using reduced order methodology. Microprocess Microsyst 81: 103629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103629 doi: 10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103629
    [37] Barros TADS, Neto PJDS, Filho PSN, et al. (2017) An approach for switched reluctance generator in a wind generation system with a wide range of operation speed. IEEE Trans Power Electron 32: 8277-8292. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2017.2697822 doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2017.2697822
    [38] Oshaba AS, Ali ES, Abd Elazim SM (2017) Speed control of SRM supplied by photovoltaic system via ant colony optimization algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 28: 365-374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-2068-8 doi: 10.1007/s00521-015-2068-8
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1411) PDF downloads(137) Cited by(1)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(18)  /  Tables(3)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog